A Muslim pupil at a London school has lost a High Court challenge against its ban on prayer rituals. But in a nation slowly turning demographically Muslim, how long can that ruling endure?
The girl wanted permission for Muslim children to pray en masse in the school’s yard.
Last year, until the ban, the court heard up to 30 children were praying using blazers to kneel on. She argued the ban was discriminatory.
The Bible says: Prov 18:17 The first in his own cause seems just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him.
In its own evidence, Michaela Community School in Wembley told the High Court that ‘allowing prayer rituals risked ‘undermining inclusion’ among pupils.’
The school argued its prayer policy was justified after it faced death and bomb threats linked to religious observance on site. It told the court of concerns about a ‘culture shift’ towards ‘segregation between religious groups and intimidation within the group of Muslim pupils’.
There is no legal requirement for schools to allow pupils a time or a place to pray. Michaela is a non-faith state secondary free school, independent of the local authority, but around half the school’s roughly 700 pupils are Muslim. In Britain as a whole it’s 8% and rising. The 6.5% of Muslims in the UK population are having more children than the rest.
The judgment
Mr Justice Linden gave an 83-page written judgement dismissing the student’s case. In it, he said, ‘The claimant at the very least impliedly accepted, when she enrolled at the school, that she would be subject to restrictions on her ability to manifest her religion.’
Indeed, pupils at Michaela are not allowed to gather anywhere in groups of more than four.
They must focus on teachers during lessons, stay silent in corridors, and observe restrictions on uniforms.
The school is often referred to a Britain’s strictest school. It is rated as outstanding by Ofsted.
Dismissing the student’s case, His Honour said: ‘She knew that the school is secular and her own evidence is that her mother wished her to go there because it was known to be strict.
‘She herself says that, long before the prayer ritual policy was introduced, she and her friends believed that prayer was not permitted at school and she therefore made up for missed prayers when she got home.’
Islam requires prayers at specific times of the day, but also allows for ‘Qada’ or ‘make-up’ prayer for any that have been missed. The court heard Muslim pupils were already doing that.
Yet Sarah Hannett KC, representing the girl, argued that the school’s policy had the ‘practical effect of only preventing Muslims from praying, because their prayer by nature has a ritualised nature rather than being internal.’
Islam is indeed a religion of outward show, a religion of ‘works’, as we say.
Founder and head teacher of Michaela Community School.
The free school’s founder and head teacher Katharine Birbalsingh, said the ruling was a ‘victory for all schools’.
‘If parents do not like what Michaela is, they do not need to send their children to us,’ she said. We say if people do not like the UK’s Christian faith, they do not need to come here.
Meanwhile, the ruling pleased the National Secular Society (NSS) and Humanists UK. NSS said, ‘We are educators, politicians, religious leaders, academics and other individuals and representatives of organisations working across British society.
‘While our views on the merits or otherwise of faith schools are varied, where we do agree is that regardless of their religious character our state schools should be open, inclusive, and diverse.’
The Humanists UK, and the National Secular Society both say faith have no place in school. However, they mean apart from their own, secularist faith, of course.
We say schools in our constitutionally-Christian nation should celebrate and follow the Christian faith.
Education Secretary Gillian Keegan said, ‘I have always been clear that headteachers are best placed to make decisions in their school.
‘Michaela is an outstanding school, and I hope this judgment gives all school leaders the confidence to make the right decisions for their pupils.’
Ms Keegan recently issued guidance that schools should not allow pupils to change sex, or gender. However, she refuses to legislate to that effect, and appears powerless when head teachers ‘make a decision’ as she might say, to ignore it.
Which way forward?
The court judgment is a good outcome, but one which still raises questions about the direction our nation is moving in. Not least, we could wonder how long the establishment can maintain its current secular spiritual vacuum against the relentless rise of Islam if they refuse to return the United Kingdom to our Christian heritage and confess, as the Apostle puts it: Php 2:11b that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
READ: Gen 1:27-28; Ezekiel 16:49; Romans 1:25-27; 1 Cor 6:9; Gal 5:19; Col 3:5; Hebrews 13:4.
PRAY: for the repeal of woke laws.
Pray for the Church to wake up and stand up for King Jesus.
Pray for our leaders to repent and seek the Lord.
Pray for our children.
Pray for what is hidden to be revealed, and go in to your child’s school and demand to see their policies on sex education and transgenderism.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.
Support us!
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
To commemorate the 100th anniversary of the first eugenics conference, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation put on a family planning conference this summer.
The conference, which began on 11 July and was co-hosted by the UK Department for International Development, included among its coalition partners such organizations as Planned Parenthood, Marie Stopes International, and the United Nations Populations Fund (UNFPA).
From Hard Eugenics to Soft Eugenics
The original conference that Bill Gates wished to commemorate was titled The First International Eugenics Congress. It was convened in London from 24-29 July, 1912, and was presided over by Leonard Darwin, the son of Charles Darwin. The conference was dedicated to Charles Darwin’s half-cousin Francis Galton (1822–1911). Galton invented the term Eugenics to describe his theory that man could be perfected through strategic breeding. His ideas that certain races are genetically superior to other races had a profound impact on later Nazi theorists.
The 1912 conference included an exhibit by the American Breeders’ Association, whose former president, Harry Laughlin, proposed to eradicate the “inferior” members of society through compulsory sterilization. The conference featured a presentation from Bleeker van Wagenen, who gave a report on the progress of sterilization laws in the United States and advocated compulsory sterilization as a means for improving the human gene pool.
Early 20th century Eugenics theory was often accompanied by the notion that economics can be improved by decreasing the surplus population. Such ideas were based on the theories of Thomas Malthus (1766 –1834) who suggested that the poor were draining the world’s recourses. One of Malthus’s solutions for reducing the surplus population was to introduce policies specifically designed to bring death to large numbers of peasants. For example, he encouraged poor people to move near swamps, because he knew that they would catch diseases there and begin dying off.
The conference that the Gates Foundation put on to commemorate The First International Eugenics Congress included no calls for forced sterilization, but Bill and Malinda Gates did pledge hundreds of millions of dollars to improve access to contraception in the developing world. Following in the footsteps of early 20th century social engineering theory, they echoed Malthus by suggesting that we have an economic responsibility to ensure that there are fewer people. Wendy Wright has rightly called this the “latest effort to blame children for poverty and women’s troubles.”
Bill Gates is quick to repudiate his dependence on Malthus. Inan interview with PBS, he told Moyers that “The one issue that really grabbed me as urgent were issues related to population” and he shared how originally he “thought that the Malthusian principles applied at least in the developing countries.” Gates went on to say how he came to understand that “essentially Malthus was wrong” and that alternatives to Malthus’s doomsday scenarios included raising wealth, improving health and educating women.
But we should not be too quick to assume that Bill and Melinda Gates have completely abandoned their earlier Malthusian framework. On the contrary, Mr and Mrs Gates have both frequently drawn attention to the economic ramifications of there being too many people. This was made explicit by Melinda Gates in 2011 when she commented that “Government leaders…are now beginning to understand that providing access to contraceptives is a cost-effective way to foster economic growth…”
So what exactly is the relation between contraception and economic growth? The connection is simple: fewer people = more resources. This may not be the hard eugenics of Malthus, but it certainly involves what Andressen Blom and James Bell have appropriately termed “soft negative eugenics.” In an article for The American Thinker last June, Blom and Bell define soft eugenics as follows:
“for economic reasons governments should use taxpayer dollars to underwrite the decisions of citizens to pursue recreational sexual activity. The underlying economic assumption is that the prospective children of the poor citizens likely to utilize such government-funded programs would be likely to hamper economic growth if they are born.”
Decreasing the Surplus Population
This is not the first time that Bill and Malinda Gates have ventured into population control. At the Technology, Entertainment and Design 2010 Conference, Bill Gates gave a talk in which he suggested that the solution to global warming is to have fewer people.
This is part of a new groundswell of interest in population control which posits a direct relationship between global warming and the amount of people on the earth. The Microsoft founder reduced our planet’s problem to a simple equation: CO2=P x S x E x C CO2(total population-emitted CO2 per year) = P (people) x S (services per person) x E (average energy per service) x C (average CO2 emitted per unit of energy).
The goal, Gates said, was to “get this down to zero.” Referring to P(eople) specifically, he said, “Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
That’s right. Rather than leading to more life, which was the original purpose of vaccines and healthcare, their great advantage in Gates’ mind is that they can lead to fewer people. While this is obviously true when it comes to contraception, it is hard to understand how vaccination is specifically related to a decrease in the population. (But hold onto that thought.)
The Gates Foundation are certainly doing all they can to decrease what it sees as surplus population. In May of this year, they gave a grant of $100,000 to researchers at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill to develop a new type of ultrasound which has been described as a “non-invasive, reversible form of birth control for men.” Already tested on animals, it would make a man infertile for up to six months. Nine other grants were given to other scientists attempting to create new forms of contraception.
Forced Sterilization
One of the coalition partners in last month’s conference was Planned Parenthood, whose founder Margaret Sanger hoped to “assist the race towards the elimination of the unfit.” Similarly, Marie Stopes International, who also had a prominent presence at the conference, was started by a woman who advocated for “the sterilization of those totally unfit for parenthood [to be] made an immediate possibility, indeed made compulsory.” (To read more about forced sterilization in the 20th century, see my article ‘Social Engineering and the Dark Side of American Liberalism.’)
But while these organizations previously supported forced sterilization, surely no one in the West still thinks that the poor and ‘feeble minded’ ought to be subjected to compulsory sterilization, right? Well, not so fast. Consider the following facts:
The Gates Foundation has partnered with the United Nations Populations Fund (UNFPA) which also supports China’s one-child-only policy and frequently appeals to global warming as a reason to curb the human population.
The London conference that the Gates Foundation put on last month was co-hosted by the UK’s Department for International Development, which has given aid money to India despite warnings that it would be used to forcibly sterilize poor women. (See ‘UK aid helps to fund forced sterilisation of India’s poor.)
In its autumn 2009 edition (Issue 10), Salvo magazine reported that the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has come up with a new way to reduce poverty: reduce poor people. The campaign, which has been supported by Bill Gates, does so by supporting and funding coercive sterilization, contraception and abortion campaigns.
The Hidden Truth About Vaccines and Forced Sterilization
Rather than leading to more life, which was the original purpose of vaccines and healthcare, their great advantage in Gates’ mind (at least according to his remarks at the Technology, Entertainment and Design 2010 Conference) is that they can lead to fewer people. While this is obviously true when it comes to contraception, it is hard to understand how vaccines are specifically related to a decrease in the population.
The connection between vaccines and population control becomes clearer if we consider an event that occurred in the early 1990’s. The World Health Organization, working under the control of the UN, launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of people in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines against tetanus. The project was supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, the UN Development Programme, and the US’s National Institutes of Health.
Tetanus is a potentially lethal infection caused by external wounds or cuts from things like rusty nails. There is nothing unusual in tetanus inoculations, which are routine in the Western World. But there was something that didn’t quite add up about these particular vaccinations.
For one thing, the WHO was choosing to only vaccinate females. For another thing, the girls they chose to vaccinate are primarily those between the ages of 15 and 45 (in Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.)
It wasn’t just disease experts who noticed that something was amiss. After all, it doesn’t take a great deal of intelligence to know that men and boys are more prone to wounds from cuts and rusty nails than ladies. So why was the WHO only choosing to vaccinate girls of child-bearing age?
To make matters more suspicious, the vaccination protocols were calling for multiple injections — three within three months and a total of five altogether. However, tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, so why this call for multiple inoculations?
These were the questions that Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, began asking and why they decided to have some vaccine samples tested.
The tests revealed that the tetanus vaccine contained human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). hCG is a natural hormone that is secreted during the initial stages of pregnancy. When this hormone is combined with the tetanus toxoid carrier, it tricks the body into thinking that hCG is an invading enemy, with the result that a woman’s body begins producing anti-hCG antibodies, making it impossible for her to ever maintain a pregnancy.
After a number of labs exposed that the vaccine was really a life-time birth control shot, WHO officials tried to keep things quiet and continued administering the anti-fertility injections. It was only after the courts intervened that the WHO was forced to stop administering the vaccine. Unfortunately, by then the damage had already been done and thousands of girls in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines had been rendered permanently infertile. The scandal made it all the way up to the Philippines Supreme Court. To quote from an article on Lifesite news,
LifeSiteNews.com reported that in 1995, the Catholic Women’s League of the Philippines won a court order halting a UNICEF anti-tetanus program because the vaccine had been laced with B-hCG, which when given in a vaccine permanently causes women to be unable to sustain a pregnancy. The Supreme Court of the Philippines found the surreptitious sterilization program had already vaccinated three million women, aged 12 to 45. B-hCG-laced vaccine was also found in at least four other developing countries.
Was the 1990s tetanus scandal simply a medical blunder? Hardly! For 20 years prior to the incident, WHO researchers had been actively involved in creating anti-fertility vaccines utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier. This was publically documented in medical journals from the 70s through to the 90s.
What could possibly have motivated the World Health Organization to knowingly, but covertly, sterilize thousands of women in third world countries? While we do not have sufficient information to answer this question for definite, the answer could have something to do with the fact that population control is once again a growing public concern among the world’s elite. Consider that
Population control seems to be the pet topic among those men who control much of the world’s wealth. Not only Bill Gates but also Warren Buffett and Ted Turner have all spoken publically in favour of drastically reducing the human species, and supported programs designed to eliminate the excess in babies. For example, in 1996, Ted Turner stated that, “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
In an interview with the New York Times in 2009, Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg alluded to the fact that abortion is all about getting rid of certain types of people that we do not want around: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
Echoing comments made by the Optimum Population Trust in 2007, The London School of Economics suggested in 2009 that the best way to combat global warming is to reduce the surplus population through contraception and abortion. Their logic is simple: more people = more polluters.
A 2007 report, written by specialist Professor Barry Walters for the Australian medical journal, called for couples with more than two children to be charged a lifelong tax to offset their extra offspring’s carbon dioxide emissions. Parents would be charged $5,000 a head for every child after their second, and an annual tax of up to $800.
In a 1981 interview, Thomas Ferguson of the United States Department Office of Population Affairs, commented that “we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”
College professors and leaders frequently cite the Georgia Guidestones to in arguing that that we should “maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” To achieve that, the human population would have to be thinned by 90%.
The Anglo-Dutch financial empire has been and still is committed to reducing the world’s population from the present 6.7 billion, to under 2 billion persons. This has been stated repeatedly in the post-war period by such leading spokesmen as Lord Bertrand Russell, Julian Huxley, and World Wildlife Fund founders Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and the still-living Prince Philip, who has reiterated many times his desire to see the human population thinned.
Robert McNamara of the World Bank has said, “Excessive population growth is the greatest single obstacle to the economic and social advancement of most of the societies in the developing world.”
An initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 Earth Charter reads, “The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger has said “World population needs to be decreased by 50%.”
Friends of the Earth founder, David Brower, has stated, “That’s the first thing to do, start controlling the population in affluent white America, where a child born to a white American will use about fifty times the resources of a child born in the black ghetto.” “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license…. All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
President Obama’s top science and technology advisor, John P. Holdren, has advocated the possibility of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children.
WRITE: To your MP and ask your MP to protest to the Secretary of State for International Development about the way that Government money was used last month to commemorate the legacy of 20th century Eugenics. Your MP’s address is House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA. If you do not know who your MP is or wish to email your MP instead, click here to go direct to the UK Parliament’s list of MPs.
PRAY: That the Lord will continue to expose the evil being promoted by family planners and population control advocates. Pray that the plans of Bill and Melinda Gates will be channelled towards life rather than death. Pray that legislators overseas will become alert to the evil enclosed in the Trojan Horses of aid from the Gates Foundation and the UK Government. Pray that God will grant Andrew Mitchell a spirit of repentance or remove him and that the UK’s pro-abortion policy will not stand.
Forced adoption: Birth parents urged to give evidence to inquiry - BBC News
Forced adoption: Birth parents urged to give evidence to inquiry – BBC News
The BBC’s recent exposé on the UK’s forced adoption scandal has brought into the light one of the darkest and most disgraceful chapters in Britain’s post-war social history.
Between the 1940s and the 1970s, thousands of unmarried mothers – many of them young, vulnerable, and without support – were coerced into giving up their babies for adoption.
What should have been a time of love and protection became, for countless women, an experience marked by shame, abandonment, and state-sanctioned cruelty.
What has been uncovered is not simply administrative mishandling, but a cold and calculated campaign to sever the God-given bond between mother and child. Many of these women were held in so-called “mother and baby homes,” often run by religious institutions that, rather than offering refuge and compassion, enforced a harsh moral code that shamed young women into silence.
The accounts are heart-breaking: mothers denied even the chance to hold their newborns, or pressured to sign adoption papers while still in labour or heavily sedated. Families were told their children would be better off elsewhere – often with little regard for their welfare or identity. The emotional and psychological toll has been immense, lasting a lifetime for both mothers and the children taken from them. Ask us to come and speak at your church →
State complicity, Church compromise
This scandal was not the doing of a few rogue institutions, but a nationwide system of collusion between the state and the Church. Government policies, local authorities, and religious agencies worked hand-in-glove to facilitate forced adoptions, often sealing birth records and severing all links between mother and child. It is now clear that public funds supported a framework that operated more like an ideological machine than a welfare service.
Christian Voice UK has always stood firm that the family – as ordained by God – is sacred and must never be overridden by the state or diluted by social trends. Tragically, this was a time when institutions bearing Christ’s name participated in unholy deeds.
It is not enough to say “we didn’t know.” Those who claimed to serve the vulnerable must answer for how so many were ignored, silenced, and destroyed under their watch.
Denial, delay and global contrast
Britain stands increasingly alone in its failure to acknowledge the truth. Countries such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, Scotland and Wales have all issued formal apologies to the victims of forced adoption. Meanwhile, Westminster remains obstinately silent.
Despite a 2021 Joint Committee on Human Rights report that concluded the state bore clear responsibility, there has been no official apology from the UK government.
The example of Ireland’s Magdalene Laundries or the story of Philomena Lee – whose child was taken and sold abroad – highlight that this is not merely a domestic issue, but a global wound shared by many Western nations. Yet the UK government’s continued refusal to speak the truth or offer repentance sets it apart for all the wrong reasons.
What message does it send to the women still living with these wounds? That their suffering is too inconvenient to address? That bureaucratic inertia is more important than moral restitution?
A hidden medical scandal
To compound this injustice, the BBC has revealed disturbing evidence that women in these homes were often administered drugs such as Diethylstilbestrol (DES) to suppress lactation. These synthetic hormones have since been linked to cancer, reproductive issues, and generational harm. Worse still, many women were not even informed of what they were being given.
The notion that women’s bodies were so casually and callously treated – medicated, silenced, and sidelined – echoes the darkest practices of twentieth-century institutional abuse. The absence of adequate medical records only deepens the injustice, leaving many still unsure of the long-term health consequences they may yet face.
A growing movement for justice
Despite the state’s foot-dragging, courageous campaigners have continued to speak up. Groups like Mothers for Justice and the Movement for an Adoption Apology (MAA) have worked tirelessly to demand recognition, redress, and reform. Their stories – of stolen children, broken silence, and unhealed grief – are slowly but surely changing the narrative.
In 2024, the unveiling of the UK’s first public monument to victims of forced adoption in Cornwall was a historic moment. But this grassroots effort only underscores the silence at the national level. Why must grieving mothers erect their own memorials while the government offers none?
These campaigners are not asking for riches – they are asking for truth, healing, and dignity. Their cause is righteous, and the government’s delay is disgraceful.
Repentance is not optional
Scripture tells us that “ (). The time for bureaucratic hesitation is over. Britain must repent — not with vague regrets or muted reviews — but with a clear, public, and heartfelt apology.
The Bible says,
Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.
Anything less is not injustice — it is rebellion against the truth of God’s design for the family. Forgiveness, healing, and restoration are only possible through repentance. That repentance must begin in Parliament, in the Church, and in the hearts of those who enabled this cruelty.
Let it not be said that our nation chose silence over sorrow, delay over dignity, or pride over repentance.
PRAY: For families related to who are currently homeschooling their children. Pray for the minds of our children and young people.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.
Support us!
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
The World Health Organisation (WHO) is under pressure to withdraw guidance for schools, recommending that children aged four and under be taught about “enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body, early childhood masturbation”.
The organisation recommends that toddlers have “the right to ask questions about sexuality” and “the right to explore gender identities”. (Pictured right)
These topics are described by WHO as the “minimal standards that need to be covered by sexuality education”.
The World Health Assembly, with three delegates from each of the WHO’s 194 member states, is meeting in Geneva as we write. The delegates typically include a health minister, a health official, and your nation’s UN ambassador:
A Government spokesperson for the Department of Education told Christian Voice: “The UK Government does not recognise this WHO guidance and we don’t agree with its recommendations. We have not distributed or promoted it to schools.
“We offer our own guidance to help schools to teach children and young people about relationships and health. This is for primary school aged children and above.”
Christian Voice also contacted campaign groups who claim to represent children’s rights. Most declined to comment on this major issue involving the safety of children.
A spokesperson for Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) said: ‘The organisation is a very small team, and we haven’t looked at the WHO’s guidance on this. We also don’t do work surrounding this issue, so we are not able to comment on it’.
Barnados told us: ‘Unfortunately, we’re unable to help on this occasion’. Meanwhile, Save the Children Fund said: ‘We don’t have anything to add to this story, so we cannot help on this occasion’.
‘Children England’ are yet to get back to us. The Children’s Commissioner for England is yet to respond to our request for comment.
The UK Prime Minister reacts
The Telegraph reported that Mr Rishi Sunak is committed to bringing forward a review of statutory guidance on Relationships and Sex Education (RSE), in light of the “safeguarding scandal” of inappropriate materials being used in schools.
The Prime Minister made the pledge in the House of Commons in response to a question from Miriam Cates, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge. Ms Cates also organised a letter to Mr Sunak from fellow Tory MPs.
She told Mr Sunak that children are being “subjected to lessons that are age-inappropriate, extreme, sexualising and inaccurate, often using resources from unregulated organisations that are actively campaigning to undermine parents. This is not a victory for equality, it is a catastrophe for childhood.”
The Bible says, 1 CORINTHIANS 13:11 When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
MPs show concern
The Former Home Secretary Priti Patel MP, said: “It’s shocking to see what’s being taught to some children in our schools and concerning that parents are being ignored”.
Further, former Education Minister Brendan Clarke-Smith, who also signed the letter from Miriam Cates asking the Prime Minister to review sex education for children, warned: “To present contentious issues to young minds as facts is totally wrong”.
MP for Mansfield, Ben Bradley, stated, “I don’t think people have any real sense of what some children are being taught in their schools. I’ve spoken to many parents who have been horrified by some of the content”.
The Lord Jesus said in Matthew 18; 6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
No to sexualisation of children
Frank Furedi, executive director of the think-tank, Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC) said: “The exploitation of young people for political ends is already causing serious damage. The promoters of sexuality education are disorienting and disturbing kids.
“They are plunging them into a crisis of identity from their very earliest years onwards”.
On Spiked-online, Professor Furedi went further: ‘The purpose of the WHO guidance, which has been eagerly taken up by educational and health authorities over the past 10 or so years, is not education – it is indoctrination. This is clear from the WHO’s emphasis on ‘sexuality education’, rather than what used to be known as ‘sex education’. There is an important difference between these two terms. Whereas sex education involves teaching children about sex and human reproduction, ‘sexuality education’ focusses on gender and sexual identity. As part of ‘sexuality education’, children are not being taught the facts of life. They’re being taught a highly contested ideology.’
He added that adult society needs to fight back against this silent campaign of indoctrination.
Welsh Government followed WHO
Incredibly, the Welsh Government based its sex education policy on exactly the WHO terminology Prof Furedi condemned. Its draft Relationships and Sexuality Education Guidance published in 2019 said: ‘The change in name to Relationships and Sexuality Education reflects the internationally recognised World Health Organisation (WHO) standards for sexuality education.’
Mercifully, the Wales published guidance (2021) avoids the worst excesses of the WHO guidance. However, it still says: ‘Across the learning strands, curriculum content in RSE must be inclusive and reflect diversity. It must include learning that develops learners’ awareness and understanding of different identities, views and values and a diversity of relationships, gender and sexuality, including LGBTQ+ lives. ‘ It is, in other words, woke propaganda. And indeed, the word ‘sexuality’ occurs 16 tines, ‘gender’ 17. From age 11, children should have ‘An ability to advocate for and advance the rights of all and understand and respect all people in relation to sex, gender and sexuality.
Earlier this month, Laura Anne Jones, Conservative shadow minister for education in Wales’ regional government, challenged the WHO to take down its guidelines for sex education in Europe.
However, the problem is worldwide, with WHO advocating for Comprehensive Sexuality Education across the developing world. See this article from Kenya Christian Voice:
Currently, the Seventy-sixth World Health Assembly (WHA) is being held in Geneva, Switzerland, from 21 to 30 May 2023. The theme of this year’s Health Assembly is: WHO at 75: saving lives, driving health for all.
We call on world leaders to cease this opportunity to speak up about the aforementioned WHO sex guidance for toddlers that could destroy the minds and future of our children. The sessions can be watched live on the WHA site.
Deut 6: 7, 11:9; Psalm 34:11; Hosea 4:6; Matthew 18:1-5, 10; 1 John 3: 7; Ephesians 6:4. Pray for the minds of our children against evil vices and corrupt practices. Pray against plans to destroy the family unit ordained by God. Pray for the wisdom of God on our leaders.
We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to support or join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Members of Parliament (MPs) have debated petitions regarding “LGBT” content in relationships education.
MPs from all parties took part in the debate on 18th March.
The Government responded to the petition in January 2023, but it took over a year for MPS to debate it.
The petitions debated:
MPs debated two petitions—one calling for the removal of “LGBT” content from the Relationships Education curriculum (RE), and the other advocating to retain “LGBT” content in the education system.
This petition to remove “LGBT” content from the RE curriculum garnered more than 249,000 signatures, and states: ‘We believe kids shouldn’t learn about this at an early age. I am sure there are many parents who do not want their or other children taught about LGBT in primary school’.
Meanwhile, the opposing petition with more than 104,000 signatures, argues that children should learn about sodomy at an early age, concluding: ‘Kids should know … Despite what their parents might believe.’
Sign OUR petitions, which oppose RSE and the related issue of transgenderism:
During the debate, Elliot Colburn, the homosexual MP for Carshalton and Wallington, said; ‘The Government’s RSE guidance of 2019 advises schools to plan a developmental and age-appropriate curriculum. Relationships education is therefore approached in ways that are relevant to the age and maturity of the pupils. For example, teaching about “Families and people who care for me” in primary school can be an opportunity to talk about the fact that some people have “two dads and some have two mums.”
‘Key messages taught throughout relationships education include that people do not have to conform to narrow stereotypes and that discrimination, bullying and prejudice are harmful and wrong. Indeed, that principle is woven throughout the British values element of school teaching,
‘The aim of which is to encourage and foster respect, kindness, equality and inclusion. Those are British values: they are intrinsic to the ethos of most schools, and families are supportive of them.
‘Primary schools are not required to teach sex education or explicitly teach about “LGBT” issues; it is more about families and relationships. Parents also have the right to withdraw their child from the sex education part of RSE up to the age of 16.’
Please support our mission to bring you what the mainstream media won’t tell you, from a biblical perspective. Could you make a gift today of £30, £60, £100 or whatever you can afford?
Conservative MP for Morley and Outwood, Dame Andrea Jenkyns, said: ‘As the mother of a primary-age schoolchild, I do not want him or other children, straight or gay, to learn about sex full stop. I also do not want young children in primary school to be taught about changing gender.
‘I have no problem with whatever people want to do when they are older—life is short; be happy—but does my hon. Friend agree that we need to protect the innocence of children and their childhood, especially at primary school age?’
Meanwhile, Adam Holloway, Conservative MP for Gravesham, said: ‘Because the long-term emotional consequences of transition are not properly understood, we should be careful about teaching contested concepts to young, impressionable children.
We would not be doing right by the majority of parents if we failed to acknowledge that the idea that sex is ‘assigned at birth’ is not a universally held view, but the complexities of explaining that to children aged 11 or under are pretty obvious.
‘I also struggle to see how that issue could be taught honestly and objectively without explaining that there may be other reasons why a person feels uncomfortable about themselves or their body. Teaching that to primary-aged children is clearly hugely problematic.
‘Instinctively, for those reasons, I feel that the complex issue of transgender ideology has no real place on the primary school curriculum.’
MP for Don Valley, Nick Fletcher, said: ‘ Currently, up and down the country, we have schools teaching our children that girls can be boys and boys can be girls. It is hard to believe.
‘If we told our children that two plus two equals five enough times throughout their education, would we be surprised if some — not all but some — started to believe it?’
The Minister for Schools, Damian Hinds, said: ‘Guidance is clear that it is for schools to decide at what point in their pupils’ education it is appropriate to cover content related to “LGBT.”
‘That means that primary schools have discretion over whether to discuss sexual orientation or families that have same-sex parents.
‘The RHSE guidance does not provide a definition of what relationships and sex education should include, but it is clear that it should be “tailored to the age and the physical and emotional maturity of the pupils. It should ensure that both boys and girls are prepared for the changes that adolescence brings”.
‘Primary schools that do teach sex education must set out the details of what they will teach in their relationships and sex education policy, on which they must consult in advance with parents.’
‘Secondary schools should provide an equal opportunity to explore the features of stable and healthy same-sex relationships, and ensure the content is integrated throughout the relationships and sex education curriculum.’
Can we really ‘trust our teachers’?
Mr Hinds concluded: ‘We trust our teachers to deliver this content in a suitable and age-appropriate way, respecting the beliefs and values of all pupils in the school.’
There is a problem in ‘trusting our teachers’, which the government fails to see. If teachers are not themselves trans ideologues, they are working in an environment which is.
In the latest scandal, a teacher in Nottinghamshire was sacked for refusing to use an eight-year-old’s preferred pronouns and raising safeguarding issues over the child. The tribunal hearing the case has only just recused itself after one of its members was caught insulting Conservatives and saying only atheists should be in public office. Christian Concern are supporting the teacher, known only as ‘Hannah’.
If certain godless MPs and peers have their way, for a teacher, a parent or a church minister to raise such concerns would be against the law. That is why we invite you to sign our petition to protect freedom to speak to, advise and pray with people affected:
In October 2023, Secretary of State for Education, Gillian Keegan, wrote to parents regarding their rights to know what children are being taught in schools.
She wrote: ‘You may be aware of concerns about inappropriate materials being used in some cases to teach relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) in schools and parents who have had difficulty accessing these materials.
‘This Government is clear that this is not acceptable. You have a fundamental right to know what your children are being taught about healthy relationships, sex and development in school.
‘So, today I have acted by writing to schools, making it clear that as parents you should always be able to see the materials that are being used to teach your children. To place this right beyond any further doubt, my letter clarifies that copyright restrictions do not prevent you from seeing materials that are being used in the classroom.
‘I am clear that schools must share worksheets, presentations, or other content used in lessons with parents when asked to do so. This is regardless of what a school’s contract with the organisation that provided the materials might say.’
Nevertheless, schools can ignore the advice and once more, the Government seem not to be spurred to action to make their advice statutory.
Sodomy part of education?
In March 2023, head of the schools regulator, Ofsted, warned that some sex education lessons are not based on reputable scientific explanations.
Amanda Spielman, Ofsted’s boss, told the Telegraph that she had alerted the Government about the lack of limits in the current relationships and sex education (RSE) guidance.
She cautioned that Ofsted currently lacks the authority to penalise schools teaching inappropriate material.
Meanwhile, in some secondary schools, pupils were being taught that there are 100 genders, and ‘gender fluidity’ is presented as fact in some major academy trusts and independent schools.
A dossier of evidence gathered by Conservative MP Miriam Cates was presented to Rishi Sunak, which led to the Prime Minister ordering a review of the Department for Education’s (DfE) RSE guidance. The Bible says children should be taught according to the laws of God:
Deut 11:19 And ye shall teach them (the laws of God) to your children, speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
READ: Lev 20:13 Deut 6:6-7; 1 Kings 14:24 ; Isa 28:9b, Isa 28:17; Ezek 16:49; Matt 9:12b; Rom 1:25-27; Eph 5:9; 2 Peter 2:6-10; Jude 7:1; PRAY: for the repeal of woke laws.
Pray for the Church to wake up and stand up for King Jesus.
Pray for Britain’s education system.
Pray for our leaders to repent and seek the Lord.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.
Support us!
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Two decades after the explosion of free, on-demand pornography online, Britain is reaping the bitter harvest.
The first generation to grow up under its shadow is now entering adulthood, and the results are catastrophic. Far from simply sexualising children, pornography has reshaped how they think about love, relationships, and even human worth.
According to research from the Children’s Commissioner, almost half of young people now believe girls expect sex to involve physical aggression, and 42% think girls enjoy such violence. We are raising a generation whose ideas about intimacy come not from parents or Scripture, but from the gutter of the internet.
Yet, as spiked’s article, “How Porn Has Taken Over the Classroom” puts it, this crisis has not been caused by porn alone. Schools themselves, meant to protect and nurture the young, have become unwitting agents of the “pornocracy.”
Teachers, overworked and under-trained are increasingly relying on third-party “sex education” providers for lesson plans and classroom materials. These groups, operating with almost no oversight, are smuggling pro-porn messages into British classrooms.
In 2023, The Times exposed how the educational giant Tes was selling resources for children as young as eleven that discussed anal sex, pornography, and nude selfies. Far from warning children of porn’s dangers, these materials normalised it.
Even worse, resources like “Let’s Talk About Porn,” from South West Grid for Learning told pupils that we “don’t know” whether porn is bad for them — and encouraged them to see it as something that could be part of a “healthy relationship.”
One government-commissioned report, What is Being Taught in Relationships and Sex Education in Our Schools?, revealed that these groups openly promote the idea that “there is nothing inherently wrong with young people seeing pornography.”
Split Banana, one such provider, even encouraged teachers to discuss the merits of “feminist porn” and the importance of “paying for it.”
This is not education, it is indoctrination.
A Death-Wish Among the Elite
No parent demanded this. No manifesto promised it. The imposition of sex education in schools and the subversion of that education by porn-linked activists — was done without public consent. It reflects a deeper rot: a ruling elite that has lost its moral compass and, with it, its instinct for survival.
As Christians, we must call this what it is: rebellion against God’s created order. Scripture is clear that it is parents, not bureaucrats or lobbyists, who bear the duty to teach children right from wrong.
Deuteronomy 6:6–7 And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: and thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children.
Psalm 34:11 Come, ye children, hearken unto me: I will teach you the fear of the LORD.
From the beginning, God’s design for sexuality was holy and life-giving, the union of husband and wife. To tear it from the covenant of marriage, to expose children to its counterfeit forms, is to lead them into harm’s way. Christ Himself gave the most solemn warning.
Luke 17:2 It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.
When Child Protection Turns to Promotion
ChildLine, the advice service run by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), produced a an article telling children that “porn is fun to watch” and “sexy to enjoy.”
The content even directed its young readers to look up categories such as “BDSM and hardcore”.
Between April 2015 and April 2021, that video was viewed more than three million times, before being taken down following a campaign and petition by the SSA.
That such a video was ever produced by a children’s charity is a shocking sign of how far our culture has fallen. Those charged with guarding the young have instead led them into temptation. The watchmen have slept, and the wolves have entered the fold.
It is no wonder that Christ warned so solemnly:
Matthew 18:6 Whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
The Global Pornocracy
This is not just a British scandal. The same corrupt ideology infects “Comprehensive Sexuality Education” (CSE) programs worldwide, as Judy’s article on Plan International shows.
Under the banner of “empowerment” and “inclusion,” CSE promotes sexualisation from primary school onwards. It is a global campaign to normalise sin and desensitise the young.
Pornography’s infiltration of classrooms, from London to Lagos, from Birmingham to Bangkok, shows a coordinated worldview at work. It is not accidental. It is a movement that seeks to erase innocence, break down parental authority, and destroy the biblical view of man and woman.
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.
Christian Witness in a Dark Age
Christian Voice has twice recently witnessed outside major teachers’ conferences in Birmingham, calling for purity, truth, and parental rights. Those actions were not protests alone — they were acts of prophetic witness.
The Church must speak when the schools have lost their way. We are to be the light of the world, not silent observers while the next generation is defiled.
Ephesians 6:4 Fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.
The Failure of Parental Oversight
For too long, parents have been kept in the dark about what is being taught under the name of “sex education.” The RSHE curriculum is often delivered without transparent materials, without parental consent, and sometimes even in secret.
In many cases, when parents ask to see what their children are learning, they are told it is “confidential.” That is not education — it is deceit. Parents are God’s appointed guardians of their children’s hearts and minds.
Ephesians 6:1–2 Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother.
Titus 2:4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children.
Unless Christian parents take back this sacred responsibility, the pornified culture will do it for them — with disastrous consequences.
The Cost to the Soul of the Nation
This issue is not merely about morality, it is about national survival. When a nation abandons purity, it also abandons its future. A society that sexualises its young cannot sustain family life, nor produce stable men and women fit to lead or love.
Britain today is spiritually adrift, its leaders ashamed of the Gospel, its educators ashamed of innocence. That is why the elites’ obsession with “sex education” has become a form of cultural suicide — a death-wish dressed up as progress.
Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.
A Call to Repentance and Renewal
This moment calls not for despair, but for action rooted in prayer. We must return to the wisdom of God’s Word, to the holiness of marriage, the purity of childhood, and the sacred authority of parents.
Let the Church rise again as a moral conscience for the nation. Let believers refuse to be silent while children are handed over to the porn industry under the cover of “education.”
2 Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
PRAY: Pray that the Lord will protect our children, guide their teachers, and raise up righteous leaders to uphold justice and truth. Strengthen those who care for the young, expose corruption, and let Your will be done in education and governance. Guard innocence, punish the wicked, and help us all walk in Your ways. Amen.
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
A three-year-old child has been suspended from a nursery for alleged ‘transphobia’ or ‘homophobia.’ Let that sink in.
A toddler barely able to form full sentences,has been accused of discriminating against an ideology they cannot possibly comprehend. The absurdity of this cannot be overstated.
Department for Education (DfE) statistics reveal that 94 primary school pupils faced suspension or expulsion for similar allegations in the 2022-23 academic year, including ten Year One pupils and three in Year Two, the eldest of whom were merely seven. This isn’t just madness, it is an ideological crusade against innocence.
This is not an isolated case. We have seen the same zealotry in action before, a six-year-old in Scotland interrogated for refusing to use ‘preferred pronouns’ and a ten-year-old in England punished for writing that ‘boys are boys and girls are girls.’ Schools have ceased to be places of education; they are now re-education camps for radical ideology.
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Teachers and governors- have they lost their minds?
What on earth is happening to teachers and school governors? Have they completely lost touch with reality?
Is it the endless ‘inclusivity’ and ‘diversity’ courses they are forced to attend? Have they been so indoctrinated by radical activism that they now see children as ideological enemies?
We have seen teachers dismissing pupils for questioning transgender ideology, governors sacking staff for standing up for Christian beliefs, and entire schools collapsing under the weight of their own ideological contradictions.
Who benefits from this insanity? Certainly not the children, whose early education is being traumatically disrupted.
Helen Joyce of Sex Matters rightly condemned this disgrace, saying: “Teachers and school leaders involved in this insanity should be ashamed of themselves for projecting adult concepts onto young children.” Yet they are not ashamed. They are doubling down.
1 Corinthians 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
G.K. Chesterton famously said, “When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.” This is precisely what we are witnessing: adults who have abandoned biblical truth are now willing to believe and enforce the most ridiculous ideas, even to the detriment of children.
The legal requirement for a daily act of Christian worship in state schools is routinely ignored. Humanists have long campaigned against it, and we see the results: a godless system that teaches children not to believe in nothing, but to believe in everything except the truth.
Psalm 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
More and more parents are turning to home-schooling, and who can blame them? When schools suspend toddlers for ‘wrongthink,’ when teachers preach gender ideology instead of phonics, when children are punished for adhering to basic biology, parents have no choice but to take back control of their children’s education.
The government, of course, is panicking. It is considering the Children’s Well-being and Schools Bill,’ which aims to increase oversight of home education. The possibility of a ‘register’ of home-schooled children looms large, likely to be used as a tool for state interference.
Will backbenchers sneak in an amendment that further clamps down on parental freedom? That remains to be seen, but the trend is clear: the state is desperate to keep control over children’s minds.
Proverbs 22:6 Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it
Five-year-olds expelled for violence—a convenient excuse?
The same authorities suspending toddlers for ‘transphobia’ are also expelling five-year-olds for ‘violence’ against teachers. But what does ‘violence’ mean in this context? A tantrum? A thrown toy? A refusal to obey? This vague, overreaching definition serves a dual purpose: to justify removing ‘difficult’ children from the system and to fuel the narrative of ‘toxic masculinity’ even in infancy.
We saw similar absurdities in 2018 when a four-year-old boy was labelled a ‘sexual threat’ for hugging a teacher. In another case, a six-year-old was expelled for calling his classmate a ‘she’ instead of ‘they.’
It is clear that modern schools are no longer fit for purpose. They are not educating; they are indoctrinating.
Proverbs 13:24 He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.
A nation’s madness
Picture the scene: The Education Secretary, flanked by the Schools Minister and the soon-to-be Baroness former head of Ofsted, standing at a press conference, solemnly discussing the latest initiative to ensure “inclusive” education.
Meanwhile, in a brightly coloured nursery classroom, a bewildered three-year-old clutches their toy dinosaur, blissfully unaware that they are about to be exiled for supposed “transphobia.” The headteacher, holding an Equality and Diversity handbook, delivers the verdict: “We take discrimination seriously.” The child, whose crime may have been an innocent remark or a refusal to play make-believe under ideological demands is cast out, one of the youngest casualties of a system gone mad.
This, of course, took place just weeks after another February drenched in ideological fanaticism, as schools across Britain observed LGBT History Month with the usual fervour. Assemblies were held, lessons were rewritten, and small children were subjected to lectures on gender identity before they could even master their times tables. Parents who dared to question the content were dismissed as bigots, while teachers who expressed concern were silenced.
The battle for our children’s future
This is not just a battle for common sense. It is a battle for truth itself. If the state can dictate ideology to a three-year-old, then no one is safe. If teachers can expel children for questioning lies, then our society is on the brink of collapse.
It is time for parents to push back. To demand accountability. To insist that schools return to education rather than indoctrination. To resist attempts by government to register and regulate home-schooling into oblivion.
The enemy of truth has captured our institutions. If we do not reclaim them now, we may soon find that we have lost an entire generation.
John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
READ:Gen 1:27-28; Lev 19:03 ;1Sam 08:03; Psa 144:12 ; Prov 03:12; Isa 03:04-05; Matt 15:04a; Luke 02:51.
.
PRAY:Pray for the NHS. Pray for our God-fearing leaders.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.
Support us!
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers. So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Emma Hardy MP, sponsor of today's 'No Outsiders' meeting in the Palace of Westminster.
Emma Hardy MP, sponsor of today’s ‘No Outsiders’ meeting in the Palace of Westminster.
Head teachers are gathering in a meeting today in Westminster to defend gay lessons in the wake of parental protests around pro-gay propaganda being given to primary school children.
The meeting is organised by the National Association of Head Teachers and hosted by Emma Hardy (Labour) MP for Hull West and Hessle. Homosexual activist Andrew Moffat, creater of ‘No Outsiders’ will attend.
‘Opportunities’ from New Regulations
Under a heading ‘School leaders’ parliamentary briefing on Relationships Education and equality’, the NAHT web page says:
‘Primary school leaders in some areas of the country have been the targets of campaigning, protests and abuse relating to their commitment to equality and diversity. LGBT+ inclusion has been the focus of these protests. Protesters have argued that this learning should not happen in primary schools and parents should be able to withdraw their children from it.
‘On 11 June, school leaders on the front line will provide first-hand accounts of the challenges and opportunities that the announcement of the new regulations has meant for them, within our school communities.
‘This briefing will take place on Tuesday 11 June from 3pm to 4pm in Committee Room 9 in the main House of Commons building.’
‘No Outsiders’ activist attending
Andrew Moffat (holding the 6-colour ‘diversity’ rainbow umbrella) leading the Birmingham Gay Pride parade last month.
‘Speakers will include:
‘Paul Whiteman – NAHT general secretary
Emma Hardy – MP for Hull West and Hessle
Nazir Afzal – former Crown Chief Prosecutor for North West (video contribution. This is the guy who was supposed to be ‘mediating’ between Parkfield School and the parents.)
Sara Khan – lead commissioner, Commission for Countering Extremism. (So if you stand up for your child against LGBT propaganda you are now an ‘Extremist’)
David Isaac – chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission. (Gay activist and previous head of Stonewall. Here he is giving a lecture; look out for 13:50 and 1:06:10)
Jono Baggaley – CEO of the PSHE Association. (Only to be expected.)
Steve Edmonds – director of advice and guidance, National Governors Association. (What did he have to say?)
Sarah Hewitt-Clarkson – head teacher at Anderton Primary School, Birmingham. (Site of latest protests.)
Andrew Moffat – deputy head teacher, Parkfield Primary School, Birmingham. (Gay activist. Not a tecaher.)
Simon Kidwell – head teacher at Hartford Manor Primary School in Northwich, Cheshire. (What’s going on there in Northwich?)
Dean Taylor – president, NAHT Wales and head teacher in Newport.
Rob Partington – head teacher, New Moston Primary School in Manchester, and Stonewall training partner. (Parents in Manchester beware.)
‘If you would like to attend this critical briefing, please RSVP to organising@naht.org.uk.’
Prayer
Please pray for confusion in this meeting. May the Lord’s enemies be scattered!
Psalm 144:6 Cast forth lightning, and scatter them: shoot out thine arrows, and destroy them.
Isa 41:16 Thou shalt fan them, and the wind shall carry them away, and the whirlwind shall scatter them: and thou shalt rejoice in the LORD, and shalt glory in the Holy One of Israel.
We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Nursery worker who raped toddlers jailed for 24 years
A former paedophile nursery worker has been jailed for 24 years after raping and abusing toddlers in his care at a Bristol childcare facility.
The case raises the question of whether men should be allowed to work in childcare at all. For that matter, why are young women being employed as prison officers in men’s prisons? Is this the same unscriptural woke mindset that forces girls into science and engineering, ‘STEM’ subjects? Is fashionable ‘gender equality’ now putting children’s lives and public safety at risk?
Prov 14:12 (cf 16:25) There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. (KJV)
The offender, Nathan Bennett, 30, targeted children aged just two and three at the Partou King Street Nursery, and was found guilty of eight charges including rape, sexual assault, and assault by penetration relating to five victims.
He had previously admitted a further 13 offences, bringing the total scope of his crimes into stark relief, with the court imposing a 24-year sentence alongside an extended licence period of six years.
The offences were described in court as deeply depraved and calculated.
Sentencing at Bristol Crown Court, Judge William Hart delivered a stark moral assessment, describing Bennett as an “incorrigible and dangerous paedophile” with an “uncontrollable and ungovernable” sexual interest in young boys, concluding that his actions were driven by “grossly distorted thinking” and, in his words, “evil.”
Such language is notable in a judicial setting often characterised by restraint, and reflects both the severity of the offences and the deliberate prioritisation of personal gratification over the welfare of defenceless children entrusted to his care.
At the centre of this case lies a difficult reality: the care of very young children is now routinely transferred from the home to institutions.
In these settings, strangers are given prolonged and intimate responsibility over children during their most vulnerable years. For many parents, this is not a choice but a necessity, driven by economic pressure and the demands of modern working life. Yet the system that replaces parental oversight relies heavily on procedures and assumptions of professionalism. As this case shows, those safeguards can fail, and when they do, the consequences are severe.
Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
Meanwhile, evidence presented in court showed that concerns had been raised about the offender’s behaviour months before his arrest. Both staff and parents reportedly expressed unease. However, these warnings were not escalated or acted upon with sufficient urgency.
This points to a wider failure in safeguarding culture. Systems exist, but they depend on people acting decisively. When hesitation, complacency, or fear of getting it wrong takes hold, risk is allowed to grow.
Sentence Does Not Begin to Repair the Harm
Nursery worker who raped toddlers jailed for 24 years
In a statement issued by Leigh Day, the law firm representing several of the families involved, they said the sentence “does not begin to repair the harm caused to so many children”.
“We entrusted our children to Partou King Street nursery believing they would be safe, cared for and nurtured,” they said.
“Instead, that trust was catastrophically broken by someone who abused his position in the most unimaginable way.
“Over the months before Bennett’s arrest, a number of parents raised concerns about his behaviour.
“We know concerns were raised to members of staff, we believe those warnings and complaints were not properly followed up or escalated. Had appropriate action been taken sooner, we fear some of the abuse children suffered may have been prevented.”
Public Reaction and Reader Commentary
Reader responses to the case highlight both unease and frustration over how children’s safety is managed. Ryan Brighton wrote on the Telegraph’s comment session:
“In a way I find it sad that any man wanting to work with children is automatically assumed to have malign motives, but I suppose it is much the same with transgender people in women’s bathrooms; not worth the risk.”
Another reader, James James, expressed more pointed criticism of both the nursery and the parents involved:
“What sort of Nursery Manager would hire a 30-year-old male odd-ball to look after young children? … The hiring manager must have something wrong with her? … Maybe she was a woke liberal nutter, and wanted to tick the diversity box? She should never be allowed to work with children again. Secondly, what sort of parent sends their child to a nursery that a 30-year-old MALE odd-ball is working? What were the parents thinking?
“I think any grown man who wants to be a nursery teacher, dealing with other people’s small children, often intimately in very personal ways — i.e., toileting them, cleaning them up, changing nappies, etc. — has got something wrong with them. Clearly he was an oddball and should never have been hired. Alarm bells should have been ringing when he applied for the job! Shame on the woke diversity box-ticking oddball hiring manager.”
These comments illustrate a widespread public concern: that hiring practices, oversight failures, and ideological considerations may sometimes compromise the safety of children, underscoring the need for vigilance, discernment, and accountability in all institutions caring for the very young.
Proverbs 14:15 The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going.
Deuteronomy 6:6-9 And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart..And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up…And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.
Isaiah 49:15 Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee.
Naive Prison Officer Girl 20 Jailed Sex with Inmate
Alicia Novas (left) began an illicit relationship with prisoner Declan Winkless (right) at HMP Five Wells | NORTHAMPTONSHIRE POLICE
In January 2026, a former prison officer was jailed for engaging in a sexual relationship with an inmate, smuggling drugs and mobile phones into custody, and exposing the identity of an informant.
The offender, Alicia Novas, 20, from Raunds in Northamptonshire, was employed at HMP Five Wells in Wellingborough when the misconduct began. The inmate, Declan Winkless, 31, who was serving an 11-year sentence for conspiracy to commit burglary, also received a sentence of three years and four months, to run consecutively with his existing term.
Ms. Novas had only joined the prison in July 2024, aged 18, following training that emphasised the integrity and professionalism expected of staff. The court heard that she provided her personal telephone number to Mr. Winkless and exchanged almost 3,000 messages with him. The inmate reportedly used four illicit devices during this period and actively pursued the relationship, offering expensive gifts and demonstrating romantic interest.
The case has raised serious concerns about staff oversight and recruitment in custodial environments. It highlights how inexperience, insufficient supervision, and poor safeguards can allow positions of trust to be exploited, putting both the integrity of the prison system and the safety of its staff and inmates at risk.
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.
Women Should Not Be in Men’s Prison
Cherri-Ann Austin-Saddington, a former prison officer who had sex with a convicted rapist up to 40 times while on duty. Telegraph.
Isabelle Dale joined the prison service as a teenager, but within months, she abused her authority in shocking ways. At HMP Coldingley, she swore “undying love” to two inmates and had sex with one in the prison chapel. She later became engaged to him, conspired to smuggle drugs into HMP Swaleside, and even tattooed a prisoner’s street name on her own body.
The judge called Ms. Dale “thoroughly devious, untruthful and manipulative,” concluding she had joined the service intending to commit crimes with inmates. Her actions reveal not only personal immorality but a systemic failure in recruitment, supervision, and staff accountability.
Ms. Dale’s case is far from isolated. In the past year, prison staff including Megann Gibson, Morgan Farr Varney, Katie Evans, and even a prison governor, Kerri Pegg, have been convicted for sexual relationships with inmates. In a notorious incident, officer Linda De Sousa Abreu was filmed having sex with a prisoner in his cell while another inmate watched.
The problem is escalating. From 2017 to 2020, nine women were caught in inappropriate relationships with prisoners. Since 2021, at least 45 cases have been recorded, and investigations into staff misconduct have nearly tripled. These relationships compromise safety, encourage contraband smuggling, and fuel violence.
The recurring pattern exposes deep flaws in the prison system. High-risk positions are entrusted to individuals without sufficient oversight, while the mechanisms designed to prevent abuse are repeatedly bypassed. Until these failures.
What Shall We Then Say?
The cases of Nathan Bennett, Alicia Novas, Isabelle Dale, and other prison staff reveal a troubling pattern of not just systemic failure but abuse of power and trust. Children abused in trusted nurseries, prison officers exploiting inmates, and repeated misconduct in positions of authority expose deep rot in the institutions meant to protect the vulnerable.
These are not isolated lapses; they are symptoms of a society where moral vigilance is weak, oversight is ineffective, and the pursuit of personal gratification often outweighs duty and conscience.
When trust is routinely violated and safeguards fail, the very fabric of our communities is undermined. Innocent lives are harmed, families broken, and public confidence eroded. Such stories compel a sobering reflection: without accountability, discipline, and moral courage, our society is left vulnerable to corruption, abuse, and decay.
The Bible reminds us: Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.
Deuteronomy 6:7; Isaiah 49:15; Proverbs 1:8-9; 18:9; Mark 7:20-23; Luke 11:11-13; Rom 12:16; 1 Corinth 1:28-29; 2 Tim 1:5; Eph 6:4; 1 John 2:16; Titus 2:4.
Pray for justice and protection for the innocent, especially children and the vulnerable, that they may be shielded from those who would exploit them.
Pray for wisdom, integrity, and discernment for those in positions of authority, that they may act with courage and righteousness.
Pray for national repentance and revival, that society may restore moral values, accountability, and respect for life and the vulnerable.
Support us!
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
The UK government is set to face a lawsuit for allowing children as young as five be taught age- inappropriate topics in Relationships and Sex Education (RSE).
Equality/ Human Rights lawyer Dr Anna Loutfi, of the Bad Law Project and families of some of the children concerned (which is almost all of them!) have come together to file a class action lawsuit against the Department for Education of the UK government.
They are calling for Personal Social Health and Education (PSHE), which RSE comes under, to be abolished from schools and for parents to have the right to withdraw their children from lessons dealing with sex, health and relationships.
Speaking on GBNews, Dr Anna Loutfi said, ‘The problem is not teaching children in schools, but the issue is rogue actors posing as charities otherwise known as the third sector and these organisations are completely unregulated.
‘They produce the materials. Sometimes they are produced outside the national jurisdiction. For example, we found certain local education authorities using materials that have been taken from the United States of America, and there is no oversight on the content of these materials. Advocacy groups are picking their own ideas of what they think is okay for children to know. Parents are not allowed to be part of the discussion’, she said.
Watch the video here:
Dr Loutfi added that ‘Thanks to the third sector, we have lost control of regulation, in the same manner we would do if there had been a military coup, and we had a Junter taking control of the schools. We are not allowed to have conversations about what these materials are for.
‘ As a nation, we have lost any discernment of what age groups are suitable for certain kinds of materials. As a country and a society, we have to be discerning about what we embrace, encourage, and what we don’t.’
Unlawful to teach gender ideology and identity as fact
The Education Act 1996 is explicit that the promotion of any idea that is contentious is unlawful. By promotion, the statute maintains that contentions ideas cannot be presented as if it is the only version available in that area. It has to be a dispassionate, fair, and non-partisan presentation of the fact.
Even Section 56 (sub 403) of the Education Act 1996 states that the Secretary of State must issue guidance designed to secure that when sex education is given to registered pupils at maintained schools—
(a) they learn the nature of marriage and its importance for family life and the bringing up of children, and
(b) they are protected from teaching and materials which are inappropriate having regard to the age and the religious and cultural background of the pupils concerned.
The question is, why is this part of the law ignored by sex educators?
The Bible stresses the importance of doing things God’s way and avoiding the unruly: Proverbs 28:7 Whoso keepeth the law is a wise son: but he that is a companion of riotous men shameth his father.
And here is some of what the Bible teaches about the purpose of education: Deuteronomy 6:7 And thou shalt teach them (God’s laws) diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
Section 56/404 of the Education Act 1996 says that schools cannot keep parents from knowing about the sex education being taught to their children.
The statute says that schools should make, and keep up to date, a separate written statement of the schools’ policy with regard to the provision of sex education, and (b)make copies of the statement available for inspection (at all reasonable times) by parents of registered pupils at the school and provide a copy of the statement free of charge to any such parent who asks for one.
And yet a mother lost her case in court when she demanded a school share sex education materials, taught to her daughter, brought in by a publicly-funded third sector body with charitable status.
Under Freedom of Information laws, Clare Page requested that the lesson plan, accompanying slides, and the names of the facilitators be released after her daughter was taught that hetero-normativity was a ‘bad thing’, and that she should be ‘sex positive’ in her relationships.
The School of Sexuality Education, which hosted the class at Hatcham College, a state school in New Cross, Southeast London, refused to release the information which led to Mrs Page making legal action. But a judge said she had no right to see them.
Stonewall and Mermaids, both promoters of sodomy and transgenderism, have been especially blamed for their propaganda in schools. Dr Loutfi described them as two main actors among other charities pushing gender ideology in schools. She questioned why the UK government consults these two organisations and not other bodies with different views.
‘Why have these charities redesigned the law according to their fantasy to saying “gender reassignment” can be with any age, and anyone who goes against this, is a bigot, as against what the law says which is 18?
‘This is contrary to the Equality Act 2010, which has a list of protected characteristics on the basis of non-discrimination, one of which is “gender reassignment” (GRA 2004)’. It permits only people who are 18 and above to make this decision.’
The lawyer added that we live in a society driven by the repetition of slogans and mantras. Even government ministers and lawyers are disregarding the letter of the law and going with mantras seen on social media. However, the Department of Education should be held accountable for neglecting to address this issue which has resulted in so many young people self-harming, socially transitioning, and sometimes “medically transitioning”.
According to the sense of the Bible, it is not okay to permit “gender reassignment” at any age, let alone for children. Those who support prescribing damaging hormones to children are well described in Scripture: Job 13:4 But ye are forgers of lies, ye are all physicians of no value.
In previous articles, Christian Voice has asserted that emotions and wants during puberty are not connected to what activists refer to as “gender identity and dysphoria.” What matters is good parenting with the help of God, being watchful and discerning when something is wrong, and getting the right help without brainwashing the child with unhealthy ideologies.
In the Gospel, our Lord took it as understood that a physician would be nowhere near adolescent boys and girls with absolutely nothing wrong with them: Matt 9:12 But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.
Just what was physically wrong with Jasmine that caused a wicked surgeon to remove her perfectly healthy breasts? The answer is ‘nothing at all’. She was just growing up:
The government has delayed publishing its “transgender guidance for schools” after its legal advisors concluded it would be in breach of the Equality Act 2010.
The Prime Minister himself admitted that the long-awaited advice for teachers is still being worked on despite previously promising it would be issued before the end of the summer term. That date has now passed.
He is under pressure, say the papers, from ‘some Tory MPs and campaigners’; to ensure that the guidance stops schoolchildren changing their names, pronouns, hairstyles, and uniforms to match their preferred gender. So why is he doing nothing?
Thank God for Dr. Loutfi and other people who have had the courage to speak up
Pray that this will end in praise when RSE is abolished and righteousness restored.
Pray for the UK and our children.
Deut 6:6-7; Prov 16:12, 22:6, 25:5, 29:14; Ezek 16:49-50; Matthew 18:1-10;Psalm 127:3-5; Ephesians 6:4; 1 John 3: 7-8
We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to support or join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
The Lord used Christian Voice as four children wrongly taken into care by the London Borough of Bexley finally went home.
The Lord used Christian Voice as four children wrongly taken into care by the London Borough of Bexley in December 2015 finally went home.
A Christian family need your prayers. Their third baby was born on 2nd August 2023 at a UK hospital. Having seen stuff online, they expressed reservations about the neo-natal childhood Hepatitis vaccine due to be given to baby at 8weeks. VACCINE POLICY AND SCHEDULES HERE.
Rather than sit down with them and go through it all, the doctors called Social Services who took their baby into care with a judge making an interim order to that effect last week.
They now have a top Christian barrister representing them at a hearing tomorrow afternoon, Wednesday 16th August 2023. In the meantime they have changed their position and are willing for baby to have the hexavalent vaccine. Please pray the judge orders SS to return the baby to them. Please let us know you are praying by kindly filling in the form below or the pop-up.
Here’s a rather unpleasant twist: The mother has been expressing her milk in order to continue breastfeeding when baby is returned. But when SS allowed the couple to see their baby Friday last week, they refused to allow her to breastfeed. How cruel is that?
Seven years ago, the Lord used this ministry to reunite families. The links below concern the Walsall case, another in Milton Keynes and in the video , the Bexley case, which started it all off. That video now has 114,000 views, praise God, and those children also went home.
2Chron 19:6 And (Jehoshaphat) said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the LORD, who is with you in the judgment.
All our stories about Social Services (needs log-in): See HERE
Support Us!
We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to support or join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Het Majesty the Queen attends the Commonwealth Day Service in Westminster Abbey on 9th March 2020
Jamaica, along with the rest of the Caribbean and Africa, is threatened by what former UK Chief Rabbi Jonathan, Lord Sacks identifies as ‘Cultural Climate Change’. HIS VIDEO HERE
By the grace of God, in this article you will see how Western evils like abortion and homosexuality are driven by a handful of activists in African and Caribbean countries imbued with Western vices. They are financed by wealthy Western governments and foundations with vast sums of money which should be funding proper health care or economic development.
Christian Voice is enabling Christians both in the UK and overseas to push back against this wickedness, to pray for and to speak Biblical truth to those in power. But we need your support. To invest in this work, click here!
(By the grace of God, we originally published this article in the March 2020 edition of the Christian Voice newsletter, just after Her Majesty the Queen and dignitaries celebrated Commonwealth Day in a service in Westminster Abbey on 9th March 2020. Yes, that was just before Covid, Lockdown and mRNA vaccines! But here we bring it up-to-date.)
Cultural Climate Change
So what is Cultural Climate Change? Unlike alleged weather ‘climate change’, this one is totally man-made!
Cultural Climate Change is characterised by a disregard for the sanctity of life and the divine institution of marriage. It leads to an ice age of falling birthrates, a rising sea-level of immorality, an increase in the temperature of intolerance to prophetic warning voices and a cooling of the altruism we need to bind us together. Civilisations in the past have been here and done this, Rabbi Sacks argues. Every one of them has gone down the rubbish-chute of history, driven out by a stronger monotheistic and monogamous force. The word of God says:
Proverbs 16:12 It is an abomination to kings to commit wickedness: for the throne is established by righteousness.
If you want your nation to be blessed, those who lead you must set Jesus as their King. Scripture clearly says:
Psalm 33:12 Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD;
Living in the Days of Lot
We can also say the West is now living in the Days of Lot. In the societies of Sodom and Gomorrah, immorality in the form of sodomy was not merely tolerated but encouraged by their legal and societal structures. They also practised child sacrifice. However, the West today goes one further. It uses government foreign aid programmes and immoral charitable foundations to export its immorality, funding local activist NGOs to spread Cultural Climate Change in their countries.
Psa 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
The West also employs diplomatic pressure. One forum where this can be seen is the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting.
Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting
In previous years, pro-homosexual nations and activists within them have attempted to promote assumed LGBT rights in and around the meeting.
Australia put down a pro-sodomy motion at the CHOGM in October 2011. The United Kingdom supported it. In June 2011, Prime Minister David Cameron told a reception he gave for gay activists at No 10 Downing Street that he intended to use UK foreign aid as a lever to force recipient countries to liberalise their laws on homosexuality. His speech was reported in the UK homosexual website Pink News. This writer’s reaction to it was reported in DominicaNewsOnline. I said: ‘David Cameron needs to realise that the white man is not the fount of all wisdom’.
The Bible writers would surely call Mr Cameron a man ‘who did evil in the sight of the Lord’.
Commonwealth Secretary-General Baroness Scotland stands accused of cronyism and corruption.
Her Majesty the Queen signed a new Commonwealth Charter in 2013, which declared: ‘We are implacably opposed to all forms of discrimination, whether rooted in gender, race, colour, creed, political belief or other grounds.’ The Western nations wanted ‘sexual orientation’ included explicitly in the Charter. They lost, and will now try to argue that ‘or other grounds’ includes ‘sexuality’.
In 2015, the CHOGM elected Baroness Scotland as Secretary-General. Her Ladyship said she would use her tenure to promote decriminalisation of homosexuality in Commonwealth countries. She is now embroiled in accusations of corruption.
In 2018, Prime Minister Theresa May told the CHOGM that laws against unnatural practices were ‘wrong’. Prince William has expressed himself to be heavily pro-gay. Yet the Bible says:
Lev 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Division and Pushback
However, events around the UNFPA Nairobi Summit in November 2019, which promoted ‘Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights’ (SRHR: code for pro-LGBT and pro-abortion policies) together with Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE), exposed deep divisions between nations already engulfed by Cultural Climate Change and those threatened by it.
The Nordic Nations, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark, were the primary funders of the Summit. Moreover, no end of blond young women activists attended the Summit. In contrast, African, Caribbean and Asian nations were dismayed by the Western attempts to promote immorality. Uganda and St Lucia stood with the US to condemn the UNFPA agenda. Norway then condemned what it saw as the ‘pushback’.
Christian Voice and Kenya Christian Voice were there. We handed out leaflets condemning abortion to those going in and our activities were noticed and made a real impact in the spiritual realm.
Freedom of Speech
There is, as mentioned above, a serious impact from Cultural Climate Change on freedom of speech and expression. Legalising homosexuality leads immediately to non-discrimination laws. The next step is a law mandating public authorities to promote ‘protected characteristics’. These include ‘sexual orientation’ and transgenderism. Scripture condemns such vanities:
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
The same public authorities, and other concerns and companies, use these laws to sack Christians and others who express misgivings about homosexual practice on social media. The church also begins to exercise self-censorship.
LGBT propaganda
The experience of the UK shows that legalising homosexuality also leads to the pretence of same-sex ‘marriage’. This, coupled with the public authority duty, leads to teachers corrupting primary school children with LGBT propaganda. Yet it is parents, not teachers, to whom God gives responsibility for children’s education:
Deut 11:18 Therefore shall ye lay up these my words in your heart and in your soul, … 19 And ye shall teach them your children, speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
There is a trampling on parental responsibilities for their children’s education, even though these are enshrined not just in the Bible but in human rights legislation. In Birmingham, the courts denied parents freedom of assembly to protest against LGBT propaganda in Anderton Park and Parkfield Primary Schools.
Transgenderism
Schools in the UK are now also hotbeds of the horrors of transgenderism. The idea placed in the minds of even small children that they are ‘trapped in the wrong body’ has become so fashionable the UK government even allow doctors to prescribe hormonal drugs, ‘puberty blockers’ which interfere with children’s natural development.
Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Deut 22:5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.
Matt 19:4 And he (Jesus) answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female?
(P.S. There has more recently been a pushback against transgenderism, with the closure of the UK’s Tavistock Clinic. The UK government also want to ensure fairness in sports. But at this time of posting [January 2023], the Scottish Parliament had voted to allow anyone to switch gender, without so much as a doctor’s note. Meanwhile the UK government were proposing to criminalise anyone, even a parent, who voiced concerns over even a child’s intention to ‘transition’.)
The prize of Jamaica
J-Flag: Jamaican campaigning homosexuals
Cultural Climate Change is being pushed in Africa and Asia and across the whole of the Caribbean. However, Jamaica, the largest Commonwealth island in the Caribbean, would be a highly significant prize if judges and/or lawmakers could be browbeaten into legalising sodomy and abortion. There is money to be made, particularly from abortion. Underneath is an anti-Christian population control agenda. We shall explore that at another time…
Anyway, the propaganda appears to be working for now. An article in the Guardian in December 2018 was headed ‘Welcome to Jamaica – no longer ‘the most homophobic place on Earth.’
The article highlighted what it described as ‘the work of Jamaica Forum for Lesbians, All-Sexuals and Gays (J-Flag), the country’s largest LGBT rights organisation, which this month celebrates its 20th anniversary.’
J-FLAG
J-Flag Logo
So let us look at ‘J-FLAG’. According to its website, J-FLAG has six directors and no fewer than thirteen full-time members of staff, including a ‘Senior Youth Programme Officer’, one Sean Lord. Foreign-funded NGO jobs are among the most lucrative in the developing world. A Scottish gay charity has just admitted its youth outreach programmes amounted to grooming and sexual abuse.
Its 2017 annual report boasted of its ‘gay pride celebrations’, public visibility in its clearing beaches campaign, support from private sector companies and of being heard sympathetically in Parliament. It states that the Minister of Justice, Hon. Delory Chuck, called for decriminalisation of anti-sodomy laws, only to appear to back-track.
The Minister of Health, Dr Christopher Tufton, demanded ‘stigma and discrimination’ against ‘minority groups’ be ended. Most worrying, the Minister of Tourism, Edmund Bartlett, it says, told a London summit that Jamaica welcomes ‘LGBT travellers’. The latter bring tourism money, it is true. But they also bring heightened use of narcotics, sexual health risks and the corruption of ‘sex-tourism’ as well-heeled foreign homosexual men try to hire local boys for sex. The tourist industry is proposing a pact with the devil.
J-FLAG is also promoting feminist group ‘We-Change’, a magazine, ‘Pride ja’, a disturbing youth ‘outreach’, and a transsexual group, ‘Transwave’. They boasted of a partnership between J-Flag and ‘the Youth Division of the (Jamaica) Ministry of Youth, Sports & Culture.’
Confusing accounts
J-FLAG accounts are difficult to comprehend, even when it publishes them. It seldom lists its donors, but we’ll come to that. Its 2014 annual report lists 5,000,000 on administration, 17,500,000 pn staff, and 22,000,000 on ‘program’.
Its 2018 Annual Report showed a rise to 9,306,240 on administration, 10,133,405 on staff, and 71,811,593 on ‘program’ (p29). It does not say what currency these figures are in, which is a gross omission. It may be Jamaican dollars, which would put the listed expenditure in the £500k bracket.
Stop Press: J-Flag’s 2021 Annual Accounts listed the following wealthy international donors:
• Astraea Lesbian Foundation (US-based)
• Comic Relief/Impact (UK-based)
• GiveOut (UK-based)
• Joint United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS)
• MAC-AIDS
• Open Society Foundation (George Soros)
• The Commonwealth Equality Network (qv)
• The European Union
• The Dutch Embassy
• The Global Fund
• United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
LGBT promotion in the Caribbean
What is certain is that all the money comes from the West. The 2015/2016 Global Resources Report listed ‘Government and Philanthropic Support for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex Communities’.
The top ten funders of ‘LGBTI’ funding for Latin America, South America and the Caribbean (p6) included Hivos (a wealthy humanist foundation in the Netherlands), the EU, Ford Foundation, Open Society Foundations (founded by George Soros), Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice and the San Francisco-based Tides Foundation.
Costa Rica is being deluged with Cultural Climate Change money, $5m in 2015/16, according to the report. But second is Jamaica, with $1,785,967 pouring in. As J-FLAG is about the only and certainly the largest LGBT CSO in Jamaica, the bulk of that money must be ending up in J-FLAG coffers.
Swedish heiress Sigrid Rausing, based in the UK, is at the forefront of LGBT funding worldwide.
Donors listed
J-FLAG’s 2014 annual report listed some of its donors (p 38 – [p42 in the pdf]): Digicell Foundation, European Union, FOSI, Foundation To Promote An Open Society (sounds like a Soros set-up), Human Dignity Trust, MAC-AIDS, Rights Now, Royal Norwegian, Sigrid Rausing Trust, US State Department, York University and VIIV Healthcare. (US State Dept. money for promoting sodomy dried up under President Trump only to restart under Joe Biden.)
Sigrid Rausing Trust admits, or boasts, of having sent £480,000 to J-FLAG over the years from 2009. They gave them £240,000 over three years starting in 2018. (Stop Press: Their current grant is £300,000 over three years from 2022./)
Last year, 2019, Astraea Lesbian Foundation gave J-FLAG £500,000.
Wealthy foundations
GiveOut founder, UK gay activist Elliot Vaughn.
Astraea itself is supported by other wealthy US foundations including Arcus, Tides and Ford and has strong links to Open Society Foundations.
We see Astraea and Open Society supporting similar groups around the world, for example, South Africa’s Triangle Project (pp 39-43). Other ‘usual suspects’ also appear, such as the Germany-based Heinrich Boll Foundation.
The Edge Funders Alliance ran a conference in 2013 helpfully listing many of the Western NGOs and Foundations funding groups promoting immorality in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean.
Returning to J-FLAG, we find a UK homosexual charity, GiveOut, fund-raising for J-FLAG’s ‘Community Hub’, ‘Rainbow House’. GiveOut have also provided funds for J-FLAG’s Transwave as well as the ‘United Caribbean Trans Network’ (UCTRANS).
Abortion
Jamaica’s IPPF-funded FAMPLAN ’s logo carries worrying allusions to China’s infamous ‘one-child’ policy .
Abortion is illegal in Jamaica except, obviously, to save the life of the mother. International Planned Parenthood run the Jamaica Family Planning Association, FAMPLAN. We read FAMPLAN is an advocate of sex education in schools. That will heighten demand for contraceptives, and when they fail, abortion.
In 2005 the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute published a paper about ‘declining international funding’ for Caribbean family planning associations. Like the Jamaican LGBT-advocacy industry, FAMPLAN is totally reliant on Western funding. It’s money was coming from US-based IPPF, from the Canadian International Development Agency ‘and similar International organizations’. It received no money from the Jamaican government.
In Kenya, Marie Stopes has been caught out providing illegal abortions in its network on clinics in the country. The abortions are heavily subsidised from the West, notably some £48m from the UK taxpayer. Marie Stopes does not operate across the Caribbean. If IPPF is providing that service, we have found no evidence of it at this time of writing.
Propaganda
Nevertheless, IPPF would be well set to make a lot of money if abortion were ever legalised in Jamaica, so we should expect pro-abortion articles in the press, presentations to Parliament and similar propaganda, or ‘advocacy’ if one prefers.
Indeed, we read On an IPPF website: ‘FAMPLAN is a key player within a coalition of civil society organizations advocating for legal and policy changes related to sexual and reproductive health and rights, including the rights of LGBTQI+ individuals and women who have experienced violence. FAMPLAN also focuses on the health and rights of young people, and has been leading a collaborative effort to revise and strengthen school-based sexuality education, and remove the requirement of parental consent for youth under 18 who want to access sexual and reproductive health services.’
Whenever we read ‘sexual and reproductive health and rights’ (SRHR) alarm bells ring. The expression was prominent at the Nairobi UNFPA Summit in November 2019. It is code for liberalisation of laws around homosexuality and abortion. And we note FAMPLAN want to paint parents of under-18s out of the picture where their children’s sexual activities are concerned.
Christian response
That particular IPPF webpage is no longer available, but IPPF’s ‘Famplan’ section boasts of its Youth Advocacy Movement HERE and says HERE that despite ‘cultural barriers and stigma’ Famplan has ‘made its mark’. It is a challenge to the church in Jamaica and to Christian youth in particular. The church needs to identify these strongholds of Satan and take prayer action against them.
As well as confront evildoers, Christians are called to offer up:
1Tim 2:1 … prayers, intercessions, … 2 For kings, and for all that are in authority;
And above all to witness to their Members of Parliament and all others in public life.
Christian Voice is enabling Christians both in the UK and overseas to pray for and to speak Biblical truth to those in power. To support our work, click here!
Mass Resistance
Moving back to the LGBT agenda, Brian Camenker of US-based Mass Resistance was able to present a speech at a pro-family rally in Jamaica in 2013 hosted by Dr Wayne West.
According to the MassResistance website, ‘Camenker outlined — point by point — the progression that followed once homosexuality was legalized everywhere else — and would surely happen in Jamaica. After legalization comes: gay pride parades; non-discrimination laws; homosexuals’ adoption of children; the homosexual agenda in schools; forcing “gay marriage” on society; public funding to deal with increased homosexual-related social problems; the transgender agenda; large-scale loss of free speech; ban on counseling for kids with homosexual issues; and attacks on churches.’
Russian response
Under President Putin, Russia has been moving to a more pro-family and pro-life stance. It is one of the reasons Russia is now so hated by Western liberals.
In 2015 Russia banned Open Society Foundation from any activities in the country. Indeed, Russia now bans all organisations funded from abroad seeking to undermine the nation’s morals and corrupt its young. In 2013, Russia brought in a federal law ‘for the purpose of protecting children from information advocating for a denial of traditional family values’. Known as the ‘gay propaganda law’, this measure has already proved highly effective at preventing gay activists presenting homosexuality as a norm, or holding gay pride parades. Amnesty International and Western liberal opinion are appalled.
P.S. (Jan 2023) Yet even the UK now demands transparency around the activities of foreign powers. The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) was introduced to the National Security Bill by a government amendment in October 2022. The aim is to deter foreign power use of covert arrangements, activities and proxies, ‘where those activities are directed or carried out by entities established overseas or subject to foreign power control’.
John 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Jamaica! Stand firm!
In the face of all the well-funded international pressure to bring Cultural Climate Change to Jamaica, we should be failing in our Christian prophetic duty if we were not to issue a warning to the people of Jamaica of their need to stand firm.
This ministry is therefore available to brief those in authority, diplomats, law-makers and pastors. We were present in Nairobi in November 2019 and are currently working on submissions to members of parliament in Kenya.
In Jamaica, it seems one necessary measure is to compel NGOs and CSOs which receive money from overseas to list each such donation in their annual published accounts. Russia’s example is one that has much to commend it as well.
The CHOGM 2020
H.E. Paul Kagame President of Rwanda
Looking ahead to June 2020 and Kigali, delegates from Africa, Asia and the Caribbean should be aware at least one pro-LGBT NGO has achieved affiliate status at the CHOGM. The‘Commonwealth Equality Network’ will ensure the presence of LGBT activists in Kigali. It lists 47 of its ‘member’ LGBT groups across the Commonwealth HERE. An article in the Independent in April 2018 also listed homosexual activists from the UK, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Barbados, Malawi, Tonga, Belize, Malaysia, Seychelles and Australia. Clearly, the Commonwealth white nations are funding all the others.
The UK government may well be on ‘best behaviour’ in June 2020 as Boris Johnson focuses on trade deals. That provides an opportunity for Caribbean, African and Asian nations to put together a pro-family, pro-life resolution. High Commissioners in London could prove instrumental in deciding whether such an approach is feasible, and if so, in organising it, and if not, pondering what else should be done.
The hosting country has great influence, not least in speeches welcoming delegates. It would be helpful if President Paul Kagame could remind assembled nations of the need to respect traditional values, for example.
(P.S. The inordinate ‘lockdown’ response to Covid saw the 2020 CHOGM abandoned.)
Research
More research should be done on the funding of pro-LGBT and pro-abortion NGOs, and this ministry stands ready to do whatever the Lord calls us to do to combat the global menace of Cultural Climate Change which threatens to destroy us all.
In particular, we are able to help and even set up pro-life and pro-family groups in the Caribbean. We are already responding to Christians who are establishing Christian Voice affiliates in Africa. This is a movement to stand for righteousness and pray for those in authority whose time is long overdue. Every Christian has a duty to offer up:
1Tim 2:1 … prayers, intercessions, … 2 For kings, and for all that are in authority;
And to inform their Members of Parliament and others in public life. And to expect miracles:
2Cor 10:4 For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;
READ ALSO: Gen 19:24; Deut 4:40; 1Sam 2:20; 1Kings 15:12; 2Chron 20:12; Psalm 2:2-4, 33:12, 103:17-18; Isa 3:9; Ezek 16:49-50; Mark 9:42; Luke 17:29; Rev 7:14-17.
PRAY: For leaders in Jamaica and all the Caribbean, African and Asian members of the Commonwealth to stand firm on God’s word for human life, made in God’s image, and for the family as God has ordained it. May God pour out a blessing on those nations who fear his name and keep his righteous laws according to his promises.
We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to invest in the ministry of Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Parents' fury as primary schoolchildren are taught about the 300 different flags of Pride - including an 'intersex-inclusive' and another that celebrates polyamory | Daily Mail Online
Parents’ fury as primary schoolchildren are taught about the 300 different flags of Pride – including an ‘intersex-inclusive’ and another that celebrates polyamory | Daily Mail Online
Children as young as eleven, still navigating the simple wonders of childhood, are being inundated with explicit sexual ideologies under the guise of inclusion and diversity.
A primary school guide, distributed by Swindon and Wiltshire Pride and signposted by the local council, boasts of over 300 ‘LGBT Pride flags’ representing ‘a wide spectrum of sexualities and gender identities’ – far more, they proudly state, than there are national flags in the world.
Far from celebrating human dignity, this approach sexualises children. It is not education but indoctrination and moral confusion. The rainbow flag and its ‘pride offshoots’ is a gateway to sexual deviance. The Bible says education should come not from gay activists but from parents, and should focus not on deviance, but on God’s laws:
Deut 11:19 And ye shall teach them your children, speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
The guide—touted as an “inclusive” support resource, includes a bewildering array of flags: from the “intersex-inclusive Pride flag” to the “polyamory flag”, even a “heterosexual Pride flag” designed to affirm straight people—so long as they fit within the transgender ideology.
Among this “small selection” of 29 detailed flags are labels such as demiboy, demigirl, pangender, abrosexual, genderqueer, and others so obscure they seem engineered to bewilder.
The Bible makes a distinction between children and adults: We henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive.
Rather than helping children understand the world, this catalogue of sexual and gender identifiers draws them into an adult conversation they are not prepared for—and should not be invited into. It is not clarity, compassion or progress but the deliberate sowing of confusion.
The pride materials don’t stop at labels. They openly reference websites advising on practices such as binding breasts, using cross-sex hormones in under-18s, and “exploring the fetish spectrum”. These are not age-appropriate discussions for children—these are adult matters, rooted in practices historically linked to exploitation and harm.
One mother, a former teacher, was rightly alarmed. “This is encouraging children to think about multiple sexual partners,” she said, referencing the polyamory section. In the so-called “education” part of the guide—intended for students as well as teachers—it unashamedly recommends raising awareness of fetish identities.
Such material is not educational—it is predatory, wrapped in rainbows and platitudes. Christians must call this what it is: a form of grooming by ideology.
2 Peter 2:14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls.
Parents who voiced their concerns were met with indifference by the Labour-led local council, which chose instead to platform the Pride guide on social media. One is left asking: ‘Who is responsible for safeguarding children?’ Certainly not those who push sexual ideologies over the voices of concerned mothers and fathers.
The refusal to consult, listen, or act responsibly is an abdication of duty. Christian teaching affirms the role of parents as the primary moral guardians of their children—not the State, not lobby groups, and certainly not charities that normalise fetish culture in school settings.
If our educational structures are not built upon godly foundations, they will collapse under the weight of their own moral incoherence.
The Psalmist warns: Psalm 127:1 Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it.
Helen Joyce of the human rights group Sex Matters rightly noted that this flag obsession “recruits children into the world of sexual orientation and gender identity”. But Christians must go further: this is not merely inappropriate, it is spiritually and morally destructive.
Children should be protected, cherished, and taught to find their identity not in a spectrum of invented sexual labels.
Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
The Church must speak out boldly: our children are not experiments. They are not vessels for adult ideologies. They are precious souls, and we must not be silent as they are led astray.
Psalm 127:3 Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.
Social campaigner James Esses broke the story, sharing the pictures. But head teacher Kirsty White defended the flags, saying Westmeads is ‘an inclusive school in every sense’. ‘British Values’ have for the Kirsty totally supplanted Christian ethics: ‘We will always celebrate our diverse community through a progressive curriculum representative of British values.’
Chris Cornell, a local Labour councillor, defended the school’s decision, stating: ‘Our town is a very LGBTQ+ inclusive place and this homophobia is awful.’ One can imagine the men of Sodom criticisng ‘this homophobia’ along with Chris Cornell: Gen 19:4 … the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:
In fact, they did, complaining about Lot: Gen 19:9 … This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: …
Publishers are promoting gender confusion to tots.
Campaign groups Sex Matters and SEEN in Publishing carried out the first comprehensive report of its kind examining gender ideology in the publishing industry.
Their report found that gender ideology – the belief that being a “woman” can be independent of biological sex – has become “dominant” in the industry. The review concluded that the state of children’s publishing is “particularly concerning”.
It found a “shiny, sparkly world of trans identities” promoted to young readers, with “many aimed at toddlers”. Recent titles aimed at children include ‘Julian is a Mermaid’, ‘Are You a Boy or Are You a Girl?’, and ‘She’s My Dad’. Of 21 publishers surveyed, a fifth of their output on transgender-related products was targeted at children.
This is despite the Cass Report warning of the dangers of the ‘trans pathway’, the UK’s ban on ‘puberty blocker’ hormones and April’s Supreme Court ruling that sex is biological, not based on ‘feelings’.
The report quotes an extract from the book ‘I Am Jazz’, by Jessica Herthel and Jazz Jennings, which states: “From the time she was two years old, Jazz knew that she had a girl’s brain in a boy’s body.
“She loved pink and dressing up as a mermaid and didn’t feel like herself in boy’s clothing. This confused her family, until they took her to a doctor who said that Jazz was transgender and that she was born that way.”
This is propaganda and it should have no place in a civilised nation. Our elites have turned their backs on the Gospel and are intent on leading us all, even small children, slouching to Gomorrah. The words of the Lord Jesus echo to us down the centuries: Mark 1:15 The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
READ: Gen 1:27; Lev 19:35-37; Prov 22:6; Isa 29:16, 45:9-10; Matt 9:12; Rom 3:13; 1 Cor 14:33; Eph 6:1..
PRAY: For our children. Pray our leaders to repent and honour the King of kings. May the Lord bring the designs of evil teachers, publishers, councillors, to naught.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.
Support us!
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
School closure give parents an opportunity to inoculate their children from the LGBT propaganda circulating in schools. Lockdown is bringing much hardship, but LGBT activists must be distraught at their lack of opportunity to promote ‘two mommies’ and ‘born in the wrong body’ Opportunities for ‘Mermaids’ and other transgender lobbyists, as well as ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ have been much reduced, thank God.
The first thing to say is that school closures were unnecessary, despite the BBC running interviews with parents who think it was very sensible. It is puzzling why the Government did not spell out loud and clear to us all that school children in general are the lowest risk group for even catching Covid-19, let alone becoming a serious case?
For example, a 16-year-old girl interviewed by the BBC about the cancellation of examinations let slip she had been self-isolating. ‘Oh really’, said the presenter, ‘Was that for corona virus?’ ‘Yes,’ replied the girl, ‘I had a bit of a cough and a temperature for a couple of days. Not very nice.’ That was it. For the under-tens in particular, there have been minuscule cases and not one death in that age-group worldwide, so far as we can ascertain.
However, explaining the lack of risk from Covid-19 might not have chimed well with Covid-19 Project Fear. In any case, it is probable teachers were more worried about themselves than about their charges. However, data from China shows the few children who have fallen sick appear to have caught the virus from adults, not from other children. Children are not transmitters. There was absolutely no need to close schools.
University College London
The media have reported on a study from University College London published in The Lancet.
The academics say ‘school closures have little impact on spread of coronavirus’. The ‘small benefits’ should be ‘weighed against profound economic and social costs’.
One of the research authors, Professor Russell Viner, said: ‘Data on the benefit of school closures in the coronavirus outbreak is limited, but what we know shows that their impact is likely to be only small.
‘Additionally, the costs of national school closures are high – children’s education is damaged and their mental health may suffer, family finances are affected.’
He said policy makers should ‘weigh up the possible harms and reopen schools at the earliest opportunity’ – and not necessarily wait until September if it can be done safely sooner.
School’s out for how long?
However, Education Secretary Gavin Williamson has there will be no imminent return and head teachers have described pressure for an early return as ‘irresponsible’. School’s out for May at least. Moreover, if you choose to keep your child off for the rest of this academic year, ministers have said there will be no penalties.
If school really is out for summer, the new RSE guidelines will take effect in September this year as children do return. We are losing valuable time to hold meetings and make parents aware. ‘Gay lessons’ are right at the heart of Government plans.
Recruit-proof Your Child
7 Steps to Recruit-proof Your Child is the title of a book by Scott Lively. It was published in 1998 but is still relevant, except there is obviously no reference to the horrors of transgenderism.
The seven steps are Get Serious, Take Authority, Inform Yourself, Strengthen Your Family, Improve Your Parenting Skills, Clean House, and Be Active in Your Community.
Get Serious
Under ‘Get Serious’ Dr Lively reminds us that ‘gays recruit’. But they need a social softening-up exercise first. That is where books like ‘And Tango Makes Three’ or ‘King and king’ or ‘Two Mommies’ come in, in primary school. Mention of homosexuals as ‘minorities’ or equating opposition to homosexuality with racism also works as a pre-grooming tool.
You also need to find out what the school is teaching your child in the are of Relationships and Sex Education and demand to see materials and curriculum details. Never regard teachers as benign on this subject.
Take Authority
In this chapter, Dr Lively reminds you that you have the authority to protect you child from homosexuality. Remember Protocol 1, Article 2: Right to education states:
‘In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teaching, the State shall respect the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.’
Don’t be intimidated by political correctness, don’t let gay activists claim any moral high ground, don’t go on the defensive, don’t use the language of the gays, never say you are ‘not homophobic’, don’t defer to ‘experts’ and don’t think activists will ever be reasonable.
Inform Yourself
The title of this chapter speaks for itself. A book like my own ‘Sexual Dead-End’ will inform you about the reality of the homosexual lifestyle. However, you must also get right into the word of God and be solid about how the Almighty has designed us and given us structures of society for our good.
No, homosexuality is not ‘normal’, no geneticist will agree that anyone is ‘born that way’ and for that matter no-one is ‘born in the wrong body’ either.
Strengthen Your Family
The Lord Jesus said: Mark 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. 7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; 8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.
Even if you are for whatever reason a single parent, you are still part of a God-designed system in which a man and a women join together to become one flesh and by God’‘s grace produce children.
Strengthen your family by worshipping together. That means not just praying together, although this would be a good time to build a daily rhythm of prayer, but talking together, eating together and generally doing things together. Both parents are important in a child’s life, but as children move into puberty, a father’s influence on children becomes stronger. A daughter looks to him to see what a man is supposed to be like. He affirms her femininity. When he does things with his son, story-teller Robert Bly said: ‘something almost like food passes from the father to the son.’
The lockdown will provide us even more opportunities to do things with our children. You need also to shield your children from exposure to gay propaganda and gay characters in the media, especially on TV, and teach chastity and faithfulness.
Improve Your Parenting Skills
Improving parenting skills will start with our attitude and approach to our wife or husband. Children learn by example, so Scott Lively recommends you build an atmosphere of virtue and discipline in your own life. Always build up and encourage each other and your children, never belittle, always look for something to compliment. Recognise we are all different and there has never been anyone like you or your child in the whole history of the world.
You need also to set an example with your gender roles and embrace these as God-given. Make sure your children know acting as a man or as a woman, doing man things and woman things is not a social construct but reflects the complimentary way we have been made for each other.
Clean House
Cleanliness may be next to Godliness, but it is spiritual cleanliness Dr Lively is talking about here. Build that thorn hedge of protection around your house and do not allow anything of Satan any room in your house. Be protective, know your adversary, monitor TV viewing (if any) as well as mobile phone and social media use.
Instead of using the home-schooling material from the BBC, look online for Christian teaching materials. I saw the BBC promoting David Attenborough, so never forget part of recruit-proofing your child is sharing about the wonders of God’s creation. Here at Wernlwyd we are always amazed at how God has designed our animals, plants and the whole of our environment. We long to share that with visitors, but that will have to wait for now.
Be Active in Your Community.
Lastly, Dr Lively urges us to be active in our community. He means being prophetic, and sets out a number of issues on which Christians need to be informed and vocal. This will be second-nature to members of Christian Voice but we can all benefit from Scott Lively’s wisdom and experience of the battles he himself has fought.
The Bible shows that we should never miss an opportunity to point out how much better are the ways of the Lord to those of the world. Whenever your child asks you a question, always ask ‘Why do you ask that? to find out what is at the root of the question. Whatever subject comes up, teaching righteousness about it to our children becomes part of life:
Deut 6:7 And thou shalt teach (God’s ways) diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
So make full use of this opportunity to teach your children. You might even get used to it and decide to make it full-time. In any case, keep giving them immunity against recruitment by Satan even when, or if, they return to school.
We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings Click on the social media
Amanda Spielman Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) at Ofsted
Amanda Spielman Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector (HMCI) at Ofsted
Parents at Parkfield School in Birmingham have demonstrated overwhelming solidarity in their battle to oust a campaigning homosexual teacher. The parents took between 540 and 600 children out of school on Friday 1st March 2019. That’s out of a total roll of 740, as the Birmingham Mail reports.
The ‘No Outsiders’ project has been developed by one Andrew Moffat. The campaigning homosexual acts as ‘assistant head teacher’ at the school. No Outsiders has figured books such as ‘Mommy, Mama and Me’, ‘My Princess Boy’ and ‘King & king’ – stories about same-sex relationships and transgenderism.
No protests, please!
The head of the education inspection agency supports gay lessons. A defiant Amanda Spielman, ‘Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector’ (HMCI) at Ofsted, explained it is ‘vital’ children know about ‘families that have two mummies or two daddies’. To a decadent society, sodomy is ‘vital’.
She condemned parental protests and called for ‘sane, rational discussion’. If a policy was ‘not working well enough’ then ‘it’s proper conversation that will change it, not protests,’ she sniffed.
But protests work …
It’s breathtaking establishment arrogance. Funnily enough, the Guardian told us on Monday that Parkfield School has now stopped gay lessons, for now. In a face-saving letter to parents, the school said: ‘Up to the end of this term, we will not be delivering any No Outsiders lessons in our long-term year curriculum plan, as this half term has already been blocked for religious education (RE).’ So protests work!
But in a defiant tone, the letter went on: ‘Equality assemblies will continue as normal and our welcoming No Outsiders ethos will be there for all.’
The parents are telling Christian Voice that no child will attend any assembly or class conducted by Andrew Moffat. Here is our earlier report of their protests, which we attended.
Ofsted: ‘Outside influence’
Parkfield Community School, where gay activist Andrew Moffat has been promoting No Outsiders
Astonishingly, Ofsted later confirmed Parkfield was re-inspected after receiving a number of complaints. However, a spokesperson said: ‘We support the right of school leaders to determine the curriculum as they see fit and in the interests of their pupils – free from hostile outside influence.’ That’ll be parents, no doubt.
The ‘spokesperson’ went on: ‘All schools have a responsibility to prepare children for life in modern Britain and that includes encouraging respect for those who are different, for instance LGBT people or those of different faiths.’ And parents have a responsibility to defend and inoculate their children from gay propaganda:
Deut 6:7 And thou shalt teach (God’s words) diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
Conference in Cumbria
In an interesting development, Amanda Spielman is the headline act at an education conference in Cumbria on Monday 18th March. HMCI will speak at the Cumbrian Leading Learning research conference at West Lakes Academy in Egremont.
The conference starts at 8.30am and runs until 4.00pm. We are talking to local Christians and may hold a witness which would start from 8.00am sharp if we have enough support.
Psa 94:16 Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?
Conference in Birmingham
However, the weekend before, Education Secretary Damian Hinds is speaking on Friday 15th and Amanda Spielman on Saturday 16th March at the Association of School and College Leaders 2019 Annual Conference. It is being held in, of all places, Birmingham. Lord, how do you do that? the venue is the International Convention Centre (ICC) B1 2EA.
We’ll witness with leafleting at 8.00am on both days and also aim to be there from 4.00pm to 5.30pm for people leaving the venue.
Psa 20:5 We will rejoice in thy salvation, and in the name of our God we will set up our banners: the LORD fulfil all thy petitions.
This event is heaven-sent for a big witness! If you can, come. If not, pray!
Spielman controversies
Controversy appears to dog Amanda Spielman. An accountant with no teaching experience, never having placed her children in a state school, her appointment was roundly condemned by the Education Select Committee. Despite that, then Education Secretary Nicky Morgan MP appointed her anyway.
Luke Tryl. The gay Tory activist has enjoyed a meteoric rise.
And here’s a twist. Nicky Morgan’s education advisor at the time, gay activist and Tory Party 1hack Luke Tryl, fresh from a stint at Stonewall, went on to become head of policy, no less, at Ofsted.
SchoolsWeek says he’s just left the corrupt watchdog to become head of the New Schools Network, a Government-funded charity which advises on setting up Free Schools.
Psa 73:3 For I was envious … when I saw the prosperity of the wicked. … 8 They are corrupt, and speak wickedly concerning oppression: they speak loftily. … 17 Until I went into the sanctuary of God; then understood I their end.
The hijab crusade
This time last year, the Amanda went on a crusade – as it were- against hijabs when Neena Lall, head of St Stephen’s, an east London primary school, banned girls under eight from wearing them. She even sent inspectors to the school to show solidarity. “School leaders,” she said subsequently, “must have the right to set school uniform policies … to promote cohesion … Ofsted will always back heads who take tough decisions in their pupils’ interests.” Parents and Muslim community leaders forced the ban’s reversal anyway.
Ms Spielman pointedly called on “others in government” to give similar backing. “Muscular liberalism”, she said, was needed “to tackle those who actively undermine fundamental British values”.
That’ll be ‘fundamental British values’ like accepting sodomy. This Amanda is heading for a fall.
Prov 16:18 Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.
We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:</span
(Video Transcript:) I was going to spare you any comment on the Scarlet Blake / Fangze Wang affair, which is on our website anyway, but it’s still drawing comment, with the BBC’s Samira Ahmed agonising about it on Newswatch last Saturday morning (2nd March 2024).
But an earlier piece on Saturday’s BBC news, where presenter Naga Munchetty interviewed MP Tobias Ellwood about threats to MPs without either of them once telling viewers where the threats were actually coming from, tipped the balance.
Questioning Reality
The media / political complex are manipulating us into doubting our own sanity, into questioning reality, into believing their absurdities. Well, you’ll only get the truth here, so let me show you how it works with half-a-dozen examples. Then we’ll see what to do about it.
We’ll start with Covid, where they pretended we were all equally at risk, that bacterial handwash and crude masks could stop an air-borne virus, that experimental gene-therapies were safe, fully-tested good honest vaccines. The Bible tells us there can be such people as ‘physicians of no value’. (Find all our Bible references below.) See: ‘Lockdown a failed experiment’
They do it on abortion. Not even pro-life MPs want to rock the boat by asking their pro-abortion colleagues what exactly is that in the womb? Is that a human being? Was the psalmist right to say ‘thou hast covered ME in my mother’s womb’ or not?
They are doing it over Russia / Ukraine, repeating that the Russians and ‘Putin’ are totally evil while Ukraine, Mr Zelensky, NATO, the US and the EU are as pure as the driven snow, so Mr Sunak can quietly send billions of pounds of your money to fight his proxy war and enrich his pals in the arms firms. People trot out lines they have learnt from the BBC forgetting the psalmist said: ‘I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.’
They are doing it, as I saw on Saturday morning (2nd March 2024), over Islam, much preferring to talk about Lee Anderson’s supposed ‘Islamophobia’ than admit the threats to MPs are coming from pro-Hamas Muslims and their leftist friends, from Islamists, in other words.
They pretend there is nothing wrong with mass Muslim migration and that they can replace our Christian constitution with multiculturalism.
You have Rishi Sunak claiming the UK is ‘the world’s most successful … multi-faith democracy’. Well did the prophet say: ‘truth is perished, and is cut off from their mouth.’
They let the education establishment get away with doing it over RSE, pretending they can show what amounts to pornography to children, lying that it is ‘age-appropriate’.
They’re also gaslighting YOUR children into believing it’s just fine to be promiscuous or homosexual and perfectly normal for a girl to decide she is actually a boy and be given life-changing drugs and mutilatory surgery, despite the Lord Jesus saying ‘They that are whole need not a physician; but they that are sick.’
Which leads us finally to Fangze Wang, a deranged man who prefers to be called Scarlet Blake and pretend he is a woman, with Police, CPS, the judge and journalists colluding in his self-deception, hoping YOU won’t notice the one THEY are calling a woman is really a man. The Lord Jesus himself said God created us male and female, not ourselves.
It’s gaslighting built on absurdity. So what to do about it? Firstly, make sure YOU are rooted in the truth of both his word and current events. We’ll help you by looking behind the scenes and telling it as it is both here (our Youtube channel) and on our website so you can pray informed prayers.
Pray the Lord will raise up God-fearing men, change the hearts of the king’s ministers or replace them with men after his own heart. Pray for them to be what the Bible calls ‘able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness.’ Let’s be fully aware a general election is coming, and of what the opinion polls say, but let us never forget God does miracles. We’ll be saying, ‘this is the Lord’s doing and it is marvellous in our eyes.’
Pray for this ministry; I’ll be honest with you, we need funding! We need your support. Leave your comments below, subscribe to the channel and like and share the video. Sign the petition below, go to our webpage and leave your details, or support us below, and thanks for watching!
READ: Exod 18:21; Job 13:4b; Psa 118:23, 120:7; Jer 7:28b; Mark 10:6; Luke 5:31; Heb 1:3;
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
A girl lights a Diwali lamp or 'diya' as part of a swastika pattern for Hindu 'puja' - coming to a school near you!
A girl and her mother light a Diwali lamp or ‘diya’ as part of a swastika pattern for Hindu ‘puja’
It’s that time of year when schools are gearing up to promote the Hindu festival ‘Diwali’ with shrines to elephant gods and marks on foreheads.
A new Christian Voice resource for parents, school governors, pastors and leaders strips away the mask to reveal the darkness behind the Diwali lights.
We are giving away free copies of Diwali – a parents’ guide to everyone joining Christian Voice from September to November. Get this resource now, before the diyas are lit and the puja (that’s Hindi for worship) begins.
The idea behind modern multi-cultural religious education is that all faiths are valid paths to the same God or god. Since light is an element of many faiths, different festivals of ‘light’ or ‘lights’ are used to show that the different religions are really just the same.
The truth behind Diwali – the ‘festival of lights’
Diwali celebrates the mythical home-coming of Rama and Sita in which the people lit diyas to show them the way.
According to one Hindu source we quote in Diwali – a parents’ guide, “Diwali symbolises the destruction of evil and the return of peace and happiness … a celebration of the triumph of good over evil.”
As the children sit by their shrines to the elephant god in classrooms up and down the land, their parents won’t be told that Rama, according to the Hindu scriptures, went on to marry many other women as well as Sita, mutilated and tortured women, called his father a fool and an idiot and burnt the Dravidians of Sri Lanka alive. So much for peace and happiness.
Hinduism’s social darkness
The demon goddess Durga is depicted with lethal weapons in her ten hands, and is said to delight in ‘wine, flesh and sacrifice’.
Nor will they be told, as their children paint red tilak dots on each others’ foreheads, about the Hindu caste system which keeps millions of families in permanent bondage, about dowry murders of young brides, about female infanticide nor about the ritual slaughter of buffalo and horses to appease the Hindu goddess Durga.
In all the talk of light, no school will own up to the darkness of Hindu violence over the thousands of Dalits (or ‘Untouchables’) converting to Christianity nor about how the idea of reincarnation and ‘karma’ means that beggars must be left to suffer for their sins in a previous life.
But we’ll tell you, in Diwali – a parents’ guide.
We’ll give you all the background to the Diwali festival, set out the Hindu belief system with its demonic ‘trinity’, explain how the caste system keeps one racial group in permanent ascendancy, and show you how the Hindu faith works out in practice.
Armed with this information, parents, grandparents, school governors, ministers of the Gospel, pastors and leaders can help support teachers refuse to celebrate Diwali. And if a school persists with the festival, parents have the right to take their children out of lessons. And if you are a teacher – or just interested in religious education – you need this valuable resource.
Diwali – a parents’ guide is free when you join Christian Voice from September to November 2012.
Read our aims and stament of faith and find out how you can join Christian Voice here (clicking on the link below does not commit you to joining):
Just two of the many relevant scriptures we quote in Diwali – a parents’ guide:
Exod 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them.
John 8:12: Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.
Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.
Ambassadors of eleven nations held a press conference to condemn the ICPD25 Nairobi Summit and UNFPA
Ambassadors of eleven nations held a press conference to condemn the ICPD25 Nairobi Summit and UNFPA
A joint statement by eleven nations on the last day of the UNFPA Summit in Nairobi condemned UNFPA without mentioning the UN population agency by name.
The UN’s Fund for Population activities had hoped the jamboree would pass off without controversy. They wanted to counter ‘the push-back’ against homosexuality and abortion in the developing world. They would be disappointed.
(All our links open automatically in a new tab, on desktops & laptops, anyway.)
Press conference
Firstly, the United States, flanked by ambassadors from Brazil, Belarus, Egypt, Haiti, Hungary, Libya, Poland, Senegal, St. Lucia, and Uganda, held a press conference on 14th November 2019.
The US Special Representative for Global Women’s Health, Valerie Huber read a Statement. This reminded ‘both those gathered and those watching’ of the original aims of ICPD. The International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) was held in Cairo in 1994. Its stated objectives and actions seem dated now. They saw ‘critical challenges and interrelationships between population and sustained economic growth’. They placed it ‘in the context of sustainable development.’
Before the Statement, the Press Conference heard from Kenyan MPs Hon Chris Wamalwa, and Hon Jennifer Shamalla. Although Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and Deputy William Rutu steered clear of abortion and homosexuality when opening and closing the Summit respectively, these two MPs gave the press corps both barrels.
Parallel Conference
Secondly, Kenya Christian Professionals organised their own conference and also issued a statement. International ambassadors also addressed one session.
According to C-Fam, ‘The parallel conference included a high-level intergovernmental event with government representatives of the United States, Hungary, Poland, Brazil, Kenya and the Holy See Nuncio. They affirmed their governments commitment to policy that foster strong families and protects unborn life and criticized UNFPA for going beyond the mandate established at the ICPD 25 years ago.
The concern of the Eleven was that UNFPA and the Scandinavian nations behind the 2019 Nairobi Summit were taking the 1994 Cairo Declaration too far.
A pre-summit document from UNFPA spoke of an ‘ambition’. This was ‘how countries can move towards universal access to sexual and reproductive health and rights’. That would be ‘an essential part of universal health coverage’.
‘Sexual rights’ is shorthand for liberalising laws against homosexuality, while ‘reproductive rights’ refers to abortion.
1994 Cairo Declaration
Helpfully, UNFPA itself carries the original 1994 Cairo Declaration on its website. There are three mentions of ‘reproductive health’. All are in the context of family planning. But national governments must respect ‘their own national and cultural identity, values and tradition’.
There is no mention of ‘reproductive rights’, ‘sexual health’ or ‘sexual rights’ in the Cairo Declaration at all. Consequently there is no ‘reproductive right’ to abortion’. However the Declaration was not explicitly pro-life. It called upon national Governments ‘to reduce the need for abortion by providing universal access to family planning information and services.’
Contraception increases abortion
The Declaration blithely assumes that ‘access to family planning information and services’ reduces ‘the need for abortion’. However, that is simply not true.
Eighteen years before Cairo, British abortionist Dr Judith Bury, of Brook Advisory Centres, let the cat out of the bag. In 1981 she said “…women…have come to request [abortions] when contraception fails. There is overwhelming evidence that, contrary to what you might expect, the provision of contraception leads to an increase in the abortion rate.”
Comprehensive Sexuality Education
The Nairobi Summit was also promoting what is termed ‘Comprehensive Sexuality Education’ or CSE. This assault on the innocence of children figures nowhere in the Cairo Declaration.
Indeed, education in the Declaration had one single purpose. It was set solely in the context of increasing the wellbeing of women and girls. It would do that by bettering their health-care and developing their opportunities. Yes, it spoke of the feminist mantra of ‘women’s empowerment’. But ‘sex education’ of any kind was not there.
ICPD Program of Action
The UNFPA draw heavily on the ICPD Program of Action. This document, parallel to the Cairo Declaration, runs to 296 pages. It does contain references to ‘reproductive rights’ but these are nowhere defined, let alone to include a supposed ‘right’ to abortion. Indeed, the Government of Honduras entered a reservation in the document to clarify matters. It said the terms “‘reproductive rights’ and ‘sexual rights'” … “do not include ‘abortion’ or ‘termination of pregnancy’.”
There is no reference to ‘legalisation of abortion’ or ‘legal abortion’. Indeed, the Programme states:
‘7.24 Governments should take appropriate steps to help women avoid abortion, which in no case should be promoted as a method of family planning, and in all cases provide for the humane treatment and counselling of women who have had recourse to abortion.’
Consensus
The Program of Action was passed by consensus. It was then ‘endorsed by the United Nations (UN) General Assembly in its resolution 49/128 of December 19, 1994.’ ‘Consensus’ is important in interantional law. If enough nations agree on something it begins to have a certain standing.
Therefore the 2019 Statement of the Eleven nations clarifies this point. ‘UN Member States were able to join consensus because the ICPD Program of Action preamble paragraph 1.15 made clear that the conference did not create any new international human rights, and that “the implementation of the recommendations contained in the Programme of Action is the sovereign right of each country, consistent with national laws and development priorities, with full respect for the various religious and ethical values and cultural backgrounds of its people, and in conformity with universally recognized international human rights”.’
Ambiguous terms
When it came to the ‘rights’ element in the context of ‘consensus’ the Eleven did not hold back. ‘We are also concerned about the content of some of the key priorities of this Summit. We do not support references in international documents to ambiguous terms and expressions, such as sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), which do not enjoy international consensus, nor contemplates the reservations and caveats incorporated into the Cairo outcome.
‘In addition, the use of the term SRHR may be used to actively promote practices like abortion. There is no international right to abortion; in fact, international law clearly states that “[e]veryone has the right to life” (e.g. Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights). ‘
No transparency
The 2019 Statement also condemned the Nairobi Summit for lack of transparency and inclusiveness. Cairo ‘was negotiated and implemented with and by the entire UN General Assembly membership’. In contrast, ‘only a small handful of governments were consulted on the planning and modalities of the 2019 Nairobi Summit’. (Mostly it was the Scandinavians.)
It follows, ‘outcomes from this summit are not intergovernmentally negotiated, nor are they the result of a consensus process. As a result, they should not be considered normative, nor should they appear in future documents as intergovernmentally-agreed language.’
Pro-family and pro-life nations will no doubt be on the alert for any sign of UNFPA language creeping in international documents. UNFPA will never bring its works to the light of the full UN. The Statement of the Eleven is clear. Without such universal acceptance, ‘no ICPD follow-on document has consensual weight or standing amongst governments.’
The value of Trump
It is worth saying that such a statement would never have been possible if Hilary Clinton had been elected President of the United States in 2016, the Statement of the Eleven would never have happened. It is only because of the staunch pro-life stand of the Trump administration that the 2019 Nairobi Summit was so roundly condemned.
So Almighty God plays a long game, and we should praise his name for all he did during the Summit. We were able to give out around 2,000 pro-life leaflets peacefully to delegates queuing for the Summit. Most were distributed on the opening day, Tuesday. And when we do the little things, we can leave it to the Lord to work miracles. The Statement of the Eleven is one of those things only God can organise.
Just remember, there is all to pray for as the US elections 2020 come ever closer.
Dan 2:21 And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding:
