Henry Nowak: Are the people right to protest?
In the light of the shocking police brutality against the dying Henry Nowak, and the various reactions, could the people be more in step with the mind of God than our arrogant leaders?
It is now apparent that our elite have institutionalised the ungodly two-tier policing which Mr Nowak suffered. And they don’t want to admit it.
Watch this article in video on Rumble:
For example, here’s the Chief Constable of Hampshire Police, flatly denying two-tier policing, denying differential treatment, demanding politicians support him, as he makes a half-apology, in an article on LBC. Clearly, he does not like being brought to the light.
‘I can’t breathe’
As the Lord Jesus said:
John 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
The facts are now clear. Eighteen-year-old Henry Nowak, going about his business in Southampton on 3rd December 2025, was murdered by Vickrum Digwa, a twenty-three-old Sikh with an obsession for weapons. Digwa stabbed Henry multiple times, whereupon Digwa’s brother called the police to allege that Henry had racially-abused and attacked Digwa.
The police found Digwa’s father holding Henry up, but he fell to the ground. The police then dragged the university student across the gravel and handcuffed him behind his back, even though he posed no threat. They arrested him merely on the lies of the Digwa family.
They ignored Henry when he said over and over again, ‘I can’t breathe’. They even ridiculed him when he told them repeatedly he had been stabbed. One officer said, ‘I don’t think you have, mate.’
They treated Henry Nowak like a criminal, reading him his ‘rights’, because they believed an entirely false allegation of racism against him. It was only when a policewoman noticed his eyes were unresponsive that she called an ambulance. But it was too late.
All this time, they treated Vickrum Digwa, the actual assailant, with dignity as a fictitious victim of racism. Digwa was already known to Hampshire Police. They investigated him over the alleged theft of weapons from a Sikh gurdwara in Southampton in August twenty-twenty-three. The Daily Express reports that no charges were brought.
Sikhs are allowed to carry ritual knives, known as a Kirpan. But Digwa stabbed Henry Nowak not with a Kirpan but with an eight-inch long dagger. He claimed he carried it as part of his faith. That was another lie.
Family need justice
Mr Nowak’s godmother, Kelly Hatchard, described Henry as ‘loving, caring, intelligent and hardworking’, according to Sky News. His father, Mark Nowak, added Digwa ‘was afforded decency’ and ‘we understand, he was never handcuffed at all’. ‘Henry did not die with dignity. He did not die with the care he deserved. He lost consciousness before anyone believed him,’ his distraught father went on.
On Monday 1st June, the BBC reports Vickrum Digwa was convicted and jailed for life with a minimum of 21 years. Yes, you are right, the Bible says:
Gen 9:6 Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
If there were any justice in our land, Digwa should be facing the death penalty. Without it, the guilt of Henry Nowak’s murder falls on all of us, on the whole society. There are spiritual dimensions to crime which our secularist elite cannot grasp. It’s the elite which always oppose the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder.
‘Sons of belial’
Digwa’s mother, Kiran Kaur, was also convicted of assisting an offender by actively hiding the murder weapon. She awaits sentencing in July. StreamlineFeed reports his father and brother appeared in court the next day facing weapons charges. ITV say police found an arsenal of offensive weapons at their home, including machetes, swords, an air rifle, a flick knife, an extendable baton, knuckledusters, and a traditional kirpan.
It was Digwa’s deception, aided by racism presumptions which are part of policing instructions, which hastened Henry Nowak’s death. The presiding judge dismissed Digwa’s defense as a complete fabrication designed to obscure pure malice. The Bible writers would describe him as a worthless man, a ‘son of belial’ or ‘of worthlessness’:
1Kings 21:13 And there came in two men, children of Belial, and sat before him: and the men of Belial witnessed against him, even against Naboth, in the presence of the people, saying, Naboth did blaspheme God and the king.
They would categorise his family as false witnesses and accessories to murder. Sikh organisations have condemned the Digwa family.
Two-tier policing
In the House of Commons, Nigel Farage insisted the case showed ‘two-tier policing.’ He argued anti-racism guidelines issued to officers had led forces to treat ‘different ethnic groups in different ways’. The Lord forbids exactly that in scripture. It is written:
Exod 12:49 One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you.
Secularists think principles of equality somehow just exist in nature, but they don’t. They claim principles of fairness are universal rather than revealed. Plainly they are not, if God has to spell out the foundations of equality knowing some folk will never be fair-minded left to their own devices. In our own day, to prove the point, the British Establishment itself has accepted and institutionalised inequality in flat contradiction of the divine principle.
In the wake of the racially motivated, unprovoked murder of Caribbean teenager Stephen Lawrence in Eltham, South London in 1993, the Macpherson Report was published six years later. Macpherson established a principle that every complaint about an incident of racism should be recorded and investigated as such.
But the complaint could be subjective. It only needed to be: ‘perceived by the complainant or someone else as an act of racism’. The Macpherson report called for a Ministerial Priority that all police services ‘increase trust and confidence in policing amongst minority ethnic communities.’
That anti-racism policy entrenched anti-white racism into the fabric of our institutions. It diverts the police from nicking criminals into two-tier social engineering. It defies biblical principles of equality before the law.
Starmer resorts to deception
Mr Farage added: ‘Henry’s family have responded to this in just the most extraordinarily dignified way. But I suggest the rest of us respond to this with pure, cold rage.’
Naturally, Keir Starmer also invoked the Nowak family to accuse Mr Farage of ‘Exploiting this tragedy to create grievance and division’. He has accused Elon Musk of the same thing for a tweet which criticised no-one except the police. The tech billionaire was ‘trying to whip up division’.
Well, I think people can recognise a rogue family when they see one. They know Sikhs are among the most law-abiding members of society. Even Tommy Robinson has commended the Sikhs in a video.
Sir Keir is scared because he knows the grievance with the police is already there, and that the real division is between the people and him and his kind, the establishment, the elite. That is why protestors confronted police officers in Southampton, hurling insults, accusations and street furniture at them. The trouble intensified on Tuesday 2nd June and the following day.
And just as with the aftermath of the Southport murders, people protesting, loudly, even violently on the streets against the establishment are being misrepresented and condemned by establishment politicians. On Wednesday morning, Sarah Jones MP, the policing minister, urged people not to ‘overreact’. This secularist Sarah voted to impose same-sex marriage and abortion on demand on Northern Ireland, for LGBT sex education, DIY abortion pills by post, buffer zones with no prayer and assisted suicide. But let’s not overreact.
‘Hijacking this tragedy’
Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, went further. She accused the protesters, or maybe Mr Farage, of ‘hijacking this tragedy to stir up violence and disorder.’ She tells us those criticising the police and the policy have no legitimate concerns. They’ve ‘highjacked’ what both she and Keir Starmer are calling ‘this tragedy’. And, inevitably, ‘Those responsible can expect to face the full force of the law.’ Watch what you tweet, folks.
Shabana told the House of Commons (Watch the Parliament video here from 13:43:16 to 13:45:20ff) or Read the script here:
‘I expect many in this House and many more across this country have now seen the police officer’s bodycam footage, released last night. It is, without question, a disturbing and tragic thing to see.’ (13:43:16 – 13:43:30)
She went on to say: ‘People are rightly asking questions about how the situation was handled and they are shocked, and disquieted, to hear Henry’s words: “I can’t breathe”.’ (13:43:30 – 13:43:40) They are more than ‘shocked and disquieted’, Home Secretary. They are outraged.
We expected to hear the Home Secretary admit that institutionalised procedure on allegations of racism led directly to the mistreatment of Henry Novak by police officers, which was revealed by the body-cam footage. But she didn’t. Instead, would you believe it:
‘Proper Process’ with IOPC
‘There is a proper process to assess whether there have been incidents of police misconduct led by the Independent Office for Police Conduct – the IOPC’ (13:43:45 – 13:43:54) She referred to ‘A proper process’ as she hid behind the IOPC.
‘There have been accusations, I know, of two-tier policing: That one community has been prioritised over another. It will be for the IOPC to determine the facts with regards to this specific case and I cannot and will not comment on them.’ (13:44:29 – 13:44:44)
But it is not ‘the facts’, it’s the two-tier anti-racism policy which is the problem, and it’s that too which she will not comment on. Shabana Mahmood even went on, like a recorded message: ‘The police in this country have a sacred duty: To police without fear or favour.’ (13:44:49 – 13:44:55) They do indeed. The Bible says:
Lev 24:22 Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country: for I am the LORD your God.
It is a sacred duty, coming from the Lord God himself. And then she followed it with a complete manifest untruth. This Shabana said: ‘Everyone in this country is equal before the law.’ (13:44:55 – 13:45:00) But some, we now see, are more equal than others.
Diversion away from police actions
Why can she not admit that? It’s gaslighting. A deliberate untruth. Now watch while she tries to divert us all to focus on the original crime and to ignore the disgraceful actions of the police officers:
‘Let me also be clear about one other thing – a dangerous undercurrent that I have seen in the reaction to this awful crime.’ (13:45:16 – 13:45:20)
No, Ms Mahmood, people are not out on the streets in reaction ‘to this awful crime’. They are outraged not by the crime itself so much as by the treatment by Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary of an innocent man. Why would she duck and dive like that unless the elite have something to hide? Again, she is trying to gaslight us.
If you read or watch her speech, you will be amazed that she continued it by wittering on about ‘knife crime’ and what they claim to be ‘doing’ about it, about ‘Young Futures Hubs’ and ‘positive change’, while MPs nodded in agreement. It is as if they exist in a parallel universe where normal rules of honesty, truth and justice do not apply. Or are they trying to convince themselves of their own rectitude while ignoring reality and just trying to stay in office? Tell us in the comments!
IOPC is not ‘independent’ at all!
Shabana Mahmood said: ‘Threats against police officers are utterly unacceptable’. (13:45:20 – 13:45:25) But apparently, His Majesty’s Government, for whom she speaks, will think the police callousness in their treatment of Henry Novak was entirely acceptable, until such time as her IOPC reports to the contrary.
Did I say ‘her IOPC? The Director General of the so-called Independent Office for Police Conduct is appointed by the Crown on the recommendation of the Home Secretary and the Prime Minister, another lover of ‘proper process’.
The Non-Executive Directors who make up the IOPC’s Unitary Board are publicly appointed directly by the Home Secretary. The IOPC is her creature. It is not ‘independent’ at all.
And according to an investigation into The Macpherson Report from the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee in 2022, the IOPC itself was looking for ‘more cases where there is an indication that disproportionality impacts BAME (that’s ‘black and minority-ethnic’) communities.’
Police Chiefs Council admit ‘two-tier’ approach
The National Police Chiefs Council published an Anti-Racism Commitment in March 2025.
Under ‘Our commitment to racial equity’, it says: “Producing equality of policing outcomes for people from different ethnic groups by responding to individuals and communities according to their specific needs, circumstances and experiences, with understanding that these will be racialised and with the aim of reducing harm. It does not mean treating everyone ‘the same’ or being ‘colour blind’ (racial equality).”
It’s an ‘anti-racism’ document saying people should not be treated equally and that certain groups should be singled out for preferential treatment to advance desired ‘outcomes’. Such an approach is specifically condemned by scripture:
Lev 19:15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.
The BBC reported even minister Sarah Jones said it ‘felt wrong’ yet defended it inexplicably as a ‘values’ document. What kind of values might those be? Shabana Mahmood did not even address it. Scripture keeps on about this principle of equality before the law. Here’s the book of Numbers:
Numb 15:16 One law and one manner shall be for you, and for the stranger that sojourneth with you.
Lack of confidence in the police
A parliamentary survey found that 67% of White adults say they believe the police will treat them fairly compared to 56% of Black adults. To put it round the other way, one third of white adults and just under half of black adults believe the police will not treat them fairly.
Kemi Badenoch wrote after her meeting with the Nowak family: ‘They have asked that we work across political parties and religions to rebuild trust in the police. That trust has been broken because of what happened, and I agree with them on that.’
No wonder people took to the streets. They feel that is their only recourse. They have no faith either in those in office or in the quangos they set up. They have been ignored by the elite, treated with contempt, regarded with disdain by those in authority, dismissed as fascists, plastic nationalists, Reform voters. Of course there are hotheads, even criminal elements, who seize any opportunity to make noise, throw stuff, even loot shops. But they are opportunists. The original grievance provides their cover.
By a strange coincidence, in an interview for a BBC Radio 4 documentary ‘England’s Identity Crisis’, carried out before the Nowak row erupted on Monday 1st June 2026, Mrs Badenoch said tensions in our land could erupt in time into civil war. On Daily Sceptic, David Betz, Professor of War in the Modern World at King’s College London, has said something very similar. Whether the conflict will set the Christian majority against the Muslims or against the elite appears to be the only question.
And it looks like it will require a miraculous change of those in power for the intrinsically-racist anti-racism policy to be abandoned, by God’s grace, along with all the rest of the DEI agenda, unconscious bias training in public bodies, critical race theory, the whole house of cards.
Because even now the head of the National Black Police Association (NPBA) has warned police forces are at risk of making ‘not well thought-out’ changes to the anti-racism guidance. Andy George, a Police Service of Northern Ireland chief inspector, said any move to re-draft the commitment in light of the Nowak case would be ‘reactive’.
Bible supports the protesters!
Do you think this is new, an elite trying it on, seeing what they can get away with before the people rebel? No, it isn’t. In fact, there is a very strong biblical parallel. It’s in the first book of Kings, chapter 12, and also in second Chronicles chapter 10.
King Solomon is dead and his son Rehoboam has succeeded him. The people come to him asking for a reduction in their taxes. He treats them with contempt, saying he will increase their taxes. The people rebelled. Firstly, the ten northern tribes of Israel broke away from the Davidic kingdom of Judah:
1Kings 12:16 … the people answered the king, saying, What portion have we in David? neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse: to your tents, O Israel: now see to thine own house, David. So Israel departed unto their tents.
Secondly, Rehoboam sent out his tax collector, with this result:
1Kings 12:18 Then king Rehoboam sent Adoram, who was over the tribute; and all Israel stoned him with stones, that he died.
Like it or not, there is not one word of condemnation for the people, from the Lord, recorded in either the Kings account or that in Chronicles. All the blame lies with the elite, with Rehoboam, for refusing to be a humble, servant king who would put the interests of the people before his status and his arrogant, autocratic ideology.
And it’s the same here. Our arrogant elite must be replaced by able, humble, God-fearing, truthful, honest men who will put the prosperity and security of the people before their ungodly ideologies. Pray for that, and pray for what you can do to bring it about.
Join us in praying ‘Lord, raise up a leader prepared to proclaim Jesus Christ as King of kings over this United Kingdom and to send the secularist elite packing.’ If you say ‘Amen’ to that, sign our petition below.
Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →
Previous Articles
Makerfield: Reform UK or Restore Britain? →
Starmer on Nakba vs Unite the Kingdom →
Elections: Why the people revolted →
Children told black people ‘cannot be racist’ →
Support us!
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
