21 May 2025

The Children’s Well-being and Schools Bill is going through parliament.

The Bill is perhaps the most brazen assault yet on parental freedom in Britain.

Hidden beneath language of care and protection is a scheme of control.

The proposed universal register of children not in school and the state’s power to refuse a family’s request to home educate are clear markers of an institution no longer willing to trust its citizens.

Such measures presume that parents are guilty until proven innocent — that the default guardian of the child is not mother or father, but a local authority officer with a clipboard and a mandate.

This bill is a direct affront to the Christian understanding of the family. God gave children to parents, not governments. And while society may provide support structures, it must never overstep and seize the authority to dictate how that sacred stewardship is carried out.

Support Home Schooling →

Parental freedom at risk

The state’s creeping hand into the realm of home-schooling must be recognised for what it is: a moral affront to the God-ordained order of family and freedom.

The Bible says,
Proverbs 22:6 Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.

The right to educate one’s child belongs not to the government, but to parents — as affirmed not only by Scripture but by long-standing British legal tradition.

Education should not the state’s tool to shape obedient citizens to its liking, it is a parental duty, and any legitimate schooling system must support that, not replace it.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

EHCR Human Rights Protocol

The Universal Declaration of EHCR Human Rights Protocol 1, Article 2 is explicit: “No person shall be denied a right to an education. In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teaching, the State shall respect the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.”

Yet politicians increasingly treat that principle as optional. Today’s government insists it is simply ensuring “standards” and “safeguarding,” but what it is actually doing is building a bureaucratic apparatus to intrude, monitor, and dictate how children are raised.

Christian Voice has repeatedly warned of this shift. The slow erosion of parental authority in Britain is not accidental — it is the fruit of a worldview that places trust in the state rather than in God-given families. Once the state believes it owns the right to educate, it will not stop at “support.” It will legislate, coerce, and eventually penalise those who dissent.
Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Germany’s shadow: A cautionary tale for free nations

For anyone tempting to dismiss these concerns as overreaction, one need only look across the Channel. In Germany, homeschooling is not merely discouraged — it is outlawed. Christian families who refuse to subject their children to state ideology have seen their children forcibly removed and placed in care. This is not fiction; this is modern European policy, unfolding just a few hundred miles from Westminster.

Such control springs from a fundamental mistrust of parents and an arrogant belief in the state as the sole custodian of “proper” values. What Christian Voice sees in Germany is not progressive governance — it is statist paternalism of the most dangerous kind. If parents cannot choose how to raise and educate their children without threat of punishment, they are no longer free people. They are state-dependent subjects.

If Britain continues to follow this trajectory, we may soon see a similar regime here — one that polices educational choices, insists on ideological compliance, and punishes those who resist. This is not just about homeschooling. It is about whether families or bureaucrats have the final say over the hearts and minds of the next generation.

Indoctrination disguised as education

History offers grim warnings. In Mussolini’s Italy and Stalin’s Soviet Union, education was not about learning — it was about loyalty. Curricula were crafted to reinforce state dogma, and children were taught to revere the government above truth, conscience, or God. Dissenting parents were ignored, ridiculed, or punished. Schools became factories of political conformity.

The modern British classroom is not free from this danger. When “citizenship” classes are loaded with critical race theory, when biology lessons deny biological reality, and when early sex education pushes the boundaries of decency, we are no longer educating — we are indoctrinating. And when parents attempt to shield their children from this, they are met not with understanding, but hostility.

Christian parents pulling their children from such environments are not fringe outliers, they are faithful defenders of truth. It is not fear or ignorance that drives them, but wisdom and discernment. They see what the state refuses to admit: that its schools are no longer neutral.

Blaming parents for state failures

The government’s justification for this unprecedented intrusion is both flimsy and offensive. We are told that children must be monitored to prevent abuse, that homeschoolers are a blind spot in the system. But this is a lie. The most tragic recent cases of abuse — such as that of Sara Sharif — occurred in traditional schools, under the nose of trained teachers who failed to act.

The truth is this: the state’s own education system is broken. Nearly half of secondary school leavers are functionally illiterate. British employers report that school leavers are unprepared for work or life. Comprehensive schools are breeding grounds for confusion, despair, and in some cases, danger. And yet, instead of cleaning its own house, the state turns its eye on parents who have done the responsible thing and taken education into their own hands.

Christian Voice will not allow such scapegoating to go unchallenged. Homeschooling families are not the problem. They are the solution to a system that has lost both its moral compass and academic credibility.

Defending common law and Biblical order

The right to educate one’s own child is not a recent invention. It is rooted in English Common Law, grounded in Scripture, and codified in the Education Act of 1996, Section 7– states: “The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall cause him to receive efficient full-time education suitable—
(a)to his age, ability and aptitude, and

(b)to any special educational needs (in the case of a child who is in the area of a local authority in England) or additional learning needs (in the case of a child who is in the area of a local authority in Wales)] he may have,

either by regular attendance at school or otherwise”.

That Act did not grant the right to home educate — it recognised what was already there: that parents are the primary educators of their children, and the state is a supporting actor, not the lead.

Government’s attempt to upend this framework is a direct assault on both legal precedent and moral responsibility. It is a soft tyranny, disguised as care. Critical race theory, radical gender ideology, and sexual content cloaked in “inclusivity” are being embedded into lesson plans. And those who object are to be registered, reported, and restricted.

Christian Voice says enough. The battle for our children is a battle for the future. And in this battle, we will stand, speak, and defend the sacred role of parents as ordained by God Himself: to teach their children the way they should go, that when they are old, they will not depart from it (Proverbs 22:6).

Support home schooling in England & Wales →

German Home-schooling Family Allowed to Stay in United States →

NHS to declare that sex is a matter of biology →

Medway Council took children because home ‘untidy’ →

Swedish Social Services Snatch Christian Homeschooler and Jail Father →

Read and pray

READ: Gen 1:27; Deut 6:6-7; Prov 22:6; Eph 6:1-5; Luke 2:51.

PRAY: For parents who are currently homeschooling their children. Pray for the minds of our children and young people.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Virgin Island’ misguided quest for intimacy

Makeda

14 May 2025

First Look at Channel 4's Virgin Island | Channel 4

Channel 4’s Virgin Island reality show is marketed as a “s*x and intimacy retreat” for adult virgins to overcome their supposed social anxiety and sexual inexperience.

The series follows 12 adults who have never had s*x before, who travel to a retreat in Croatia to complete a range of tasks in the hope of losing their virginity.

But beneath its glossy exterior lies a deeply troubling agenda—normalising fornication, sexual experimentation, and the rejection of biblical values, all under the guise of therapy.

The programme features sexologists, surrogate partners, and sexually explicit scenes, pushing participants toward physical intimacy without any regard for the sanctity of sex as defined by God. It treats virginity not as a virtue, but as a disorder to be treated with physical practice.

Rather than encouraging modesty, restraint, and godly purpose in relationships, Virgin Island glorifies self-gratification. It repackages moral compromise as healing, leading many into error.

1 Corinthians 6:18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

A nation desensitised

Despite some backlash on social media, Channel 4 proceeded with airing Virgin Island in a 9 p.m. slot, fully aware of its explicit nature. Scenes involving physical demonstrations between contestants and sexologists left viewers who prefer to stay anonymous visibly uncomfortable and disturbed.

While society has pushed the envelope on sexual content for years, even secular viewers recognised that the programme crossed a line. But shock alone is not enough—we must discern and speak truth.

As Christians, we must resist not only immorality but also the media forces that seek to dull our spiritual senses.
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

A culture feeding on vulnerability

Virgin Island claimed to help individuals with self-worth and confidence, yet what it offered was public exposure and private degradation. Surrogate sexual activity was broadcast for entertainment, not healing.

This is not compassion. It is the commodification of brokenness. Rather than guiding people to true identity in Christ, the show strips participants of dignity and modesty, selling their vulnerability for ratings.

2 Timothy 3:1–3This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves… without natural affection… despisers of those that are good.

Where is the accountability? When human dignity is traded for clicks and conversations, it becomes clear we are witnessing a society that loves pleasure more than it loves righteousness.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Virginity shamed, lust glorified

The core premise of Virgin Island is that virginity is abnormal. But Scripture teaches the opposite. Virginity, when preserved in honour before marriage, is a testimony to obedience and self-control.

The world calls this backward. God calls it holy.

Hebrews 13:4 Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

Channel 4 has used this programme to flip good and evil on their heads. It mocks those who choose to wait, and exalts those who reject restraint. It offers no place for godly conviction—only indulgence disguised as self-expression.

Clarion Call to Christians: Stand for Truth

In the face of Virgin Island and similar programming, Christians cannot afford to remain silent. We must stand firmly, not just against explicit content, but against the worldview that makes it possible—one that detaches sex from covenant and confuses freedom with sin.

Ephesians 5:11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.

Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

Let Virgin Island serve not only as a warning, but as a wake-up call. We must raise our voices, guard our children, and uphold the biblical standard of purity in a world determined to tear it down.

Pray

PRAY: Pray for the UK. Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

‘Protect the Dolls’: Misleading appeal

Makeda

13 May 2025

A smiling Pedro Pascal wore on of the T-shirts in London, days after the supreme court ruling. Photograph: Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images

London Fashion Week may have showcased glamorous looks, but what took centre stage was not couture—it was a political statement. Designer Conner Ives took a bow in a T-shirt reading “Protect the Dolls,” a euphemism for “trans-identified” males, positioning them as vulnerable and oppressed. Yet for many, this is not fashion, it is indoctrination.

Two months later, the T-shirt has become a runaway hit. Celebrities like Troye Sivan and Pedro Pascal have helped glamorise the slogan, even in the wake of a landmark ruling affirming that legal references to women mean biological women. Instead of respecting that legal clarity, this shirt defiantly muddies the water.

By aligning himself with a slogan that subverts truth, Ives casts fashion as a weapon in the culture war. The aim? Normalising gender ideology and trivialising the reality of biological sex under the guise of solidarity.

Stop Transgenderism Now! →

A £75 Lie: How the culture war is being monetised

Retailing at £75 and with nearly 5,000 orders, the “Protect the Dolls” shirt isn’t just a statement—it’s a cash machine. According to Ives, the shirt has raised £380,000 for Trans Lifeline, a group promoting trans ideology under the banner of mental health support.

It is worth asking: when did charitable giving turn into moral coercion? Christian charities, pro-life groups, and faith-based shelters struggle for funds, yet a slogan steeped in ideology raises hundreds of thousands in a month. The market isn’t rewarding compassion—it’s rewarding conformity.

This is not grassroots activism. It’s a well-oiled machine turning political slogans into currency. And for Christians, it’s a reminder of what happens when the marketplace embraces lies over truth.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Subverting the call to protection

“Protect the Dolls” pretends to speak up for the vulnerable. But unlike the biblical call to defend the widow, the orphan, and the poor, this call promotes confusion over creation. It’s a perversion of Christian compassion.

The slogan elevates self-identification above biological reality, as if subjective feelings should replace objective truth. It encourages society to “protect” those who deny their God-given sex—an inversion of the biblical order of male and female.

Christian love protects through truth, not affirmation of lies. This slogan presents a counterfeit gospel—one where feelings are sacred, and facts are oppression.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Red carpet rebels

The red carpet is no stranger to virtue-signalling, but this time it has become a pulpit for woke theology. When Troye Sivan performed at Coachella in the shirt, and Pedro Pascal wore it to a movie premiere, they weren’t just being trendy—they were preaching ideology.

Their message is clear: biological truth is bigotry, and “allyship” means promoting falsehood. This is not about kindness or inclusion. It’s about reshaping the cultural narrative to erase God’s design for gender.

These men are being hailed as “real allies,” but to whom? Not to truth. Not to women. And certainly not to the children being fed confusion in the name of acceptance.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

Clothing as indoctrination

T-shirts have long been tools of expression—but what happens when expression turns into indoctrination? Ives’s slogan is being worn not just at fashion shows but at protests, on public transport, and across social media. This isn’t fashion. It’s a billboard for gender ideology.

We are being told that a simple T-shirt is a political revolution. But Christians must ask: why is there such hunger to broadcast this lie everywhere, from tube stations to red carpets? Because if a lie is repeated often enough, people begin to believe it.

Unlike gospel messages, which invite reflection, these shirts demand conformity. Disagree, and you’re labelled a bigot. This isn’t free speech. It’s coerced allegiance.

Marketing mythology

Activists claim the T-shirt’s power lies in its simplicity. But it’s that very simplicity that makes it dangerous. “Protect the Dolls” doesn’t explain who the dolls are, what they believe, or why they need protection. It leaves room for manipulation and moral coercion.

Charlie Craggs and others argue that messages like these “get read” because they’re stark. But slogans without substance are the perfect vehicles for half-truths. They offer no nuance, no context—just emotional pressure.

The Christian must see through this. Not all simple messages are true. Jesus wept. God is love. Christ is risen. These are simple—and they’re true. “Protect the Dolls”? That’s simple—and it’s false.

Christians must not be silent

Ives claims the slogan gave the trans movement “a message.” But Christians already have a message: truth. Hope. Redemption. The question is whether we are bold enough to speak it when the world shouts lies in capital letters across £75 shirts.

The designer may feel pride in the attention and funds raised, but this isn’t progress—it’s regression. It redefines truth by committee and compassion by delusion. And it demands that Christians bow to the golden calf of inclusivity.

In the face of such cultural pressure, we must not go silent. The gospel is counter-cultural, and now more than ever, we are called to speak—not just in church—but in fashion, in politics, and in the public square.

Read and pray

READ: Isaiah 1:23; Micah 6:8; Matt 23:23; Eph 5:11; Mark 12:30-31; John 14:15; Col 3:2.
PRAY: Pray for the UK. Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Government’s mask slips on grooming scandal

Uncategorised

Makeda

7 May 2025

Last week, Lucy Powell, Leader of the House of Commons, delivered what may go down as one of the most revealing moments of the party’s relationship with Britain’s most harrowing child abuse scandal.

On BBC Radio 4’s Any Questions, Ms. Powell dismissed concerns about the grooming gangs crisis as a “dog whistle” tactic, sneering at journalist Tim Montgomerie’s mention of a new documentary exposing the decades-long horrors faced by thousands of working-class girls.

Rather than acknowledge the pain or discuss accountability, Lucy reached for sarcasm: “Oh, we want to blow that little trumpet now, do we” and “Let’s get that dog whistle out, shall we?”

The backlash was instant – and deserved. Yet instead of sacking Ms. Powell, Prime Minister Keir Starmer backed her “apology,” claiming her words “did not reflect her true views.” An insult to national intelligence. Because the truth is – they did.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Sneers, deflections and familiar lines

The most damning part of Ms. Powell’s outburst wasn’t just its cruelty. It was how closely it echoed Mr. Starmer himself. Back in January, when the grooming gang scandal re-entered the public sphere, the Prime Minister accused opponents of wanting to “jump on a bandwagon of the far Right.”

One can’t help but note the symmetry: Powell with “dog whistle,” Starmer with “far-Right bandwagon.” Neither attempted to address the legitimate outrage of families or the documented failures of state institutions.

Instead, both insinuated that concern itself was suspect – perhaps even racist. This isn’t a one-off gaffe. It’s party orthodoxy.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The government’s pattern of contempt

Powell’s comments join a long line of dismissals from the government’s figures who can barely contain their irritation at having to discuss the rape gangs.

Jess Phillips, the government’s safeguarding minister, visibly scoffed when Conservative MP Katie Lam demanded answers on why promised judicial inquiries were downgraded to council-led probes – the very councils often complicit in previous cover-ups.

Phillips all but accused Lam of caring about “one kind of victim.” Yet it’s Labour that continues to minimise this particular scandal. Why? Because it’s politically inconvenient.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

The culture of cowardice and denial

It is not new for this government to shrink from the grooming gang crisis. As far back as 2003, Ann Cryer – a Labour MP herself – was labelled a racist for daring to speak up.

And in 2014, Alexis Jay’s report laid bare how authorities in Rotherham failed to act for fear of “being seen as racist.” That fear still rules today.

Not because it protects communities, but because it shields Labour from accusations it has come to dread more than failing the vulnerable: being seen as “right-wing.” What does that say about their moral compass?

A national scandal, a national betrayal

For over two decades, thousands of girls – overwhelmingly white, working class, many of them in ‘care’ – were groomed, raped, trafficked, and in some cases, murdered. And yet to this day, this government appears to treat the scandal as an electoral headache rather than a national tragedy. When Ms. Powell sneered last week, she wasn’t merely offering a personal misjudgement.

She was channelling the latent condescension of a political class that finds the victims inconvenient and the outrage embarrassing. The mask slipped, and behind it: indifference.

The price of political expediency

It is no surprise the party has resisted every call for a full statutory inquiry. Because such an inquiry would shine light not just on the criminals, but on the enablers: local councils, social workers, police departments – and yes, politicians.

In choosing to turn inward, to defend itself instead of seeking justice, Labour has placed its reputation above the lives of abused girls. Even now, the PM claims this isn’t the time for scrutiny. When, then, is the right time?

A reckoning still to come

The government can paper over this moment with mealy-mouthed apologies and hollow clarifications, but the public sees through it. The anger is not partisan.

It’s human. When safeguarding collapses and institutions cover their ears, citizens demand answers – not accusations of dog-whistling.

Lucy Powell’s sneer was a moment of clarity. Mr. Starmer’s defence of her, a moment of cowardice. Until the government confronts the moral decay that enabled these crimes to persist, it forfeits any rightful claim to the trust of the British people.

Rape-gang scandal: A failure of elite feminism →
Labour’s Winter Fuel Raid Costs Taxpayers £400m →

Read and pray

READ: Isaiah 1:23; Micah 6:8; Matt 23:23; Eph 5:11..
PRAY: Pray for the rape victims. Pray for the UK. Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

King and Queen attend Royal Maundy Service in Durham

Uncategorised

Makeda

17 April 2025

King Charles and Queen Camilla attends the Royal Maundy Service in Durham.

This afternoon, King Charles III and Queen Camilla visited Durham Cathedral to mark Maundy Thursday, a historic Christian tradition observed annually on the Thursday before Easter.

In a solemn service attended by clergy, veterans, and members of the public, the King distributed Maundy money, a ceremonial coins gifted to pensioners in recognition of their Christian service and community contribution.

The tradition dates back to the 13th century and is rooted in Jesus Christ’s act of humility when He washed the feet of His disciples before His crucifixion.

For believers, it serves as a reminder of the servant leadership Christ exemplified,a striking contrast to the self-serving posturing we often witness in today’s corridors of power.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

Faith or Another Media-friendly Moment?

While the King’s public show of allegiance to Christian values is welcomed, it raises serious questions: is it enough? The monarch’s role as the “Defender of the Faith” carries a weight that must go beyond ceremonial participation.

Is this annual pilgrimage to a northern cathedral a heartfelt affirmation of faith—or another media-friendly moment designed to deflect from the erosion of Christian freedoms under this government?

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Defender of Which Faith?

King Charles may bear the title “Defender of the Faith,” but in a nation increasingly hostile to Christianity, the title begs scrutiny. When Christian employees are disciplined for citing scripture, when schools cancel church services, and when government offices celebrate everything but Christianity—one has to ask what faith is he defending?

The monarchy, though largely symbolic, holds immense cultural sway. The King’s choice to visibly support other faiths is commendable in a diverse society. But equal visibility should not mean diluted allegiance to the Christian tradition that has shaped the moral and legal fabric of this country for centuries.

It is not enough to attend cathedral services or distribute Maundy money once a year. Defending the faith involves speaking up when it is being trampled upon, not just honouring it when convenient.

The King must decide whether he will truly stand for the Christian faith or simply be a ceremonial custodian of its relics.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

“Not My King”

Anti- monarch protesters chanting "No my King"! — Anti- monarch protesters chanting “No my King”!

As King Charles arrived in Durham for the Maundy Thursday service, he was met not only by cheering crowds and loyal subjects but also by vocal anti-monarch protesters chanting “Not My King.” The group, known as ” Republic” has been gaining traction, consistently challenging the legitimacy of the monarchy in a modern democracy.

Graham Smith, the leader of Republic, told Christian Voice: “We oppose the monarchy, and the ‘Not My King’ slogan comes from the fact that we don’t recognise him as the head of state.” He emphasised that their protest is not a personal attack on King Charles but a challenge to the institution itself.

“The monarchy is disrespectful to our institutions, it’s out of our constitution, and in a democracy we have to protest against things that are undemocratic.”

Mr. Smith acknowledged support from people of faith, despite his own non-religious stance. “There should be no king between Christians and God. God should be the only king,” he added.

Graham Smith- Leader of the anti-monarch group- Republic.

In a kingdom where the monarch is both head of state and nominal defender of the faith, that contradiction is becoming harder to ignore. This growing resistance exposes a deeper constitutional and spiritual tension: is the British monarchy a sacred symbol of continuity and faith, or an outdated emblem of inequality that stands in opposition to both democracy and biblical truth?

Inclusivity or Erasure?

Recently, a primary school in southern England made headlines for cancelling its annual Easter Bonnet Parade and accompanying church service. The reason? To be “more inclusive” and not offend non-Christian families. Instead, children were invited to participate in a generic spring-themed celebration stripped of any overt religious significance.

What was once a joyous, faith-rooted event has now been rebranded into a hollow performance of secular appeasement. Easter, the most significant event in the Christian calendar, reduced to nothing more than a seasonal aesthetic.

Schools, once partners in moral and spiritual development, now tiptoe around Christian expression in an attempt to avoid litigation or backlash.

What message does this send to children raised in the Christian faith? That their beliefs must be hidden to avoid offending others? That their celebrations are somehow less valid? Inclusivity should never come at the cost of erasing Christian identity from Britain’s public institutions.

Silenced for the Truth

Across the UK, Christians are being marginalised not just socially, but professionally. Individuals have lost jobs, been suspended, or faced public vilification for expressing views that align with Christian doctrine. Whether on social media, in private conversations, or even within religious institutions, speaking Biblical truth has become a dangerous act.

Take the case of a Christian teacher reprimanded for stating that marriage is between a man and a woman. Or the nurse suspended after offering prayer to a patient. These are not extreme fundamentalists, they are everyday professionals living out their faith quietly, yet now cast as pariahs by a society that preaches tolerance while practising selective outrage.

The government remains conspicuously silent as these injustices multiply. Laws purportedly designed to promote diversity are being wielded as tools to persecute Christian thought.

Christianity is not a hate movement, yet it is increasingly treated as such by those in positions of power. The silence from Downing Street and Whitehall is deafening, and speaks volumes about where this government truly stands.
The double standard is impossible to ignore. If a Muslim or Jewish teacher were suspended for their faith-based views, it would rightly cause uproar. But a Christian in the same situation is dismissed as outdated or intolerant.

The UK Government must remember that Christianity is not a fringe ideology. It is the historical and cultural backbone of this nation. Ignoring its erosion is not progressive governance—it is cultural vandalism.

Common Sense Restored – The Supreme Court’s Definition of a Woman

In a rare victory for biological reality and Christian ethics, the UK Supreme Court recently ruled in favour of defining a woman based on sex rather than self-identification. This decision brings much-needed clarity and puts to rest years of ideological confusion that has undermined legal protections for women and girls.

The ruling was a triumph for reason, science, and truth. It also vindicates those who have been relentlessly attacked for defending these truths—many of whom are Christians. Individuals who lost jobs, were de-platformed, or branded bigots for refusing to bow to a subjective, fluid definition of womanhood can finally breathe a sigh of relief.

This victory, however, did not come from the government, but from the judiciary. Politicians, for the most part, lacked the courage to take a stand. It was left to ordinary citizens, campaigners, and principled judges to do what Parliament would not.

Christians can find encouragement in this ruling, but it must not breed complacency. We must continue to engage, speak truth, and defend the dignity of all as image-bearers of God—male and female, made with intention and distinction.

A Call to Courage

The King and Queen leaving the Cathedral.

Britain’s Christians are not asking for privilege. They are asking for the right to exist freely, to speak truth, and to live out their beliefs without fear of penalty. This is a basic freedom, enshrined in law, yet increasingly violated by cultural cowardice and governmental neglect.

Now is the time for the Church to speak boldly and for Christian politicians, journalists, and everyday citizens to push back against the soft persecution unfolding before us. We must not be lulled into silence by token gestures or ceremonial affirmations.

As we reflect on the King’s visit to Durham Cathedral, let us be reminded of Christ’s example. He did not retreat from confrontation, nor did he flatter the powerful. He spoke truth with compassion and clarity.

It is time for Britain’s Christian community to do the same. Our silence will not shield us. Only courageous, unwavering faith will preserve the truth for future generations.

Read and pray

READ:Gen 1:27-28; Exod 18:21; Lev 19:03 ;1Sam 08:03; Psa 144:12 ; Prov 4;7; Josh 1:9 Isa 03:04-05; Matt 15:04a; 1 Peter 5:2-3; 1 Tim 3:1-7; Philip 2:3-4

PRAY:Pray for our education system. Pray for our children. Pray for our God-fearing leaders.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Watchdog: Girls in care should share rooms with boys who ID as female

Uncategorised

Makeda

17 March 2025

Scotland’s care system, tasked with safeguarding vulnerable children, has taken a deeply unsettling turn. The Care Inspectorate, a government watchdog, has decreed that Girls in care should share a bedroom with boys who ‘self-identify’ as the opposite gender, according to the Daily Mail.

This policy, issued in May 2024, means that young girls could now be compelled to share rooms with males who “identify as female”, disregarding basic safeguarding principles.

This pronouncement aligns with controversial Scottish Government guidance, which insists that “transgender-identifying youths” should never be required to use facilities corresponding to their biological sex.

Despite mounting concerns from child welfare experts, the state appears determined to prioritise ideological conformity over the safety and well-being of those in its care.

Given that a significant proportion of children in care have experienced past trauma, forcing them into potentially distressing situations raises serious ethical and legal concerns.

Stop Transgenderism Now! →

Ignoring the reality of childhood trauma

The consequences of this policy become even more alarming when viewed in the context of Scotland’s care demographics.

A University of Stirling study from 2019 found that most children placed into care had suffered abuse, neglect, or other forms of maltreatment.

These are young people who desperately need stability, not further uncertainty imposed by political posturing.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

The Cass review

The Cass Review, published in 2023, revealed a striking overlap between children in care and those identifying as transgender.

Many of these youngsters have endured adverse childhood experiences, making them particularly vulnerable to external influences and social contagion.

Yet rather than providing robust psychological support, the state appears intent on reinforcing an ideology that fails to acknowledge the complexities of their distress.

The latest directive not only overlooks these realities but also places emotionally fragile children in situations where their personal boundaries may be compromised.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Repeating past mistakes at the expense of safety

This is not the first time Scottish authorities have been accused of jeopardising safeguarding standards.In 2021, the Scottish Government faced backlash over its school guidance, which permitted children to socially transition without parental consent.

That policy was criticised for undermining parental rights and encouraging secrecy in critical areas of child development.

In a similar vein, the new care home directive disregards the legitimate concerns of professionals and parents alike. The failure to conduct a rigorous risk assessment before implementing such a radical change demonstrates a disturbing pattern: ideology is placed above evidence-based policy.

One need only look at past safeguarding failures—such as the mishandling of grooming gang investigations in various parts of the UK—to understand the dangers of ignoring warning signs.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Dismissing the concerns of experts

Child welfare specialists and legal experts have raised the alarm, yet their warnings have been brushed aside. Helen Joyce, Director of Advocacy at Sex Matters, described the policy as ‘a terrifying failure’ of the state’s obligation to protect the vulnerable.

Past experiences have shown that disregarding expert advice leads to tragic consequences. The Scottish Government’s dismissal of biological reality mirrors the failures seen in the Tavistock scandal, where children were rushed into irreversible medical interventions due to political pressure rather than clinical judgement.

The refusal to acknowledge risks is not just negligent—it is an active betrayal of the duty of care owed to those who rely on the state for protection.

A system in crisis

The most troubling aspect of this policy is what it reveals about the state of governance in Scotland. The agencies entrusted with child protection have capitulated to an activist agenda, forsaking their core duty to act in the best interests of those in their care. Instead of adopting a cautious, evidence-based approach, they have embraced a doctrine that prioritises identity politics over safeguarding.

If the government is unwilling to acknowledge the dangers posed by this directive, public confidence in Scotland’s child protection system will continue to erode.

The prioritisation of ideological compliance over child safety should be a national scandal—yet those responsible remain unchallenged within the corridors of power.

Read and pray

READ:Gen 1:27-28; Judg 2:10; Ezek 16:49; Prov 14:34; Psa 127:3-5; Matt 4:17, 10:7; Mark 10:6-8; Luke 17:28-29; Rom 1:25-27; Col 3:5; 1 John 4:19 Rom 1:25-27..

PRAY:Pray for children in care in Scotland. Pray for our God-fearing leaders.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Woke Studies: A new low for Academia

Uncategorised

Makeda

14 March 2025

At a time when universities should be focusing on rigorous research and innovation, taxpayers’ money is instead being funnelled into “woke studies’”of questionable value.

Investigations reveal that funding bodies, including UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), have approved grants for projects exploring subjects such as ‘queer ecology’ and TikTok dance trends. These studies do little to advance scientific or societal progress, yet they continue to drain the public purse at an alarming rate.

The funding of these projects is not just an academic indulgence but a misuse of taxpayer resources.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

‘Queering Climate Change,’?

An example of this is a research project titled “Queering Climate Change,’’ which received substantial government funding. While climate research is undoubtedly important, diverting funds towards such a niche ideological angle is symptomatic of the wider academic rot.

Instead of focusing on sustainable energy solutions or policy-driven environmental change, researchers are prioritising intersectionality and identity politics.

The question taxpayers should be asking is simple: what real-world problems do these projects solve? The answer, in most cases, is none.

The continued financing of such endeavours highlights a government more concerned with appeasing activist academics than delivering value for money.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

The UKRI: A bureaucratic behemoth

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) is the main body responsible for disbursing research funds, yet its structure is riddled with inefficiencies and elite self-interest.

While this setup was ostensibly designed to encourage “academic diversity”, in reality, it has facilitated an opaque and wasteful allocation of resources.

The individuals at the helm of UKRI are not chosen through a democratic or transparent process. They are appointed by the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, ensuring that those with the ‘right’ connections continue to benefit from government largesse. The councils themselves function as echo chambers, reinforcing ideological homogeneity rather than promoting genuine intellectual debate.

UKRI decisions increasingly reflect the interests of academic elites rather than the needs of the wider public, ensuring that research grants remain the preserve of those who conform to prevailing narratives.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Who are these people?

With individuals such as The Baroness Bull CBE and Professor Dame Ottoline Leyser at the helm, it is evident that UKRI is deeply embedded within the upper echelons of Britain’s ruling elite.

These individuals are appointed rather than elected, raising serious concerns about accountability. Despite controlling vast sums of public money, there is little transparency in how they make decisions or who truly benefits from their funding choices.

The composition of the UKRI board exemplifies the broader issue of entrenched privilege within Britain’s research sector. Taxpayers deserve a system where funding decisions are based on merit and national interest, rather than the whims of a self-selecting clique of establishment figures.

Nine Councils: A jobs programme for the elite

UKRI’s sprawling bureaucracy is divided into nine separate research councils, each of which operates with little oversight. These councils, which include bodies such as the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the Economic and Social Research Council, function less as centres of academic excellence and more as sinecures for well-connected academics.

The councils claim to support research that benefits society, yet much of their funding is directed towards projects with little practical value. Grants have been awarded for studies into ‘decolonising heritage’ and ‘non-binary storytelling,’ while vital areas such as medical research and technological innovation receive comparatively less support.

At a time when public services are under strain, it is indefensible that taxpayers are subsidising cushy jobs for academics whose work has no meaningful impact.

Public services cut while professors reap the rewards

While ordinary Britons are seeing their benefits slashed and public services cut to the bone, UKRI continues to shower money on well-heeled professors and career bureaucrats. The organisation’s budget, running into the billions, represents a grotesque misallocation of resources during Britain’s most vulnerable time.

Rachel from Complaints might be struggling to get her benefits sorted, but in the rarefied world of academia, there is no shortage of funding for ideological pet projects.

It is a damning indictment of the government’s priorities that while pensioners and the working poor are facing financial hardship, the academic elite are thriving at taxpayer expense.

Sir Keir Starmer expanding Quango state

Sir Keir Starmer’s administration has shown no signs of reversing this trend. If anything, his government has continued the tradition of expanding the quango state, creating more taxpayer-funded institutions to be filled with the same establishment figures who have presided over years of waste and incompetence.

Since taking office, Sir Starmer has set up new advisory panels, research bodies, and task forces, all of which follow the same pattern: well-paid positions for those with the right political and ideological credentials, but little real benefit for the public.

These quangos act as a parallel government, unaccountable yet deeply influential, shaping policies and funding decisions behind closed doors.

If Britain is to regain control over its research priorities, it must start by dismantling the bloated bureaucracy that allows these wasteful expenditures to persist.

Pray

PRAY: for the UK. Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Use this link to the UK Parliament website to email your MP →

Let your MP know the value of parliamentary prayers in safeguarding liberty and justice and ask your MP to let you know if he or she supports our United Kingdom Christian heritage.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Trans doctors can use lavatories of their choice,says hospital trust

Uncategorised

Makeda

12 March 2025

PrincessRoyal14 — Pro-Transgender 'Pride Flag' painted on a walkway at NHS Princess Royal Hospital, Orpington, England.

A London hospital trust has defied the UK’s Health Secretary by letting trans staff choose their own lavatories and changing rooms, according to the Telegraph.

Guy’s and St Thomas’ trust’s new transgender equality policy tells all staff they must refer to everyone with the pronoun of their choice, even if they do not believe in gender ideology.

Patients, many of whom are vulnerable, are now at risk of being placed in intimate situations with individuals of the opposite sex, without their knowledge or consent.

This reckless decision directly challenges the efforts of Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who is considering implementing new NHS guidance to prevent exactly this kind of overreach.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Workplace Coercion

This enforced speech is not only an insult to professional autonomy but also creates an environment of coercion where medical professionals risk disciplinary action for stating biological facts.

The Trust explicitly instructs managers to conceal the trans status of doctors and nurses from patients. This means that a female patient requesting a woman for intimate care could be met with a biological man who identifies as female, without being informed.

The ethical violations are staggering—deception is being institutionalised under the guise of inclusivity, disregarding patient rights entirely.

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

The rising backlash against NHS insanity

The lunacy of this policy becomes even clearer when viewed against the backdrop of recent legal battles. In Darlington, eight nurses took legal action after being forced to share changing facilities with a biological male who identified as female.

These professionals, dedicated to patient care, were vilified simply for raising legitimate concerns about privacy and dignity. Rather than recognising the obvious risks, NHS bureaucrats doubled down, defending policies that erode women’s rights and workplace protections.

A similar case is unfolding in Scotland, where NHS Fife is embroiled in a legal dispute after nurse Sandie Peggie was compelled to share a changing room with a “transwoman”.

The message from NHS leadership is clear: women’s concerns are irrelevant, their discomfort is invalid, and their rights are negotiable when placed against the demands of gender ideology. This is not inclusion—it is state-mandated erasure of sex-based protections.

The leadership at Guy’s and St Thomas’ is now on a collision course with reality. While other NHS trusts face legal action for similar policies, this institution is proudly enacting a directive that contradicts fundamental principles of medical ethics.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Institutionalising a delusion

The absurdity does not end with bathroom policies. The Trust’s guidance embraces the legally unrecognised concept of “non-binary” identities, mandating staff training on “gender non-conforming identities” as if these terms had scientific legitimacy.

More disturbingly, the Trust has decided to collect data based on self-declared gender identity while refusing to record biological sex.

In a medical setting, where accurate records can mean the difference between life and death, prioritising ideological compliance over factual data is unforgivable.

Moreover, the policy states that an individual’s pronouns can change at any time and that colleagues must comply instantly. This reduces professional interactions to a linguistic minefield, where one misstep could result in disciplinary action. Medical staff, already burdened with immense responsibilities, are now expected to memorise fluctuating identities in order to avoid accusations of “transphobia.”

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

NHS betrays women’s rights

This policy signals a fundamental betrayal of women in the NHS. Sex-based protections, once enshrined under the Equality Act, are being eroded to accommodate an ideological movement that denies biological reality. By omitting “sex” from its list of protected characteristics, the Trust has made a chilling declaration: women’s rights are expendable.

This is not the first time the NHS has been complicit in such an agenda. Previously, female patients have been forced to share hospital wards with biological men, with some being threatened with removal if they dared to object. When complaints were raised about male-bodied individuals being placed in female-only spaces, administrators dismissed the concerns as bigotry. The NHS is systematically dismantling women’s rights, replacing them with policies that prioritise feelings over facts.

The consequences will not be theoretical. Patients who require single-sex care due to religious or personal reasons will now find themselves at the mercy of staff who are forbidden from disclosing the truth. Women in distress, already vulnerable in medical settings, will have their autonomy stripped away by an institution that once prided itself on patient dignity and informed consent.

Reckless leadership, unavoidable consequences

When women are silenced, when professionals are forced to lie, when medical records are falsified, the consequences are measured not in social justice points, but in lives harmed.

The NHS was founded on principles of care, ethics, and scientific integrity. This latest ideological capitulation reveals how far it has strayed from those foundations.

Public outrage is growing, and with good reason. Patients, staff, and advocacy groups are mobilising against these policies, demanding that reason prevails over ideology.

As legal battles unfold, it is only a matter of time before this reckless experiment collapses under its own contradictions.

Read and pray

READ:Gen 1:27-28; Lev 18:22; Judg 2:10; Ezek 16:49; Prov 14:34; Psa 127:3-5; Matt 4:17, 10:7; Mark 10:6-8; Luke 17:28-29; Rom 1:25-27; 1 Cor 11:3; Gal 5:19; Col 3:5; 1 John 4:19 Rom 1:25-27.

PRAY:Pray for the NHS. Pray for our God-fearing leaders.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

GCHQ abandons Stonewall

Uncategorised

Makeda

4 March 2025

The UK Government’s Communications Head Quarters (GCHQ), has quietly distanced itself from Stonewall’s diversity scheme, according to the Telegraph. A reference to the agency’s status as a “Stonewall Diversity Champion” on its careers website was removed after GCHQ was contacted by the media. The removal of its “Diversity Champion” status from official careers pages signals a broader shift within UK institutions, as state bodies re-evaluate their association with controversial activist groups. This calculated retreat aligns with the growing resistance against Stonewall’s radical agenda, which has alienated even its former allies. Stop Transgenderism Now! →

GCHQ’s retreat

The intelligence community’s retreat coincides with Stonewall’s financial troubles, exacerbated by reduced US funding. President Donald Trump’s pledge to dismantle the “deep state” and cut wasteful government spending has had direct repercussions, with Stonewall losing one of its most significant financial backers: the US State Department. Without this lifeline, “the charity” now scrambles to secure alternative revenue streams. Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

The UK’s hypocrisy on foreign influence

The UK government relentlessly criticises foreign meddling yet shamelessly injects its ideological agenda into other nations. Through the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), Britain has committed a staggering £40 million to advance “LGBT+ rights globally.” This interventionist policy undermines national sovereignty, imposing Western values on societies with different cultural and religious foundations. Meanwhile, the same government claims outrage when external forces influence its internal affairs. If Britain truly valued non-interference, it would abandon its ideological exportation and focus on its own domestic challenges. Support Christian Voice →

Stonewall’s waning influence

Once a dominant force claiming to shape workplace policies across Britain, Stonewall’s influence has sharply declined. The pandemic saw an exodus of government departments and corporations withdrawing from its diversity program, disillusioned by its increasing extremism. GCHQ is merely the latest in a growing list of institutions that have opted to cut ties, recognising the reputational and financial risks of continued affiliation. Even Britain’s intelligence services, long known for their embrace of progressive policies, have turned away. MI5, MI6, and GCHQ, all of which previously held high rankings in Stonewall’s employer index, have faded from the list in recent years. Institutions are no longer willing to pay exorbitant sums for ideological compliance, particularly when doing so undermines operational integrity and public trust. Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The erosion of ‘five eyes’ unity

Tensions within the “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance have surfaced, exposing fractures among historically close allies. Meanwhile, in the US, Trump’s allies propose expelling Canada from the alliance, citing policy disagreements and economic disputes. These internal divisions highlight the fragility of Western intelligence partnerships once considered unshakable. As ideological rifts deepen, member nations are prioritising national interests over performative commitments to activism. Rather than clinging to outdated woke commitments, Western nations must address the growing threats of economic instability, cybersecurity, and geopolitical competition.

Transgender clinics close in India after Trump cuts USAID

India's first transgender clinics close after USAID freeze — India’s first transgender clinics close after USAID freeze

Several so-called “transgender healthcare” clinics in India have shut down, thanks to the Trump administration’s decisive action against USAID funding. According to LifeSIteNews, three Mitr Clinics, which specialised in pushing dangerous medical interventions on vulnerable individuals, have been forced to close their doors. These clinics, established in collaboration with Johns Hopkins University, were a product of ideological imperialism disguised as healthcare. With U.S. taxpayer dollars no longer bankrolling gender experimentation abroad, these facilities have collapsed under their own unsustainable model. The Mitr Clinics, first introduced in Hyderabad in 2021, prioritised hormone treatments over real medical care. Their closure is a victory for sanity and a rejection of the reckless Western export of gender ideology. While Reuters laments the loss of “services” for 5,000 so-called transgender patients, what has actually ended is a pipeline of medical malpractice that treated life-altering hormones as a routine prescription.

Read and Pray

Gen 1:27; Exod 18:20; Lev 19:35-37; Deut 18:9-13; Prov 14:34, 28:07; Isa 29:16; Mark 8:38; Col 1:15-17; Rev 19:15-16. PRAY: for the UK government. Pray for God fearing leaders. Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

New health minister believes people can identify as llamas

Uncategorised

Makeda

13 February 2025

Health Minister Rt Hon Ashley Dalton MP.

Is the new minister of health a llama? The Government have appointed a woman to the post who believes people should be allowed to self-identify as llamas.

Ashley Dalton’ appointment was announced after offensive messages that emerged as part of a widening WhatsApp scandal, replacing sacked MP Andrew Gwynne.

In the hours following the announcement of Ms. Dalton’s new role, her views on self-identification resurfaced, with tweets dating back to 2016 revealing her belief that people should be allowed to identify as llamas.

A health minister who denies biology

Ashley Dalton, UK Health minister — Llama

The appointment of Ashley Dalton as the new junior health minister exposes the deep grip of trans extremism within the Labour Party. Her radical stance on gender and species identification raises serious concerns about the party’s commitment to scientific truth and rational policy-making.

In a now-infamous 2016 Twitter now X exchange, Ms. Dalton insisted that those who identify as llamas should be treated with “respect and dignity.” While respect is fundamental, equating self-identification with biological reality is a step into dangerous absurdity.

The Bible warns against such folly in Romans 1:22: Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
The government’’s continued embrace of such ideology demonstrates not wisdom, but a reckless abandonment of common sense.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Wes Streeting’s role in gender chaos

The responsibility for Dalton’s appointment does not rest solely with Keir Starmer. As the shadow health secretary turned Secretary of State for Health, Wes Streeting has been a leading advocate for the ideological capture of public health policies.

His complicity in hiring a minister who disregards biological sex raises serious concerns about his judgment. Ashley Dalton was previously his Parliamentary Private Secretary, his personal aide in the Commons.

Mr. Streeting, who has previously declared his full support for trans activism, has helped pave the way for individuals like Dalton to gain political influence. Proverbs 29:12 warns: If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked.
By enabling such extremism, Streeting is actively undermining the credibility of health policy in the UK.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The attack on single-sex spaces

The new Health Secretary’s radical views extend beyond gender identity and into policy changes that threaten women’s safety. She has openly advocated for the complete abolition of single-sex bathrooms and changing rooms, arguing that self-identification should override all considerations of privacy and security.

This mirrors the ideological push that has led to male offenders being housed in women’s prisons—a policy endorsed by Labour figures such as Lisa Nandy. Such reckless policies contradict God’s clear design for biological distinction, as outlined in Genesis 1:27: So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Labour’s agenda seeks to erase this distinction, with dangerous consequences for women’s rights and public safety.

The dangers of denying reality

This government’s flirtation with trans extremism is not merely an abstract debate; it has real-world implications. When a government official rejects biological facts, they risk shaping policies that are detached from reality, ultimately harming the very people they claim to support.

The idea that someone can change their species is a stark reminder of where unchecked ideological pandering can lead.

2 Timothy 4:3 warns of a time when people “will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears.”

This government has surrounded itself with individuals who refuse to acknowledge basic truths, ensuring that their policies will be driven not by facts, but by ideological fanaticism.

A party that cannot be trusted

All Labour’s attempts to present itself as a moderate party on the “trans” debate, Dalton’s appointment reveals the opposite. This is the same party whose leader, Keir Starmer, once speculated that one in 1,000 women might have a penis. It is the same party that stood by Dawn Butler when she declared that children are born without a sex.

The Bible speaks against leaders who mislead their people in Isaiah 3:12: As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
This government’s leadership is actively leading the country down a path of confusion and instability.

The need for truth and accountability

As Ms. Dalton takes up her role in the Department of Health, the public must demand accountability. The UK cannot afford health policies dictated by individuals who reject biological reality. Instead, we need leaders grounded in truth, who prioritise evidence-based policies over ideological delusions.

John 8:32 says; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
The first step toward restoring sanity in public policy is to challenge and reject the radical extremism that has taken hold of the country.
The British public must not remain silent while their government abandons reality for the sake of ideological conformity.

Pray

PRAY: for the UK. Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Why the NHS is a law unto itself

Uncategorised

Stephen

11 February 2025

Health Secretary the Rt Hon. Wes Streeting MP has attacked the NHS over its diversity schemes.

He said a member of staff boasted of her ‘anti-whiteness’ as part of what he called a ‘daft’ Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) agenda. She’s Dr Florencia Gysbertha, a psychologist, who, when she moonlights, charges £100 per session for her ‘counselling’.

“The ideological hobby horses need to go,” the Health Secretary continued. As indeed have all Dr Florencia’s posts on LinkedIn.

Not that Mr Streeting is against EDI, which in fact promotes not equality but division, not diversity but conformity and not inclusion but exclusion of Christians and, frankly, anyone with a brain. He merely says the “misguided” agendas are setting back EDI’s ungodly cause.

Support Christian Voice →

35 EDI roles have been advertised since Sir Keir Starmer’s Government took power. That is one every week. Some posts offered salaries of more than £80,000.

Between them, these unbiblical roles paid out more than £750,000, which could have funded more than 600 new hospital beds.

Previous Health Secretary Steve Barclay MP carried out the analysis. During his time as Tory health secretary he ordered NHS chiefs not to create specialist inclusion roles. He had no better results than will Mr Streeting. They need to repent and put God first:

Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

Cass report ignored

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust posted an advert for an EDI geek on the very same day that the Wes made his speech.

It has “pay enhancements”, an “excellent pension” and the ability to work from home, you’ll be glad to know. Indeed, NHS Trusts have even ignored the Cass Report into the shameful abuse carried out by gender outfits like the Tavistock.

That has now closed, only for NHS trusts to be opening six new Son of Tavistock children’s gender clinics by 2026. Figures released just yesterday have revealed that the mutilation of ‘top surgery’, where evil surgeons remove young women’s healthy breasts, is currently being inflicted by NHS Trusts on one thousand young women a year.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Watch the video here!

“NHS trusts self-governing”

Why is such monstrosity taking place? Why do these NHS Trusts appear to act as if they are a law unto themselves? It’s because they are.

The National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 made NHS trusts self-governing, responsible only to themselves. The Health and Social Care Act 2012 set up the NHS Commissioning Board which was then renamed NHS England (qv).

At a time of shocking depravity in ancient Israel, the very last verse of the Bible’s book of Judges complains:
Judges 21:25 In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did what was right in his own eyes.
Likewise, there is no king, in the shape of His Majesty’s Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the quangocracy of NHS Trusts.

The woke management

Every one of them does what is right in its woke management’s own eyes. It’s complete anarchy, and it goes without saying the Bible opposes that and stands for a rule of law, with rulers accountable to God and to the people.

The Bible says,
Exod 19:8 And all the people answered together, and said, All that the LORD hath spoken we will do. And Moses returned the words of the people unto the LORD.

Rom 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. … 4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good.
The Centurion commended for his faith by our Lord told him:

Luke 7:8 For I also am a man set under authority, having under me soldiers, and I say unto one, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.

Leadership and authority

When you are under authority, you have authority. Under the UK’s Christian constitution, King Charles rules under the authority of the King of kings, the Lord Jesus Christ. So the king has the Lord’s authority and the king’s ministers exercise that authority and are responsible to the king, to God and to the people for carrying it out.

But when they set up quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisations, QUANGOs, these are under no authority and ministers are able to evade responsibility for their actions. The Taxpayers’ Alliance listed nine hundred and fifty seven quangos in twenty-ten. Even then they employed 700,000 staff and cost the taxpayer, in one way or another, over £120 billion.

In Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, ministers appoint the directors of NHS trusts. But the king’s Health Secretary can’t appoint the members of NHS Trusts in England. That is in the gift of another quango, the NHS Trust Development Authority, which is part of yet another, NHS Improvement called NHS England.

Who appoints the directors of NHS England?

It’s a complete mystery. It’s thoroughly opache. All the Government will say is that such and such a person ‘has been appointed.’ By whom? Who knows?

Ministers like being able to say ‘it’s not my fault’. But in the case of the English NHS, the woke mud from its unbiblical absurdities is now sticking to Secretaries of State. Hence their bluster. But they are impotent.

They have no power over NHS Trusts. The only way they will regain it is by repealing most of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 and the 2012 Act and bringing all NHS Trusts back under the king’s control, as biblical rules of order demand. When Wes Streeting or Keir Starmer says they will do that, and scrap EDI, you will know they are serious.

Read and Pray

Matt 4:17, 10:7; Mark 6:12; Romans 1:25-27; 1 Cor 11:3; Gal 5:19; Col 3:5; 1 John 4:19
PRAY: for the NHS. Pray for the UK. Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Man arrested for burning the Quran

Uncategorised

Stephen

7 February 2025

A man has been arrested for burning pages of the Quran, according to the Daily Mail.

The protest came just two days after Salwan Momika, a Swedish anti-Islam activist, was shot dead near Stockholm after he burned the Quran there in 2023.

The man in Manchester carried out his desecration of the book the Mohamedans regard as ‘noble’ next to the city’s Glade of Light Memorial which commemorates the victims of the 2017 Manchester Arena Muslim terrorist attack.

He also displayed an Israeli flag. The man was wearing a kippur, so he was Jewish. This was not a detail reported by the Mail.

A second man, apparently Muslim, tried to intervene, but failed to stop the protest.

‘This is what I think of your holy book’, yelled the protester, as page after burning page tumbled to the ground. The burning was live-streamed on social media by a number of people simultaneously.

Said video came to the attention of Greater Manchester Police. The man, 47, was subsequently arrested on suspicion of a ‘racially aggravated public order offence’. Greater Manchester Police Assistant Chief Constable Stephanie Parker told GB News: ‘We understand the deep concern this will cause within some of our diverse communities and are aware of a live video circulating.

‘We made a swift arrest at the time and recognise the right people have for freedom of expression, but when this crosses into intimidation to cause harm or distress we will always look to take action when it is reported to us.’

Support Christian Voice →

The problem

Firstly, let me make clear I am of course far too polite to insult someone’s religious faith in that way, or indeed at all. For clarity, let me also explain the laws of England and Wales only have one blasphemy law, in Section 74 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 . It’s called ‘Hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation.’

Section 79 of the same Act, since you ask, abolished the Christian common law offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel, so Christians now have to take to the streets when our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, is insulted or blasphemed.

Which is what Christian Voice did in 2006 over Jerry Springer the Opera , to great effect, by the grace of God, also in St Andrews over the play Corpus Christi, against the Sunday Mirror, and against the South Wales Echo.

There is no Islamic blasphemy law in any United Kingdom legal jurisdiction. So there are several troubling things about the Manchester Police response.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Firstly,the arrest on suspicion of a ‘racially aggravated public order offence’. You are probably way ahead of me. Islam is a religion, not a race. So an action against the Mohamedan heresy cannot be ‘racially aggravated’.

Secondly, the Stephanie says ‘We made a swift arrest at the time’. No you didn’t. Your boys in blue were not even there. You only sprung into action after the video came to your attention.

She says they ‘recognise the right people have for freedom of expression’. That’s nice, she should stop there, but you just know there is a ‘but’ coming. ‘but when this crosses into intimidation to cause harm or distress we will always look to take action when it is reported to us.’

The guy intimidated no-one. And by the way, I was not aware the followers of Mohamed were that easily intimidated. Their recent anti-Semitic marches, their routine violence at Speakers Corner, shows them anything but. Quick to take brutal offence, more like.

Lastly, her reference to ‘diverse communities’ gives the game away. There is a spiritual dimension here. If I may mix religious metaphors, the Jewish guy has offended the establishment’s sacred cow of multiculturalism.

Prefer to watch my analysis? here is the video.

A bit like some of the Southport protesters, asking, in colourful language, what place ‘Allah’ has in our land, the protester says the religion of Islam is not part of our way of life. He has done that in a way which carries great personal risk. The police should be protecting him, not arresting him, frankly.

But he has challenged an elite idea. And the sentences handed down in last summer’s display of two-tier justice show how the British state deals with that kind of insurrection.

Just for clarity, It is Jesus Christ who is Lord and King over our land, not multiculturalism, nor Islam.

As it is written:

Php 2:10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow.

Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.

Proclamation of that constitutional truth by our elites is the only way they will secure peace and stability in our land. Pray for them.

Read and Pray

PRAY: Pray for the UK. Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Rape-gang scandal: A failure of elite feminism

Uncategorised

Makeda

8 January 2025

Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal

The grooming-gang scandal, involving the systematic rape and sexual abuse of predominantly white working-class girls by groups of mostly Pakistani-heritage men, has long been a national disgrace.

The scandal is back in the headlines after Elon Musk accused Sir Keir Starmer and minister Jess Phillips of being “complicit” in the failure of authorities to protect victims and prosecute abusers while the PM was director of public prosecutions from 2008-2013.
For decades, this issue has simmered beneath the surface, ignored or downplayed by many who ought to have been its fiercest advocates for justice. Elite feminists, often seen as the guardians of women’s rights, have instead remained conspicuously silent.

The grooming gangs scandal?

The grooming gangs scandal in England, first highlighted in a 2011 Times of London investigation, revealed the sexual exploitation of girls by criminal gangs, primarily in northern towns, from 1997 onwards. Chief Inspector Alan Edwards noted that fear of addressing the perpetrators’ ethnicity hindered action.

A 2014 official report on Rotherham exposed that at least 1,400 children, some as young as 11, were groomed for sexual exploitation between 1997 and 2013. Authorities often ignored victims and their families, with some police officers dismissing the abuse as a “lifestyle choice.”

The abuse typically involved men courting girls in public places, introducing them to alcohol and drugs, and pressuring them into sexual acts with others. Often, the girl would think she had a genuine boyfriend, before finding out the stark reality of gang-rape. The scandal was particularly sensitive due to the racial disparity between the mostly white victims and the perpetrators, who were often of Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or Afghan heritage. Subsequent prosecutions led to long prison sentences for some offenders.

The Price of Neglect

The #MeToo movement, while drawing attention to workplace harassment and misconduct, has glaringly failed to address the horrors faced by vulnerable girls in local authority care. This neglect has left a vacuum in which justice remains elusive for countless victims.

The Labour Party’s Jess Phillips, a self-styled champion of women and girls, exemplifies this failure. As the government’s safeguarding minister, Phillips’s refusal to endorse Oldham Council’s call for a national inquiry into grooming gangs reveals a troubling double standard.

Her silence on this issue contrasts starkly with her otherwise vocal advocacy for women’s rights, exposing a hypocrisy that has not gone unnoticed. This betrayal stings all the more because it comes from someone who presents herself as a no-nonsense feminist—a facade that crumbles when faced with the politically inconvenient truth of grooming gangs.

The Bible says: Proverbs 31:8-9 Open thy mouth for the dumb in the cause of all such as are appointed to destruction…Open thy mouth, judge righteously, and plead the cause of the poor and needy.
Support Christian Voice →

Jess Phillips: Feminism’s Hollow Champion

Labour’s Jess Phillips, safeguarding minister and self-proclaimed straight-talker, exemplifies the failure of establishment feminism to address the grooming-gang crisis. Her rejection of Oldham Council’s request for a national inquiry into the town’s child sexual exploitation scandal is an insult to survivors. Ms. Phillips, who prides herself on being a voice for women, has instead chosen to ignore the cries of abused girls. Her selective activism speaks volumes about the priorities of Britain’s feminist elite.

Ms Phillips is not alone in her dereliction of duty. Groups like the defunct Women’s Equality Party and institutions like the Fawcett Society have similarly diverted their energies elsewhere. Their focus on abstract issues like feminist AI may score them progressive points, but it does nothing to address the real, immediate suffering of rape survivors. This willful neglect lays bare the hollowness of a movement more invested in virtue signalling than in tangible justice.

Labour’s Leadership Vacuum

Labour’s mishandling of the grooming-gang scandal goes beyond Phillips. The party’s broader leadership has failed to champion the interests of the most vulnerable, instead choosing to prioritise policies like cutting winter fuel payments. This decision, which disproportionately affects elderly pensioners, highlights a disturbing trend: Labour’s willingness to sacrifice the needs of the powerless for the sake of political expediency.

By targeting pensioners while neglecting the victims of grooming gangs, Labour demonstrates a troubling inability to address issues that demand moral courage and leadership.

The surge in pension credit claims following the winter fuel cuts further underscores Labour’s miscalculations. The savings touted by the Treasury have been eroded by increased welfare costs, revealing the short-sightedness of these measures.
Meanwhile, the party’s inaction on grooming gangs suggests an unwillingness to engage with complex and politically sensitive issues. Labour’s silence is a betrayal of the very communities it claims to represent.

The Bible says: Matthew 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The #MeToo Hypocrisy

The global #MeToo movement, hailed as a watershed moment for women’s rights, has utterly failed to address the grooming-gang scandal. While it mobilised millions to share their experiences of harassment, it largely ignored the systemic abuse of working-class girls in Britain. Instead, it focused on high-profile cases, trivial incidents, and celebrity scandals. A fleeting kiss or an awkward date sparked international outrage, yet the prolonged suffering of girls in care homes and council estates was met with indifference.

The hypocrisy is staggering. Had even a fraction of the energy devoted to #MeToo been channelled into exposing and tackling grooming gangs, lives could have been saved, and justice served. Instead, the movement revealed its true colours: a platform for elite women to air grievances, not a genuine effort to combat all forms of misogyny.

As the Bible says: James 2:15-16 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food…And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?

The Price of Speaking Out

For the few brave women who dared to speak out against grooming gangs, the backlash was swift and unforgiving. Labour’s Ann Cryer, Sarah Champion, journalist Julie Bindel, and former detective Margaret Oliver all faced vilification for their efforts. Branded racists, ostracised by their peers, and even forced out of their jobs, these women endured relentless attacks for daring to expose the truth. Their treatment by the feminist establishment is nothing short of disgraceful.

Instead of rallying around these whistleblowers, mainstream feminists chose to demonise them. Organisations like End Violence Against Women accused them of fuelling hatred, while academics dismissed their concerns as pandering to far-right narratives. This toxic atmosphere has silenced countless others who might have spoken out. The fear of being labelled a bigot has become a powerful tool for suppressing uncomfortable truths, leaving vulnerable girls to suffer in silence.

Sacrificed on the altar of Multiculturalism

It is not difficult to conclude these girls have been sacrificed on the altar of multiculturalism. The whistle-blowers were blasphemers against the orthodoxy.

Even now, politicians are unwilling to name the prime cause of the scandal. Kemi Badenoch pretended Pakistani ‘village’ attitudes were to blame. That is nonsense. Most Pakistani immigrants are from families who could afford, not just the air fare, but the visa as well. Even illegal immigrants crossing the channel have been able to pay thousands of dollars to people smugglers.

The root cause is not ‘the village’, it’s Islam. These were, and are, for there is every likelihood the rape gangs are operating to this day, Muslims.

In addition, their actions are consistent with those of the worst sort of invading army; raping the indigenous women-folk. Some have observed the young men arriving daily by boat are of fighting age. We could be seeing a slow-burn invasion, to which young working-class girls have become the first victims, along with those who have died in atrocities like the London bombings and knifings and the Manchester Arena.

A Stain on Modern Feminism

The grooming-gang scandal is not just a tragedy for its victims; it is a damning indictment of modern feminism. The movement’s leaders have consistently prioritised ideology over action, politics over principles, and self-preservation over solidarity. Their refusal to address this issue has left a gaping wound in their credibility and exposed the moral bankruptcy of a movement that claims to champion equality.

We can only speculate how many girls might have been spared if the feminist establishment had shown even a fraction of the outrage it reserves for less contentious causes. The grooming-gang scandal is a stain on feminism that will not be easily washed away. It is a reminder that true advocacy requires courage, not convenience; action, not abstraction. Until mainstream feminists confront their complicity, they will remain part of the problem, not the solution.

Labour’s Winter Fuel Raid Costs Taxpayers £400m →

Read and pray

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Labour’s Winter Fuel Raid Costs Taxpayers £400m

Uncategorised

Makeda

3 January 2025

Labour’s raid on winter fuel payments has already cost the taxpayer £380m after a surge in benefits claims, according to the Daily Telegraph.

Analysts have warned that the surge in pension credit claims—nearly doubling to 9,500 a week—has already cost taxpayers an unbudgeted £388 million.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves claimed in July that ‘stripping the winter fuel allowance from some 10 million pensioners would save £1.4bn a year, citing a £22bn “black hole” in the public finances.’

This staggering figure undermines the government’s narrative of fiscal prudence. Instead of plugging a £22 billion fiscal gap, the policy has inadvertently triggered a financial domino effect, revealing the superficiality of Labour’s economic strategy.

How can a policy designed to save money end up costing the taxpayer so dearly?

Support Christian Voice →

Pushing Pensioners into Poverty

By stripping 10 million pensioners of their winter fuel allowance, Labour has turned up the heat—not on Britain’s finances, but on its elderly population.

Pensioners, many of whom had previously not claimed pension credit, are now forced to navigate the benefits system for survival. This policy gambit assumes that austerity is the price of economic stability, yet it blatantly disregards the human cost.

For retirees already grappling with rising energy prices and inflation, the withdrawal of a vital lifeline is not just callous; it’s catastrophic.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The Hidden Costs of Mismanagement

Labour’s underestimation of the knock-on effects of its policy has exposed glaring flaws in its approach.

Analysts at Policy in Practice have highlighted how ‘pass-ported benefits’ linked to pension credit—such as council tax support and free prescriptions—have ballooned the cost per pensioner to £6,800 annually, nearly double the government’s estimate.

This oversight signals a failure to account for the complexity of Britain’s welfare ecosystem, where one cost-saving measure invariably creates new financial burdens. The result? A policy riddled with inefficiencies that risks eroding public trust.

A Lesson in Political Shortsightedness

The winter fuel raid epitomises Labour’s gamble on quick fixes over sustainable solutions. Sir Steve Webb, a former Pensions Minister, diplomatically called the surge in pension credit claims a “dent” in projected savings.

In reality, it’s a gaping hole, exposing the shortsightedness of Labour’s fiscal policy. As claims continue to rise, the Chancellor’s initial promise of “meaningful savings” becomes increasingly hollow.

The question remains: will Labour pivot to address the unintended consequences of this policy, or will it stubbornly cling to a sinking ship of its own making?

Labour’s DonorGate: A leadership divorced from the people →

King Charles preaches Net Zero at COP28 →

Read and pray

READ: Isaiah 1:17; Psalm 82:3; Prov 31:8-9.
.

PRAY: Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Church of England instructs Clergy to edit Christmas Carols to “avoid unnecessary offence”

Uncategorised

Makeda

24 December 2024

The Church of England has advised clergy to alter traditional Christmas carols to avoid “causing unnecessary offence,” according to the Telegraph.

Beloved hymns such as O Come, O Come, Emmanuel and Lo, He Comes With Clouds Descending- have been flagged for their supposedly “problematic” language, with clergy urged to use phrasing that “minimises” tension or confusion.

The Church’s identity crisis

The Church of England’s decision to alter beloved Christmas carols reflects a deep and troubling identity crisis. What was once a cornerstone of tradition and faith has now become an institution seemingly terrified of its own message. This latest directive, urging clergy to revise Advent hymns exemplifies a desperate attempt to placate an imagined audience that might take issue with core Christian beliefs.

It’s as if the Church is trying to market itself to a demographic that neither believes in its teachings nor respects its traditions. This absurdity calls to mind the analogy of a vegan walking into a butcher shop demanding changes to its product. The Church, instead of standing firm in its convictions, bends over backwards to accommodate every potential grievance. In doing so, it risks alienating the very people it is supposed to serve – those who come seeking faith, not a watered-down version of it.

By attempting to neutralise language about Christ’s divinity and the exclusivity of salvation, the Church is abandoning its foundational tenets. What message does this send to worshippers? That the Church itself doubts its teachings? Such an approach is not inclusive; it is self-destructive. The result is an institution so diluted that it struggles to offer anything meaningful to believers or non-believers alike.

Support Christian Voice →

A pattern of decline

This is not an isolated incident. Earlier this year, reports surfaced of a Church of England branch in Shipley transforming its services into professional wrestling events

to attract more congregants. Not long before that, the Church explored dropping the term “church” altogether to seem more accessible. These gimmicks, while perhaps well-intentioned, reveal a troubling trend: the Church of England is willing to sacrifice its identity in the futile hope of gaining popularity.

Such strategies betray a lack of confidence in the power of its own message. Instead of drawing people in with the strength of its traditions and the transformative message of the Gospel, the Church is resorting to marketing stunts and linguistic contortions. What’s next? Turning services into entertainment hubs complete with pub-style refreshments? These decisions are a far cry from the steadfast faith that has guided the Church for centuries.

The collapse in attendance and belief is not a failure of tradition but a failure of conviction. By apologising for its core tenets and pandering to societal trends, the Church alienates believers and disheartens clergy. Instead of inspiring faith, it fosters disillusionment. The Church’s inability to stand firm is not just a crisis for the institution; it reflects a broader cultural drift away from meaning and certainty.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The business analogy that hits too close to home

If the Church of England were a business, it would have gone bankrupt long ago. No successful enterprise undermines its own product to such an extent. Imagine a restaurant apologising for the quality of its food every time a customer orders. That is essentially what the Church is doing: diluting its message while simultaneously signalling shame about its own beliefs. This approach does not attract new followers; it drives them away.

The Church’s attempt to operate like a modern business – editing carols to avoid “offence” and adopting flashy, unorthodox practices like wrestling services – only underscores its desperation. Yet, businesses thrive because they offer something distinct and of value. The Church once had this in its faith and traditions, but in abandoning those, it has rendered itself indistinct. What’s left to offer when even the Church seems uncertain about its purpose?

The collapse of church attendance is a direct result of this lack of conviction. People aren’t seeking spiritual fulfilment elsewhere; they’re giving up entirely. And why wouldn’t they? If the Church itself seems unsure of its teachings, why should anyone else take them seriously? The Church’s role is not to cater to every cultural whim but to provide a stable anchor in a sea of change.

The tragic loss of conviction

The Church of England’s latest move – editing Christmas carols to avoid offending hypothetical sensitivities – is more than just a misguided attempt at relevance; it’s a tragic loss of conviction. A religious institution that cannot stand by its beliefs has little hope of inspiring faith. This failure of courage is not just damaging to the Church but to society as a whole, as it signals a retreat from moral and spiritual leadership.

The Church has historically been a source of strength, guiding communities through challenges and offering a message of hope and redemption. But today, it seems more focused on avoiding controversy than proclaiming truth. This shift is not only unappealing to potential worshippers but deeply disheartening to those who still hold onto their faith. The Church risks becoming a relic of the past, not because of its traditions but because of its abandonment of them.

If the Church of England truly wishes to regain relevance, it must stop apologizing for its beliefs and rediscover the courage of its convictions. Faith is not about pandering to the crowd; it’s about standing firm in the face of opposition. Without this resolve, the Church will continue its decline, leaving behind a legacy not of spiritual guidance but of squandered potential.

Church of England spending “excessively” on politicised roles →

Scots protect abortion as churches close →

Read and pray

READ: John 4:24;Romans 14:1; Acts 20:28; James 1:27; Colo 1:28-29; Eph. 5:27; 1 John 2:15-17
.

PRAY: Pray for the Church of England.
Pray for the UK.
Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Loophole in labour’s new puberty blockers ban

Uncategorised

Makeda

20 December 2024

Despite a seemingly decisive ban on puberty blockers for under-18s, the government’s clinical trial loophole undermines its commitment to safeguarding vulnerable children. According to an article on the Daily Mail, allowing children to participate in experimental trials amounts to exploitation, using children as “guinea pigs” to test the safety of unproven and harmful drugs.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting’s announcement of an indefinite ban acknowledged the risks associated with these drugs, citing “unacceptable safety risks” without proper safeguards. However, this is not a blanket ban.

Despite acknowledging there will be some who oppose it, Mr Streeting said plans for a clinical trial would go ahead, meaning children can sign up to have “puberty blockers” for research purposes.

By permitting clinical trials, the government opens a backdoor for the continued use of puberty blockers under the guise of research. This decision fails to address the core concern: the irreversible harm these drugs could cause to young, impressionable individuals.

Instead of a firm stance against unsafe medical practices, this loophole creates a moral and ethical contradiction. Jane, a mother whose son transitioned after being prescribed hormones, asks a chilling question in an interview with the Daily Mail: “Haven’t enough children already been damaged? Do they really need further evidence?”

The Bible says,
Mark 2:17 When Jesus heard it, He said unto them, “They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick. I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”

Support Christian Voice →

Ethical failures in gender medicine trials

The clinical trial exemption exposes a troubling reality where children may become test subjects for “chemical castration agents.” Such trials could exploit vulnerable young people, undermining the very purpose of the ban on puberty blockers. The government’s justification—that clinical trials will provide evidence of safety—has been met with widespread scepticism.

The Family Education Trust, along with former Tavistock clinicians, warns of the ethical dangers in using children for research on highly controversial drugs. They argue that this loophole prioritises advancing medical data over the immediate well-being of children. Rather than protecting young people, the policy risks turning them into experimental data points for an unproven and harmful treatment.

The government must weigh the human cost of these trials. Continuing this research without definitive evidence of safety only deepens public mistrust and fuels calls for genuine child protection measures.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The salse safety of clinical trials

Keira Bell was prescribed puberty blockers aged 16, but later changed her mind over her decision to transition to a male.

Government assurances that clinical trials will be “safely monitored” fail to address the broader ethical concerns. To describe these trials as safe while acknowledging unsafe prescribing practices creates a narrative riddled with contradictions.

The Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) itself identified the significant risks of puberty blockers. Yet, instead of taking decisive action to shield children, the government has opted for a half-measure that could perpetuate harm under the pretext of scientific advancement. This undermines the trust of families who rely on public health policies to safeguard their children.

The loophole sends a dangerous message: that children’s well-being can be compromised in pursuit of medical knowledge. Jane’s story serves as a harrowing reminder of the consequences, as she reflects on her son’s irreversible transition and asks whether more lives need to be “ruined” to validate what should already be clear.

Political posturing over child safety

The loophole in the puberty blockers ban reflects a troubling prioritisation of political appeasement over the welfare of children. Health Secretary Wes Streeting’s plan seems designed to quell both public outrage and demands for scientific evidence, yet it fails to deliver on either front.

By allowing clinical trials, the government continues to expose vulnerable young people to the same risks that warranted the initial ban. The decision lacks clarity and coherence, presenting a false narrative of safety while effectively perpetuating the same unsafe practices under a different name. Families seeking reassurance are left questioning whether political optics have overshadowed genuine reform.

Instead of bold action to protect children, the loophole reflects indecision and a failure to prioritise long-term welfare. Until the government addresses these ethical concerns head-on, its policies will remain mired in controversy and mistrust.

Trans lobbyists defy ban on puberty blockers →

NHS bans puberty blockers for children →

UK in disarray over “puberty blockers”→

NHS bans puberty blockers for children →

Puberty blocker ban extended to Northern Ireland →

Read and pray

READ: Rom 1:26-27; Acts 20:28; James 1:27; Colo 1:28-29.
.

PRAY: Pray for children going through puberty.
Pray for the UK.
Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Puberty blockers to be banned indefinitely for under-18s across UK

Uncategorised

Makeda

12 December 2024

Puberty blockers for under-18s will be banned indefinitely across the UK except for use in clinical trials, Labour has announced.

Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said that after receiving advice from medical experts, he would make existing emergency measures banning the sale and supply of puberty blockers indefinite.

The Department of Health and Social Care said the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) had published independent expert advice that there was “currently an unacceptable safety risk in the continued prescription of puberty blockers to children”.

Mr. Streeting said the commission had recommended indefinite restrictions while work is done to ensure the safety of children and young people.

Support Christian Voice →

The NHS announced in March that children would no longer be prescribed puberty blockers at gender identity clinics, with the then Conservative government saying this would help ensure care was based on evidence and was in the “best interests of the child”.

In May, that government introduced a ban on puberty blockers through emergency legislation, preventing the prescription of the medication from European or private prescribers and restricting NHS provision to within clinical trials.

A challenge to that ruling, brought by campaigners who said they were concerned for the safety and welfare of young trans people in the UK, failed in July when the high court ruled that the ban was lawful.

Puberty blockers ban extended to Scotland and Northern Ireland

The North’s Health Minister Mike Nesbitt said Executive agreement had been reached on the progression of legislation to include Northern Ireland in a UK ban on puberty blockers for children with “gender dysphoria”.

Mr Nesbitt said young people in Northern Ireland will have “equitable access” to NHS trials to determine the safety and effectiveness of puberty blocker drugs.

The government at Holyrood has said the ban will be followed in Scotland.

The Scottish government confirmed that since medicines policy was reserved to Westminster, the ban would apply across England, Scotland and Wales.

A Victory for child welfare

After months of debate and delay, the government’s decision to ban puberty blockers for individuals under 18 marks a significant step toward prioritising child welfare and safeguarding. This move acknowledges the complexities and potential consequences of medical interventions in minors, placing an emphasis on caution and responsibility.

The decision reflects growing concerns from medical professionals, parents, and advocacy groups who have questioned the long-term impacts of these treatments. Puberty blockers, once heralded as a reversible solution, have faced scrutiny for their potential to cause irreversible physical and psychological effects.

By enacting this ban, the government signals a commitment to ensuring that decisions regarding gender identity and medical treatment are made with maturity and thorough understanding.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The long road to accountability

The indefinite ban underscores a hard-earned acknowledgement of past oversights in healthcare policy. For years, critics have pointed out the lack of comprehensive research and rigorous oversight surrounding these treatments. The government’s delayed response has finally yielded a solution that prioritises scientific evidence and patient safety.

Medical ethics demand that interventions, especially those affecting children, be approached with utmost caution. This ban demonstrates a renewed commitment to ethical standards, reflecting findings from independent reviews and medical studies. It also serves as a wake-up call for institutions to prioritise rigorous assessments over ideological pressures when shaping healthcare policies.

This decisive action reinforces the principle of “do no harm,” particularly vital when dealing with adolescents who may not fully comprehend the ramifications of medical decisions. By requiring more robust support systems and stricter guidelines, the government aims to foster an environment where long-term well-being outweighs immediate gratification.

A Model for Future Policy

The government’s decision sets a precedent for tackling sensitive issues with a balance of compassion and caution. This ban highlights the importance of thorough deliberation, scientific evidence, and moral responsibility in shaping public policy.

This move could inspire similar reassessments in other areas of healthcare, particularly where treatments intersect with contentious social debates. Policymakers must continue to prioritise evidence-based decisions, fostering trust among the public and ensuring that vulnerable groups receive the protection they deserve.

Ultimately, the government’s long-overdue decision reflects a commitment to the future, ensuring policies that truly serve the best interests of children and society.

Trans lobbyists defy ban on puberty blockers →

NHS bans puberty blockers for children →

UK in disarray over “puberty blockers”→

NHS bans puberty blockers for children→

Puberty blocker ban extended to Northern Ireland →
Puberty blocker ban extended to Northern Ireland →

Read and pray

READ: John 4:24; Rom 1:26-27; Acts 20:28; James 1:27; Colo 1:28-29; Eph. 5:27; Heb 13:5;
.

PRAY: Pray for the Church of England.
Pray for the UK.
Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Church converted to a boxing ring to attract worshippers

Uncategorised

Makeda

12 December 2024

A church has begun hosting WWE-style wrestling shows in a bid to attract more congregants, according to the Daily Mail.

St Peter’s Church in Shipley has started hosting Kingdom Wrestling – a Christian professional wrestling charity which combines their show with prayer, worship and testimony.

The charity began hosting the shows at Fountains Church in Bradford, where founder Gareth ‘Angel’ Thompson built a training school for adults in 2021.

Support Christian Voice →

The Church’s sacred identity at risk

The Church is, fundamentally, a sacred space dedicated to worship, prayer, and community support.

Introducing WWE-style wrestling, with its theatrical aggression and entertainment-first ethos, risks undermining this identity. While creative outreach is vital for engaging with modern society, the Church must be cautious not to dilute its spiritual mission for the sake of attracting congregants.

Turning a sanctuary into an arena blurs the line between reverence and spectacle, potentially alienating traditional worshippers who find solace in the Church’s contemplative atmosphere.

This initiative may inadvertently send a message that the Church is willing to compromise its sacred character to remain culturally relevant. The long-term implications could weaken the Church’s standing as a moral and spiritual guide, replacing its authority with the transient appeal of popular entertainment. This approach, while innovative, needs to weigh the cost of such trade-offs.

The BIble says,
1 Corinthians 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Wrestling as a distractive outreach

Wrestling, with its inherent performative violence and competitive dynamics, could detract from the Church’s core message of peace, love, and reconciliation. Even if used as a metaphor for spiritual struggles, the medium risks overwhelming the message.

Attendees may focus more on the entertainment aspects than on the spiritual lessons, leading to a commodification of faith rather than its deepening.

By choosing wrestling as an outreach strategy, the Church risks reducing worship to a secondary activity—something that occurs around the entertainment rather than the central focus. The question remains: does such an approach truly convert hearts, or does it merely provide fleeting amusement? If entertainment becomes the primary draw, congregants may not engage with the faith’s deeper transformative aspects.

Our Lord said,
Romans 14:17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.

The slippery slope of expanding secular activities

Once the Church opens its doors to wrestling, where does it draw the line? What’s next—karaoke nights, beer festivals, or stand-up comedy shows? While these may attract people, they may also erode the distinction between the sacred and the secular. The Church risks becoming another venue for events, rather than a unique refuge for spiritual and moral guidance.

Furthermore, hosting such activities may embolden critics to question the Church’s commitment to its doctrines. When sacred spaces are used for activities perceived as incongruent with their purpose, the institution’s credibility and authority come under scrutiny. At what point does innovation become trivialisation?

The Bible says,
1 John 2:15-17 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him…For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

Alienation of Core Congregants

Introducing wrestling into the Church could alienate long-standing members who value the traditional aspects of worship. For many, the Church is a place of quiet reflection and spiritual renewal, and replacing this with loud, theatrical events risks pushing these individuals away.

Declining attendance post-pandemic already indicates a fragile connection for some; further disruptions could exacerbate the trend.

The Church should instead focus on enriching its traditional practices to address modern challenges. Bible study groups, outreach programs, and community service initiatives can provide meaningful engagement without compromising the sanctity of the space. Wrestling, while innovative, might not align with what most existing congregants seek.

Wrestling with the long-term impact

While Kingdom Wrestling has drawn attention and even led to baptisms, its sustainability as a spiritual initiative remains unproven. Once the novelty wears off, will attendees stay for the faith or move on to the next entertainment option? Faith, unlike wrestling, is a lifelong commitment that requires spiritual discipline and growth—qualities not easily cultivated in an arena setting.

The Church must critically evaluate whether such initiatives align with its long-term mission. While growth in numbers is important, spiritual depth and integrity are paramount. Wrestling might draw crowds, but fostering genuine faith requires a more intentional and sacred approach.

New churches are dropping the word ‘church’

In August 2024, a report found that the Church of England is increasingly dropping the word “church” in favour of “relevant and modern-sounding” descriptions such as “community”, a new study suggests.

The Anglican church appeared to be increasingly avoiding the word “church” when discussing the creation of new worshipping communities and congregations according to the report.

The Centre for Church Planting Theology and Research looked at the language used by 11 dioceses to describe new churches.

The creation of a new church group is traditionally referred to as a “church plant”. But the report found that while 900 new churches had been started by the dioceses in the past decade, none had used the phrase “church plant” as the primary way to describe the project.

Tory Leadership: Do any of the candidates do God? →

The Church of England’s Foreign Secretary→

Blasphemy: Bishop Says All Churches Must Get Involved→

Read and pray

READ: John 4:24; Acts 20:28; Rom 1:26-27; Eph. 5:27; Col 1:28-29; James 1:27; Heb 13:5;
.

PRAY: Pray for the Church of England.
Pray for the UK.
Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Church of England spending “excessively” on politicised roles

Uncategorised

Makeda

6 December 2024

WhatsApp Image 2024-12-09 at 11.09.03 — The Church of England building

The Church of England is overspending on HR and “politicised roles” such as diversity, sodomy and Net Zero officers at the expense of parishes,according to the Telegraph.

Research by the think-tank Civitas found that a “managerial turn” in the Anglican church in the past two decades had left ordinary parishes “struggling to survive”.

The report said the Church’s 42 dioceses had taken on “large numbers of staff” since the turn of the millennium while merging parishes and reducing clergy numbers to cut costs.

These administrative positions include human resources jobs and a series of “politicised roles” such as diversity, social justice, LGBT and net zero officers, the report found.

Support Christian Voice →

Expansion of bureaucracy

The expansion of CoFE’s bureaucracy has reached astonishing levels. On average, dioceses employ one administrator for every three-and-a-half priests, diverting resources away from the spiritual and community-focused mission of the Church. The Diocese of Truro exemplifies this disparity, with 39 administrative officers overseeing just 41 clerics. Such mis-allocation of funds and personnel raises serious concerns about the Church’s priorities in supporting its foundational parish model.

The financial implications are stark. Administrative costs now consume 21% of diocesan budgets, nearly double the proportion spent by prominent charities like Oxfam and the RNLI.

This unsustainable focus on centralised management undermines the very essence of parish communities, which are rapidly disappearing under the weight of institutional inefficiency and mismanagement.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

The Decline of Parish Life

The Civitas report paints a bleak picture of the Church of England’s shifting focus, with millions directed towards bureaucracy while parishes face diminishing resources. Author Oxfam and the Esmé Partridge warns that the cuts to clergy numbers leave remaining priests overstretched, covering increasingly larger geographical areas. This erosion of local clergy presence is a direct threat to the Church’s role as a cornerstone of community life and heritage.

Against claims that the parish model is outdated, the report argues for its revival as a vital source of tradition and solidarity. Parishes provide sanctity and a sense of belonging, yet their decline risks the Church’s ability to meet the spiritual and practical needs of communities. The Civitas findings suggest that the Church’s priorities are out of step with its historic mission and the expectations of its congregants.

Further evidence of misplaced investment lies in the Church’s strategic mission schemes, which often result in the merging of parishes. In one example from Wigan, the Diocese of Liverpool spent £1.2 million reorganising churches into hubs and worship communities in non-traditional settings. The project, far from revitalising engagement, led to a 30% decline in church attendance and a one-third reduction in congregational donations, demonstrating the failure of these experimental approaches.

The Cost of bureaucratic bloat

The Church of England’s bureaucratic expansion has drawn criticism for prioritising administration over ministry. With diocesan offices swelling in size and scope, traditional parish churches are left to shoulder the burden of dwindling clergy and resources. This bureaucratic obsession is not only draining funds but also eroding the Church’s spiritual presence in local communities.

One of the report’s most damning findings is the Church’s divergence from the financial prudence seen in major charities. Administrative expenses account for an alarming 21% of diocesan budgets, dwarfing the 10-12% spent by organisations like Oxfam and the RNLI. This disproportionate allocation betrays a lack of accountability and a disregard for the primary mission of the Church: serving its parishioners.

The implications of this managerial drift are profound. As parishes merge and clergy numbers dwindle, the Church’s local presence is fading, jeopardising its ability to provide community support, charity, and spiritual guidance. The Civitas report’s call to revive the parish system as a bastion of tradition and community solidarity should serve as a wake-up call. Without urgent reform, the Church risks alienating its congregants and losing its relevance in the fabric of British society.

Tory Leadership: Do any of the candidates do God? →

The Church of England’s Foreign Secretary→

Blasphemy: Bishop Says All Churches Must Get Involved→

Read and pray

READ: Matt 16:18 ; John 4:24; Rom 1:26-27; Acts 20:28; James 1:27; Colo 1:28-29; Ephe 2:20-22; Heb 13:5; Rev 2:4-5
.

PRAY: Pray the Lord will raise up God-fearing men of truth and integrity.
Pray for the UK.
Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Boots’ woke 2024 Christmas ad

Uncategorised

Makeda

23 November 2024

Boots’ 2024 Christmas ad has sparked outrage for its ‘woke’ agenda.

Social media users have accused the ad of promoting a ‘woke monstrosity’ rather than celebrating the time-honoured Christian festival.

The inclusion of ‘gender-neutral’ pronouns at the end of the ad led some social media users to call for a boycott, labelling the campaign as a departure from the essence of a classic British Christmas.

This reaction illustrates the growing frustration with corporate advertisements becoming politicised.

Support Christian Voice →

Criticism Fuelled by Casting and Message

The backlash intensified due to the casting of Adjoa Andoh as ‘Mrs. Claus’. Online critics argued that Boots’ decision to cast her, alongside the ad’s broader emphasis on ‘inclusivity’, and ‘diversity’, alienated traditional viewers. Detractors viewed the campaign as prioritising social messaging over festive joy, with many describing it as an unnecessary shift from beloved Christmas traditions.

The ad even promoted trans ideology with ‘Oh that’s very them’ at the end.

Social media users labelled the ad as political, calling for boycott of the brand.

Ask us to come and speak at your church →

Boots Ad politically motivated?

The backlash has been fuelled not only by the content of the ad but also by Andoh’s past public comments on racial diversity, which resurfaced during the campaign.

It is therefore not out of place to say that Boots’ casting decision was politically motivated and that they simply did not care if they alienated their customer base. Customers for Boots seem to be a problem whose attitudes must be subjecdt to education.

Naturally, supporters of the ad applauded Boots for showcasing a modern re-imagining of holiday traditions.

While some argue these initiatives are necessary for representation, others view them as performative or even divisive. The polarised response to Boots’ campaign reveals their problem. Are their advertising department there to sell product and benefit their shareholders, or is it there to satisfy the prejudices of its staff?

Petition: Stop Transgenderism Now! →

Yet to watch the ad? Here it is!

Christmas NOT gender war

The idea of turning Christmas into a platform for so-called ‘woke agendas’ dilutes the essence of what Christmas represents. It’s the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ in a constitutionally-Christian country. Christmas, at its core, is a deeply spiritual and religious occasion cherished for centuries by Christians around the world. Its traditions are rooted in the values of love, sacrifice, and redemption, as exemplified by the life and teachings of Christ. Above all, it tells us that God humbled himself to become part of his creation and partake in our human condition, in order to reconcile mankind to himself.

The Bible says,
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

By focusing on ‘woke’ themes, companies trivialise both the faith on which our nation was built and the failed causes their staff aim to highlight. Christmas is not a backdrop for activism or progressive messaging; it is a sacred occasion that calls for reverence and reflection.

The Bible says,
2 Corinthians 9:15 Thanks be unto God for his unspeakable gift.

If brands truly wish to engage with Christmas, they should at the very least remember ‘the reason for the season’ and emphasise themes like humility, faith, compassion, charity, and hope, which are aligned with the teachings of Christ.

They should never overlook the deep spiritual and historical roots of Christmas. Respecting its origins and celebrating it authentically the Lord himself as well as the millions who hold this holiday dear as a time to reflect on their faith and the birth of our Saviour.

Tory Leadership: Do any of the candidates do God? →

Costa promotes mutilation as Government delays schools “transgender” guidance →

Read and pray

READ: Psalm 103:11-13; Isaiah 7:14; Zech 9:9; Matt 1:18-25;Luke 1:26-35; Luke 2:8-14; John 1:14; Rom 15:13; Gal 4:4-5; 1 John 1:5-9; Philip 2:8-11.
.

PRAY: Pray the Lord will raise up God-fearing men of truth and integrity.
Pray for our country.
Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Pray against any form of communications method used to promote sodomy.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

Parental freedom at risk

EHCR Human Rights Protocol

Germany’s shadow: A cautionary tale for free nations

Indoctrination disguised as education

Blaming parents for state failures

Defending common law and Biblical order

Related articles

Read and pray

Support us!

A nation desensitised

A culture feeding on vulnerability

Virginity shamed, lust glorified

Clarion Call to Christians: Stand for Truth

Pray

Support us!

A £75 Lie: How the culture war is being monetised

Subverting the call to protection

Red carpet rebels

Clothing as indoctrination

Marketing mythology

Christians must not be silent

Read and pray

Support us!

Sneers, deflections and familiar lines

The government’s pattern of contempt

The culture of cowardice and denial

A national scandal, a national betrayal

The price of political expediency

A reckoning still to come

Related Story

Read and pray

Support us!

Faith or Another Media-friendly Moment?

Defender of Which Faith?

“Not My King”

Inclusivity or Erasure?

Silenced for the Truth

Common Sense Restored – The Supreme Court’s Definition of a Woman

A Call to Courage

Related Stories

Read and pray

Support us!

Ignoring the reality of childhood trauma

The Cass review

Repeating past mistakes at the expense of safety

Dismissing the concerns of experts

A system in crisis

Related Stories

Read and pray

Support us!

‘Queering Climate Change,’?

The UKRI: A bureaucratic behemoth

Who are these people?

Nine Councils: A jobs programme for the elite

Public services cut while professors reap the rewards

Sir Keir Starmer expanding Quango state

Related Stories

Pray

Support us!

Workplace Coercion

The rising backlash against NHS insanity

Institutionalising a delusion

NHS betrays women’s rights

Reckless leadership, unavoidable consequences

Related Stories

Read and pray

Support us!

GCHQ’s retreat

The UK’s hypocrisy on foreign influence

Stonewall’s waning influence

The erosion of ‘five eyes’ unity

Transgender clinics close in India after Trump cuts USAID

Related Stories

Read and Pray

Support us!

A health minister who denies biology

Wes Streeting’s role in gender chaos

The attack on single-sex spaces

The dangers of denying reality

A party that cannot be trusted