UK Christian Constitution

Home UK Christian Constitution

Why the elite hate ‘Unite the Kingdom’

2
The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally
The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally
The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally
The ‘Unite the Kingdom’ rally

There is now an undeniable disconnect between ordinary people and those in office. The ‘Unite the Kingdom’ rally on 13th September in London’s Parliament Square and across Westminster Bridge drew almost hysterical comments from the Prime Minister. In an interview with Channel 4 News reported in the Standard, Sir Keir Starmer described the demonstration as “plastic patriotism”, adding that it had been more than “just very bad behaviour”, as if it were ‘very bad behaviour’ to turn up to an anti-establishment rally.

Prov 28:15 As a roaring lion, and a ranging bear; so is a wicked ruler over the poor people. 16a The prince that wanteth understanding is also a great oppressor…

How to Join or Support Christian Voice→

The arrogance of Rehoboam

King Rehoboam surveys the wreckage of his kingdom. (We nearly captioned him 'Keir Starmer')
King Rehoboam surveys the wreckage of his kingdom. (We nearly captioned him ‘Keir Starmer’) (Christian Publishing House)

It reminds us of the arrogance, stupidity and contempt for those below him of the Bible’s King Rehoboam, when the people asked for a reduction in their taxes. That did not end well for him. He lost the majority of his kingdom and Judah was then invaded by Egypt. Find the story in 1Kings 12 and 2Chronicles 10-12. It is well worth a read. As it happens, at the end he repented and in Judah, finally, we read, ‘Things went well’. That is what we want for our United Kingdom, but it depends on the Lord raising up righteous, humble, God-fearing men to lead us:

2Chron 12:12 And when he humbled himself, the wrath of the LORD turned from him, that he would not destroy him altogether: and also in Judah things went well. (KJV)

Rehoboan’s stupidity may well have been from the Lord, but nevertheless, the point stands. Arrogant rulers who underestimate the strength of feeling against them will fall under judgement.

It appears there were 24 arrests on the day in London with eight people charged, but how many of those were from the rival hard-left protest has not been disclosed. In comparison, there were over 500 arrests over the two days of Notting Hill Carnival last month, ‘50 of them for possession of an offensive weapon’, according to the Telegraph.

Eyewitness account

The mainstream media were careful to put numbers attending around 100,000. Commentator Philip Patrick attended the rally and had a different view: ‘Suffice to say the numbers who were there … far surpassed the expectations of the police or the mainstream media. … The authorities underestimated the breadth and depth of feeling of people in UK who oppose the direction the country seems to be taking. … The proliferation of Union Jacks, flags of St George, Saltires and Welsh Dragons evidenced the UK-wide appeal of this event – not just how frustrated people feel, but a renewed spirit of Unionism, too.

‘The number of crosses and placards proclaiming Jesus Christ our saviour was, to me at least, surprising. “Jesus is King” was chanted from the stage at one point. (It) reinforced the mood of a people striving for a higher, better, ancient authority to appeal to.’

Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King of kings, and Lord of lords.

Downing Street condemned as “dangerous and inflammatory” comments of Elon Musk, urging those at the rally in London to “fight back” or “die”. The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said Mr Musk’s words threatened “violence and intimidation on our streets”, adding, hopefully: “I don’t think the British public will have any truck with that kind of language.”

But Reform’s Nigel Farage said: “If the fight that Musk was talking about was about standing up for our rights and free speech, if it was about fighting in elections to overcome the established parties, then that absolutely is the fight that we’re in,” he said.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

’Shiver’ through ‘our communities’

Sir Keir went on:“It sent a shiver through so many of our communities who now feel more scared than they did before. I understand that.”

But Mr Farage responded: “I’ll tell you what’s even worse, the fact that over 50% of women don’t feel safe walking the streets alone.”

Judges 5:6 In the days of Shamgar the son of Anath, in the days of Jael, the highways were unoccupied, and the travellers walked through byways.

For London Mayor Sadiq Khan, writing in the Guardian, Elon Musk ‘tried to rally protesters against our democracy’. That’s Mr Khan’s and Sir Keir’s ‘democracy’ of course, not ordinary people’s. He also blamed Donald Trump for ‘dark times, but those who seek to divide us will not win.’ Those at the rally were from ‘the far right’, said the uber-inclusive mayor, leading London Assembly Conservative Leader Susan Hall to reply, ‘your constantly referring to others as far-right is divisive in itself’.

‘Rising tide of hatred’

Sir Sadiq claimed ‘many people, particularly from London’s diverse communities, are feeling extremely worried.’ It’s those plural ‘communities’ now with added ‘diversity’ wheeled out again.

We should note that when today’s elite speak of ‘our communities’ they acknowledge that they have destroyed the unified British community which stood together in two world wars. The ‘communities’ of which they speak are the Muslims who refuse to assimilate.

Numb 15:16 One law and one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you.

Showing little self-awareness, Mr Khan went on to claim ‘our politicians and pundits have refused to condemn the rising tide of hatred in this country’. The man who has encouraged antisemitic Islamo-left parades through London since 7th October 2023 said this even as the tide of hatred of the godless left for the late Charlie Kirk was on open display.

Mr Farage and rally organiser Tommy Robinson are known not to get on, but the former was generous enough to say he thought “the vast majority of people that turned up were good, ordinary decent people who are very, very concerned about what’s happening in this country”. Sign our Petition:

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

Why the disconnect?

Courtney Walsh, 12, 'punished' for wearing Union flag dress to school culture day - LBC
Courtney Walsh, 12, ‘punished’ for wearing Union flag dress to school culture day – LBC

So why is there such a disconnect between the elite and the ‘ordinary decent people’ at the rally? Why was a gathering intended to ‘unite the kingdom’ accused instead of division, of being ‘far-right’ and and inciting violence?

It is because the concept of uniting the kingdom around our Christian heritage, around flags with the cross of Jesus Christ on them (there is an alternative Welsh flag, that of St David, with the gold cross on a black ground) is anathema to the elite.

Prov 15:33 The fear of the LORD is the instruction of wisdom; and before honour is humility.

They want to unite around globalism, multiculturalism and secularism. They hate our Christian heritage and want to disparage it. Hence sending a young girl home from school on ‘culture day’ because she wore a dress depicting the union flag.

In fact 13-year-old Courtney Wright spoke at the rally. She was one of ‘Saturday’s best speakers’ according to the Telegraph’s Alison Pearson, who was there. And no, says Alison, the crowd were not ‘racist’.

Ask for a free copy of our latest newsletter →

‘Culture based on lying’

Dr David Starkey
Dr David Starkey

Exodus 18:21 Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness;

Historian Dr David Starkey takes the problem with the establishment further on Spiked Online. He says: ‘Unfortunately, the ways in which our elites behave today is much like the elites of the latter days of the Soviet Union. It is an entire culture based on lying. Lying about output, about finance, about freedom. … If you govern by shutting people up rather than debating problems openly, those problems eventually grow to become feverish.’

He scorned ‘this idea that immigration is ‘good for the economy’, etc’ and traced the rot back to 2010. ‘The fact that David Cameron, a supposed conservative, professed his greatest achievement was gay marriage was absolute insanity. At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, Britons have effectively been living under a uniparty since John Major. It’s no wonder people are so furious.’

Dr Starkey concluded with a plea ‘To roll back the power of those elites who have lied to us about transgenderism, about multiculturalism and globalism.’

But he warned ‘these ideas .. are so deeply entrenched’ within the establishment. ‘We can change these things. But we can only change it if the right here is as well-prepared as Trump was for his second term – or, I would argue, better.’

The spiritual dimension

Although Dr Starkey does not really ‘Do God’, he is speaking, whether he knows it or not, of the involvement of the spiritual dimension. The godless left are powered by the realm of darkness. Nothing else can explain both the glee over the death of Charlie Kirk and the current language of the elite and their terror of ‘Unite the Kingdom’.

Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

What Dr Starkey hopes for cannot be done in the flesh. Anyone who tries that will fail. And who better to bring that dimension of a prophetic voice into an emerging political party than Christian Voice members and supporters? Leave your comments below.

READ: 1Sam 30:6; 1Kings 12; 2Chronicles 10-12; Prov 28:15-17; Isa 50:2-4, 51:7; Luke 13:31-33.

PRAY: Pray the ordinary decent people standing for a kingdom united around our Christian heritage are encouraged in the Lord. Pray for the Lord to raise up more prophetic voices in politics today. Thank God for Danny Kruger and pray the Lord will keep him safe and encourage him.

Email your MP HERE →

Previous articles

Christian MP defects to Reform →

Tommy Robinson: Far Right? Hate Chants? →

Illegal Migrants: blessing, threat, or judgment? →

Keir Starmer’s sinister deals →

Why has Kemi Badenoch lost her faith? →

City bans Muslim festivals →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Why our rulers hate ‘Unite the Kingdom’

The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally
The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally
Wes Streeting MP
Wes Streeting MP

With just four words of his resignation letter, Wes Streeting exposed the contempt felt in the ruling party for the voters.

He wrote: ‘It is not clear whether democracy or tyranny will define the 21st century. After the financial crisis, austerity, the disaster of Brexit, Liz Truss, the Covid pandemic, the war in Ukraine and now the war in Iran, the country needs to believe again that things can be better than this and that politics is part of the answer, not the source of the problem. These are big challenges that require a bold vision and bigger solutions than we are offering.’

’The Disaster of Brexit’

Did you notice the same four words I did? ‘The disaster of Brexit’. It is tempting to say to him, ‘That was ten years ago, dude. The people voted to come out of the EU. It’s called “democracy”. Get over it.’ But no, for Wes and the godless left, Brexit was and still is a ‘disaster’, a ‘big challenge’ needing ‘a bold vision and bigger solutions than we are offering’. Bigger than Keir’s own attempts to move back into the Single Market?

There was nothing in the Streeting resignation letter about energy costs and security, the welfare crisis or the injustice of inheritance tax. Crucially, there was no recognition of the small boats migrants, their crime wave, antisemitism, Muslim separatism, the grooming gangs, or the pro-Hamas hate marches in our streets.

These are things which concern ordinary people, but no-one can be found in the Labour Party to voice them. Indeed, Mr Streeting even criticised Keir Starmer for his ‘Island of Strangers’ speech, the point of which, that we are no longer a united nation because of migration, ordinary voters agreed.

’Disaster’ vs ‘Catastrophe’

Nakba March London 2023
Nakba March London 2023

Interestingly, the ability of the Wes to nurture a grudge against the voters for ten years of ‘Disaster’ is as nothing compared to the vitriol nurtured by those who will take part in the pro-‘Palestinian’ ‘Nakba’ march on Saturday 16th May. ‘Nakba’ is Arabic for ‘Catastrophe’. It refers to the displacement and dispossession of Arabs (or ‘Palestinians’) during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war during the creation of the State of Israel.

And who started the 1948 war? A coalition of five Arab nations (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria) invaded on 15th May 1948 in response to the Jewish Declaration of Independence the day before.

Remember, God himself promised the land to Abraham:
Gen 12:7 And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him.

The promise was repeated by Moses and then by Joshua, centuries later:
Josh 1:13  Remember the word which Moses the servant of the LORD commanded you, saying, The LORD your God hath given you rest, and hath given you this land.

It follows that the Holy Land is not ‘Palestinian’ land, and the Jews are not ‘occupiers’. It is indeed ‘The Promised Land’, given to them by the Lord Almighty.

Unite the Kingdom March

The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally
The ‘Unite the Kingdom’ rally

The same day, a Unite the Kingdom march organised by Tommy Robinson will conclude with a rally in Parliament Square. Many working-class people will take part, sensing that multiculturalism is a false god and that there is no strength in ‘diversity’, only, as the Bible states, in unity, in this case, under the flag, and under the Christian faith:

Psa 133:1 Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity! … 3 As the dew of Hermon, and as the dew that descended upon the mountains of Zion: for there the LORD commanded the blessing, even life for evermore.

GB News reports that Sir Keir Starmer has banned 11 foreign speakers from entering the UK ahead of the march. Each of them would have been bringing a warning about Islam and its practitioners, some of them hyperbolic, all of them unwelcome to a ruling party fighting the Green Party for the Muslim vote.

We see no recognition from the Prime Minister that those marching under the Union flag have any sort of legitimate concern about what they see as a slow-burn Islamic invasion, the use of sectarianism in politics, the feeling of seeing their country taken from them, the welfare scandal of their taxes funding benefits for those not even born here or entering illegally, the indoctrination of their children in schools, the Establishment always putting other cultures before our own as they worship the false gods of ‘multiculturalism’ and ’strength in diversity’, imposed on us by our elites even as they promise to curtail immigration, ‘stop the boats’ or ‘smash the gangs’.

Fight for the soul

Sir Keir Starmer appears to be testing how far he can push the people before they rebel.
Sir Keir Starmer appears to be testing how far he can push the people before they rebel.

For Keir Starmer, ‘We’re in a fight for the soul of this country, and the Unite the Kingdom march this weekend is a stark reminder of exactly what we are up against. Its organisers are peddling hatred and division, plain and simple.’

That they might have a genuine grievance must not be allowed to occur to him. Right on cue, out came all the Southport rhetoric from 2024 as Sir Keir warned that ‘violent thugs who spew hatred on our streets’ will be hit with the ‘full force of the law’. Oh no, it’s locking people up for tweets all over again. Previous Unite the Kingdom marches have reportedly been entirely peaceful.

Which cannot be said of the Nakba march scheduled for the same day, which Sir Keir completely ignored. And yet, if he really wants to find hatred, that’s where it will be. Murderous antisemitism is written into the Muslim scriptures. It is behind chants like ‘globalise the intifada’, which calls for Jews world-wide to be murdered, and ‘From the River (Jordan) to the (Mediterranean) Sea, Palestine will be free’, no, not of Hamas, or Islam, but of Jews.

The Spiritual Dimension

On one thing, Keir Starmer is right. There is a spiritual dimension. We are in a battle, a spiritual war, for the soul of our country. And there can only be one winner. An atheist, secularist, or even demonic Labour Party is no match for the Lord and his people.

We read that the elites will be defeated in their inevitable war against the Lord, pictured here as the ‘lamb’:
Rev 17:14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

In response to Peter’s declaration of faith in him, the Lord responded with a promise to the Church:
Matt 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

For the promise to take effect, the Church has to pick up its weapons and go to war:
2Cor 10:4 For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;

Pray For those in authority, for the Lord to grant them repentance or replace them with able, humble, God-fearing honest men of truth, men who understand the spiritual dimension and are prepared to proclaim the Lord Jesus Christ of our Christian constitution as our only Saviour. And pray for the Church to rise up and contend for Gospel truth.

Previous Relevant Articles

Nanosermon: The Gospel Armour: Weapons →

Nanosermon: The Gospel Armour – Clothing →

Why is Britain Failing Its Jewish Communities? →

Why our Armed Forces are in a moral morass →

Illegal Migrants: blessing, threat, or judgment? →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Who Are The Trans Activists Influencing British Schools, Sports and the NHS?

Gendered Intelligence training to promote woke ideologies within the work space and schools. Credit: Gendered.
Gendered Intelligence training to promote woke ideologies within the work space and schools. Credit: Gendered.
Gendered Intelligence has delivered almost 400 training sessions to over 9,300 people across 135 organisations Credit: Gendered Intelligence
Gendered Intelligence has delivered almost 400 training sessions to over 9,300 people across 135 organisations Credit: Gendered Intelligence

Across Britain, schools, hospitals, and even sports bodies are quietly being seduced by a group of networks promoting transgenderism.

Behind the slogans of “inclusion” and “diversity” lies a movement that has infiltrated the public sector, rewriting long-held definitions of truth, biology, and morality. From the NHS to the classroom, no institution seems untouched by its influence.

This movement has gained legitimacy through official partnerships, public funding, and a network of advocacy groups presenting themselves as experts in gender identity. One of the most prominent among them is Telegraph, a charity that has become a trusted adviser to government departments, councils, and national charities.

Many Christian educators, doctors, and parents have found themselves pressured to affirm ideas that conflict with both science and Scripture.

2 Timothy 4:3 The time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine

Join or Support Christian Voice →

A Teacher’s Encounter With the New Orthodoxy

As reported on the Telegraph: When South London PE teacher Harriet saw a “Trans Inclusion in Sport” webinar promoted by England Athletics, she expected practical advice about supporting pupils sensitively and safely.

A teenage girl on her team had recently begun identifying as male, and Harriet wanted to ensure she could protect the pupil’s wellbeing while maintaining fairness in sport.

But the session left her alarmed. “I went in open-minded,” she explained, “but came away feeling that it was short on facts and long on ideology.” The training insisted that the physical advantage of male bodies was “overstated,” and that questioning such claims amounted to harm.

Participants were told that “free speech against trans people” was not acceptable, a chilling reminder of how debate is being replaced by dogma. When Harriet privately asked how to keep her female student safe in boys’ teams, the presenter accused her of “assuming gender stereotypes.”

After years of teaching both boys and girls, Ms.Harriet knew the physical realities could not be ignored. But under this new orthodoxy, truth no longer matters; affirmation has become the ultimate virtue.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter

Stop transgenderism now! →

The Money Behind the Movement

The rapid rise of Gendered Intelligence has been fuelled by money, lots of it. The organisation, which only gained charity status in 2019, now commands up to £2,215 for a single-day training course. In 2023–24 alone, its training sessions generated more than £250,000 in revenue, a sharp increase from previous years.

Public grants have also poured in. The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, and the Sainsbury family’s Three Guineas Trust have each contributed hundreds of thousands of pounds. (We recognise these names as promoting other anti-Christian activist NGOs.) By 2024, Gendered Intelligence’s annual income had more than doubled since 2019, with substantial sums coming directly from government contracts.

At a time when ordinary Britons struggle with the cost of living, taxpayers are unknowingly funding an ideology that undermines science and faith. While the NHS waits grow longer, funds are quietly diverted into “diversity” projects that prioritise ideology over patient care.

The question must be asked: how did we get to a point where those who question this spending are branded as bigots, while those profiting from confusion are rewarded as heroes?

Eph 5:11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.

The NHS and the Affirmation Agenda

Gendered Intelligence’s role within the NHS has sparked outrage among medical professionals. Former clinicians from the Tavistock Gender Identity Development Service have accused the charity of promoting an “affirmation-only” model, encouraging young patients to transition without due psychological assessment or caution.

This approach can easily lock vulnerable children into life-altering medical interventions. Rather than helping them explore the roots of their distress, activists have turned the NHS into a conveyor belt of affirmation.

Dr. Hillary Cass, British honorary physician in paediatrics.
Dr. Hillary Cass, British honorary physician in paediatrics.

The Cass Review’s findings earlier this year confirmed that many such practices were unsafe, prompting the closure of the Tavistock clinic.

Despite this, Gendered Intelligence continues to present itself as an expert advisor on “best practice.” The irony is painful: the very ideology that has harmed children’s mental health now claims to be their saviour.

But ‘Gendered Intelligence’ makes no secret of its intentions. Its website says: ‘Gendered Intelligence is a trans-led and trans-involving charity that works to increase understandings of gender diversity and improve the lives of trans people.’ That’s clear enough. It’s not impartial, it’s a trans-promoting mob of partisan activists.

‘Charlie Kye’ Trustee of Gendered Intelligence. Stated pronouns ‘she/her’, since you ask.

Its ‘Meet the Team’ page has everyone referred to by first name (or invented first name) only, as in ‘trustees’: ‘Charlie’, ‘James’, ‘Skip’ and ‘Stone’.

The Charity Commission website along with Companies House identifies two of them as Charlie Kye and James Ramsay William Osborne. The latter is also a trustee and director of ‘STAR: Student Action for Refugees’ (‘Refugees Welcome Here’) and has been a director of a climate change outfit. It would no surprise to find people adopting a fairly hard-left anti-Christian BBC-style stance all through ‘Gendered Intelligence’.

Christians and parents alike must stand watch. When truth is replaced by affirmation and care replaced by compliance, we must speak boldly for the innocent.

Jer 6:14 3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy…Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked.

The Ideology Enters Sport

From classrooms to locker rooms, the reach of this movement has been astonishing. Gendered Intelligence has advised the England and Wales Cricket Board, World Rugby, and British Gymnastics — all in the name of inclusion. But inclusion for whom?

As campaigners like Sex Matters director Fiona McAnena have warned, the organisation’s fingerprints are “all over sports policies” that undermine women’s safety. Even Sport England reportedly paid the charity to produce guidance that encouraged mixed changing facilities, guidance that ignored women’s concerns altogether.

Under this guidance, biological males identifying as women are permitted in female categories, changing rooms, and competitions. The cost to fairness, privacy, and security is staggering. Once again, the rights of the majority have been sacrificed to appease a vocal minority.

In a nation once proud of defending women and children, we now risk institutionalising their erasure.

Isa 3:12 Isaiah 3:12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

Girlguiding and the Loss of Safeguarding

Even Girlguiding, once a beacon of moral leadership, has fallen under activist sway. Gendered Intelligence helped draft its “trans inclusion” policy — a document now facing legal challenge from a concerned parent who claims her daughter’s safety was compromised.

The policy allows biological males identifying as girls to share sleeping quarters, bathrooms, and changing areas with young female members. Girlguiding’s leadership insists the rules are “lawful,” but legality is not the same as morality. Scripture reminds us that what is ‘lawful’ in the eyes of fallen man is not always right in the sight of God.

Isa 55:8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither your ways my ways, saith the LORD. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.

Such policies have created confusion and fear among parents, many of whom now question whether long-trusted organisations are safe spaces for their daughters. This is not progress — it is a moral regression cloaked in rainbow rhetoric.

In the name of equality, innocence is being surrendered. The Church must stand as a shield for those who cannot yet defend themselves.

Matt 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

The Silence of Our Institutions

While major public bodies are distancing themselves from Stonewall’s Diversity Champions Scheme, Gendered Intelligence has quietly stepped in to fill the void. With universities, councils, and broadcasters desperate to appear progressive, its influence has only grown stronger.

The BBC, Ofcom, and Channel 4 are among those eager to show their allegiance to “diversity and inclusion.” Yet what they truly display is moral cowardice — a refusal to defend truth when it becomes unpopular. The gospel of tolerance has replaced the Gospel of Christ.

Christian parents, teachers, and doctors now face increasing pressure to conform or stay silent. Those who hold to biblical truth about creation, gender, and family risk losing their jobs or facing public shame.

We must remember that light shines brightest in darkness. Silence is not an option when truth itself is under siege.

Eph 6:13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

Related Story

Schools defy ministers: children ‘change gender’ without parental knowledge →

Mother banned from seeing sex-ed materials →

Costa promotes mutilation as Government
delays schools “transgender” guidance →

NHS bans puberty blockers for children →

UK in disarray over “puberty blockers” →

Tavistock to Face Legal Action →

Read and pray

READ:

Isa 5:20, Isa 59:14–15; Prov 31:8–9; Matt 6:24; Rom 1:18-32, Gala 6:7; Jhn 1:5
.

PRAY: Pray for truth to prevail in Britain’s institutions
Pray for courage among Christians in education and public life
Pray for the protection of children and the restoration of moral boundaries.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

 

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Nigel Farage: What does the Lord say?

Nigel Farage
Nigel Farage MP

The UK general election has sprung a surprise. Nigel Farage has announced he will stand as a candidate for the Reform UK Party in Clacton. He has also taken over the leadership of Reform UK. So let’s look at Mr Farage.

Stand and Fight!

In a press conference yesterday afternoon, he observed being elected would be difficult, but that: ‘If something is difficult, it doesn’t stop you doing it.’ He would rather ‘stand and fight’ than ‘stand aside’. I am reminded of what David’s army general Joab said to his brother Abishai:

2Sam 10:12 Be of good courage, and let us play the men for our people, and for the cities of our God: and the LORD do that which seemeth him good.

Nigel Farage is certainly a larger-than-life character, and he is a human being, so he is flawed and subject to our human condition. Is he arrogant or merely self-confident? Brashness and directness are not sins, but any of us who want to succeed need humility before the Almighty.

Uphold Christian freedom and repeal ‘woke’ laws →

Criteria for Leadership

We are going to pray into this, but let’s first remind ourselves of the biblical criteria for leadership. Jethro told Moses:

Exod 18:21a Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people (1) able men, (2) such as fear God, (3) men of truth, (4) hating covetousness;

Well, I suggest to you that Nigel Farage may fulfil the third of Jethro’s criteria. He is straightforward. He answers questions. He seems to be a man of truth.

That’s different from so many of our current politicians. You may regard Kemi Badenoch as a breath of fresh air. But even she could not tell the truth about putting the Port Talbot steelmen out of work.

Covetousness vs ability

Mr Farage appears not to be covetous or out to enrich his pals. So that’s would be a contrast with what happened under the Tories with NHS Personal Protection contracts.

Is he an able man, the first criterion? He’s certainly very good at politics. He’s a gifted orator. He has been, as he says, ‘In this game for thirty years’.

If elected, he may find himself in his customary prophetic and activist role rather than in national leadership. That still needs ability from on high.

Support Christian Voice →

The Lord wants God-fearing men

But what about the second one, men ‘Such as fear God’? Well, earlier this year he said he had stopped attending church, blaming the Church of England’s ‘surrender’, as he put it, to the ‘woke agenda’. You may be in the same boat. That may even be a God-fearing position.

Some thirteen years ago, he said: ‘you can be Christian and fun or you can be Christian and be puritanical and want to control everybody.’

Of course, Christians don’t have fun, we don’t enjoy things, we are blessed by them. I’ve been really blessed by standing up in public for the Lord Jesus over the years. OK, it’s fun especially when you see the Lord move in power.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Standing against the elite

But look closely. When this Nigel talked about ‘puritanical’ and wanting ‘to control everybody’ perhaps he was talking prophetically not about Christians but about today’s World Economic Forum influenced political and media establishment.

They were controlling everyone during Covid, and now with Net Zero, and they are nudging you to think as they want you to over transgenderism, racism, geopolitics and climate change, to take just a few obvious examples.

Mr Farage says he is standing up for little people against the elite. Credit where it is due, if he is, and it is hard to discern anyone else doing that, that is a godly position. The psalmist says:
Psa 41:1 Blessed is he that considereth the poor: the LORD will deliver him in time of trouble.

Stand for Righteousness with the Holy Spirit

And from the Proverbs:
Prov 29:7 The righteous considereth the cause of the poor: but the wicked regardeth not to know it.

Where do Reform UK stand on abortion, on sex education, on the UK promoting evil abroad? I am not sure we yet know. And where is a whole-hearted proclamation of our Christian constitution?

When you stand, even imperfectly or in part, for righteousness against the godless elite, you are fighting a spiritual battle. You cannot do that with one arm tied behind your back. You need the spiritual dimension. You need the Holy Spirit.

Prayer

So let’s pray: ‘Almighty God, you reign on high. Scripture says you put down rulers and set them up. You both remove and set up kings. You give wisdom to the wise and to the humble. We pray you do not deal with us after our sins, but instead, Lord, revive your work and in wrath remember mercy.

‘Raise up men after your own heart, my Lord, humble men who will seek your face for wisdom and proclaim Jesus as King of kings. Especially lift up and sustain God-fearing Christian candidates.

‘May your kingdom come and may your will be done on earth as it is in heaven, in our land. For we pray all this from your word in Jesus’s mighty name. Amen.’

Keep in Touch

It will be interesting in the days ahead. So let’s keep in touch. Leave your contact details by signing our petition against woke laws below.

Uphold Christian freedom and repeal ‘woke’ laws →

Share the video and this article, especially with those named in this video, if you know them

Don’t forget, we rely on the Lord’s blessing and your prayers and financial support. Thanks for watching:

Scriptures informing the prayer

Psa 75:7 But God is the judge: he putteth down one, and setteth up another.
Dan 2:21 And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding:
Psa 103:10 He hath not dealt with us after our sins; nor rewarded us according to our iniquities.
Hab 3:2 O LORD, I have heard thy speech, and was afraid: O LORD, revive thy work in the midst of the years, in the midst of the years make known; in wrath remember mercy.
1Sam 13:14a But now thy kingdom shall not continue: the LORD hath sought him a man after his own heart,
Matt 6:10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

‘Britain is a Christian nation’ teacher sacked

2
His Majesty King Charles III kisses the Bible at his Coronation in May 2023
His Majesty King Charles III kisses the Bible at his Coronation in May 2023

A teacher in London has been sacked for telling Muslim children that Britain is a Christian country. He also told the boys off for washing their feet in the hand wash basins in the toilets (‘restroom’ if you’re American).

He told them: ‘Britain is still a Christian state’ and observed that the King is head of the Church of England. Well, it seems you can’t have that going on in England’s capital city with its British values of democracy, the rule of law, liberty, respect and tolerance.

So the school suspended the teacher in March twenty-twenty-four, then sacked him.

Origin of ‘Safeguarding Boards’

A month later he was referred to a ‘safeguarding board’ as well as to the Metropolitan Police, for an alleged hate crime. The Met’s child abuse investigation team even became involved.

The safeguarding officer concluded the teacher had made hurtful comments about Islam and that a child had been subject to emotional harm. The teacher succeeded in appealing the ban but remained sacked. Thank God the police dropped their inquiry.

Did you know ‘Safeguarding Boards’ were set up in two thousand and four after the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in Soham by Ian Huntley, the school caretaker, to protect children from dangers posed by adults working with or around them.

Children ‘safe’ from truth

It has not taken long, has it, for ‘safeguarding’ to be used by woke activists in teaching and sport, against Christians and anyone else whose views do not align with their own Islamo-left or secularist view.

Those in power must keep children ‘safe’ from truth to protect their multicultural antichrist ideology. Because the truth here is that the United Kingdom is constitutionally Christian.

His Majesty King Charles III kisses the Bible at his Coronation in May 2023
His Majesty King Charles III kisses the Bible at his Coronation in May 2023

During his coronation on 6th May twenty-twenty-three, King Charles was anointed by the Archbishop to rule as a Christian monarch, just as Zadok the priest anointed king Solomon in the Bible:

1Kings 1:39a And Zadok the priest took an horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon.

The king kissed the Holy Bible, and made solemn promises to maintain the laws of God in his realm as well as the true profession of the Gospel.

’Wudu’ ritual of feet-washing

From ‘wudumate.com’

This washing the Muslim boys were doing is a religious requirement, by the way.
Muslims are commanded by the Quran in Surah 5 verse 6 to wash their feet as part of the ‘wudu’ ritual. So they wash them in the sink:

Koran, Surah 5 v 6: O ye who believe! when ye prepare for prayer, wash your faces, and your hands (and arms) to the elbows; Rub your heads (with water); and (wash) your feet to the ankles. If ye are in a state of ceremonial impurity, bathe your whole body. (Yusuf Ali’s translation.)

Did you know Muslim boys were doing this in British state schools? It’s a ritual cleansing done before prayer to gain spiritual and physical purity. It’ll take more than that, guys. Whoever you are, it’ll take turning to Jesus for your sins to be forgiven.

As it is written:
1John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

Christianity largest group

The United Kingdom may be constitutionally Christian, and have a long Christian heritage, dating back 1500 years or even longer, but what about current demographics?

In the 2021 census, 46.2% of the population declared themselves Christian in England & Wales, not including Scotland and Northern Ireland, but down from 59.3% in twenty-eleven.

Those of ‘no religion’ were up to 37.2% and Muslims were 6.5%, up from 4.9% in 2011, a thirty-two per-cent increase over ten years.

So Christians are still the largest group, Muslims are growing, and there is a sizeable proportion looking for a spiritual home.

Father banned from football coaching

Jamie Michael (acknowledgements to Free Speech Union)
Jamie Michael (acknowledgements to Free Speech Union)

But this story comes as Jamie Michael, who served with the Royal Marines in the invasion of Iraq in 2003, was reported banned as a football youth coach in the Rhondda Valley for an online post he made after the murders of three children in Southport in July 2024.

Mr Michael posted a 12-minute video in which he said illegal immigrants have ‘the numbers to take over’ the country. He denounced ‘scumbags’ and ‘psychopaths’ and warned the country was ‘under attack’. Mr Michael, a father aged 47, was charged with inciting racial hatred.

At his trial, the veteran said the targets for his criticism had been Southport killer Axel Rudakubana and ‘illegal, unchecked or radicalised immigrants’. He was unanimously cleared by the jury after just 17 minutes.

But after his acquittal, you just know the local safeguarding board will spring into action. They banned him from working with children for his completely lawful video warning. Jamie Michael is suing both the safeguarding board and the Football Association of Wales for £25,000 in damages.

School has a ‘prayer-room

The teacher in our story is now suing the local authority. His lawyers point out the school was non-faith and that prayers had been informally banned from the playground and confined to a prayer room set aside for the purpose.

So it emerges that state schools in this United Kingdom have set aside prayer rooms, not for Christians, but for Muslims. Was that in any party manifesto?

It’s almost as if His Majesty’s Government, our elite, our teaching establishment and civil servants, are ashamed of our Christian heritage and are quietly working against it, without telling you, isn’t it?

Pray for them to repent and return to the Christ of our Christian constitution. Pray the Lord will raise up able, truthful, honest, humble, God-fearing men who are up to that challenge:
Exo 18:21 Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness;

It is written:
Psalm 33:12a Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD;

Sign our petition below.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

Use this UK Parliament link to email your MP →

Previous Articles

Why do NHS staff hate our flags? →

Civil Service funds 500 diversity jobs →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Starmer in Munich: What he means by ‘We’ and ‘Our’

When the world’s elite use common phrases, they don’t mean what you think they mean.

Watch this article in video format:

First Person Plural

Let’s take a look at Sir Keir Starmer’s Valentine’s Day message to his “lovers” at the February 2026 Munich Security Conference.

“His lovers”? I hear you cry. Don’t worry — there’ll be some supporting scripture.

Sir Keir went all pro-EU and anti-Brexit, and that’s what the pro-Brexit media have concentrated on. But I want to look at his use of the first-person plural — “we”, “our” and “ours” — to let you in on the Global Establishment’s world.

Full Script of Sir Keir Starmer’s Speech to the 2026 Munich Security Conference.

Sky’s full video of Sir Keir Starmer’s Speech to the 2026 Munich Security Conference.

Sir Keir Starmer speaking at the Munich Security Conference 2026
Sir Keir Starmer speaking at the Munich Security Conference 2026

I have to set the scene. Obviously, in Western Europe, Russia is a big bogeyman, so that’s where Starmer started: “Russia has proved its appetite for aggression, bringing terrible suffering to the Ukrainian people.”

Ah, geopolitics. It is never entirely as it seems, but that is the EU line, for sure. He went on:

’Our’ Social Contract

“Its hybrid threats extend across our continent, not just threatening our security, but tearing at our social contract.”

“Our” there does not mean yours or mine. It means theirs. It’s their continent, their security, and what they think is their social contract. Because I don’t know how the Russians could have undermined the social contract or social order of the United Kingdom any more than a succession of home-grown politicians over the last twenty-five years.

You’ve had the Tony Blair encouragement of mass migration, the Boris wave, and now the Starmer surge.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Migration over 19 months in office

Illegal Migration by boat across the English Channel

In the nineteen months since Labour came to power in July 2024, a total of 65,922 people — overwhelmingly young men, have crossed the English Channel in small boats.

That’s nudging 850 a week, which is one and a half 581-room Britannia Canary Wharf migrant hotels. The invention of multiculturalism and the flood of Muslims has all but destroyed British society. Jewish people now go in fear of Muslim violence, and Hindus and Christians will be next on the list. That has happened on Keir Starmer’s watch. And he accuses the Russians of “tearing at our social contract”?

He went on to accuse the Russians of: “Collaborating with populists to undermine our values. Using disinformation to sow division. Using cyber-attacks and sabotage to disrupt our lives and deepening the cost-of-living crisis.”

It’s the Russians to blame, not us!

Working backwards — so it’s the Russians to blame for our cost-of-living crisis. It’s nothing to do with the unscriptural tax impositions he and his Chancellor have piled on the people.

“Using disinformation to sow division.” Division here means discussion and debate. He means nothing must compete with government propaganda. Anything contrary is “disinformation”. Well, tough, Keir, you are in the social media age now, and dissenting voices will be heard.

Josh Simons MP is Parliamentary Secretary in the Cabinet Office (appointed 7th September 2025)
Josh Simons MP is Parliamentary Secretary in the Cabinet Office (appointed 7th September 2025)

So the Russians are “collaborating with populists to undermine our values.” I’ve seen no evidence to support that slur, but there is the “our” again — our values. He does not mean your values or mine. He means their values — those of the establishment.

And he persisted with that line only days after the scandal broke where the Labour Together think tank and senior Labour figures, including Josh Simons MP, a government minister, smeared journalists with the same Russia line. (Guardian link above is worth a read!)

’Our’ democracy

By the way, when you hear “our democracy” it’s the same idea. It’s their democracy, that which keeps them in power.

And they are prepared to rip up actual democracy with legal action — in Germany, Romania, France, or in England — to try to stop elections altogether to stop populists gaining office and thereby destroying “their democracy”. Don’t expect logic, justice, truth, or coherence from them.

You know, when ancient Israel received their covenant with God and His laws, they boasted about it, here in Deuteronomy chapter 4:

Deut 4:8 And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous as all this law, which I set before you this day?

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

“The great British values”

So what are the values of the British establishment which are so great?

Drag Queen Tour
Drag Queen Story Hour ‘on tour’

We have gay marriage, drag queen story hour, pornographic sex education, abortion on demand, puberty-blocker trials, net zero, de-industrialisation, welfarism, antisemitism, divorce on demand — none of them in any party manifesto — all just imposed on us by our leaders, leading to unrestrained sexual licence coupled with a declining population, all while harbouring the seeds of an Islamic sectarian takeover, which none of us voted for, but which would be no more than God’s righteous judgment on an elite who have chosen the ways of death.

To be fair, Sir Keir did mention the rule of law. But even that brings to mind the two-tier justice he has encouraged, contrary to scripture, and the Muslim grooming gangs.

Multiculturalism

And yes, multiculturalism — which was never in a manifesto — is one of his values. He said: “True to the vibrant, free, diverse societies that we represent, showing that people who look different to each other can live peacefully together.”

King Charles delivers his woke Christmas Message 2025
King Charles delivers his woke Christmas Message 2025

Tell that to the Jewish synagogue in Manchester, or the victims of the London or Manchester Arena bombings.

He knows the population don’t agree with him, because he argued: “But this isn’t against the tenor of our times.” Increasingly, Prime Minister, it really is. And then, would you believe it — hot on the heels of the King’s Christmas message — out came “diversity is our strength” again: “Rather, it’s what makes us strong, as we’re prepared to defend it with everything that we have.”

Are we? The Psalmist says it is unity which brings a blessing, not diversity:

Psalm 133:1 Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!

EU’s Values

And what of the values of Keir’s EU audience?

Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary
Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary

Last year the European Commission adopted a full LGBTIQ+ equality strategy.

Only last week the European Parliament voted to impose trans ideology across the EU. (Read this approving article: European Parliament Votes Overwhelmingly For “The Full Recognition Of Trans Women As Women”)

Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary, says the danger to his nation comes more from the EU now than from Russia. You can see why.

’We’ will need to fight

Going all warlike, our Prime Minister vowed:“And yes, if necessary, we must be ready to fight. To do whatever it takes to protect our people, our values, and our way of life.”

Did he say “protect our people”? When did the UK or EU elite last prioritise the people over themselves? And look, there are “our values” and “our way of life” popping up again. You know what that means now.

I loved the “we” in “we’re prepared to defend our diversity” and “we must be ready to fight.” Be sure about this. Sir Keir and the assembled dignitaries are not going to any frontline — nor their families. So who are the “we”?

“We” here means they expect you to go to war — and if you are a parent, to send your sons, and to our shame, your daughters, into battle to protect their values and their very comfortable way of life.

Gen-Z reluctant to fight for Britain

Well, a survey conducted last year by The Times in partnership with YouGov showed that only 1 in 10 of military-age Gen Z (18–27) would fight for Britain. Only two in five are proud of their country. Back in 2004, a similar survey found twice as many expressing pride.

Hermann Goering
Hermann Goering was LuftReichsmarschall in Nazi Germany, in charge of its air force.

Forty-one percent of today’s Gen Z said in no circumstances would they take up arms for their country. If the Russians were landing on the beaches the response could be different, but it may well be that after Covid, Net Zero, and their failure to define a woman, Gen Z — like many of us — do not trust a word of what our current leaders say about the alleged Russian threat, or anything.

The propaganda, which Hermann Goering famously said is all those in power need to get ordinary people to sign up, might not work any more in the social media age — of which, as we saw earlier, the ruling class are terrified.

Sir Keir’s ‘lovers’

So now you know the language and the mindset of the elite. And what about Sir Keir’s “lovers”? That leads to our prayer. When ancient Israel went away from the Lord, the prophet Ezekiel stressed the spiritual aspect and likened their treachery to adultery as they trusted in alliances with pagan nations:

Ezekiel 16:33 They give gifts to all whores: but thou givest thy gifts to all thy lovers, and hirest them, that they may come unto thee on every side for thy whoredom.

When he wrote that, it was already too late. Israel, followed by Judah, had gone into captivity. The judgment had fallen.

Chagossians Misley Mandarin (left) and his father on  Île du Coin in the Chagos Islands
Chagossians Misley Mandarin (left) and his father in occupation (Feb 2026) on Île du Coin in the Chagos Islands

And today, Ezekiel’s words perfectly sum up Sir Keir’s Chagos surrender, as well as giving away fishing rights to the EU, planned EU “dynamic alignment”, his kow-towing to China over their spy embassy in London, and their imprisonment of journalist Jimmy Lai.

And the man even had the effrontery to tell the Munich elite: “And I will always fight for what’s best for my country.” (Check out our story and video on Keir Starmer’s Art of the Deal)

Pray for the Lord to raise up able, humble, God-fearing, honest men of truth to lead us. (Exod 18:21)

Because unless and until our smug, self-satisfied establishment once more trust and obey the Lord Jesus — the King of kings of our Christian constitution — then our nation is finished, invaded, and it won’t be the Russians doing it.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Related articles

Why King’s 2025 Christmas Message was ‘on-message’ →

Keir Starmer pledges to create a role to support LGBT rights if he is PM →

Is Keir Starmer’s Art of the Deal more sinister than we thought? →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Is Keir Starmer’s Art of the Deal more sinister than we thought?

0
Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP, UK Prime Minister
Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP, UK Prime Minister

In an article for Spiked Online, Columnist Simon Evans parodied Donald Trump’s ‘Art of the Deal’ as ‘Keir Starmer’s Art of the Deal’.

Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP, UK Prime Minister
Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP, UK Prime Minister

The UK PM, said Mr Evans, ‘is shaping up to be the worst negotiator in political history’.

I’m going to take a sideways look at Keir Starmer’s deal-making, because I think Mr Evans might be starting from the quite reasonable presumption that a British Prime Minister naturally has the best interests of the United Kingdom at heart, and because of sheer inability, the current occupier of that august office has simply botched it.

I’m not so sure of all that. The truth of the matter could be far, far more serious.

The Chagos Island Deal

Policy Exchange were among many to raise the security implications of Sir Keir's 'Chagos Island Deal, but the Prime Minister ignored them.
Policy Exchange were among many to raise the security implications of Sir Keir’s ‘Chagos Island Deal, but the Prime Minister ignored them.

Let me explain. As evidence, Simon Evans brought in Sir Keir’s Chagos Islands deal.

The Prime Minister signed this deal in May 2025. It is likely to cost the UK Treasury 10 times the initially quoted £3.4 billion over the next century. If Britain in any recognisable form is still here.

We are leasing back our own Diego Garcia military base for 99 years. And Sir Keir has even handed the homeland of the actual Chagossians to another country. ‘It is hard to find anything but abject defeat in this deal,’ says Mr Evans.

Closer to home, he cites Mr Starmer’s ‘one-in-one-out’ migrant-exchange deal with France.
‘Nearly 1,000 migrants have arrived via small boat since only the beginning of this week’, complains Mr Evans.

Now add in Sir Keir’s deal with the EU, his deal with India, both of which, says Mr Evans, did harm to the UK, and what more evidence do you need?

Son of Toolmaker ‘is bad Dealmaker’

Simon Evan's caricature for his articles in Spiked Online.
Simon Evan’s caricature for his articles in Spiked Online.

Simon Evans concludes that the son of a presumably good toolmaker is a poor dealmaker. But maybe, just maybe, Mr Evans is missing the point.

What if advancing the United Kingdom is not the metric by which to judge the Starmer’s deal-making?

He would not be the first Prime Minister with an opposite objective from that which you and Mr Evans believed he naturally would have.

David Cameron, for instance, thought more of promoting gay rights in Africa than trade with Africa. While British envoys were solemnly attaching LGBT strings to proposed trade deals, the Russians were doing deals across the continent without any such baggage.

It’s all about what you want to achieve. For Mr Cameron, it was gay rights, not British interests. For his successor Theresa May, it was climate activism and Net Zero which came before the prosperity of the United Kingdom.

Boris Johnson continued that idea and put appeasing Big Pharma and his hapless health advisors before the liberties and real health of the British people during the Covid.

Sacred Cows

David Cameron awarded as gay 'Ally of the Year' in 2016
David Cameron was gay ‘Ally of the Year’ in 2016

So what if Sir Keir has the same mentality, but this time, as they say, on steroids?

What if he is always consciously putting his sacred cows of multiculturalism, globalism, open borders, NetZero, de-industrialisation, British guilt, accommodation, appeasement, ‘moral leadership’, also known as virtue signalling, a long way before any actual British interests which might annoyingly occur to him?

If we adopt that assumption as our starting point, then, in every deal, Sir Keir has manifestly achieved his aims.

But it goes without saying that, outside the elite, the blob, the quangocracy, British people rather want their leaders to prosper them and the United Kingdom and be, as scripture says:

Exod 18:21 … able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness;

The Prime Minister should be, as the Apostle Paul says in Romans 13:

Romans 13:4 … the minister of God to thee for good.

If you agree, join us in praying for the Lord to raise up men like that and sign our petition below:

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

How bad was the Eighteenth Century?

1
William Hogarth: Gin Lane (1751)
William Hogarth: Gin Lane (1751)

We’ve come across two hymns written at least two hundred and fifty years ago. Both call us to look at ourselves in the light of history and both speak to our day in calling for national repentance.

Sign our petition while you are here:

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

When Abram full of sacred awe

Elizabeth Scott (1708-1776) penned ‘When Abram Full of Sacred Awe’ in the middle of the Eighteenth Century. It was published in 1769.

Actually, the Lord had already changed his name to Abraham by the time he was pleading for Sodom (in Gen 18:19-33), but Miss Scott thought it best to fit her thoughts in to Common Metre, or four lines with syllables thus: 8.6.8.6. (We sing this to the tune ‘Cheshire’.) So she begins:

1. When Abra’m full of sacred awe, before Jehovah stood,
and with a humble, fervent prayer, for guilty Sodom sued;

Her second verse describes the wonderful result of his prayer:

2. With what success, what wondrous grace, was his petition crowned!
The Lord would spare, if in the place ten righteous men be found.

Of what was Britain ‘guilty’?

The man of God did not dare go below the Hebrew number for a congregation, but even then, he pitched his request too high. As Elizabeth Scott goes on:

3. And could a single holy soul so rich a boon obtain?
Great God, and shall thy remnant cry and plead with thee in vain?

No-one could be found in Sodom except righteous Lot, his wife and his weird daughters. Not even their husbands believed Lot’s warning of impending destruction (Gen 19:1-19). But why did she move on immediately to citing God’s remnant in her own day? And what does Miss Scott mean in the next verse by this:

4. Britain, all guilty as she is, her several saints confess,
And now their fervent prayers ascend; and can those prayers be lost?

See gracious God before thy throne

Our other eighteenth-century hymn was published in 1760 and written by Miss Scott’s contemporary Anne Steele, (1717-1778). It is also in CM (we use the tune ‘Burford’) and begins with six verses making a case for repentance and reformation. Here are the first four:

1. See gracious God, before Thy throne, Thy mourning people bend;
‘Tis on Thy grace in Christ alone, Our failing hopes depend.
2. Tremendous judgments from Thy hand, Thy dreadful power display;
Yet mercy spares this guilty land, And still we live to pray.
3. Great God! and why is Britain spared? Ungrateful as we are;
O make thy awful warnings heard, While mercy cries, Forbear!
4. What numerous crimes increasing rise, Through this apostate isle!
What land as favoured of the skies, And yet what land so vile!

Seventeenth Century upheavals

So what was going on in their day to inspire these two ladies to speak of Britain’s guilt? Was not the Eighteenth Century, Georgian Britain, prospering and growing with an expanding empire? Did not Britannia rule the waves?

The previous century had seen great upheaval. The throne of England and Wales became united with that of Scotland in 1603 under James VI/I, him of King James Bible fame. He was Protestant and targeted by the conspirators of the Gunpowder Plot in 1605. King James died in 1625. His son, Charles I, became arrogant and thought he was above parliament. That led to a dreadful civil war and to the king’s execution in 1649.

The Commonwealth lasted until 1660. Parliament restored the monarchy in the shape of Charles II. But his son James II was adjudged a Roman Catholic activist and was deposed in 1688.

Support Christian Voice →

The Glorious Revolution

Parliament brought James’s Protestant daughter Mary and her husband, William of Orange, over from the Netherlands in 1689, and enthroned them as joint rulers. Christians, that is virtually everyone of the time, gave thanks to God for this bloodless ‘Glorious Revolution’.

After that tumultuous Seventeenth Century, William and Mary’s daughter Queen Anne reigned from 1702 to 1714. Climate change had brought about the ‘Little Ice Age’ by now. The low point was the Great Frost of 1709, when the ground froze to a depth of three feet during a terrible period of starvation and death from January to April. The Great Frost was followed by a severe economic depression. The Guardian explains how the cold left the economy in ruins: ‘Per capita gross domestic product dropped by 23%, and did not fully recover for another 10 years, all from a single terrible winter.’

Anne was succeeded by her son George I, the first of the Hanoverians, in 1714. Now hymn writer Isaac Watts would give thanks in his hymn ‘To thee most holy and most high’ for deliverance from popery and for the ‘happy accession’ of King George.

William Hogarth: Gin Lane (1751)
William Hogarth: Gin Lane (1751)

Drunkenness and depravity

The optimism was not to last. The economy recovered, but the people fell into sin. Thirty-seven years later, in 1751, now under George II, William Hogarth engraved the illustrations ‘Beer Street’ and ‘Gin Lane’, castigating the drunkenness and depravity of London.

John Wesley was preaching on sin and redemption up and down the land from 1727 until weeks before his death in March 1791.

Nine years after Hogarth’s satires, as Miss Steele was printing her hymn and George III was acceding to the throne, in 1760, ‘Harris’s List of Covent Garden Ladies’ was first published. It was a blatant directory of London prostitutes. The ‘List’ was in print, constantly updated, until 1794.

It was estimated that 6,000 – 7,000 mainly working-class women were earning a living from prostitution at the time in London alone. Another estimate is 50,000, which seems improbable out of a population of just 650,000. 6-7,000 is surely bad enough. John Wesley preached at least one sermon against prostitution, in the Covent Garden area of Seven Dials, in January 1763.

Elizabeth Scott and Anne Steele speak to our day

John Wesley, by George Romney
John Wesley preached from 1727 to his death in 1791. Picture by George Romney

Crime and venereal disease were rampant in the time when Wesley preached. Elizabeth Scott’s lines lead us to conclude homosexuality was also part of the sorry picture:

5. Are not thy righteous dear to thee
Now, as in ancient times?
Or does this guilty land
exceed Gomorrah in its crimes?

Anne Steele seems to have agreed, even if words change their meaning over time:

5. How changed, alas, are truths divine,
For error, guilt and shame!
Impious numbers, bold in sin,
Disgrace the Christian name!
6. Regardless of thy smile or frown,
Their pleasures they require;
And sink with gay indifference down,
To everlasting fire.

There was indeed an effeminate homosexual sub-culture of ‘Molly Houses’ existing at the time. It is sobering, if the expression does not fall too awkwardly in a discussion of the eighteenth century, to recognise our own times in the world about which Miss Scott and Miss Steele wrote.

Not only was theirs a prophetic voice in their own time, but they speak to ours today.

Suppression of vice

When Miss Scott and Miss Steele were writing their hymns, Messrs Hogarth and Wesley were just about the sum of the century’s reformers. It is true that William Wilberforce was born in 1759 but neither lady would live to see him elected to Parliament in 1780.

Nevertheless, the MP, together with Bishop Beilby Porteus, successfully petitioned King George III for a Royal Proclamation in June 1787 to suppress vice and honour the Lord’s Day.

John Wesley wrote to Wilberforce to encourage him in his fight to end slavery in the last letter he wrote, days before his death.

A ‘new thing’ in our land, in our day

As the writer of Ecclesiastes puts it:
Eccl 1:9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.

However, there is one ‘new thing’ in our day which our hymn writers would not recognise. It may well be that politicians of their time were involved in the sins of their day. But they were not advancing them as good things. Hogarth’s paintings shocked because the viewers, politicians among them, recognised he had a valid point.

Today, the entire British establishment is promoting the sins of homosexuality, transgenderism and abortion both at home and abroad, even to young children in ‘relationships and sex education’. The State actively promoting evil, spitting in the face of God, has only ever been done once in history, in Sodom and Gomorrah, in the Days of Lot.

And that did not end well:
Gen 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The hymn writers’ prayers

The hymns ‘When Abram full of sacred awe’ and ‘See gracious God’ both end with prayers. There are also today those in our land who bear the name of Jesus. God dwells within us. Our Constitution yet owns the name above every name. We have a great spiritual heritage in the Lord Jesus. This land was founded upon the word of God. We can follow the writer of the epistle:

Heb 4:16 Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.

Therefore we can in confidence pray Miss Scott’s concluding verse and prayer:

6. Still there are those who bear thy name, here yet is thine abode;
Long has thy presence blessed our land; forsake us not, O God!

Anne Steele’s last two verses go further. They call for repentance and for our rulers to seek the face of the King of kings. Her words have additional force when she prophetically speaks of ‘insulting’ invaders. Even then, she writes that we can be fearless, but only if our elite have drawn the nation close to God:

7. O turn us, turn us, mighty Lord, By thy resistless grace;
Then shall our hearts obey thy word, And humbly seek thy face;
8. Then, should insulting foes invade, We shall not sink in fear;
Secure of never-failing aid, If God, our God, is near.

Join your prayers with ours as we pray for national repentance:

How to Join or Support Christian Voice →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Hamish de Bretton Gordon and Doctors Under Fire – FO Sock-Puppets

Hamish de Bretton-Gordon has a platform from 'Doctors Under Fire' to promote the UK-Government position of Syria
Hamish de Bretton-Gordon has a platform from 'Doctors Under Fire' to promote the UK-Government position of Syria

Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon has a platform from 'Doctors Under Fire' to promote the UK-Government position on Syria
Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon has a platform from ‘Doctors Under Fire’ to promote the UK-Government position on Syria

BBC television news ran a piece bemoaning the bombardment of the rebel-held East Ghouta area of Damascus on Tuesday morning 20/02/2018.  They interviewed Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, supposedly representing ‘Doctors Under Fire’.  What he said could have been scripted by the UK’s Foreign Office.

Watch our Video Here.  (All links in this story open automatically in a new tab.)

The Syrian army is trying to recapture the jihadist-controlled enclave.  De Bretton-Gordon appeared to be arguing for injured and sick children to be allowed to leave.

For De Bretton-Gordon, everything bad happening in East Ghouta seemed to be the fault of ‘Assad’ and ‘Putin’.  The Al-Qaeda offshoot Jabhat al Nusra which holds the area held for him no responsibility at all.

Even the UN Security Council has declared Al Nusra a terrorist organization.  These Islamists control the Idlib enclave as well.  They have torched churches and beheaded opponentsFurther evidence here.  And De Bretton-Gordon had not one single critical word to say about them.

Liberation of Aleppo

"<yoastmark

Civilians were under fire, he went on.  He failed to mention that Al-Nusra might be holding them as human shields, as they did in Eastern Aleppo.  The Syrian army liberated that area in December twenty-sixteen.

The UNHCR tweeted in October last year: ‘After years of darkness, city of is lit at night, we hope that find light at the end of the tunnel finally

We ran a report on Aleppo’s liberation at the time.

For the first time in five years the city’s Christians were able to celebrate Christmas free from constant bombardment from the Al-Nusra terrorists in the east .

Celebrating Christmas in Aleppo December 2016.
Celebrating Christmas in Aleppo December 2016.

The US and UK Governments and the mainstream media hated the liberation of Eastern Aleppo. They will equally bewail the liberation of Eastern Ghouta, when it comes.

Indeed, during the BBC interview, Hamish de Bretton-Gordon came across as nothing more than a UK government sock-puppet.  He confirmed this when he commended what he said were ‘the peace talks in Geneva’.  We shall come to that below.

Doctors Under Fire

Mr David Nott is a respected surgeon but blames 'Assad' for everything.
Mr David Nott is a respected surgeon but blames ‘Assad’ for everything.

But what of this man, and what of ‘Doctors Under Fire’?  Well, the latter has apparently just two members, De Bretton Gordon and one David Nott, a surgeon who has been in war-torn areas.  Mr Nott similarly finds no good word to say about the Syrian government.

Oddly, in a video on Vimeo from 2016 he says Doctors Under Fire will be a charity. The Charity Commission has no record of it, nor of ‘Medics under Fire’ which is what the Doctors Under Fire website is called.  When you go to the website, at this time of writing, you’re invited to a rally on 7th May.  On further investigation, that is 7th May 2016.  Their website is two years out of date.  Of course hospitals should not be attacked in war zones, but the Doctors Under Fire platform gives Messrs De B-G and Nott credibility to advance another agenda.

Hospital bombing scam

Furthermore, this astonishing video collated all the times the ‘last hospital’ in eastern Aleppo was put out of action by ‘Syrian regime airstrikes’.   Can you guess how many it was?  And how do the mainstream media source their footage of sick children, hospitals, and dare we add, ‘doctors under fire’?   They are entirely dependent on the terrorists.  No western journalist can venture into their areas.  Why?  For fear of being kidnapped and held for ransom by the very people they champion.

De Bretton Gordon also claimed on the BBC a hospital in eastern Ghouta had been hit.   That was why they gave him a platform under his ‘Doctors Under Fire’ persona.   But again, it was second-hand terrorist propaganda.  Here, the impressive ‘Off-Guardian’ website exposes the Syrian totem head of the ‘White Helmets’, which was a British Foreign Office creation, as we investigated here.  This relentless tugging at western heart-strings is a scam and the msm know it.

Hamish de Bretton-Gordon

SecureBio spun off from Hamish De Bretton-Gordon's time in the British Army
SecureBio spun off from Hamish De Bretton-Gordon’s time in the British Army

Hamish de Bretton-Gordon is a retired Colonel with an OBE.  He commanded NATO’s Rapid Reaction Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Battalion. He ran a company called SecureBio with, we read on this ‘military speakers’ website, ‘an impressive list of blue chip clients globally.’  However, Companies House says SecureBio resolved to go into liquidation in June 2015.

The Colonel now apparently works for a company which makes breathing masks, Avon Protection.  His LinkedIn profile claims he is ‘Managing Director CBRN’ of Avon, despite not actually being a director.  He also claims still to be director of SecureBio.  He does not mention that company was dissolved in August 2017 with debts over £715,000.

Call for France to drop bombs on Syria

De Bretton-Gordon has teamed up with Avon Protection which makes breathing masks.
De Bretton-Gordon has teamed up with Avon Protection which makes breathing masks.

De Bretton-Gordon teamed up with Avon in 2014.  Avon then took over the SecureBio name in June 2015 as SecureBio Ltd shut down.  Avon did not take over SecureBio Ltd’s large debts.

De Bretton-Gordon no longer has any connection with military field-work.  Nevertheless, he has continued access to the world’s media when subjects like Syria and alleged chemical weapons come up.

Securebio’s YouTube channel is still online and has a number of videos of the colonel calling for ‘safe havens’ for terrorists.  He has appeared frequently on Sunni-Muslim Qatar’s Al Jazeera TV channel.

And as this Guardian opinion piece shows, he is not slow to blame ‘Assad’ and ‘Putin’ for each and every alleged chemical attack, just as the UK Foreign Office would want him to do.  In this belligerent BBC article he even calls on France to declare war by dropping bombs on Syria.

Geneva vs Astana Peace Talks

"<yoastmark

Finally, why did the Colonel’s promotion of the Geneva peace talks raise the alarm?  Because this is a UK-driven political view.  In reality the Geneva talks stalled in February twenty-seventeen.  The Kurds took against the inconsequential opposition in exile pompously called the High Negotiations Committee.

The Geneva talks finally collapsed in November when the Syrians would not agree to President Assad stepping aside, a key, but stupid, UK and US demand.  The Guardian’s highly-respected Patrick Wintour says the talks De Bretton Gordon extols are ‘perilously shorn of credibility’.

Meanwhile, the real peace talks, unmentioned by the Colonel, have been held in Astana, capital of Kazakhstan. They are brokered by Russia, so the UK wants them to fail.  But the UN’s Staffan de Mistura says the Astana talks are making small but ‘clear progress’ to reducing violence in Syria.  They have now moved to Sochi on the Black Sea and we need to pray for them.

Terrorists should lay down their arms

Make no mistake, the UK government helped start the dreadful civil war in Syria.  Even now its tame media pundits cannot bear the idea that the Islamic terrorists we assisted are mercifully losing.

They need to lay down their arms. But don’t expect the Colonel to agree. The Bible says in Psalm 120:7:

I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.

Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon will keep ringing the UK Government bell.  A knighthood cannot be far away.  But we must take what he and the rest of the BBC’s pro-Foreign Office pundits say with a very large pinch of salt.

Why do NHS staff hate our flags?

On Remembrance Day, 11th November 2025, I read that St George’s flags are creating “no-go zones” for NHS staff.

The Daily Telegraph reported ‘several NHS trust chief executives and leaders’ claiming that staff feel ‘intimidated by the presence of the flags across the country, including when they are visiting people in their own homes to give them treatment’.

OK, that may be reflecting no more than their own preconceptions and prejudices, because a poll of senior managers found 77 per cent, over three quarters of them, concerned, they said, about discrimination towards NHS staff from patients and the public.

Antisemitism of NHS staff

Evil: Dr Rahmeh Aladwan cannot stop her Islam-mandated hatred of Jews.
Evil: Dr Rahmeh Aladwan cannot stop her Islam-mandated hatred of Jews.

They don’t seem concerned about discrimination from NHS staff towards patients and the public, do they? I don’t notice any condemnation or even recognition of the discrimination and antisemitism on open display from Muslim doctors, nurses and staff wearing ‘free palestine’ badges. (See Surgeon struck off. Doctor Suspended. Nurse ‘antisemitic’. PostScript 28/11/25: Dr Rahmeh Aladwan has now been struck off, but only for 15 months, and promptly went on another antisemitic rant.)

Anyway, one trust leader, speaking anonymously, said there were particular difficulties for staff working in the community.

He or she said: “We saw during the time when the flags went up – our staff, who are a large minority of black and Asian staff, feeling deliberately intimidated.

“It felt like the flags were up creating no go zones. That’s what it felt like to them.”

Oppose Islamophobia Definition →

Spiritual problem with flags

Well, anonymous trust leader probably thinks he or she is making an argument against the display of our national and union flags. But in fact, he or she is actually saying that these foreign, or even UK-born, staff do not feel any affection to this host nation.

That they hate or despise, or feel uncomfortable with, British national symbols.

Or are they associating them with protests against current levels of illegal Muslim migration? It is that connection by which these staff feel ‘deliberately intimidated’? In which case this might not be so much of a racial problem with our flags as a religious one, a spiritual one even.

Could it be it is Muslim staff who feel the most uncomfortable with a flag with the cross of Jesus Christ, the King of kings, on it?

Christian heritage & constitution

That flag and the Union flag remind us of our Christian heritage, our Christian constitution, our historical background as a Christian nation. All of that is what we, that is all of us, should respect and honour.

It’s just like what the Bible says about the Jewish Passover:
Exod 12:14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.

You see how a nation has to know where it has come from.

The prophet Joel says this about a significant day:
Joel 1:3 Tell ye your children of it, and let your children tell their children, and their children another generation.

Join or Support Christian Voice →

No cohesion

King Charles lays a wreath in a Christian service at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday
King Charles lays a wreath in a Christian service at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday

That’s why we have Remembrance Sunday and Remembrance Day. The clue to the purpose of it is in the name.

And I venture that few of those who don’t care for our flags with the cross on them were found at a local remembrance Sunday service, or tuning in to watch the ceremony at the Cenotaph.

No nation can long survive if the people within it do not remember, honour and respect, even love, its heritage, its cultural symbols. There is no cohesion in a nation with a significant proportion of the population half-in-half-out.

Especially is there no cohesion in a nation wherein lie a significant proportion of the population who want to impose an alien faith and political system.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

No-go zone for Jews

Jews were segregated in the face of Muslim intimidation at Villa Park
Jews were segregated in the face of Muslim aggression at Villa Park

And if an NHS trust leader voices concerns about ‘No-Go Zones’, what about the Muslim majority one around Villa Park Football Ground, which a football match has revealed is a no-go zone for Jews and those standing with them.

Going back to the NHS and both its staff and its staffing, obviously the nation’s health service should be training indigenous staff. I won’t go all holy and say that’s ‘wisdom’ but it’s surely common sense.

But there is obviously a problem which NHS trust leaders have identified with Muslim staff in this Christian nation which may turn up the very Jewish people their religion commands them to hate and destroy as patients.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Elite must turn to the Lord

So given that, and their disaffection with our nation and its Christian heritage, is it not looking increasingly as if this is their time to leave?

Pray into that, and pray for your MP, our king and those who bear rule in his name. May the Lord open their spiritual eyes to see this challenge as God sees it.

Scripture says:
Isa 42:8 I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.

Our elite must turn back to him who alone can save us.

READ: Psalm 9:17, 33:12; Isa 9:6-7; Dan 7:13-14; Matt 2:11; 1Cor 15:25; Eph 1:20-21; 1Tim 2:5, 6:5,13-15; Heb 1:3-4; Rev 1:5, 17:14, 19:11-16.

Use this UK Parliament link to email your MP →

Previous Articles

Charles: Synagogue Attack ‘Out of the Blue’? →

Grooming Gangs Inquiry Stitch-up →

Jewish fans banned from Villa Park →

Muslims slaughter Christians in Nigeria →

UK elite promoted antisemitism →

How the BBC promoted Islamic State →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

No, Angela, Prince Andrew is not a ‘nonce’

4

According to a new book on the Labour Party, Angela Rayner described the Duke of York as a “nonce” as she lobbied for him to be stripped of his official duties after the death of Queen Elizabeth II.

Angela Rayner
Angela Rayner

A “nonce” is a colloquial term for a paedophile. Some believe the word is an acronym of “Not On Normal Courtyard Exercise”, supposedly displayed on the doors of prisoners who should be kept away from other inmates for their own safety. Convicts, just like some of us, are keen to have those they can look down
upon.

But does the Duke of York fit into that category, as the Angela contends?

Virginia Roberts Giuffre

She was referring, of course, to alleged encounters between the Prince and one Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who claims to have had intimate relations with him three times when she was seventeen. She sent a text to a friend boasting about
it.

Carolyn Andriano says: “I asked her if she’d been to the palace. And she said ‘I got to sleep with him’. She didn’t seem upset about it. She thought it was pretty cool.”

Virginia Giuffre was actually a prostitute, and according to the sister of her former boyfriend, she also recruited other girls for Jeffrey Epstein. She was no innocent party. Now seventeen might be under-age in a handful of US states, but most set the age of consent at sixteen. It is sixteen in the United Kingdom.

Support Christian Voice →

Age or State of consent?

The Bible, interestingly, does not specify an age of consent, only a state of consent, which is holy matrimony. The Statute of Westminster first brought in the concept of an age of consent in these islands in twelve seventy-five. It stood at twelve years of age, more or less, until eighteen eighty-five, when it was raised to sixteen.

If Prince Andrew did sleep with Ms Giuffre, which he denies, then he was a fornicator, a whoremonger, and a fool.

Although to flee fornication, as the Bible commands, when an attractive young woman is throwing herself at you, needs not just the Christian faith, but the grace of God as well. You might not see evidence of either in the Duke of York. But he was not a paedophile. He was not a ‘nonce’, as the Rayner insult would have it. Watch the video here:

Arrogant, insensitive, but a war hero

I am not hoisting a flag for the Duke of York. The reports, even from his own late father, cast him as an arrogant, insensitive man who looks down on ordinary people.

The Royal family were once watching Coronation Street. ‘Oh God, look at all those common people,’Andrew shouted. Prince Philip gave him a rocket. ‘If it wasn’t for people like that,’ he said, ‘you would not be sitting here.’

He was less than convincing, or even empathetic, in his ill-advised Emily Maitlis interview.

On the other hand, he is a war hero, who bobbed up and down in a helicopter being a lure for Exocet missiles during the Falklands War.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

What does the Bible say?

Politicians, leaders, are supposed, according to the Bible’s specification in Exodus 18 and verse 21, to be ‘able men, such as fear God, men of truth,hating covetousness’.

Did you spot that: able, humble ‘men of truth’. Not arrogant, but not slanderers or attention seekers either.

The Bible says:
Lev 19:16 Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people

Maybe the Angela likes to have someone she can look down upon, just like those lags in jail. But I just don’t see scripture saying that is a qualification for high office, do you?

Related Stories

King Charles preaches Net Zero at COP28 →

PRAY: Pray for our leaders. Lord, make them able, humble, truthful, honest men of God-Or replace them with those who will be.
And pray for Christian Voice.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

‘Common Purpose’ outed

Sir David Bell of Common Purpose - right behind Sir Brian Leveson (r)

Sir David Bell of Common Purpose – right behind Sir Brian Leveson (r)

The antics of a sinister left-of-centre freemasonry need consideration by those of us concerned about the elite and the quangocracy. But scripture can encourage us in our prayer.

In November 2012, Richard Pendlebury, an investigative journalist on the Daily Mail, put together a series of articles on the activities and people behind a shadowy elitist training school called ‘Common Purpose’:

See: Dark Arts and links with the Masters of Spin

And: The influence of ‘people who know best’

Also: A careful response from the Guardian

And: A good summing up in the Telegraph

Common Purpose runs expensive leadership courses mainly for public sector employees, largely because only the public sector can afford its fees of £5,000 for a week’s attendance.

Richard Pendlebury

One cannot always trust what the Daily Mail says, and in attacking those campaigning for restrictions on the press, it can be accused of fighting its own corner as the Leveson Report looms rather than exposing chicanery in high places.

Nevertheless, Mr Pendlebury is an award-winning journalist and his articles are replete with well-researched links between personnel and based on documents and statements in the public sphere.  Chief among the people identified is Sir David Bell, a top fixer in the Leveson Enquiry and a trustee of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which falsely linked Lord McAlpine to the Wrexham paedophile scandal.  Sir David is indeed a trustee of the Common Purpose Charitable Trust, whose purpose statement claims: ‘Our educational courses give people the inspiration, skills and connections to become better leaders.’

Common Purpose International is linked by personnel to the Common Purpose Charitable Trust and aims to establish Common Purpose operating organisations in countries outside the UK.  It says ‘All Common Purpose operating organisations aim to give leaders the inspiration, the knowledge and the connections they need to produce real change.’

Even the Guardian’s Michael White was grudgingly appreciative of the ‘Mail’ article and Richard Pendlebury, writing: ‘Bell is a good Mail target because he’s highly visible in the octopus as a former Social Democrat party member and ex-chairman of Pearsons with links to other quango-crats named by the paper.’

The idea of constant or nebulous ‘change’ with no qualification or explanation or what it entails is a Marxist concept within which the Common Purpose website feels right at home. Common Purpose graduates acquire skills in ‘group dynamics’ equipping them to manipulate meetings. EDI features heavily. There again, an elitism present in Common Purpose is exemplified in its constant assertion that it provides ‘connections’. Certainly its Chief Executive, Julia Middleton, has become extremely well-connected to the liberal establishment through Common Purpose.  She is director and company secretary of the Media Standards Trust, financial backers of the ‘Hacked Off” campaign and no end of feminist groups.  In 1994, she helped set up the left-of-centre think-tank Demos. Look for a comment by ‘The Trician’ about her here. She is married to the equally well-connected financier Rupert Middleton.

Julia Middleton – ‘the best-connected woman you’ve never heard of’.

While campaigning for transparency elsewhere, the Common Purpose website has a password-protected inner core and refuses to publish a list of its ‘graduates’.  But they include some 35,000 mainly public-sector employees, journalists, police officers – the Met spent tens of thousands of pounds on Common Purpose courses under Sir Ian Blair – and aspiring politicians.  Nor is Common Purpose any more forthcoming – or eager to comply with company law – over disclosing the home addresses of its directors. Most of them claim to live at the Common Purpose office in Banner Street, EC1.

Common Purpose tried to blacken the name of people doing Freedom of Information searches on it, and it would not be beyond the bounds of possibility to suspect that if a group of Common Purpose graduates have the down on someone in a locality, that they could do him serious financial damage.

The most subversive aspect of the Common Purpose mindset is the one hiding in plain sight, the concept of leading ‘beyond authority’. It is even the subject of a book by Mrs Middleton.  According to the Common Purpose website:

‘Many successful leaders learn to lead in roles or circumstances where they have clear authority, budget and accountability. When they move beyond this – leading peers, partners and stakeholders – the skills that brought them success may not be enough. To operate effectively they need a different approach to leadership – the ability to Lead Beyond Authority.’

What that means is that CP people are trained to interfere in matters which are not their responsibility in order to effect the changes in policy (EDI, etc) they want to see. Even the Guardian’s Michael White is alarmed: ‘In her book Beyond Authority, Middleton – as quoted by the Mail – writes cheerfully of using “charm and flattery” to place a “conventional useful idiot” into a job which would be a “perfect smokescreen” for a chum’s agenda. Such tactics need watching.’

The Guardian described Common Purpose as ‘well-meaning’.  But what Common Purpose plot and plan is likely to benefit themselves and their pet causes first and the rest of us and righteousness a long way second. Pray that the Lord will bring their devices to naught:

Psalm 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.

Matt 10:26 Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.

Support us

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

We should make clear that we welcome comments, but only from those prepared to submit a real email address.  Comments giving a false email address will go in the trash bin.

Nurses Expose Britain’s Transgender Moral Confusion

A group of nurses from County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust (CDDFT) have lodged an employment tribunal case for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment.
A group of nurses from County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust (CDDFT) have lodged an employment tribunal case for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment.

Rose (Tyler) Henderson - just a large woman?
Rose (Tyler) Henderson – just a large woman?

At Darlington Memorial Hospital, eight nurses have been hauled before an employment tribunal. This follows raising concerns about being forced to undress in front of a biological male colleague.

The nurses, including Bethany Hutchison, Lisa Lockey, and Karen Danson, complained that “Rose Henderson”, a man ‘identifying’ as a woman, was permitted to use the female changing rooms.

Instead of safeguarding the women’s privacy, NHS managers ordered “kindness training” for the complainants and warned them to “broaden their mindset” and “be more inclusive.”

Ludicrously, the NHS trust are claiming in court that ‘Rose’, whose real name is Tyler and who is built like a brick outhouse, is just like a ‘large woman’.

Nurse Bethany Hutchison told a tribunal how she and colleagues were forced to undergo the training after complaining about a colleague Credit: Iain Masterton

One nurse, a survivor of child sexual abuse, told the tribunal that seeing the male colleague half-dressed triggered flashbacks to her trauma. Others described distress, intimidation, and fear of disciplinary action merely for voicing concern.

To compound the outrage, the same man was reportedly chosen by NHS bosses to lead diversity and inclusion sessions for those who objected to sharing intimate spaces with him.

These nurses, now supported by the Christian Legal Centre, face not only an employment battle but possible misconduct probes by the Nursing and Midwifery Council after ideologically driven public complaints.

When “kindness” is used to enforce falsehood, and women are punished for defending truth and modesty, we see what the Apostle Paul called “the mystery of iniquity”.

2 Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

1 Corinthians 13:6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth.

Sign our petition against woke laws →

Trans Lavatory Ban ‘Risks Breaking ECHR Rules’

The clash between Westminster and Strasbourg has emerged over proposed UK guidance that would prevent men claiming to be women from using female lavatories and changing rooms.

Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner Michael O’Flaherty has written to MPs warning that such a move could breach the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). He claims that restricting access by “gender identity” rather than biological sex would infringe the right to privacy under Article 8, forcing trans-identified people to “out” themselves when accessing single-sex spaces.

In his letter, O’Flaherty—an Irish Catholic and long-time LGBT advocate—positioned himself as a moral authority over British law, implying that the UK must comply with Strasbourg’s interpretation of human rights.

His intervention follows the UK Supreme Court’s ruling earlier this year that “sex” in law means biological sex, not self-declared gender.

That landmark judgment paved the way for clearer guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) affirming that single-sex services and spaces may be reserved for women only.

O’Flaherty’s letter is another example of unelected European officials meddling in domestic affairs and promoting the ideology of gender self-identification under the guise of “human rights.” The move highlights just how deeply transgender ideology has penetrated European institutions, where “inclusion” often takes precedence over truth, privacy and safety.

It also raises serious questions about the democratic legitimacy of outside bodies attempting to override decisions made by Britain’s highest court.

Join or Support Christian Voice →

The BBC has become the latest battleground in the growing cultural war over gender ideology.

The corporation now allows staff to work from home if they are “uncomfortable with its trans-toilet policy”, which permits biological men to use women’s lavatories and changing areas.

Instead of protecting the privacy and safety of women, the media house is enabling a confused system where “feelings” trump biological fact.

The Supreme Court has already ruled that “sex” in the Equality Act refers to biological reality, yet the BBC refuses to act until the Government issues further guidance.

Genesis 1:27 God made man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

The Cost of Compromise

By allowing staff to work from home rather than fixing the root problem, the BBC sends a clear message: gender ideology outweighs common sense. Female employees, instead of being protected, are pushed out of the workplace to avoid discomfort and potential risk.

Taxpayers fund this publicly owned organisation, yet it now fosters division and alienation within its ranks. Britain once led the world in fairness and order; now even lavatories have become ideological battlegrounds.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.

Join or Support Christian Voice →

Workplaces Under Siege

The gender-neutral toilet agenda is creeping through offices, schools, hospitals, and corporations. Women who object risk accusations of “transphobia,” while managers hide behind “inclusion policies.”

Instead of uniting people, this ideology fractures trust and erodes respect. Workplaces once guided by professionalism now operate under fear of ideological reprimand.

The line between privacy and politics has been erased by policy-makers who value social experiments over employee welfare.

1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace..

Men’s Prisons told to Offer Trans Inmates Make-up

The exercise yard at the fictional 'Slade Prison'.
The exercise yard at the fictional ‘Slade Prison’.

As Britain celebrates its supposed progressiveness, the nation slides further into confusion. The latest absurdity? Men’s prisons have been told to provide make-up and beauty products for inmates who identify as women. Convicted criminals are now indulged with cosmetics in the name of “gender affirmation.” It would be comical if it were not tragic.

When the justice system panders to delusion, punishment loses its moral force. The same political class that ignores victims’ cries now caters to the vanity of offenders. Across the public sector, truth is treated as hate, and biological reality is treated as bigotry.

This is moral collapse on a continental scale. European bureaucrats, puffed up with self-importance, believe they have the authority to rewrite creation itself. And sadly, many churchmen echo them rather than oppose them.

The proud letters from one Irish Church of England bureaucrat lecturing MPs on “trans inclusion” only show how deep the rot has spread into the institutions once meant to uphold God’s Word.

Today, vileness is not only exalted, it is enshrined in policy.

Psalm 12:8 The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.

Genesis 1:27: Male and female created He them.

Only One Side of the Trans “Debate” Silences Free Speech

There are rare glimmers of courage amid the fog of fear. Actress Keira Knightley recently stood her ground against online “trans activists” after questioning the extremes of gender ideology in the entertainment world. Her defiance provoked fury from those who demand absolute conformity, yet she did not yield. In doing so, she proved that integrity still has a place in public life — even if it comes at personal cost.

Contrast that courage with the silence of so many in power. Politicians, broadcasters, and bishops alike have chosen the path of least resistance. They bow to activists, ignore women’s safety, and call cowardice “compassion.”

The cultural elite, once devoted to reason, now genuflect before feelings. The result is a society at war with itself, unable to define a woman, unwilling to defend a child, and unashamed of moral confusion.

Christians must not follow suit. We are not called to appease error but to proclaim truth.

John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free

Love or Deception?

A “transgender” woman (a man) who tricked another man into believing he was a woman has been found guilty of sexual assault.

The biological XY bloke, who now goes by the name Ciara Watkin, from Thornaby, met his victim on Snapchat and pretended to be female, even claiming to be “on her period” to hide his true identity.

His victim later discovered the truth and told police he would never have consented if he had known. The jury found Watkin guilty after a short trial at Teesside Crown Court, and he must now sign the sex offenders register.

This case shows how easily people can hide behind the LGBTQ slogan of “inclusion” to deceive others. Society has been taught to “believe everyone’s truth”, even when that truth is built on lies. In this case, “gender identity” became a tool of manipulation. The same culture that demands silence in the name of love and kindness allowed a man to commit a grave offence without question.

When truth is replaced by feelings, sin finds a hiding place. What was once shameful is now celebrated as “brave”. Watkin’s deceit is not a mistake; it is a warning. If society refuses to recognise God’s created order of male and female, confusion and exploitation will follow.

A Nation in Moral Confusion

Rebekah Chapman: Credit: https://x.com/sewingwithsteel
Rebekah Chapman: Credit: https://x.com/sewingwithsteel

From hospitals to prisons, from the arts to European bureaucracy, Britain is being forced to celebrate delusion and condemn truth. What began as “inclusion” has become coercion; what was once compassion has turned into tyranny of conscience.

Up in Scotland, a designer says she was ordered to leave a shop after complaining about a staff member’s “no terfs, no Tories” badge.

Rebekah Chapman, 33, said she was subjected to “intolerance and nasty slogans” after challenging the employee at Dundee’s Hobbycraft branch. She claimed the store’s manager sided with the staff member and told her to “read a biology textbook”. Hobbycraft have since apologised, but why did this happen in the first place?

We are in cultural darkness, yet the call remains:

Jeremiah 6:16 Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein

Truth on Trial

In modern Britain, stating that men and women are different can cost you your job or reputation. The ideology of gender fluidity demands silence or surrender.

Public bodies like the BBC and NHS risk replacing biological fact with political fiction. Yet truth is not hateful. It is liberating.

The Christian call is not to mock, but to stand firm and speak truth in love — even when powerful institutions oppose it.

Proverbs 23:23 Buy the truth, and sell it not.

A Call to Courage

Christians must pray, speak, and act while there is still time. Every concession to gender ideology undermines creation order and endangers the most vulnerable.

Protecting women’s spaces and affirming biological reality is not discrimination; it is obedience to God’s design.

The Church must be a light in this darkness, showing compassion for those confused by gender ideology while refusing to bow before it. Britain’s future depends on rediscovering the courage to say what is true.

Related stories

Who is defying the Supreme Court’s biological realities ? →

The promiscuous, predatory world of male homosexuality →

“Police should not march with pride” →

‘Homosexuality genetic’? Not again! →

Pussy Riot jailed & Moscow bans gay parades →

Ofcom: “Broadcasters must call men women” →

“Police should not march with pride” →

Read and pray

READ: Gen 1:27; Deut 30:19; Josh 7:10-11; 1Sam 2:30; Eccl 11:5; Prov 14:12;Matt 9:12; Mark 12:30-31; Ephesians 6:4; 1 Corinth 1:28-29

PRAY: Thank God for these Nurses who have spoken up courageously.
Pray that God should raise leaders who are not afraid to stand for the truth.
Pray for the NHS and other government institutions.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Vaccine mania drives continued lockdown

Professor Neil Ferguson
Professor Neil Ferguson

Professor Neil Ferguson models vaccines at Imperial College
Professor Neil Ferguson models vaccines at Imperial College

Yesterday, the UK Government continued its unjust and irrational shutdown of major sectors of the economy and, incidentally, of large areas of the NHS. They intensified Covid-19 Project Fear. Why does the UK persist with a policy which the rest of Europe is now abandoning?

Social distancing ‘indefinitely’

A comment from the false prophet whose biased modelling spooked the Government into starting the lockdown gives us a clue. According to the BBC, Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College said we should expect a “significant level” of social distancing “indefinitely”. It would continue until a vaccine for Covid-19 is rolling off the production line. And that could be later this year, or maybe not until 2021.

Dr Ferguson went on: “And I should say, it’s not going to be going back to normal. We will have to maintain some level of social distancing, a significant level of social distancing, probably indefinitely until we have a vaccine available.”

Health Minister Nadine Dorries (@NadineDorries) tweeted last night: ‘Journalists should stop asking about an ‘exit strategy.’ There is only one way we can ‘exit’ full lockdown and that is when we have a vaccine. Until then, we need to find ways we can adapt society and strike a balance between the health of the nation and our economy. #COVID19’

Incidentally, Nadine Dorries is supposed to hold the brief for mental health and suicide prevention. Only this morning says the BBC the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were warning how stressful the lockdown is on mental health.

Vaccines save lives

Now, before you dismiss this article as yet another anti-vaccine tirade, let me make my position clear. I have evidence that vaccines save lives. Years ago, we used to lose young lambs every year on the farm. Just as they were starting to put on weight from the spring grass, they would keel over and die. It was always the best ones, the biggest.

What was going on? What was killing them? When I shared the problem with a neighbouring sheep farmer, he told me it was most likely pasteurellosis pneumonia or a clostridial disease such as pulpy kidney picked up with the spring grass. And what was the answer? Heptavac, he said. As the name suggests, the solution contains seven vaccines in one dose.

That very day, I started a vaccination programme for the whole flock. Subsequently, we vaccinate all new lambs and give the ewes a booster just before lambing, which they pass on in colostrum to the lamb before the lambs receive their own dose of Heptavac. The result? No more dead lambs. Vaccination works. World-wide, the return is said to be $44 dollars of productivity for every $1 spent on vaccines as people stay alive for longer.

Ferguson is vaccine modeller

But compulsory vaccination is another matter entirely. We also need to remember vaccination, particularly on a large human scale, makes pharmaceutical companies a lot of money. The vaccine market is worth more than $35 billion today, according to AB Bernstein. Four big players account for about 85% of the market — British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline, French pharmaceutical company Sanofi, and U.S.-based Merck and Pfizer.

So is Professor Ferguson a mere dispassionate observer of human vaccines and vaccination programmes just like you and me?

Er, no. This webpage from Imperial College London reveals that Professor Ferguson sits atop Imperial’s ‘Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium’ or ‘VIMC’.

The VIMC looks at ‘the impact of vaccination programmes worldwide’. It’s data helps ‘inform potential future investments and vaccine scale-up opportunities’.

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Imperial College London - taken from a page on which they advertise their 'Master of Public Health (MPH) course.
Imperial College London – taken from a page on which they advertise their ‘Master of Public Health (MPH) course.

Now who is the world’s biggest vaccine enthusiast? Step forward Bill Gates, late of Microsoft, now putting all his energy into vaccination programmes.

So it comes as no surprise, as this breakdown shows, to find the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have given Imperial College $184,872,226.99 (yes, nearly $185m) from 2006 to 2018. Only Wellcome Trust has given Imperial College more down the years.

If we narrow the money trail down only to Imperial College’s VIMC, its ‘About us’ page reveals ‘The Consortium is funded by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the data generated by the Consortium will support the evaluation of the two organisations’ existing vaccination programmes, and inform potential future investments and vaccine scale-up opportunities.’ There are those ‘scale-up opportunities’ again.

Exod 23:8 And thou shalt take no gift: for the gift blindeth the wise, and perverteth the words of the righteous.

Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance

Now we have an appearance of ‘Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance’. GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation) apparently started up twenty years ago at the World Economic Forum with a $750m donation from Bill Gates. Bill and Melinda were looking at the time at projects in which to invest. The year 2000 Gavi donation started the Gates’ passion for vaccines. Today, Gavi claims to have vaccinated half the world’s children.

However, although Gavi boasts partners such as Unicef, the World Health Organisation (WHO), the World Bank, vaccine manufacturers (what a surprise) and donor country governments, its biggest contributor is now the UK Government, providing 23.44% of its income as against a mere 19.66% from Bill & Melinda.

This 2015 webpage from Gavi reveals their CEO, Dr Seth Berkley, seeking to ‘raise billions of dollars to ensure Gavi Is fully funded between 2016 and 2020’.

ID2020

Here is where it all becomes somewhat creepy. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, is a founding partner of ID2020. This body ‘supports digital identity programs’. It claims ‘The Need for Good Digital ID is Universal’. The ID2020 ‘digital identity’ webpage even tries to enrol human rights as it tries to expand digital ID. ‘The ability to prove who you are is a fundamental and universal human right’, it says. Meanwhile, its manifesto begins by stating ‘identity is a human right and that individuals must have “ownership” over their own identity.’

Dr Seth Berkley, CEO of GAVI, seen here addressing the Davos forum, sits on the board of ID2020
Dr Seth Berkley, CEO of GAVI, seen here addressing the Davos forum, also sits on the board of ID2020

Other ‘Founding Partners’ of ID2020 include Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation. Gavi’s Dr. Seth Berkley sits on the Executive Board of ID2020.

Why? It is because, as the Biometric Update website reveals, immunization can be ‘leveraged’ as ‘an opportunity to establish digital identity’. A pilot programme in Bangladesh ‘was unveiled by ID2020 in partnership with the Bangladesh Government’s Access to Information (a2i) Program, the Directorate General of Health Services, and Gavi.’

Biometric Update go on, helpfully, to explain: ‘Digital identity is a computerized record of who a person is, stored in a registry. It is used, in this case, to keep track of who has received vaccination.’ Gavi want ‘to use biometrics to improve vaccine coverage in developing nations.’

This is probably not the famous ‘chip’, although Haley Weiss in ‘The Atlantic’ reveals that technology is already being used. It is more likely, as this article in New Humanist suggests, a finger-print linked back to a database.

It is not just in developing nations that ID2020 biometrics will be useful to the authorities. In the city of Austin, Texas, we read how homeless people will be ’empowered’ with ‘their own’ identity data. How good is that?

Rapid Vac

In September 2017, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation together with the Wellcome Trust and the governments of Norway and India launched The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Pronounce it as ‘Seppy’.

The CEPI website, ‘New vaccines for a safer world’, says CEPI is ‘a global alliance financing and coordinating the development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases.’ It has headquarters in Oslo. Its website lists its ‘investers and partners’ who include the UK and the EU. Charlotte Watts, Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Department for International Development sits on the CEPI board as does Jeremy Farrar of Wellcome Trust and Peter Piot of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. LSH&TM also provides CEPI’s Scientific Advisory Committee with Dr John Edmunds and Dr Peter Smith.

Charlotte Watts, Jeremy Farrar and John Edmunds also sit on the UK Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) as does Neil Ferguson.  So don’t expect SAGE to come out strongly for ‘herd immunity’ as a preferred policy.

Professor Robin Shattock develops vaccines at Imperial College
Professor Robin Shattock develops vaccines at Imperial College

CEPI is, as you will already have guessed, awash with money. In December 2018 it gave $8.4m to Imperial College London as this IC webpage shows to develop a rapid vaccine against new unknown pathogens, ‘Disease X’. It says: ‘Through this partnership, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and Imperial aims to develop vaccines against new and unknown pathogens within 16 weeks from identification of antigen to product release for clinical trials.’ It is the latter stage which takes the time.

Professor Robin Shattock is the Head of Mucosal Infection and Immunity within the Department of Medicine at Imperial College London. He said ‘Vaccines are needed more than ever—essential to outbreak response, biosecurity, and the ever-present threat of a Disease X scenario.’ Professor Robin Shattock is a colleague of Professor Neil Ferguson. Professor Shattock develops the vaccines. Professor Ferguson models their impact. Both are funded by Gavi and Bill & Melinda Gates.

Bill Gates fears natural immunity

Bill Gates fears natural immunity
Bill Gates fears natural immunity

So why was Dr Neil Ferguson saying social distancing, for which read a version of lockdown, must stay until there is a vaccine? The answer lies in an interview Bill Gates gave on 24th March reported on the Off-Guardian website. In it:

‘Bill Gates outlined that, despite the comparatively small threat of Coronavirus, he and his colleagues “don’t want a lot of recovered people” who have acquired natural immunity. They instead are hoping we become reliant on vaccines and anti-viral medication.’

On the population developing their own immunity, Mr Gates said: ‘We don’t want to have a lot of recovered people […] To be clear, we’re trying – through the shut-down in the United States – to not get to one percent of the population infected.’

It is exactly the same approach as that of Neil Ferguson. Both want to ensure that as few of us as possible develop immunity, so as to maintain the market for the vaccine, when it eventually arrives.

Now we understand why Professor Ferguson had to produce a mathematical model, with the ludicrous half-a-million deaths, designed to scare the politicians away from Boris Johnson’s entirely sensible initial response, built on keeping calm, carrying on, isolating the vulnerable, taking health precautions and allowing ‘herd immunity’ to build up. It was nothing to do with public health. It was all about money. Nor did Professor Ferguson at any stage declare his conflict of interest. And make no mistake, this profile of a member of his Imperial College team confirms his Gavi funding and shows how deeply Neil Ferguson is embedded in the vaccine industry.

This may also account for the slow roll-out of antibody tests. If those show Covid-19 antibodies in half the population it really is game over for the vaccine.

Digital immunity proof

Off-Guardian says: ‘Shockingly, Gates also suggests people be made to have a digital ID showing their vaccination status, and that people without this “digital immunity proof” would not be allowed to travel. Such an approach would mean very big money for vaccine producers.’

So now the link to ID2020 and biometric data comes closer to home. Mr Gates said: ‘Eventually what we’ll have to have is certificates of who’s a recovered person, who’s a vaccinated person […] Because you don’t want people moving around the world where you’ll have some countries that won’t have it under control, sadly. You don’t want to completely block off the ability for people to go there and come back and move around. So eventually there will be this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global reopening up.’

Email your MP right now

Dr Neil Ferguson has been exposed already as a false prophet. Now we know what is driving him. And the Government have bought it hook, line and sinker.

Bear in mind also how the UK Government has shown from its funding programmes how wedded it is in any case to vaccine programmes.

EMAIL your MP from this Parliament link; you have to click on their name twice to reach their email address. Witness to your MP using the material here. Note we say people should take obvious health precautions, and those at risk can remain in isolation. But the general economy must now return to normal, if it is not already too late.

In particular, ask your MP to ask the Government to confirm Professor Neil Ferguson works for the vaccine industry, ask them why he has never disclosed that conflict of interest and demand getting us all back to work must not depend on some vaccine.

I said to my MP: ‘I am shocked by the comments from Nadine Dorries and Professor Neil Ferguson that your constituents have to wait for a vaccine against Covid-19 before we can all return to work.

‘That is an unreasonable and unjust demand. And may I ask you to ask the Government to what extent Professor Ferguson has disclosed his financial links to the vaccine industry?’

Amos 5:12 For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins: they afflict the just, they take a bribe, and they turn aside the poor in the gate from their right.

Read our previous articles:

A false sense of insecurity:

Lockdown to stay as Boris recovers:

Covid-19 deaths overtake GB abortions:

Fearfully and wonderfully made: How God has equipped you to fight Covid-19!

Protect the NHS

Lock-down ‘putting lives at risk’

Coronavirus: No fear of ‘the pestilence’

Covid-19: Fear on every side

We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings


Click on the social media

Elections: Why the people revolted

Nigel Farage celebrates huge gains for Reform
Nigel Farage celebrates huge gains for Reform

Nigel Farage celebrates huge gains for Reform
Nigel Farage celebrates huge gains for Reform

With virtually all the results in, it is clear the people have had enough of the Labour Party and are not too pleased with the Conservatives either. They are now looking to Reform for hope. These are the results to date, according to the BBC, with most counting now done:

England:
Reform: 1444 (up 1442 seats)
Labour: 997 (down 1406 seats)
Liberal Democrats: 834 (up 151 seats)
Conservatives: 773 (down 557 seats)
Greens: 515 (up 374 seats)
Independents: 199 (up 27 seats)
Other 36 (down 41 seats)

Scotland:
Scottish National Party 58 seats 6 seats lost
Labour 17 seats 4 seats lost
Reform UK 17 seats 17 seats gained
Scottish Green 15 seats 6 seats gained
Conservative 12 seats 19 seats lost
Liberal Democrat 10 seats 6 seats gained
Change since 2021. 65 seats needed for a majority.

Wales:
Plaid Cymru 43 seats 20 seats gained
Reform UK 34 seats 34 seats gained
Labour 9 seats 35 seats lost
Conservative 7 seats 22 seats lost
Green 2 seats 2 seats gained
Liberal Democrat 1 seat 1 seat gained
Change since 2021. 49 seats needed for a majority.

England

The people’s revolt in England was driven on the surface by the failure of successive governments to keep their promises to stop illegal immigration, by a crime wave, by Labour’s perplexing positions on gender, by the costs of energy, food and housing, by declines in living standards and by a general pessimism. This is the first generation for centuries where people do not expect to do as well as their parents did.

But under the surface, the spiritual reality is that immigration has been driven by rebellion against the Lord, by a deliberately elitist anti-Christian multiculturalism, exalting ‘the climate’ over prosperity, food and energy security, attacking God’s institution of the family, even his creation ordinance of ‘male and female’, making it harder to work for a living, which scripture says is the ’gift of God’, by overbearing, unscriptural levels of taxation and forgetting the divine function of the state is to maintain law and order and security.

As results were being announced, at least one senior UK Labour government figure was acknowledging a widespread public feeling of insecurity. Defence Secretary John Healey stating that, ‘You can’t feel hopeful if you don’t feel secure’. Having been let down by ‘the uniparty’, voters felt they had nothing left to lose.

Working-class revolt

Ordinary, working-class people are feeling the insecurity most. Writing in Spiked Online, Brendan O’Neill ventured:

“It’s a seismic realignment. It feels like an unspoken, unbloody revolt: the calm but firm defeat of two-party politics by working-class communities who feel that such a system no longer represents them. Who feel, in fact, that the knackered duopoly, whether as a result of its moral cowardice or its strangulation by bureaucracy, is incapable of pursuing the restoration of sovereign integrity and social wisdom that they are crying out for.

“Labour and its media sympathisers will comfort themselves today with talk of a ‘bloody nose’ from ‘voters who just want to be heard’, when in truth we could be witnessing as radical a transformation of the political landscape as the founding of the Labour Party itself was in 1900. We could be witnessing another reasoned intrusion of working-class voters into a political realm that they feel is too small, smug and insular to contain, far less enact, their political desires. …

“Such is the flux of our era that much might change again between now and the General Election. Yet no one can look at England this morning and deny that the masses have executed a coup against a complacent regime by choosing Reform as the new vessel of their moral hopes.”

Scotland

Anyone concerned about the stability of the United Kingdom will be pleased that the Scottish National Party (SNP) did not win outright in Scotland. However, they could form a government with the Scottish Greens, who are also in favour of independence and alignment with the EU.

The SNP flip-flopped on drilling in the North Sea to try to keep the North-East on side, but in general they are pro-Net Zero. They also join the Greens in their post-truth transgenderism.

Of course the last SNP-Green coalition ended in disaster in 2024. Then SNP first minister, Humza Yousaf, threw them out before being ejected himself. But we shall see. Either way, the biblical pattern for leadership, that leaders at every level should be:
Exo 18:21 … able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; …
Seems as long a way off in Scotland as anywhere else in the United Kingdom.

Wales

Plaid Cymru (PC: Party of Wales) are now the biggest party in the Senedd, despite propping up the previous Labour administration on everything from 20mph streets, pro-migrant ‘nation of sanctuary’, extreme sex education (when is sex education ever not extreme?), Net Zero and stopping farmers from growing food.

Around the lanes, it was a puzzle to see Plaid Cymru placards outside farms. Turkeys were voting for Christmas, ignoring PC’s pro-trans policies and their anti-farm dogma, in favour of the cosy thought that at least Plaid were very Welsh.

So it is a mercy that in Wales, the advocates of independence do not have the numbers even to take office with the Greens. Will Labour join a coalition with them after their resounding defeat? Who knows? The psalmist prayed for confusion amongst his enemies.

It is probably also a mercy for Reform that they did not win in Wales. The system would have been against them, obstructing their every move. They now have the opportunity to watch how it works and prepare to take control next time while harassing the Plaid Cymru establishment, pointing out the antagonism of the ‘Party of Wales’ to Welsh farmers, parents, security, society, enterprise and decency.

Foreign languages

We must pray against the rise of Islam under the Green Party banner in England. One Don Keith tweeted: ‘Green Party “victory” video shows zero English spoken. A room full of foreign languages celebrating their takeover of a British council. This is what replacement looks like in real time.’

On GB News a Green Party member, one John Grant, reacted to members of his party making an announcement in a foreign language during their campaign for London’s Newham: ‘I didn’t understand a word of what he said… it does make me a little uncomfortable I can’t deny’. He should be more than ‘uncomfortable’.

In majority-Muslim ghetto areas, sectarian campaigns were being conducted in Urdu or Bengali, focussing on ‘Palestine’ rather than potholes. Pretending Israel is conducting ‘genocide’ in Gaza took precedence over local, or even UK, issues.

The people need leaders of faith

If it is God who sets up kings, then the result is indeed a seismic shift from on high. But it remains that the people need leaders who can grasp the spiritual dimension and operate under the blessing of Jesus Christ, driven by the power of the Holy Spirit. They need to be, not just nominal Christians, but God-fearing men.

READ: Gen 1:27, Exod 18:21; Deut 6:3, 12:28; 1Chron 16:11; 2Sam 10:12; Psa 14:1, 35:4, 149:4-9; Eccl 3:13; Dan 2:21; Matt 20:15; John 15:5: Acts 17:7; Rom 13:3-6; 1Tim 6:15;

PRAY: For God to raise up God-fearing leaders after his own heart, for them to see that they can do nothing without Christ and to seek his face to lead and prosper the people.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Why Is the Civil Service Funding Over 500 Diversity Officers?

Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity (EDI) | Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity (EDI) | Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

As Britain faces mounting economic pressures, revelations now show that over 500 civil servants are employed across Government to police and expand Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) frameworks.These roles have doubled in some departments since Labour took power.

This surge, uncovered only after a two-year struggle for transparency by MP Neil O’Brien, raises sobering questions about national priorities. Rather than strengthening families, communities or national cohesion, resources appear to be funnelled into ideological administration.

It also follows earlier controversies, such as the 2022 revelation that Whitehall spent over £200,000 on unconscious-bias training shortly before scrapping it for being ineffective, and the 2021 backlash over civil service “gender-neutral language” directives that even ministers claimed were unnecessary distractions. What a waste of taxpayers money!

Year after year, the same pattern emerges, the machinery of Government grows increasingly devoted to cultural doctrines rather than practical reforms.

Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

Join or Support Christian Voice →

The Rising Cost Of Ideology

The Ministry of Defence alone now employs 77 DEI-themed staff, while the Cabinet Office’s “Office for Equality and Opportunity” has risen from 28 to 180 employees in just one year.

Across Whitehall, verified numbers reach at least 510 DEI posts, amounting to a minimum annual salary cost of £28.1 million, not counting compliance work placed upon other civil servants.

At a time when families struggle to heat their homes, ministers are expanding offices that generate more paperwork than practical benefit.

This echoes earlier concerns raised during the pandemic, when frontline workers complained that resources were being spent on administrative restructuring rather than essential service delivery.

The growing divide between institutional priorities and public realities has become increasingly difficult to ignore.

Matthew 6:21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

Stop transgenderism now! →

Opposition Forced To Dig For Truth

Conservative Party politician who has been the Member of Parliament for Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Neil O’Brien, Conservative Party politician who has been the Member of Parliament for Harborough, Oadby and Wigston

Neil O’Brien’s effort to uncover these figures met repeated obstruction, with some departments refusing to answer questions they had answered under the previous Government.

The Ministry of Justice and DEFRA claimed the information was “not held centrally”, a justification that even parliamentary advisors reportedly viewed as highly implausible.

This lack of transparency fuels public mistrust and raises concerns about what else lies hidden behind bureaucratic walls.

It mirrors past battles—such as the long-delayed release of data on police diversity spending in 2020, or the attempt to withhold internal guidance on school gender policies in 2021. The pattern is clear: when ideology takes root, openness often withers.

John 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light… lest his deeds should be reproved.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Taxpayers Made To Shoulder The Burden

Chancellor Rachel Reeves prepares to raise taxes again, claiming necessity. Yet within Government itself, DEI staffing expands relentlessly.

This creates double taxation: once for salaries, and again for the administrative burden DEI policy imposes on ordinary workers.

Mr. O’Brien warns that these “woke diversity jobs” operate as ideological engines rather than public service roles, driving up national costs while doing little to support the struggling British household.

This financial strain reflects earlier periods—such as the post-2008 austerity era—when ordinary families bore the brunt of government mismanagement. Today, many feel history is repeating itself, only now under the banner of equality rhetoric.

Proverbs 27:23 Be thou diligent to know the state of thy flocks, and look well to thy herds.

The Moral Responsibility Of Government

A government source defended the DEI expansion, citing policies addressing women’s safety, disability inclusion and workplace inequality.

Yet the broader concern remains: is the nation investing in genuine support or ideological machinery?

Britain’s working families, already burdened by rising costs, deserve a government focused on strengthening the moral, economic and spiritual foundations of society—not multiplying administrative structures whose outcomes remain unclear.

Past warnings from church leaders, community advocates and even former civil servants—have repeatedly stressed that a nation drifts when its institutions become detached from the real needs of its people.

As historic crises have shown, from the industrial decline of the 1980s to the family breakdown concerns highlighted by the 2011 riots review, a society that sacrifices foundational truths in pursuit of passing ideologies soon finds itself weakened.

Psalm 11:3 If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?

Related Articles

Labour’s Winter Fuel Raid Costs Taxpayers £400m →

Who Are The Trans Activists Influencing British Schools, Sports and the NHS? →

Tory Leadership: Do any of the candidates do God? →

Read and pray

READ: Joshua 24:15; 2 Chron 7:14; Isa 1:26; Psalm 11:3; Prov 11:14; Prov 14:34; James 1:5.

PRAY: Pray for national repentance and restoration
Pray gainst wasteful stewardship and misuse of public funds
Pray for wisdom for leaders and policymakers

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Western Money funds immoral Kenyan NGOs

Slide 14: So UK Public authorities now have a duty to promote homosexuality and transsexualism.
Slide 14: So UK Public authorities now have a duty to promote homosexuality and transsexualism.

This is the 48-slide PowerPoint presentation Stephen was able to give to Kenya Christian Professionals, clergy, activists and dignitaries on 13th November in Nairobi.

Slide 48: Christian Voice UK:  Praying for National Repentance, Working for Godly Government
Slide 1: Christian Voice UK: Praying for National Repentance, Working for Godly Government.

Slide 2: What we do:
(1) We research and analyse events against scripture.
(2) Our members pray for and witness to MP’s and those in public life.
(3) We go on the streets leafleting with Evangelistic Prophetic Witness, such as when London Zoo held ‘Gay Sunday,’ a party for homosexuals, or as we did in Nairobi at the UNFPA Summit.

Slide 3: Marie Stopes abortion ‘clinic' in south London – we kill 544 unborn children, legally, every day in GB. In America, they murder 3,700 each day.
Slide 3: Marie Stopes abortion ‘clinic’ in south London – we kill 544 unborn children, legally, every day in GB. In America, they murder 3,700 each day.

Marie Stopes abortion clinics operate openly all over Kenya.
Slide 4: Marie Stopes Kenya – Clinic in Malindi. MSK stays open in Kenya by pretending they only offer contraception and post-abortion care.
Marie Stopes abortion clinics operate openly all over Kenya.

Slide 5: However, a young British doctor, Linden Stocker, wrote this on the website of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in 2011: ‘Whilst I was in Kenya I managed to organise spending 2 days a week at the Marie Stopes clinic in Kisumu. … They perform safe, completely illegal abortions for a cost equivalent of about £30.’ The cost in Kenya of a Marie Stopes abortion has since risen to around 10,000 Kenya Shillings.

Slide 6: Marie Stopes Kenya have over 20 clinics, from Kitale to Nairobi to Mombasa. MSK is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marie Stopes International, the world’s second biggest abortionist after IPPF.
Moreover, KSh 10,000 is a fraction of the true cost of an MSK abortion. Marie Stopes abortions in Africa are heavily subsidised by the West. The UK Government leads the rest with a grant to MSI in 2018 of £48 million of taxpayers’ money. (NB: The Church in Kenya could close Marie Stopes by constant prayer vigils outside its facilities.)

Slide 7: Unborn baby at just 8 weeks
Slide 7: Unborn baby at just 8 weeks

Slide 8: Effects of suction abortion on African-American babies of (from top left) 7, 9, 10 and 11 weeks.
Slide 8: Effects of suction abortion on African-American babies of (from top left) 7, 9, 10 and 11 weeks.

Slide 9: The Bible says:
Num 35:33 So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it.
Psa 106:37 Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, 38 And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood.
Jer 32:35 And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.

Slide 10: Homosexuality was legalised in the UK in 1967.  Today, 100,000 homosexuals parade through London.
Slide 10: Homosexuality was legalised in the UK in 1967. Today, 100,000 homosexuals parade through London.

Slide 11: Jesus said: Mark 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. 7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; 8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.

Slide 12: Legalising homosexuality soon leads to Gvt promoting it.
United Kingdom’s Equality Act 2010: Section 148 Public sector equality duty
(1) A public authority must, in the exercise of its functions, have due regard to the need to-
(a) eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other conduct that is prohibited by or under this Act;
(b) advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it;
(c) foster good relations between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it.
(4) Having due regard to the need to foster good relations between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it involves having due regard, in particular, to the need to- (a) tackle prejudice, and (b) promote understanding.

Slide 13: (6) The relevant protected characteristics are: age; disability; gender reassignment; pregnancy and maternity; race; religion or belief; sex; sexual orientation.

Slide 14: So UK Public authorities now have a duty to promote homosexuality and transsexualism.
Slide 14: So UK Public authorities now have a duty to promote homosexuality and transsexualism.

Slide 15: Public authorities include Ministers of the Crown, Government Departments (except MI5, MI6 and GCHQ), The Armed Forces, National Health Service, County Councils, Police, Schools, Colleges and Universities.

Slide 16: Homosexual Police leading the London Gay Pride Parade.
Slide 16: Homosexual Police leading the London Gay Pride Parade.

Slide 17: The police officer here in the front row of the Brighton Gay Pride Parade is the Chief Constable of Sussex.  Note the homosexual desecration of the Union Jack.
Slide 17: The police officer here in the front row of the Brighton Gay Pride Parade is the Chief Constable of Sussex. Note the homosexual desecration of the Union Jack.

Slide 18: 5-year-old children are being subjected to homosexual propaganda at schools in England under the guise of ‘Relationships Education' and transgenderism is being promoted.  It's very similar to the Comprehensive Sexuality Education demanded by UNFPA across Africa
Slide 18: 5-year-old children are being subjected to homosexual propaganda at schools in England under the guise of ‘Relationships Education’ and transgenderism is being promoted. It’s very similar to the Comprehensive Sexuality Education demanded by UNFPA across Africa.

Slide 19: So, the UK then exports those evils. What David Cameron told homosexual activists at a party he gave for them in No 10 Downing Street on 22nd June 2011: ‘… an area where we have the ability to make progress, is the fact that gay people can be appallingly treated in other parts of the world, particularly in Africa.’

Slide 20: ‘(Foreign Aid) also has a spin-off benefit of giving us some moral authority (sic) in the world to talk to other leaders and governments about our relationship with them and what we expect from them. I’m very proud of the fact we [put] huge pressure on the leader of Malawi about an issue in that country but I‘m convinced we can do more. We have got the ability to speak to African leaders, African governments, about this issue that I know concerns everyone here tonight. And it concerns me.’ (David Cameron, UK Prime Minister)

Slide 21: Even before Mr Cameron’s speech, the Department for International Development had been promoting feminism and immorality in Africa:
Social Marketing of Condoms [103545] To increase adoption of safer sexual practices among youth. Country: Kenya Budget: £15,031,330 Start Date: 01/01/2003

Slide 22: Young Voices for Change (SRH Rights and HIV/AIDS) CSCF345 [105559] Young Tanzanians (10-24) know, promote and enact their sexual and reproductive rights, including with regards to HIV/ AIDS. Budget: £499,934 Start Date: 01/04/2005

Slide 23: Western money is promoting wickedness across Africa: Not one African NGO promoting Sexual & Reproductive Health & Rights (that’s abortion, LGBT and feminism) is African-funded. Every single one has its staff and expenses paid by the West. So let’s follow the money …

Slide 24: Rich US homosexual Jon Stryker set up the ‘Arcus Foundation’ to advance gay rights world-wide. He admitted the money going to Africa to promote sodomy was around $12,000,000 / year from NGO’s alone in 2010. How much is flooding in today?

Slide 25: 2015-16, top ten funders of money to Sub-Saharan Africa for LGBT (Source: ‘Global Resources Report):
1 Government of Sweden $14,454,266
2 Open Society Foundations (Soros) $4,097,626
3 Hivos (Netherlands) $3,218,406
4 American Jewish World Service $3,084,250
5 Arcus Foundation (USA) $2,716,639
6 Government of Norway $2,537,539
7 UHAI-EASHRI (Kenya) $2,323,769
8 Government of Denmark $2,166,635
9 Ford Foundation (USA) $2,144,550
10 Global Equality Fund (USA) $2,033,860
Total for just the top ten: $38,777,540

Slide 26: 2015-16, top recipients of money for LGBT (Source: ‘Global Resources Report) include:
3 Dept for Int Dev (RSA) $5,424,750
9 IPPF (London) $3,641,407
10 UHAI-EASHRI (Kenya) $3,497,086

Slide 27: Note above, Nairobi-based UHAI-EASHRI was listed as a donor of $2,323,769 in 2015/16 but a recipient of $3,497,086. A cool $1.1m went on their ‘6-25′ staff and office expenses.
UHAI EASHRI, established by Ford Foundation in 2009, claims to be ‘Africa’s first indigenous activist fund for sex workers and sexual and gender minorities’. But it is entirely funded by the West, not just by Ford Foundation (US), but Sigrid Rausing Trust & Baring Fdn ( both UK), Astrea Lesbian Fdn, Tides Fdn, Arcus Fdn, Urgent Action Fund, Atlantic Philanthropies, Fdn for a Just Society (all US) and others. (‘UHAI’ is an acronym but also means ‘life’ in Swahili.)

Slide 28: In an article on Saturday 23rd November 2019, the Nation newspaper revealed ‘Kenya’s best and worst paying jobs’ It said: ‘foreign-backed NGOs employed a total of 1,345 staff and 270 of them earned more than Sh100,000 monthly, making the agencies a magnet for those seeking or wanting to change jobs.’ Nowhere is that more true than in Kenya’s immoral NGOs.

Slide 29: In January 2011, The European Union gave a 300,000 Euro grant to promote gay rights in Cameroon to a group of pro-gay CSO’s led by the ‘Association to Defend Homosexuals‘.
Cameroon’s Foreign Minister Henri Eyebe Ayissi summoned the head of the EU delegation in Cameroon to protest against the funding of groups that “violate the laws of Cameroon.” But the grant still went ahead.

Slide 30: Funding for Kenyan LGBT groups includes:
Given to: National Gay & Lesbian Human Rights Commission (NG&LHRC): (Yes, there is such a group!) By: Sigrid Rausing Trust (UK): £180,000 over three years (2016-19).

Slide 31: The accounts of NG&LHRC show its total income in 2016 was Ksh 15,976,147

Slide 32: Here's the NG&LHRC logo, desecrating the Kenyan flag.
Slide 32: Here’s the NG&LHRC logo, desecrating the Kenyan flag.

Slide 33: There is also a ‘Gay & Lesbian Coalition of Kenya’ (G&LCK) which received $100,000 from Arcus Foundation in 2019. It also received funding from Open Society Foundations, Astrea, Hivos, UHAI, Coalition of African Lesbians, Kenya National Commission for Human Rights, Kenya Human Rights Commission, Kelin Kenya, National Coalition of Human Rights Defenders (Kenya), and the International Commission of Jurists, Kenya Section.

Slide 33: Kenya Human Rights Commission: From Sigrid Rausing Trust (UK):£100,000 in 2019. Also, ‘The KHRC relies on donations from individuals and from organisations such as:’ the Swedish Int. Dev. Agency, Christian Aid, Trocaire, Danish Int. Dev. Agency, UN Dev. Programme, UNIFEM, Canadian Int. Dev. Agency and Ford Fdn.
It started as a genuine human rights group, but in May 2011 the KHRC issued a report which called on the government to decriminalise homosexuality. That’s when the funds started rolling in.

Slide 34: Since 2012, the Kenyan Human Rights Commission has been primarily funded by the Ford Foundation of the USA at $200,000 per year. The KHRC even wanted to bring in a Hate Crimes Law in Kenya to prevent pastors preaching against homosexuality.
Chairman: Prof. Makau Mutua
Executive Director: George Kegoro

Slide 35: George Kigoro in full flow.
Slide 35: George Kigoro in full flow.

Slide 36: Prof Matua was in Kampala in 2010 in February at a conference – again funded by the Ford Foundation – to oppose David Bahati’s Bill against promotion of LGBT. The Ford Foundation is just one of around twenty NGO’s giving money to Ugandan gay groups. But let’s get back to Arcus Foundation …

Slide 37: In 2018, Arcus gave ‘more than $15 million’ ‘to organizations working to advance social justice for LGBT people around the world.’ Recent funding from Arcus Foundation alone to LGBT-advancing groups in Kenya:
2019: Gay and Lesbian Coalition of Kenya $100,000
2019: Persons Marginalised & Aggrieved (PEMA – Mombasa) $140,000
2019: Transgender Education and Advocacy: $100,000
2014-2018: Pembizo Christian Council $391,000 (to ‘create counter-narrative to condemning religious voices’)
2011-2018: UHAI EASHRI $1,720,000: (‘funding for LGBT biannual conference in Africa. For Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda.’)

Slide 38: 2016: Network of African National Human Rights Institutions (NANHRI) Nairobi $200,000 (‘Support to the African regional platform of government-appointed human-rights institutions seeking to include LGBT rights as human rights, with a pilot project in Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, and Uganda.’)
2013-2016: Other Sheep Africa $140,000 (‘to increase LGBTIQ acceptance within the Muslim community in 12 provinces of Kenya.’)
2016: The East African Documentary Film Fund $20,000
2014: Chemchemi Ya Ukweli (‘Fountain of Truth’!) $50,000
(Together for Transformation project, pilot LGBT training program for Muslim & Christian religious leaders.)

Slide 39: 2010 – 2012: Fahamu (Nairobi) $458,066 (‘Strengthen and expand African LGBT movement … partnerships, … with African governments and private multi-national and other corporations in collaboration with UHAI-EASRHI.)
2010: Akiba Uhaki Foundation $200,000 (‘support of the programmatic and convening activities of UHAI-EASRHI Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, and Burundi.’) (‘Akiba Uhaki’ sort of means ‘supply justice’.)
Plus South Africa LGBT projects in: Western Cape Provincial Council of Churches, Inclusive & Affirming Ministries, Southern African Christian Initiative.

Slide 40: Western politicians want Africa to end up with gay parades like this.
Slide 40: Western politicians want Africa to end up with gay parades like this.

Slide 41: Immoral NGOs operate openly in Kenya:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America: Chaka Place, 1st Floor, Chaka Rd, Nairobi
International Planned Parenthood Federation: Senteu Plaza, 3rd floor Lenana/Galana Rd Junction, Naiobi. (Planned Parenthood Global is advertising in The Nairobi Star newspaper for a youth worker right NOW – Nov 2019.)

Slide 42: Open Society initiative for East Africa: ACS Plaza, Lenana Road, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenya National Commission on Human Rights: Ist Floor,CVS Plaza,Lenana Road, Nairobi
UHAI-EASHRI: 3rd Floor, Suite 5, Rosami Court, Muringa Rd., Kilimani, Nairobi.

Slide 43: Kenya Human Rights Commission: Gitanga Road opp. Valley Arcade Shopping Center, Nairobi.
National Lesbian & Gay Human Rights Commission: Mpulla House # 4 Arboretum Drive (off State House Road), Nairobi.

Slide 44: Urgent Action Fund Africa: 2nd Floor, Riara Corporate Suites, Riara Road, Kilimani, Nairobi.
Fahamu Africa – Head Office: Block C, 3rd Floor, Peponi Plaza, Westlands, Nairobi, Kenya.

Slide 45: To stop evil coming from the West, we recommend:
(1) African, Asian and Caribbean members unite at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting, the next is in Kigali, Rwanda in June 2020, and put down resolutions defending life and family.
(2) Forums like the African Union and the Caribbean Union should state their rejection of immorality and foreign aid intended to corrupt public morality.
(3) Make it clear at diplomatic levels that aid donors must respect traditional family values.
(4) Bring in local laws to prevent promotion of evil.

46 Local laws need to be passed to prevent money intended to promote sodomy and abortion in Africa from reaching its targets. We suggest:
(1) Make it illegal to corrupt public morality – in particular to promote LGBT or abortion.
(2) Proscribe the foreign NGO’s involved and deny their representatives visas,
(3) Require local recipient organisations to open their accounts to discover their income,
(4) Seize foreign monies promoting immorality.

Slide 48: Christian Voice UK:  Praying for National Repentance, Working for Godly Government
Slide 48: Christian Voice UK: Praying for National Repentance, Working for Godly Government.

Slide 47: Christian Voice is glad to address governments, civil servants, members of parliament across Africa, Asia and the Caribbean on this issue and provide information to resist immorality.
More research needs to be done to identify all the governments, ngos, cso’s, projects and amounts involved.
And, lastly, thank God Africa is starting to move, as they say in Ghana: Beyond Aid

We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Stonewall’s Funds Dwindle Amid Backlash Over ‘Trans’ Activism

Stonewall is facing a serious financial crisis after years of aggressive activism and ideological campaigning.

Newly published accounts show the group recorded a deficit of almost £1 million in the last financial year, as income collapsed and spending continued to outstrip resources.

Its total reserves fell to just £91,811 by March 2025, down from nearly £1 million a year earlier. The figures show that Stonewall’s income dropped sharply from £6.9 million in 2024 to £4.7 million, while expenditure remained high at £5.6 million.

Much of the shortfall came as public bodies and major corporations withdrew funding or declined to renew contracts, particularly those linked to Stonewall’s ‘workplace diversity schemes’.

Fees from these programmes fell by more than £600,000 in a single year, reflecting growing institutional reluctance to be associated with the group’s agenda.

Stop transgenderism now! →

Political lobbying disguised as charity work

Pro-Transgender ‘Pride Flag’ painted on a walkway at NHS Princess Royal Hospital, Orpington, England.

Despite presenting itself as a ‘charity’, Stonewall continues to operate as a political pressure group, lobbying government departments, regulators, the NHS, and police forces to adopt contested policies on sex and gender.

In recent years, its focus shifted decisively toward ‘trans activism’, including the promotion of ‘self-identification’ policies, ‘gender-neutral language’, and the removal of sex-based distinctions in public services.

Stonewall’s influence extended into schools, prisons, women’s refuges, healthcare settings, and policing, often with little democratic oversight. It interventions undermined safeguarding, parental rights, freedom of belief, and sex-based protections, particularly for women and children. These concerns were frequently dismissed by the organisation as bigotry rather than addressed substantively.

As opposition grew, including from parents, clinicians, teachers, feminists, and faith groups, Stonewall’s once-unquestioned authority began to erode. The financial consequences now visible in its accounts suggest that the public have seen Stonewall for what it truly is.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.

Join or Support Christian Voice →

Controversies, legal risks, and public backlash

Stonewall’s decline coincides with a broader reckoning over the consequences of policies it helped normalise. Legal cases challenging sex-based rights, safeguarding failures in schools, and NHS treatments for children with ‘gender dysphoria’ have intensified scrutiny of the ideological framework Stonewall promoted. Institutions that once relied on Stonewall guidance have found themselves exposed to litigation, regulatory intervention, and public criticism.

Several high-profile organisations, including government departments and broadcasters have formally cut ties with Stonewall, citing concerns over neutrality and legal compliance. These departures were not symbolic; they represented a rejection of Stonewall’s assertion that its positions reflected settled law or public consensus.

For us at Christian Voice, the financial crisis is not accidental but the result of sustained overreach. But also, in a sense, Stonewall have won. The establishment, the quangocracy, now engage in trans activism, even trying to act as if the Supreme Court ruling last April, stating that sex is biological, never took place.

Numbers 32:23 Be sure your sin will find you out.

What this moment reveals

Stonewall’s financial predicament highlights the risks of allowing unelected lobby groups to shape public policy without accountability or restraint.

For taxpayers, the episode raises serious questions about how public money is allocated and whether ideological enforcement should ever have been funded in the first place. For Christians and others concerned with truth, order, and justice, the situation underscores the consequences of abandoning moral clarity in favour of political fashion.

As Stonewall’s resources dwindle, the wider lesson remains: movements built on coercion, ideological conformity, and the silencing of dissent rarely endure. But ‘trans’ ideology is taking a long while to die.

“Why trans is a mental-health issue”

For years, clinicians were trained to approach gender-related distress through careful psychological assessment, recognising it as a serious form of human suffering requiring evidence-based care. That professional framework has steadily collapsed.

As practising psychotherapist Stella O’Malley recently wrote on Spiked Online, “what was once clearly understood as a mental-health issue has been rebranded as a matter of personal identity, beyond clinical questioning or therapeutic challenge. This shift has left families and vulnerable individuals without clear guidance at the very moment clarity is most needed.”

Medical leadership has played a central role in this retreat. Rather than defending rigorous diagnosis and long-term risk assessment, professional bodies increasingly adopted euphemistic language, avoiding words such as “disorder” or “distress” in favour of affirming narratives. In doing so, they effectively abandoned their duty to weigh harm, risk, and irreversible outcomes. The result has been confusion, not compassion, and a clinical culture reluctant to speak honestly about long-term consequences.

“The move away from a mental-health framework was not accidental. In 2010, international organisations such as WPATH deliberately promoted “de-psychopathologisation”, reframing gender distress as a neutral human variation rather than a condition requiring psychiatric care. Governments and health services were encouraged to follow suit. What began as an attempt to reduce stigma evolved into a wholesale rejection of mental-health language altogether,” She added.

This redefinition has had serious consequences. By removing clinical caution, medical interventions with permanent effects were recast as routine and celebratory. Risks such as infertility, sexual dysfunction, bone density loss and chronic pain were marginalised.

Suspect attack JD Vance home transgender Democrat donor

US Vice-President J D Vance tells Europe's self-satisfied elite some home truths.
US Vice-President J D Vance tells Europe’s self-satisfied elite some home truths.

The collapse of clinical restraint has not occurred in a vacuum. Cultural narratives that frame identity as absolute and unquestionable increasingly spill into public life, sometimes with disturbing consequences.

This was evident in the recent attack on the home of US Vice President JD Vance, allegedly carried out by a transgender-identifying individual now facing multiple criminal charges. The incident was not merely an act of vandalism, but an escalation that raised serious questions about radicalisation and grievance politics.

The accused individual was not marginalised in the conventional sense. Reports indicate a background of considerable wealth, elite education, and political connections. This challenges the commonly repeated claim that extreme behaviour in such cases is driven solely by social exclusion or poverty. Instead, it raises the uncomfortable possibility that ideological certainty, when reinforced by institutional affirmation, can contribute to volatility rather than stability.

Public trust erodes further when political, media and institutional leaders appear unwilling to confront this complexity. By refusing to acknowledge the role of ideology in shaping behaviour, they leave society ill-equipped to respond when belief hardens into action.

English courts defy own ruling on trans toilets

Campaign group calls courts’ inaction absurd as single-sex provision remains unenforced
Campaign group calls courts’ inaction absurd as single-sex provision remains unenforced

Nowhere is institutional confusion more evident than in the response of English courts to their own legal rulings.

Despite a landmark Supreme Court judgment clarifying that “sex” in the Equality Act refers to biological sex, court authorities have continued to allow biological males into women’s toilets. This refusal to implement settled law has alarmed campaigners and undermined confidence in the justice system’s impartiality.

The courts’ explanation that they are awaiting further guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission has only deepened concern. The EHRC itself has stated that public bodies are expected to follow the law as it stands, not delay compliance indefinitely. That the courts, of all institutions, appear to be defying legal clarity has been described as both absurd and dangerous.

Women’s rights advocates warn that this reluctance to act places women at risk, particularly in enclosed and vulnerable spaces. The issue is not abstract. It concerns safety, dignity, and the principle that legal rulings should be applied consistently, not selectively. When law is treated as optional, public confidence fractures.

This episode reflects a broader failure of leadership. Ideological pressure has overridden legal duty, leaving taxpayers to fund institutions that refuse to uphold their own rules.

Related Story

GCHQ abandons Stonewall →

Royal College of Psychiatrists cut ties with Stonewall →

Schools defy ministers: children ‘change gender’ without parental knowledge →

Mother banned from seeing sex-ed materials →

Costa promotes mutilation as Government
delays schools “transgender” guidance →

NHS bans puberty blockers for children →

UK in disarray over “puberty blockers” →

Who Are The Trans Activists Influencing British Schools, Sports and the NHS? →

Read and pray

READ: Isa 5:20; Prov 31:8–9; Matt 6:24; Rom 1:18-32, Gala 6:7; Jhn 1:5.

PRAY: Thank God for opening the eyes of organisations who have chosen to withdraw funding.
Pray that God will continue to expose lobby groups disguised as charity.
Pray for the protection of children and the restoration of moral boundaries.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

 

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Judicial corruption: Two-Tier Justice

Judicial Corruption: A Moral, Social, and Political Rot - Republic Policy

Judicial Corruption: A Moral, Social, and Political Rot – Republic Policy

Judicial corruption and inconsistent sentencing are under scrutiny in the UK.

It is becoming apparent that the British legal system is serving its own interests and those of the state rather than delivering justice for the public, as the biblical standard demands.

In the Bible, justice is about putting things right, but recent cases suggest that British courts are more focused on defending their own patch rather than protecting the rights and safety of citizens.

Turning a blind a eye

A glaring example of of the two-tier system disparity is seen in the way certain crimes, such as burglary and shoplifting, are handled. Despite the emotional and financial toll these offences take on victims, the government make reassuring noises but the police stand accused of turning a blind eye to them.

Policies have emerged suggesting that unless the value of what’s stolen is deemed significant, pursuing these cases is considered a waste of police time.  The police are also reluctant to chase after perpetrators who could be dangerous.

This approach has left many feeling vulnerable. Criminals face minimal consequences, and communities are left without the assurance that justice will be served.

The leniency in these cases stands in contrast to harsher sentences handed down for less direct threats to public safety.

Sentences for ‘rioters’

Following the murders of three little girls in Southport on 29th July 2024, demonstrations took place across England in the following month. It would appear that stories circulated on social media claiming the suspect was an illegal migrant. He wasn’t. He was of Rwandan descent and was born in Cardiff.

Some of the protests turned violent, with items thrown at the police. However, during one incident in Whitehall, it appears that angry protestors merely confronted the police with shoving and verbal abuse.

The case of one of them, David Spring, 61, of Sutton in South London, stands out. Mr Spring’s role in the disorder was shown on police body worn camera footage in court. He was seen making threatening and hostile gestures towards police, calling officers “c****” and joining in chants of “you’re not English anymore” and “who the f*** is Allah”.

The local paper reported that Judge Kelleher said a custodial sentence was appropriate ‘in order to deter others from engaging in similar behaviour’. David Spring was advised by barrister Piers Kiss-Wilson to plead guilty to violent disorder. He was sentenced to 18 months.

There was no report that we have seen associating Mr Spring with actual violence. In essence, he received 18 months for calling policemen part of the female anatomy, questioning  their patriotism and asking, in robust language, what jurisdiction has the god of the Muslims over this United Kingdom.

State protecting its dignity

Burglaries, shoplifting, knife crime, affect ordinary people. What the August protestors did was challenge the immigration policy of the State. So it appears we now have a legal system more interested in maintaining its own standing with expedited procedural efficiency than in administering justice for the people.

This inconsistency raises questions about the integrity of the judicial system and whether it is meeting its fundamental biblical role: to right wrongs and protect the public. Without a commitment to equitable justice, the trust in our institutions of law and order will continue to erode. Two-tier policing, two-tier justice and two-tier politics are stoking up resentment. The system is no longer serving those it is meant to protect.

The Bible says,
Leviticus 19:15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.

Support Christian Voice →

The rise of shoplifting

The number of shoplifting offences recorded by police in England and Wales has risen to a new 20-year high. A total of 443,995 offences were logged by forces in the year to March 2024, up 30% on the 342,428 recorded in the previous 12 months.

The figure is the highest since current records began in the year to March 2003, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Meanwhile, one of the UK’s largest grocery chains has told a parliamentary inquiry that organised criminals are behind the recent rise in shoplifting and violence against shop workers rather than people stealing to survive,

Paul Gerrard, the public affairs director at the Co-op, told the House of Lords justice and home affairs committee into shoplifting that a 44% rise in retail crime it experienced last year was mostly down to gangs stealing to order at scale – clearing shelves in some cases.

The Bible says,
Job 11:14 If iniquity be in thine hand, put it far away, and let not wickedness dwell in thy tabernacles.

Uphold Christian freedom
and repeal ‘woke’ laws →

Huw Edwards

Former BBC presenter Huw Edwards facing charges of making indecent pictures of children – NewscastStudio

The case of Huw Edwards, coming at this time, also appeared to illustrate inconsistencies in the UK’s justice system.

Mr. Edwards, a former BBC presenter, was convicted of possessing 41 indecent images, including the most serious category, yet he received a suspended sentence, allowing him to avoid prison.

Nevertheless, legal commentators pointed to mitigating factors like his mental health and early guilty plea as well as the exact circumstances and the legal definitions  as reasons for the apparent lenient outcome. It is worth reading the judge’s sentencing remarks (and the discussion between John and Stephen in the comments below).

However, it remains that others have received much harsher penalties for far less serious offences. For example, Julie Sweeney from Cheshire was sentenced to 15 months in prison for making an offensive online comment.

This disparity again raises important questions about the justice system’s priorities, where serious offenses, and not just that of Mr Edwards, are met with leniency, while lesser actions lead to significant punishment.

The Bible says,
Zephaniah 3:5 The just Lord is in the midst thereof; he will not do iniquity: every morning doth he bring his judgment to light, he faileth not; but the unjust knoweth no shame.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Domestic abusers released from prison

Alex Chalk, former Justice Secretary.

Violent domestic abusers were among the offenders released from prison in Augusr  after serving just forty per cent of their sentences, in a bid to free up prison spaces for protestors.

In an interview with LBC, former Justice Secretary, Alex Chalk  accused ministers of not being ‘frank with the British people’ about what releasing people early from prison would mean.

Mr. Chalk stated that a man who committed common assault by ‘thumping’ his partner, or causing actual or grievous bodily harm, would be eligible for release under the scheme unless he had been sentenced to four years or more in prison.

He also warned that plans to release prisoners up to 20 per cent of the way through their sentences would be a ‘mockery of justice’ and ‘affront to rule of law.’

This applies to offenders who are under an electronic tagging scheme that allows them to spend up to six months under curfew in their homes that they would otherwise have spent in jail.

They are currently entitled to be released on tags as little as 25 per cent of the way through their sentences but, because of the early release scheme due to start on Sept 10, it has been recalculated down to 20 per cent.

The Bible says,
Proverbs 11:21 Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished: but the seed of the righteous shall be delivered.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution  →

Release of Steven Ling

Steven Ling
Steven Ling

Among prisoners freed was Steven Ling, a convicted murderer.

Ling, now 49, was granted parole in July and has been released after serving 26 years of a life sentence. He was convicted in 1998 for the brutal Christmas Day murder of 29-year-old Joanne Tulip in 1997. Ling violated and stabbed Miss Tulip 60 times, in what the presiding judge described as a horrific act of violence. During his sentencing, the judge declared that Ling would remain in prison for as long as he posed a danger to women.

Despite these warnings, Ling is now a free man. His release, at a time when prison spaces are being prioritised for those involved in recent protests or social media controversies, has sparked outrage. We argue here that Steven Ling should have faced the death penalty:

The justice system’s priorities have shifted away from protecting the public, focusing instead on individuals whose offences lie more in speech than in violent crimes.

The release of such a one as Steven Ling underscores growing concerns about whether the safety of citizens is being compromised by a government intent on managing overcrowded prisons and responding to current political trends. Albeit that justice was never done for Joanne Tulip.

The Bible says,
Gen 9:6 Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.

Police persecute ex-Muslim

The state is also keen to protect its ideas and ideology, not least that of multi-culturalism.  That helps explain what Tim Dieppe has described as the Metropolitan Police’s ‘outrageous persecution’ of Hatun Tash.

The ex-Muslim turned Christian preacher has been repeatedly arrested at the behest of her Muslim tormentors. She carries a Koran with holes in it, to illustrate its shaky provenance. Yet when Muslim activists at Speakers’ Corner stole it from her, the Police arrested her, not them.

With the assistance of the Christian Legal Centre, Hatun Tash has now been awarded not just one, but two payouts of £10,000 from the Met for unlawful arrest at Speakers’ Corner.

More serious crimes

A man wielding a hedge trimmer after an altercation at a petrol station.
A man chasing a couple with a hedge trimmer after an altercation at a petrol station.

The recent arrest of a man in Greater Manchester highlights the increasing neglect of public safety.

A viral video shows a Muslim couple being chased by a man wielding a hedge trimmer after an altercation at a petrol station.

The footage captures the man retrieving the tool from his vehicle and charging toward the couple’s car as they quickly fled.

This incident, while shocking, underscores the troubling trend where serious threats to citizens’ safety are deprioritised, as the system diverts its focus to less critical offences. Such cases reflect how the balance between protecting the public and catering to political or social agendas is becoming increasingly skewed.

Muslim given suspended sentence for assault

In Bradford, a Muslim man berated three Muslim women, whom he knew, at a petrol station for not wearing Islamic dress and for wearing make-up. He then violently attacked them, a court heard.

The local paper reported that Muhammad Hassan, 26, grabbed the driver and slammed her head on to the dashboard of her vehicle. He then grabbed the second woman’s hair and punched her in the head before hitting the third woman.

Judge Colin Burn said: “Whatever the motivation was for this, it’s still utterly inadequate to justify the violence that you perpetrated against [the victims] when they were sitting in a car effectively cowering from you.

“The three people on the receiving end of your violence were women who were in a vulnerable situation. This was an extremely abusive, controlling and violent incident.”

Given such a summing up, we should expect a custodial sentence. But no. Hassan, from Bradford, was sentenced to six months in prison, suspended for two years. Compare that leniency to the sentences given to the Southport protestors.

Where is the duty of care?

As prisons in England and Wales near maximum capacity, the early release of inmates by Labour ‘to address the shortage of space’ is sparking concerns about the government’s duty of care.

There are concerns that without adequate measures to vet who is being released, the plan risks allowing violent offenders back into society prematurely. Questions are being raised about whether sufficient safeguards are in place to prevent potential harm, or if the focus is more on managing prison numbers than ensuring community safety.

Even more, there fear growing concerns that the Labour government may be prioritising freeing criminals over maintaining stringent protections, leading to heightened anxiety over public security.

This follows a stark warning from Charlie Taylor, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, who warned the ‘high risk of harm’ posed by the early release of violent criminals

He told the Telegraph that there was a danger former criminals may be let out to offend again.

‘The biggest risk would be a released offender slipping through the cracks” and going on to commit a serious crime because of rushed work.’

Read and pray

READ: Lev 19:35; Job 5:16; Job 11:14; Psa 37:9-10; Prov 13:23; Prov 22:8; Isa 28:9; Ezek 3:20; Hosea 10:13; Zeph 3:5; Rom 9:14.

PRAY: For the repeal of woke laws.
Pray for safety of everyone in the UK
Pray for victims of domestic violence, and other crimes in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Bill Gates and the New Malthusians

To commemorate the 100th anniversary of the first eugenics conference, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation put on a family planning conference this summer.

The conference, which began on 11 July and was co-hosted by the UK Department for International Development, included among its coalition partners such organizations as Planned Parenthood, Marie Stopes International, and the United Nations Populations Fund (UNFPA).

From Hard Eugenics to Soft Eugenics

The original conference that Bill Gates wished to commemorate was titled The First International Eugenics Congress. It was convened in London from 24-29 July, 1912, and was presided over by Leonard Darwin, the son of Charles Darwin. The conference was dedicated to Charles Darwin’s half-cousin Francis Galton (1822–1911). Galton invented the term Eugenics to describe his theory that man could be perfected through strategic breeding. His ideas that certain races are genetically superior to other races had a profound impact on later Nazi theorists.

The 1912 conference included an exhibit by the American Breeders’ Association, whose former president, Harry Laughlin, proposed to eradicate the “inferior” members of society through compulsory sterilization. The conference featured a presentation from Bleeker van Wagenen, who gave a report on the progress of sterilization laws in the United States and advocated compulsory sterilization as a means for improving the human gene pool.

Early 20th century Eugenics theory was often accompanied by the notion that economics can be improved by decreasing the surplus population. Such ideas were based on the theories of Thomas Malthus (1766 –1834) who suggested that the poor were draining the world’s recourses. One of Malthus’s solutions for reducing the surplus population was to introduce policies specifically designed to bring death to large numbers of peasants. For example, he encouraged poor people to move near swamps, because he knew that they would catch diseases there and begin dying off.

The conference that the Gates Foundation put on to commemorate The First International Eugenics Congress included no calls for forced sterilization, but Bill and Malinda Gates did pledge hundreds of millions of dollars to improve access to contraception in the developing world. Following in the footsteps of early 20th century social engineering theory, they echoed Malthus by suggesting that we have an economic responsibility to ensure that there are fewer people. Wendy Wright has rightly called this the “latest effort to blame children for poverty and women’s troubles.”

Bill Gates is quick to repudiate his dependence on Malthus. In an interview with PBS, he told Moyers that “The one issue that really grabbed me as urgent were issues related to population” and he shared how originally he “thought that the Malthusian principles applied at least in the developing countries.” Gates went on to say how he came to understand that “essentially Malthus was wrong” and that alternatives to Malthus’s doomsday scenarios included raising wealth, improving health and educating women.

But we should not be too quick to assume that Bill and Melinda Gates have completely abandoned their earlier Malthusian framework. On the contrary, Mr and Mrs Gates have both frequently drawn attention to the economic ramifications of there being too many people. This was made explicit by Melinda Gates in 2011 when she commented that “Government leaders…are now beginning to understand that providing access to contraceptives is a cost-effective way to foster economic growth…”

So what exactly is the relation between contraception and economic growth? The connection is simple: fewer people = more resources. This may not be the hard eugenics of Malthus, but it certainly involves what Andressen Blom and James Bell have appropriately termed “soft negative eugenics.” In an article for The American Thinker last June, Blom and Bell define soft eugenics as follows:

“for economic reasons governments should use taxpayer dollars to underwrite the decisions of citizens to pursue recreational sexual activity.  The underlying economic assumption is that the prospective children of the poor citizens likely to utilize such government-funded programs would be likely to hamper economic growth if they are born.”

Decreasing the Surplus Population

This is not the first time that Bill and Malinda Gates have ventured into population control. At the Technology, Entertainment and Design 2010 Conference, Bill Gates gave a talk in which he suggested that the solution to global warming is to have fewer people.

This is part of a new groundswell of interest in population control which posits a direct relationship between global warming and the amount of people on the earth. The Microsoft founder reduced our planet’s problem to a simple equation: CO2=P x S x E x C CO2 (total population-emitted CO2 per year) = P (people) x S (services per person) x E (average energy per service) x C (average CO2 emitted per unit of energy).

The goal, Gates said, was to “get this down to zero.” Referring to P(eople) specifically, he said, “Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”

That’s right. Rather than leading to more life, which was the original purpose of vaccines and healthcare, their great advantage in Gates’ mind is that they can lead to fewer people. While this is obviously true when it comes to contraception, it is hard to understand how vaccination is specifically related to a decrease in the population. (But hold onto that thought.)

The Gates Foundation are certainly doing all they can to decrease what it sees as surplus population. In May of this year, they gave a grant of $100,000 to researchers at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill to develop a new type of ultrasound which has been described as a “non-invasive, reversible form of birth control for men.” Already tested on animals, it would make a man infertile for up to six months. Nine other grants were given to other scientists attempting to create new forms of contraception.

Forced Sterilization

One of the coalition partners in last month’s conference was Planned Parenthood, whose founder Margaret Sanger hoped to “assist the race towards the elimination of the unfit.” Similarly, Marie Stopes International, who also had a prominent presence at the conference, was started by a woman who advocated for “the sterilization of those totally unfit for parenthood [to be] made an immediate possibility, indeed made compulsory.”  (To read more about forced sterilization in the 20th century, see my article ‘Social Engineering and the Dark Side of American Liberalism.’)

But while these organizations previously supported forced sterilization, surely no one in the West still thinks that the poor and ‘feeble minded’ ought to be subjected to compulsory sterilization, right? Well, not so fast. Consider the following facts:

The Hidden Truth About Vaccines and Forced Sterilization

Rather than leading to more life, which was the original purpose of vaccines and healthcare, their great advantage in Gates’ mind (at least according to his remarks at the Technology, Entertainment and Design 2010 Conference) is that they can lead to fewer people. While this is obviously true when it comes to contraception, it is hard to understand how vaccines are specifically related to a decrease in the population.

The connection between vaccines and population control becomes clearer if we consider an event that occurred in the early 1990’s. The World Health Organization, working under the control of the UN, launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of people in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines against tetanus. The project was supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, the UN Development Programme, and the US’s National Institutes of Health.

Tetanus is a potentially lethal infection caused by external wounds or cuts from things like rusty nails. There is nothing unusual in tetanus inoculations, which are routine in the Western World. But there was something that didn’t quite add up about these particular vaccinations.

For one thing, the WHO was choosing to only vaccinate females. For another thing, the girls they chose to vaccinate are primarily those between the ages of 15 and 45 (in Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.)

It wasn’t just disease experts who noticed that something was amiss. After all, it doesn’t take a great deal of intelligence to know that men and boys are more prone to wounds from cuts and rusty nails than ladies. So why was the WHO only choosing to vaccinate girls of child-bearing age?

To make matters more suspicious, the vaccination protocols were calling for multiple injections — three within three months and a total of five altogether. However, tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, so why this call for multiple inoculations?

These were the questions that Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, began asking and why they decided to have some vaccine samples tested.

The tests revealed that the tetanus vaccine contained human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). hCG is a natural hormone that is secreted during the initial stages of pregnancy. When this hormone is combined with the tetanus toxoid carrier, it tricks the body into thinking that hCG is an invading enemy, with the result that a woman’s body begins producing anti-hCG antibodies, making it impossible for her to ever maintain a pregnancy.

After a number of labs exposed that the vaccine was really a life-time birth control shot, WHO officials tried to keep things quiet and continued administering the anti-fertility injections. It was only after the courts intervened that the WHO was forced to stop administering the vaccine. Unfortunately, by then the damage had already been done and thousands of girls in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines had been rendered permanently infertile. The scandal made it all the way up to the Philippines Supreme Court. To quote from an article on Lifesite news,

LifeSiteNews.com reported that in 1995, the Catholic Women’s League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG, which when given in a vaccine permanently causes women to be unable to sustain a pregnancy. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.

Was the 1990s tetanus scandal simply a medical blunder? Hardly! For 20 years prior to the incident, WHO researchers had been actively involved in creating anti-fertility vaccines utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier. This was publically documented in medical journals from the 70s through to the 90s.

What could possibly have motivated the World Health Organization to knowingly, but covertly, sterilize thousands of women in third world countries? While we do not have sufficient information to answer this question for definite, the answer could have something to do with the fact that population control is once again a growing public concern among the world’s elite. Consider that

  • Population control seems to be the pet topic among those men who control much of the world’s wealth. Not only Bill Gates but also Warren Buffett and Ted Turner have all spoken publically in favour of drastically reducing the human species, and supported programs designed to eliminate the excess in babies. For example, in 1996, Ted Turner stated that, “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
  • In an interview with the New York Times in 2009, Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg alluded to the fact that abortion is all about getting rid of certain types of people that we do not want around: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
  • Echoing comments made by the Optimum Population Trust in 2007, The London School of Economics suggested in 2009 that the best way to combat global warming is to reduce the surplus population through contraception and abortion. Their logic is simple: more people = more polluters.
  • A 2007 report, written by specialist Professor Barry Walters for the Australian medical journal, called for couples with more than two children to be charged a lifelong tax to offset their extra offspring’s carbon dioxide emissions. Parents would be charged $5,000 a head for every child after their second, and an annual tax of up to $800.
  • In a 1981 interview, Thomas Ferguson of the United States Department Office of Population Affairs, commented that “we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”
  • College professors and leaders frequently cite the Georgia Guidestones to in arguing that that we should “maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” To achieve that, the human population would have to be thinned by 90%.
  • The Anglo-Dutch financial empire has been and still is committed to reducing the world’s population from the present 6.7 billion, to under 2 billion persons. This has been stated repeatedly in the post-war period by such leading spokesmen as Lord Bertrand Russell, Julian Huxley, and World Wildlife Fund founders Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and the still-living Prince Philip, who has reiterated many times his desire to see the human population thinned.
  • Robert McNamara of the World Bank has said, “Excessive population growth is the greatest single obstacle to the economic and social advancement of most of the societies in the developing world.”
  • An initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 Earth Charter reads, “The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.”
  • Dr. Henry Kissinger has said “World population needs to be decreased by 50%.”
  • Friends of the Earth founder, David Brower, has stated, “That’s the first thing to do, start controlling the population in affluent white America, where a child born to a white American will use about fifty times the resources of a child born in the black ghetto.” “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license…. All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
  • President Obama’s top science and technology advisor, John P. Holdren, has advocated the possibility of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children.
  • The Secretary of State for International Development, Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell MP, is a hard-line pro-abortionist in his ideal job.  In November 2010 he proposed to “hard-wire” abortion and contraceptive services into overseas development programmes.  In December 2010 this came to fruition as he announced plans to spend an extra £2.1 billion on programmes including abortion and contraception, drawing a rebuke from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.  The Governments’ abortion policy is now an integral part of their foreign aid packages.

 

WRITE: To your MP and ask your MP to protest to the Secretary of State for International Development about the way that Government money was used last month to commemorate the legacy of 20th century Eugenics.  Your MP’s address is House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA.  If you do not know who your MP is or wish to email your MP instead, click here to go direct to the UK Parliament’s list of MPs.

PRAY: That the Lord will continue to expose the evil being promoted by family planners and population control advocates.  Pray that the plans of Bill and Melinda Gates will be channelled towards life rather than death.  Pray that legislators overseas will become alert to the evil enclosed in the Trojan Horses of aid from the Gates Foundation and the UK Government.  Pray that God will grant Andrew Mitchell a spirit of repentance or remove him and that the UK’s pro-abortion policy will not stand.

 

Further Reading

 

JOIN or donate to Christian Voice and stand up for righteousness: