UK Christian Constitution

Home UK Christian Constitution Page 11

Ofsted targets ‘fundamentalists’

Amanda Spielman, head of Ofsted
Amanda Spielman, head of Ofsted
Amanda Spielman, head of Ofsted
Amanda Spielman, head of Ofsted

According to the BBC, England’s chief inspector of schools is targetting what she calls ‘fundamentalists’ and ‘religious extremists’.

Amanda Spielman, head of Ofsted, says some community leaders see schools as vehicles to ‘indoctrinate impressionable minds’.

They use schools to narrow children’s horizons and ‘pervert education’, she says. Some schools even promote ‘extremist ideology’.

She is asking head teachers to confront those who foster what she terms ‘extremist behaviour’.

Ofsted on ‘Forms of liberalism’

‘Rather than adopting a passive liberalism that says anything goes, for fear of causing offence, schools leaders should be promoting a muscular liberalism,’ Ms Spielman said.  She was speaking today at a conference held by the Church of England in London.

‘That sort of liberalism holds no truck for ideologies that seek to close minds or narrow opportunity.

‘Occasionally that will mean taking uncomfortable decisions or having tough conversations.

‘It means not assuming that the most conservative voices in a particular faith speak for everyone.’

She added: ‘Ofsted inspectors are increasingly brought into contact with those who want to actively pervert the purpose of education’.

Extremist ideology

‘Under the pretext of religious belief, they use education institutions, legal and illegal, to narrow young people’s horizons, to isolate and segregate, and in the worst cases to indoctrinate impressionable minds with extremist ideology.

‘Freedom of belief in the private sphere is paramount, but in our schools it is our responsibility to tackle those who actively undermine fundamental British values or equalities law.’

She is making the speech to support head teacher Neena Lall, of St Stephen’s state primary in east London. Ms Lall has tried to prevent children under the age of eight from wearing the hijab in class. Generally speaking, Muslim girls, although not all of them, wear the hijab after the age of 10. Ms Lall also tried to stop younger pupils from taking part in Ramadan fasting during school hours.

‘All forms of fundamentalism’

Tahir Alam, alleged "ringleader" of the Trojan Horse Plot of Muslims to take over secular schools, was also the co-author of a <strong><a href="https://www.christianvoice.org.uk/index.php/trojan-horse-plot-strategy-revealed/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">72-page document revealing the strategy</a></strong>. See below
Tahir Alam, alleged “ringleader” of the Trojan Horse Plot of Muslims to take over secular schools, was also the co-author of a 72-page document revealing the strategy. See below…

So far, so anti-Muslim, but naturally the Chief Inspector implied she also has Christian schools in her sights. Ofsted said Ms Spielman was not targeting the Islamic faith, but ‘all forms of fundamentalism’.

A Department for Education official said: ‘Extremism has no place in our society.

That’s why we changed the law and the requirements on schools so that they have to actively promote the ‘fundamental British values’ of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and the mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs.

‘If there are any allegations of schools promoting ideologies or discrimination in the classroom, we will not hesitate to take action.’

What it means for Christians

There are two ways of looking at this story. Maybe it really is all about Islam.  In this view, Ofsted is putting up a smokescreen with its ‘all forms of fundamentalism’ line.

Or perhaps Ofsted really have Christian schools in their sights. This view might make better sense.  There have already been disturbing accounts of Ofsted inspectors marking down Christian schools.

The Independent reported in January 2017: ‘A number of Christian fundamentalist schools have been downgraded by government inspectors following an investigation by The Independent which revealed children at some schools that follow the Accelerated Christian Education (ACE) curriculum are taught that LGBT people are inferior and girls must submit to men.’ There are 26 ACE schools registered in the UK.

According to the Daily Telegraph, ‘Nine out of 10 schools linked to the Christian Education Europe network were deemed inadequate or said to be requiring improvement in their latest visit by the regulator in October 2016, despite most receiving positive feedback previously.

‘Criticisms included failing to balance lessons on the creation with teaching about evolution and not addressing other faiths in class in deep enough detail.’

Christian school forced to close

Ofsted forced Cornerstone School in Epsom to close
Ofsted forced Cornerstone School in Epsom to close

And in November 2015, as a local paper reports, Cornerstone School in Epsom was forced to close. Ofsted reported pupils at the small Christian faith school in Epsom had ‘a limited view of the world.’ They were not ‘open to the views of those who might have different beliefs than those offered by church members’.

In the Guardian’s article, Ofsted reported: ‘Pupils do not have sufficient opportunity to learn about and consider the lives of those who have a different religious faith or no faith.’

Headteacher Grahame Davies said: ‘The mountain of demands made by Ofsted meant that, after over 27 years as headteacher, I felt I was not the person to take the school forward.

‘Our unique setting means that this is much easier said than done, so the governors realised they had little option but to close the school.’

Parents’ responsibility

Teaching about creation has been one other way in which Christian schools have incurred the wrath of Ofsted. So is teaching Biblical morality and not giving room to condom-based sex education.  The Bible shows the importance of sound teaching here, but it cuts both ways:

Prov 22:6 Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.

Going further, parents have the responsibility for their children’s education:

Deut 6:7 And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.

The New Testament reinforces that doctrine:

Eph 6:4 And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

It follows that Muslim parents have the right to bring up their children as they see fit. Nevertheless, they should not do this at public expense. If they are delegating the duty, as is their right, they should pay for it themselves.  Moreover, we should be clear.  They may not teach murder or treason.  However, teaching against the transient fashion of ‘equalities law’ may be a prophetic act, whoever does it.

Indoctrination

Muslims, however, prefer to have their cake and eat it. They put their children into state schools.  When there are enough Muslim children, they make sure the school becomes Islamic. However, the State will certainly inspect schools which have public funding. Moreover, if it finds that a Muslim clique has taken over, Ofsted should take action.  This was what happened in the Trojan Horse scandal in Birmingham.

But firstly, as is clear, even private schools are under the inspection regime. Secondly, Ofsted used the Trojan Horse problem to bring in the absurd ‘British Values’ idea, and try to compel all schools to become ‘liberal’ and ‘tolerant’ notably of perversion.

Amanda Spielman, head of Ofsted, says some community leaders see schools as vehicles to ‘indoctrinate impressionable minds’. But Ofsted itself wants to ‘indoctrinate impressionable minds’ – in all schools. It will do that with its own liberal values.

Ofsted express outrage at schools ‘promoting ideologies’. But every school does that.  Ofsted mean ‘ideologies we do not share.’  We may feel a constitutional Christian State should insist on Christian ideology. But the elite are now overwhelmingly secularist, and they defend their privileged position by all means possible.

Home schoolers

German Social Services took the Wunderlich children because their parents were home-schooling them. Home-schooling is illegal in Germany.
German Social Services took the Wunderlich children because their parents were home-schooling them. Home-schooling is illegal in Germany.

Finally, home schoolers should be on guard.  Ofsted and its Scottish and Northern Irish equivalents will not stop until home schooling is either outlawed or registered. The Biblical idea of parents educating their children is anathema to the elite.

They believe the ‘purpose of education’ is to make children uncritical servants of the state.

Radical Christians or New Agers often head such households. Either way, the elite see them as places of insurrection against the system.

Do not think a clamp-down cannot happen. Home schooling is illegal in Germany.  Children will be taken away from home-schooling parents, as we reported here.

In 2009, an MP proposed outlawing home schooling in this jurisdiction.  The move led to a huge petition, in which Christian Voice was involved.   Our report on that is here.  And local authorities have been known to take children into care because they are being home-schooled.  You can find our report on such a travesty of justice in Medway here.

Be on high alert.

We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Real Time Analytics


Clicky

Army puts diversity above effectiveness

General Sir Nicholas Carter is head of the British Army
General Sir Nicholas Carter is head of the British Army
General Sir Nicholas Carter is head of the British Army
General Sir Nicholas Carter is head of the British Army

The MOD have enlisted a supposed Russian threat in their bid for more money. But are the armed forces now more keen on ‘diversity’ than effectiveness? What are they for in today’s world?  And could they make cuts in their inflated levels of top brass?

Nick Carter: Russia Threat

First out of blocks was General Sir Nicholas Carter. The Chief of the General Staff was warning at the end of January that British forces must ‘keep up’ to counter an alleged Russia threat. General Carter said Moscow is building an increasingly aggressive and expeditionary force. It already boasts capabilities that outmatch UK forces, he said. Furthermore, last year Russia undertook simulated attacks across Northern Europe.

According to the Independent, the month before, the head of the Armed Forces spoke.  Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart Peach claimed Russia poses a threat to Britain’s internet access and trade.

Russia’s “modernised” navy would be cutting underwater transcontinental cables. The UK had to bolster its naval forces to counter the threat, he went on.

Gavin Williamson: They’ll kill thousands

Nick Carter had barely stepped from his podium when Rt Hon Gavin Williamson MP chimed in. The Daily Telegraph interviewed the Defence Secretary as its main front-page story on Friday last week. Russia was spying on Britain’s critical national infrastructure, claimed the Secretary of State.

Rt Hon Gavin Williamson MP, HM Secretary of State for Defence (R)
Rt Hon Gavin Williamson MP, HM Secretary of State for Defence (R)

‘The plan for the Russians won’t be for landing craft to appear in the South Bay in Scarborough, and off Brighton Beach,’ he said.

‘What they [Russia] are looking at doing is they are going to be thinking “How can we just cause so much pain to Britain?” Damage its economy, rip its infrastructure apart, actually cause thousands and thousands and thousands of deaths, but actually have an element of creating total chaos within the country.’

Gavin Williamson asserted that Moscow had been researching the UK’s critical infrastructure and how it connected to Continental power supplies with a view to creating ‘panic’ and ‘chaos.’

‘Scaremongering’

But energy experts said Mr Williamson’s claims were scaremongering. As the Guardian put it, the lights were ‘unlikely to go out even if the electricity interconnectors, which supply about 5% of UK power, were somehow cut off.’

“It does sound a bit like scaremongering really. If you take out one interconnector it’s clear the UK can survive. We saw that last year with the one to France,” said Jonathan Marshall, energy analyst at the ECIU thinktank, referring to a major power cable to France running at half capacity after it was damaged by a storm.

John Feddersen, the chief executive of Aurora Energy Research, agreed. “Electricity is not a major problem, we’ve got a decent amount of capacity. No house lights are going to go out,” he said.

The Daily Express ventured Mr Williamson’s outburst was timed to deflect attention from an embarrassing story about him.

Non-existent Russian Threat

With virtually the whole of the Ministry of Defence talking up some kind of a threat from Russia, it is good to remind ourselves there is no actual threat to British interests from Russia at all. Of course the Russians will conduct scary exercises on their borders. NATO has enough forces spread across eastern Europe to convince the Russians they are under an imminent threat.

Britain currently has 800 infantry and 150 armoured personnel wasting their time and our money in the Baltics. The Americans sent 87 tanks to Poland this time last year. We reported on NATO’s sabre-rattling at the time. It all creates jobs in the armaments manufacturers, for sure. But NATO and EU expansionism worries the Russians, who feel they have to stress their capability to respond.

Psalm 120:7 I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.

In reality, Russia can hardly govern its own vast territory. BAE Systems might not like it, but the Cold War is over. The Russians are neither our ‘enemies’ nor ‘our adversaries’. They are our allies in the real fight against militant Islam. The military and associated politicians need to grow up and smarten up.

Equality & Diversity

General Sir James Everard is Patron of the Army LGBT Forum
General Sir James Everard is Patron of the Army LGBT Forum

However, if the armed forces really are serious about their operational ability, why do they divert their energies into something as non-productive as equality and diversity?

The British Army has a full general (one of only three) in charge of equality and diversity. General Sir James Rupert Everard, KCB, CBE (born 23 September 1962) serves as NATO’s Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe. But General Everard is also, as Wikipedia puts it, a ‘strong advocate of diversity’. General Everard has served as Patron of the Army LGBT Forum since 2010 when he was a Lt-General. He himself is not that way inclined, being married with three children.

Furthermore, Christian Voice has learned the General has a whole department at Home Command headquarters at Andover working on the subject. The unit must be commanded by a Major-General or Lt-General reporting directly to Gen Everard. It could even be Lt Gen Patrick Sanders, who is ‘LGBT Champion for the Army’. (See ‘Stonewall’ below.)  Equality and Diversity is now the main focus of the British Army.

Diversity Statistics

But what good is all the emphasis on women, BME personnel and gays doing?

According to the UK Armed Forces Biannual Diversity Statistics of 1st October 2017, ‘18.8 per cent of service personnel declared a sexual orientation. There were 23.3 per cent of Officers and 17.8 per cent of Other Ranks declaring a sexual orientation.’

Now then, how many owned up to being homosexual? It might be more fashionable in today’s armed forces to be homosexual, but in any event, the Biannual Diversity Statistics failed actually to give a heterosexual / bisexual / homosexual / transsexual / queer / intersex etc breakdown. So for all the money spent on diversity no-one knows. And who cares whether female representation in UK regular forces is stable at 10.3%?

The Bible, of course, shows God expects men to do the fighting, but it also stresses the virtue of peace.

Isaiah 9:7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.

Black and Asian recruits

Soldiers from 5th Battalion The Rifles, Headquarters take part in a Military March and Shoot.
Soldiers from 5th Battalion The Rifles, Headquarters take part in a Military March and Shoot.

Turning to black and minority-ethnic personnel, here are figures from the same report. ‘BAME personnel accounted for 10.5 per cent of intake into the UK Regular Forces in the 12 months to 30 September 2017.’ But, according to the statistics for England and Wales alone, black people and Asians made up 10.8% of the population at the last count. Other ‘non-whites’ were 3.2%.

Talking about religion, Christians made up 71.9% of the total armed forces. ‘No religion’ was 25.5%. According to UK statistics, Hindus are outnumbered four-to-one by Muslims in the UK population. Despite that, Hindus provide 0.8% of the armed forces, double the Muslim 0.4%.

Given the reluctance of Muslims to join the armed forces, the Army, Navy and Air Force are not doing that bad. It could indeed be argued that recruitment should be colour-blind, and there is no need for a diversity unit at all.

Stonewall Equality Index

With General Everard in charge of appeasing the LGBT lobby, it comes as no surprise that the Army has made the ‘Stonewall 100 list’.  It even boasts about it on its website.

‘The British Army is delighted to be counted once again, as one of the top 100 employers in Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index 2018. This listing is prestigious (sic) as it is judged against more than 430 organisations and companies. It is also testament to the increasingly inclusive environment within the Army’, it simpers.

“We are delighted to be included in Stonewall’s listing of Top 100 employers,” says Lt Gen Patrick Sanders, Commander Field Army and LGBT Champion for the Army. “It recognises our commitment to diversity and the importance we place on allowing soldiers to be themselves.

Darren Towers, Executive Director, Stonewall said: ‘The British Army and all those who have made this year’s Top 100 Employers list have done a fantastic job. Taking part in our Index shows real commitment to understanding and advancing LGBT equality. This year, for the first time, the Index looked at what employers were doing for trans equality in the workplace. This work is crucial.’

The previous 'Be the Best' adverts emphasised ruggedness and learning a skill
The previous ‘Be the Best’ adverts emphasised ruggedness and learning a skill

British Army Bedtime stories

On top of this, the Army gained ridicule in January for its latest recruiting campaign. Its previous ‘Be the Best’ adverts, (Here’s one on YouTube), emphasised ruggedness and action. It showed the benefits of joining the army. That was all the qualifications in jobs you could train for. There was only a gentle nod towards black recruits.

But the latest (shown here) is more emotional (’emo’) showing men under strain. Their mates are giving them coffee. Moreover, around half the section are black, making the video more aspirational than true. It has a ‘This is Belonging’ strap-line. One fully expects the Sergeant to read you a bedtime story if you are afraid of the dark.

An image from the new British Army recruitment adverts. Fewer than half a percent of army personnel are actually Muslim.
An image from the new British Army recruitment adverts. Fewer than half a percent of army personnel are actually Muslim.

Even the Philistines in the Bible could do better than that:

1Sam 4:9  Be strong, and quit yourselves like men, O ye Philistines, that ye be not servants unto the Hebrews, as they have been to you: quit yourselves like men, and fight.

Another ad features a cartoon baby and mummy, a Muslim bowing down on his prayer mat, and apparently, someone asking whether they can be ‘gay’ in the army. According to this video, which shows some of the ads, on Channel 5 news, the British Army spent £1.6 million on the campaign.

Threats now more sinister

Major General Tim Cross thought it could reach out to ‘various aspects of the community’. But should marketing probe an unrepresented market, or play to the product’s market strengths?  Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan is in the latter camp. He said the ad campaign was “neglecting the main group of people who are interested in joining” and will not solve the “recruiting crisis” facing the armed forces.

But if there is a recruiting crisis, the UK’s trend to full employment will not help. And threats are now more sinister, more home-grown, or arising from Islamist terror groups. The threat from expansionist nations (the EU excepted) is vanishing. Even North Korea is more concerned with Kim Jong-Un’s survival than with over-running its southern neighbour.

Is there a case for a British Army of the present strength at all? According to this excellent resource, it has no fewer than fourteen Lieutenant-Generals commanding just three or four corps, 112,00 personnel, in all. These split into Field Army and Home Command. There need to be soldiers doing paperwork, working on logistics, training schedules, procurement and so on.  But fourteen Lieutenant-Generals?

How many Brigadiers?

The British Army Structure
The British Army Structure

A Division Contains 3 Brigades and numbers 10,000. The Army would have perhaps twelve Divisions spread out over the Field Army and Home Command. So why do we need thirty-nine Major-Generals to command them?

A Brigade Contains 3-5 Battalions and has 5,000 personnel. In terms of numbers, the British Army has perhaps twenty-four brigades. Now, guess who commands a brigade? Yes, it’s a Brigadier. Each of those twelve Major-Generals would have two Brigadiers under him. Each Brigadier would command a brigade. We understand that Brigadier is a rank, not a job description, but, seriously, why do we need one hundred and thirty-six of them?

Conclusion

We could go on. From scare-stories, to wasteful diversity programmes, to mis-directed advertising, the British Army has a quite different challenge from the simplistic financial one its leaders put forward. And apart from the ridiculous diversity unit, and the top brass overstaffing, we have not even touched upon the myriad ways in which the army wastes tax-payers’ money – in procurement for example. Maybe the lack of sufficient recruitment reflects society’s confusion about what the British Army is there for at all.

We’ll really appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Real Time Analytics


Clicky

Chief Prosecutor: ‘No rape injustice’

Chief Prosecutor for England & Wales Alsion Saunders
Chief Prosecutor for England & Wales Alsion Saunders
Chief Prosecutor for England &amp; Wales Alison Saunders
Chief Prosecutor for England & Wales Alison Saunders

According to reports, Chief Prosecutor for England and Wales Alison Saunders has said she does not think anyone is in jail after being wrongly convicted because of failures to disclose crucial evidence.

Her remarks follow a string of cases which have collapsed after police and prosecutors failed to disclose important evidence to the defence team exonerating the defendants.

God loves to see earthly justice

The Bible says Almighty God appointed human justice, so this is a serious matter (KJV):

Psalm 33:5 He loveth righteousness and judgment: the earth is full of the goodness of the LORD.

Further scriptures show how seriously God takes the administration of justice in a realm:

Exod 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Prov 21:3 To do justice and judgment is more acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice.

The prophet Isaiah leaves us in no doubt about the requirements of earthly justice:

Isa 56:1 Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and do justice: for my salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be revealed.

And Isaiah even says the Messiah, Jesus Christ himself, demands and brings justice:

Isa 9:7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.

‘Do that which is good’

In the New Testament we read that rulers and judges are ministers of God to execute his judgement.

Romans 13:3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Towards the end of last year two rape cases collapsed because the prosecution failed to disclose crucial evidence.  This was mainly from text messages.  Crucially, it exonerated the defendant.  We reported on these cases in our January newsletter. (We send a copy free to paid-up members of Christian Voice. Click here to join) Each time, the case began with a false accusation of rape.

False accusations

In August last year, a woman was jailed for inventing rape claims to get attention from her lesbian lover. The judge sent Jemma Beale down for ten years. We reported on an earlier case where a woman received 18 months. Louise Johnson accused Andrew Tutty of rape, attempted rape, assault and harassment after he ended their brief affair.

It is not just women who make false accusations. Disturbed young men can make homosexual allegations. One of the more shocking was that of David Bryant, a retired fireman who spent four years in jail after a false allegation. Mr Bryant was convicted on his accuser’s word alone. As we report here, he was released in 2016 only after new evidence came to light and a sustained campaign by his wife Lynn.

We reported on Mr Bryant’s ordeal in the Christian Voice newsletter in 2016.  You will find our report online here.

Believe the accuser

False accusations of rape are easy to make and have been around from the earliest days. Here is what Potiphar’s wife did after she failed to seduce Joseph, grabbing hold of his cloak and seeing him run from the room:

Gen 39:14 That she called unto the men of her house, and spake unto them, saying, See, he hath brought in an Hebrew unto us to mock us; he came in unto me to lie with me, and I cried with a loud voice: 15 And it came to pass, when he heard that I lifted up my voice and cried, that he left his garment with me, and fled, and got him out.

Potiphar believed his wife on her word alone and sent Joseph to prison. This righteous man did well there, but that’s another story.

Given the scope for false allegations, police and prosecutors should be all the more careful. Nevertheless, they have adopted a ‘believe the accuser’ mindset.

The situation is worse in England, Wales and Northern Ireland than Scotland.  South of the Border, prosecutors need no corroborating evidence before a case may be brought.  Accordingly, they can – and do – proceed on the basis of ‘her word against his’.

Chief Prosecutor ‘complacent’

The Chief Prosecutor told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: ‘The problem we have found recently is around the ever-increasing use of social media, all the digital material we obtain.’

Asked if it was possible there were people in prison today because of disclosure failures, Ms Saunders astonishingly replied: ‘I don’t think so because what these cases show is that when we take a case through to trial there are various safeguards in place, not least of which the defence indicating what their defence is going to be.’

Many observers would say that is not just complacent but plain wrong. The most important safeguard is not the defence telling the prosecution what their defence will be. It is the police and prosecution disclosing all the evidence!

Do not convict the innocent

The word of God sets forth a basic principle of justice – not to convict the innocent:

Exod 23:7 Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked.

The Bible says this about perjury:

Deut 19:18 And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; 19 Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.

Evidence disclosure failings

Diligent inquisition requires all the disclosure of all the evidence. Moreover, the BBC reports today on all cases dropped over evidence disclosure failings. The number of prosecutions in England and Wales that collapsed because of a failure by police or prosecutors to disclose evidence increased by 70% in the last two years.

Last year, prosecutors dropped charges against 916 people over a failure to disclose evidence. The dropped charges against 537 in 2014-15.

Reporters obtained the figures under the Freedom of Information Act. They reveal the total number of people whose trials have ended or the charges against them dropped. In every case this was because of a failure to disclose evidence:

2013-14: 583
2014-15: 537
2015-16: 732
2016-17: 916

Over those four years, the number of completed prosecutions fell by almost 150,000 cases – from more than 736,000 in 2013-14 to just over 588,000 in 2016-17.

‘Systemic’ problems

Contrary to the complacent response of Alison Saunders, the Crown Prosecution Service admitted the justice system had ‘systemic’ problems. A CPS spokesperson defended the number of dropped cases due to evidence disclosure failures. He said they represented just 0.15% of the total number of prosecutions. However, he went on:

‘That is still too many … and we are clear that there are systemic disclosure issues across the criminal justice system which will require a collective effort in order to bring about improvement.

‘Getting this right is a priority, and along with the police and other criminal justice partners we are working to improve how we fulfil these vital disclosure obligations.’

Angela Rafferty QC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, blamed a ‘lack of investment, training and attention to the criminal justice system’.

She said barristers face ‘A daily struggle in respect of disclosure, delays and all the other disastrous consequences of a system that is openly described by MPs as at breaking point’.  ‘The reasons for it must be properly explored and dealt with,’ she went on.

MP concerned

Anna Soubry is a long-serving Conservative MP and a barrister. @Anna_Soubry tweeted: ‘Appalled at the ill informed comments of #DPP Alison Saunders. There hv been longstanding problems w disclosure’ Anna Soubry said she feared Mrs Saunders was ‘part of the problem’.

Continue to pray for the administration of justice in England and Wales. In our January newsletter we stressed the need to bring back the need for corroborating evidence in England and Wales and Northern Ireland. In addition, our Scottish readers must defend it in Scotland. Scotland has its own legal system. A recent attempt to abolish the need for corroborating evidence north of the Border failed. We reported on that in our January newsletter as well. We have already sent it to members. If you are not a member and did not receive it, click below to support and join us:

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

David Bryant: Injustice In Buggery Case

David Bryant with his wife Lynn.
David Bryant with his wife Lynn.
David Bryant with his wife Lynn.
David Bryant with his wife Lynn.

(Article Published in Christian Voice newsletter Summer Recess 2016)

A former fireman convicted of a sex attack and held in jail for four years had his conviction quashed in July 2016 in the Court of Appeal.

David Bryant, now 66, of Grove Road East, Christchurch, Dorset, was accused of committing an offence against a man named in court as Danny Day, who was a 14-year-old boy in the 1970s.

Mr Bryant was found guilty of buggery by a majority verdict of a jury in December 2013. He was jailed for six years in January 2014, but appeal judges later increased the sentence to eight-and-a-half years ruling that the original term imposed at Bournemouth Crown Court was ‘unduly lenient’.

MAJORITY VERDICT

Only a courageous and relentless campaign by his wife, who continued to believe in him, led to the evidence of Mr Day being called into question. The latter’s greed in demanding compensation on false pretences also saw his credibility evaporate.

Mr Bryant’s conviction was overturned as ‘unsafe’ by Sir Brian Leveson, Mr Justice Singh and Mr Justice Holgate in the light of the new evidence.

Mr Day alleged David Bryant carried out the attack with another man who was working as a fireman in Christchurch after they had invited the schoolboy to their fire station to play darts with them.
At a previous Court of Appeal hearing a judge said the alleged victim did not report the alleged incident until 2012 ‘after being motivated to come forward in the aftermath of the Jimmy Savile affair’.

CORROBORATING EVIDENCE NOT NEEDED

The need for corroborating evidence in sexual cases was abolished by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 in order to secure more convictions in rape cases.

Any case of alleged rape or sexual assault may now be determined simply on the word of the accuser against that of the alleged perpetrator. It all comes down to which of the two is more plausible. In some cases, particularly where celebrities are involved, police name the alleged rapist hoping other accusers will come forward to bolster the case.

A senior police source said in connection with the disgraced ‘Operation Midland’: ‘You don’t have forensics, you don’t have cell site evidence in these kinds of inquires. What you are looking for is other witnesses who are giving similar accounts.’

In Operation Midland the police believed a serial liar known as ‘Nick’ and both ex-MP Harvey Proctor and Lord Bramall, former Chief of the General Staff, endured months of suspicion. The singer Sir Cliff Richard also fell foul of supposed ’historic’ accusations with no merit.

But barrister Matthew Scott, writing on the David Bryant case at http://barristerblogger.com, says juries may not reach a proper verdict in a case where no evidence is offered other than the testimony of an accuser.

DAVID BRYANT CASE: ONLY ACCUSER’S WORD

Mr Scott says it is a ‘fallacy … that a jury of ordinary men and women, or for that matter a bench of magistrates or a single professional judge, can be relied upon, without extraneous evidence, to discern beyond reasonable doubt when someone is telling the truth.

‘Unfortunately, as we have learnt time and time again, neither jury nor professional judge can do anything of the sort. Liars sometimes look shifty and nervously play with their hair; but so do people telling the truth, especially when defending themselves in the witness box under extreme pressure. At other times liars are utterly believable.’

In the case of David Bryant, there was no evidence save the word of Mr Day. The jury were unable to ‘spot the liar’, exactly as Mr Scott contends. He was believed. An innocent man spent over two years behind bars.

NOT BOXING CHAMPION

Mr Day waived his right to anonymity in a series of newspaper interviews after the conviction. But he was finally exposed as a liar after detective work by Mrs Bryant and a team of lawyers and private investigators, who worked on the case ‘pro bono’.

After David Bryant’s conviction, Mr Day launched civil proceedings against Mr Bryant and Dorset County Council, which ran the fire service.

In those proceedings he claimed aggravated damages because he said the assault had ruined his chances of appearing at the Olympics in 1984.

Mr Day claimed to be a boxing champion with a record better than Muhammad Ali. He said he had given up his place on the British boxing team at the Los Angeles Olympics in 1984 because of the trauma of the sexual assault.

PSYCHIATRIST REPORT

Mr Scott says: ‘Mr Day had made a mistake. His insatiable greed led to his downfall. Unlike his allegation of rape, where it was just his word against Mr Bryant’s, his claim of having been an Olympic standard boxer was demonstrably untrue. There was no evidence that he had ever so much as stepped foot in a boxing ring.

‘Then he relied on the report of a psychiatrist to prove the extent of his suffering. But this led to his medical records – inexplicably perhaps overlooked or ignored by the police in the original investigation – being examined. It turned out that, to use the language of Mr Justice Singh: “over a period from 2000 to 2010 the complainant in this case had to seek medical attention from his GP in relation to what can only be described as his being a chronic liar”.

‘When the case eventually made its way back to the Court of Appeal even the Prosecution conceded that the conviction could not possibly stand and Mr Bryant was finally set free.’

BIBLICAL STANDARDS OF EVIDENCE

Under a Godly system, a miscarriage of justice such as has happened to David Bryant could not occur. The scriptures show some basic principles:

Firstly, no-one shall be convicted on the evidence of only one witness. Two or three witnesses are required to establish a conviction. God’s eternal standard is especially important in capital offences, but it applies to all.

READ: Exod 23:7; Numb 35:30; Deut 17:06; Matt 18:16; John 8:17-18; 2 Cor 13:1; 1 Tim 5:19; Heb 10:28.

Secondly, perjury is punishable by the same punishment as would have been inflicted upon the innocent man were he to have been found guilty. The witnesses bear the primary responsibility of conviction.

READ: Deut 17:07, 19:15-20, 1Kgs 21:13; Est 7:10.

Corroborating evidence, forensics, CCTV, for example, can plausibly stand as a ‘witness’. But the testimony of a single individual will not meet the standard. It should not even meet the lower standard of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ adopted by our courts.

INNOCENT SHOULD NEVER BE CONVICTED

It was a solid Rabinnic principle that the innocent should never be convicted even if that meant some of the guilty also went free. The English jurist William Blackstone expressed the ratio like this: ‘All presumptive evidence of felony should be admitted cautiously; for the law holds it better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent party suffer’.

Matthew Scott writes: ‘What I cannot accept is that criminal courts should be asked to decide cases from decades ago which depend on the word of one complainant against one defendant.

Distressing though it may be for individuals who were sexually abused when they were children not to be believed, the danger that justice will not be done in such cases is simply too great.

‘In 2003 the then Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf, quashed a conviction largely on the grounds that there was no rational way of deciding who was telling the truth in a case which turned on which of two people was right about an incident that allegedly occurred about 30 years earlier:

‘“At the heart of our criminal justice system is the principle that while it is important that justice is done to the prosecution and justice is done to the victim, in the final analysis the fact remains that it is even more important that an injustice is not done to a defendant. It is central to the way we administer justice in this country that although it may mean that some guilty people go unpunished, it is more important that the innocent are not wrongly convicted.”’

PRINCIPLE ‘IGNORED’ BY THE COURTS

But Mr Scott says even this principle is being ignored by the Courts. The matter is left to juries, and for the court of appeal to put right any wrongs. But juries should not be expected to convict on one party’s word against another, and the court of appeal cannot be relied upon.

READ: Psalm 89:15; Prov 16:12, 25:5, 29:2,14; Isa 16:5.

PRAY: Thank God for the eventual acquittal of David Bryant and praise God for his wife who stood by him. But cry to God in anguish that such injustices are not rare in our land and are not easily put right.

News round-up including: CBB’s Ann Widdecombe slammed for gay marriage views

1
Anne Widdecombe - 8/1/2018
Anne Widdecombe – 8/1/2018

12/1/2018

Termination of Pregnancy provision for women from Northern Ireland

Billie Jean King joins calls for Margaret Court Arena to be renamed after LGBT comments

Act now on compulsory “relationship” education and compulsory sex education

Safeguarding free speech, the LGBT censor-in-chief

Afghan interpreters who risked lives for British Army shut out of universities in Scotland

Labour Party row over transgender women on all-women shortlists for Parliament

Transformation Street: meet the doctor who specialises in gender reassignment surgery

11/1/2018

Child referred to social services every 49 seconds amid rising reports of domestic violence

Teen died at boozy party whilst pals drew on his face and whipped him after he downed bottle of vodka

Cruel videos show self-styled ‘Tramp Buster’ bullying and taunting vulnerable people on the streets

Definition of marriage has now ‘evolved’ to include same-sex couples, EU court says

Britain’s first transgender prom queen, 16, speaks on the vile abuse from internet trolls

10/1/2018

It’s OK to cry, have feelings and pray says army to new recruits, but British Colonel of troops in Afghanistan slams £1.6m diversity drive

Anti-Feminist MP Philip Davies Defends Women In BBC Pay Row

Grammar school bans teachers calling pupils ‘girls’ to not offend transgender children

Parenting duties are setting women on the back foot at work

9/1/2018

Ban on smacking children in Wales will move a step closer

Christians urged to take part in smacking consultation

Gay couple planning cruise ship wedding devastated after same-sex marriages cancelled in Bermuda

Police officer suffers fractured eye socket in unprovoked attack while helping collapsed pensioner

Gender confusion in the NHS

Cambridge woman, 96, ‘denied peaceful death’ at Addenbrooke’s Hospital

8/1/2018

Terrorists plotted Christmas bomb after meeting Islamic State commander on Facebook

CBB’s Ann Widdecombe slammed for ‘homophobic’ gay marriage views

Over 24,000 attempts to access porn sites from parliamentary computers since election

Assaults on Scotland’s firefighters, police and ambulance service reach three-year high

Good Samaritan has EAR ripped off by two thugs who ran him over after he stopped them bullying girls

Kids risk being hooked on betting ‘after being swamped with adverts during TV football games’

One in three stalking victims are MEN – and they’re likely to be stalked by other men as by women

7/1/2018

With homelessness rising young men are increasingly selling their bodies to survive

Shop worker on life support after being “violently attacked” after refusing to serve three teenagers

Universities could face legal action if they allow students to restrict free speech by banning speakers whose views they dislike

6/1/2018

Boys feel body image pain as much as girls

Tim Farron: sodomy is sinful

Former Lib Dem leader Tim Farron
Former Lib Dem leader Tim Farron
Former Lib Dem leader Tim Farron

Tim Farron has said he regrets saying he did not believe homosexual sex was a sin during last year’s general election.

During the six-week long campaign, he was asked repeatedly about his religious beliefs and, specifically, about whether he believed gay sex was a sin.

After initially appearing not to answer the question directly, he said he did not want people getting the ‘wrong impression’ about his views, telling the BBC ‘I don’t believe that gay sex is a sin’.

Foolish and wrong

But yesterday, the ex-Lib Dem leader told Premier Christian Radio he had been ‘foolish and wrong’ and had spoken partly to try and get the issue of his faith ‘off the table’.

The committed Christian said the focus on his beliefs stopped him getting his message across during the campaign.

‘It was a little bit like having your main advertising hoarding permanently damaged and vandalised,’ he said.

Mr Farron stepped down as leader of the Lib Dems after last year’s election. He is now his party’s environment spokesman.

But in an interview yesterday with Premier Christian Radio, he said he now regretted not being honest with himself at the time. Furthermore, he admitted his answers had been motivated, partly, by political expediency.

Tim Farron under pressure

Asked whether he had felt under pressure to deal with the issue while touring the country, he replied: ‘The bottom line is, of course, I did.’

‘There are things – including that – that I said that I regret. There was a sense I felt I had to get this off my table: here’s a general election, a great opportunity for the Liberal Democrats… and all they wanted to do was talk about my Christian beliefs and what it meant.’

‘I would say foolishly and wrongly, [I] attempted to push it away by giving an answer that, frankly, was not right.’

Part of the difficulty he said he found himself wrestling with was the different understanding of what sin constitutes for Christians and non-Christians.

‘In the end, if you are a Christian you have a very clear idea of what sin is. It is us falling short of the glory of God, and that is something all of us equally share.

‘So to be asked that question is essentially to persecute one group of human beings because sin is something, Jesus excepted, we are all guilty of. But if you are not a Christian, what does sin mean? It is to be accused of something, to be condemnatory, and so we are talking different languages.’

Society tolerant – apart from …

Reflecting on his experience, he said he did not believe there was ‘a wicked agenda’ to marginalise or ridicule Christians.  Nevertheless, there was a risk of society becoming ‘tolerant of everything apart from the things we don’t like’.

He added: ‘There are some who just can’t comprehend that somebody can have really strong convictions and be a Bible-believing Christian on the one hand and at the same time really passionately believing in people’s rights to make their own choices, which essentially is what liberalism is.’

Our only point of difference with Mr Farron is over his belief that his faith should not colour his political views. That is a form of pietism.  It stands in contrast to a theonomic view that God makes laws, not man. For example, Jacob Rees-Mogg holds, with Tim Farron, a scriptural view on the sinfulness of sodomy. But Mr Rees-Mogg voted against gay marriage. Mr Farron voted for it.

More Credit to Tim Farron than Vince Cable

Nevertheless, we give Tim Farron great credit. He did wrong, he has admitted it. And full credit also to Premier Christian Radio for giving him a platform. Ours is not an army which shoots its wounded. His humility and repentance should encourage us all to stand full-square on the rock of faith, trust the word of God and proclaim the truth.

In addition, we know where Tim Farron stands.  He has made himself perfectly clear. The one who comes out with no credit at all is Vince Cable, current leader of the LibDems.

@vincecable tweeted: ‘I strongly disagree with @timfarron’s personal views expressed today. @libdems have a long & proud record of fighting for #LGBT+ rights: campaigning to repeal section 28, equalising age of consent and legislating for equal marriage. I will continue to champion rights and dignity.’

Is Mr Cable stupid or just being deliberately obtuse? Tim Farron voted for all those things. He may well have been wrong to do so, but he did.

‘Dangerous’ and ‘offensive’

Back in November 2017, Mr Farron gave a speech to the Theos think tank. He said devout Christians are seen as ‘dangerous’ and ‘offensive’ in modern Britain.

Tim Farron said the idea that there was a ‘unifying set of British values’ was a ‘myth’.

The MP for Westmorland and Lonsdale said: ‘If you actively hold a faith that is more than an expression of cultural identity you are deemed to be far worse than eccentric.

‘You are dangerous. You are offensive,’ he said.

‘Being homosexual’ not a sin

We want to be very clear that ‘being homosexual’; in the sense of suffering from same-sex attraction, is not a sin. It is pathological and may keep someone from full communion with the Almighty, but ‘being’ that way inclined is not a sin. It is doing homosexual acts which is sinful and dwelling on them ‘in the heart’.  There is such a fine line between temptation and sin, but temptation as such is not sin.  The Lord Jesus experienced temptation, but never sinned:

Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.

Many of those who suffer same-sex attraction have been abused and then identify with the aggressor. A boy molested in a children’s home, for example, can then grow up thinking he is homosexual and experience those same desires.  He needs the forgiveness of Christ, as we all do, but he also needs healing and probably deliverance.  That being said, the word of God says plainly:

Lev 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. 23 Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.

Lev 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

An abomination

Moreover, we read in the words above that homosexual activity is an abomination. Verse 22 is the only time that word is used in Leviticus 18 and verse 13 the only time in Lev 20. The Hebrew word is ‘To’ebah.’  It means morally disgusting.

(By the way, the word for shellfish and other unclean foods, also unfortunately translated ‘abomination’ all through Leviticus chapter 11 in the King James Bible, is the Hebrew word sheqets.’ Sheqets just means ‘dirty’. Not that homosexual acts aren’t dirty as well as being an abomination. But the Bible doesn’t say that. We digress. But we see the difference.)

In response to those homosexuals who snarl, ‘So I’m an abomination, am I?’  we need to say having same-sex desires itself is not an ‘abomination’.  Nor is any individual homosexual ‘an abomination’. That is, not until their doing becomes their being. There comes a point where your day-to-day sinful activity defines you. And we have to say that promoting such activity to school children is an abominable thing to do as well.

Moreover, I strongly believe that such depravity in mind or body provides an open invitation to the demonic.

God’s plan for humanity

Many people think Leviticus, or even the story of Sodom in Genesis 19, is the first time God speaks about human sexuality. But it isn’t. The Creator’s plan is for humanity to be formed around the societal institution of heterosexual love and marriage is revealed in the first two chapters of the first book of the Bible. In Genesis we read:

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Gen 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.  24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

The Lord Jesus brought these two scriptures together in his answer to the Pharisees:

Mark 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.
7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife;
8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.

And of course, being one flesh, in that full physical, emotional and spiritual sense, is something a pair of gays, or two lesbians, can never do. They lack the complementary physical, emotional and spiritual equipment.

Forgiveness, deliverance and change

We need to bring in some good news at this point.  Yes, we know there are many routes into homosexuality, which we might define as an inability as an adult to relate emotionally and sexually to a person of the opposite sex.

Homosexual activity is sinful.  Nevertheless, it is not an unforgiveable sin.  Jesus Christ went to the cross so that all sinners might be forgiven.  Furthermnore, the indwelling Holy Spirit, there for every believer, can heal and deliver.

So however someone became gay, they do not have to stay gay.  There is a way out.  Christ’s shed blood wipes away the stain of sin and releases believers from the power of sin.

It is do-able. Many men and women have walked away from homosexuality after realising that it was never God’s plan for their lives.

Why are the godless bothered?

Why is anyone who is not a Christian bothered about whether Christians believe homosexual activity is sinful in the eyes of God?  To put it another way, why are we ‘dangerous and offensive, as Tim Farron suggests?

I suggest it may be because:

1 They are deeply intolerant of any view but their own,
2 They are totalitarian, wanting to impose their views on others,
3 Maybe they are worried God might exist and be right,
4 They know deep down what they (or homosexuals) are doing is wrong,
5 We challenge and disturb their cosy world,
6 The thought there is one higher than them to whom they are responsible annoys and terrifies them,
7 Because from sodomy being a sin to sodomy being a crime is just one theonomic step away.

Nevertheless, no atheist should be at all concerned that I and however many others think buggery and gross indecency should be re-criminalised and recent laws repealed in this respect. We are a long way from the corridors of power.

The traffic is all in the opposite direction. Children are being taught that sodomy is just great and the Government even want to increase the propaganda level. The Government want people to be able to change their God-given gender at will.

Rubbish chute of history

I, and our wonderful Christian Voice members, are just a voice crying in the wilderness, calling for national repentance, urging Christian to pray, and pointing out that every previous society which has passed this way has gone down the rubbish chute of history.

Moreover, every previous civilisation which allowed its family base to crumble and institutionalised sodomy has been conquered by a stronger, self-confident, monogamous culture.

Now, where would we look for one of those on our doorstep today?

Click on the links below to share this story as widely as you can:

News round-up including: Woman asks for female nurse but gets transsexual male

Trans Nurse Used For Female Task 31/12/2017
Trans Nurse Used For Female Task 31/12/2017

5/1/2018

Five UK online casinos may lose licence over money-laundering fears

Government admits it has lost track of 100’s of British jihadis in Syria and Iraq fighting for ISIS

IVF pioneer jokes how couples could in future get pregnant by sending skin cells to Amazon and receiving a baby in return

NUS apologise after omitting Judaism from religions survey for 2nd time in six months

Transgender burglar wants to move to women’s prison

Transgender model appears in Vogue shoot hailing 100 years of women’s right to vote

Sex robots could make men obsolete

Genetically modified animals could be sold in UK once we leave EU

Health system in CRISIS as £225m goes to Africa’s contraception advice clinics

 

4/1/2018

Children aged 10 addicted to social media: Happiness dependent on number of ‘likes’ they get

Humanists UK calls for home abortion pills after Isle of Man abortion consultation

Freemasons leader rejects claim group is blocking police reform

Stop addressing officers as ‘Sir’, soldiers told as it risks offending people

Schools ‘should help children with social media risk’

More than half of Conservative party members back the death penalty

Vast majority of Conservative Party still opposes same-sex marriage in the UK

Transgender taxi driver now planning dream wedding after scooping £4m lottery win

‘Divorce Day’ – 8 January – looms with post-festive rise in couples considering split

Experts say NHS should freeze eggs of trans teens in case they want kids in future

Teenagers ‘take homeless man to Nando’s for meal but run off laughing leaving him with no food’

3/1/2018

CBeebies embroiled in sexism row after complaint from London Fire Brigade about the word ‘fireman’

Drinking alcohol raises risk of cancer by snapping DNA, scientists find

Abortion clinics will have to display official rating from Care Quality Commission

2/1/2018

Revealed: Almost TWO officers attacked EVERY DAY in West Midlands

Knife crime up 31.3% year on year under Khan

Same-sex couples could soon be biological parents after a huge scientific breakthrough

1/1/2018

Transgender women face angry reaction for using Hampstead Heath ladies pond

31/12/2017

Woman facing intimate procedure asks for female nurse – gets transsexual stubbly male

Number of rapes and sexual assaults reported by female university students soars/

30/12/2017

20,000 British men interested in sexually abusing children – police warn they can’t cope with paedophile epidemic

Ladbrokes Coral agrees to £4billion takeover by Sportingbet owner GVC to create betting industry giant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What kind of Brexit?

Theresa May has stated Britain will leave the EU's Single Market after Brexit. Does the May Deal do that?
Theresa May has stated Britain will leave the EU's Single Market after Brexit. Does the May Deal do that?
Theresa May has stated Britain will leave the EU's Single Market after Brexit.
Theresa May has stated Britain will leave the EU’s Single Market after Brexit.

There is everything to pray for as her majesty’s ministers meet today and tomorrow to discuss what kind of Brexit they will propose to the European Union as negotiations move onto the UK’s trading relationship with the EU.

The BBC’s Norman Smith says some ministers, ‘like Chancellor Philip Hammond and Home Secretary Amber Rudd’ want the UK to stick closely to the EU’s single market to preserve access for British firms.

Others, he says, ‘like Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and Michael Gove’, want ‘more divergence so the UK has more freedom to strike its own trade deals with other countries’.

The United Kingdom is ripe for judgment.  Indeed, the judgment is falling. We are becoming more secularist, more crass, less respectful, more immoral, more acquisitive and more brutal almost week by week, as our weekly news round-up shows. The prophet said:

Habakkuk 3:2 O LORD, I have heard thy speech, and was afraid: O LORD, revive thy work in the midst of the years, in the midst of the years make known; in wrath remember mercy.

We should pray fervently for the Lord to grant national repentance in his mercy. Much of our society is in a state of disorder.  British troops are still unnecessarily deployed abroad.  We must also pray for peace:

Jer 29:7 And seek the peace of the city whither I have caused you to be carried away captives, and pray unto the LORD for it: for in the peace thereof shall ye have peace.

The Hebrew word ‘shalom’ also includes prosperity. Ours is historically a trading nation. Much of our economy depends on trade overseas. Which Brexit outcome will best help the sort of trade which assists peace and prosperity? What should we pray for?

Is reversing Brexit an option?

Tony Blair and Jack Straw signing the EU Constitution in the same room in Rome as where the Treaty of Rome was signed.
Tony Blair and Jack Straw signing the EU Constitution in the same room in Rome as where the Treaty of Rome was signed.

The arch-remoaners want the UK to stay in the EU. According to the Independent, Former Prime Minister Tony Blair says Labour should even prioritise stopping Brexit ahead of winning the next election.

Early last year, I made a video record of my travels around three European capitals. I came to the conclusion the European Union was deliberately conceived as a revived Roman Empire.

That means it is at war with Christ:

Rev 17:14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

To have any chance of being on the right side in that battle, the Government must honour last year’s referendum result. We can see the June 2016 result as an answer to prayer.

Pro-Brexit: Suella Fernandes MP
Pro-Brexit: Suella Fernandes MP

However, so is the presence of Brexiteers (albeit of the closet variety) at the top of today’s Labour Party. Mr Blair’s calls will by the grace of God fall on deaf ears.

In another column in the Indy, Conservative MP Suella Fernandes remembers how much Tony Blair destroyed confidence in politics.  We well remember the Iraq incursion.

But the MP also accuses Mr Blair of failing to give the British people a say on the EU’s proposed constitution. She says: ‘The electorate’s and Parliament’s clear will is to leave the EU. Reversing that now would be deeply divisive, fundamentally undemocratic and destroy the trust of the British people who now just want the government to get on with delivering Brexit.’

Remainers to be coordinated

Lord Malloch-Brown seeks to coordinate the Remainers
Lord Malloch-Brown seeks to coordinate the Remainers

And yet the Guardian reported over the weekend: ‘One of Britain’s most senior former diplomats, Lord Malloch-Brown, is to take a lead role in coordinating the pro-remain groups towards a more coherent campaign focused on shifting public opinion before MPs hold a “meaningful vote” next autumn on Theresa May’s Brexit deal.’

Lord Malloch-Brown is trying to coordinate his own Best for Britain, Open Britain and the European Movement.  If they cannot actually reverse the Brexit decision, the groups will try to force a ‘soft Brexit.’ This would keep Britain in the Single Market and Customs Union.

But Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson says such an option would leave the UK as a ‘vassal state’ of the EU. We should be beholden to the bloc for our trade rules, unable to trade freely outside, but have no say in EU policy.
In an interview with The Sunday Times, Mr Johnson said any deal must give Britain ‘that important freedom to decide our own regulatory framework, our own laws and do things in a distinctive way’.

He said if the UK was forced to mirror EU laws, many people ‘would say, “What is the point of what you have achieved?” because we would have gone from a member state to a vassal state.’

No Deal, Canada or Norway?

At the opposite end is the ‘no deal’ scenario, in which Britain leaves the EU with no agreement. The UK would rely on World Trade Organisation tariffs to trade with firms in the EU and elsewhere. We should also be totally free to strike trade deals around the world.  But 25% of our financial services depend on EU trade.  A last-minute collapse in negotiations would be the proverbial ‘cliff-edge’.  No-one would be prepared.

Norway has an agreement with the EU which gives it membership of the European Economic Area, the EEA. This gives the country full access to the EU’s Single Maket.  Fullfact.org said in August 2016 Norway was then paying the EU around £740 million compared to the UK’s £14,000 million a year to be a full member. They said ‘This translates to £140 per Norwegian, compared to £220 per Brit.’

A ‘Norway’ agreement would ensure virtually seamless trade with the EU.  Nevertheless, it would be expensive and would constrain the UK in negotiating abroad.  And Mrs May has ruled out staying in the Single Market.

Theresa May and David Davis appear to favour instead the ‘Canada’ model with additions.  This is called ‘Canada-plus’ or even ‘plus-plus-plus’.

Negotiate free trade agreements

City AM says this: ‘Under this option, the UK would enter into a free trade agreement in goods with the EU along the lines of the agreement just concluded between the EU and Canada.

‘In addition, free trade in services and possibly in agriculture would ideally be agreed to as an add-on. At the same time, pursuing its broader Drakean strategy, the UK would negotiate free trade agreements with other, more economically vibrant, partners such as China, the US and India.’

But firstly, the EU insists free trade in services must be linked to freedom of movement of people. Secondly, ‘Canada-plus’ would take more time to negotiate than the fifteen months the two sides have left.

City AM even quotes scripture:

Eccl 3:1 To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:

From this scripture, it says slowing down the Brexit process was smart, but it is now to get on with negotiations.

Wisdom comes from the fear of the Lord

But another scripture now comes into play:

Prov 9:10 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding.

For prayer, our first objective must be for the Lord to safeguard the principle of Brexit. The spiritual dimension is vital. It says the UK cannot safely stay in a revived Roman Empire.  Moving on from that, our prayer is for Her Majesty’s Government to seek a level of wisdom which only comes from the Lord himself.  Which trade model will really be best for Britain? We will all have our own ideas. We cry to the Lord to have mercy, because unexpected things can happen:

Eccl 9:11 I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.

Pray the Lord will at some stage make us stand, look up, and say: ‘How did you do that?’

Click on the buttons below to share this article:

News round-up including: Gender survey for 10-year-olds is dangerous folly

3
Children's Gender Survey Is "Dangerous Folly"
Children's Gender Survey Is "Dangerous Folly"

Children's Gender Survey Is "Dangerous Folly"

15/12/2017

Number of children penalised for knife possession rises 16%

14/12/2017

UK report: Muslim men are 200 Times More Likely To Rape Children

A QUARTER of teens smoke marijuana: New figures reveal young people are shunning hard drugs and cigarettes for vaping and weed

Gender survey for 10-year-olds is a dangerous folly, says STEPHEN POLLARD

13/12/2017

Muslim dentistry student had bomb-making material and video on tactics for stabbing and beheading

Transgender man, 30, gives birth to his (actually should be ‘her’) second child following SEVEN DAY labour four years after transition from a woman

Primary school heads under pressure from unions to get pupils to celebrate trans community

Primary schools should use books that feature transgender parents, Government-backed guidance says

Parents’ fury as school bans kids from wearing their own thick winter coats over uniform despite freezing temperatures

12/12/2017

Twitter blasted for allowing perverts to share their vile fantasies online because it’s ‘not illegal’

‘Children as young as 11 introduced to gambling’

Muslim columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown says Christmas is “Islamophobic”

Children lured into gambling

11/12/2017

Three out of four small and medium-sized businesses not ready for new data laws face huge fines

Three out of four small and medium-sized businesses not ready for new data laws face huge fines

Fat child taken into care by after their parents let them eat too much

Loneliness killing us, with parents and children some of worst hit

Burglars threatened to hurt newborn baby

NHS asks 10-year-olds if they’re ‘comfortable in their gender’ in official transgender survey for schoolchildren

10/12/2017

Straight couples could be allowed to have civil partnerships thanks to new Parliament bill

Christian teacher ‘suing school after suspension for calling transgender pupil ‘girl’ instead of a boy’

Christmas in the Koran — how Maryam gave birth to Jesus under a date palm

84% of men convicted of grooming young white girls are Asian and see them as ‘easy targets’ for sex

Jailed female killer ‘now a MAN’ in women-only prison demands NHS pays for her operation

Boy, 14, arrested over 14yr murder who was found dying stabbed outside school

The Son of God WASN’T born in a stable claims new TV show

9/12/2017

Heavily pregnant young woman ‘ejected from cab so driver could take drinkers to bar’

8/12/2017

Miss Transgender UK – Winner To The World!

Hormonal contraception increase breast cancer risk by 20%

Lord Pearson warned colleagues about an eventual Muslim ‘takeover’ of parts of British society

7/12/2017

Lesbian couple escape jail after conning relative out of £1,000s because he was ‘a bit slow’ and didn’t notice being tricked

1 in 5 Brit’s don’t know Jesus birth marked on Christmas day

6/12/2017

Lord Pearson sticks up for Christians

27/11/2017

Cleft lip palette abortions rise

Revoke Prince George Gay Prayer!

Provost Kelvin Holdsworth prayed for Prince George to be homosexual.
Provost Kelvin Holdsworth prayed for Prince George to be homosexual.
Provost Kelvin Holdsworth prayed for Prince George to be homosexual.
Provost Kelvin Holdsworth prayed for Prince George to be homosexual.

A renegade Scottish churchman has prayed for little Prince George to turn out homosexual.

We must come against this prayer in the power of the Holy Spirit. The people of God shall revoke the curse of the evil prayer by words of peace and righteousness and praying good for the young third-in-line to the throne.

Year-old blog post

The Very Reverend Kelvin Holdsworth wrote a blog post last year urging people to pray Prince George ‘to be blessed one day with the love of a fine young gentleman.’ Mr Holdsworth is provost of St Mary’s Cathedral in Glasgow. He is from the Scottish Episcopal Church, which voted to allow gay couples to gay-marry earlier this year. The BBC reported the story here.

Same-sex marriages in Anglican churches are banned in England and in Wales

In his blog post, Mr Holdsworth said that if Prince William’s four-year-old son married another man in the future it would help the Church of England become more inclusive.

‘A royal wedding might sort things out remarkably easily though we might have to wait 25 years for that to happen,’ he wrote.

‘Who knows whether that might be sooner than things might work out by other means?’

Royal wedding hijacked

Provost Holdsworth hijacked the wedding of Prince Harry & Meghan Markle
Provost Holdsworth hijacked the wedding of Prince Harry & Meghan Markle

He tweeted the post again following the news of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s engagement.

‘This quote seems to be getting a lot of attention because it was picked up by a number of anti-gay campaigners in the Church of England,’ he said.

‘It is a shame that the happy news about the royal wedding has been hijacked in this way.’

(Which is a strange comment from one who hijacked it in the first place by retweeting a year-old post to make a pro-sodomy political point at the expense of Prince George off the back of Harry and Meghan’s forthcoming wedding.)

‘Unkind and destructive’

Gavin Ashenden, a former chaplain to the Queen and a Christian Episcopal Church missionary bishop, said the comments were not Christian.

‘To use prayer as a mechanism for wishing this on Prince George is an unkind and destructive thing to do,’ he told the BBC.  It doesn’t have the prince’s best interests at heart, but uses him as a gender-political football to please 1.7% of the population.

‘What is especially odd and incongruous is the fact that it is suddenly OK to pray for someone to be gay, but totally unacceptable to pray for them to be free from being gay and to resume a sexuality that was in tune with their biology.

‘This seems not only contradictory but hypocritical.’

According to the Independent, Mr Ashenden told Christian Today: ‘It is an unkind and destabilising prayer. It is the theological equivalent of the curse of the wicked fairy in one of the fairy tales.

‘To co-opt the Royal children to service a narrow sexual agenda seems particularly tasteless.’

Bishop less than impressed

Susie Leafe, the director of the conservative evangelical group Reform, was also critical of Mr Holdsworth’s blog about Prince George.  ‘I was very disappointed that he was prepared to bring a child in to this same-sex marriage debate,’ she told the BBC.

‘As a Christian minister he should pray for all people to come to know the love of Christ, rather than a fine young gentleman.’

Rt Rev Dr Gregor Duncan, Bishop of Glasgow and Galloway, indicated he was not at all pleased. He said: ‘The comments made by Provost Holdsworth were made on his personal blog.

‘As his blog indicates, the views expressed there are his personal ones.

‘They do not represent an official view of the Scottish Episcopal Church nor are they ones with which I would concur. I will be discussing this matter with Provost Holdsworth.’

Reality of homosexuality

The cover of King & King, a campaigning book for school sex education designed to groom children into accepting homosexuality as normal. Parents should be on their guard.
The cover of King & King, a campaigning book for school sex education designed to groom children into accepting homosexuality as normal. Parents should be on their guard.

Gay activists maintain, contrary to the scientific evidence, that people are ‘born gay.’ They say it is impossible to change sexuality. If they are right, it is already determined whether Prince George is ‘straight’ or ‘gay’. The renegade provost would be praying for something which has already happened – or rather, not happened.

Some of us will acknowledge one can pray after the event, not knowing the outcome. The theology of that says the Lord knows we shall pray before we actually do, and he plainly has the capacity to change events according to the imminent prayer.

But the reality is that a combination of factors come into play in human development. As children grow up, many factors influence their young lives. Mothers have a role in leading their children to grow up normally.

It is especially important for fathers to affirm their sons in their maleness and their daughters in their femininity. Parents must also ‘recruit-proof’ their children by safeguarding them from predatory males – and some females – in the outside world.

Parents should also be on their guard for materials in school sex education designed to groom children into acceptance of homosexuality.  The campaigning book ‘King and king’ is particularly pertinent here.

Identification with the aggressor

Tragically, many boys who would have grown up normally ended up in children’s homes in the recent past. There, firstly, pederast homosexuals got hold of them. Secondly, the boys identified with the aggressor. Look up ‘Stockholm Syndrome’. Thirdly, they grew up homosexual themselves, with the desire to repeat the pattern.

The inbuilt self-limitation of homosexuality is why gay men in particular have so many sexual partners. They are searching for affirmative maleness, but now sexualising it. They become involved in increasingly depraved sexual practice as they become immersed in the network. And, sorry Provost, but homosexual life is filled with more dirty boys than ‘fine young gentlemen’. That’s just the way it is. They are looking for what does not exist, a real man who will love a homosexual. And they are pressing a part of the anatomy perfectly designed for the extraction of water from bodily waste into a use our gracious Maker never intended.

Ex-gays in Corinth

But the good news is however anyone became gay they do not have to stay gay. Jesus Christ saves the lost, forgives their sin and transforms their lives. Christ can heal the underlying pathologies which arrested normal development. People, men and women, have walked away from the homosexual life and homosexual desires. Scripture says:

1Cor 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

Yes, there were ex-gays in the Corinthian church. But they were washed clean, sanctified and justified by the Holy Spirit in the name of Jesus. Recognise also that the practice and thoughts of homosexuality can lay a person open to spiritual oppression. For some, healing may not be enough. Deliverance could be in order.

Prayer Warfare

Christian Voice members know how seldom we comment on matters to do with the church. As in ‘Never’. There are enough targets for prayer in government, commerce and the judiciary. So we shall not cast more aspersions than we have on Provost Holdsworth. The Lord knows his eternal destiny. Those leaving comments please respect this position as well. But firstly, his subject-matter has allowed us to set out the context. Secondly, we urgently need to invite the Lord’s people into a campaign of prayer warfare over this issue. Thirdly, we have been able to praise Rev Gavin Ashenden and the Bishop of Glasgow. They have made clear a prayer such as that of the Provost has no place in the Christian faith.

We should be comforted by these scriptures, from the book of Proverbs:

Proverbs 15:8 The sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination to the LORD: but the prayer of the upright is his delight.  … 29 The LORD is far from the wicked: but he heareth the prayer of the righteous.
Prov 28:9 He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be abomination.
Prov 26:2 As the bird by wandering, as the swallow by flying, so the curse causeless shall not come.

Pushing at a open door

Equally, the Provost’s prayer, even as a wicked incantation, has undoubtedly set in motion something evil in the spiritual realm. However, in countering it, let us realise we are pushing at an open door. Twice in the last century the Lord took a bad man out of the way and placed a man of God upon the throne of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Both King George V and King George VI had elder brothers quite unsuited to leading this United Kingdom through a time of war. God took Prince Albert by pneumonia. Edward VIII renounced the throne for the love of divorced Mrs Wallis Simpson.

Moreover, very recently, the wedding of William and Kate set the Parliamentary feminists in a spin. What if their first-born was a girl and a son came second? He would take precedence over her under the ancient rules of primogeniture. That, said the feminists, was unfair. Nick Clegg MP, the Deputy Prime Minister, introduced a ‘Succession to the Crown’ Bill. It changed the rule that the eldest son of a monarch would succeed to the throne. The Bill became an Act of Parliament on 25th April 2013. From that date, the eldest royal child would be next in line, male or female.

Hand of God on Prince George

Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge with their children Prince George and Princess Charlotte. Look how intently the Duke is looking at Prince George. There will be no bad influences in this family, in Jesus's name.
Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge with their children Prince George and Princess Charlotte. Look how intently the Duke is looking at Prince George. There will be no bad influences in this family, in Jesus’s name.

And then, to confound them all, the Duchess of Cambridge, as she had become, gave birth to a boy. To the dismay of the feminists, the nation welcomed George not Georgina.

So we believe the hand of God is already on this princely child. The Lord will ensure George grows up normally. There will be no undue influences upon him.

God knows parents are raising all children today against a background of pro-sodomy state dogma.

Nevertheless, pray the Lord will safeguard George as his father affirms his masculinity in his formative years.

Prince George will progress into true manhood, in Jesus’s name.

Finally, thank God for Gavin Ashenden, for Susie Leafe and for Dr Gregor Duncan. We pray for unity in the church of Jesus Christ and that all in leadership will heed Paul’s word to Timothy:

2Tim 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

Click on the links below to share this story:

Australia allows ‘gay-marriage’

Australia has voted for 'gay marriage' and gay activists are delighted. This march took place in Melbourne
Australia has voted for 'gay marriage' and gay activists are delighted. This march took place in Melbourne
Australia has voted for 'gay marriage' and gay activists are delighted. This march took place in Melbourne
Australia has voted for ‘gay marriage’ and gay activists are delighted. This march took place in Melbourne

Australia has voted overwhelmingly in favour of legalising same-sex marriage, reports the BBC.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics said 61.6% of people were in favour allowing same-sex couples to counterfeit marriage. 79.5% of voters took part in the non-binding postal vote.

Jubilant supporters celebrated in public spaces, waving rainbow flags and singing and dancing.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said his government would aim to pass legislation in parliament by Christmas.

‘[Australians] have spoken in their millions and they have voted overwhelmingly yes for marriage equality,’ Mr Turnbull said after the result was announced.

‘They voted yes for fairness, yes for commitment, yes for love.’

God’s first social institution

The word of God describes marriage as God’s first social institution:

'Vote No' campaigners stressed the family
‘Vote No’ campaigners stressed the family

Genesis 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. 24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Moreover, those words were reinforced by the Lord Jesus himself:

Mark10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. 7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; 8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.

Becoming ‘one flesh’ in the full emotional, spiritual and physical sense is something a pair of gays, or two women, cannot do. A pair of homosexuals can never engage in the defining act of marriage. So they engage in a variety of confected quasi-sexual activities, all of which are condemned in scripture:

Lev 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

So, despite what Mr Turnbull says, homosexals won’t have equality or fairness.  Nature itself is against them. It won’t be committment, because their relationships are inherently transient. As for love, people – brothers, a father and son, comrades in arms – can love each other without feeling the need to press the part of the body perfectly designed for the extraction of water from bodily waste into a use our gracious Maker never intended.

How gender is taught in schools

Felix Ngole was expelled for calling gay ‘marriage’ a sin on Facebook and an English court upheld it.
Felix Ngole was expelled for calling gay ‘marriage’ a sin on Facebook and an English court upheld it.

Australia’s No campaign put the focus on the definition of family.  They also raised concerns about how issues like gender will be taught in schools.

Their concerns are well founded. England and Wales allowed homosexuals to get gay-married in 2013 under David Cameron’s Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act. Theresa May described the measure recently as one of her greatest achievements. Scotland followed in 2014. Only Northern Ireland holds out against the tide of sodomy.

Consequently, since 2013, students and local authority workers have been harassed by the authorities for expressing traditionalist, Christian views. Many have been thrown off courses or lost their jobs.

In addition, the earlier Equality Act 2010 laid a duty on public authorities to advance homosexuality and transgenderism.  A public authority is anything from a fire brigade to a hospital to a government department to a school.

Taken together, the UK’s Equality Act and Britain’s ‘gay marriage’ Act have given the green light to activist head teachers and Stonewall’s gay activists to groom schoolchildren into positive views of a lifestyle characterised by disease, degradation and early death. The Apostle Paul wrote to the church in Rome:

J D Unwin discovered that no civilisation which allowed its family structure to crumble escaped going down the rubbish chute of history.
J D Unwin discovered that no civilisation which allowed its family structure to crumble escaped going down the rubbish chute of history.

Romans 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Sex and Culture

In his book Sex and Culture, anthropologist J.D. Unwin, warned that loose sexual mores would lead to cultural decline in the West.

The website EthikaPolitika says: ‘After a careful evaluation a variety of civilizations—including the Romans, Greeks, Sumerians, Moors, Babylonians, and Anglo-Saxons—a clear pattern emerged for Unwin: a perfect correlation between sexual fidelity and civilizational flourishing.

‘Though each civilization’s success correlated with strict sexual ethics, attitudes toward sex became increasingly liberalized and loosened. The consequences of the myth that sexual activity and its impacts could be confined to the private sphere soon became apparent. Premarital, extramarital and homosexual relationships proliferated and individuals began placing their individual desires over the common good. An increase in promiscuity corresponded to a subsequent decrease in the social energy required for civilizational maintenance and innovation. Ultimately, each civilization became less cohesive, less aggressive, and less resolute.’

Unwin said: ‘These societies lived in different geographical environments; they belonged to different racial stocks; but the history of their marriage customs is the same. In the beginning each society had the same ideas in regard to sexual regulations. Then the same struggles took place, the same sentiments were expressed, the same changes were made, the same results ensued. Each society reduced its sexual opportunity to a minimum and displaying great social energy, flourished greatly. Then it extended its sexual opportunity; its energy decreased, and faded away. The one outstanding feature of the whole story is its unrelieved monotony.’

Where ‘gay marriage’ is legal

In the whole of Africa, only South Africa, under a constitution drafted by Westerners, allows homosexuals to get 'gay-married'
In the whole of Africa, only South Africa, under a constitution drafted by Westerners, allows homosexuals to get ‘gay-married’

Australia has joined not just Great Britain, but Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, some states of the United States and Uruguay.

Russia and Eastern Europe, Africa, apart from South Africa, and Asia, apart from Taiwan, are holding out.

Furthermore, many of those nations make the commission of unnatural acts a criminal offence.

Those countries which have legalised what Almighty God describes as an abomination, and then devalued God’s institution of marriage, are heading for judgment and disaster.

Unwin concluded: ‘Civilizations in this liminal phase then collapsed from either 1) an internal anarchic revolution, or 2) conquest by invaders with greater social energy.’

Now who could those ‘invaders with greater social energy’ be in Europe, Australia and the Western world in the twenty-first century?

Only hope is in repentance

There is however hope for each individual homosexual, as scripture speaks of them, and many other sinners, finding forgivness and release from the power of sin:

1Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

Moreover, there is hope for Australia, Britain and the rest of the decadent West, but only if Christian men will rise up and proclaim the crown rights of King Jesus, calling for and praying for national repentance. There are not many organisations today which will give you the theological tools to do that, but Christian Voice is one of them, and you can join us on the link below:

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

(Just clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Tesco and the Christmas Turkey

Muslim women clutch a Tesco shopping bag. But Tesco don't have a halal turkey for them.
Muslim women clutch a Tesco shopping bag. But Tesco don't have a halal turkey for them.
Muslim women clutch a Tesco shopping bag. But Muslims don't believe the truth of Christmas and Tesco don't even have a halal turkey for them.
Muslim women clutch a Tesco shopping bag. But Muslims don’t believe the truth of Christmas and Tesco don’t even have a halal turkey for them.

Supermarket chain Tesco are under fire for including a Muslim family in an advertisement about Christmas. ‘However you do Christmas, we’ve got a turkey for you.’

Here is the story in the Independent.

Tesco want ad award

Naturally, the ad is supposed to be ‘inclusive’ and ‘promoting diversity’.

But a supermarket does not have to do that.  All it needs to do is make money for shareholders.

It does that by selling what it puts on the shelves.  Moreover, it does that by bringing in customers, not by putting them off.  Tesco did not have to sponsor London Gay Pride in 2012 either.  But they did that too.  And it backfired on them as disaster followed financial disaster in the succeeding years.  Of course there are a couple of gays in the advert, one of whom is holding a baby, just so we get that grindingly politically-correct point as well.

So what we have here is a combination of social engineering and virtue signalling.  Perhaps the food giant’s bosses are hoping for some kind of award for their advert.  And there are hundreds of those to apply for.

No, we are not being ‘racist’

LBC's Maajid Nawaz in full flow
LBC’s Maajid Nawaz in full flow

Some are crying ‘racism’ here, as has LBC’s Maajid Nawaz.  Mr Nawaz is deliberately trying to obscure the actual point.  And he is hoping the smear will make us back off.  But this is not a race matter.  It is to do with religion.  There is a black woman and an Asian family in the advert.  No-one is complaining about that.  It’s the women showing off their hijabs (headscarves) which has struck a discordant note.

Moreover, this is a deliberate, gratuitous, incongruous inclusion of Muslims in an advert about Christmas.  And why are Muslims out of place in a Christmas ad?  It is because Christmas is a religious festival.  Also, it is because Christian festivals such as Advent, Christmas, Easter and Whtisun proclaim this nation’s Christian heritage.  Above all, it is because Christmas celebrates God becoming one of us in his Son, the Lord Jesus Christ:

John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Muslims deny Christmas:

And that is an event Muslims and their Quran maintain did not happen:

Surah 19, Mary:  88. They say: “((Allah)) Most Gracious has begotten a son!”  89. Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!  90. At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down
in utter ruin,  91. That they should invoke a son for ((Allah)) Most Gracious.  92. For it is not consonant with the majesty of ((Allah)) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.

Surah 3, The House Of ‘Imran: 59. The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: “Be”. And he was.

Surah 4, Women:  171. O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the
truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) an apostle of Allah, and His Word, which
He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him:

Total hypocrisy

And now for the totally hypocritical part.  Tesco are not even selling halal turkeys.  So if you are Muslim, Tesco do not have a turkey for you.  They sell halal lamb and chicken however without telling customers it has been dedicated to Allah.  So not to include turkeys is a good thing.  Every little helps.  But don’t pretend you have a turkey for everyone when you don’t.

To be fair, many Tesco stores support food banks, most of which are run by churches.  They often allow collections of tinned food.  But to think a good deed outweighs an evil one is to fall into the Muslim error itself.  There is only one who forgives sin, and his name is Jesus.

So once again, just like over London Gay Pride, we are calling for a boycott of Tesco.  Tesco are trying to take Christ out of Christmas.  So let Christians and all who value the UK’s Christian heritage buy our Christmas turkey elsewhere.  Moreover, let us pray that Tesco will have mountains of turkeys left unsold.  Lastly, let us pray God will be glorified and that supermarket bosses will trust in Jesus.

Petition

Sign our petition calling for a boycott of Tesco:

https://www.petitions24.com/boycott_tesco_over_muslim_advert

Click on the links below to share this story:

 

Prince William blames Africans for wildlife decline

Prince WIlliam speaking at the Tusk dinner. Yes, that is entrepreneur Deborah Meaden in the background.
Prince WIlliam speaking at the Tusk dinner. Yes, that is entrepreneur Deborah Meaden in the background.
Prince WIlliam speaking at the Tusk dinner.  Yes, that is entrepreneur Deborah Meaden in the background.
Prince WIlliam speaking at the Tusk dinner. Yes, that is entrepreneur Deborah Meaden in the background.

Prince William has been accused of racism after blaming a decline in wildlife on Africa’s growing population.

Gala event

The Duke of Cambridge was speaking at a gala event for a conservation charity last week in London. He is royal patron of the Tusk Trust.

As its name suggests, the charity started by opposing the killing of animals for their tusks. However, it now has a wider conservation remit and a long list of ‘great and good’ patrons.

Wildlife and conservation are certainly important if only because many African nations depend on their wildlife for tourism.

Too many Africans

The Prince proposed ‘a strategy that will allow humans and animal species to share the environment.’  He claimed: ‘In my lifetime, we have seen global wildlife populations decline by over half. We are going to have to work much harder, and think much deeper, if we are to ensure that human beings and the other species of animal with which we share this planet can continue to co-exist.’

The World Wildlife Fund came up with the 50% decline figure in 2014. They said it had happened in 40 years.  The Prince is 35.  They blamed ‘climate change’ and ‘the combined impacts of habitat loss and degradation, driven by unsustainable human consumption’.

But not even WWF specifically fingered Africans for the decline as Prince William did:

‘Africa’s rapidly growing human population is predicted to more than double by 2050 – a staggering increase of three and a half million people per month,’ he said. ‘There is no question that this increase puts wildlife and habitat under enormous pressure. Urbanization, infrastructure development, cultivation – all good things in themselves, but they will have a terrible impact unless we begin to plan and to take measures now.’

Duke of Edinburgh’s viral reincarnation

HRH did not suggest what sort of ‘planning’ was needed, but it clearly involves reducing at least the rate of increase of Africans. Would his solution be as far-sighted as that of his grandfather?

According to a run-down of his wit in an article in the Guardian, The Duke of Edinburgh said: ‘In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation.’ Another website attributes the sentiment to the Duke’s foreword to a book ‘If I Were an Animal’ (1987) by Fleur Cowles. Mercifully, we are given just the one life to live:

Hebrews 9:27  And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

In 2011 Prince Philip said he still believed a growing human population was the biggest challenge to conservation. He kindly ruled out mass sterilization. ‘Voluntary family limitation’, whatever that means, was the only way to tackle what he saw as this huge problem.

Overpopulation is a myth

The truth is, overpopulation, beloved of Malthusians, royal and commoner alike, is an atheist myth. Environmental scientist Erle Ellis debunks it in this article in the New Times. And here is a website dedicated to the subject.  The most populous countries are the wealthiest, and as populations become wealthier, their family sizes reduce. We actually need population increase for economic growth and to support the elderly. The real population problem is Europeans not even replacing their numbers. That is leading to ageing populations and a pensions crisis.

The world is not overpopulated, and certainly not overpopulated with Africans. The average population density of Africa is 39.1 inhabitants per square kilometre.  Reference Wikipedia.  The corresponding figure for Europe is 59.
Reference Wikipedia.  Meanwhile, the population density (people per sq. km) in China was reported at 147 in 2016, according to the World Bank.  Reference TradingEconomics.  Putting all that in perspective, the equivalent figure for the United Kingdom is 271.  Reference TradingEconomics

Prince William doing his bit

The royal family have certainly done their bit to achieve that UK figure. The Duchess of Cambridge is currently expecting Prince William’s third child. The Duke of Edinburgh fathered four children.  OK, the Tusk Trust might have written most of Prince William’s speech.  There are many similarities with positions on their website.  But the charity does not quite blame Africans and their natural fecundity for decreases in wildlife populations.  That appears to have been the Prince’s own idea.  The Bible records the Lord’s creation mandate to Adam and Eve:

Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them (Adam and Eve), and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

The Lord has yet to modify that with ‘Hold on, there’s too many of you – and definitely too many black people’.

The Duke of Cambridge would do well to apologise for his racism, seek humility and the word of Almighty God and learn the truth about human populations.

Click on the links below to share this article:

Medway Council’s Emotional Abuse

Sara Root was taken to court for contempt by Medway Council
Sara Root was taken to court for contempt by Medway Council
Medway Council took Sara Root to Maidstone County Court for contempt.
Medway Council took Sara Root to Maidstone County Court for contempt.

A mother who says her two youngest children were wrongly taken into care by Medway Council was given a six-month suspended prison sentence at the end of last month by Judge Richard Polden

Sara Root told Christian Voice her children were taken seven years ago for ‘emotional abuse’.

District Judge Graham Green made a judgment which will concern home-schoolers up and down the land.. Medway satisfied the judge the son and daughter were suffering the said emotional abuse due to home schooling. This had given them, said Medway’s Ian Scrivens, a ‘skewed view of the world’. Despite attending a primary school, playing with other children and going out to the park and the cinema, they were not ‘socialising.’

Legal Statement

Sara Root was found guilty in July, as we reported at the time. But in July we did not feel able to identify the mother. Now that she has been sentenced, the court authorised this legal statement:

In relation to C00ME422. On 30th August 2017, at Maidstone County Court, His Honour Judge Polden sentenced Sara Root to a custodial sentence of six months, suspended for twelve months, for contempt of court. The basis of that sentence was that: (a) she had breached an injunction made under section 12 of the Administration of Justice 1960 on 13th December 2011 on ten occasions; (b) she was in breach of an undertaking she gave to the court on 12th December 2016; and (c) she failed to comply with reporting restrictions made at the same hearing. All of the breaches were occasioned by publishing material relating to care proceedings on Facebook and failing to remove it.

September hearing

Ms Root is now applying to the High Court to remove the injunctions. Her two children are now young adults aged respectively 18 and 19, she told Christian Voice. Therefore they are no longer subject to any care order. Not surprisingly, she would like to make contact with them again. But in a bizarre twist, Medway Council have applied for non-molestation orders on behalf of the two young adults. Their only evidence appears to be hearsay.

Social worker Kelly Hopper had to admit in court she was not even in touch with Ms Root’s children. Meanwhile, ‘support worker’ Lucy Conn has made a statement. We understand this discloses that the young man involved does not even want Medway Council to speak on his behalf. The case will be heard behind closed doors at the Royal Courts of Justice on 28th September.

Contempt removes some secrecy

The family courts are shrouded in secrecy. Those in social services and the child protection industry say this is to protect the children involved. But it also means parents cannot easily bring injustices to the light. The media are also loathe to report cases. Editors fear they may fall foul of contempt of court rules. So in practice, the secrecy rules protect the system.

The only reason Sara Root and Eugene Lukjanenko can be named is because Medway Council brought actions against them for contempt of court, which carries a maximum penalty of two years in prison. Family court judges still hear such cases. Nevertheless, the cases have to be held in open court in the civil court, rather than the family court. This is because the British legal jurisdictions do not ‘disappear’ people. Anyone facing jail must be named. This does not mean the media can then name any children involved, nor do we want to. But we can and shall name local authorities and social workers.

Medway Council rooftop protest

Eugene Lukjanenko was convicted of contempt at Canterbury County Court in January and July 2017
Eugene Lukjanenko was convicted of contempt at Canterbury County Court in January and July 2017

Meanwhile, concert pianist Eugene Lukjanenko occupied the porch roof of Medway Council offices in Chatham last week. He remains in dispute with Medway over access to his son in care. However, above all, he wants his son returned, and his son, who is 14, also wants to come home. With worrying similarities to the Sara Root case, Mr Lukjanenko also says his son his taken away for alleged ’emotional abuse’.

A group of people on the ground also protested against forced adoption & foster care. Two police cars were called to the protest, where four people were spotted handing out leaflets.  A spokesman from the police said: ‘Officers have been made aware of a protest on a roof in Dock Road, Chatham. Officers were called to the scene at 7.21am on Tuesday 5 September 2017.’

One protester told the local KentOnline newspaper they were calling on the government to investigate the way in which children are taken into care.

Mr Lukjanenko came down from the roof voluntarily at 7.30pm. He was arrested on suspicion of aggravated criminal trespass and causing a public nuisance.

Earlier this year he was twice found in contempt of court for publishing details of case in social media. Mr Lukjanenko was sentenced to 56 days suspended for a year in January 2017 and again, for a separate offence, in July.

Emotional abuse in Medway Council area

The Government’s most recent figures show wide variations in numbers of children taken into care and reasons given. The discrepancy shows up widely in the contrast between the two councils in Kent. These are Kent County Council and, funnily enough, Medway Council.

Kent County Council took 1,049 children into care in 2015-2016. The population of Kent CC area at the last census was 1,541,900. Under 20’s were 360,605. So a Kent child has a 0.29% chance of being ‘in care’.

Medway Council took 539 children into care in 2015-2016. The population of Medway’s council area at the last census was 263,925. Under 20’s were 74,000. So a Medway child has a 0.73% chance of being ‘in care’.
In Kent County Council, 656 children were taken for neglect, 63% of the total and higher than the national average for England. The Council took 203 children for ‘emotional abuse’. That is 19%, which is lower than England’s national average.

But in Medway, 237 children (44%) were taken for neglect and 257 (48%) for emotional abuse. Given Medway’s far lower population, are we really being asked to accept that children in Chatham and Rochester are suffering ‘emotional abuse’ (whatever that is) over six times more than children in Canterbury and Ramsgate?

Or is something rather odd going on in Medway Council Social Services? And if it is, are we justified, to use the old Watergate expression, to ‘follow the money’?