'Naomi' Hersi - murdered by an 'idiot' after a consensual three-day drugs-fueled orgy.
Flyer for Transgender Day of Remembrance
20th November, which in 2018 falls on Tuesday, has been designated Transgender Day of Remembrance.
This year it was taken most seriously of all in Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
Newcastle City Council, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, the local ambulance service and Northumbria University all supported a day conference in the University’s historic Sutherland Building on College Street.
Gender diversity
Outreach Cumbria, the other side of northern England, published a flyer, which we reproduce opposite.
On it we read: ‘Trans Lives North East is a ground-breaking conference which brings together professionals from partner organisations in all sectors for a day of learning centered around gender diversity and transgender people.’
Northumbria University’s ‘Sutherland Building’ – the one the policewoman told us not to film!
‘On this day’, it goes on, ‘we commemorate the loss of those killed by transphobic violence or suicide resulting from political inaction maintaining a violently discriminatory social system.’
Equalities industry out in force
There were speeches by ‘keynote speakers’:
Jennifer Black; Unison Branch Chair and Equalities Officer
Lucy Malarky; Director of Housing Association ‘Gentoo’
‘Tara Stone’; A Stonewall transgender paid activist
Dr Anna Laws; Clinical Psychologist, Gender Identity Clinic
The aim was ‘to work together across organisations after the event to take the work forward and implement changes in each organisation’ those attending represent.
The event ran from 9.30am – 4pm.
Mock service
And then in the evening, at 7pm, ‘Northern Heart’ held a mock ‘service’ to ‘honour and remember those we have lost to transphobia.’
This consisted of Stonewall propaganda and songs like ‘He ain’t heavy’ and ‘Born this way’ (yawn) from a homosexual choir, who outnumbered the rest. Although held in a church there was no prayer and the minister, having allowed the building to be used, wisely kept well out of it. Just one ‘trans-woman’ attended and two sad little ‘trans-men’ with their compulsory straggly moustaches.
When it came to the ‘act of remembrance’, there was one UK-based name read out amid all the South American prostitutes, that of ‘Naomi’ Hersi (see below). Prostitution is a dangerous occupation at the best of times, especially so for men masquerading as women. Having lit their candles, the assembled gays and lesbians could not even manage to rise to their feet for their ‘minute’s silence’. It was pathetic.
Honestly, guys, us Christians serve the Lord of heaven and earth. Spiritually we are well able to trounce this lot. We just need to join battle. We only need the spirit of Caleb!
Numb 13:30 And Caleb stilled the people before Moses, and said, Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it.
‘Can’t film buildings’ – police
The event notice in the portico of ‘Sutherland Building’
This author travelled to Newcastle to investigate ‘Transgender Day of Remembrance’ and ask if it was based at all on fact.
We had not even handed out any leaflets at the venue. All we had done was take some video footage of Sutherland House and the notice it was displaying.
But that was enough for the organisers to call the police. A police constable attended and told us we could not film the buildings. So much for programmes on architectural heritage. Of course that was nonsense, but it shows how the establishment cannot allow any opposition to the transgender agenda.
We completed the filming, in which we’ll take issue with the impertinence and fraud of the hook on which this campaigning event has been hung.
Real Day of Remembrance
Firstly, there is a real Day of Remembrance across the world. We observed it on Sunday 11th November at 11.00 am. We remembered the fallen of two world wars and those who have given their lives for their families and friends in wars ever since.
To claim some moral equivalence between people sadly murdered on the street, for whatever reason, and the gallantry of those who fought on the Western Front or defended our freedom in the deserts of North Africa is grotesque. It’s an insult to their memory. Moreover, holding such an event in the month of the centenary of the end of the First World War displays crass insensitivity, arrogance and narcissism. It shows how LGBT activists cannot adhere to any recognised standards of civilised behaviour.
But the second major problem is this. Wikipedia, you will be pleased to know, has a special page (linked here) for Transgender Day of Remembrance. It lists ‘unlawfully killed transgender people’. It’s a confusing read because you have to keep remembering that ‘him’ usually means ‘her’ and ‘her’ means ‘him’.
The Canadian province of Ontario passed, unanimously, the Trans Day of Remembrance Act, 2017 last December. It officially recognised Transgender Day of Remembrance. It also requires the Legislative Assembly of Ontario to hold a moment of silence every year on 20th November. The first will be held this year. The nations have gone insane. But we digress.
No UK victims of transphobic attacks at all.
To add to the Wikipedia page, there is a special website, called Transgender Day of Remembrance. Each person listed on the site, so we read, ‘was a victim of violence based on bias against transgender people.’
Except they weren’t. It just is not true that every one of them was killed by ‘trannie-bashers.’ When you search the lists for those murdered in the United Kingdom, for example, there are just five from year 2000 to 2018. What is more, not one of them, not a single one, was actually killed in a ‘transphobic’ attack.
‘Naomi’ Hersi – murdered by an ‘idiot’ after a consensual three-day drugs-fueled orgy.
In 2018, Hersi Mohammed Hersi (a ‘trans-woman’) was murdered by a hook-up after a three day consensual drug-fueled orgy. His assailant, Jesse McDonald, told his girlfriend afterwards he had been an ‘idiot’. There was no hint of ‘transphobia’. In 2016 ‘William’ Lound was murdered after witnessing a violent attack by one homeless man (a paranoid schizophrenic) on another.
In 2013, ‘Jacqueline’ Cowdrey died after a fight but the death went unexplained. In 2010 David ‘Sonia’ Burgess was pushed under a train by a transgender acquaintance. Finally, back in 2000, ‘Christine Chappel’ was murdered by his ex-wife’s brother and his ex-wife was also convicted.
For full details of all five cases on our website CLICK HERE.
Attacks by Transgenders
But on the other side of the equation, should people at large fear attacks from transgender individuals? We are still compiling this section, from huge numbers of reported cases, but here is the very latest at this time of writing, from just last week:
On 9th November 2018, the Sun reported on a gang of transgender ‘women’ who ‘battered, kicked and stamped on a man after ‘minor row’.’ The Sun said: ‘Tylah-Jo Bryan, Michael O’Docherty (who uses the name Tamzin Lush) and Amarnih Lewis-Daniel set upon the man at London’s Leicester Square tube station at 2.15am on June 24.
‘The three women were born male. Mother-of-four Hannah Bryan, 22, also joined in the assault after the gang had spent the night drinking. They targeted their victim after a “minor provocation”.’
‘In the vicious attack, the women (sic) could be seen repeatedly stamping on the man’s head as he lay face down on the floor. After the sustained attack, the man was left splayed out on the ground. It left the man, who was not named in court, with a black eye and cuts.’ He spent time in hospital. The nature of the altercation was not specified. Perhaps the man told them they weren’t really women. After a night drinking, that might be all it took.
And we reported on Karen White, aka rapist Stephen Wood, placed in a women’s jail where he sexually assaulted two vulnerable inmates, on our website here. He was sentenced only last month.
Trans grooming of children
Meanwhile, just this weekend, the Mail on Sunday reported on a teacher’s claims that no fewer than 15 pupils in her secondary school are now ‘transgender’. The whistle-blower said it has become fashionable to be transgender and that such characters were gaining huge followings on YouTube. Furthermore, most of the pupils were girls pretending to be boys and many of them were also autistic, or on that spectrum.
She says in one human biology lesson one of the ‘trans’ pupils pulled her up and told her: ‘Boys can have periods, too’. The teacher could not even respond with the obvious common-sense riposte for fear of disciplinary measures. Our society is going mad. We have a death-wish. It’s institutionalised insanity.
And psychiatrist Bob Withers, who is not even a straight down the line Christian, wrote a supporting, scathing, article. ‘In 20 years we’ll look back on the rush to change our children’s sex as one of the darkest chapters in medicine’, writes the doctor, who has thirty years’ experience. Furthermore, he says, no-one in psychiatry’s august bodies has the courage to speak up. They will be drowned out or browbeaten by the ‘trans lobby’.
We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Royal wedding. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle leave St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle after their wedding.
Royal wedding. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle leave St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle after their wedding.
It’s always uplifting to have a royal wedding! We celebrate the holy matrimony of Prince Harry of Wales and Meghan Markle. They have become Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Romans 2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God.
Purpose of Marriage
It is worth reminding ourselves of what the Dean of Windsor told the Congregation. There was no nod towards the abomination of gay marriage in Dr David Conner’s introduction. He said, according to the Order of Service:
The Dean of Windsor David Conner greets the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge at an earlier Matins Service at St George’s Chapel
‘Marriage is a gift of God in creation through which husband and wife may know the grace of God. It is given that as man and woman grow together in love and trust, they shall be united with one another in heart, body and mind, as Christ is united with his bride, the Church.
‘The gift of marriage brings husband and wife together in the delight and tenderness of sexual union and joyful commitment to the end of their lives. It is given as the foundation of family life in which children are born and nurtured and in which each member of the family, in good times and in bad, may find strength, companionship and comfort, and grow to maturity in love.
‘Marriage is a way of life made holy by God, and blessed by the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ with those celebrating a wedding at Cana in Galilee. Marriage is a sign of unity and loyalty which all should uphold and honour. It enriches society and strengthens community. No one should enter into it lightly or selfishly but reverently and responsibly in the sight of almighty God.’
Power of love
Bishop Michael Curry makes a point in an impassioned sermon
It is safe to say few present have heard an black American pastor in full preaching flow. Rt Rev Michael Curry is presiding bishop of the US Episcopal Church. Dr Curry waxed eloquent on
“The late Dr Martin Luther King Jr once said, and I quote: ‘We must discover the power of love, the redemptive power of love. And when we do that, we will make of this old world a new world, for love is the only way.’
“There’s power in love. Don’t underestimate it. Don’t even over-sentimentalise it. There’s power, power in love,” he said.
Zara Tindall sat glued to her seat as Bishop Michael spoke of the power of love.
He went on, transfixing Mrs Zara Tindall in the process:
“Ultimately, the source of love is God himself: the source of all of our lives. There’s an old medieval poem that says: ‘Where true love is found, God himself is there’.
“The New Testament says it this way: ‘Beloved, let us love one another, because love is of God, and those who love are born of God and know God. Those who do not love do not know God.’ Why? ‘For God is love.'”
World affairs
Dr Curry applied the power of love to world affairs:
“Imagine governments and nations where love is the way. Imagine business and commerce where love is the way.”
He said: “Imagine this tired old world where love is the way. When love is the way – unselfish, sacrificial, redemptive.
“When love is the way, then no child will go to bed hungry in this world ever again.
Citing Amos 5:24, he went on: “When love is the way, we will let justice roll down like a mighty stream and righteousness like an ever-flowing brook.
Royal Wedding preaching
The Bishop even preached the Gospel:
“‘There is a balm in Gilead to make the wounded whole, there is a balm in Gilead to heal the sin-sick soul.’
“And one of the stanzas actually explains why. They said: ‘If you cannot preach like Peter, and you cannot pray like Paul, you just tell the love of Jesus, how he died to save us all.”‘
“Oh, that’s the balm in Gilead! This way of love, it is the way of life. They got it. He died to save us all.
“He didn’t die for anything he could get out of it. Jesus did not get an honorary doctorate for dying. He didn’t… he wasn’t getting anything out of it. He gave up his life, he sacrificed his life, for the good of others, for the good of the other, for the wellbeing of the world… for us.
Watch in the days ahead
Nevertheless, we need to stay focused in the days ahead. The Duke and Duchess have generated much warmth towards the royal family and themselves. We need to pray Satan does not use that warmth against the Gospel.
It is no secret the new Duchess is a feminist. That anti-Christian movement sets up an ungody, unseemly competition between men and women.
The Washington Post says: On her new page on the British monarchy’s official website — in pulled out quotes — the woman now known as the Duchess of Sussex says, “I am proud to be a woman and a feminist,” referencing a line from a 2015 speech she gave at a United Nations event.
According to the Independent, ‘Her biography explains that early experiences of campaigning helped form a “lifelong commitment” to “social justice” and “women’s empowerment”.’
The ‘Post’ reminds her: ‘she will be expected to stay clear of party politics. She once called President Trump a “misogynist” and posted an anti-Brexit picture on her (now-deleted) Instagram feed. These kinds of political interventions are now a no-no, but many are curious to see whether she will continue to speak out on feminism and racial issues.’
No feminism and no ‘LGBT’!
Forget ‘racial issues’. The real problem comes if the Duke and Duchess begin to use their celebrity status to advance the feminist cause. Will they set women and men against each other, disadvantaging the poor as a whole? Feminism is easy to do as a duchess. It is not so easy in a village in Africa where people divide up jobs according to gender because doing it God’s way works.
An even greater mistake would be for the pair to push in any way for LBGT rights. Getting some transsexuals photographed with their royal highnesses is going to right up there on the activists’ agenda. But that is the way of man, not the way of God. It is the way of division, selfishness, rampant individualism and hatred of society and all that is holy. It is not the way of love – or the way of justice.
let’s be topical for a moment, because Christ is King of the here and now. Telling a confused teen they are a different gender and giving them puberty-blocking hormones is not loving. It is child abuse.
Pray into all this. Thank God firstly for the gift of marriage. Secondly, thank God for all his created social institutions and for our gender roles. Thirdly, pray for their royal highnesses to stay loyal and, well, married.
And fourthly, pray they stay not just out of party politics. Pray they keep away from all anti-Christian issues. May they not be found in the temple of Baal, advancing evil. This ministry will be watching, by God’s grace. May God break in on Harry and Meghan and convert them to his cause instead.
Even, perhaps we shall be so bold as to pray, as Dr Curry concluded:
“My brother, my sister, God love you, God bless you, and may God hold us all in those almighty hands of love.”
We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Maidstone Magistrates Court heard this case of a father involved in a rooftop protest at Medway Council.
Maidstone Magistrates Court heard this case of a father involved in a rooftop protest at Medway Council.
A father fighting for the return of his son appeared in court today on a charge of aggravated trespass.
Occupied porch roof
Maidstone magistrates heard Eugene Lukjanenko occupied the porch roof at Medway Council’s offices in Gun Wharf, Chatham, on 5th September 2017.
But whether his trespass was ‘aggravated’ was the question. Only if it was proved to be ‘aggravated’ would his actions contravene the criminal law. Furthermore, the evidence of Medway council employee Perry Holmes could have a bearing.
Mr Holmes filed a statement on 16th October 2017. Mr Lukjanenko expected him to attend court. The prosecutor told the court council business was disrupted. But defence barrister Owen Greenhall said it appeared any disruption was minimal. Council employees merely had to gain access through another door. The evidence of Medway’s Mr Holmes went ‘to the heart of the matter’, he said.
The prosecutor said she had received no request from the defence for her witness to attend. She complained she only received what is known as a ‘skeleton argument’ from the defence the day before trial.
Prosecution sprung new evidence
Barrister Owen Greenhall specialises in defending protesters.
However, it emerged in court that she herself only served video evidence recorded by a police officer that morning. Mr Greenhall was faced with trawling through 45 minutes of video recording. The protest law specialist thought some of the footage could be helpful to his client.
This is not the first time prosecutors have sprung evidence on the defence at the last minute. In January this year, a string of sexual offence cases collapsed because the police or CPS held back evidence. And in all the cases, it helped the defence.
Not surprisingly, chairman of the magistrates Julian Green granted the defence an adjournment.
The case returns on 13th June for a review and to set a new date for trial.
Protest against forced adoption
Eugene Lukjanenko occupied the porch roof over the entrance to the council offices. A group of people on the ground also protested against forced adoption & foster care.
Two police cars were called to the protest, where four people were spotted handing out leaflets. A spokesman from the police said: ‘Officers have been made aware of a protest on a roof in Dock Road, Chatham. Officers were called to the scene at 7.21am on Tuesday 5 September 2017.’
One protester told the local KentOnline newspaper they were calling on the government to investigate the way in which children are taken into care.
Mr Lukjanenko came down from the roof voluntarily at 7.30pm the same evening. He was arrested and later charged.
Contempt of court
Eugene Lukjanenko was convicted of contempt at Canterbury County Court in January and July 2017 and again in November, when he was sent to jail.
In March this year, Mr Lukjanenko was released after spending four months in jail for contempt of court. Eugene Lukjanenko was convicted of contempt of court at Canterbury County Court in January and July 2017. Judge Richard Scarratt handed him suspended sentences. But in November 2017 he was again found guilty. This time he was sentenced to eight months in prison. Mr Lukjanenko served the time in Elmley Prison on the Isle of Sheppey.
The judge found the Ukrainian concert pianist guilty of a number of breaches of court orders. They included naming social workers. Elsewhere that is an allowable freedom of speech. Mr Lukjanenko also enabled so-called ‘jigsaw’ identification of his son. The court heard no evidence that his son, aged fourteen, had actually been identified. But the secrecy of the family court has to be protected.
‘J’ first taken into care in 2010
The story started in 2010 when Mr Lukjanenko’s son, ‘J’, as we must call him, was taken into care for the first time. His father, who is a single parent, left his son, 8 at the time, home alone. ‘J’ got into some trouble with a neighbour’s son. The latter climbed into the garden and set fire to a shed with ‘J’ in attendance. The fire brigade attended and put out the small fire.
It then emerged Mr Lukjanenko had left ‘J’ alone in the house. Rather than warn Mr Lukjanenko not to leave his son alone again, Medway Council took his son away. There is little evidence the Council tried to keep this family together. That is what social workers are supposed to do, except in the most extreme cases of abuse or neglect.
Medway Council allowed violent videos
Medway Council allowed ‘J’ to watch video games which inspired Norwegian neo-Nazi Anders Breivik
Moreover, if there was ever a case for a local authority working with a parent to keep a family together, this was it. They complain they do not have the money to pay staff to spend hours working with a family. Instead, Medway Council took ‘J’ into care at huge cost to the taxpayer.
According to friends of the family, Mr Lukjanenko’s son suffered horrific emotional abuse at the hands of Medway Council while being in care. They say Medway allowed ‘J’ to watch violent video games. These even included one played by Norwegian neo-Nazi Anders Breivik before he murdered seventy-seven people, including children, at a summer camp.
His father contends Medway failed to safeguard ‘J’ while he was in their care. He also says they refused to let him practice his music. The son, like his father, is a gifted musician.
Son had learned violent behaviour
During the court process, a psychologist, one Celeste Van Rooyen, reported on Mr Lukjanenko. She recommended Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. This is usually prescribed for addiction, anxiety, psychosis or emotional trauma. It aims to change feelings by the subject taking control of his thoughts and behaviour. It is hard to see what use it could have been for Mr Lukjanenko. No-one would supply it for him, in any case. Eventually, a judge said J should go home.
Mr Lukjanenko told this ministry that when his son came out of care, the effects of the emotional harm inflicted on him by the council became apparent in increasingly violent behaviour.
In 2014 there was an episode of extreme behaviour from ‘J’. Mr Lukjanenko made the mistake of dialing 999 to ask for help from paramedics. Ambulance staff attended with police and naturally, social services again became involved. J was again taken into what the system refers to as ‘care’.
Council told the press
Disturbingly, there were lurid stories in the press of the boy ‘cowering under a piano’. These stories, astonishingly put about by the local authority, made it appear as if the son was hiding from his father. In reality, says Mr Lukjanenko, he was trying to hide from the police and social services.
Mr Lukjanenko then made a second mistake. He complained about Medway Council. Many parents report the system ‘biting back’ when they complain.
The Council promptly commissioned one Melanie Pringle Kelly Gill to provide a psychologist’s report on Mr Lukjanenko. In this ministry’s experience, a case in the family court is never complete without a psychiatric report on at least one parent. There are many psychiatric professionals who do little more than write court reports on parents. It provides a good living.
Melanie Gill and David Keighley
Miss Gill’s website claims she specialises ‘in developmental trauma, attachment science, schema theory, family dynamics, mental health and child and adult forensic assessment’. Her LinkedIn page claims she is a lecturer at Roehampton University, a manager at Sussex NHS Foundation Trust and founder of the Mindful Policy Group.
The latter has child psychologist Penelope Leach at its head. But Melanie Gill’s two most recent sources of remuneration are as a forensic consultant to the courts and as a ‘Specialist Psychologist and Forensic Consultant in Private and Public Law cases’ and ‘Expert Witness’.
Melanie Gill channels her fees through a limited company, Keighley Gill Consulting. And who is the Keighley part? He is David John Keighley, who describes himself as a ‘writer’. Powerbase describes him as ‘a media consultant and right-wing operative’. He was head of press and publicity for ITV breakfast franchise TV-am. He then founded a media monitoring company, Minotaur Media Tracking. His fellow director was Kathy Gyngell, widow of TV executive Bruce.
Link to Conservative Woman website
David Keighley moved on to news-watch.co.uk to file stories about BBC bias against Brexit. He is also a director of Melanie Gill’s ‘Mindful Policy Group’. She, strangely, isn’t.
Melanie Gill is also well-connected in Parliament, though Mr Keighley. She has signed letters urging protection for children from pornography online.
And what of Kathy Gyngell? She heads up the Conservative Woman website. It is relentlessly pro-family and traditionalist. We should thoroughly approve.
But surprise, surprise, it carries a hypocritical article from Melanie Gill praising Dr Leach for a book showing the damage done to children by splitting them from their parents. That is exactly what Medway Council commissioned Melanie Gill to do to Eugene Lukjanenko and his son.
Inherited Holocaust Trauma
Melanie Gill, inventor of ‘Inherited Holocaust Trauma’
So what kind of report did Melanie Gill write on Eugene Lukjanenko? Well, she discovered (because he told her) that his 84-year-old father survived the Jewish ghetto in Vinnytsa in Ukraine during World War 2.
Although conditions were appalling in the ghetto, the Nazis did not separate families as in the concentration camps and Mr Lukjanenko’s father remained with his father and mother.
Out of this, Melanie Gill dreamed up a previously unheard-of condition. She decided Mr Lukjanenko was suffering from ‘inherited holocaust trauma’. This imaginary genetic condition must affect a huge number of Jewish people. Because of it, Melanie Gill proposed, and one Judge Veronica Hammerton agreed, Mr Lukjanenko was unfit to care for his son until he had therapy.
And of course no psychiatrist would provide such a ridiculous course.
In addition, a police report about the Lukjanenko home led the CPS to reject any idea of the father being prosecuted for neglect. However, Judge Hammerton said the same report showed an overwhelming case for removing ‘J’ at once. Welcome to the crazy, secretive world of the Family Courts.
‘J’ was taken into care for ’emotional abuse’. The term is ill defined and subject to a range of variation across England and Wales. If one believes the figures, emotional abuse is two and a half times more rife in Medway than in the rest of Kent.
Medway Council did not honour Care Plan
A care plan allows Mr Lukjanenko to see ‘J’ in a ‘contact centre’ four times a year, although he says Medway failed to honour this commitment. Father and son are forbidden to speak in their native language and when Mr Lukjanenko tried to pass a copy of the Human Rights Act to ‘J’ the social workers objected, saying it was not in ‘J’s’ ‘best interests’ to know his human rights.
Mr Lukjanenko also says:
* Medway refused to deliver Christmas presents to his son,
* They refused to pass on Christmas cards from family and friends,
* They even refused to allow ‘J’ to take a phone call from his grandfather,
* Medway refuse to accept that keeping ‘J’ in care is doing him any harm,
In July 2017 Councillor Andrew Mackness refused to talk to Eugene L about his son. He is Children Portfolio Holder at Medway Council. Mr Lukjanenko wanted to ask him why Medway children services were, as he put it, ‘ruining’ his son and not allowing him to see his father.
Protest lost minister his seat
This protest at Edward Timpson’s home in May, cost the minister his seat and led to a Tory manifesto commitment on reform of the family courts, which is yet to be honoured.
Just before the 2017 general election, Mr Lukjanenko staged a protest on a roof of the home of children’s minister Edward Timpson in Tarporley, Cheshire. He occupied the porch roof for almost three days, 57 hours in all.
According to the local press, in October 2017 Mr Lukjanenko, ‘60, of Rainham in Gillingham, was found guilty after a trial at Chester Magistrates Court of harassing Edward Timpson, the former Tory MP for Crewe and Nantwich, after staging a 57 hour rooftop protest against forced adoption at his home in Utkinton.
‘Lukjanenko was found guilty of one count of pursuing a course of action that amounted to harassment, and one further count of failing to comply with a police order to leave the premises,’ the Chester Chronicle went on. Mr Lukjanenko was given 26 weeks’ custody for the harassment charge. He was sentenced to four weeks for the failure to comply charge. Both sentences were to run concurrently and were suspended for two years.
The protest led to a manifesto commitment from the Tories to reform the family courts. Nevertheless, the Conservative MP lost his Crewe and Nantwich seat by fewer than 100 votes.
In prison for no crime
While he was in Elmley Prison, prison officers managed to arrange a visit from Mr Lukjanenko’s son. He says they were sympathetic and puzzled to find someone in prison who had not committed any crime. The fact that the pianist went on a 62-day hunger strike in protest at not seeing his son strengthened the hand of the prison management in their dealings with Medway.
But it is increasingly clear that Medway are holding J against his will.
At one of the contempt hearings, Mr Lukjanenko had lunchtime discussions with Medway officials. During these, he produced a letter.
The letter was signed by his son, and said he wanted to come home. It emerged Mr Lukjanenko drafted it. He gave it to his son to read and sign in his last meeting at the local authority contact centre. Although these were not family court proceedings, the judge was aghast. ‘Was not the contact supervised? How did that happen?’ Judge Richard Scarratt demanded.
‘Please don’t give up’
Contact centres are intended to be heavily policed by social workers. Parents are not even supposed to tell their children they love them or that they are fighting to get them home. They may certainly not pass pieces of paper to them.
On Mr Lukjanenko’s 60th birthday in August 2017, his son sent him a wallet with a note tucked in with the present. The note was written in Russian. Mr Lukjanenko was pleased to see his son could still write Russian. He claims social workers are trying to deny the boy his language, Jewish religion, family connections and culture.
But he was greatly encouraged by the note. It read: ‘I know things are difficult for you and for me, but please don’t give up.’
Please pray
Please continue to pray form Mr Lukjanenko and his son ‘J’. Pray for the council workers. The Deputy Director of Children and Adults Services, one Ann Domeney, is heavily involved. And Mr Lukjanenko told us in November 2017 that her boss, Director Ian Sutherland ‘called me to say my son “will never come back’ to my care”.’ That does rather show an obstructive attitude.
Pray for local Councillors to call their officials to account. Pray for justice in this case. Furthermore, ‘J’ will be sixteen later this year. It is vindictive for a UK local authority to hold a young man against his will in such a way. Medway could and probably should find themselves on the end of legal action from J for breach of his right to a family life.
Scripture says: Exodus 23:6 Thou shalt not wrest the judgment of thy poor in his cause. Ezekiel 45:9 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Let it suffice you, O princes of Israel: remove violence and spoil, and execute judgment and justice, take away your exactions from my people, saith the Lord GOD. Amos 5:24: But let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream.
We are asking Medway Councillors for comments on this story.
We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Ichthyornis dispar - not a bird missing link at all
Ichthyornis dispar – not a bird missing link at all
The mainstream media is all over Ichthyornis dispar. This is supposed to be a ‘missing link’ between dinosaurs and birds. The name means something like ‘disparate fish-bird’.
Evolutionists like Bhart-Anjan Bhullar of Yale University claim: ‘It shows us what the first bird beak looked like.’ ‘It’s a real mosaic of features, a transitional form.’ That’s what he says. ‘A transitional form’. At last! The elusive missing link!
Evolution Cheerleader
The BBC is top cheerleader for evolution. Moreover, it’s not just David Attenborough. Expressions like ‘adapted’, ‘evolved’ ‘millions of years’ are used all over the network. Anyway, according to the BBC, ‘It has long been known that birds evolved from dinosaurs in what was a slow gradual process, involving feathers, wings and beaks.’ Has it really? Or should we replace the word ‘known’ by ‘thought by evolutionists’?
‘The bones of Ichthyornis were first found in the 1870s by the US palaeontologist Othniel C Marsh’, says Auntie. Apparently, Charles Darwin read about the fossil. He thought it afforded support for the theory of evolution. But he described it as ‘work on “old birds” .’
Researcher Daniel Field, from the University of Bath, said it was an ‘extraordinary new specimen’. He assured us it had ‘similar brain proportions to that of a modern bird’. However, ‘other parts of the skull more closely resemble those of predatory dinosaurs’.
Velociraptor’s jaws nothing like Ichthyornis dispar
Velociraptor’s powerful jaw is nothing like that of Ichthyornis dispar.
‘Right under our noses this whole time was an amazing, transitional bird,’ said Dr Bhart-Anjan Bhullar.
So is it? Not really. For a start, Ichthyornis dispar really looks like a bird. Its teeth are held in a fragile, elongated bill. It could give you a nasty nip. It might even hold something like a fish to stop it getting away.
But it has little in common with a therapod dinosaur like Velociraptor. The latter’s strong head and jaw is clearly designed for ripping flesh, which Ichthy is not. Some birds today do have powerful ripping beaks. That still does not mean they are descended from velociraptor. But, in any case, Ichthy didn’t. As it happens, the BBC claims: ‘The seagull-sized bird had a beak and a brain much like modern birds, but the sharp teeth and powerful jaws of dinosaurs like Velociraptor’. Did it? No. But none of the evolution-supporting mainstream media give you a picture of a velociraptor. It would never do to let the reader see the differences for himself.
Some modern birds have teeth
Even today, the Canada Goose has teeth.
And there is something else none of them will tell you. And that is that some modern birds have teeth.
There are not many, but among them are several species of goose. The Greylag Goose, Canada Goose, even domestic geese all have teeth. Then there is the tooth-billed bowerbird, which does what it says on the tin.
As it happens, the Independent, cited above, denies those species even exist. ‘Toothed birds vanished along with the dinosaurs and many other species after an asteroid impact 66 million years ago.’ Tell that to the Canada Goose. From a distance, if I were you.
And if parts of Ichthy’s head resembled something in a dinosaur, so what? It so happens we share many bodily features with birds. That is evidence of an overall Designer (yes, with a capital ‘D’), not a common ancestor.
Gen 1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
Even the Rational Skeptic website says evolutionists had ‘better let go’ of both Archaeopteryx and Ichthyornis Dispar. The latter, it says, was not a missing link. It ‘was 100 percent bird.’
But don’t expect the BBC or the Indy to let go of Ichthy any time soon.
We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
