A Christian family need your prayers. Their third baby was born on 2nd August 2023 at a UK hospital. Having seen stuff online, they expressed reservations about the neo-natal childhood Hepatitis vaccine due to be given to baby at 8weeks. VACCINE POLICY AND SCHEDULES HERE.
Rather than sit down with them and go through it all, the doctors called Social Services who took their baby into care with a judge making an interim order to that effect last week.
They now have a top Christian barrister representing them at a hearing tomorrow afternoon, Wednesday 16th August 2023. In the meantime they have changed their position and are willing for baby to have the hexavalent vaccine. Please pray the judge orders SS to return the baby to them. Please let us know you are praying by kindly filling in the form below or the pop-up.
Here’s a rather unpleasant twist: The mother has been expressing her milk in order to continue breastfeeding when baby is returned. But when SS allowed the couple to see their baby Friday last week, they refused to allow her to breastfeed. How cruel is that?
Seven years ago, the Lord used this ministry to reunite families. The links below concern the Walsall case, another in Milton Keynes and in the video , the Bexley case, which started it all off. That video now has 114,000 views, praise God, and those children also went home.
2Chron 19:6 And (Jehoshaphat) said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for the LORD, who is with you in the judgment.
The Lord does answer prayer!
Walsall dither over child care case →
Social Services tell girls: ‘No Nightie? Wear my Tee-shirt!’ →
All our stories about Social Services (needs log-in): See HERE
Support Us!
We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to support or join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
I have just now prayed for the Christian family suffering under Social Service tyrants, who are keeping the family’s baby as if it’s a piece of illicit property because the parents refuse a state-forced vaccine on the baby. This is the direction we are moving in. Clear End Times.
After being foster carers for 14 years we know first hand the corruption behind it.
I thank God that he used us many times within that system to help fight for families to be reunited and many times praise God we did succeed.
Eventually we had to leave and our story was featured on the BBC. The media were so afraid of the family courts that they didnt even name the local authority involved and burred our faces on camera too. Something seriously needs to change here from a governmental level which is what inspired both my husband and I to get involved in politics.
https://youtu.be/WXMYJmZoY1s
Praying for this family – that the baby will be returned swiftly and no harm done.
This is very disturbing news – have been praying fervently for the Lord to deliver their beloved child back to them. The parents acted very conscientiously and wisely in being cautious about the vaccine – as parents should about any pharmaceutical product they are going to pump into such a small child. It hardly helps confidence in the vaccines if loving parents have to be so cruelly blackmailed in this way. We need to fight not only for the swift return of their child – but also the parents right to refuse the vaccine, as they do have a legal right to do.
Thanks for spreading this story, I did not have enough time to make it to the court but am praying. Something called The Nuremberg Code can help those who are correctly vaccine sceptics. This international treaty/code (a bit like the European Convention on Human Rights) states that no state or medical service can force or coerce anyone into having any medication against their will. It was brought in following WW2 when the allies found out that the nazis were forcing people to have various medical products (as experiments I think).
I am not sure if you can use this as parents for your baby/child but it is worth trying. As an adult definately use it; they cannot force any of us to take a medication we do not want – ultimately it’s our God given body and our God given right to decide what we put into it.
As Christian Voice has proved time and again, when even a few people turn up to the court, suddenly all those involved start behaving themselves, they are very concerned when ordinary people turn up wanting to check what the powers are doing.
The Nuremberg Code should apply but UK authorities have a blind spot to it. I would have thought members of public would not be able to attend family court hearings? Do you mean just to stand outside the court and witness?
Stephen – are there are any further known factors involved in the SS’s actions (troubled background etc) or is this purely down to the parental choice not to vaccine? You don’t have to reveal anything confidential – and I’m sure it’s still a great injustice – but this will help us to understand and pray for all that needs praying into accordingly.
We know the family. It appears to be just the vaccine question. But the vaccine is optional in Wales as in England (as in Scotland and N.I. I believe) so it could be just SS over-reach. They are scheduled for court at 4pm.
Thanks, praying now, do let us know outcome.
This is such a heart breaking story to read , my thoughts and prayers go out to this couple . I pray that our God Almighty hears our prayers and restores their child safely back into their loving arms .
I miss my child after one day of not being able to see him for what ever reason so I can’t imagine the heartache this couple must be feeling right now . Lord bring this to an end without delay in Jesus name I pray
Amen 🙏🏻
Hi, I have been away. In answer to your question Ezekiel, yes the family courts where this case would have been heard are very closed and often the hearings are restricted to the legal representatives and the parent(s)/Carer/Guardian. Sometimes even they are not allowed in, that is, to the actual courtroom where the hearing is going on in front of the judge. This kind of restriction has been brought in but needs to be challenged because the basic presumption in English law is that court hearings must be open to public scrutiny. That includes tribunals – there are loads of those, I teach law and I am constantly discovering new tribunals I had never heard of.
An accredited journalist can often get into the courtroom but only with permission of the judge and the lawyers may object. As Stephen is an accredited journalist he may be in a good position to report on these things but the next problem is the reporting restrictions which are usually very restrictive – sometimes orders have been made that even the existence of the hearing cannot be disclosed.
You can however, turn up at the court, ask for permission to sit in the actual courtroom hearing as a friend or supporter of the parent/guardian etc. If so, the judge may tell you you can’t say anything about the case especially on social media, but that does not stop us praying.
If getting into the actual courtroom is impossible, all courts have public waiting areas outside the courtroom but inside the court building – we can sit there. I believe that the physical presence of supporters helps the victims of these courts know they are not alone – that is very important.
It also communicate to the lawyers and judge that we are alert to what is happening and there is less chance of a major injustice happening. The worst thing we can do – is nothing. I strongly believe in the power of turning up at courts when Christians or ordinary people are being put through these things. Just a simple, dignified presence becomes very powerful.