Cameron ‘Hypocrite’ Over Church Schools

A leading Christian lobby group has accused Conservative leader David Cameron of hypocrisy over his support for Church Schools and Christian charities.

In a video posted on YouTube by the Conservative Christian Fellowship, which exists to promote the Conservative Party amongst the faithful, Cameron says he is ‘amazed’ at just how much Church is doing in social work. ‘Wherever there is a need you are there,’ he gushes. Christians are ‘caring for the vulnerable, helping to build a strong society.’ The Church’s values, according to Cameron, lie at the heart of the Britain he wants to see. He wants a thriving voluntary sector and to give charities stability, treating faith-based charities well. ‘I want them to go on doing what they do,’ says Cameron.

This is the same David Cameron who voted for the Sexual Orientation Regulations in 2007, which disrupted church-based adoption charities, forcing almost all of them to close rather than place vulnerable children with homosexuals.

Cameron goes on to laud faith schools. ‘Good schools with high standards of discipline are vital,’ he says. There are some excellent faith schools and we learn he chose one for his daughter. But the same man who says he values their work and wants a new generation of academies told a homosexual audience in an interview for ‘Attitude’ magazine in January that he wants to force faith schools to jettison their values and teach that sodomy is as normal and natural as heterosexuality.

Earlier this month the Conservatives boasted of how many ‘gay’ candidates they would be fielding at the election, including current front-bencher Alan Duncan, who once joked that he would kill someone who defended the Christian view that marriage is between one man and one woman, and members of the Cameron inner circle.

In February, his spokesman Michael Gove told Andrew Marr and millions of BBC radio listeners that he would not tolerate schools which allowed into the classroom the view that the universe was created.

“To my mind you cannot have a school which teaches creationism” he said. “And one thing that we will make absolutely clear is that you can not have schools that are set up which teach people things which are clearly at variance with what we know to be scientific fact.”

Finally, David Cameron says in his video that ‘strong relationships’ are vital for society and that it is wrong that ‘couples are rewarded for splitting up’. He would ‘recognise marriage in the tax system’. Does that mean that the man who voted for Civil Partnerships in 2004 will reward those counterfeits of marriage as well?

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said:

‘David Cameron needs to recognise that Christian social work arises from the Gospel. Our values are Gospel values. We feed the hungry at our Saviour’s command. And the same Saviour is also King of kings. His laws value holiness, chastity, fidelity, honesty and respect for God and man. These values are absent from those of the homosexuals whose vote he is also trying to court.

‘If faith-based schools are not to be allowed to point out the problems with evolutionary theory and the questions it cannot answer, such as how birds evolved nest-building, and how birds survived before they got it right, then is he intending to preside over a totalitarian government that bans scientific debate?

‘And if Christians are to be forced to toe the secularist pro-gay, pro-fornication line in sex education classes, then where does religious freedom lie in the Cameron order of priorities?

‘David Cameron is trying simultaneously to run with the hare of Christianity and hunt with the hounds of secularism. The man who voted on 6th May 2008 to allow wicked men to insult Jesus Christ wants Christians to fall in with his secularist ideas before they receive funding and he wants the failed tenets of secularism to dominate what we can teach. Just like Gordon Brown and Nick Clegg, Cameron will take what he wants from the Christian Church, but trample underfoot our challenging vision of a society which honours God in the Lord Jesus Christ.

‘I hope and pray Christians will see through the hypocrisy of David Cameron and only vote for those Tory candidates who fear the Lord and repudiate the secularist, pro-gay views of their leader.’

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

I Promise Not to Vote Tory, Labour, Libdem, or BNP

Our good friends at Premier Radio are running a campaign ‘My Promise to Vote’. They urge listeners to complete a form to be sent to the Speaker and MPs. It says: ‘I promise to vote in the 2010 General Election using my Christian conscience to decide which party to support’.

The only problem is, by using that formula, voting along party lines, the Christ-centred believer rules out each one of the three main parties. To start with, each of them is fundamentally secularist and pro-gay. Atheist Nick Clegg, David Cameron with his pro-sodomy kitchen cabinet and the anti-family Gordon Brown have gone out of their way in the last three months to court the perverted vote. Clegg and Cameron were interviewed in turn for ‘Attitude’ magazine then Brown hosted a party at No10 for ‘Schools Out’. In the process, all three told decent people not to vote for them or their parties.

Next, each is pro-EU, favouring that bastion of Antichrist which refused to put God into its constitution and is now pressing hard Europe-wide for policies enforcing ‘equality and diversity’. Not one of the three main parties is pro-life, although individual members may be. And each is stupidly pro-Islam, not seeing that Islam is not just Antichrist, denying His divinity, His incarnation and His resurrection, but anti-secularist as well.

 

WHO WOULD JESUS HAVE IN HIS CABINET?

Outside England, Plaid Cymru in Wales are secularist in outlook, although individually many of their AM’s opposed blasphemy in the Welsh Assembly. The Scottish Nationalists have endorsed Islamist Osama Saeed as a candidate for Glasgow Central but are not nearly as pro-sodomy as their rivals. In Northern Ireland, the Ulster Unionists have allied themselves with the Conservatives, which makes them difficult for Christians to vote for. It is fair to say the Democratic Unionist Party, despite its recent problems, returns the highest number of God-fearing MP’s to Westminster of any political party, certainly in proportion to its size.

So what now? ‘Who would Jesus vote for?’ is often asked. ‘Who would the King of kings have in His cabinet?’ is the better question. The qualification is that rulers should be ‘able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness’ as we read in Exodus 18:21. That narrows it down considerably. If Christians were only to vote for men who displayed Exodus 18:21 qualities, men whom their Saviour and King would approve, men who could stand in His holy hill, we should be hard-pressed to find any suitable candidates, fewer still if their party allegiance defines them.

We are not saying there are not some really good, God-fearing Labour and Conservative MP’s and candidates, and even the odd righteous LibDem. But they have to renounce all the secularist immoral baggage of their respective party leaders before they can stand before Christians and ask for our vote.

 

A PARTY CHRISTIANS CAN SUPPORT? ER, NO.

One minor party is actively seeking the Christian vote. The British National Party has a leaflet out showing that all three main parties support the war in Afghanistan, abortion and teaching five-year-olds about homosexuality. It quotes scripture. It says that to support either Labour, the Conservatives or the Liberal Democrats is incompatible with Christianity. It observes we must all stand before the judgment seat of Christ and give an account for our actions.

So far so good. Then it says ‘there is only one political party that Christians can support without betraying the Lord Jesus Christ.’ And which is that sole repository of righteousness? It’s the British National Party, apparently. A covering letter from one Jim Clift even tackles the charge of racism levelled against it. In February this year, ‘the BNP membership voted to allow non-white UK citizens to become members,’ he says. ‘This nailed and buried, once and for all, the lie that today’s BNP members are all racists.’

Well, firstly the BNP changed its rules only in the teeth of a pending injunction from the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Secondly, its members may not ‘all’ be racists, but a large proportion are, right to the top. The party may now be anti-Islam (they have noticed that Muslims are often brown-skinned people) but it has never been Christian and has always been fiercely anti-Israel. Its press officer believes in evolution and that black people are less highly evolved than whites.

Thirdly, Jim Clift is seriously asking Christians to support a party that up until a few weeks ago would not accept half of all Christian worshippers in London as members? Er, no thanks, Jim.

 

SO WHO CAN WE SUPPORT?

The BNP, having said, in the context of Tony Blair’s lies to take us to war in Iraq, ‘Jesus Christ forbad lying (Matt 19:18)’ are themselves economical with the truth. It is not true that ‘there is only one political party that Christians can support without betraying the Lord Jesus Christ,’ as they claim. (That party’s the BNP, if you were wondering.)

UKIP for a start are doing a fairly good job, standing against political correctness, against compulsory sex education and the EU, for example. We are taking a close look at them and their policies and in the meantime we are wishing their candidate Nigel Farage well as he tries to unseat the widely disliked John Bercow in Buckingham. (For that matter, who isn’t?)

The Christian People’s Alliance are a national party and it is eminently possible to support them in good conscience in the seats they are contesting. The English Democrats too are worth a second look.

Finally, the Christian Party is gearing up to fight 120 seats nationwide, including the Western Isles, Barking and Dagenham. In Barking its leader George Hargreaves goes head to head with the BNP’s Nick Griffin trying to unseat the minister for child abuse, Labour’s pro-abortion, pro-gay, pro-blasphemy, anti-Christian Margaret Hodge. They are a party Christians can support as they honour the Lord Jesus Christ as King of kings.

Let us pray that the Lord raises up candidates for Christians to vote for in good conscience. Voting for the wicked only encourages them. Give us someone to vote for – then we’ll promise to vote!

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Tories Boast About Their Gay Candidates

The Conservative Party has published a list of its homosexual candidates standing for election this year. The Tories have 20 ‘out’ gay candidates, with 11 happy to be named.

The party has three professing homosexual MPs – Nick Herbert, Alan Duncan and Greg Barker – with a further 5 of the 11 likely to be elected.

One of the 11 is a woman. Millionairess Margot James is standing for Stourbridge, and is a prominent advisor to David Cameron. She would form a ‘sisterhood’ with Labour’s pensions minister Angela Eagle, currently the only lesbian in the House of Commons. Candidate Nick Boles is also a member of Cameron’s inner circle.

 

MANY STANDING FOR WINNABLE SEATS

According to the homosexual news site Pink News, ‘gay political commentator Iain Dale has speculated that the Conservatives have between 20 and 30 out gay candidates, with many standing for winnable seats.’

The Times estimated that if the Tories win a majority of ten, they will have slightly more ‘out’ gay MPs than Labour currently has. The shock for Christian voters is that the Conservatives are actually proud of having people standing who define themselves by their sexual perversion.

In response to criticisms of his recent pro-gay statements in ‘Attitude’ magazine,’David Cameron’s Correspondence Unit’ is now boasting that the Party has ‘three openly gay members’ of its front bench and that ‘David has made clear that he is proud that the Party fully supported civil partnerships.’ Last year Cameron apologised for his party’s introduction of Section 28, which banned the promotion of sodomy in the classroom, and this year he echoed Nick Clegg by calling for faith schools to be forced to teach that homosexuality is natural and harmless. Cameron then went further and announced he would offer political asylum to African homosexuals.

THE ELEVEN CANDIDATES
Already MP’s:

  • Greg Barker, Bexhill and Battle
  • Alan Duncan, Rutland and Melton
  • Nick Herbert, Arundel and South Downs
  • In winnable seats:
  • Margot James, 52, Stourbridge
  • David Gold, 37, Eltham
  • Nick Boles, 44, Grantham
  • Iain Stewart, 27, Milton Keynes South
  • Mark Coote, 49, Cheltenham

Less likely to win:

  • Nick King, 44, Mid Dorset and North Poole
  • Matthew Sephton, 34, Salford and Eccles
  • Simon Nayyar, 42, Hackney South and Shoreditch

Not listed:

  • Mike Freer, standing for Finchley & Golders Green

Being mentioned as potential candidates: Previous Falmouth candidate Ashley Crossley, blogger Iain Dale, actor Adam Rickitt, and Tory Central Office hack Dan Ritterband.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

The Rotten Legacy of John Maynard Keynes

Alistair Darling, British Chancellor of the Exchequer, has decided to follow a Keynesian approach for getting Britain out of its financial recession.
Alistair Darling, British Chancellor of the Exchequer, has decided to follow a Keynesian approach for getting Britain out of its financial recession.

British Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alistair Darling, has decided to follow a Keynesian approach for getting Britain out of its financial recession.

The words of Richard Nixon in 1971 are an apt description of Labour’s present approach: ‘We are all Keynesians now.’

But who was economist John Maynard Keynes and why have his views exercised such a lasting impact on Western thinking?

This post attempts to answer that question by exploring some of the lesser known facts from the life of Britain’s most influential economist.

The British economist John Maynard Keynes (1883 –1946) is known for laying the groundwork of modern economic policy. What few people realize is that his economic theories grew out of his rejection of Christianity and were bound up with the same principles governing his homosexual lifestyle.

Interventionist Approach

Known as the father of liberal economics, Keynes advocated an interventionist approach to economic policy, which urged governments to use fiscal measures to militate against the adverse effects of economic recessions, depressions and booms. He opposed the gold standard because it acted as a break on government’s capacity to control the money supply.

This interventionist model led to a paradigm shift in people’s view of government and “provided the intellectual rationale for the transformation of the State from primarily an administrator of law and order (as the Bible teaches) into an economic manager with broad, open-ended powers.” (Ken Ewert, from his article ‘In The Long Run We Are (Not) All Dead: The Anti-Christian Economics of John Maynard Keynes)

A centrepiece of Keynesian economics is that lack of private spending during hard times is compensated for by increased government spending during hard times. In keeping with what biographer Robert Skidelsky calls Keynes’ “lifelong bias against long-run thinking”, Keynes argued that when the national economy is faced with a financial recession, the government must spend its way out of the difficulties. In practice, this means Government putting forward billions of pounds on construction projects, schools, social housing and hospitals. If such projects must be financed by debt, then so be it. The theory was that supply would create demand and stimulate consumption, rather than the other way round, as classical economics maintained. This might actually have worked if it weren’t for the fact that Keynes’ advice about lack of spending during good times was never embraced with the same enthusiasm. (See Melanie Phillips’ article “Saviour or Destoryer“)

Keynes urged citizens to trust that government knew best and could manage society’s money better than the people could. However, Keynes was astute enough to recognize that governments were intrinsically untrustworthy. He attempted to overcome this dilemma by arguing that England and America should work in concert since neither one could be trusted on their own (as if one leaky bucket plus another leaky bucket equals a bucket that can hold water.)

Despite the flaws in his theory, Keynes’ General Theory of Unemployment, Interest and Money helped to convert many influential people, including those within the ecclesiastical establishment, to Labour Party socialism (what Keynes himself called “semi-socialism”.)

As one writer put it,

“The politicians loved him: he was giving academic reasons for budget deficits, price controls, and monetary inflation. The younger economists loved him, for his ideas were creating lifetime employment opportunities for them as government economic planners.

“It was Keynes, more than any man in the twentieth century, who is intellectually responsible for today’s looming bank crisis, the huge government deficits, and the eventual default of governments on their financial obligations. He gave the Western economy a large does of intellectual AIDS.”

Rejection of Christianity

 

John Maynard Keynes
John Maynard Keynes

Keynes (pictured left) rightly recognized the central role that worldviews play in economic thinking. For example, in an essay he wrote in 1926, titled ‘The End of Laissez-faire,’ he criticized the Christian idea, advocated in a pamphlet written by Archbishop Whately and published by the SPCK, that true liberty “is that every man should be left free to dispose of his own property, his own time, and strength, and skill, in whatever way he himself may think fit, provided he does no wrong to his neighbours…” Keynes asserted, on the other hand, that “It is not true that individuals possess a prescriptive ‘natural liberty’ in their economic activities….The battle of Socialism against unlimited private profit is being won in detail hour by hour.”

 

Because he rejected the Christian worldview, he also rejected the free market. This was accompanied with an almost paranoiac frenzy against thrift, which he pejoratively referred to as the “hoarding instinct.” The General Theory shows an understanding that the ‘virtue’ of saving is rooted in the Christian worldview. As he wrote: “The morals, the politics, the literature, and the religion of the age [are] joined in a grand conspiracy for the promotion of saving.” Elsewhere he argued that the “hoarding instinct” was one of the trinity of evils which also included the family and concern for the future.

Keynes recognized that the principle behind saving – deferred gratification of immediate desires – indicated a future orientation which pointed beyond oneself. He scornfully dismissed such ‘purposiveness’ with his oft-quoted words, “in the long run we are all dead.” Ken Ewert put it best when he wrote that

“The effects of the ‘short-run’ and ‘childless’ philosophy of Mr. Keynes are clear: nearly all western governments have followed the Keynesian prescription of spending and consumption, and have run large annual budget deficits for decades.”

Homosexual Lifestyle

Keynes’ rejection of the Biblical “sowing and reaping principle” in favour of immediate gratification was not limited to his economic theories, but formed the centrepiece of his deviant sexual lifestyle. Keynes was the chief homosexual protagonist of the Bloomsbury group, which has been described as a “sexual merry-go-round” by biographer Robert Skidelsky.

Arguing that homosexuality was the supreme state of existence, Keynes saw no problem indulging his obsession for little boys. In letters to his homosexual friends, Keynes urged them to go to Tunis, “where bed and boy were also not expensive”, while he himself ranged throughout the Mediterranean area searching out suitable boys for himself and his friends. He was particularly delighted to discover that the poverty and ignorance of North Africa, the Middle East, and Italy allowed him to use English shillings to purchase the bodies of children.

Keynes’ short-term philosophy of life held no place for abstinence, whether financial or sexual. He campaigned to legalize homosexuality as well as drugs and believed that a restructuring of economics was central to that process. As he put it in one of his oft-quoted remarks, “When the accumulation of wealth is no longer of high social importance, there will be great changes in the code of morals. We shall be able to rid ourselves of many pseudo-moral principles which have hag-ridden us for two hundred years….”

Defense of Eugenics

Keynes was also a strong supporter of eugenics, a point overlooked by his contemporary devotees. He declared that eugenics was “the most important, significant and, I would add, genuine branch of sociology which exists.”
He was the treasurer of the Cambridge University Eugenics Society during its early years and served on the British Eugenics Society’s board of directors in 1945.

It Wasn’t All Bad

Despite his problems, Keynes early works are scattered with some amazing economic insights. For example, his book The Economic Consequences of the Peace, opens with the following words:

“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, government can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. – As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery. Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”

Keynes asked us to imagine a government that increases the stock of money from nine million to twelve millions currency notes without other conditions being changed. “In taking this step,” writes Herbert Schlossberg summarizing Keynes’ position, “it has transferred from the public to itself an amount of resources equal to three million currency notes ‘just as successfully as if it had raised this sum in taxation.’ Who paid the inflation tax? Those who hold the original nine millions notes, because each of those notes will purchase 25 percent less than before the inflation. The inflation of currency means its depreciation in value. ‘The burden of the tax is well spread, cannot be evaded, costs nothing to collect, and falls, in a rough sort of way, in proportion to the wealth of the victim.’

Understanding that the money-printing policy he came to favour would eventually lead to economic collapse, Keynes struggled mightily to devise a way to prevent it. He settled finally on a capital levy, whereby the state despoils the creditor and confiscates part of its debt held by the citizens. Seizing the money directly by repudiating the debt seemed better than depreciating the purchasing power through inflation.

Click HERE for a video explaining what is wrong with Keynesian Economics.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Obama: Put Not Your Trust in Princes

The election of the first black President of the United States has seen British politicians all tugging at his coat claiming to be his best mate. Gordon Brown said Obama was a “serious man for serious times” and embodied “progressive” values shared by Labour.

David Cameron said: “In electing Barack Obama, America has made history and proved to the world that it is a nation eager for change.” Indeed, ‘change’ was the buzz-word of the Obama campaign. “In these difficult times people everywhere are crying out for change,” Mr Cameron, who also advocates ‘change’, went on. Change from what to what? That is not the point. ‘Change’ is the point.

Nick Clegg found in Obama another convert to the cause of cutting taxes ‘for those on low and middle incomes’ and environmentalism. “Climate change, the global economy, and threats to our collective security now demand a radical new approach by Barack Obama, leaving the Bush era firmly behind. The world will not succeed in this era of globalisation without the leadership of the new American president”, he said.

Interestingly, George Soros, the globalist billionaire banker who made his fortune gambling in the hedge funds of the money markets, heavily supported Obama’s campaign. Soros is anti-Israel despite his Jewish ancestry, and was bizarrely involved in the confiscation of Jewish property during the Nazi occupation of Hungary. He famously broke the Bank of England on Black Wednesday in 1992, making an estimated £1.1 billion in the process. His record in the former Soviet Union shows that even his apparent altruism is designed to make him money. Soros does not give away money to get no return.

Despite the adulation, even amongst some well-meaning Christians, a UK Christian group says the election of Obama is nothing to celebrate.

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today:

‘Too many people are swooning over Obama because he is the first African-American president and they think that means he must understand the plight of the less fortunate.

‘But his attitude to the vulnerable may be gauged by his passionate support for abortion, even partial-birth abortion, where a baby is killed at the very moment it is delivered. It gets worse. Obama single-handedly wrecked the Illinois version of the Born Alive Act, which grants medical treatment to babies mistakenly born alive after abortion. Ignoring them, allowing them to die, which Obama supports, has been described by even the most hardened pro-abortion advocates as ‘crossing the line between abortion and infanticide.’

‘Unless he has a massive God-inspired change of heart, Obama will switch funding from chastity-based projects to sex education models like ours which promote promiscuity, poor money into pro-abortion bodies such as UNFPA and IPPF, and if there is more he can do to promote the death-culture of abortion and gay rights, he will find it. With anti-Christian Democrats now firmly in control of both houses, he should meet no opposition. Barring a miracle of repentance, it is ironic that a man with Kenyan parentage will bring shame on his roots by allying himself with the eugenicists who think there are too many black people in Africa and attempting to impose the cultural imperialism of population control.

‘Even the hope of bringing the troops home will not now materialise. It seems Obama will only end the occupation of Iraq to deploy those forces in the blood-bath of Afghanistan . And that is all about building an oil-pipeline.

‘To be even-handed, McCain was pro-war and would not have been staunchly pro-life. On other issues, he was so much of a Washington insider that conservatives and Evangelical Christians appear to have been reluctant to vote for him. The best that can be said is that he would have been slightly better at resisting the forces of evil than Obama. McCain’s defeat shows a luke-warm Republican candidate will never be elected.

‘A man who regards the birth of a child as a punishment and thinks the Sermon on the Mount mandates same-sex unions is not a man who knows the mind of God. I believe an-repentant Obama will draw the USA further into its covenant with death and it will take a miracle from the Lord to annul it. The only bright light is, God is working His purpose out, He is a God of miracles and He knows what He is doing.

‘In practical terms, Christians need to be praying for this man to come to his senses like the prodigal son, turn to the Father and choose life. In the meantime, let us forget all the adulation and hope based on Obama’s colour and parentage. God does not do race and colour, He does obedience to His word. And His word also warns against judging people by appearances. On the subject of leaders, it specifically says: “Choose able men, such as fear God, men of truth,” (Exod 18:21) “Put not your trust in princes … in whom is no help” warns Psalm 146:3. “It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in princes”, says Psalm 118:9. The Lord Jesus says: “Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment” (John 7:24).

‘If Obama does not repent, and if God takes against him as a result, things he tries to do in every area, including economics, are doomed to fail. Then, with the global economic down-turn mutating into recession, the Republicans may yet find this was a good election for them to lose. Assuming they adopt a God-fearing candidate next time round, of course.’

Rivers of Blood – 70 Years on

Just 40 years ago, on 22nd April 1968, the late Enoch Powell MP told a meeting in his Wolverhampton constituency that Britain ‘must be mad’ to allow 50,000 dependents of Commonwealth immigrants to settle every year in Britain .  He said enacting legislation like the Race Relations Bill was ‘to risk throwing a match onto gunpowder’ and described Britain as a nation ‘busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre’.

Mr Powell quoted a constituent who said that ‘in fifteen or twenty years’ time, the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.’  In a speech replete with Biblical and Classical imagery and quotation, Mr Powell warned that there would be forces working against integration which would begin as ‘a cloud no bigger than a man’s hand’ that ‘can so rapidly overcast the sky’.  ‘As I look ahead,’ said Mr Powell, ‘ I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see the River Tiber foaming with much blood.’

Enoch Powell was dismissed from the Shadow Cabinet and became a political pariah.  The race relations industry which he was so afraid would exacerbate the problems he saw grew into a Behemoth granting money in patronising fashion to favoured projects of its subservient immigrant client groups.  The same philosophy exists today.  The Government’s only answer to Muslim extremism is to hurl cash at it in the belief the money indeed answereth all things.

The so-called race riots  of the 1980s, in Bristol , Toxteth, Brixton and Birmingham seemed to prove that ‘Enoch was right’.  But they came and went and the West Indian population, although still over-represented in certain areas, has greatly assimilated.  Whether race relations money helped or hindered might depend on one’s point of view.

African Christians also quickly became part of the indigenous culture, enriching it as they came.  Amongst the Asians, Sikhs appear to have mixed in, even as they try to keep their culture intact, whereas middle-caste Hindus have simply got on with what they do best, which is opening shops and making money.  Christians from Asia, like those from the Caribbean and Africa , have brought nothing but good to these shores, and many tell how let down they feel by what they thought was the Christian country they were coming to.

Which leaves the Muslims.  Even the mention of Islam shows how wrong Enoch Powell was to see the problem as one of colour.  He should have known better, but like many of his time he was a religious Christian but a cultural atheist.  Parliament had only the year before he spoke passed the Abortion Act and the Sexual Offences Act.  Innocent human life had been further devalued by the abolition of the death penalty just two years earlier.  The Theatres Act would abolish censorship in the year Mr Powell was speaking, whilst the Divorce Reform Act would blow away the Christian legal basis to marriage the year after.  Even while he was speaking of a nation heaping up its own funeral pyre, secularists in government and the civil service were, like the Mole Man of Hackney, just as busily undermining its very foundations.  The problem then, as now, was never black, largely Christian, faces walking about the streets, it was already white atheist backsides sitting in the corridors of power.

But even if Enoch Powell had been as far-sighted as the Christian campaigners who were to initiate the 1970s Festival of Light, he would never have seen the rise of militant Islam.  The seeds were already there in the Muslim Brotherhood, but it was only 9-11 which thrust the activities of Brotherhood derivative Al-Quaeda into the limelight.  Nevertheless, the Festival of Light, to whose legacy Christian Voice must aspire to succeed, knew that it would be the abandoning of our Christian heritage, rather than black immigration, which would lead to the destruction of Britain .

Today, as then, it is not against flesh and blood which Christians wrestle, but against spiritual wickedness in high places.  The wickedness being enacted, anti-life embryology, the destruction of our Christian constitution and so on, shows secularism to be a jealous devouring god which allows no dissent.  Yet even now, Islam is loitering in the wings of the political stage, and secularists have no answer except to use the old race relations model of hurling money in the hope of appeasing it.

But it will not work.  Islam, like fire, will never say ‘enough’.  Unless Christianity is re- asserted as the faith of this realm, and quickly, Muslims will try to substitute Islam as the faith of these Islands .  Secularism is powerless to resist Islam.  Secularist politicians, as we have so clearly seen in the establishment response to Islamic terrorism, don’t have a clue what they are dealing with.  Secularism also leaves a spiritual vacuum at the heart of government and nature, as we know, hates a vacuum.

If present birth-rates amongst Muslims continue, and there is no sign of Muslims becoming secularised to the extent that they adopt the anti-child contraceptive mentality of the rest of us, then they will be in a majority within 40 years.  But the experience of Tower Hamlets shows that the vacuum could easily be filled ten years before that.  Even at 30% of the population, Muslims will want power and they will get ‘the whip hand’ as Mr Powell’s constituent put it, over black, brown and white alike.  Then, if they gain a majority in Parliament, they will want to impose Sharia.

At that point, which I suggest could be in thirty years’ time, the majority may well decide to defend their desire not to live under Islam by force of arms.  Whose side the Police and Armed Forces will be on in such a conflict is anyone’s guess.  The European Union will be powerless to come to the rescue, even if it is still in existence that far in the future.  Germany will be facing the same Islamic problem.

It could of course be that the EU will already have blown apart with or without bloodshed.  Eastern European immigration is now leading to pressures on British health facilities, housing, schooling and benefits, whilst rival gangs from the Baltic to the Balkans are stretching police resources beyond the limit.  Enoch Powell never foresaw that ingredient in the mix.  But if one country, Britain perhaps, were to call time, secede and take back its natural resources, which in our case would most visibly mean our fishing grounds, there could be retaliatory EU naval action which could easily escalate into full-scale war.

So either from the EU or from Islam there is trouble looming.  It could easily become external war or that most bestial of monsters, civil war.  We must pray for national repentance, because only God in Jesus Christ can save us, and He will only do so if we turn to Him in our despair and cry out of the darkness for His mercy.  Christians must take courage and confidence in the Gospel and in the rule of Christ and pray and work for His Kingdom, in earth as in heaven.  God has not forgotten mercy, but time is running out.  None of us wants to say, 30 years hence, 70 years after his Wolverhampton speech, that in a peculiar sort of way, Enoch was right.

Join Christian Voice

Christian Voice is a prophetic ministry in the ‘forthtelling’ sense for those Christians who are fed up with the way things are, have had enough of secularist politicians imposing wickedness on the rest of us and who are not satisfied with trying to get ‘Christian influence in a secular world’ because they know ‘The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof; the world and they that dwell therein’ (Psalm 24:1). If you want instead to lift high the Crown Rights of the King of kings, you have found the right place!

Membership Application

  • Yes, I/we wish to join Christian Voice. (Husband and wife may join as one)
  • I/we unreservedly support the aims of Christian Voice and agree with the Statement of Faith.
  • Please send me my free copy of Britain in Sin, which lifts the lid on the unrighteous legislation of the past fifity years and its devastating social consequences, my free copy of Understanding Islam, which will tell me all I need to know about Islam, my free copy of Labelling Halal, which exposes the secret sale of Islamic meat, and the latest Christian Voice newsletter, full of confidential prayer targets, which never goes up on the web.
  • I/we agree to computer storage of all information provided, solely for the use of Christian Voice.

Aims of Christian Voice

  • To uphold Christianity as the Faith of the United Kingdom.
  • To be a voice for Biblical values in law and public policy.
  • To defend and support traditional family life.
  • At all times to rely humbly on the blessing of Almighty God.

Statement of Faith

  1. We believe in one creator God, eternally existent in three persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as stated in the historic creeds of the Christian church.
  2. We acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord over all creation.
  3. We believe the Holy Bible to be the inspired, infallible, written Word of God to whose precepts, given for the good of nations and individuals, all man’s laws must submit.
  4. We believe all government to be under the authority of God and that its purpose is the maintenance of freedom and justice solely in accordance with Biblical principles.

Cost of annual membership is £20.00

If you agree with the Aims & Statement of Faith then click the button below.

If you wish to renew your membership please click the button below. We will match your details to our records.

Princes’ Stag Night Binge Drink Disgrace

RAF bosses have been criticised for allowing Prince William to show off to his girlfriend Kate Middleton by landing a helicopter on her parent’s land. They have defended the stunt as a ‘training exercise’.

But it was the culmination of a previous helicopter jaunt that has seen Princes William and Harry criticised for setting an example of binge drinking just as one of the latest casualties has spoken out.

Last week the newspapers reported on the ‘stag night’ of Peter Phillips, tenth in line to the throne, in a public house on the Isle of Wight . Prince William, second in line, used a training run in an RAF helicopter to reach the event, picking up his brother in London on the way.

According to reports, the second in line to the throne downed ‘pint after pint’ and dropped his trousers to flash his boxer shorts during a drinking game in the Anchor pub in Cowes .

Meanwhile, Prince Harry spent much of the evening taking a funnel filled with beer around the pub, encouraging the bemused locals to drink it straight down their throats.

At one point, Prince Harry got into a drunken panic that Phillips was missing, and resorted to a foul-mouthed tirade across the packed house, yelling: “Where the f*** is the stag? We’ve lost the f****** stag.” Phillips, 29, was later found slumped in a shop doorway.

Many comments on newspaper websites from the public were astonishingly congratulatory, with people saying the princes’ drinking frenzy made them ‘proud to be British’.

However, one paper, the Daily Mail, carried on the very same day a report headed ‘The binge drinking girl who suffered liver failure at just 14’. Natasha Farnham started drinking heavily at the age of 12. Just two years later she had liver failure. She was drinking wine and alcopops, using her dinner money and cash stolen from her mother to buy it. She now has memory loss and is warning other youngsters of the dangers of binge-drinking.

The Mail, seemingly oblivious to the irony of carrying the story of the royal binge in the same edition, said, ‘Her descent into a life of ruined health and petty crime illustrates the perils of cheap alcohol and the culture of binge-drinking that grips Britain .’

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today:

‘This isn’t the first time the papers have carried reports of royal drunkenness. We talk of “noblesse oblige”, the responsibility of those in the public eye to behave better than the rest of us and thereby to set a wholesome example. Of course with their fornicating and drinking, the royal princes are not the only people in public life dragging the rest of us down. Most newspapers have a page in which the drunkenness of self-destructing celebrities is reported day after depressing day.

‘It is scarcely deniable that the cult of celebrity influences young people into thinking that getting drunk is a cool thing to do. Given that the Continent has nothing like our problems of drunkenness, blaming it on cheap drink and the supermarkets is too simplistic. The fact is, there is a death wish in our culture, and the Princes are not just part of that, but driving it. Before a Government minister rails against binge-drinking again, the Prime Minister ought to mention it in his weekly audience with the grandmother of two of the worst culprits.’

READ: Neh 9:34; Job 12:21; Psalm 118:9; Prov 31:3-5; Isa 34:12; Jer 51:57; Mark 10:23-24; Luke 8:14; Gal 5:19-23; Titus 2:6-8.

Join Christian Voice

Christian Voice is a prophetic ministry in the ‘forthtelling’ sense for those Christians who are fed up with the way things are, have had enough of secularist politicians imposing wickedness on the rest of us and who are not satisfied with trying to get ‘Christian influence in a secular world’ because they know ‘The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof; the world and they that dwell therein’ (Psalm 24:1). If you want instead to lift high the Crown Rights of the King of kings, you have found the right place!

Membership Application

  • Yes, I/we wish to join Christian Voice. (Husband and wife may join as one)
  • I/we unreservedly support the aims of Christian Voice and agree with the Statement of Faith.
  • Please send me my free copy of Britain in Sin, which lifts the lid on the unrighteous legislation of the past fifity years and its devastating social consequences, my free copy of Understanding Islam, which will tell me all I need to know about Islam, my free copy of Labelling Halal, which exposes the secret sale of Islamic meat, and the latest Christian Voice newsletter, full of confidential prayer targets, which never goes up on the web.
  • I/we agree to computer storage of all information provided, solely for the use of Christian Voice.

Aims of Christian Voice

  • To uphold Christianity as the Faith of the United Kingdom.
  • To be a voice for Biblical values in law and public policy.
  • To defend and support traditional family life.
  • At all times to rely humbly on the blessing of Almighty God.

Statement of Faith

  1. We believe in one creator God, eternally existent in three persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as stated in the historic creeds of the Christian church.
  2. We acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord over all creation.
  3. We believe the Holy Bible to be the inspired, infallible, written Word of God to whose precepts, given for the good of nations and individuals, all man’s laws must submit.
  4. We believe all government to be under the authority of God and that its purpose is the maintenance of freedom and justice solely in accordance with Biblical principles.

Cost of annual membership is £20.00

If you agree with the Aims & Statement of Faith then click the button below.

If you wish to renew your membership please click the button below. We will match your details to our records.

Disestablishment Motion Has Mark of the Beast!

No, you couldn’t make this one up.  Seriously.  While the blasphemy debate was on in the House of Commons last night, and just as we were thinking that once the blasphemy law is abolished they would be calling for disestablishment of the Church of England as the next step along the road to an anti-Christian Britain, well, three MP’s were putting down an Early Day Motion (it has no chance of being debated, it’s just flying a kite) calling, er, for the Church of England to be disestablished.

Dozens of these motions get put down in a day on all sorts of issues.  The clerks just allocated it the next number in the list.  In a masterly twist, that number was 666, symbol of the Antichrist. Click here to see the motion on the Parliament website.

“This number is supposed to be the mark of the Devil. It looks as though God or the Devil have been moving in mysterious ways,” said Bob Russell, a LibDem MP among those proposing the motion.  “What is even stranger is that this motion was tabled last night when MPs were debating blasphemy,” he added.

The motion says “That this House calls for the disestablishment of the Church of England” which would mean an end to the formal link between Church and State in England — embodied in the monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, who is both head of state and head of the Church of England and the presence of bishops sitting in the House of Lords.

The number 666 is referred to in the Book of Revelation: “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred, three score and six.” (Rev 13:18)

“It is incredible that a motion like this should have, by chance, acquired this significant number,” said Russell.

By chance?  Hmm.  The Lord Almighty is trying to tell those stupid, proud, arrogant, fallible Members of Parliament something about the holiness of His name, or about His sovereignty over this United Kingdom, or about His ability to intervene in the affairs of men.  But will they listen?

Join Christian Voice

Christian Voice is a prophetic ministry in the ‘forthtelling’ sense for those Christians who are fed up with the way things are, have had enough of secularist politicians imposing wickedness on the rest of us and who are not satisfied with trying to get ‘Christian influence in a secular world’ because they know ‘The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof; the world and they that dwell therein’ (Psalm 24:1). If you want instead to lift high the Crown Rights of the King of kings, you have found the right place!

Membership Application

  • Yes, I/we wish to join Christian Voice. (Husband and wife may join as one)
  • I/we unreservedly support the aims of Christian Voice and agree with the Statement of Faith.
  • Please send me my free copy of Britain in Sin, which lifts the lid on the unrighteous legislation of the past fifity years and its devastating social consequences, my free copy of Understanding Islam, which will tell me all I need to know about Islam, my free copy of Labelling Halal, which exposes the secret sale of Islamic meat, and the latest Christian Voice newsletter, full of confidential prayer targets, which never goes up on the web.
  • I/we agree to computer storage of all information provided, solely for the use of Christian Voice.

Aims of Christian Voice

  • To uphold Christianity as the Faith of the United Kingdom.
  • To be a voice for Biblical values in law and public policy.
  • To defend and support traditional family life.
  • At all times to rely humbly on the blessing of Almighty God.

Statement of Faith

  1. We believe in one creator God, eternally existent in three persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as stated in the historic creeds of the Christian church.
  2. We acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord over all creation.
  3. We believe the Holy Bible to be the inspired, infallible, written Word of God to whose precepts, given for the good of nations and individuals, all man’s laws must submit.
  4. We believe all government to be under the authority of God and that its purpose is the maintenance of freedom and justice solely in accordance with Biblical principles.

Cost of annual membership is £20.00

If you agree with the Aims & Statement of Faith then click the button below.

If you wish to renew your membership please click the button below. We will match your details to our records.

Conservatives Promise Diwali Bank-Holiday

David Cameron’s Conservatives, as they styled themselves in the Ealing Southall by-election, have made bank holidays for non-Christian religious festivals part of their policy platform, Christian Voice has learned.

The promise, to give Asian religious holidays the same status as Christmas, was broadcast over loudhailers from cars working the West London constituency on election day last week.

The desperate attempt to win votes was only broadcast in Asian vernacular languages, but it backfired as voters pushed Cameron’s hand-picked candidate into third place.

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today: ‘This just illustrates David Cameron at his opportunistic, dishonest and patronising worst. Firstly, in this majority-Asian constituency, he suddenly thought there was political money in promising to elevate Eid, Diwali and Guru Nanak’s birthday to the same status as Christmas. Secondly, he attempted to cover his tracks by only putting the policy out in Punjabi, Urdu and Hindi. Thirdly, he reckoned that Asian voters were so stupid that this sop would make his party seem electable to them.

‘In reality, apart from those Muslims who long for Britain to be an Islamic state, most Asian voters want to see Britain assert its Christian heritage. They feel betrayed by secularism and they don’t want to be part of an aimless, multi-religious swamp.  They also respect people who have principles and stick to them. This bizarre policy initiative just confirms that under David Cameron there is nothing of our heritage the Conservatives value enough to want to conserve.

‘Coming so soon after the marriage tax-break debacle, when financial incentives for marriage were proposed by Iain Duncan-Smith’s think tank only for Cameron to say they would also be offered to homosexual couples, it is no wonder that the fiercely family-minded Asian communities were less than impressed by “David Cameron’s Conservatives”.’

Rev George Hargreaves, leader of the Christian Party, whose candidate in Southall nearly beat UKIP, said: ‘To elevate Eid or Diwali to the same status as Christmas would not only undermine Christianity in Britain ; it would totally destroy British culture. To not even use English to convey this policy is nothing less than treacherous.’

Labour Figures’ Bizarre Link to Paedophile Groups

Their involvement with an organisation to which two groups campaigning for the legalisation of paedophilia were affiliated has come back to challenge three leading Labour Party figures.

Before she became an MP, Harriet Harman was the legal officer in the late 1970s for the National Council for Civil Liberties. When Miss Harman joined NCCL in 1978, PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange, had already been affiliated for three years. Another group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, a Gay Liberation Front offshoot, had also been affiliated to NCCL until it was absorbed by PIE. PIE, which campaigned for adults to have sex legally with children, only broke off its relationship with NCCL when it went undercover in 1982, the same year that Harriet Harman left her NCCL post to become Member of Parliament for Peckham.

NCCL people were earlier involved in keeping the name of an NCCL council-member, Jonathan Walters, out of the People newspaper when it ran an exposé of Paedophile Action for Liberation, of which he was secretary, in 1975. The People still ran the story, but Walters was not named.

Even more extraordinary is the fact that a current Cabinet Minister was running the National Council of Civil Liberties at the time all this was going on.

The Rt Hon Patricia Hewitt MP, Secretary of State for Health, became General Secretary of NCCL in 1974. The very next year, 1975, NCCL invited the Paedophile Information Exchange and Paedophile Action for Liberation to affiliate. In the year after, 1976, the now-notorious paedophile Tom O’Carroll was invited to address the NCCL conference, which promptly voted to ‘deplore’ the use of chemical castration treatments for paedophiles.

Also in 1975, Patricia Hewitt joined the Campaign for Homosexual Equality, as a ‘straight’, in the same year that Keith Hose of the Paedophile Information Exchange addressed its second annual conference. Hose moved a motion of censure on the conference organising committee for ‘relegating paedophilia to ancillary status in conference.’ The motion was seconded by Trevor Locke, who just happened to be a member of the Executive Council of the NCCL. ‘An awareness and acceptance of the sexuality of children is an essential part of the liberation of the young homosexual,’ the motion went on. It was duly passed.

Jack Dromey, whom Harriet Harman married in 1982, and who is now Treasurer of the Labour Party, was also involved with the NCCL. He served on its Executive Committee from 1970 to 1979, so he was there when the decision to invite the two paedophile groups to affiliate was made. NCCL also set up a gay rights sub-committee at the same time, members of which included prominent paedophiles Peter Bremner (alias Roger Nash), Michael Burbidge, Keith Hose and Tom O’Carroll. And of course Walters and Locke were on the Executive.

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, commented:

‘It is timely that the ghosts of the 1970’s past should come back to haunt these three leading Labour Party politicians. Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt were in their mid- or late-twenties at the time, but that cannot really excuse the way NCCL came to regard paedophiles as an oppressed minority whose civil liberties needed to be fought for.

‘All three of them really need to explain why they were so friendly toward so many out campaigning homosexual paedophiles in their youth. Why did they allow the NCCL gay rights sub-committee to be stuffed with them? Why were they happy to work with paedophilia supporters on the NCCL Executive? It cannot have been sympathy with child-molestation, so was it a complete lack of judgment or was it moral cowardice?

‘NCCL has now been rebranded as ‘Liberty’ and is doing great work standing up to the Government to defend the civil liberties of us all. But thirty years ago some rather peculiar things went on, and I think we should be told why.’

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

BNP says anti-evolution Christian Voice is ‘daft’

Christian Voice has incurred the ire of the British National Party after exposing the BNP’s secularism, Darwinism, paganism and racism on its website.

An intemperate email sent on ‘Wednesday 5th April 2006 by one Dr Phil Edwards, Press Officer of the BNP, accused Christian Voice of ‘un Christian (sic) hatred’ and ‘supreme ignorance’ of both ‘BNP policy’ and ‘science based genetic evolutionary theory’.

When challenged on the latter point, Dr Edwards responded yesterday that the BNP’s position ‘that white people are more highly evolved than blacks’ is ‘a conclusion derived over 100 years of medical and scientific research.’  He asked for evidence that black people ‘are as evolved as us’.

Nailing the BNP’s colours even firmer to the secularist mast, Dr Edwards (whose real name according to a number of websites is Stuart Russell) told Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice: ‘If you don’t believe in Darwinian evolution then you are even dafter than you appear.’

Stephen Green said today:  ‘Now we know for certain both that the BNP is inherently racist and that its racism is based firmly on anti-Christian Darwinian evolutionary theory.  The Bible is intellectually coherent throughout in saying firstly that we are all descended from common ancestors – Adam and Eve – (Gen 1:27-28) and then that the human race is “of one blood” (Acts 17:26) and one “whole family” (Eph 3:15).  It is that understanding which drove the evangelical Christian, William Wilberforce, to campaign unceasingly for the abolition of slavery.  We are due to celebrate the bi-centenary of his triumph, the abolition of the slave trade, on 25th March next year.

‘The BNP too is intellectually coherent.  If you accept Darwin’s theory, then it follows that different parts of the human race (if Darwinists can indeed talk of the “human race” at all) will be at different stages of evolution, and indeed, may well have evolved from different apes.  For example, the German evolutionist Klaatsch suggested in 1923 in his book The Evolution and Progress of Mankind that Caucasians were evolved chimpanzees, the Orientals were descended from orang-utans while Africans came from gorillas.

‘I have to say, I found it difficult before all this to see how any true Christian could have anything to do with the British National Party.  Now I should say it is impossible.  That leaves those who have inadvertently become involved with the BNP’s recently-created front organization, the so-called Christian Council of Britain, up the creek not so much without a paddle, but without any form of boat at all.

‘If there are genuine Christians still in the BNP in the mistaken belief that the Party is in some way defending the United Kingdom’s Christian heritage, what has emerged over the last few days leaves them with no option but to tear up their membership cards and get out.’

ENDS

NOTES:

(1) EMAIL EXCHANGE:
—– Original Message —–
From: <pressoffice_bnp@www.bnp.org.uk>
To: <info@christianvoice.org.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 8:41 AM
Subject: On the BNP

Dear Green, (sic)

One of our members advised me to look at your piece on the BNP – I’m so pleased that we have been able to draw out your particular form of un Christian hatred and your supreme ignorance – not just on matters of BNP policy but also on your total ignorance of science based genetic evolutionary theory.

Needless to say we will NOT be publicising your rant and will leave it to rot in the obscurity which your organisation so readily provides.

Dr Phil Edwards BNP National Press Officer

Reply sent 8/04/06 at 8.21 am:

Dear Dr Edwards,

Thank you for your email.  Not that obscure, eh, for you to take such interest in our piece?  Anyway, thanks for confirming the BNP belief that white people are more highly evolved than black.

Yours sincerely,
Stephen Green, M.A

Wernlwyd, Pen-y-bont, Carmarthen, SA33 6QN.
01994 484544 / 07931 490050
National Director, Christian Voice

Home

From: <pressoffice_bnp@www.bnp.org.uk>
To: “Christian Voice” <Stephen@christianvoice.org.uk>
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: On the BNP

It’s not our belief that white people are more highly evolved than blacks – it’s a conclusion derived over 100 years of medical and scientific research – and where’s the evidence they are as evolved as us? If you don’t believe in Darwinian evolution then you are even dafter than you appear. there’s no helping you. Well done in associating youselves with the Marxist terrorists and paedophiles of the SWP.  (sic)

Phil Edwards MSc, PhD.
BNP National Press Officer

(2) WHAT CHARLES DARWIN BELIEVED
It may be true that Darwin opposed slavery, but equally, he said that one of the strongest pieces of evidence for evolution was the existence of living ‘primitive races’ (‘missing links’ were not thought of as missing at all in Darwin’s day, but alive and living in Africa and aboriginal Australia).  Darwin (born in 1809, three years after the abolition of the slave trade) placed these evolutionarily between the ‘civilized races of man’ and the gorilla.  Thirty-seven years after the publication of The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1859) Darwin wrote, in The Descent of Man:

‘At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time, the anthropomorphous apes. . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla. … It has often been said … that man can resist with impunity the greatest diversities of climate and other changes; but this is true only of the civilized races. Man in his wild condition seems to be in this respect almost as susceptible as his nearest allies, the anthropoid apes, which have never yet survived long, when removed from their native country.’  (Darwin, Charles, 1871, republished 1896. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex; The Works of Charles Darwin, D. Appleton and Company, New York (First edition by AMS Press, 1972) pp 241-242)

In the sixth chapter of The Descent of Man, Darwin speculated that ‘survival of the fittest’ pressures would eventually eliminate both the black race, which he considered inferior, and other ‘lower races’. In addition, he concluded:

‘I could show [that war had] done and [is] doing [much] . . . for the progress of civilization . . . The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date . . . an endless number of lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.’   (Loc cit p343)

With acknowledgements to: http://www.biblebelievers.net/CreationScience/kjcevol1.htm

The British National Party

Recent newspaper articles have tried to discredit Christian Voice and  its campaign to stop Jerry Springer the Opera by suggesting that the British National Party were supporting our campaign against the production.  In fact, the BNP fully support the right of theatres to stage this blasphemous piece of work and the right of people to pay money to go and see it. This is hardly surprising as the BNP are an avowedly secular political party and are ‘freedom of expression’ allies of the National Secular Society.

The articles nevertheless prompted us to take a closer look at the BNP.  We found a racist, white supremacist, paganist, volkist, anti-Christian, evolutionist and anti-semitic organisation.  Angry, chippy and defensive are words which characterise a website lacking in Christian humanity.  The British National Party has also cynically spawned a pseudo-Christian offshoot, the so-called ‘Christian Council of Britain,’ members of which had the audacity to stand outside the De Montfort Hall in Leicester on the first night of Jerry Springer the Opera alongside the legitimate protest of the Stop Springer Christian witness.

Lancaster United Against Fascism said on their website: ‘The Christian Council of Britain, replete with one or two hundred rabid members of the BNP …, was set up by the BNP as a so-called balance to the Muslim Council of Britain. They claim to represent the Christians of Britain, which of course, they don’t. They actually represent a racist though supposedly Christian offshoot of the BNP formed solely so that the party could almost-legitimately jump on the back of the anti-‘Jerry Springer – The Opera’ campaign. The real Christian group who actually are organising the campaign have stated clearly that the BNP is unwelcome.’

Lancaster UAF are right.  We want nothing to do with either the white-supremacist BNP or the racial-separatist CCoB.  Just for the record, we read that God has made all nations ‘of one blood’ in Acts 17:26 and Paul tells the early church in Ephesus: ‘I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named.’ (Eph 3:14-15)  We welcome the presence in the UK of Black and Asian Christians, and can learn from and be encouraged by their willingness to stand up for the Christian Faith and for the holy name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

So far as the BNP is concerned, so much has been written about their racism and links to far-right groups that it almost seems superfluous to add anything.  However, just to confine ourselves to material on the BNP website, mainly from its 2005 General Election Manifesto, it would be enough to object to the following:

The BNP’s Racism

‘The British National Party exists to secure a future for the indigenous peoples of these islands in the North Atlantic which have been our homeland for millennia. We use the term indigenous to describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the historic migrations from mainland Europe.

‘We also call for preference in the job market to be given to native Britons (which the BNP also refer to as ‘white Britons.’)

‘15% of the UK’s male prison population is black, despite black people accounting for only 2% of the total population. … It is an inescapable statistical fact that immigration into Britain increases the crime rate.

‘On current demographic trends we, the native British people, will be an ethnic minority in our own country within sixty years.’

Its White Supremacism

‘We demand the right to be proud of Britain again, and for the English, Scots, Welsh, Irish and Ulster peoples to be allowed to celebrate their identity and heritage with as much right as is accorded to other native peoples.

‘We, as the sole political representatives of the Silent Majority of the English, Scots, Irish and Welsh who formed and were formed by our island home, have one overriding demand: We want our country back!

‘In order to guarantee the continued existence of our British democracy, we also intend to take long‑term steps to guarantee the continued existence, as the clearly dominant ethnic, cultural and political group, of the native peoples of these islands ‑ the English, Scots, Irish and Welsh ‑ together with the limited numbers of peoples of European descent, who arrived as refugees or economic immigrants centuries or decades ago, and who have fully integrated into our society.’

Its Nazi-Like Volk-Worshiping Romanticis

‘We will introduce the requirement that all children will be taught English as their first language in Britain, but also learn about their local ancestral language as well. This will apply to Welsh, Cornish, Manx, Scots Gallic, Doric or Lallans in Great Britain, and Ulster Lallans and Gaelic in Northern Ireland. English children will also be given an appreciation of the language of the Anglo‑Saxon folk and to appreciate the beauty of Anglo‑Saxon culture, such as its poetry, art and the meaning of citizenship.’

Its Hankering Back to Our Shameful Pagan Past

‘We value the folkways and customs which have been passed down through countless generations. We enthuse with pride at the marvels of architecture and engineering that have been completed on these islands since the construction of the great megaliths 7,000 years ago.

‘Schools in England will be encouraged to celebrate May Day and other ancient festivals, whilst the other folk nations of the British Isles will be encouraged to resurrect their ancestral folk traditions.’

Its Weird ‘Iona’ Project

‘Project IONA is a treasure trove of information about the people and places of these islands, a journey of discovery through the myths and legends which have their origins in the early beliefs of our ancestors about their place in the never ending wheel of nature and a tribute to the talented, brave, bold, determined, men and women who have bequeathed to us our own very special place in the universe.’

Its Evolutionism

‘Scientists studying various primates have now discovered that murderous ‘wars’ against different groups of the same species are as frequent among our non‑human relatives as they are among us.

(We also received a telephone call from a BNP official in early 2006 during which he tried to convince us of the theory of evolution and the proposition that black people were less highly evolved than white people.)

Its Rejection of Human Equality

‘We do not accept the absurd superstition ‑ propagated for different though sometimes overlapping reasons by capitalists, liberals, Marxists and theologians ‑ of human equality.

‘… a misty‑eyed post‑Christian fantasy about ‘equality’,’

‘Taking these facts into account, we believe that it is far more likely than not that the historically established tendency (and we do not claim that it is any more than that) of the peoples of Western Europe in general ‑ and of these islands in particular ‑ to create and sustain social and political structures in which individual freedom, equality before the law, private property and popular participation in decision‑making, is to some extent at least genetically pre‑determined.’

Its Anti-Semitism

Runs all the way through, with references to ‘Zionists’, ‘Zionism’, ‘the Zionist government of Israel’ and ‘the war-torn West Bank and Gaza inhabited by millions of displaced, poverty-stricken and persecuted Palestinians’ in which Israel is obviously the bad guy.  Also from the BNP website: ‘It is the perceived wisdom, one which the BNP obviously shares that it is the existence of the State of Israel which is primarily responsible for the lamentable state the world is in right now’  (Leslie Dale) and  ‘Israel is big enough, and bad enough, to look after itself.’ (Nick Griffin)

Its Criticism of Christian Voice

‘Christian Voice get ‘cold feet’.’  (We never had slightly warm ones.)

‘The recent unworthy utterances by some in Christian Voice, clearly anxious to distance themselves from the BNP in a futile attempt to make themselves more acceptable to a hostile media, does them no credit.’

(We’ll let Almighty God be the judge of that.)

The BNP on the So-Called ‘Christian Council of Britain’

‘The Christian Council of Britain has become the centre of news in Christian circles in the past few days. Visitors need to be aware that the CCoB is NOT part of the British National Party and it is separate entity with its own bank account, contacts and set of objectives.

‘Some nonsense stories have appeared in the mainstream Christian press stating that the BNP is secretly supporting the CCoB as if to give the organisation a sinister touch. Well we can be quite honest and open about the reality and that is this. There is no secret; the BNP will help any group of people who feel threatened, unrepresented …

‘So there are the plain and simple facts of the matter. The CCoB is now up and running and while some members of the British National Party may decide that they wish to continue the association and work with the Council that is a matter entirely for themselves to decide.’

(Quite a few seem to have done – Leicestershire representatives of CCoB quoted in the press have all been BNP activists.  Curiously, the statement appears to have vanished from the BNP’s website and is now only lurking on another white supremacist website: www.nationalvanguard.org )

From the Christian Council of Britain’s Own Website:

‘Our aims are to promote understanding of Christian values in Great Britain (Er, what about Northern Ireland?)  and to develop efforts for the benefit of Christians throughout the country.

‘The Christian faith is inextricably twined with the very fabric of Britain, it has historical influence, helped determine settlement patterns, bequeathed a rich architectural heritage and helped determine our very laws.’  (We agree with much of that, but …)

‘Above and beyond all those very visible and tangible aspects, the faith itself has helped define who we, the people of Britain are. For over 1500 years (Is that all?) the faith has molded (sic) our national psyche and spirit, defining our values toward life itself; our families, neighbours, animals, the natural environment and the wider society. Although the majority of English, Irish, Scots and Welsh no longer still attend church or recite prayers daily these islands are still Christian nations.’  (The UK is constitutionally Christian, that’s true.)

‘The Christian Council of Britain is a non‑denominational, non‑proselytising body of Christian ladies and gentlemen who have come together to ensure a healthy future for Christians in Britain.

‘At this time of moral crisis and faced with the very real prospect of the spiritual void being filled with dangerous creeds and cults, now more than ever, is a strong voice needed to reconnect church with the lost congregations.

‘The CCOB will aim to:

‘1. Promote conditions enabling Christians to speak with one united voice on matters of social justice, equality under the law and freedom of expression.

‘2. Work towards the removal of barriers to the expression of our faith and all forms of discrimination faced by Christians.

‘3. Strengthen the position of the Christian faiths as the foundation stones of life in Britain.

‘4. Raise awareness of the threat to our ancient faiths, values and our very existence by false prophets.’

‘The site is still under development and additional pages will be added in due course.’

(All reproduced exactly as is on christiancouncil.org.uk.  Add the http://www bit at the start if you wish to look them up.  We are deliberately not posting a hyperlink to their site.  What do they mean by ‘Christian faiths’ and ‘ancient faiths’ though?  Are we back with the BNP’s Volk-worship?)

http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/content/news_syndication/article_060314bnp.shtml

The above link to Jonathan Bartley’s Ekklesia site carries quotations from Rev Robert West, spokesman for the CCoB, who said things like:

‘There is a link in that the BNP has encouraged and facilitated the formation of the Christian Council of Britain. They are working as facilitators. They are supporting what we do.’

He denied however that he himself was a member of the BNP.  But, he said, the church ‘arose in connection with the Nick Griffin trial.’

The presenter then asked him (Rev Robert West) whether his views coincided with those of the British National Party.

‘The CCoB believes in the biblical teaching of nations. We should live in nations as nations’ West said.

‘If we are to exist as nations then we are to have our own national homelands. In our own national homelands in which our own identity has priority. The BNP doesn’t want the British people to be homeless. Each race should have its own space.’

When asked whether he would support the view of the BNP that people should be repatriated he said; ‘Yes. Provided it was by consent. Not by force.’

He said that he believed that the BNP’s repatriation policy was ‘in line with the scriptural doctrine that races are divided into nations and homelands.’

‘The mixing of races challenges the glory of God’ he said.

Last month the BNP placed online a video of a speech by West, who stated that a multiracial society is “a transgression of God’s will.”

Blair ‘Divorced from Reality’

Prime Minister Tony Blair’s speech on crime, anti-social behaviour and parenting is condemned today as ‘divorced from reality’ by Christian Voice.

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today:

“Until the Government starts to repair family life in the UK, the problems will continue to get worse. Crime and anti-social behaviour have a direct link to the destabilising of the traditional family unit.  In particular, it is the absence of their natural father in the lives of around half the children growing up today which means a generation of kids have no idea of right and wrong and no internal restraints.

“Part of the problem is the way the Government is encouraging promiscuity instead of chastity among teenagers.  That, coupled with an obsession with sex in what passes for our culture, has raised illegitimacy levels to the present unsustainable levels.

“Secondly, no fault divorce means either party to a marriage can break the solemn vows of their wedding day with impunity.  The single most effective thing the Government could do to bring down anti-social behaviour would be to make the granting of a divorce dependent on proving adultery, cruelty or desertion, and for all property and children from the marriage to go to the innocent party.

“For a guilty party to walk off with everything is an affront to Godly justice, and sows contempt of the entire judicial system.

“Obviously the Government should support married families and discourage the alternatives through the tax and benefit system.  But family law needs a simple, radical, legislative change as a priority.  Ending the injustice of no-fault divorce could more than halve the divorce rate overnight.  The Government won’t do that and so none of its ideas will work.  Tony Blair is in denial if he believes that he can bring down crime while still allowing Britain’s family base to crumble away.  In a very real sense, he is totally divorced from reality.”

Road Pricing ‘Big Brother’ says Christian Voice

Government proposals to replace the road fund license and fuel duty by road pricing dependent on satellite tracking have been described as “like Orwell’s Big Brother”  by Christian Voice,  the group behind the Jerry Springer the Opera protests, which also monitors assaults on civil liberties.

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today:

“Motorists are already taxed on how much they use the roads, by fuel duty.  Fuel duty also reflects the environmental impact of vehicles, highly-polluting vehicles paying more.

“The radical solution is to ring-fence transport income and expenditure in the Department of Transport, and plough all the money raised from motoring into road improvements, and more importantly, public transport.  It should be possible at least to halve fares on trains and buses and reach an equilibrium where fuel duty is subsidising an envirogated public transport system, based on a re-nationalised rail network.  Christian Voice have already proposed such an idea, in our alternative Queen’s Speech.

“We have a profound civil liberties issue with the Government’s proposals.  The satellite technology they depend on will track every vehicle. fitted with the spy-in-the-car black box.  Motorists will be paying for the transmitter and for the miles they drive, but the spin-off is that the Government will know where every car is at every moment.  Many of us don’t see why the Government should know where we are, and we see a similar control-freak mind-set in the pages of Orwell’s “1984”.  The Government will have data on the whereabouts of every vehicle, and we shall be financing their intrusion into our privacy.

“We must fight this proposal, and push for an alternative which will subsidise public transport and help the environment.  Our counter-proposal does exactly that.”

The Queen’s Speech

The QUEEN, being seated on the Throne, and attended by Her Officers of State (the Lords being in their robes), commanded the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, through the Lord Great Chamberlain, to let the Commons know, “It is Her Majesty’s pleasure they attend Her immediately in this House”.

Who being come, with their Speaker:

Her Majesty was pleased to speak as follows:

“My Lords and Members of the House of Commons,

“My Government will continue to pursue economic policies which entrench stability and promote long-term growth and prosperity.

“To this end, my Government will continue to secure low inflation and sound public finances.

“My Government will build on their programme of reform and accelerate modernisation of the public services to promote opportunity and fairness. My Government will bring forward legislation in the key areas of public service delivery: education; health; welfare; and crime.

“Education remains my Government’s main priority. My Government will further reform the education system to improve quality and choice in the provision of schooling, and build on the progress already made to improve educational standards for all.

“Legislation will be brought forward to offer greater support for working families by extending maternity benefits and improving the provision of childcare.

“My Government will continue to reform the National Health Service in a way that maintains its founding principles. Measures will be brought forward to introduce more choice and diversity in healthcare provision and to continue to improve the quality of health services and hospital hygiene. Legislation to restrict smoking in enclosed public places and workplaces will also be introduced.

“A Bill will be brought forward to support patients who wish to seek redress should they experience problems with their healthcare.

“My Government will continue their reform of the welfare state in order to reduce poverty further, offer greater equality, and match rights with responsibilities.

“My Government will introduce legislation to reform support for housing costs.

“A Bill will be introduced to establish benefits which will facilitate a return to employment, while offering long-term support for those unable to work.

“My Government will begin long-term reform to provide sustainable income for those in retirement.

“A Bill will be introduced to improve protection of consumers by bringing home reversion plans within the scope of the Financial Services Authority.

17 May 2005 : Column 6
“My Government are committed to creating safe and secure communities and fostering a culture of respect.

“Legislation will be taken forward to introduce an identity cards scheme.

“A Bill will be introduced to give police and local communities new powers to tackle knives, guns and alcohol-related violence.

“Further legislation will be introduced to tighten the immigration and asylum system in a way that is fair, flexible, and in the economic interests of the country.

“Proposals will be brought forward to continue the fight against terrorism in the United Kingdom and elsewhere.

“My Government will bring forward legislation to reduce reoffending by improving the management of offenders.

“Legislation will be introduced to reform the criminal defence service, making better use of legal aid resources.

“My Government believe that the welfare of the child is paramount. A Bill will be introduced to establish a barring and vetting scheme, and other measures to provide better protection for children and vulnerable adults.

“Legislation will be introduced to safeguard the welfare of children in circumstances of parental separation and to improve the process of inter-country adoption.

“My Government will continue with legislation to provide a new framework for the provision of compulsory treatment of those with mental disorders.

“Legislation will be introduced to modernise charity law, to develop a vibrant, diverse and independent charitable sector.

“My Government will take forward proposals to introduce an offence of corporate manslaughter.

“My Government will bring forward measures to tackle those who incite religious hatred.

“Legislation will be introduced to combat discrimination and to establish the Commission for Equality and Human Rights.

“My Government are committed to achieving sustainable development and supporting rural services.

“Legislation will be brought forward to ensure the better management and protection of the natural environment and to provide support for rural communities.

“A Bill to modernise the management of common land will be introduced.

“Legislation will be brought forward to help reduce casualties on the roads.

“My Government are committed to promoting efficiency, productivity and value for money. Legislation will be introduced to streamline regulatory structures and make it simpler to remove outdated or unnecessary legislation.

17 May 2005 : Column 7
“Consumer credit law will be updated to provide greater protection for consumers and to create a fairer, more competitive credit market.

“Company law will be reformed to encourage greater levels of investment and enterprise.

“Members of the House of Commons,

“Estimates for the Public Services will be laid before you.

“My Lords and Members of the House of Commons,

“My Government will continue to work closely with the devolved administrations in Scotland and Wales, and will work to bring about the conditions necessary for the restoration of political institutions in Northern Ireland.

“Legislation will be brought forward to encourage greater voter participation in elections while introducing further measures to combat fraud and increase security.

“Legislation will also be introduced to reform the National Assembly for Wales.

“My Government will bring forward proposals to continue the reform of the House of Lords.

“If London is selected to host the 2012 Olympic Games, legislation will be introduced as soon as possible to establish the necessary powers to ensure the delivery of the games, and that the requirements of the International Olympic Committee are met.

“My Government will establish a single system of service law for the Armed Forces.

“My Government will bring forward a Bill to give effect to the Constitutional Treaty for the European Union, subject to a referendum. Legislation will be introduced to ratify the treaty of accession of Romania and Bulgaria to the European Union.

“Other measures will be laid before you.

“My Government will continue to play their full part in international affairs.

“The Duke of Edinburgh and I look forward to our visit to Canada later today and to our state visit to Malta in November which precedes the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting. We look forward to our visit to Australia in March next year for the opening of the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne, followed by our state visit to Singapore. We also look forward to receiving Their Majesties King Harald and Queen Sonja of Norway in the autumn.

“The United Kingdom will take over the Presidency of the European Union in July, and my Government will work to build an increasingly prosperous and secure Europe.

“My Government will use their presidency of the G8 to secure progress in tackling poverty in Africa and climate change.

“My Government will continue to push for a resolution of the conflict in Darfur.

17 May 2005 : Column 8
“My Government will continue to work to prevent terrorism and the proliferation of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, and to combat drug smuggling and international crime.

“My Government will work to strengthen commitment to the continued effectiveness of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, and continue to contribute to a modern and representative United Nations.

“My Government will work to secure a successful outcome from the United Nations Millennium Review Summit and the ministerial meeting of the World Trade Organisation in Hong Kong in December.

“My Government will support the Iraq Transitional Government and Transitional National Assembly as they write a constitution and prepare for future elections.

“My Government will continue to assist the government of Afghanistan including in their counter-narcotics efforts, and to support better standards of governance throughout the world. Peace in the Middle East will remain one of my Government’s highest priorities.

“My Government will work to deepen and develop the strong partnership between Europe and the United States in order to meet these objectives.

“My Lords and Members of the House of Commons,

“I pray that the blessing of Almighty God may rest upon your counsels.”

House adjourned during pleasure.

House resumed at half-past three of the clock: The LORD CHANCELLOR on the Woolsack.

Prayers – Read by the Lord Bishop of Liverpool.

Several Lords – Took the Oath or Affirmed.

External Link: The United Kingdom Parliment

The Queen’s Speech (as it should be!)

Prayers for Parliament

“Our Father, which art in Heaven, Hallowed be Thy Name. Thy Kingdom come. Thy will be done, in earth as it is in Heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil. For thine is the kingdom, the power, and the glory, for ever and ever. Amen.

“Almighty God, by whom alone Kings reign, and Princes decree justice; and from whom alone cometh all counsel, wisdom, and understanding; we thine unworthy servants, here gathered together in thy Name, do most humbly beseech thee to send down thy Heavenly Wisdom from above, to direct and guide us in all our consultations; and grant that, we having thy fear always before our eyes, and laying aside all private interests, prejudices, and partial affections, the result of all our counsels may be to the glory of thy blessed Name, the maintenance of true Religion and Justice, the safety, honour, and happiness of the Queen, the publick wealth, peace and tranquillity of the Realm, and the uniting and knitting together of the hearts of all persons and estates within the same, in true Christian Love and Charity one towards another, through Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour. Amen.

“THE Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost, be with us all evermore. Amen.”

Her Majesty was pleased to speak as follows:

“My Lords and Members of the House of Commons,

“My Government’s central priority is to seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, knowing that all else, including economic prosperity and social stability, will be added.

“To this end, my Government will honour my Coronation Oath, which was to maintain the laws of God and the True Profession of the Gospel.  They will follow the precepts of the Holy Bible, which was given to me to be the rule for my whole life and Government.

“My Government will legislate in humility, recognising that God makes the law, not fallible human beings.

“A Bill will be introduced to reform the criminal justice system, away from the principle that crimes are committed against the State, and towards restorative justice on the Biblical model.  No-one will ever again be convicted or imprisoned in my realm on the evidence of one witness or accuser, but only on the evidence of two or three witnesses.  With the knowledge that criminals are soundly convicted, my Government will re-introduce the death penalty as the only way to make restoration in the case of murder, because God made man in His image.  Everyone, both accused and victim, will be treated equally under the law and my Government will repeal all legislation to do with the aggravation of offences.  A related Police Bill will restore the role of the police as custodians of public order rather than as agents of social change.  My Government will no longer use expressions like “war on terror” to soften up the public for identity cards or take away civil liberties granted by Almighty God.

“My Government will regard each human being, however vulnerable and dependent upon others, as made in the image of God.  For too long our land has been defiled with the blood of innocents shed in abortion clinics.  Tomorrow, my Government will direct that abortion will cease in all NHS hospitals, and a Health Bill will be laid before you swiftly to repeal the Abortion Act and to abolish in-vitro fertilisation.  Human life will be protected in our hospitals, and the withdrawal of food and water will be treated as murder.  My Government will also abolish private contracts in the NHS and will bring cleaning back under the control of hospital managers, who will be held directly responsible for deaths and incapacity through hospital-acquired infections.

“My Government are committed to restoring and rewarding trust, honesty and faithfulness. Legislation will be introduced to ensure that adultery, desertion or cruelty are restored as the only grounds for divorce, and divorce settlements will depend upon conduct, with joint property and children awarded to the innocent party.  My Government will end the injustice of secret family courts so that justice in family law is done and is seen to be done.

“At the heart of my Government’s programme is sound public finance.  My Government will not spend more than they can justly raise in taxation.  They will no longer borrow money that must be paid back by our children.  They will not spend taxpayers’ hard-earned money on grandiose schemes, expensive refurbishments, lavish entertaining, management consultants, politically-correct appointees, health education, party-political personnel and propaganda or quangos.  They will bring the functions of quangos back into government and give their various responsibilities back to ministers who will again be answerable for them in Parliament.  My Government will put forward no more public-private finance initiatives and will bring forward such legislation as may be necessary to wind up any outstanding initiatives.  Legislation will be brought before you to ensure lending institutions in the private sector only lend money responsibly.  A Bill will be introduced to abolish the National Lottery and repeal the Gambling Act 2005.

“Members of the House of Commons,

“Estimates for the public service will be laid before you, honestly reflecting legitimate areas of state concern.

“My Lords and Members of the House of Commons,

“A Bill will be introduced to prohibit anyone who has given money or favours to a political party from receiving a life peerage, and to prohibit donations to political parties by sitting peers.  Existing life peers who have given money to political parties will be replaced in the House of Lords by an equal number of those hereditary peers who were removed in 1999.

“My Government will set an example in public life by being comprised of trustworthy, honest, upright, able men.  Proven adulterers, cheats, liars, thieves and perverts will find no place in my Government.  My Government will show respect to the people of the United Kingdom and to Parliament and in that way will earn respect.  Members of my Government will behave in a righteous and seemly way.  My Government are sorry they have in recent years set the wrong sort of example and encouraged loutish behaviour everywhere and at every level in my realm.

“A Bill will be laid before you to restore the position of the father as guardian of his legitimate children, to restore the authority of parents over their children, to require criminal standards of evidence in open court before children are taken into local authority care and for related purposes. My Government are deeply sorry that so many families have been torn apart by social workers on the evidence of prejudiced doctors with axes to grind, and will ensure that all cases where this has happened are impartially and independently reviewed.  And by independently, this time my Government mean independently.

“My Government will make parents responsible for their children’s education and a Bill to abolish the Department of Education will be laid before you.  Where parents choose to delegate their personal responsibility to educate their children to schools, those schools will be run independently of Government, and legislation will be brought forward to ensure they are run and conduct teaching on Christian principles.

“My Government deeply regrets that so many young lives have been ruined through abortion or infertility by the teenage pregnancy strategy, and legislation will be introduced to ban the free distribution of contraceptives and school sex education and to encourage chastity and fidelity.

“My Government will bring forward a Bill to repeal all Acts of Parliament relating to sexual offences passed after 1957 and to repeal the Civil Partnership Act and the Gender Recognition Act of the last Parliament.

“My Government have to admit that having killed so many children in the womb, we now have a pensions crisis and a skills shortage.  My Government deeply regrets ignoring this problem all these years, and will have to introduce flexible retirement now.  My Government now believes we should treat elderly people as resources of knowledge and wisdom in the work place.  Other measures will be laid before you for pensions provision and to recognise the worth of families and children.  In the longer term, we should get back to replacing our population and allowing early retirement again, but my Government is sorry that for the next twenty or thirty years, it is going to be hard work.

“Legislation will be introduced to remove the burden of punitive taxation from motorists, and to restore justice to motoring law.  A Bill will be introduced to remove the requirement upon motorists to incriminate themselves or others after passing through speed traps and to abolish the current system whereby adjudicators are paid by the local authority seeking to recover parking fines.  My Government will seek to use the money raised by taxation on motorists solely to fund road-building and subsidise and improve public transport and a Bill will be introduced to restore the railways to public ownership.

“Since I owe my sovereignty to Almighty God alone, legislation will be brought forward to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Union.  This will release between 17 and 40 billion a year which my Government will use to reduce national debt and taxation.  We shall regain control over our industry, agriculture and fisheries, which we shall support and develop.  Restrictive legislation originating from the European Union since the United Kingdom joined will be repealed.

“My Government will strengthen the armed forces, conscious of our God-given duty to protect our subjects and will trust the people of the United Kingdom enough to legislate to allow them to hold arms for their self-defence, and for the defence of the realm.  My Government will not tolerate bullying or humiliating initiation rites in our armed forces or behaviour inconsistent with Christian standards.  Legislation will be brought forward to segregate men and women in operational units and to remove women from ships and front-line duties.

“The environment is central to our well-being and my Government will encourage good stewardship.  Legislation will be brought before you to ban genetically-modified products and plants in the United Kingdom and to encourage organic production and local preparation and distribution of food.  Further legislation will be introduced to encourage energy efficiency in all premises from domestic to government.  Legislation will also prohibit the sale of playing fields and allotments.  My Government support the sports of shooting and fishing, will repeal the Hunting Act 2004 and will instead legislate to prevent undue suffering to animals hunted.

“The cultural environment is equally as important, and my Government accept that much of what happens in our theatres and on television is corrupt, ungodly and demeaning, coarsening and degrading public life.  Legislation will be introduced to repeal the Obscene Publications Act and prohibit indecent displays and the use of obscene language and violence on stage, on screen and in literature, art and broadcasting.

“My Government are aware that they are responsible in the eyes of God to safeguard the necessities of life and that in spite of that they have done nothing to deal with Britain’s energy crisis.  They will build as many nuclear power stations as are necessary, and will remove the subsidies from wind generation.  They will undertake an urgent investigation into re-opening as many coal mines as possible, so that the United Kingdom may once more become self-sufficient in energy.  My Government also believe it is important for men to be in work and for British industry to retake its place in the world.  Legislation will be brought forward to require companies operating in Britain to locate call-centres in the United Kingdom rather than abroad.

“Measures will be brought forward to invigorate the Christian foundations of the United Kingdom, to restore Sunday as a day of rest, to encourage local authorities to honour Christian festivals such as Christmas and Easter, to celebrate our Christian heritage, to make the promotion of the Christian faith an unassailable charitable object, and to remove charitable status from bodies promoting other faiths and those hostile to the Christian faith.

“In Northern Ireland, my Government undertake that only those committed to purely democratic means will participate in government, and they will take full control over security without the involvement of foreign governments.

“My Government will bring our troops home from Iraq as soon as possible, and will not engage in unrighteous and unjust foreign adventures where no British interest or need for self-defence can be proven.  Legislation will be brought before you to restrict the sale of arms by British companies to foreign governments.

“A Bill will be introduced to reform asylum according to Christian principles, so that Christians genuinely persecuted abroad may find a safe haven in the United Kingdom, whilst excluding those seeking to take advantage of our hospitality for other reasons.  My Government is deeply concerned to defend persecuted Christian minorities around the world, and in Muslim and Hindu countries in particular, and will work to achieving the same levels of tolerance for Christian minorities in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and India as Muslims and Hindus enjoy in the United Kingdom.

“My Government is committed to fair trade rather than free trade, and will re-establish trading links with Commonwealth countries.  My Government will support the right of the state of Israel to exist in peace and will deal truthfully and straightforwardly with foreign governments.

“My Government will work for the cancellation of debt and will provide foreign aid from now on to small-scale projects which will genuinely benefit the poor rather than line the pockets of despotic rulers.

“My Government is committed to ensuring that future payments by the United Kingdom to the United Nations will be conditional on that body promoting righteousness and giving up its promotion of new age religion, birth-control, abortion and feminism world-wide.

“Other righteous measures will be laid before you.

“My Lords and Members of the House of Commons,

“You are about to go about the business of legislating according to the will of God rather than in your own limited wisdom, as you used to do. Therefore,

“I pray that the blessing of Almighty God may rest upon your counsels.”