Presidents Trump & Putin at the news conference following their historic summit.
Presidents Trump & Putin at the news conference following their historic summit. Russian election meddling was blandly assumed by one media hack.
So President Donald Trump mixed up his ‘would’ and his ‘wouldn’t’? Apparently it happened in the press conference after his summit meeting with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin.
No collusion, but hacking
According to the BBC, Mr Trump insisted there was ‘no collusion at all’ between his campaign and Russia. Mr Putin laughed at the suggestion. The American press has been full of charges of this alleged ‘collusion’. However, US Special Counsel Robert Mueller has not yet alleged any.
The more serious charge is that of ‘election meddling’. That appears to mean attempts, successful or not, to hack into Democratic Party emails. That’s assuming the emails were not leaked by an insider.
The BBC reports twelve Russian nationals have been indicted by Mueller. The DNC leak showed that top Democrats preferred Mrs Clinton for the presidential nomination. In fact, they constantly worked against her left-wing challenger, Senator Bernie Sanders.
Election meddling
Wikileaks published the emails with ‘eighteen revelations’. Julian Assange has denied any Russians were behind what he described as leaks. But such is the feverish level of anti-Russian hysteria in US corridors, his denial simply would not do.
A reporter asked Mr Trump after the summit to condemn Russia and Mr Putin on election meddling. It was not even ‘alleged’, it was taken as fact. In reply, Mr Trump said his intelligence officials – including Director of Intelligence Dan Coats – have told him ‘they think it’s Russia’. Mr Putin, he continued, just told him it was not Russia.
‘I don’t see any reason why it would be,’ Mr Trump concluded, leaning toward the Russian professions of innocence over the apparent conclusions of his own officials.
All hell broke loose
As Mr Trump was flying home from Helsinki, all hell was breaking loose among the US elite.
Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called it a ‘shameful performance’ that was ‘thoughtless, dangerous and weak’. John Brennan, director of the CIA under Barack Obama, not given to understatement, said Mr Trump was guilty of treason.
On the Republican side, political consultant and Jeb Bush advisor Mike Murphy called it a ‘dark day’, after tweeting a string of invective. Former 2008 Republican presidential candidate John McCain said it was ‘one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in memory’.
‘The damage inflicted by President Trump’s naivete, egotism, false equivalence, and sympathy for autocrats is difficult to calculate,’ said the Arizona Republican senator. ‘But it is clear that the summit in Helsinki was a tragic mistake.’
Who are the critics?
Why are Mr Trump’s critics so quick to condemn Russia and President Putin? Why do they not want peace and some measure of tranquility which would allow normal people to trade and do business? Well, Senator McCain is chair of the Armed Services Committee. Senator Schumer, 66, has never had a job outside politics. The Intercept reports he raises millions of dollars for the Democrats from the finance industry. Moreover, that sector is heavily involved in armaments companies.
Mr Schumer voted for the Iraq war, taking at face value the tissue of lies about Saddam Hussein having weapons of mass destruction which were peddled by the same ‘Intelligence Community’ that now accuses Russia of election meddling. He warned of Iraq’s imaginary yet ‘vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons’. Like John McCain, he is a member of the US Council on Foreign Relations. Russia is a thorn in the side of the CFR’s globalism. And its president also opposes the advance of sodomy, a liberal sacred cow. That’s unforgivable to someone like Schumer.
Armaments companies’ funding
OpenSecrets.org reveals another Trump critic, Republican Congressman Michael Turner, received $161,000 from defense companies for his 2016 re-election campaign. He also serves on the Arms Services Committee and the Intelligence Committee.
On top of that, he is the liaison to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and has served as its president. ‘Russia absolutely meddled in our election,’ said the prominent warmonger.
Newt Gingrich is another top Republican who sits on the CFR. He called Mr Trump’s statements on intelligence agencies ‘the most serious mistake of his presidency’. Mr Gingrich is also a member of the secretive Bilderberg Group and the disreputable occultist Bohemian Grove.
In the media, the Drudge Report had a headline blaring that ‘Putin dominates’ the summit. Such an approach assumes a zero-sum game where there must be a ‘winner’ and a ‘loser’. On Fox News cable networks, normally pro-Trump, Neil Cavuto called the president’s performance ‘disgraceful’ and said it ‘sets us back a lot’. Fox News White House correspondent John Roberts opined ‘There is a growing consensus across the land tonight … that the president threw the United States under the bus.’
Barrage of criticism
In the face of this barrage of criticism, Mr Trump could easily have stood firm, remembered the intelligence community’s past failings and observed that they haven’t come up with anything stronger than alleged attempts to discredit Mrs Clinton. He could have said she herself did the best job in that direction.
Instead, says the BBC, Mr Trump said he had reviewed the transcript and ‘realised’ he needed to clarify. ‘In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word “would” instead of “wouldn’t”,’ he said. ‘The sentence should have been: “I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t’ or why it wouldn’t be Russia”. Sort of a double negative.’
The US president added: ‘I accept our intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election took place. Could be other people also. A lot of people out there.’
US meddling
Speaking of ‘a lot of people out there’, Mr Trump could also have observed that the US has a long history of interfering in other countries and their elections.
A Channel4 ‘factcheck’ says: ‘The west – and particularly the US – have a long history of rigging polls, supporting military coups, channeling funds and spreading political propaganda in other countries.’
Professor Dov Levin is from the Institute for Politics and Strategy at Carnegie Mellon University. He reckons ‘60 different independent countries have been the targets’ of post-war US interventions.
Channel4 goes on: ‘According to Levin’s research, those countries where secret tactics have been deployed by the US include: Guatemala, Brazil, El Salvador, Haiti, Panama, Israel, Lebanon, Iran, Greece, Italy, Malta, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, South Vietnam and Japan.
‘For Russia, the list of covert interventions includes: France, Denmark, Italy, Greece, West Germany, Japan, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Congo, Venezuela, Chile, Costa Rica, and the US.’
US meddled in Kenya
This author had personal knowledge of US meddling in Kenya’s constitution referendum in 2010. Then Ambassador Michael Ranneberger worked with EU counterparts to secure a vote to adopt a South African-style constitution. In addition to its liberalism, it cemented the role of Sharia courts in the country. Even today, his two immediate predecessors, Mark Bellamy and Johnnie Carson, argue openly for more intervention by the US and ‘external partners’ in Kenya in particular and African nations in general.
On top of that, there is much recent history of Western governments providing funding for NGOs dedicated to overturning Christian morality in African nations. Legal access to abortion, the adoption of gay rights and feminist empowerment are the three favourites of Western governments. Naturally, they are assisted by a plethora of philanthropic -so to speak – western funders, led by George Soros and his Open Society Institute and OS Foundations.
The UK Foreign Office, one has to say, almost exists to interfere in the affairs of foreign nations.
The real election meddling story
Which leads us to the real meddling story hiding away behind all the anti-Russian rhetoric. From June 2016, a British ex-intelligence office, Christopher Steele, supplied the US Democratic Party with gossip on Donald Trump’s business dealings in Russia. Only when Donald Trump was elected in November of that year did the Democrats stop paying Steele’s firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, for information through the intermediary Fusion GPS.
But Christian Voice discovered that Steele linked up with MI6 officers during the time he was working on the dossier memos he drip-fed to the Democrats. Not only that, but his consultant at Orbis was MI6 man Pablo Miller. Miller was Russian double-agent Sergei Skripal’s handler in Salisbury. A US expert in Russia and its intelligence services has said there is no doubt the Trump dosser was not written by Steele but by a Russian intelligence officer. And with which Russian intelligence officer was Christopher Steele in touch through his MI6 pal Miller? Step forward Sergei Skripal.
Clearly, President Trump is wary of vested interests at home. That explains his partial backtrack here and his earlier two half-hearted missile strikes against Syria. He had to be seen to be doing something, but he tried to keep it as inoffensive, particularly to the Russians, as possible. He cannot always rein in his State Department and the Pentagon. Nevertheless, moving the US embassy to Jerusalem and appointing at least one pro-life Supreme Court judge (the jury is out on the next one) have been matters of principle.
But his meeting with Kim Jong-Un, his advice to Mrs May on the EU – best not walk away – and his attempt at a reset with Russia all speak of a business man. For the Donald, above all, doing a deal is what motivates him. There are times like 1939 and over the Falklands when a nation has to stand up to an aggressor. But in ordinary times, doing deals, trading, living in peace, is better than daggers drawn. (Except to the armaments industry of course.)
Later, Mr Trump tweeted: ‘So many people at the higher ends of intelligence loved my press conference performance in Helsinki. Putin and I discussed many important subjects at our earlier meeting. We got along well which truly bothered many haters who wanted to see a boxing match. Big results will come!’
He added: ‘Some people HATE the fact that I got along well with President Putin of Russia. They would rather go to war than see this. It’s called Trump Derangement Syndrome!’
Keep praying for peace.
We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Mr Gatehouse saw all sorts of dodgy images literally through what we were supposed to understand was a bottle of vodka. The barman morphed into a V-for-Vendetta Anonymous mask. Why? Then Russian dolls, clowns, Mickey Mouse, RT, Vladimir Putin. Ours is ‘a world of total relativism’, he said. Speak for yourself, Gabs!
Theresa versus Sergei
The White Helmets sent emails to musician Roger Waters asking for support. He denounced them on stage instead.
Then we moved to Douma and Theresa May. She was obviously someone we could trust. Unlike those dodgy Russians. She said: ‘If they are found to be responsible, the regime and its backers, the Russians, must be held to account’.
Now the Gabriel Gatehouse BBC Newsnight video switched to Sergei Lavrov. (Dodgy Russian, he is.) He had information that the UK had orchestrated the Douma incident, he said, through the allegedly humanitarian ‘White Helmets’ who work in jihadist-controlled areas of Syria.
But it is a fact that the ‘White Helmets’ were the only source for the information for the Douma attack. The UK astonishingly set up and continue to fund the White Helmets group. So we should expect the ‘White Helmets’ to advance the UK position on Social Media and in films to Reuters. Because the UK line still is that Assad must go and Syria be turned over to murderous jihadis. So the trustworthy one is actually dodgy and the dodgy one more likely to be telling the truth. Oh dear.
And then BBC Newsnight wheeled out Ben Nimmo. He used to be press officer for NATO. Now he appears to work for something called the ‘Digital Forensic Research Lab’ at the Atlantic Council.
Maram Susli, ‘Syrian Girl’ or ‘Partisan Girl’, has built up a huge YouTube following, writing mainly on Syria. She is a real person.
The Atlantic Council has been busy recently. It sent out Dr Hisham Hellyer to berate the Christians who visited Syria the weekend before last. It’s funded by a host of arms manufacturers. Moreover, its funders depend on there being a ‘Russian Threat’.
Without any sense of shame, Ben Nimmo was still talking about ‘Russian Trolls’ on Twitter. Earlier, he said they included UK pensioner Ian Shilling and Syrian-Australian activist Maram Susli . The latter goes both as SyrianGirlPartisan and plain Syrian Girl on YouTube. But neither is a Russian ‘troll’, as Mr Nimmo has suggested.
Mr Gatehouse said accurately that the Douma attack either happened or it didn’t. But he went on: “Meanwhile, in the world of information warfare, the Russians are on the offensive.” Is not the BBC also on the information warfare offensive?
The Blair lies that led to the Iraq war
Tony Blair lied about Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction and ’45 minutes’ and poisoned the well of public trust.
Newsnight continued with the Russian Ambassador reminding us of what Tony Blair said in March 2003, preparing the UK for war with Iraq. ‘My judgement as prime minister is that this threat is real, growing and of an entirely different nature to any conventional threat to our security that Britain has faced before.’
‘Russia is using a mix of methods to produce a potent propaganda cocktail’, Mr Gatehouse went on. Ben Nimmo came back to speak of Russian ‘state-controlled sites and diplomats’. As if the BBC is independent. Then ‘you have allegedly independent websites and broadcasters,’ he said. (Like the various UK news mainstream media (MSM)?) You also have trolls and bots, apparently. But ‘they all work together, they all amplify the same message’, as if the British MSM and Government do not do the same.
Media Group-Speak
Tom Daley and Dustin Lance Black at the Evening Standard Film Awards from a gushing report in the Irish Times. The odd commentator might be critical, but MSM editors dare not say a word against them.
And we have seen them do it not merely on Syria, Salisbury and Russia. The media group-speak is there on abortion. Most recently there is unanimity on whipped-up opposition to pavement activists.
It is there on sodomy against the name of which none dare speak. MSM group-speak is present referring to gays having ‘husbands’ and lesbians ‘wives’. Or about Tom Daley and Mr Black ‘having a baby together’. It is even there on transgenders. They are always called by their chosen gender rather than their real one.
It is a real challenge for the prophets of God to know truth from fiction. Group-speak affects Parliament. We even have to remember Christian MPs are fallible human beings like us, with foibles and mini-agendas. It is all the more reason to be grounded in the word of God.
Isaiah 40:8 The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.
And we thank God for alternative media like Christian Voice, Off-Guardian, RT, the Way, Antiwar.com, Christian Concern. Journalists Patrick Cockburn and Robert Fisk and often the BBC’s Jeremy Bowen are refreshingly off-message on the Middle East. It would be remiss not to mention journalists like Neil Clark and Vanessa Beeley and tweeters such as @Ian56789 and @PartisanGirl. They may not always be right, but they bring perspectives and information. All this can be weighed against scripture.
Truth has fallen
Ian Shilling, ‘Ian56’, is a real man, not a ‘bot’ and not a Russian ‘troll’.
For BBC Newsnight, Ian56, despite being a real man, is ‘a Russian bot’. Do they know what a robot is? And if you so much as mention ‘False Flag’, you are a Russian stooge. More footage of Mr Gatehouse squinting through the bottle. And then we discover he can speak some Russian. He contended that states used to try to persuade the public to trust their version of events. But these days, they want us ‘to trust nobody’. However, that is just his contention.
We British, in our law-making, have rebelled against every one of the Ten Commandments. But recently, ‘Truth has fallen’ as Isaiah put it. There was a time when the public trusted what their leaders told them. They may have been wrong to do so. But they trusted them as men of honour anyway. With Tony Blair that went. With David Cameron trust was consigned to history as he shamelessly pretended in Parliament there were 70,000 moderate Syrian men to fight ISIS.
Sadly, Theresa May is pouring more poison down an already contaminated well of public trust. She has tried to pretend there is evidence implicating the Russian state in the Salisbury poisoning and the Syrian state over Douma. But there isn’t. All she has is that mysterious concoction ‘intelligence’. There was ‘intelligence’ about Iraq’s ‘weapons of mass destruction’ which could reach the UK ‘in 45 minutes’. If intelligence is something posted by the White Helmets on social media it is valueless.
Dr Tara McCormack has been on RT. Enough said.
WhatAboutism
But to raise such valid questions is to be guilty, says Mr Gatehouse, of ‘WhatAboutism’. As in ‘What about Iraq’?
That dealt with, he turned his fire on a group of academics known as the ‘Working group on Syria, propaganda and media.’ He interviewed Dr Tara McCormack of Leicester University. She made the valid point that in the current atmosphere, ‘You are a traitor if you believe in due process.’ But, Gabriel reminded us, she has appeared on the Russian channel RT!
Then philosopher Onora O-Neill warned against ‘the amount of anonymous communication that we receive.’ It was a peculiar thing for Baroness O’Neill of Bengarve CH CBE FRS FBA FMedSci to say. Everything we write in Christian Voice is referenced by links to real media. We put anything anonymous in the bin. Where we can, we go back to original sources. Dr O’Neill’s target was a classic and ridiculous straw man.
Don’t go online. Watch BBC Newsnight!
Rev Canon Giles Fraser is in charge of St Mary’s Newington in South London.
Newsnight followed up the Gatehouse video with a discussion. Evan Davies interviewed one Peter Pomerantsev and Alistair Campbell, Tony Blair’s spin doctor. Campbell put pressure in 2003 on the ‘spooks’ to ‘sex up’ the ‘dodgy dossier’ and take Britain to war in Iraq. Pomerantsev makes his living out of talking up Russian ‘disinformation’. There was no opposing view. They all agreed one should not ‘go online for the truth’. No, you should watch the BBC and read the Guardian! You really couldn’t make it up.
Then, finally, Evan Davies interviewed Rev Giles Fraser. Canon Fraser went to Syria as part of the Christian group with Baroness Cox two weekends ago. A Guardian journalist slammed him for it and for pictures and commentary he tweeted. Yes, he agreed, his tweets could have been better phrased. Mr Davies asked: ‘Are you a useful idiot?’ ‘I may be an idiot’, replied his reverence. ‘But I’m not sure I’m that useful’. Since Giles Fraser humiliated the high priest of evolution, Richard Dawkins, with an innocuous question about the title of Darwin’s book on the BBC4 Today Programme we have had a soft spot for him here.
The leaves of Russian Kale can be cut regularly and more leaves then grow. But does growing it turn your vegetable garden into a Kremlin plot?
Russian Kale growing well in a raised bed at Wernlwyd – but you won’t find it growing at the White House or Chevening, the UK Foreign Secretary’s country pad.
It is a tasty and dependable addition to any vegetable garden, but it is one which no politician’s gardener will not be putting on the menu any time soon.
Its Latin name is Brassica napus pabularia, and it produces a succession of sweet full-flavoured leaves. If regularly harvested, and protected from those white butterflies, it will resprout with new tender leaves right through the growing season.
Yes, it’s Russian Kale
Its English name? Russian Kale. People sometimes add the adjective ‘Red’ because the main vein (or midrib) can be a shade of purple, especially in young plants. Or, if you remember the cold war …
Russian Kale likes cool, temperate climates and is resistant to bolting. However, in its second year it will produce hundreds of yellow flowers. Pods will ripen in June to July, yielding thousands of seeds ready to replant or save for the following spring. If seed falls to the ground, look out for Russian Kale volunteer plants, proving that the Russians are everywhere, ready to turn your garden into a Kremlin plot.
The thousands of seeds from just one plant are called ‘redundancy’. Many plants produce vastly more seed than one would think necessary. But the Almighty has put this abundance of seed in place. Furthermore, it means this author has several thousand seeds to distribute to those who would like some Russian interference in their garden.
Psalm 104:14 He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth;
Kremlin connections?
The leaves of Russian Kale can be cut regularly and more leaves then grow. But does growing it turn your vegetable garden into a Kremlin plot?
If you are already a member of Christian Voice, you do not need a secret Russian communications system. Simply send a stamped addressed envelope to the Christian Voice office for your seeds.
We shall also send at least a hundred Russian Kale seeds to every new member who joins in August.
Both offers will be subject to first come first served. When the seed runs out, that’s it until next year.
Growing Russian Kale does of course raise suspicions over a possible direct connection to the Kremlin. It will be no surprise if President Putin has personally authorised every Russian Kale seed and sent them out to meddle in vegetable plots across the West. Expect a US Senate Committee to confirm this attack on our bland way of life very soon. Well, the name gives it away, doesn’t it? It’s Russian Kale, after all. It must be dangerous to NATO and its military complex.
But all I know is, it’s prolific and tasty. We shred the mature leaves finely and simply stir-fry in olive oil or butter. Or you can add young leaves to salad. Plant now, and you will just about get a crop before winter. Wait for the spring, and you’ll have veg for months. Your garden needs a Russian reset.
Attack on Nord Stream 2
Paul Craig Roberts
Meanwhile, across the pond, any hopes Donald Trump had of a reset in trade relations with Russian have been scuppered by the veto-proof sanctions bill passed almost unanimously by Congress and the Senate. However, it’s just a clumsy attempt to promote US shale gas at the expense of Russian natural gas. Moreover it could easily backfire, as even the Washington Post is pointing out. Who destroyed the Russo-German Nord Stream 2 pipeline? And the EU does much more trade with Russia than does the US anyway. Russia will just trade elsewhere, as Bloomberg reports.
But symbolically the bill is bad for US-Russian relations. Already, according to the Independent, Russian expulsions of US diplomats have increased tensions. And that is precisely why the military-industrial complex like the sanctions bill just as much as the US shale gas industry. After all, it would never do if peace were to break out, now would it? Indeed former US Assistant Treasury Secretary Paul Craig Roberts told RT these ‘interest groups’ ‘put their interests ahead of normalizing relations between nuclear powers’. We should be in much prayer for peace and against these men:
Psalm 140:2 Which imagine mischiefs in their heart; continually are they gathered together for war.
Administration, jobs and legacy
Where does all this leave President Trump’s domestic policy, his ‘West Wing’ administration and his legacy? It is hard to keep up with the comings and goings in his office. Is the man as shambolic as this in the appointments he makes in his business empire? Or is it just the ‘Deep State’, what we call the ‘Establishment’, that is out to destabilise him?
Donald Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. Will his Supreme Court appointments define his legacy?
Wherever there are people in the world, they need jobs. Donald Trump promised much to the ‘rust belt’ workers of the US. We have seen signs of him reaching out to the unions but nothing much concrete yet, unless the mainstream media is keeping something from us.
But despite anything immediately visible, says Breitbart, a recent poll shows US working class voters believe Mr Trump’s Republicans, rather than the Democrats, ‘will help improve the economy and create jobs’.
President Trump’s real legacy could yet be in the US Supreme Court. He has already filled one vacancy with constitutionalist Neil Gorsuch. Three justices are now 78 or older. If two of those die or retire, the President’s nominees could put a brake on liberal sacred cows such as abortion, gay rights and transgenderism for a generation. Continue to pray:
1Timothy 2:2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.
George Soros has funded the Ukrainian street uprisings through the Open Society Institute.
George Soros: funded the violent Ukrainian street uprisings through his Open Society Institute.
Billionaire financier George Soros was behind the Ukrainian uprising which cost dozens of lives and toppled elected President Viktor Yanukovych, Christian Voice has learned.
Soros helped finance the so-called ‘Arab Spring’, and as long as go as 2011, Russia Today ran a story about Soros wanting to ‘do a Libya’ on Ukraine. It said the concerns were ‘openly voiced by Yulia Timoshenko in 2008.’ (Yulia Timoshenko co-led the Orange Revolution and was the first female Prime Minister of Ukraine.)
Infowars says: In response to the accusations leveled by Aleksandr Yefremov, the Soros Foundation “said in a special statement that all funds allocated for Ukrainian programs are being spent on the development of the open and democratic society and also for helping Ukrainian citizens, who suffered from the effects of the international financial crisis.”
But that’s not the whole story. Soros has set up and funded an organisation called Spilna Sprava, translated as “Common Cause,” through the Open Society Institute. According to Infowars, the ‘Open Society Institute, now known as Open Society Foundations (OSF), doles out grants to activist NGOs in central Europe attempting to undermine the Russian Federation.’
Spilna Sprava is mentioned in the 2009 annual report of the International Renaissance Foundation (IRF), an organization described as “an integral part of the Open Society Institute network (established by American philanthropist George Soros) that incorporates national and regional foundations in more than thirty countries around the world, including Africa, Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.” IRF cooperates with the International Monetary Fund and European banksters interested in “economic reforms” and “integration processes and trends” in Ukraine and Moldova.
Alexander Danilyuk, leader of Soros-financed Ukrainian pro-EU opposition group Spilna Sprava.
The pro-EU violence was not confined to ransacking government buildings and walking around with baseball bats. Russia Today claims that the former chief of Ukraine’s Security Service confirmed allegations that snipers who killed dozens of people during the violent unrest in Kiev operated from a building controlled by the opposition on Maidan Square. Russia Today may be a Putin-friendly news source, but the evidence they report seems to indicate that there is a lot more to the story of the Ukrainian uprising than is being told in the British and American press.
However, the BBC reports on an embarrassing tape which has come to light in which senior US officials discuss in a foul-mouthed exchange which opposition leader they would like to install in Ukraine.
The leader of Spilna Sprava, Alexander Danilyuk, fled Ukraine in early February and is now reportedly in the UK. He did not own up to Open Society funding of his far-right group in an interview he gave to Voice of Russia. His group, along with other pro-EU and crypto-fascist groups who comprise the ‘Maidan’ movement, succeeded in Mr Soros’s aim of toppling both the Ukrainian government and the democratically-elected president. Fears have been voiced in Israel that the unrest is now spilling over into anti-Semitism.
An ‘Open letter on the Future of Ukraine‘ was published last month and signed by a number of intellectuals, Eurocrats and globalsts. Arguing against Yanukovich and his desire to step away from the EU in favour of closer ties with Russia, it said:
The new authoritarians in Kyiv should know that there will be a high price to pay for their repressive policies and for abandoning the European aspirations of the people. It is not too late for us to change things for the better and prevent Ukraine from becoming a dictatorship. Passivity in the face of the authoritarian turn in Ukraine and the country’s reintegration into a newly expanding Russian imperial sphere of interests pose a threat to the European Union’s integrity
And also a threat to its expansionist plans, the business interests of George Soros, and the desire of American globalists to sideline Russia and undermine or annex its allies. Similar sentiments helped mobilise the medacious and tragic Western support of the Islamist rebels in Syria, a key Russian middle-eastern ally.
The letter was signed by former foreign ministers Ana Palacio of Spain and Bernard Kouchner of France, and Chris Stone and Aryeh Neier of the Open Society Institute of George Soros.
Timothy Garton Ash – globalist
Several of the signatories, including Timothy Garton-Ash, Professor of European Studies at Oxford, are also members of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) founded in 2007. The letter was also signed by the ECFR’s director, Blairite Mark Leonard.
The ECFR in turn has strong links with the globalist Bilderberg group and appears to be modelled on another globalist think-tank and collection of the rich and powerful, the American Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). We have analysed some of the linking personnel HERE.
Whether it has been Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria or now Ukraine, George Soros’s ability to foment unrest against governments that are not advancing his financial interests, are not ‘democratic’ enough or are too close to Russia through his Open Society funding of violent opposition groups is responsible for countless loss of life in every country in which he has meddled.
Let us pray that he, and the rest of the ‘Kings of the Earth’ spoken about in Psalm 2, will be brought to account. And let us pray that the Lord will raise up leaders in Ukraine not funded by East of West, but after his own heart.
Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)
Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.
