Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
    Latest

    UK Christian Constitution

    Home UK Christian Constitution

    Elections: Why the people revolted

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0
    Nigel Farage celebrates huge gains for Reform
    Nigel Farage celebrates huge gains for Reform
    Nigel Farage celebrates huge gains for Reform
    Nigel Farage celebrates huge gains for Reform

    With virtually all the results in, it is clear the people have had enough of the Labour Party and are not too pleased with the Conservatives either. They are now looking to Reform for hope. These are the results to date, according to the BBC, with most counting now done:

    England:
    Reform: 1444 (up 1442 seats)
    Labour: 997 (down 1406 seats)
    Liberal Democrats: 834 (up 151 seats)
    Conservatives: 773 (down 557 seats)
    Greens: 515 (up 374 seats)
    Independents: 199 (up 27 seats)
    Other 36 (down 41 seats)

    Scotland:
    Scottish National Party 58 seats 6 seats lost
    Labour 17 seats 4 seats lost
    Reform UK 17 seats 17 seats gained
    Scottish Green 15 seats 6 seats gained
    Conservative 12 seats 19 seats lost
    Liberal Democrat 10 seats 6 seats gained
    Change since 2021. 65 seats needed for a majority.

    Wales:
    Plaid Cymru 43 seats 20 seats gained
    Reform UK 34 seats 34 seats gained
    Labour 9 seats 35 seats lost
    Conservative 7 seats 22 seats lost
    Green 2 seats 2 seats gained
    Liberal Democrat 1 seat 1 seat gained
    Change since 2021. 49 seats needed for a majority.

    England

    The people’s revolt in England was driven on the surface by the failure of successive governments to keep their promises to stop illegal immigration, by a crime wave, by Labour’s perplexing positions on gender, by the costs of energy, food and housing, by declines in living standards and by a general pessimism. This is the first generation for centuries where people do not expect to do as well as their parents did.

    But under the surface, the spiritual reality is that immigration has been driven by rebellion against the Lord, by a deliberately elitist anti-Christian multiculturalism, exalting ‘the climate’ over prosperity, food and energy security, attacking God’s institution of the family, even his creation ordinance of ‘male and female’, making it harder to work for a living, which scripture says is the ’gift of God’, by overbearing, unscriptural levels of taxation and forgetting the divine function of the state is to maintain law and order and security.

    As results were being announced, at least one senior UK Labour government figure was acknowledging a widespread public feeling of insecurity. Defence Secretary John Healey stating that, ‘You can’t feel hopeful if you don’t feel secure’. Having been let down by ‘the uniparty’, voters felt they had nothing left to lose.

    Working-class revolt

    Ordinary, working-class people are feeling the insecurity most. Writing in Spiked Online, Brendan O’Neill ventured:

    “It’s a seismic realignment. It feels like an unspoken, unbloody revolt: the calm but firm defeat of two-party politics by working-class communities who feel that such a system no longer represents them. Who feel, in fact, that the knackered duopoly, whether as a result of its moral cowardice or its strangulation by bureaucracy, is incapable of pursuing the restoration of sovereign integrity and social wisdom that they are crying out for.

    “Labour and its media sympathisers will comfort themselves today with talk of a ‘bloody nose’ from ‘voters who just want to be heard’, when in truth we could be witnessing as radical a transformation of the political landscape as the founding of the Labour Party itself was in 1900. We could be witnessing another reasoned intrusion of working-class voters into a political realm that they feel is too small, smug and insular to contain, far less enact, their political desires. …

    “Such is the flux of our era that much might change again between now and the General Election. Yet no one can look at England this morning and deny that the masses have executed a coup against a complacent regime by choosing Reform as the new vessel of their moral hopes.”

    Scotland

    Anyone concerned about the stability of the United Kingdom will be pleased that the Scottish National Party (SNP) did not win outright in Scotland. However, they could form a government with the Scottish Greens, who are also in favour of independence and alignment with the EU.

    The SNP flip-flopped on drilling in the North Sea to try to keep the North-East on side, but in general they are pro-Net Zero. They also join the Greens in their post-truth transgenderism.

    Of course the last SNP-Green coalition ended in disaster in 2024. Then SNP first minister, Humza Yousaf, threw them out before being ejected himself. But we shall see. Either way, the biblical pattern for leadership, that leaders at every level should be:
    Exo 18:21 … able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; …
    Seems as long a way off in Scotland as anywhere else in the United Kingdom.

    Wales

    Plaid Cymru (PC: Party of Wales) are now the biggest party in the Senedd, despite propping up the previous Labour administration on everything from 20mph streets, pro-migrant ‘nation of sanctuary’, extreme sex education (when is sex education ever not extreme?), Net Zero and stopping farmers from growing food.

    Around the lanes, it was a puzzle to see Plaid Cymru placards outside farms. Turkeys were voting for Christmas, ignoring PC’s pro-trans policies and their anti-farm dogma, in favour of the cosy thought that at least Plaid were very Welsh.

    So it is a mercy that in Wales, the advocates of independence do not have the numbers even to take office with the Greens. Will Labour join a coalition with them after their resounding defeat? Who knows? The psalmist prayed for confusion amongst his enemies.

    It is probably also a mercy for Reform that they did not win in Wales. The system would have been against them, obstructing their every move. They now have the opportunity to watch how it works and prepare to take control next time while harassing the Plaid Cymru establishment, pointing out the antagonism of the ‘Party of Wales’ to Welsh farmers, parents, security, society, enterprise and decency.

    Foreign languages

    We must pray against the rise of Islam under the Green Party banner in England. One Don Keith tweeted: ‘Green Party “victory” video shows zero English spoken. A room full of foreign languages celebrating their takeover of a British council. This is what replacement looks like in real time.’

    On GB News a Green Party member, one John Grant, reacted to members of his party making an announcement in a foreign language during their campaign for London’s Newham: ‘I didn’t understand a word of what he said… it does make me a little uncomfortable I can’t deny’. He should be more than ‘uncomfortable’.

    In majority-Muslim ghetto areas, sectarian campaigns were being conducted in Urdu or Bengali, focussing on ‘Palestine’ rather than potholes. Pretending Israel is conducting ‘genocide’ in Gaza took precedence over local, or even UK, issues.

    The people need leaders of faith

    If it is God who sets up kings, then the result is indeed a seismic shift from on high. But it remains that the people need leaders who can grasp the spiritual dimension and operate under the blessing of Jesus Christ, driven by the power of the Holy Spirit. They need to be, not just nominal Christians, but God-fearing men.

    READ: Gen 1:27, Exod 18:21; Deut 6:3, 12:28; 1Chron 16:11; 2Sam 10:12; Psa 14:1, 35:4, 149:4-9; Eccl 3:13; Dan 2:21; Matt 20:15; John 15:5: Acts 17:7; Rom 13:3-6; 1Tim 6:15;

    PRAY: For God to raise up God-fearing leaders after his own heart, for them to see that they can do nothing without Christ and to seek his face to lead and prosper the people.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Why our Armed Forces are in a moral morass

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0
    Gen Sir Roly Walker trying to defend the Army in front of the House of Commons Defence Select Committee.
    British Troops recover the Falklands in 1982
    British Troops recover the Falklands in 1982

    At a time when Argentinian politicians have renewed demands on the Falkland Islands, apparently supported by the United States Pentagon, we have to ask whether our armed forces could even try to defend the British Overseas Territory.

    The Telegraph reports that our Attorney General, Richard (Lord) Hermer, has insulted British troops, persecuted them in the courts, and hailed Keir Starmer’s ‘groundbreaking’ work suing soldiers. Would those currently in office even want to resist claims over the Falklands? Could they if they wanted to?

    RAF cadet suspended over Islam claim

    Last month, Spiked Online reports an RAF cadet was suspended after he said Islam poses the greatest security threat to the UK, while taking part in a training exercise. He made the comment during a question-and-answer session in which he and other cadets were asked about dangers to British security.

    Group Captain Lizzy Nicholl resigned over the RAF diversity poilcy. (Credit: Sky News)
    Group Captain Lizzy Nicholl resigned over the RAF diversity policy. (Credit: Sky News)

    It led to him being kicked off the officer-training course, pending an investigation. This is the same RAF, let us recall, which was forced to compensate 31 white male applicants after officers introduced diversity targets to increase women and ethnic minority recruits at the expense of those recruiters described as ‘useless white male pilots’.

    Group Captain Lizzy Nicholl, head of RAF recruiting, resigned in August 2022 over the pressure to implement this policy. That’s right, a woman was in charge of RAF recruiting. But she could see how wrong the RAF’s diversity policy was.

    ‘It’s extremism, not Islam!’

    Rear Admiral Chris Parry (rtd)
    Rear Admiral Chris Parry (rtd)

    Even while defending him, a senior officer had to be politically correct. the Mail reports that retired Rear Admiral Chris Parry accused the RAF of shutting down the ‘critical thinking’ of new officers around controversial issues and said the cadet should be reinstated.

    He went on: ‘Clearly Islamic extremism is the issue and not Islam, but how are young people expected to develop critical thinking around these complex issues if they are shut down in this way?’

    The Iftar in Trafalgar Square on Monday 16th March 2026, Ramadan's 'Night of Power'
    The Iftar in Trafalgar Square on Monday 16th March 2026, Ramadan’s ‘Night of Power’

    But hang on. Only last month we reported on the Trafalgar Square Iftar, described by Nick Timothy MP as as ‘act of domination’. Are the hundreds of Muslims who took part in that demonstration extremists, or ordinary Muslims posing no threat?

    When polled, three quarters of Muslims praise Hamas for the 7th October 2023 atrocity and say Israel has no right to exist. Jihad, antisemitism and sexual abuse are written into the Islamic scriptures. Despite all that, our elites, including retired admirals, have to toe the multicultural line.

    Blame ‘manosphere’, not us!

    Also last month, the Telegraph reported General Sir Roly Walker, Chief of the General Staff, blaming the online ‘manosphere’ for ‘sexist’ behaviours among young recruits when asked by the Commons Defence Select Committee how he proposed to protect female personnel in the Army.

    Gen Sir Roly Walker trying to defend the Army in front of the House of Commons Defence Select Committee.

    Sir Roly’s appearance came after an inquest last year found the Army had failed to take action after Gunner Jaysley Beck endured sexual harassment from a superior officer in the months before she took her own life.

    It was all down to social media misogyny, said the Chief of the General Staff. It could not possibly be a lack of discipline or basic Christian morality causing NCOs to prey on young female recruits, could it?

    Army’s ‘Values and Standards’

    For that matter, what did they expect when they placed young women and young men together in a military environment? Sir Roly admitted recruits ‘are between the ages of 17-and-a-half and 20’. Feminists demanded women serve alongside men in barracks, on ships, and our politicians agreed. What could possibly go wrong?

    Gunner Jaysley Beck. Took her own life when the Army failed to support her when she was sexually assaulted by a senior officer unaware of the Army's 'Values and Standards.
    Gunner Jaysley Beck. Took her own life when the Army failed to support her when she was sexually assaulted by a senior officer apparently unaware of the Army’s ‘Values and Standards.

    Sir Roly was surely right to observe ‘The level of sexualisation of young people in society, the level of exposure to drugs, drink, alcohol, violence in wider society’. He said recruits come in with ‘behaviours which are at odds with our values and standards.’ But it was a married Warrant Officer who assaulted Gunner Jaysley, a very senior respected NCO. Was he not aware of the Army’s ‘values and standards’?

    In 2021, the Atherton report said the MoD and armed forces were failing to protect female personnel. Sir Roly boasted to the Committee that ‘for the first time, there is a woman serving at every rank of the British Army.’ How did that protect Jaysley Beck and all the other young women who have been sexually assaulted in the armed forces?

    Armed Forces need repentance

    Without wholesale repentance, a rooting out of secularism and a return to Christ and the muscular Christian standards which were a part of the ethos of our armed forces even up to the time of the Second World War, the decline will continue. And the Falkland Islanders might want to get armed, and trained, as a matter of urgency.

    READ: Exod 15:3; Numb 32:25-27; 1Sam 4:9; Neh 4:14; Isa 19:16, 42:13; Luke 22:38; 1 Cor 16:13; 1Tim 2:9.

    PRAY: For national repentance.

    Use this UK Parliament link to email your MP →

    WRITE: Ask your MP if he agrees the armed forces will only root out sexual exploitation within their ranks by a return to Christian standards and Christian morality.

    Previous Articles

    It ain’t half woke, Mum. Soldiers wearing make-up? →

    King Endorses Sodomy in Armed Forces →

    Anti-trans British Army officer cleared →

    US General puts UK’s man in his place →

    Army puts diversity above effectiveness (2018) →

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Why is Starmer out of touch with working Britain?

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0

    If there is one thing Sir Keir Starmer does with remarkable consistency, it is appointing people spectacularly unsuited to the roles they are given.

    It is, at this point, less a coincidence and more a governing principle.

    One might have thought that after dusting off figures like Peter Mandelson, a relic of a political era many assumed had been quietly buried, there would be some attempt to reassure the public that competence still mattered. Instead, we are treated to a rolling parade of appointments that suggest the only real qualification required is ideological loyalty.

    Take David Lammy, who manages to combine high office with a talent for geopolitical confusion, or Rachel Reeves, whose approach to growth appears to involve carefully suffocating it. Together, they form part of an administration that increasingly resembles a social experiment: how far can you run a country on theory alone?

    Ezekiel 34:2–4 Woe be to the shepherds… that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks?

    The Appointment

    Lisa Pinney ‘works with others to bring change, speaking at events and supporting individuals and organisations to be more LGBT+ inclusive’
    Lisa Pinney ‘works with others to bring change, speaking at events and supporting individuals and organisations to be more LGBT+ inclusive’

    Enter the latest inspired choice, Lisa Pinney, newly installed as chief executive of the Fair Work Agency, a body created by merging several others, seemingly to justify its own necessity.

    Lisa Pinney ‘works with others to bring change, speaking at events and supporting individuals and organisations to be more LGBT+ inclusive’.

    Ms Pinney’s credentials are, we are assured, impeccable, provided one believes that running an economy is best preparation for… well… diversity seminars.

    Her career is steeped in “inclusion,” “intersectionality,” and the kind of language that thrives in HR departments but tends to evaporate the moment it encounters an actual balance sheet. A former board member of Stonewall and a decorated champion of workplace identity politics, she has spent years advising organisations on how to be more “inclusive.”

    How reassuring, then, that she will now help oversee the conditions under which businesses must operate—despite no obvious experience of running one. But perhaps that is the point.

    Why burden a regulator with real-world knowledge when ideological enthusiasm will do? Why understand business when you can supervise it from a safe distance, armed with the latest terminology and a PowerPoint presentation on “authentic leadership”?

    Naturally, she is not alone. The agency’s chairman, Matthew Taylor, brings with him a similarly impressive record, if by impressive one means an unbroken career within the comfortable confines of government bodies, think tanks, and publicly funded institutions. Between them, they form a leadership team perfectly qualified to explain to businesses why they are doing everything wrong. And still the question lingers: has anyone in charge ever actually run a business?

    Apparently not and apparently, it no longer matters.

    Proverbs 31:10–12 Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.
    Proverbs 31:25 Strength and honour are her clothing.
    Stop Transgenderism Now! →

    Ideology Dressed as Expertise

    What we are witnessing is not simply poor judgment. It is the triumph of ideology over competence.

    This government does not appoint people who understand the sectors they oversee. It appoints people who think correctly about them. There is a difference—and it is proving rather costly.

    Consider Minouche Shafik, now shaping economic thinking at the highest level. An accomplished figure in the world of global institutions, certainly but one whose instincts lean predictably towards higher taxes and greater redistribution. In other words, precisely the kind of thinking guaranteed to alarm the very people expected to generate growth.

    It is a curious strategy: to entrust economic stewardship to those who appear, at best, ambivalent about wealth creation.

    Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.
    Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

    A Government Detached From Reality

    There is something profoundly disordered about a system that elevates theory above wisdom, activism above experience, and image above truth. Scripture speaks often of the importance of sound judgment, of leaders who understand the weight of responsibility placed upon them.

    What we see instead is a kind of performative governance—appointments made not to serve the common good, but to signal virtue to a narrow ideological audience.

    It is governance as theatre. And so we arrive at the inevitable conclusion.

    A government that cannot tell the difference between activism and ability will continue to appoint the wrong people. A leadership class insulated from real-world consequences will continue to make decisions that baffle those who must live with them.

    And a nation governed in this way will, sooner or later, feel the cost.

    For now, however, the show goes on.

    More appointments. More slogans. More carefully curated “experts” explaining to everyone else how things ought to work—while quietly demonstrating that they have very little idea how they actually do.

    Isaiah 10:1–2 Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees.

    Related Articles

    Sir Keir Starmer taking control of people’s lives’? →

    Labour’s DonorGate: A leadership divorced from the people →

    Council cuts funding for ‘pride’ event →

    Council CEO rejects order to remove “pride flag” →

    Christian councillor suspended for ‘Pride is a sin’ →

    ‘Ealing Council strikes at freedom of assembly →

    Read and pray

    READ: Gen 1:27; Amos 5:14–15, Eccles 10:2, Eccles 10:16–17, Isa 3:4–5, Isa 10:1–2, Jer 5:21, Hos 8:7, Matt 23:23–24, Luke 16:10, Rom 1:22, 1 Cor 1:27, Col 2:8, James 3:15–16.

    PRAY:Pray against foolish leadership.

    Pray for discernment in the Church.

    Pray for restoration of righteous foundations.
    Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Send for your Free Christian Voice Newsletter (Easter 2026)

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0
    Newsletter Easter 2026 front page
    Newsletter Easter 2026 front page
    Newsletter Easter 2026 front page
    Newsletter Easter 2026 front page

    Our flagship newsletter, published by God’s grace ten times a year, with fifteen pages of Bible-based contemporary content, only goes out by post. It contains a round-up of our social media activity, including articles on this website. There is some confidential prayer and action information for Christians which does not appear online.

    Fill in the form below for a free copy. UK ONLY.

    Our Easter 2026 newsletter leads on a call for our elites to proclaim the King of kings in the face of what can only be seen as a judgment falling upon this United Kingdom. Muslims held an open-air Iftar in Trafalgar Square complete with an ‘Adhan’, a proclamation of Islamic supremacy. It was an act of domination, in the same week that our House of Lords voted in favour of abortion up to birth.

    We also report that the heir to the throne, Prince William, scarcely has any faith in the King of kings. We analyse King Charles’s Christmas message, asking why it was so ‘on message’, with constant references to ‘communities’ and diversity’. Add in the result of the Gorton and Denton by-election, won in February 2026 by the antichrist Green Party, and we have an emergency. The need for the Church in our land to emerge as a prophetic voice could not be clearer. You can be part of the solution!

    So fill in the form below for your free copy (UK only):

    Support us as well!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Will Hungary Stand, or Fall to the Globalists?

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0
    Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Fidesz scored 44.2 percent, significantly lower than polls had predicted. | Attila Kisbenedek/AFP via Getty Images
    Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Fidesz scored 44.2 percent, significantly lower than polls had predicted. | Attila Kisbenedek/AFP via Getty Images
    Prime Minister Viktor Orban with President Donald Trump.
    Prime Minister Viktor Orban with President Donald Trump.

    This is a call to prayer! Hungary stands on the brink of decisive national elections that will determine the future direction of its government and parliament. 

    On Sunday 12th April 2026, voters will elect representatives to the National Assembly, deciding whether Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his ruling party will continue to shape the country’s political and moral landscape for righteousness and their Christian heritage.

    These elections are not merely administrative; they represent a deeper ideological contest between national sovereignty and external influence, between traditional values and progressive liberalism.

    At stake is not only Hungary’s domestic policy but its place within Europe and the wider global order. Tibor Fischer explains it all here.

    Proverbs 29:2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    Foreign Money and Influence: Attempts to Unseat Orbán

    Reports have emerged alleging that significant foreign funding is being channelled into Hungary to bolster opposition forces seeking to unseat Viktor Orbán.

    According to investigations, networks linked to George Soros and elements within the U.S. Democratic political sphere are accused of funnelling millions into opposition campaigns.

    Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary
    Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary

    Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, addressing the nation on state media, spotlighted a classified national security report slated for declassification that proves Ukrainian involvement in funnelling cash to Tisza.

    “This is not speculation or a suspicion; it’s documented in a written report submitted to the national security committee,” Mr. Orbán declared.

    He revealed that Hungarian authorities seized tens of millions in cash connected to Ukraine’s bank right on Hungarian territory.

    This represents a coordinated effort to reshape Hungary’s political landscape from outside its borders, raising serious concerns about sovereignty, electoral integrity, and the role of global actors in domestic affairs.

    Psalm 12:8 The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.

    Why Orbán Faces Opposition

    Prime minister Viktor Orbán has drawn sustained criticism from international actors for his firm stance against what he describes as globalist overreach.

    His government has resisted European Union expansionism, asserting Hungary’s right to determine its own policies without external imposition.

    Central to this resistance is his opposition to figures like George Soros, whose advocacy for open societies and migration policies has clashed sharply with Mr. Orbán’s vision of national identity and border control.

    This ideological divide has made Hungary a focal point in a broader geopolitical struggle.

    Amos 5:10 They hate him that rebuketh in the gate, and they abhor him that speaketh uprightly.

    linked Funding Streams

    Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Fidesz scored 44.2 percent, significantly lower than polls had predicted. | Attila Kisbenedek/AFP via Getty Images
    Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz scored 44.2 percent, significantly lower than polls had predicted. | Attila Kisbenedek/AFP via Getty Images

    For years, a network of foreign-backed funding channels, linked to political actors in the United States, has been accused of directing substantial financial support toward opposition movements in Hungary.

    Particular attention has been drawn to the role of agencies such as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), both of which operate with public funding while supporting civil society initiatives abroad.

    Since 2008, USAID has reportedly funded a range of Hungarian NGOs, with figures suggesting that more than $20 million was distributed between 2021 and 2025, including support for media outlets such as 444.hu and Átlátszó.

    Programmes like USAID’s Central Europe initiative, launched in 2022, have been presented as efforts to strengthen democratic institutions. However, such initiatives risk influencing domestic politics by bolstering organisations aligned with opposition causes.

    Reports indicate that outlets like Átlátszó have received a notable portion of their funding through these channels, while Hungary’s Sovereignty Protection Office has identified USAID-linked funding streams supporting activist networks, including organisations such as the Autonomy Foundation.

    National Endowment for Democracy’s Role

    The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has also been criticised for having granted funds to anti-government media and civil groups since 2008. According to its own annual reporting, the organisation supports thousands of projects globally each year, including initiatives within Hungary.

    In 2018, organisations associated with NED funding such as the Hungarian Helsinki Committee came under political attack and were labelled “Soros Mecenaries”, accused of contributing to domestic political tensions.

    Between 2008 and 2016, total grants to Hungarian-related initiatives are reported to have exceeded $5 million, often described as supporting goals like “media pluralism” during periods of economic and political instability.

    Supporters argue these programmes are intended to strengthen democratic institutions and civil society, while critics contend they amount to undue external influence in Hungary’s internal affairs.

    Electoral Humiliation

    Reeling from the aftermath of the 2016 election, some Democratic-aligned figures and networks framed their subsequent efforts as part of a broader mission to “protect” or “save” democratic processes. Within that context, Higher Ground Laboratories (HGL) was established in 2017 by former Obama-Biden campaign affiliates, including Betsy Hoover, Shomik Dutta, and Elizabeth MacLaughlin, positioning itself as a Chicago-based venture fund focused on progressive political technology.

    By 2021, HGL had reportedly invested fifty million dollars across a portfolio of startups, reflecting a growing ecosystem of digital tools aimed at political organising and campaigning. Among its notable transactions was a majority investment in DatAdat, a political technology firm later rebranded as Estratos Digital and operating across both the United States and Europe. Supporters of such investments describe them as part of a globalisation of campaign infrastructure and data-driven political engagement. However, the export of advanced campaign technologies into foreign political environments raises questions about influence, transparency, and the role of external actors in domestic electoral processes.

    Attention has also been drawn to the use of platforms such as Lunda, associated with Estratos Digital and reportedly utilised in fundraising and campaign activities by political actors including Hungary’s Tisza Party.

    Reports of a data breach in 2026, which allegedly exposed personal and transactional information belonging to thousands of individuals, further intensified scrutiny.

    The Transparency Law: A Flashpoint with Globalists

    Opposition lawmakers lit flares in protest during the voting session.
    Opposition lawmakers lit flares in protest during the voting session

    One of the most contentious measures introduced under Viktor Orbán’s leadership is Hungary’s Transparency Act, adopted on 13th June 2017. The law requires organisations receiving more than $1,300 annually from foreign sources to register as entities “receiving support from abroad.”

    The legislation simply deals with registration and does not ban such organisations or restrict their operations. It seeks to ensure transparency in foreign funding. Notably, it exempts religious groups, sports associations, and national minority organisations.

    Despite its limited scope, the law has provoked strong backlash from international critics, who argue it targets civil society. The globalist-funded Hungary opposition, fearing exposure, lit flares in the voting session. Supporters, however, view it as a necessary safeguard against undisclosed foreign influence in national affairs.

    John 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light.

    Migration Policy: Defiance of EU Pressure

    Hungary has consistently refused to participate in the European Union’s migration redistribution schemes, maintaining strict border controls and rejecting quotas for migrant resettlement. The government argues that such policies are essential for preserving national security and cultural identity.

    This stance has placed Hungary at odds with EU authorities, who advocate for shared responsibility among member states.

    For Mr. Orbán’s administration, however, migration is not merely a logistical issue but a defining question of sovereignty and national preservation.

    Proverbs 22:3 A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself.

    “LGBT” Laws and Political Divide

    Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party has taken a firm stance on cultural issues, particularly regarding “LGBT” policies.

    The government has enacted laws restricting the promotion of homosexuality to minors and recently banned Pride marches, citing concerns about child welfare.

    Prime Minister Viktor Orbán defended the measures, stating that “woke ideology” would not be allowed to influence children. These policies stand in stark contrast to those of opposition groups, who advocate for expanded LGBT rights and alignment with broader European liberal standards.

    “Pride” marches had been held for the past 30 years in Hungary. Opposition lawmakers lit flares during the voting session on Tuesday, while demonstrators blocked a bridge in central Budapest. Human rights groups have also condemned the move.

    On the other side of the coin, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has brought in a raft of tax breaks to encourage couples to have children. Already, reports Population Research Institute, and the Hungarian Center for Fundamental Rights, these have raised the birth rate from 1.4 to 1.6. But Mr Orbán is seeking to raise it closer to replacement level of 2.1, at least. Abortion has also fallen, reports US-based Students for Life.

    This cultural divide has become a central battleground in Hungarian politics, reflecting deeper disagreements about identity, family, and societal values.

    Romans 12:2 Be not conformed to this world.

    Stop Transgenderism Now! →

    Foreign Policy and a Call to Prayer

    Hungary’s foreign policy, particularly its more measured stance toward Russia, has further isolated it from some Western allies. While critics accuse Viktor Orbán of being too accommodating, supporters argue that his approach prioritises national interest over geopolitical pressure.

    As Hungary approaches these pivotal elections, the outcome carries implications far beyond its borders. For many, it represents a test case in the struggle between national sovereignty and global ideological movements.

    Christian Voice calls for prayer that righteousness, truth, and justice will prevail. The direction Hungary takes will not only shape its own future but may influence the moral and political trajectory of Europe. Should it fall to policies that reject biblical truth, the consequences will be felt far wider.

    Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

    Related articles

    Georgia’s ‘foreign agents’ bill signed into law →

    Sri Lanka pro-gay NGO is foreign agent →

    Forming a Christian Voice National Affiliate →

    Ghana: Beyond foreign aid →

    Read and pray

    READ: Gen 1:27; Gen 1:27; Prov 14:34; Isa 5:20; Psalm 33:12; 2 Chron7:14; Mic 6:8; Rom 13:3; Amos 5:24.

    PRAY: Pray that righteousness will prevail in Hungary’s elections, and that leaders who uphold truth, justice, and moral order will be established.

    Pray that every ungodly influence, deception, and external manipulation seeking to undermine the nation will be exposed and brought to nothing.

    Pray that Hungary will stand firm in its sovereignty and values, resisting pressure to conform to policies that contradict truth.

    Pray that the nation will not fall into godless leadership, but remain a light that upholds what is right—for if Hungary falls, the consequences will echo far beyond its borders.

    Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    It ain’t half woke, Mum. Soldiers wearing make-up?

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0

    Army chiefs have asked male soldiers if they want to wear cosmetics and do their hair like women.

    In a move almost designed to give idiotic antichrist diversity policy in His Majesty’s Armed Forces a bad name, they are asking troops: ‘Guys, do you want to wear make-up and nail polish?’

    There’s both Bible and a good laugh in our video here on Rumble:

    Or on YouTube if you prefer. (Opens in a new tab.)

    Non-binary service personnel?

    A newspaper explains: “The consultation from Army HQ in Andover asked soldiers if they agreed ‘rules on make-up should be gender-free’, explaining, ‘this means that men, women and non-binary service personnel can all wear make-up in the same way’.”

    At a time when the Ministry of Defence could not be bothered to send a functioning warship to defend our base in Cyprus on time ahead of the US war with Iran, I’m sure you are encouraged to know the defence of the realm depends on ‘non-binary service personnel’, whatever they are.

    I wonder if our troops are going to turn out like the entertainment battery in ‘It ain’t half hot Mum’, with whom Battery Sergeant-Major Williams, played by the late Windsor Davies, was not impressed: Watch from 30seconds or click instead on our video above for the clip.

    Quit you like men, be strong

    Make-up right now is banned for men in His Majesty’s Armed Forces and they must have short hair ‘which does not reach to the collar or on to the ears’.

    Which sounds much like the Bible’s rule for the priests in the prophet Ezekiel’s word, chapter forty-four: Ezek 44:20 Neither shall they shave their heads, nor suffer their locks to grow long; they shall only poll their heads.

    Even Israel’s enemies the Philistines, terrified of Israel, said to each other: 1Sam 4:9 Be strong, and quit yourselves like men, O ye Philistines, … quit yourselves like men, and fight.

    The Apostle Paul uses the same phrase to tell the church in Corinth: 1Cor 16:13 Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.

    Which is a word to you and me in our day, as it happens. But I doubt either the Philistines or the Corinthian Christians were asking to take the afternoon off to have their hair done. There’s no gender equality in the mind of God. The prophets expect men to fight and women not to.

    The Day of the Lord is on its way

    In a judgment on Egypt concerning the Day of the Lord, the prophet Isaiah says: Isa 19:16 In that day shall Egypt be like unto women: and it shall be afraid and fear because of the shaking of the hand of the LORD of hosts, which he shaketh over it.

    You know, with an establishment like ours, in the United Kingdom, we the people should have every right to be afraid and in fear of the judgment to come.

    So join me in praying for the Lord to raise up able God-fearing honest men of truth who will proclaim the Lord Jesus and send the wokerati out of the corridors of power and, obviously, out of the armed forces.

    The diversity battalion can have their nails done in their own time.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Starmer in Munich: What he means by ‘We’ and ‘Our’

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0

    When the world’s elite use common phrases, they don’t mean what you think they mean.

    Watch this article in video format:

    First Person Plural

    Let’s take a look at Sir Keir Starmer’s Valentine’s Day message to his “lovers” at the February 2026 Munich Security Conference.

    “His lovers”? I hear you cry. Don’t worry — there’ll be some supporting scripture.

    Sir Keir went all pro-EU and anti-Brexit, and that’s what the pro-Brexit media have concentrated on. But I want to look at his use of the first-person plural — “we”, “our” and “ours” — to let you in on the Global Establishment’s world.

    Full Script of Sir Keir Starmer’s Speech to the 2026 Munich Security Conference.

    Sky’s full video of Sir Keir Starmer’s Speech to the 2026 Munich Security Conference.

    Sir Keir Starmer speaking at the Munich Security Conference 2026
    Sir Keir Starmer speaking at the Munich Security Conference 2026

    I have to set the scene. Obviously, in Western Europe, Russia is a big bogeyman, so that’s where Starmer started: “Russia has proved its appetite for aggression, bringing terrible suffering to the Ukrainian people.”

    Ah, geopolitics. It is never entirely as it seems, but that is the EU line, for sure. He went on:

    ’Our’ Social Contract

    “Its hybrid threats extend across our continent, not just threatening our security, but tearing at our social contract.”

    “Our” there does not mean yours or mine. It means theirs. It’s their continent, their security, and what they think is their social contract. Because I don’t know how the Russians could have undermined the social contract or social order of the United Kingdom any more than a succession of home-grown politicians over the last twenty-five years.

    You’ve had the Tony Blair encouragement of mass migration, the Boris wave, and now the Starmer surge.

    Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

    Migration over 19 months in office

    Illegal Migration by boat across the English Channel

    In the nineteen months since Labour came to power in July 2024, a total of 65,922 people — overwhelmingly young men, have crossed the English Channel in small boats.

    That’s nudging 850 a week, which is one and a half 581-room Britannia Canary Wharf migrant hotels. The invention of multiculturalism and the flood of Muslims has all but destroyed British society. Jewish people now go in fear of Muslim violence, and Hindus and Christians will be next on the list. That has happened on Keir Starmer’s watch. And he accuses the Russians of “tearing at our social contract”?

    He went on to accuse the Russians of: “Collaborating with populists to undermine our values. Using disinformation to sow division. Using cyber-attacks and sabotage to disrupt our lives and deepening the cost-of-living crisis.”

    It’s the Russians to blame, not us!

    Working backwards — so it’s the Russians to blame for our cost-of-living crisis. It’s nothing to do with the unscriptural tax impositions he and his Chancellor have piled on the people.

    “Using disinformation to sow division.” Division here means discussion and debate. He means nothing must compete with government propaganda. Anything contrary is “disinformation”. Well, tough, Keir, you are in the social media age now, and dissenting voices will be heard.

    Josh Simons MP is Parliamentary Secretary in the Cabinet Office (appointed 7th September 2025)
    Josh Simons MP is Parliamentary Secretary in the Cabinet Office (appointed 7th September 2025)

    So the Russians are “collaborating with populists to undermine our values.” I’ve seen no evidence to support that slur, but there is the “our” again — our values. He does not mean your values or mine. He means their values — those of the establishment.

    And he persisted with that line only days after the scandal broke where the Labour Together think tank and senior Labour figures, including Josh Simons MP, a government minister, smeared journalists with the same Russia line. (Guardian link above is worth a read!)

    ’Our’ democracy

    By the way, when you hear “our democracy” it’s the same idea. It’s their democracy, that which keeps them in power.

    And they are prepared to rip up actual democracy with legal action — in Germany, Romania, France, or in England — to try to stop elections altogether to stop populists gaining office and thereby destroying “their democracy”. Don’t expect logic, justice, truth, or coherence from them.

    You know, when ancient Israel received their covenant with God and His laws, they boasted about it, here in Deuteronomy chapter 4:

    Deut 4:8 And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous as all this law, which I set before you this day?

    Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

    “The great British values”

    So what are the values of the British establishment which are so great?

    Drag Queen Tour
    Drag Queen Story Hour ‘on tour’

    We have gay marriage, drag queen story hour, pornographic sex education, abortion on demand, puberty-blocker trials, net zero, de-industrialisation, welfarism, antisemitism, divorce on demand — none of them in any party manifesto — all just imposed on us by our leaders, leading to unrestrained sexual licence coupled with a declining population, all while harbouring the seeds of an Islamic sectarian takeover, which none of us voted for, but which would be no more than God’s righteous judgment on an elite who have chosen the ways of death.

    To be fair, Sir Keir did mention the rule of law. But even that brings to mind the two-tier justice he has encouraged, contrary to scripture, and the Muslim grooming gangs.

    Multiculturalism

    And yes, multiculturalism — which was never in a manifesto — is one of his values. He said: “True to the vibrant, free, diverse societies that we represent, showing that people who look different to each other can live peacefully together.”

    King Charles delivers his woke Christmas Message 2025
    King Charles delivers his woke Christmas Message 2025

    Tell that to the Jewish synagogue in Manchester, or the victims of the London or Manchester Arena bombings.

    He knows the population don’t agree with him, because he argued: “But this isn’t against the tenor of our times.” Increasingly, Prime Minister, it really is. And then, would you believe it — hot on the heels of the King’s Christmas message — out came “diversity is our strength” again: “Rather, it’s what makes us strong, as we’re prepared to defend it with everything that we have.”

    Are we? The Psalmist says it is unity which brings a blessing, not diversity:

    Psalm 133:1 Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!

    EU’s Values

    And what of the values of Keir’s EU audience?

    Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary
    Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary

    Last year the European Commission adopted a full LGBTIQ+ equality strategy.

    Only last week the European Parliament voted to impose trans ideology across the EU. (Read this approving article: European Parliament Votes Overwhelmingly For “The Full Recognition Of Trans Women As Women”)

    Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary, says the danger to his nation comes more from the EU now than from Russia. You can see why.

    ’We’ will need to fight

    Going all warlike, our Prime Minister vowed:“And yes, if necessary, we must be ready to fight. To do whatever it takes to protect our people, our values, and our way of life.”

    Did he say “protect our people”? When did the UK or EU elite last prioritise the people over themselves? And look, there are “our values” and “our way of life” popping up again. You know what that means now.

    I loved the “we” in “we’re prepared to defend our diversity” and “we must be ready to fight.” Be sure about this. Sir Keir and the assembled dignitaries are not going to any frontline — nor their families. So who are the “we”?

    “We” here means they expect you to go to war — and if you are a parent, to send your sons, and to our shame, your daughters, into battle to protect their values and their very comfortable way of life.

    Gen-Z reluctant to fight for Britain

    Well, a survey conducted last year by The Times in partnership with YouGov showed that only 1 in 10 of military-age Gen Z (18–27) would fight for Britain. Only two in five are proud of their country. Back in 2004, a similar survey found twice as many expressing pride.

    Hermann Goering
    Hermann Goering was LuftReichsmarschall in Nazi Germany, in charge of its air force.

    Forty-one percent of today’s Gen Z said in no circumstances would they take up arms for their country. If the Russians were landing on the beaches the response could be different, but it may well be that after Covid, Net Zero, and their failure to define a woman, Gen Z — like many of us — do not trust a word of what our current leaders say about the alleged Russian threat, or anything.

    The propaganda, which Hermann Goering famously said is all those in power need to get ordinary people to sign up, might not work any more in the social media age — of which, as we saw earlier, the ruling class are terrified.

    Sir Keir’s ‘lovers’

    So now you know the language and the mindset of the elite. And what about Sir Keir’s “lovers”? That leads to our prayer. When ancient Israel went away from the Lord, the prophet Ezekiel stressed the spiritual aspect and likened their treachery to adultery as they trusted in alliances with pagan nations:

    Ezekiel 16:33 They give gifts to all whores: but thou givest thy gifts to all thy lovers, and hirest them, that they may come unto thee on every side for thy whoredom.

    When he wrote that, it was already too late. Israel, followed by Judah, had gone into captivity. The judgment had fallen.

    Chagossians Misley Mandarin (left) and his father on Île du Coin in the Chagos Islands
    Chagossians Misley Mandarin (left) and his father in occupation (Feb 2026) on Île du Coin in the Chagos Islands

    And today, Ezekiel’s words perfectly sum up Sir Keir’s Chagos surrender, as well as giving away fishing rights to the EU, planned EU “dynamic alignment”, his kow-towing to China over their spy embassy in London, and their imprisonment of journalist Jimmy Lai.

    And the man even had the effrontery to tell the Munich elite: “And I will always fight for what’s best for my country.” (Check out our story and video on ‘Keir Starmer’s Art of the Deal‘)

    Pray for the Lord to raise up able, humble, God-fearing, honest men of truth to lead us. (Exod 18:21)

    Because unless and until our smug, self-satisfied establishment once more trust and obey the Lord Jesus — the King of kings of our Christian constitution — then our nation is finished, invaded, and it won’t be the Russians doing it.

    Ask us to come and speak at your church →

    Related articles

    Why King’s 2025 Christmas Message was ‘on-message’ →

    Keir Starmer pledges to create a role to support LGBT rights if he is PM →

    Is Keir Starmer’s Art of the Deal more sinister than we thought? →

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    ‘Common Purpose’ outed

    By
    Stephen
    -
    15
    Sir David Bell of Common Purpose - right behind Sir Brian Leveson (r)

    Sir David Bell of Common Purpose – right behind Sir Brian Leveson (r)

    The antics of a sinister left-of-centre freemasonry need consideration by those of us concerned about the elite and the quangocracy. But scripture can encourage us in our prayer.

    In November 2012, Richard Pendlebury, an investigative journalist on the Daily Mail, put together a series of articles on the activities and people behind a shadowy elitist training school called ‘Common Purpose’:

    See: Dark Arts and links with the Masters of Spin

    And: The influence of ‘people who know best’

    Also: A careful response from the Guardian

    And: A good summing up in the Telegraph

    Common Purpose runs expensive leadership courses mainly for public sector employees, largely because only the public sector can afford its fees of £5,000 for a week’s attendance.

    Richard Pendlebury

    One cannot always trust what the Daily Mail says, and in attacking those campaigning for restrictions on the press, it can be accused of fighting its own corner as the Leveson Report looms rather than exposing chicanery in high places.

    Nevertheless, Mr Pendlebury is an award-winning journalist and his articles are replete with well-researched links between personnel and based on documents and statements in the public sphere.  Chief among the people identified is Sir David Bell, a top fixer in the Leveson Enquiry and a trustee of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which falsely linked Lord McAlpine to the Wrexham paedophile scandal.  Sir David is indeed a trustee of the Common Purpose Charitable Trust, whose purpose statement claims: ‘Our educational courses give people the inspiration, skills and connections to become better leaders.’

    Common Purpose International is linked by personnel to the Common Purpose Charitable Trust and aims to establish Common Purpose operating organisations in countries outside the UK.  It says ‘All Common Purpose operating organisations aim to give leaders the inspiration, the knowledge and the connections they need to produce real change.’

    Even the Guardian’s Michael White was grudgingly appreciative of the ‘Mail’ article and Richard Pendlebury, writing: ‘Bell is a good Mail target because he’s highly visible in the octopus as a former Social Democrat party member and ex-chairman of Pearsons with links to other quango-crats named by the paper.’

    The idea of constant or nebulous ‘change’ with no qualification or explanation or what it entails is a Marxist concept within which the Common Purpose website feels right at home. Common Purpose graduates acquire skills in ‘group dynamics’ equipping them to manipulate meetings. EDI features heavily. There again, an elitism present in Common Purpose is exemplified in its constant assertion that it provides ‘connections’. Certainly its Chief Executive, Julia Middleton, has become extremely well-connected to the liberal establishment through Common Purpose.  She is director and company secretary of the Media Standards Trust, financial backers of the ‘Hacked Off” campaign and no end of feminist groups.  In 1994, she helped set up the left-of-centre think-tank Demos. Look for a comment by ‘The Trician’ about her here. She is married to the equally well-connected financier Rupert Middleton.

    Julia Middleton – ‘the best-connected woman you’ve never heard of’.

    While campaigning for transparency elsewhere, the Common Purpose website has a password-protected inner core and refuses to publish a list of its ‘graduates’.  But they include some 35,000 mainly public-sector employees, journalists, police officers – the Met spent tens of thousands of pounds on Common Purpose courses under Sir Ian Blair – and aspiring politicians.  Nor is Common Purpose any more forthcoming – or eager to comply with company law – over disclosing the home addresses of its directors. Most of them claim to live at the Common Purpose office in Banner Street, EC1.

    Common Purpose tried to blacken the name of people doing Freedom of Information searches on it, and it would not be beyond the bounds of possibility to suspect that if a group of Common Purpose graduates have the down on someone in a locality, that they could do him serious financial damage.

    The most subversive aspect of the Common Purpose mindset is the one hiding in plain sight, the concept of leading ‘beyond authority’. It is even the subject of a book by Mrs Middleton.  According to the Common Purpose website:

    ‘Many successful leaders learn to lead in roles or circumstances where they have clear authority, budget and accountability. When they move beyond this – leading peers, partners and stakeholders – the skills that brought them success may not be enough. To operate effectively they need a different approach to leadership – the ability to Lead Beyond Authority.’

    What that means is that CP people are trained to interfere in matters which are not their responsibility in order to effect the changes in policy (EDI, etc) they want to see. Even the Guardian’s Michael White is alarmed: ‘In her book Beyond Authority, Middleton – as quoted by the Mail – writes cheerfully of using “charm and flattery” to place a “conventional useful idiot” into a job which would be a “perfect smokescreen” for a chum’s agenda. Such tactics need watching.’

    The Guardian described Common Purpose as ‘well-meaning’.  But what Common Purpose plot and plan is likely to benefit themselves and their pet causes first and the rest of us and righteousness a long way second. Pray that the Lord will bring their devices to naught:

    Psalm 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.

    Matt 10:26 Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.

    Support us

    Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

    We should make clear that we welcome comments, but only from those prepared to submit a real email address.  Comments giving a false email address will go in the trash bin.

    Why King’s 2025 Christmas Message was ‘on-message’

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0
    King Charles delivers his woke Christmas Message 2025
    King Charles delivers his woke Christmas Message 2025

    I think we should take a look at King Charles’s 2025 Christmas Day message to see why he was so, as it were, ‘on-message’.

    It was King George V who delivered the first one. The present King’s great-grandfather was live on radio from Sandringham at 3pm in 1932.

    It was clever timing, encroaching neither on your grandparents’ Christmas lunch nor on a later dinner. Whole families would set aside 3pm to gather round, first the radio, then, from 1957, the television, hanging on every word of his majesty, then her majesty, and now his majesty all over again. I remember my parents doing exactly that.

    From radio to cut-away shots

    There have only been three years since when the avid listener was disappointed. There was no broadcast in 1936 following the abdication of King Edward VIII. King George VI did not give an address in 1938. In 1959 and 1963, the messages went out solely on radio, because Her Majesty was pregnant, with, respectively, Andrew and Edward.

    And in 1969 BBC bosses repeated the documentary, Royal Family, on Christmas Day, so Her Majesty issued a written message instead. But the monarch’s Christmas broadcast has been an unbroken televised tradition now since nineteen-seventy.

    In nineteen seventy-one the Queen included Andrew and Edward, then aged eleven and seven, looking at old family photos. This year, we had endless visual footage of various members of the, er, working, royal family doing things among ordinary people. There was Sophie talking to veterans, Prince William first in uniform as an RAF Wing Commander, then in an apron.

    Prov 15:33 The fear of the LORD is the instruction of wisdom; and before honour is humility.

    ’Communities’ in the plural

    And of course, fifty-six years later, as you well know, this United Kingdom is a very different place, and not just in the skill of editing in strategic cut-away shots.

    Her late majesty had no need to refer to ‘communities’, in the plural, in 1970. King Charles, on the other hand, mentioned ‘communities’ no fewer than four times this year, beating 2023’s three times.

    His first mention was a grating claim that ‘communities’ came together in the two world wars. No, Your Majesty, it was the whole nation which came together. It’s spin to force today’s language and politics into the Britain of nineteen thirty-nine.

    Psalm 133:1 A Song of degrees of David. Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!

    ’Communities came together’

    Bondi Beach Massacre targeted Jews celebrating the Hannukah festival.
    Bondi Beach Massacre targeted Jews celebrating the Hannukah festival.

    Last year, His Majesty referred to ‘anger and lawlessness in several towns’ before going on to praise ‘how communities came together’. This year, the nearness of the Heaton Park Synagogue attack and especially the Bondi Beach massacre made it inevitable that His Majesty would make reference to them.

    Both were however only in visual footage, accompanying the king’s innocuous voice-over:
    ‘to the ways in which individuals and communities display spontaneous bravery, instinctively placing themselves in harm’s way to defend others.’

    The king went on: “As I meet people of different faiths, I find it enormously encouraging to hear how much we have in common; a shared longing for peace and a deep respect for all life.”

    No ‘longing for peace’ in Islam

    Masked Muslim youths take to east London streets to 'defend our community' after police banned UKIP march to 'reclaim' the area | Daily Mail Online
    Masked Muslim youths take to east London streets to ‘defend our community’ after police banned UKIP march to ‘reclaim’ the area | Daily Mail Online

    But His Majesty’s knowledge of other faiths must tell him that the “longing for peace and a deep respect for all life” are not shared across them all. They are present in Judaism and in the Christian faith, and Christians sometimes assume they must be there in every faith.

    But the reality is, “longing for peace” and any kind of respect for human life are not part of the Mohammedan religion. They are replaced with a longing for conquest and submission and a desire for martyrdom. And those principles are now observed by 4 million of His Majesty’s subjects here in the UK.

    Prov 8:36 But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.

    And they do indeed, with their ghettos, where English, if spoken at all, is a minority language, form separate communities from the rest of us.

    Establishment propaganda

    Php 2:10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;

    So I have to say that his majesty is mis-advised. He may even be mis-advising himself, when he feels he has to paint “the great diversity of our communities” as where “we can find the strength to ensure that right triumphs over wrong.”

    Lola McEvoy, MP for Darlington UK (Labour)
    Lola McEvoy, MP for Darlington UK (Labour)

    People watching, listening, will know that is not true. It’s a non-sequitor. It reminds me of Lola McEvoy MP, after the Bondi Beach massacre, claiming: ‘Diversity is our strength’.
    The audience heard His Majesty spout the same multicultural slogan.

    It’s at best wishful thinking and at worst it’s establishment propaganda, otherwise known as ‘gaslighting’. It’s the King ‘on message’, doing politics, at odds with what a majority, now two-thirds (67%) of UK adults think, that the number of people coming into the UK is too high.

    Islam is a threat

    King Charles at Oxford Centre with a cup of tea.
    King Charles at Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, of which he is patron, with a cup of tea.

    As for the religious system they are bringing with them, in February 2024, more than half of Conservative Party members said in a poll that Islam is a threat to the British way of life.
    30% of the general public agreed.

    And that was before Bondi, before Heaton Park, before the flood of migrant sex crimes, before the hotel protests, before the Southport murders, before the General election even. Lee Anderson was still a Tory MP when that poll was commissioned by the pro-migrant Hope Not Hate.

    The elephant in the room is that two of his majesty’s ‘communities’ cannot co-exist. In his land, right now, the Jewish ‘community’ are under attack from the Muslim ‘community’, three quarters of whom believe Hamas terrorists are good guys and that there should be no state of Israel.

    Numb 24:9b Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee.

    Only Christianity preaches the blood of Jesus

    The “prayer for peace and reconciliation” his Majesty made cannot exist without the original intention of the angels’ proclamation to the shepherds, the spiritual dimension of peace and reconciliation with God in heaven. That can only come through the shed blood of the Lord Jesus, which only the Christian faith proclaims and ministers. To the Sikh ‘community’ redemption through the blood is nonsense, to the Muslim one, blasphemy.

    Romans 5:9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.

    The king’s heart is clearly for peace and happiness in his realm, but he won’t find it in the multicultural secularist belief system of the British establishment. It will only be found in the King of kings, the Lord Jesus.

    I invite you to agree with me that it is only if and when our elite proclaim the Christian faith and our Christian heritage and constitution, as exemplified in His Majesty’s coronation on 6th May 2023, that right, and truth, will triumph over wrong.

    1Cor 15:25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.

    Name the Lord Jesus!

    We pray that next year His Majesty might actually name the Lord Jesus, not refer to him obliquely as “The One who ‘came down to Earth from Heaven’, ‘whose shelter was a stable’ and who shared his life with ‘the poor and lowly’.” Because if you are not already Christian, you won’t know who he’s talking about.

    The true ‘message of Christmas’ is not family, or fellowship, or travelling, or presents. No, it’s that at a certain point in history, God, the Maker of the stars and sea, humbled himself to become one of us, a child on earth in the Lord Jesus. Without Christmas there’s no Easter. The incarnation starts the reconciliation. It’s that important.

    You know, a time is coming, and now is, when His Majesty will need to proclaim the Lord Jesus and his defining place in our nation in his Christmas broadcast, rather than allow it to descend into a cross between the BBC’s Thought for the Day, establishment propaganda and a Royal Family promo.

    1Tim 6:15 Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;

    I’m glad His Majesty concluded: “So, with these words and my whole heart, I wish you all a most peaceful and very happy Christmas.” We received that wish in our household at least.

    Prayer for the king

    1Tim 2:1 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; 2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus: 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

    I think it would be appropriate for us to pray the prayer for His Majesty found in both morning prayer and evensong in the Anglican tradition:

    O Lord our heavenly Father, high and mighty, King of kings, Lord of lords, the only Ruler of princes, who dost from thy throne behold all the dwellers upon earth; most heartily we beseech thee with thy favour to behold our most gracious Sovereign Lord, King Charles; and so replenish him with the grace of thy Holy Spirit, that he may alway incline to thy will, and walk in thy way: endue him plenteously with heavenly gifts; grant him in health and wealth long to live; strengthen him that he may vanquish and overcome all his enemies; and finally, after this life, he may attain everlasting joy and felicity; through Jesus Christ our Lord.
    Amen

    Write to King Charles

    The Bible says:
    Eccl 4:13 Better is a poor and a wise child than an old and foolish king, who will no more be admonished.

    Is His Majesty that king? If so, if he desires honour, it’s time for humility:
    Prov 15:33 The fear of the LORD is the instruction of wisdom; and before honour is humility.

    WRITE TO THE KING: ‘His Majesty The King, Buckingham Palace, London, SW1A 1AA’. You can open with ‘Sir’ (although I write: ‘May it please Your Majesty’) and close the letter with the form ‘I have the honour to be, Sir, Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servant’.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Stonewall’s Funds Dwindle Amid Backlash Over ‘Trans’ Activism

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0

    Stonewall is facing a serious financial crisis after years of aggressive activism and ideological campaigning.

    Newly published accounts show the group recorded a deficit of almost £1 million in the last financial year, as income collapsed and spending continued to outstrip resources.

    Its total reserves fell to just £91,811 by March 2025, down from nearly £1 million a year earlier. The figures show that Stonewall’s income dropped sharply from £6.9 million in 2024 to £4.7 million, while expenditure remained high at £5.6 million.

    Much of the shortfall came as public bodies and major corporations withdrew funding or declined to renew contracts, particularly those linked to Stonewall’s ‘workplace diversity schemes’.

    Fees from these programmes fell by more than £600,000 in a single year, reflecting growing institutional reluctance to be associated with the group’s agenda.

    Stop transgenderism now! →

    Political lobbying disguised as charity work

    Pro-Transgender ‘Pride Flag’ painted on a walkway at NHS Princess Royal Hospital, Orpington, England.

    Despite presenting itself as a ‘charity’, Stonewall continues to operate as a political pressure group, lobbying government departments, regulators, the NHS, and police forces to adopt contested policies on sex and gender.

    In recent years, its focus shifted decisively toward ‘trans activism’, including the promotion of ‘self-identification’ policies, ‘gender-neutral language’, and the removal of sex-based distinctions in public services.

    Stonewall’s influence extended into schools, prisons, women’s refuges, healthcare settings, and policing, often with little democratic oversight. It interventions undermined safeguarding, parental rights, freedom of belief, and sex-based protections, particularly for women and children. These concerns were frequently dismissed by the organisation as bigotry rather than addressed substantively.

    As opposition grew, including from parents, clinicians, teachers, feminists, and faith groups, Stonewall’s once-unquestioned authority began to erode. The financial consequences now visible in its accounts suggest that the public have seen Stonewall for what it truly is.

    Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    Controversies, legal risks, and public backlash

    Stonewall’s decline coincides with a broader reckoning over the consequences of policies it helped normalise. Legal cases challenging sex-based rights, safeguarding failures in schools, and NHS treatments for children with ‘gender dysphoria’ have intensified scrutiny of the ideological framework Stonewall promoted. Institutions that once relied on Stonewall guidance have found themselves exposed to litigation, regulatory intervention, and public criticism.

    Several high-profile organisations, including government departments and broadcasters have formally cut ties with Stonewall, citing concerns over neutrality and legal compliance. These departures were not symbolic; they represented a rejection of Stonewall’s assertion that its positions reflected settled law or public consensus.

    For us at Christian Voice, the financial crisis is not accidental but the result of sustained overreach. But also, in a sense, Stonewall have won. The establishment, the quangocracy, now engage in trans activism, even trying to act as if the Supreme Court ruling last April, stating that sex is biological, never took place.

    Numbers 32:23 Be sure your sin will find you out.

    What this moment reveals

    Stonewall’s financial predicament highlights the risks of allowing unelected lobby groups to shape public policy without accountability or restraint.

    For taxpayers, the episode raises serious questions about how public money is allocated and whether ideological enforcement should ever have been funded in the first place. For Christians and others concerned with truth, order, and justice, the situation underscores the consequences of abandoning moral clarity in favour of political fashion.

    As Stonewall’s resources dwindle, the wider lesson remains: movements built on coercion, ideological conformity, and the silencing of dissent rarely endure. But ‘trans’ ideology is taking a long while to die.

    “Why trans is a mental-health issue”

    For years, clinicians were trained to approach gender-related distress through careful psychological assessment, recognising it as a serious form of human suffering requiring evidence-based care. That professional framework has steadily collapsed.

    As practising psychotherapist Stella O’Malley recently wrote on Spiked Online, “what was once clearly understood as a mental-health issue has been rebranded as a matter of personal identity, beyond clinical questioning or therapeutic challenge. This shift has left families and vulnerable individuals without clear guidance at the very moment clarity is most needed.”

    Medical leadership has played a central role in this retreat. Rather than defending rigorous diagnosis and long-term risk assessment, professional bodies increasingly adopted euphemistic language, avoiding words such as “disorder” or “distress” in favour of affirming narratives. In doing so, they effectively abandoned their duty to weigh harm, risk, and irreversible outcomes. The result has been confusion, not compassion, and a clinical culture reluctant to speak honestly about long-term consequences.

    “The move away from a mental-health framework was not accidental. In 2010, international organisations such as WPATH deliberately promoted “de-psychopathologisation”, reframing gender distress as a neutral human variation rather than a condition requiring psychiatric care. Governments and health services were encouraged to follow suit. What began as an attempt to reduce stigma evolved into a wholesale rejection of mental-health language altogether,” She added.

    This redefinition has had serious consequences. By removing clinical caution, medical interventions with permanent effects were recast as routine and celebratory. Risks such as infertility, sexual dysfunction, bone density loss and chronic pain were marginalised.

    Suspect attack JD Vance home transgender Democrat donor

    US Vice-President J D Vance tells Europe's self-satisfied elite some home truths.
    US Vice-President J D Vance tells Europe’s self-satisfied elite some home truths.

    The collapse of clinical restraint has not occurred in a vacuum. Cultural narratives that frame identity as absolute and unquestionable increasingly spill into public life, sometimes with disturbing consequences.

    This was evident in the recent attack on the home of US Vice President JD Vance, allegedly carried out by a transgender-identifying individual now facing multiple criminal charges. The incident was not merely an act of vandalism, but an escalation that raised serious questions about radicalisation and grievance politics.

    The accused individual was not marginalised in the conventional sense. Reports indicate a background of considerable wealth, elite education, and political connections. This challenges the commonly repeated claim that extreme behaviour in such cases is driven solely by social exclusion or poverty. Instead, it raises the uncomfortable possibility that ideological certainty, when reinforced by institutional affirmation, can contribute to volatility rather than stability.

    Public trust erodes further when political, media and institutional leaders appear unwilling to confront this complexity. By refusing to acknowledge the role of ideology in shaping behaviour, they leave society ill-equipped to respond when belief hardens into action.

    English courts defy own ruling on trans toilets

    Campaign group calls courts’ inaction absurd as single-sex provision remains unenforced
    Campaign group calls courts’ inaction absurd as single-sex provision remains unenforced

    Nowhere is institutional confusion more evident than in the response of English courts to their own legal rulings.

    Despite a landmark Supreme Court judgment clarifying that “sex” in the Equality Act refers to biological sex, court authorities have continued to allow biological males into women’s toilets. This refusal to implement settled law has alarmed campaigners and undermined confidence in the justice system’s impartiality.

    The courts’ explanation that they are awaiting further guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission has only deepened concern. The EHRC itself has stated that public bodies are expected to follow the law as it stands, not delay compliance indefinitely. That the courts, of all institutions, appear to be defying legal clarity has been described as both absurd and dangerous.

    Women’s rights advocates warn that this reluctance to act places women at risk, particularly in enclosed and vulnerable spaces. The issue is not abstract. It concerns safety, dignity, and the principle that legal rulings should be applied consistently, not selectively. When law is treated as optional, public confidence fractures.

    This episode reflects a broader failure of leadership. Ideological pressure has overridden legal duty, leaving taxpayers to fund institutions that refuse to uphold their own rules.

    Related Story

    GCHQ abandons Stonewall →

    Royal College of Psychiatrists cut ties with Stonewall →

    Schools defy ministers: children ‘change gender’ without parental knowledge →

    Mother banned from seeing sex-ed materials →

    Costa promotes mutilation as Government
    delays schools “transgender” guidance →

    NHS bans puberty blockers for children →

    UK in disarray over “puberty blockers” →

    Who Are The Trans Activists Influencing British Schools, Sports and the NHS? →

    Read and pray

    READ: Isa 5:20; Prov 31:8–9; Matt 6:24; Rom 1:18-32, Gala 6:7; Jhn 1:5.

    PRAY: Thank God for opening the eyes of organisations who have chosen to withdraw funding.
    Pray that God will continue to expose lobby groups disguised as charity.
    Pray for the protection of children and the restoration of moral boundaries.

    Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

     

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

    UK Ends Anti-FGM Aid Programme

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0
    Ending Government funding for FGM prevention programme
    Ending Government funding for FGM prevention programme

    Ending Government funding for FGM prevention programme
    Government to halt funding for FGM prevention programme

    Britain’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has confirmed that it will end funding for its flagship anti-female genital mutilation programme, The Girl Generation – Africa-Led Movement to End FGM, by October 2026.

    The decision follows wider cuts to overseas aid and brings to a close a scheme launched in 2014 amid much moral self-congratulation.

    It is important to state plainly what this is and what it is not. The ending of this programme is a matter of fact, not necessarily a humanitarian disaster.

    Despite years of funding, publicity, and NGO activity, there is no clear, independently verified evidence that the programme has significantly reduced FGM anywhere. Its work has focused largely on messaging, advocacy, and “norms change”, rather than enforcement of law or measurable protection of girls.

    Christian Voice has long warned that foreign aid often entrenches dependency, fosters corruption, enriches intermediaries, and exports Western secular assumptions under the guise of compassion.

    1 Samuel 16:7 For the Lord seeth not as man seeth.

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    FGM suvivor responds

    Nimco Ali OBE, an FGM survivor who co-founded The Five Foundation and former government advisor on women and girls, wrote in 2023 that too little of Britain’s aid was making it to those in need.

    “I am on the frontline of the work the Foreign Office says it funds and I can tell you UK aid funding to ‘help end female genital mutilation’ (FGM) has no evidence that a penny given has actually saved a girl from FGM,” she wrote in the Evening Standard.

    “It is really hard for me to say this because I am a supporter of UK aid, but the truth is what we give has never truly achieved what it could.”

    Ms Ali instead advocates for funding to be given directly to grass-roots organisations on the ground, who know best how to tackle the problem.

    Meanwhile, Sarah Champion, Chair of the International Development Committee and Sarah Owen, Chair of the Women and Equalities Committee, wrote to Baroness Chapman, the Minister of Development, arguing that cutting the funding would put women’s lives at risk.

    The letter, made available to The Telegraph, said: “Ending the funding for such crucial work tracking FGM presents a serious risk to women and girls globally [and] compromises the safety of women and girls in the UK, who remain at risk of being taken abroad to undergo FGM.” 

    Aid, activism and the iIlusion of moral authority

    The Girl Generation exemplifies many of the problems inherent in modern foreign aid. Vast sums are channelled through international agencies and consultancies, producing reports, conferences, and careers, while outcomes remain vague and unverifiable.

    Where progress against FGM has occurred, it has more often been driven by local law enforcement, education, and religious teaching not Western branding exercises.

    Yet such programmes allow British elites to posture as moral instructors to other nations. The aid cheque becomes a sermon, and Britain casts itself as enlightened while others are portrayed as barbaric.
    Romans 2:21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself?

    Ask us to come and speak at your church →

    What does Britain actually stand for?

    Imagine British officials lecturing African communities about genital abuse, only to be asked a simple question: Is the UK pro-sodomy? Pro-abortion? Pro-transgender ideology?

    The question would not be unfair. Britain has aggressively promoted sexual libertinism, abortion, and gender confusion through diplomacy, education policy, and international pressure. These are not neutral exports. They are moral claims and profoundly anti-Christian ones.

    James 1:8 A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

    The contradiction is stark. Britain condemns one set of cultural practices abroad while aggressively advancing others at home that undermine sexual morality, family life, and the created order.

    From preaching against FGM to practising it at home

    The gravest hypocrisy lies closer to home. While FGM remains illegal in the UK, the NHS itself is now involved in practices that meet the moral definition of genital mutilation, even if rebranded with sanitised language.

    So-called “gender affirmation” surgeries involve the irreversible alteration or removal of healthy sexual organs.

    Puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones damage fertility and sexual function. These are not fringe practices but are increasingly embedded within NHS policy.

    Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.

    Britain lectures other cultures on protecting girls, while authorising medical harm to children in its own hospitals.

    NHS ideology enforced, conscience suppressed

    This moral inversion is enforced institutionally. NHS trusts now require staff to affirm gender ideology or face disciplinary action. Biological reality is treated as optional, while dissent is pathologised. Even court rulings affirming the law are resisted by activist lobbies determined to override sex-based protections.

    Romans 12:2 Be not conformed to this world.

    The NHS, once a place of care, is increasingly a vehicle for ideological enforcement — particularly where children are concerned.

    A broader elite corruption of truth and the body

    This is not an isolated issue. Across law, education, and healthcare, Britain’s ruling class has abandoned Christian moral foundations in favour of expressive individualism. Pornography is normalised.

    Promiscuity is taught. Abortion is celebrated. Sexual difference is denied. Against this backdrop, lectures about FGM ring hollow.

    Psalm 2:4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh.

    The problem is not that Britain has ended an aid programme. The problem is that Britain has lost the moral coherence required to speak credibly about bodily harm at all.

    No moral leg to stand on

    The end of the anti-FGM programme merely exposes a deeper truth. Britain’s elites cannot claim the mantle of moral leadership while promoting sexual chaos, mutilation, and confusion at home. Aid cannot substitute for righteousness, and slogans cannot replace truth.

    Proverbs 23:23 Buy the truth, and sell it not.

    For Christians, the task is clear: reject the false moralism of the age, defend the created order, protect children from all forms of abuse — whether practised in villages abroad or hospitals at home — and speak the truth without fear or compromise.

    Related stories

    NHS: Taxpayer Millions Fund Mutilation →

    NHS to appoint ‘senior fellow’ to encourage Female Genital Mutilation →

    Mutilation ruins girl’s life →

    Tavistock to Face Legal Action →

    Ofcom: “Broadcasters must call men women →

    Read and pray

    READ: Psalm 100:3; Prov 12:22; Prov 29:2; Eccl 12:14; Isa 5:20; Micah 3:2; Matt 18:6; Acts 5:29; Rom 2:1; 1 Corinth 6:19–20; Gal 6:7; Eph 6:13.
    PRAY: For repentance among our leaders

    Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    How mixed-sex changing rooms are putting women at needless risk

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0

    In a culture increasingly hostile to God-ordained distinctions between male and female, the erosion of women’s protected spaces has become a predictable tragedy.

    Newly released police statistics from England and Wales expose the cost of such ideological folly. At least 16 rapes, 80 sexual assaults, and 65 acts of voyeurism took place in mixed-sex changing rooms in 2023.

    When women’s private spaces are opened to any man who simply asserts he belongs there, wicked men exploit the opportunity.

    This should surprise no sober-minded person. Yet, according to research from the Women’s Rights Network, up to a third of Britain’s leisure centres now maintain changing rooms “open to everyone,” thereby placing women and girls in needless jeopardy.

    Scripture teaches clearly that: A brother must not see his sister’s nakedness, likewise a sister must not see her brother’s nakedness. Such exposure is called wickedness and iniquity.

    Leviticus 18:9 The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.

    Ephesians 5:11 Have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    The law allows protection, yet ideology discourages It

    British law does not forbid single-sex changing facilities; indeed, when a space is labelled women-only, biological males must legally be excluded. But because institutions seek the praise of a secular culture intoxicated with gender confusion, many avoid creating single-sex provision altogether, opting instead for “gender-neutral” facilities to appear compliant with fashionable dogma.

    The consequences are clear: in 2023, an average of three crimes per week were committed against women and girls in these mixed-sex spaces. Disturbingly, in nearly five per cent of cases, the perpetrator was a male staff member—the very people women might reasonably expect to trust.

    Exodus 20:26 Neither shalt thou go up by steps unto mine altar, that thy nakedness be not discovered thereon.

    Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.

    Ask us to come and speak at your church →

    The human toll: Fear, violation, and withdrawal

    The testimonies of victims reveal the deep emotional and spiritual harm produced by this reckless social experiment.

    One teenage girl assaulted in a shower room admits that the scent of chlorine now triggers physical panic. Another woman, secretly filmed while undressed, fears that images of her naked body may now circulate online.

    In 2024, two men were convicted of covertly filming more than 6,000 individuals, including children, across London and the south, trading those images on the internet. Women who simply wanted to swim or exercise now speak of abandoning these activities altogether, feeling disgraced and unprotected.

    This is what happens when society refuses to guard the vulnerable.

    John 10:10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy.

    A crisis of trust and a culture of denial

    According to the Women’s Rights Network, reported cases likely represent only a fraction of the real problem. Many victims no longer trust the police—relationships strained by years of poor handling of sexual-abuse cases.

    Even when incidents are recorded, police data is often compromised by ideological pressure: officers frequently fail, or refuse, to list trans-identified offenders as biologically male. Thus, crimes committed by men are sometimes misleadingly categorised as “woman-on-woman” assaults.

    A culture that prefers a comforting lie to an uncomfortable truth cannot properly protect its citizens.

    Isaiah 59:14 Justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street.

    The moral mandate to restore single-Sex spaces

    A group of nurses from County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust (CDDFT) have lodged an employment tribunal case for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment.
    A group of nurses from County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust (CDDFT) have lodged an employment tribunal case for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment.

    Women who speak up for their dignity increasingly face institutional retaliation. Nurse Sandie Peggie, with 30 years of NHS experience, was suspended after objecting to sharing facilities with a male doctor while dealing with menstruation.

    Likewise, Eight Darlington nurses, were disciplined for expressing concerns about a biological male in their changing room—even though one of them was a prior victim of sexual abuse. They were told to “re-educate” themselves. This is not compassion. It is coercion.

    It is not bigotry to insist upon the preservation of single-sex spaces, it is the minimum a just society owes women in terms of safety, privacy, and dignity. A culture that asks women to swallow fear in order to placate confused or predatory men has lost its moral bearings.

    Christians and all who value truth must champion rightful boundaries, speak plainly about biological reality, and defend the vulnerable without apology.

    A society that abandons women to appease ideology is a society already in moral decline.

    Psalm 82:4 Deliver the weak and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked.

    Related stories

    Who is defying the Supreme Court’s biological realities ? →

    The promiscuous, predatory world of male homosexuality →

    “Police should not march with pride” →

    ‘Homosexuality genetic’? Not again! →

    Pussy Riot jailed & Moscow bans gay parades →

    Ofcom: “Broadcasters must call men women” →

    “Police should not march with pride” →

    Read and pray

    READ: Gen 1:27; Deut 30:19; Josh 7:10-11; Isaiah 58:1; Prov 14:34; 29:25; Matt 9:12; Mark 12:30-31; Ephesians 6:4; 1 Corinth 1:28; James 1:5-29

    PRAY: Thank God for His holy standards and moral law.
    Pray for purity in homes and families.
    Pray for family leaders (parents and guardians).
    Pray against silence and compromise among leaders.

    Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    ‘Britain is a Christian nation’ teacher sacked

    By
    Stephen
    -
    2
    His Majesty King Charles III kisses the Bible at his Coronation in May 2023
    His Majesty King Charles III kisses the Bible at his Coronation in May 2023

    A teacher in London has been sacked for telling Muslim children that Britain is a Christian country. He also told the boys off for washing their feet in the hand wash basins in the toilets (‘restroom’ if you’re American).

    He told them: ‘Britain is still a Christian state’ and observed that the King is head of the Church of England. Well, it seems you can’t have that going on in England’s capital city with its British values of democracy, the rule of law, liberty, respect and tolerance.

    So the school suspended the teacher in March twenty-twenty-four, then sacked him.

    Origin of ‘Safeguarding Boards’

    A month later he was referred to a ‘safeguarding board’ as well as to the Metropolitan Police, for an alleged hate crime. The Met’s child abuse investigation team even became involved.

    The safeguarding officer concluded the teacher had made hurtful comments about Islam and that a child had been subject to emotional harm. The teacher succeeded in appealing the ban but remained sacked. Thank God the police dropped their inquiry.

    Did you know ‘Safeguarding Boards’ were set up in two thousand and four after the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in Soham by Ian Huntley, the school caretaker, to protect children from dangers posed by adults working with or around them.

    Children ‘safe’ from truth

    It has not taken long, has it, for ‘safeguarding’ to be used by woke activists in teaching and sport, against Christians and anyone else whose views do not align with their own Islamo-left or secularist view.

    Those in power must keep children ‘safe’ from truth to protect their multicultural antichrist ideology. Because the truth here is that the United Kingdom is constitutionally Christian.

    His Majesty King Charles III kisses the Bible at his Coronation in May 2023
    His Majesty King Charles III kisses the Bible at his Coronation in May 2023

    During his coronation on 6th May twenty-twenty-three, King Charles was anointed by the Archbishop to rule as a Christian monarch, just as Zadok the priest anointed king Solomon in the Bible:

    1Kings 1:39a And Zadok the priest took an horn of oil out of the tabernacle, and anointed Solomon.

    The king kissed the Holy Bible, and made solemn promises to maintain the laws of God in his realm as well as the true profession of the Gospel.

    ’Wudu’ ritual of feet-washing

    From ‘wudumate.com’

    This washing the Muslim boys were doing is a religious requirement, by the way.
    Muslims are commanded by the Quran in Surah 5 verse 6 to wash their feet as part of the ‘wudu’ ritual. So they wash them in the sink:

    Koran, Surah 5 v 6: O ye who believe! when ye prepare for prayer, wash your faces, and your hands (and arms) to the elbows; Rub your heads (with water); and (wash) your feet to the ankles. If ye are in a state of ceremonial impurity, bathe your whole body. (Yusuf Ali’s translation.)

    Did you know Muslim boys were doing this in British state schools? It’s a ritual cleansing done before prayer to gain spiritual and physical purity. It’ll take more than that, guys. Whoever you are, it’ll take turning to Jesus for your sins to be forgiven.

    As it is written:
    1John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

    Christianity largest group

    The United Kingdom may be constitutionally Christian, and have a long Christian heritage, dating back 1500 years or even longer, but what about current demographics?

    In the 2021 census, 46.2% of the population declared themselves Christian in England & Wales, not including Scotland and Northern Ireland, but down from 59.3% in twenty-eleven.

    Those of ‘no religion’ were up to 37.2% and Muslims were 6.5%, up from 4.9% in 2011, a thirty-two per-cent increase over ten years.

    So Christians are still the largest group, Muslims are growing, and there is a sizeable proportion looking for a spiritual home.

    Father banned from football coaching

    Jamie Michael (acknowledgements to Free Speech Union)
    Jamie Michael (acknowledgements to Free Speech Union)

    But this story comes as Jamie Michael, who served with the Royal Marines in the invasion of Iraq in 2003, was reported banned as a football youth coach in the Rhondda Valley for an online post he made after the murders of three children in Southport in July 2024.

    Mr Michael posted a 12-minute video in which he said illegal immigrants have ‘the numbers to take over’ the country. He denounced ‘scumbags’ and ‘psychopaths’ and warned the country was ‘under attack’. Mr Michael, a father aged 47, was charged with inciting racial hatred.

    At his trial, the veteran said the targets for his criticism had been Southport killer Axel Rudakubana and ‘illegal, unchecked or radicalised immigrants’. He was unanimously cleared by the jury after just 17 minutes.

    But after his acquittal, you just know the local safeguarding board will spring into action. They banned him from working with children for his completely lawful video warning. Jamie Michael is suing both the safeguarding board and the Football Association of Wales for £25,000 in damages.

    School has a ‘prayer-room

    The teacher in our story is now suing the local authority. His lawyers point out the school was non-faith and that prayers had been informally banned from the playground and confined to a prayer room set aside for the purpose.

    So it emerges that state schools in this United Kingdom have set aside prayer rooms, not for Christians, but for Muslims. Was that in any party manifesto?

    It’s almost as if His Majesty’s Government, our elite, our teaching establishment and civil servants, are ashamed of our Christian heritage and are quietly working against it, without telling you, isn’t it?

    Pray for them to repent and return to the Christ of our Christian constitution. Pray the Lord will raise up able, truthful, honest, humble, God-fearing men who are up to that challenge:
    Exo 18:21 Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness;

    It is written:
    Psalm 33:12a Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD;

    Sign our petition below.

    Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

    Use this UK Parliament link to email your MP →

    Previous Articles

    Why do NHS staff hate our flags? →

    Civil Service funds 500 diversity jobs →

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Why do NHS staff hate our flags?

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0

    On Remembrance Day, 11th November 2025, I read that St George’s flags are creating “no-go zones” for NHS staff.

    The Daily Telegraph reported ‘several NHS trust chief executives and leaders’ claiming that staff feel ‘intimidated by the presence of the flags across the country, including when they are visiting people in their own homes to give them treatment’.

    OK, that may be reflecting no more than their own preconceptions and prejudices, because a poll of senior managers found 77 per cent, over three quarters of them, concerned, they said, about discrimination towards NHS staff from patients and the public.

    Antisemitism of NHS staff

    Evil: Dr Rahmeh Aladwan cannot stop her Islam-mandated hatred of Jews.
    Evil: Dr Rahmeh Aladwan cannot stop her Islam-mandated hatred of Jews.

    They don’t seem concerned about discrimination from NHS staff towards patients and the public, do they? I don’t notice any condemnation or even recognition of the discrimination and antisemitism on open display from Muslim doctors, nurses and staff wearing ‘free palestine’ badges. (See Surgeon struck off. Doctor Suspended. Nurse ‘antisemitic’. PostScript 28/11/25: Dr Rahmeh Aladwan has now been struck off, but only for 15 months, and promptly went on another antisemitic rant.)

    Anyway, one trust leader, speaking anonymously, said there were particular difficulties for staff working in the community.

    He or she said: “We saw during the time when the flags went up – our staff, who are a large minority of black and Asian staff, feeling deliberately intimidated.

    “It felt like the flags were up creating no go zones. That’s what it felt like to them.”

    Oppose Islamophobia Definition →

    Spiritual problem with flags

    Well, anonymous trust leader probably thinks he or she is making an argument against the display of our national and union flags. But in fact, he or she is actually saying that these foreign, or even UK-born, staff do not feel any affection to this host nation.

    That they hate or despise, or feel uncomfortable with, British national symbols.

    Or are they associating them with protests against current levels of illegal Muslim migration? It is that connection by which these staff feel ‘deliberately intimidated’? In which case this might not be so much of a racial problem with our flags as a religious one, a spiritual one even.

    Could it be it is Muslim staff who feel the most uncomfortable with a flag with the cross of Jesus Christ, the King of kings, on it?

    Christian heritage & constitution

    That flag and the Union flag remind us of our Christian heritage, our Christian constitution, our historical background as a Christian nation. All of that is what we, that is all of us, should respect and honour.

    It’s just like what the Bible says about the Jewish Passover:
    Exod 12:14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.

    You see how a nation has to know where it has come from.

    The prophet Joel says this about a significant day:
    Joel 1:3 Tell ye your children of it, and let your children tell their children, and their children another generation.

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    No cohesion

    King Charles lays a wreath in a Christian service at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday
    King Charles lays a wreath in a Christian service at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday

    That’s why we have Remembrance Sunday and Remembrance Day. The clue to the purpose of it is in the name.

    And I venture that few of those who don’t care for our flags with the cross on them were found at a local remembrance Sunday service, or tuning in to watch the ceremony at the Cenotaph.

    No nation can long survive if the people within it do not remember, honour and respect, even love, its heritage, its cultural symbols. There is no cohesion in a nation with a significant proportion of the population half-in-half-out.

    Especially is there no cohesion in a nation wherein lie a significant proportion of the population who want to impose an alien faith and political system.

    Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

    No-go zone for Jews

    Jews were segregated in the face of Muslim intimidation at Villa Park
    Jews were segregated in the face of Muslim aggression at Villa Park

    And if an NHS trust leader voices concerns about ‘No-Go Zones’, what about the Muslim majority one around Villa Park Football Ground, which a football match has revealed is a no-go zone for Jews and those standing with them.

    Going back to the NHS and both its staff and its staffing, obviously the nation’s health service should be training indigenous staff. I won’t go all holy and say that’s ‘wisdom’ but it’s surely common sense.

    But there is obviously a problem which NHS trust leaders have identified with Muslim staff in this Christian nation which may turn up the very Jewish people their religion commands them to hate and destroy as patients.

    Ask us to come and speak at your church →

    Elite must turn to the Lord

    So given that, and their disaffection with our nation and its Christian heritage, is it not looking increasingly as if this is their time to leave?

    Pray into that, and pray for your MP, our king and those who bear rule in his name. May the Lord open their spiritual eyes to see this challenge as God sees it.

    Scripture says:
    Isa 42:8 I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.

    Our elite must turn back to him who alone can save us.

    READ: Psalm 9:17, 33:12; Isa 9:6-7; Dan 7:13-14; Matt 2:11; 1Cor 15:25; Eph 1:20-21; 1Tim 2:5, 6:5,13-15; Heb 1:3-4; Rev 1:5, 17:14, 19:11-16.

    Use this UK Parliament link to email your MP →

    Previous Articles

    Charles: Synagogue Attack ‘Out of the Blue’? →

    Grooming Gangs Inquiry Stitch-up →

    Jewish fans banned from Villa Park →

    Muslims slaughter Christians in Nigeria →

    UK elite promoted antisemitism →

    How the BBC promoted Islamic State →

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Why Is the Civil Service Funding Over 500 Diversity Officers?

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0
    Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity (EDI) | Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
    Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity (EDI) | Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

    As Britain faces mounting economic pressures, revelations now show that over 500 civil servants are employed across Government to police and expand Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) frameworks.These roles have doubled in some departments since Labour took power.

    This surge, uncovered only after a two-year struggle for transparency by MP Neil O’Brien, raises sobering questions about national priorities. Rather than strengthening families, communities or national cohesion, resources appear to be funnelled into ideological administration.

    It also follows earlier controversies, such as the 2022 revelation that Whitehall spent over £200,000 on unconscious-bias training shortly before scrapping it for being ineffective, and the 2021 backlash over civil service “gender-neutral language” directives that even ministers claimed were unnecessary distractions. What a waste of taxpayers money!

    Year after year, the same pattern emerges, the machinery of Government grows increasingly devoted to cultural doctrines rather than practical reforms.

    Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    The Rising Cost Of Ideology

    The Ministry of Defence alone now employs 77 DEI-themed staff, while the Cabinet Office’s “Office for Equality and Opportunity” has risen from 28 to 180 employees in just one year.

    Across Whitehall, verified numbers reach at least 510 DEI posts, amounting to a minimum annual salary cost of £28.1 million, not counting compliance work placed upon other civil servants.

    At a time when families struggle to heat their homes, ministers are expanding offices that generate more paperwork than practical benefit.

    This echoes earlier concerns raised during the pandemic, when frontline workers complained that resources were being spent on administrative restructuring rather than essential service delivery.

    The growing divide between institutional priorities and public realities has become increasingly difficult to ignore.

    Matthew 6:21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

    Stop transgenderism now! →

    Opposition Forced To Dig For Truth

    Conservative Party politician who has been the Member of Parliament for Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
    Neil O’Brien, Conservative Party politician who has been the Member of Parliament for Harborough, Oadby and Wigston

    Neil O’Brien’s effort to uncover these figures met repeated obstruction, with some departments refusing to answer questions they had answered under the previous Government.

    The Ministry of Justice and DEFRA claimed the information was “not held centrally”, a justification that even parliamentary advisors reportedly viewed as highly implausible.

    This lack of transparency fuels public mistrust and raises concerns about what else lies hidden behind bureaucratic walls.

    It mirrors past battles—such as the long-delayed release of data on police diversity spending in 2020, or the attempt to withhold internal guidance on school gender policies in 2021. The pattern is clear: when ideology takes root, openness often withers.

    John 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light… lest his deeds should be reproved.

    Ask us to come and speak at your church →

    Taxpayers Made To Shoulder The Burden

    Chancellor Rachel Reeves prepares to raise taxes again, claiming necessity. Yet within Government itself, DEI staffing expands relentlessly.

    This creates double taxation: once for salaries, and again for the administrative burden DEI policy imposes on ordinary workers.

    Mr. O’Brien warns that these “woke diversity jobs” operate as ideological engines rather than public service roles, driving up national costs while doing little to support the struggling British household.

    This financial strain reflects earlier periods—such as the post-2008 austerity era—when ordinary families bore the brunt of government mismanagement. Today, many feel history is repeating itself, only now under the banner of equality rhetoric.

    Proverbs 27:23 Be thou diligent to know the state of thy flocks, and look well to thy herds.

    The Moral Responsibility Of Government

    A government source defended the DEI expansion, citing policies addressing women’s safety, disability inclusion and workplace inequality.

    Yet the broader concern remains: is the nation investing in genuine support or ideological machinery?

    Britain’s working families, already burdened by rising costs, deserve a government focused on strengthening the moral, economic and spiritual foundations of society—not multiplying administrative structures whose outcomes remain unclear.

    Past warnings from church leaders, community advocates and even former civil servants—have repeatedly stressed that a nation drifts when its institutions become detached from the real needs of its people.

    As historic crises have shown, from the industrial decline of the 1980s to the family breakdown concerns highlighted by the 2011 riots review, a society that sacrifices foundational truths in pursuit of passing ideologies soon finds itself weakened.

    Psalm 11:3 If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?

    Related Articles

    Labour’s Winter Fuel Raid Costs Taxpayers £400m →

    Who Are The Trans Activists Influencing British Schools, Sports and the NHS? →

    Tory Leadership: Do any of the candidates do God? →

    Read and pray

    READ: Joshua 24:15; 2 Chron 7:14; Isa 1:26; Psalm 11:3; Prov 11:14; Prov 14:34; James 1:5.

    PRAY: Pray for national repentance and restoration
    Pray gainst wasteful stewardship and misuse of public funds
    Pray for wisdom for leaders and policymakers

    Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Who Are The Trans Activists Influencing British Schools, Sports and the NHS?

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0
    Gendered Intelligence training to promote woke ideologies within the work space and schools. Credit: Gendered.
    Gendered Intelligence training to promote woke ideologies within the work space and schools. Credit: Gendered.
    Gendered Intelligence has delivered almost 400 training sessions to over 9,300 people across 135 organisations Credit: Gendered Intelligence
    Gendered Intelligence has delivered almost 400 training sessions to over 9,300 people across 135 organisations Credit: Gendered Intelligence

    Across Britain, schools, hospitals, and even sports bodies are quietly being seduced by a group of networks promoting transgenderism.

    Behind the slogans of “inclusion” and “diversity” lies a movement that has infiltrated the public sector, rewriting long-held definitions of truth, biology, and morality. From the NHS to the classroom, no institution seems untouched by its influence.

    This movement has gained legitimacy through official partnerships, public funding, and a network of advocacy groups presenting themselves as experts in gender identity. One of the most prominent among them is Telegraph, a charity that has become a trusted adviser to government departments, councils, and national charities.

    Many Christian educators, doctors, and parents have found themselves pressured to affirm ideas that conflict with both science and Scripture.

    2 Timothy 4:3 The time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    A Teacher’s Encounter With the New Orthodoxy

    As reported on the Telegraph: When South London PE teacher Harriet saw a “Trans Inclusion in Sport” webinar promoted by England Athletics, she expected practical advice about supporting pupils sensitively and safely.

    A teenage girl on her team had recently begun identifying as male, and Harriet wanted to ensure she could protect the pupil’s wellbeing while maintaining fairness in sport.

    But the session left her alarmed. “I went in open-minded,” she explained, “but came away feeling that it was short on facts and long on ideology.” The training insisted that the physical advantage of male bodies was “overstated,” and that questioning such claims amounted to harm.

    Participants were told that “free speech against trans people” was not acceptable, a chilling reminder of how debate is being replaced by dogma. When Harriet privately asked how to keep her female student safe in boys’ teams, the presenter accused her of “assuming gender stereotypes.”

    After years of teaching both boys and girls, Ms.Harriet knew the physical realities could not be ignored. But under this new orthodoxy, truth no longer matters; affirmation has become the ultimate virtue.

    Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter

    Stop transgenderism now! →

    The Money Behind the Movement

    The rapid rise of Gendered Intelligence has been fuelled by money, lots of it. The organisation, which only gained charity status in 2019, now commands up to £2,215 for a single-day training course. In 2023–24 alone, its training sessions generated more than £250,000 in revenue, a sharp increase from previous years.

    Public grants have also poured in. The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, and the Sainsbury family’s Three Guineas Trust have each contributed hundreds of thousands of pounds. (We recognise these names as promoting other anti-Christian activist NGOs.) By 2024, Gendered Intelligence’s annual income had more than doubled since 2019, with substantial sums coming directly from government contracts.

    At a time when ordinary Britons struggle with the cost of living, taxpayers are unknowingly funding an ideology that undermines science and faith. While the NHS waits grow longer, funds are quietly diverted into “diversity” projects that prioritise ideology over patient care.

    The question must be asked: how did we get to a point where those who question this spending are branded as bigots, while those profiting from confusion are rewarded as heroes?

    Eph 5:11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.

    The NHS and the Affirmation Agenda

    Gendered Intelligence’s role within the NHS has sparked outrage among medical professionals. Former clinicians from the Tavistock Gender Identity Development Service have accused the charity of promoting an “affirmation-only” model, encouraging young patients to transition without due psychological assessment or caution.

    This approach can easily lock vulnerable children into life-altering medical interventions. Rather than helping them explore the roots of their distress, activists have turned the NHS into a conveyor belt of affirmation.

    Dr. Hillary Cass, British honorary physician in paediatrics.
    Dr. Hillary Cass, British honorary physician in paediatrics.

    The Cass Review’s findings earlier this year confirmed that many such practices were unsafe, prompting the closure of the Tavistock clinic.

    Despite this, Gendered Intelligence continues to present itself as an expert advisor on “best practice.” The irony is painful: the very ideology that has harmed children’s mental health now claims to be their saviour.

    But ‘Gendered Intelligence’ makes no secret of its intentions. Its website says: ‘Gendered Intelligence is a trans-led and trans-involving charity that works to increase understandings of gender diversity and improve the lives of trans people.’ That’s clear enough. It’s not impartial, it’s a trans-promoting mob of partisan activists.

    ‘Charlie Kye’ Trustee of Gendered Intelligence. Stated pronouns ‘she/her’, since you ask.

    Its ‘Meet the Team’ page has everyone referred to by first name (or invented first name) only, as in ‘trustees’: ‘Charlie’, ‘James’, ‘Skip’ and ‘Stone’.

    The Charity Commission website along with Companies House identifies two of them as Charlie Kye and James Ramsay William Osborne. The latter is also a trustee and director of ‘STAR: Student Action for Refugees’ (‘Refugees Welcome Here’) and has been a director of a climate change outfit. It would no surprise to find people adopting a fairly hard-left anti-Christian BBC-style stance all through ‘Gendered Intelligence’.

    Christians and parents alike must stand watch. When truth is replaced by affirmation and care replaced by compliance, we must speak boldly for the innocent.

    Jer 6:14 3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy…Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked.

    The Ideology Enters Sport

    From classrooms to locker rooms, the reach of this movement has been astonishing. Gendered Intelligence has advised the England and Wales Cricket Board, World Rugby, and British Gymnastics — all in the name of inclusion. But inclusion for whom?

    As campaigners like Sex Matters director Fiona McAnena have warned, the organisation’s fingerprints are “all over sports policies” that undermine women’s safety. Even Sport England reportedly paid the charity to produce guidance that encouraged mixed changing facilities, guidance that ignored women’s concerns altogether.

    Under this guidance, biological males identifying as women are permitted in female categories, changing rooms, and competitions. The cost to fairness, privacy, and security is staggering. Once again, the rights of the majority have been sacrificed to appease a vocal minority.

    In a nation once proud of defending women and children, we now risk institutionalising their erasure.

    Isa 3:12 Isaiah 3:12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

    Girlguiding and the Loss of Safeguarding

    Even Girlguiding, once a beacon of moral leadership, has fallen under activist sway. Gendered Intelligence helped draft its “trans inclusion” policy — a document now facing legal challenge from a concerned parent who claims her daughter’s safety was compromised.

    The policy allows biological males identifying as girls to share sleeping quarters, bathrooms, and changing areas with young female members. Girlguiding’s leadership insists the rules are “lawful,” but legality is not the same as morality. Scripture reminds us that what is ‘lawful’ in the eyes of fallen man is not always right in the sight of God.

    Isa 55:8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither your ways my ways, saith the LORD. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.

    Such policies have created confusion and fear among parents, many of whom now question whether long-trusted organisations are safe spaces for their daughters. This is not progress — it is a moral regression cloaked in rainbow rhetoric.

    In the name of equality, innocence is being surrendered. The Church must stand as a shield for those who cannot yet defend themselves.

    Matt 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

    The Silence of Our Institutions

    While major public bodies are distancing themselves from Stonewall’s Diversity Champions Scheme, Gendered Intelligence has quietly stepped in to fill the void. With universities, councils, and broadcasters desperate to appear progressive, its influence has only grown stronger.

    The BBC, Ofcom, and Channel 4 are among those eager to show their allegiance to “diversity and inclusion.” Yet what they truly display is moral cowardice — a refusal to defend truth when it becomes unpopular. The gospel of tolerance has replaced the Gospel of Christ.

    Christian parents, teachers, and doctors now face increasing pressure to conform or stay silent. Those who hold to biblical truth about creation, gender, and family risk losing their jobs or facing public shame.

    We must remember that light shines brightest in darkness. Silence is not an option when truth itself is under siege.

    Eph 6:13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

    Related Story

    Schools defy ministers: children ‘change gender’ without parental knowledge →

    Mother banned from seeing sex-ed materials →

    Costa promotes mutilation as Government
    delays schools “transgender” guidance →

    NHS bans puberty blockers for children →

    UK in disarray over “puberty blockers” →

    Tavistock to Face Legal Action →

    Read and pray

    READ:

    Isa 5:20, Isa 59:14–15; Prov 31:8–9; Matt 6:24; Rom 1:18-32, Gala 6:7; Jhn 1:5
    .

    PRAY: Pray for truth to prevail in Britain’s institutions
    Pray for courage among Christians in education and public life
    Pray for the protection of children and the restoration of moral boundaries.

    Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

     

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span

    Nurses Expose Britain’s Transgender Moral Confusion

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0
    A group of nurses from County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust (CDDFT) have lodged an employment tribunal case for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment.
    A group of nurses from County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust (CDDFT) have lodged an employment tribunal case for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment.

    Rose (Tyler) Henderson - just a large woman?
    Rose (Tyler) Henderson – just a large woman?

    At Darlington Memorial Hospital, eight nurses have been hauled before an employment tribunal. This follows raising concerns about being forced to undress in front of a biological male colleague.

    The nurses, including Bethany Hutchison, Lisa Lockey, and Karen Danson, complained that “Rose Henderson”, a man ‘identifying’ as a woman, was permitted to use the female changing rooms.

    Instead of safeguarding the women’s privacy, NHS managers ordered “kindness training” for the complainants and warned them to “broaden their mindset” and “be more inclusive.”

    Ludicrously, the NHS trust are claiming in court that ‘Rose’, whose real name is Tyler and who is built like a brick outhouse, is just like a ‘large woman’.

    Nurse Bethany Hutchison told a tribunal how she and colleagues were forced to undergo the training after complaining about a colleague Credit: Iain Masterton

    One nurse, a survivor of child sexual abuse, told the tribunal that seeing the male colleague half-dressed triggered flashbacks to her trauma. Others described distress, intimidation, and fear of disciplinary action merely for voicing concern.

    To compound the outrage, the same man was reportedly chosen by NHS bosses to lead diversity and inclusion sessions for those who objected to sharing intimate spaces with him.

    These nurses, now supported by the Christian Legal Centre, face not only an employment battle but possible misconduct probes by the Nursing and Midwifery Council after ideologically driven public complaints.

    When “kindness” is used to enforce falsehood, and women are punished for defending truth and modesty, we see what the Apostle Paul called “the mystery of iniquity”.

    2 Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

    1 Corinthians 13:6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth.

    Sign our petition against woke laws →

    Trans Lavatory Ban ‘Risks Breaking ECHR Rules’

    The clash between Westminster and Strasbourg has emerged over proposed UK guidance that would prevent men claiming to be women from using female lavatories and changing rooms.

    Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner Michael O’Flaherty has written to MPs warning that such a move could breach the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). He claims that restricting access by “gender identity” rather than biological sex would infringe the right to privacy under Article 8, forcing trans-identified people to “out” themselves when accessing single-sex spaces.

    In his letter, O’Flaherty—an Irish Catholic and long-time LGBT advocate—positioned himself as a moral authority over British law, implying that the UK must comply with Strasbourg’s interpretation of human rights.

    His intervention follows the UK Supreme Court’s ruling earlier this year that “sex” in law means biological sex, not self-declared gender.

    That landmark judgment paved the way for clearer guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) affirming that single-sex services and spaces may be reserved for women only.

    O’Flaherty’s letter is another example of unelected European officials meddling in domestic affairs and promoting the ideology of gender self-identification under the guise of “human rights.” The move highlights just how deeply transgender ideology has penetrated European institutions, where “inclusion” often takes precedence over truth, privacy and safety.

    It also raises serious questions about the democratic legitimacy of outside bodies attempting to override decisions made by Britain’s highest court.

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    The BBC has become the latest battleground in the growing cultural war over gender ideology.

    The corporation now allows staff to work from home if they are “uncomfortable with its trans-toilet policy”, which permits biological men to use women’s lavatories and changing areas.

    Instead of protecting the privacy and safety of women, the media house is enabling a confused system where “feelings” trump biological fact.

    The Supreme Court has already ruled that “sex” in the Equality Act refers to biological reality, yet the BBC refuses to act until the Government issues further guidance.

    Genesis 1:27 God made man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    The Cost of Compromise

    By allowing staff to work from home rather than fixing the root problem, the BBC sends a clear message: gender ideology outweighs common sense. Female employees, instead of being protected, are pushed out of the workplace to avoid discomfort and potential risk.

    Taxpayers fund this publicly owned organisation, yet it now fosters division and alienation within its ranks. Britain once led the world in fairness and order; now even lavatories have become ideological battlegrounds.

    Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.

    Join or Support Christian Voice →

    Workplaces Under Siege

    The gender-neutral toilet agenda is creeping through offices, schools, hospitals, and corporations. Women who object risk accusations of “transphobia,” while managers hide behind “inclusion policies.”

    Instead of uniting people, this ideology fractures trust and erodes respect. Workplaces once guided by professionalism now operate under fear of ideological reprimand.

    The line between privacy and politics has been erased by policy-makers who value social experiments over employee welfare.

    1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace..

    Men’s Prisons told to Offer Trans Inmates Make-up

    The exercise yard at the fictional 'Slade Prison'.
    The exercise yard at the fictional ‘Slade Prison’.

    As Britain celebrates its supposed progressiveness, the nation slides further into confusion. The latest absurdity? Men’s prisons have been told to provide make-up and beauty products for inmates who identify as women. Convicted criminals are now indulged with cosmetics in the name of “gender affirmation.” It would be comical if it were not tragic.

    When the justice system panders to delusion, punishment loses its moral force. The same political class that ignores victims’ cries now caters to the vanity of offenders. Across the public sector, truth is treated as hate, and biological reality is treated as bigotry.

    This is moral collapse on a continental scale. European bureaucrats, puffed up with self-importance, believe they have the authority to rewrite creation itself. And sadly, many churchmen echo them rather than oppose them.

    The proud letters from one Irish Church of England bureaucrat lecturing MPs on “trans inclusion” only show how deep the rot has spread into the institutions once meant to uphold God’s Word.

    Today, vileness is not only exalted, it is enshrined in policy.

    Psalm 12:8 The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.

    Genesis 1:27: Male and female created He them.

    Only One Side of the Trans “Debate” Silences Free Speech

    There are rare glimmers of courage amid the fog of fear. Actress Keira Knightley recently stood her ground against online “trans activists” after questioning the extremes of gender ideology in the entertainment world. Her defiance provoked fury from those who demand absolute conformity, yet she did not yield. In doing so, she proved that integrity still has a place in public life — even if it comes at personal cost.

    Contrast that courage with the silence of so many in power. Politicians, broadcasters, and bishops alike have chosen the path of least resistance. They bow to activists, ignore women’s safety, and call cowardice “compassion.”

    The cultural elite, once devoted to reason, now genuflect before feelings. The result is a society at war with itself, unable to define a woman, unwilling to defend a child, and unashamed of moral confusion.

    Christians must not follow suit. We are not called to appease error but to proclaim truth.

    John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free

    Love or Deception?

    A “transgender” woman (a man) who tricked another man into believing he was a woman has been found guilty of sexual assault.

    The biological XY bloke, who now goes by the name Ciara Watkin, from Thornaby, met his victim on Snapchat and pretended to be female, even claiming to be “on her period” to hide his true identity.

    His victim later discovered the truth and told police he would never have consented if he had known. The jury found Watkin guilty after a short trial at Teesside Crown Court, and he must now sign the sex offenders register.

    This case shows how easily people can hide behind the LGBTQ slogan of “inclusion” to deceive others. Society has been taught to “believe everyone’s truth”, even when that truth is built on lies. In this case, “gender identity” became a tool of manipulation. The same culture that demands silence in the name of love and kindness allowed a man to commit a grave offence without question.

    When truth is replaced by feelings, sin finds a hiding place. What was once shameful is now celebrated as “brave”. Watkin’s deceit is not a mistake; it is a warning. If society refuses to recognise God’s created order of male and female, confusion and exploitation will follow.

    A Nation in Moral Confusion

    Rebekah Chapman: Credit: https://x.com/sewingwithsteel
    Rebekah Chapman: Credit: https://x.com/sewingwithsteel

    From hospitals to prisons, from the arts to European bureaucracy, Britain is being forced to celebrate delusion and condemn truth. What began as “inclusion” has become coercion; what was once compassion has turned into tyranny of conscience.

    Up in Scotland, a designer says she was ordered to leave a shop after complaining about a staff member’s “no terfs, no Tories” badge.

    Rebekah Chapman, 33, said she was subjected to “intolerance and nasty slogans” after challenging the employee at Dundee’s Hobbycraft branch. She claimed the store’s manager sided with the staff member and told her to “read a biology textbook”. Hobbycraft have since apologised, but why did this happen in the first place?

    We are in cultural darkness, yet the call remains:

    Jeremiah 6:16 Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein

    Truth on Trial

    In modern Britain, stating that men and women are different can cost you your job or reputation. The ideology of gender fluidity demands silence or surrender.

    Public bodies like the BBC and NHS risk replacing biological fact with political fiction. Yet truth is not hateful. It is liberating.

    The Christian call is not to mock, but to stand firm and speak truth in love — even when powerful institutions oppose it.

    Proverbs 23:23 Buy the truth, and sell it not.

    A Call to Courage

    Christians must pray, speak, and act while there is still time. Every concession to gender ideology undermines creation order and endangers the most vulnerable.

    Protecting women’s spaces and affirming biological reality is not discrimination; it is obedience to God’s design.

    The Church must be a light in this darkness, showing compassion for those confused by gender ideology while refusing to bow before it. Britain’s future depends on rediscovering the courage to say what is true.

    Related stories

    Who is defying the Supreme Court’s biological realities ? →

    The promiscuous, predatory world of male homosexuality →

    “Police should not march with pride” →

    ‘Homosexuality genetic’? Not again! →

    Pussy Riot jailed & Moscow bans gay parades →

    Ofcom: “Broadcasters must call men women” →

    “Police should not march with pride” →

    Read and pray

    READ: Gen 1:27; Deut 30:19; Josh 7:10-11; 1Sam 2:30; Eccl 11:5; Prov 14:12;Matt 9:12; Mark 12:30-31; Ephesians 6:4; 1 Corinth 1:28-29

    PRAY: Thank God for these Nurses who have spoken up courageously.
    Pray that God should raise leaders who are not afraid to stand for the truth.
    Pray for the NHS and other government institutions.

    Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    How bad was the Eighteenth Century?

    By
    Stephen
    -
    1
    William Hogarth: Gin Lane (1751)
    William Hogarth: Gin Lane (1751)

    We’ve come across two hymns written at least two hundred and fifty years ago. Both call us to look at ourselves in the light of history and both speak to our day in calling for national repentance.

    Sign our petition while you are here:

    Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

    When Abram full of sacred awe

    Elizabeth Scott (1708-1776) penned ‘When Abram Full of Sacred Awe’ in the middle of the Eighteenth Century. It was published in 1769.

    Actually, the Lord had already changed his name to Abraham by the time he was pleading for Sodom (in Gen 18:19-33), but Miss Scott thought it best to fit her thoughts in to Common Metre, or four lines with syllables thus: 8.6.8.6. (We sing this to the tune ‘Cheshire’.) So she begins:

    1. When Abra’m full of sacred awe, before Jehovah stood,
    and with a humble, fervent prayer, for guilty Sodom sued;

    Her second verse describes the wonderful result of his prayer:

    2. With what success, what wondrous grace, was his petition crowned!
    The Lord would spare, if in the place ten righteous men be found.

    Of what was Britain ‘guilty’?

    The man of God did not dare go below the Hebrew number for a congregation, but even then, he pitched his request too high. As Elizabeth Scott goes on:

    3. And could a single holy soul so rich a boon obtain?
    Great God, and shall thy remnant cry and plead with thee in vain?

    No-one could be found in Sodom except righteous Lot, his wife and his weird daughters. Not even their husbands believed Lot’s warning of impending destruction (Gen 19:1-19). But why did she move on immediately to citing God’s remnant in her own day? And what does Miss Scott mean in the next verse by this:

    4. Britain, all guilty as she is, her several saints confess,
    And now their fervent prayers ascend; and can those prayers be lost?

    See gracious God before thy throne

    Our other eighteenth-century hymn was published in 1760 and written by Miss Scott’s contemporary Anne Steele, (1717-1778). It is also in CM (we use the tune ‘Burford’) and begins with six verses making a case for repentance and reformation. Here are the first four:

    1. See gracious God, before Thy throne, Thy mourning people bend;
    ‘Tis on Thy grace in Christ alone, Our failing hopes depend.
    2. Tremendous judgments from Thy hand, Thy dreadful power display;
    Yet mercy spares this guilty land, And still we live to pray.
    3. Great God! and why is Britain spared? Ungrateful as we are;
    O make thy awful warnings heard, While mercy cries, Forbear!
    4. What numerous crimes increasing rise, Through this apostate isle!
    What land as favoured of the skies, And yet what land so vile!

    Seventeenth Century upheavals

    So what was going on in their day to inspire these two ladies to speak of Britain’s guilt? Was not the Eighteenth Century, Georgian Britain, prospering and growing with an expanding empire? Did not Britannia rule the waves?

    The previous century had seen great upheaval. The throne of England and Wales became united with that of Scotland in 1603 under James VI/I, him of King James Bible fame. He was Protestant and targeted by the conspirators of the Gunpowder Plot in 1605. King James died in 1625. His son, Charles I, became arrogant and thought he was above parliament. That led to a dreadful civil war and to the king’s execution in 1649.

    The Commonwealth lasted until 1660. Parliament restored the monarchy in the shape of Charles II. But his son James II was adjudged a Roman Catholic activist and was deposed in 1688.

    Support Christian Voice →

    The Glorious Revolution

    Parliament brought James’s Protestant daughter Mary and her husband, William of Orange, over from the Netherlands in 1689, and enthroned them as joint rulers. Christians, that is virtually everyone of the time, gave thanks to God for this bloodless ‘Glorious Revolution’.

    After that tumultuous Seventeenth Century, William and Mary’s daughter Queen Anne reigned from 1702 to 1714. Climate change had brought about the ‘Little Ice Age’ by now. The low point was the Great Frost of 1709, when the ground froze to a depth of three feet during a terrible period of starvation and death from January to April. The Great Frost was followed by a severe economic depression. The Guardian explains how the cold left the economy in ruins: ‘Per capita gross domestic product dropped by 23%, and did not fully recover for another 10 years, all from a single terrible winter.’

    Anne was succeeded by her son George I, the first of the Hanoverians, in 1714. Now hymn writer Isaac Watts would give thanks in his hymn ‘To thee most holy and most high’ for deliverance from popery and for the ‘happy accession’ of King George.

    William Hogarth: Gin Lane (1751)
    William Hogarth: Gin Lane (1751)

    Drunkenness and depravity

    The optimism was not to last. The economy recovered, but the people fell into sin. Thirty-seven years later, in 1751, now under George II, William Hogarth engraved the illustrations ‘Beer Street’ and ‘Gin Lane’, castigating the drunkenness and depravity of London.

    John Wesley was preaching on sin and redemption up and down the land from 1727 until weeks before his death in March 1791.

    Nine years after Hogarth’s satires, as Miss Steele was printing her hymn and George III was acceding to the throne, in 1760, ‘Harris’s List of Covent Garden Ladies’ was first published. It was a blatant directory of London prostitutes. The ‘List’ was in print, constantly updated, until 1794.

    It was estimated that 6,000 – 7,000 mainly working-class women were earning a living from prostitution at the time in London alone. Another estimate is 50,000, which seems improbable out of a population of just 650,000. 6-7,000 is surely bad enough. John Wesley preached at least one sermon against prostitution, in the Covent Garden area of Seven Dials, in January 1763.

    Elizabeth Scott and Anne Steele speak to our day

    John Wesley, by George Romney
    John Wesley preached from 1727 to his death in 1791. Picture by George Romney

    Crime and venereal disease were rampant in the time when Wesley preached. Elizabeth Scott’s lines lead us to conclude homosexuality was also part of the sorry picture:

    5. Are not thy righteous dear to thee
    Now, as in ancient times?
    Or does this guilty land
    exceed Gomorrah in its crimes?

    Anne Steele seems to have agreed, even if words change their meaning over time:

    5. How changed, alas, are truths divine,
    For error, guilt and shame!
    Impious numbers, bold in sin,
    Disgrace the Christian name!
    6. Regardless of thy smile or frown,
    Their pleasures they require;
    And sink with gay indifference down,
    To everlasting fire.

    There was indeed an effeminate homosexual sub-culture of ‘Molly Houses’ existing at the time. It is sobering, if the expression does not fall too awkwardly in a discussion of the eighteenth century, to recognise our own times in the world about which Miss Scott and Miss Steele wrote.

    Not only was theirs a prophetic voice in their own time, but they speak to ours today.

    Suppression of vice

    When Miss Scott and Miss Steele were writing their hymns, Messrs Hogarth and Wesley were just about the sum of the century’s reformers. It is true that William Wilberforce was born in 1759 but neither lady would live to see him elected to Parliament in 1780.

    Nevertheless, the MP, together with Bishop Beilby Porteus, successfully petitioned King George III for a Royal Proclamation in June 1787 to suppress vice and honour the Lord’s Day.

    John Wesley wrote to Wilberforce to encourage him in his fight to end slavery in the last letter he wrote, days before his death.

    A ‘new thing’ in our land, in our day

    As the writer of Ecclesiastes puts it:
    Eccl 1:9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.

    However, there is one ‘new thing’ in our day which our hymn writers would not recognise. It may well be that politicians of their time were involved in the sins of their day. But they were not advancing them as good things. Hogarth’s paintings shocked because the viewers, politicians among them, recognised he had a valid point.

    Today, the entire British establishment is promoting the sins of homosexuality, transgenderism and abortion both at home and abroad, even to young children in ‘relationships and sex education’. The State actively promoting evil, spitting in the face of God, has only ever been done once in history, in Sodom and Gomorrah, in the Days of Lot.

    And that did not end well:
    Gen 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;

    Ask us to come and speak at your church →

    The hymn writers’ prayers

    The hymns ‘When Abram full of sacred awe’ and ‘See gracious God’ both end with prayers. There are also today those in our land who bear the name of Jesus. God dwells within us. Our Constitution yet owns the name above every name. We have a great spiritual heritage in the Lord Jesus. This land was founded upon the word of God. We can follow the writer of the epistle:

    Heb 4:16 Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.

    Therefore we can in confidence pray Miss Scott’s concluding verse and prayer:

    6. Still there are those who bear thy name, here yet is thine abode;
    Long has thy presence blessed our land; forsake us not, O God!

    Anne Steele’s last two verses go further. They call for repentance and for our rulers to seek the face of the King of kings. Her words have additional force when she prophetically speaks of ‘insulting’ invaders. Even then, she writes that we can be fearless, but only if our elite have drawn the nation close to God:

    7. O turn us, turn us, mighty Lord, By thy resistless grace;
    Then shall our hearts obey thy word, And humbly seek thy face;
    8. Then, should insulting foes invade, We shall not sink in fear;
    Secure of never-failing aid, If God, our God, is near.

    Join your prayers with ours as we pray for national repentance:

    How to Join or Support Christian Voice →

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Why the elite hate ‘Unite the Kingdom’

    By
    Stephen
    -
    2
    The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally
    The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally

    The 'Unite the Kingdom' rally
    The ‘Unite the Kingdom’ rally

    There is now an undeniable disconnect between ordinary people and those in office. The ‘Unite the Kingdom’ rally on 13th September in London’s Parliament Square and across Westminster Bridge drew almost hysterical comments from the Prime Minister. In an interview with Channel 4 News reported in the Standard, Sir Keir Starmer described the demonstration as “plastic patriotism”, adding that it had been more than “just very bad behaviour”, as if it were ‘very bad behaviour’ to turn up to an anti-establishment rally.

    Prov 28:15 As a roaring lion, and a ranging bear; so is a wicked ruler over the poor people. 16a The prince that wanteth understanding is also a great oppressor…

    How to Join or Support Christian Voice→

    The arrogance of Rehoboam

    King Rehoboam surveys the wreckage of his kingdom. (We nearly captioned him 'Keir Starmer')
    King Rehoboam surveys the wreckage of his kingdom. (We nearly captioned him ‘Keir Starmer’) (Christian Publishing House)

    It reminds us of the arrogance, stupidity and contempt for those below him of the Bible’s King Rehoboam, when the people asked for a reduction in their taxes. That did not end well for him. He lost the majority of his kingdom and Judah was then invaded by Egypt. Find the story in 1Kings 12 and 2Chronicles 10-12. It is well worth a read. As it happens, at the end he repented and in Judah, finally, we read, ‘Things went well’. That is what we want for our United Kingdom, but it depends on the Lord raising up righteous, humble, God-fearing men to lead us:

    2Chron 12:12 And when he humbled himself, the wrath of the LORD turned from him, that he would not destroy him altogether: and also in Judah things went well. (KJV)

    Rehoboan’s stupidity may well have been from the Lord, but nevertheless, the point stands. Arrogant rulers who underestimate the strength of feeling against them will fall under judgement.

    It appears there were 24 arrests on the day in London with eight people charged, but how many of those were from the rival hard-left protest has not been disclosed. In comparison, there were over 500 arrests over the two days of Notting Hill Carnival last month, ‘50 of them for possession of an offensive weapon’, according to the Telegraph.

    Eyewitness account

    The mainstream media were careful to put numbers attending around 100,000. Commentator Philip Patrick attended the rally and had a different view: ‘Suffice to say the numbers who were there … far surpassed the expectations of the police or the mainstream media. … The authorities underestimated the breadth and depth of feeling of people in UK who oppose the direction the country seems to be taking. … The proliferation of Union Jacks, flags of St George, Saltires and Welsh Dragons evidenced the UK-wide appeal of this event – not just how frustrated people feel, but a renewed spirit of Unionism, too.

    ‘The number of crosses and placards proclaiming Jesus Christ our saviour was, to me at least, surprising. “Jesus is King” was chanted from the stage at one point. (It) reinforced the mood of a people striving for a higher, better, ancient authority to appeal to.’

    Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King of kings, and Lord of lords.

    Downing Street condemned as “dangerous and inflammatory” comments of Elon Musk, urging those at the rally in London to “fight back” or “die”. The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said Mr Musk’s words threatened “violence and intimidation on our streets”, adding, hopefully: “I don’t think the British public will have any truck with that kind of language.”

    But Reform’s Nigel Farage said: “If the fight that Musk was talking about was about standing up for our rights and free speech, if it was about fighting in elections to overcome the established parties, then that absolutely is the fight that we’re in,” he said.

    Ask us to come and speak at your church →

    ’Shiver’ through ‘our communities’

    Sir Keir went on:“It sent a shiver through so many of our communities who now feel more scared than they did before. I understand that.”

    But Mr Farage responded: “I’ll tell you what’s even worse, the fact that over 50% of women don’t feel safe walking the streets alone.”

    Judges 5:6 In the days of Shamgar the son of Anath, in the days of Jael, the highways were unoccupied, and the travellers walked through byways.

    For London Mayor Sadiq Khan, writing in the Guardian, Elon Musk ‘tried to rally protesters against our democracy’. That’s Mr Khan’s and Sir Keir’s ‘democracy’ of course, not ordinary people’s. He also blamed Donald Trump for ‘dark times, but those who seek to divide us will not win.’ Those at the rally were from ‘the far right’, said the uber-inclusive mayor, leading London Assembly Conservative Leader Susan Hall to reply, ‘your constantly referring to others as far-right is divisive in itself’.

    ‘Rising tide of hatred’

    Sir Sadiq claimed ‘many people, particularly from London’s diverse communities, are feeling extremely worried.’ It’s those plural ‘communities’ now with added ‘diversity’ wheeled out again.

    We should note that when today’s elite speak of ‘our communities’ they acknowledge that they have destroyed the unified British community which stood together in two world wars. The ‘communities’ of which they speak are the Muslims who refuse to assimilate.

    Numb 15:16 One law and one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you.

    Showing little self-awareness, Mr Khan went on to claim ‘our politicians and pundits have refused to condemn the rising tide of hatred in this country’. The man who has encouraged antisemitic Islamo-left parades through London since 7th October 2023 said this even as the tide of hatred of the godless left for the late Charlie Kirk was on open display.

    Mr Farage and rally organiser Tommy Robinson are known not to get on, but the former was generous enough to say he thought “the vast majority of people that turned up were good, ordinary decent people who are very, very concerned about what’s happening in this country”. Sign our Petition:

    Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →

    Why the disconnect?

    Courtney Walsh, 12, 'punished' for wearing Union flag dress to school culture day - LBC
    Courtney Walsh, 12, ‘punished’ for wearing Union flag dress to school culture day – LBC

    So why is there such a disconnect between the elite and the ‘ordinary decent people’ at the rally? Why was a gathering intended to ‘unite the kingdom’ accused instead of division, of being ‘far-right’ and and inciting violence?

    It is because the concept of uniting the kingdom around our Christian heritage, around flags with the cross of Jesus Christ on them (there is an alternative Welsh flag, that of St David, with the gold cross on a black ground) is anathema to the elite.

    Prov 15:33 The fear of the LORD is the instruction of wisdom; and before honour is humility.

    They want to unite around globalism, multiculturalism and secularism. They hate our Christian heritage and want to disparage it. Hence sending a young girl home from school on ‘culture day’ because she wore a dress depicting the union flag.

    In fact 13-year-old Courtney Wright spoke at the rally. She was one of ‘Saturday’s best speakers’ according to the Telegraph’s Alison Pearson, who was there. And no, says Alison, the crowd were not ‘racist’.

    Ask for a free copy of our latest newsletter →

    ‘Culture based on lying’

    Dr David Starkey
    Dr David Starkey

    Exodus 18:21 Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness;

    Historian Dr David Starkey takes the problem with the establishment further on Spiked Online. He says: ‘Unfortunately, the ways in which our elites behave today is much like the elites of the latter days of the Soviet Union. It is an entire culture based on lying. Lying about output, about finance, about freedom. … If you govern by shutting people up rather than debating problems openly, those problems eventually grow to become feverish.’

    He scorned ‘this idea that immigration is ‘good for the economy’, etc’ and traced the rot back to 2010. ‘The fact that David Cameron, a supposed conservative, professed his greatest achievement was gay marriage was absolute insanity. At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, Britons have effectively been living under a uniparty since John Major. It’s no wonder people are so furious.’

    Dr Starkey concluded with a plea ‘To roll back the power of those elites who have lied to us about transgenderism, about multiculturalism and globalism.’

    But he warned ‘these ideas .. are so deeply entrenched’ within the establishment. ‘We can change these things. But we can only change it if the right here is as well-prepared as Trump was for his second term – or, I would argue, better.’

    The spiritual dimension

    Although Dr Starkey does not really ‘Do God’, he is speaking, whether he knows it or not, of the involvement of the spiritual dimension. The godless left are powered by the realm of darkness. Nothing else can explain both the glee over the death of Charlie Kirk and the current language of the elite and their terror of ‘Unite the Kingdom’.

    Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

    What Dr Starkey hopes for cannot be done in the flesh. Anyone who tries that will fail. And who better to bring that dimension of a prophetic voice into an emerging political party than Christian Voice members and supporters? Leave your comments below.

    READ: 1Sam 30:6; 1Kings 12; 2Chronicles 10-12; Prov 28:15-17; Isa 50:2-4, 51:7; Luke 13:31-33.

    PRAY: Pray the ordinary decent people standing for a kingdom united around our Christian heritage are encouraged in the Lord. Pray for the Lord to raise up more prophetic voices in politics today. Thank God for Danny Kruger and pray the Lord will keep him safe and encourage him.

    Email your MP HERE →

    Previous articles

    Christian MP defects to Reform →

    Tommy Robinson: Far Right? Hate Chants? →

    Illegal Migrants: blessing, threat, or judgment? →

    Keir Starmer’s sinister deals →

    Why has Kemi Badenoch lost her faith? →

    City bans Muslim festivals →

    Support us!

    We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
    So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

    Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

    Click on the social media links below to share this post:

    Oxford Union: What Charlie Kirk’s death reveals about the godless left

    By
    Makeda
    -
    0

    The news of Charlie Kirk’s death has shaken many, not only in America but also here in Britain.

    Mr. Kirk had always spoken of the importance of creating spaces where people could have real conversations where faith, truth, and even criticism of Christianity could be discussed openly.

    His passing has now brought into sharper focus the rising hostility faced by Christians who dare to stand firm in public debate.

    Christians are commanded not to return hate for hate but to love even those who persecute us. Kirk’s example — engaging with those who disagreed with him was a reminder that the Gospel is never advanced by silence or retreat, but by faithful witness.

    Matthew 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.

    Ask us to come and speak at your church →

    The hatred of the left

    Mr Abaraonye had engaged in a debate with the American conservative activist at the Oxford Union in May | YOUTUBE
    Mr Abaraonye had engaged in a debate with the American conservative activist at the Oxford Union in May | YOUTUBE

    The events surrounding Oxford Union and the grotesque celebration of Charlie’s death by The president-elect of the Union reveal something deeper.

    George Abaraonye sent a celebratory message around a WhatsApp group chat after the news that Mr Kirk had been shot during an event at Utah Valley University. The leaked messages have been widely shared on social media.

    They show Mr Abaraonye writing: Charlie Kirk got shot, left f**** go”. A separate message, believed to be from his Instagram account, read:

    “Charlie Kirk got shot loool” – an elongated version of the “laugh out loud” acronym.

    The Oxford Union was, lest we forget, founded in 1823 as a civilised debating society. Even today, it boasts that it is at the most prestigious debating society in the world, whose roots lie in free speech.

    Just three months ago the Late Mr. Kirk was in that same Oxford Union, speaking with the students, sharing his views, even being interviewed by George Abaraonye.

    All the time George was debating with Charlie Kirk at the Oxford Union, acting quite reasonably, asking him civilised questions, he harboured this visceral hatred for Charlie Kirk in his heart.

    There is Charlie talking innocently to someone who will gleefully celebrate his death just weeks later. But the ghoulish delight of George Abaraonye is widespread among the godless left.

    Social media is seething like maggots on a carcase with expressions of hatred for Charlie Kirk and elation at his murder.

    There is footage online of pro-abortion students at the University of Montana laughing about Charlie Kirks death.

    The celebrations of the death of this young Christian father-of-two who believes the Bible and expounds its truth carefully and reasonably even reached into the United States Congress, where Democrats disrupted a minute silence.

    Why did they hate the Lord?

    Our Lord Jesus was hated because he exposed and opposed evil deeds.

    John 7:7 The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.

    Number two is when the Lord was sending his disciples out into the world, in chapter fifteen:

    John 15:18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.

    This week we saw the hatred of the world for the testimony of Jesus and for his followers played out firstly in an assassination bullet and then in the gleeful celebration among the wicked which followed the news that a man of God had been murdered.
    Uncomfortable parallels
    There are uncomfortable parallels with the joy expressed by Muslims and leftists after the massacre of Jews on 7th October 2023.

    There is a demonic spirit at loose here, taking pleasure in and deriving power from the shedding of innocent human blood.

    What draws the atheists and the Muslims together is this word from Proverbs, where the wisdom of God is speaking.

    Prov 8:36 But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.

    We have seen that in our day with our own eyes. We have seen Muslims loving the death of Jews and now Secularists loving the death of a Christian evangelist and prophet.

    We might want the world to engage in reasonable dialogue, just as Charlie Kirk advocated, and maybe that should be our prayer and it should certainly be how we go about things, but we must never think the world is actually like that.

    The Lord Jesus said:
    John 15:13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

    Standing firm in truth

    Charlie Kirk’s legacy must be more than headlines about his death. It must challenge us to speak boldly, to love truthfully, and to stand firmly for Christ in a world that despises Him.

    We cannot allow fear or hostility to silence us. The Gospel is still “the power of God unto salvation”, and Christians must be prepared to carry it into every arena, even where we are hated most.

    How to Join or Support Christian Voice →

    Related Story

    Christian MP suspended over ‘faith’ rebellion →

    Tory Leadership: Do any of the candidates do God? →

    The Church of England’s Foreign Secretary→

    Blasphemy: Bishop Says All Churches Must Get Involved→

    123...26Page 1 of 26
    Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube

    EVEN MORE NEWS

    POPULAR CATEGORY

    © Newsmag WordPress Theme by TagDiv