I won’t lie to you, they had me fooled.
When those three little girls, Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven and Alice Dasilva Aguiar, aged just nine, were murdered at the Hart Space dance class in Southport on 29th July this year, material quickly circulated on Social Media to the effect that the perpetrator was a Muslim illegal immigrant.
Then the authorities revealed that the killer, one Axel Rudakubana, seen and identified by those who observed it all, was born in Cardiff to Rwandan parents.
In Rwanda, Christians form almost 94 percent of the population. I reasoned the statistical chance of this killer being a Muslim was tiny.
Indeed, the Mirror had a description of him as a ‘quiet choir boy’ from ‘a family heavily involved in the local church’.
So I was putting him down as someone who for some strange reason had become a psychopath.
Twitter ‘misinformation’
What was on Twitter, I thought, was misinformation. And that was what they wanted me to think.
The ‘misinformation’, as it was dubbed, sparked the August protests objecting to Muslim illegal immigration, which led to men being sentenced to long stretches in prison for shouting at policemen, and women banged up for repeating the allegations on Twitter, while judge Conor Burns allowed a Muslim man who seriously assaulted three young women in Bradford to walk free from court in the summer’s display of unbiblical two-tier justice.
Now, three months later, it turns out that at least part of what was described as misinformation was true and that the authorities knew that all the time.
The killer, we have to say alleged killer, because despite the evidence of eye-witnesses Rudakubana has not yet been convicted, or even come to trial, is now revealed as an Islamic terrorist after all. He’s been charged with terrorism offences.
Al Qaeda training manual
Three months after searching his home, the authorities now admit they found he downloaded an Al Qaeda training manual.
The Telegraph reports that biological ricin poison was also discovered at Axel Rudakubana’s home during a search in early August.
There is no way this is a plant by the police. The last thing the establishment wanted was to have to admit to an Islamic connection to the Southport murders.
This information has been dragged out of them. Even now, those in office are trying to downplay it.
The Guardian quotes Dr. Renu Bindra from the UK Health Security Agency, emphasising there was ‘no evidence’ of exposure to ricin for first responders, the public, or anyone at Hart Space. She said its experts assessed the risk to the wider public as “low”.’
Axel Rudakubana was seen to murder three little girls. He injured eight other children and two adults. But you can count yourself reassured that the risk to the wider public of the ricin he had made was ‘low’.
Ask us to come and speak at your church →
Sacred Cow of Multiculturalism
Here’s the Prophet Jeremiah talking about our leaders:
Jer 6:13 For from the least of them even unto the greatest of them every one is given to covetousness; and from the prophet even unto the priest every one dealeth falsely.
Jer 6:14b … saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.
Those who raised misgivings about unfettered Muslim immigration were right to do so. They cared, yet neither Sir Keir Starmer nor his Home Secretary Yvette Cooper would discuss the matter. Why? Because even to admit it’s an issue would offend their cherished idea, their sacred cow of anti-Christian multiculturalism.
The Lord Jesus assured us, whlie critising hypocrisy in leadership:
Luke 12:2 For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known.
Stuff is going to come out, but our leaders hope that by the time it does, people will have forgotten their initial anger and the public disquiet will have gone off the boil.
Abraham Lincoln is reported to have said:
“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”
Discussion banned in Parliament
All discussion of Southport and questions about when Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper knew the perpetrator was indeed a Muslim terrorist is now even banned in the House of Commons, on the spurious grounds of securing a fair trial and justice, such as it is, without the death penalty, for the families.
Those in office dread the day when Axel Rudakubana comes to trial and is convicted.
There will be street protests from those people who cannot be fooled and have not fooled themselves, a further category of persons President Lincoln did not address.
The Bible says:
Prov 19:1 Better is the poor that walketh in his integrity, than he that is perverse in his lips, and is a fool.
Pray the Lord will raise up God-fearing men of truth and integrity, leaders who do not despise this nation, its Christian heritage, its people, but rather respect and cherish it and them.
You can stand with us by signing our petition below for our leaders to repent and honour the King of kings.
Return to the UK’s Christian Constitution →
Related Story
Judicial corruption: Two-Tier Justice →
Read and pray
READ: Numb 32:23, 35:30-31; 2Chr 7:14; Psa 9:17; Prov 15:9; Isa 26:2; Lam 3:40; Ezek 18:30; Eccl 12:14; Matt 11:24; Rom 13:4; Eph 6:12.
PRAY: Pray the Lord will raise up God-fearing men of truth and integrity.
Pray for families and victims of the Southport attack
Pray for our country.
Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.
Support us!
We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
I am glad that you’ve mentioned this topic, but I was surprised at your conclusion that Rudakubana was a terrorist.
If (as I did) you had downloaded Military Studies in the Jihad against the Tyrants: THE AL-QAEDA TRAINING MANUAL from the US Air Force website on which it is published, and read it, with the reasonable excuse that you were (as I was) fact-checking a news story, and if you had reached the conclusion (as I did) that the section 58 charge of collecting or making, without reasonable excuse, a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism wasn’t likely to result in a conviction that was in the public interest (as the CPS appears to have thought it was), might that deeper research have altered your conclusion that Rudakubana was a terrorist, I wonder?
Making ricin isn’t a terrorist offence. Rudakubana is charged with three murders and eight woundings. The terrorism charge I find to be akin to charging the get-away driver at a bank robbery with parking on a double yellow line whilst his partners in crime are inside robbing the bank.
I guessed that the section 58 charge was trumped-up for a reason.
The police have begged us not to speculate publicly about what is going on in this case before the trial next year, so I won’t offer my own explanations of possible reasons for the puzzling decision to bring the section 58 charge over the US AIr Force paper by a psychiatrist, which quoted the adequately redacted text of an alleged Al Qaeda training manual, missing out all the information about how to commit acts of terrorism that might have been useful to a would-be terrorist.
I have three guesses as to the motivation for the recent tweeking of the official narrative.
To explain one guess, I could use the word “gradually”.
To explain my second guess, I might mention Hegel, and the word “synthesis”, or the phrase “an appeasing compromise with the so-called far right”.
To explain my third guess, I might mention “provocation”.
But, I’ll leave you with only these clues, to inform your own guesses as to what my three guesses might be, explained fully, as to why the official narrative has been adjusted ever-so slightly by the CPS decision to charge Rudakubana under section 58, to the delight of those who assumed from day one that the murders were acts of Islamist terrorism.
Rather I think it’s best to wait until we find out the truth at the trial of Rudakubana, at which the Crown might not offer compelling enough evidence to support the flimsy terrorism charge, leading to an acquittal that will tell us that the murders were definitely not officially terrorist crimes either.
I hope you manage to cover the trial when it happens. That will probably be a very interesting report.