Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
    Latest

    Globalism Depopulation ID

    Home Climate & Globalism Globalism Depopulation ID Page 8

    An Explosion of Olympic Conspiracy Theories

    By
    Christian Voice
    -
    24

    A series of surprising coincidences have led some theorists to issue a warning that the Illuminati may have a bomb that they are planning to detonate during the 2012 London Olympics. Many Christian Voice members have been concerned about this and have asked us to investigate the warnings raised in the video ‘London 2012 Olympics – 100,000 to Die?’

    We would like to make clear from the outset that we are not jumping on board with this conspiracy theory. Instead our intent is simply to present the relevant facts in as objective a manner as possible, so that our members (particularly those who live or work in London) are in a better position to make up their own minds on the matter.
    We begin by simply stating the facts.

    FACT #1: Large-scale disasters are often anticipated in comics, novels, simulations or TV programs prior to the event itself. These often mirror the real event with surprising detail.

    In 1886 a novelist anticipated the sinking of the Titanic in a book titled The Sinking of a Modern Liner. The website titanic.com website explains how there were amazing correspondences between the details in the novel and what actually transpired in 1912. But this was not the only premonition of the disaster. In 1898, the American author Morgan Robertson wrote a novel titled Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan, in which he also predicted the 1912 disaster with an almost uncanny precision. (To read more, see ‘Titanic Sinking Foretold In Fictional Accounts Years Before Disaster’)

    Prior to the bombing of the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, there were a number of references to it in stories and TV programs. Some of these described the event in surprising detail.  This includes:

    • a June 1983 edition of the Marvel Comic Book shows the tops of the Twin Towers destroyed after a take-over of the Third Reich.
    • A 1992 Deathstroke comic book shows one of the twin towers on fire with an eerie resemblance to what would later transpire.
    • In 1993 the French Comic Book Mortadelo & Filemon showed an image of a plane crashing into the World Trade Center in nearly the exact location that the first plane hit in 2001
    • In 1995 Steve Jackson’s Illuminati: New World Order game was released. Included in the playing cards was one for ‘Terrorist Nuke’ which had pictures which almost perfectly depicted the attack of 9/11.
    • The 1998 movie Armageddon shows the World Trade Center on fire in a scene that looks almost identical to how the buildings looked in real life after being attacked
    • The original album cover for the music group ‘The Coup’s’ 2001 album ‘Party Music’ depicted members of the group standing in front of the twin towers while they are being destroyed by huge explosives. The album’s planned release date was just after the September 11 attacks, but the cover art was quickly changed.
    • For years the US military had run drills years of planes being used as weapons against the World Trade Center. In fact, on September 11th 2001, the government happened to be running a simulation of a plane crashing into a building. Read more about this here and here.
    • In March 2001, the pilot episode of ‘The Lone Gunman’ dealt with the hijacking of a commercial airliner and the aborted attempt to crash the airliner into the World Trade Center.

    Prior to the  London bombings on 7 July 2005, BBC Panorama ran a program which featured a mock exercise in which terrorists bombed three underground trains and one road vehicle. In the fictional program, these events take place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour, leading to a public announcement that “the attacks bear the hallmarks of Al-Qaeda.’ The Program ran on 16 May 2004, nearly a year before 7/7 bombings which also involved bombs on three underground trains and one road vehicle during a short space of time during the morning rush hour, followed by Jack Straw announcing, “The attacks bear the hallmarks of al-Qaeda.” (Information about the Panorama program can be obtained from the BBC website, while a transcript of it is available here.)

    Moreover, leading up to the 7/7 bombings there were four other simulations or fictional scenarios which anticipated the event with a surprising degree of accuracy. These have been documented here and here.

    On July 20th, Colorado university conducted an Advanced Disaster Life Support Training exercise based around an imagined gunman firing at people in a movie theater. A few hours later that day, the imagined event occurred in real life as James Holmes entered a Colorado movie theatre and began firing on viewers. What was spooky was the detail in which the simulated event mirrored the real one. (For more information, see ‘Eerie Coincidence: Colorado University Had Identical Drill On Same Day As ‘Batman’ Massacre.’)

    FACT #2: the idea that a major catastrophe will happen during the London Olympics has been occurring in media and other places, even as premonitions or intimations of the disasters mentioned above have occurred prior to the event.

    In his article, ‘Will There Be A Terrorist Attack at the 2012 London Olympics?’ Christopher Woodward noted that “In recent years there have been many signs within the media signalling a planned terrorist attack at the 2012 London Olympics.”

    The main example of this is that in August 2008 the BBC broadcasted a series of programs called Spooks: Code 9. The program envisaged a nuclear attack on the Olympic Stadium during the London 2012 Olympics. Woodward adds to this the following examples, some of which are no longer applicable now that the opening ceremony has come and gone without incident:

    The movie 2012 contains a scene in which a character is looking for a map inside a plane when trying to escape an exploding volcano. The first map he picks up and then fully opens is a map of the London underground, which can be clearly seen to viewers. Is this a sign of a future threat in London in 2012?

    The late August 2011 edition of the British political satire magazine Private Eye had a cover title with the words ‘Olympic Rehearsal’, accompanied by an image of the recent London riots containing a speech balloon with the words ‘This is the worst opening ceremony ever.’

    Another card used in the Illuminati game has a picture of Big Ben being blown up and five men, each of them wearing different colours, red, blue, yellow, green and black – the same colours of the five Olympic rings. In the same way as the cards depicting the 9/11 attacks, could this card be a sign of a planned terrorist attack at the London Olympics?

    In July 2005, soon after London had won the bid to host the Olympics, it was reported that the Olympic Park site where the Games were planned to take place is the site of a former nuclear reactor.

    In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation released a report entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development. In one of the potential future scenarios considered, the report stated that, “the years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the “doom decade” for good reason; the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000.”

    Given that the number 13 is considered to be a key number used by the illuminati to reveal a secret coded message, and the significance of the Rockefeller Foundation in working to bring about a new world order behind the scenes, alongside other tax-exempt foundations, is this report yet another sign of a planned terrorist attack at the London Olympics?

    To the above should be added the fact that the London Olympics produced an eerie advertisement in which an athlete squashes Big Ben before pulling the world together. (While the video ‘Olympic Adverts predicting an attack on London?’ has some bizarre conspiracy theories about Zionists, it is useful in showing the original advert.)

    FACT #3: The 2012 London Olympics, and the stories about an Olympic holocaust, have been saturated in Illuminati and Freemasonry symbolism.

    The video ‘London 2012 Olympics – 100,000 to Die?‘ demonstrates the proliferation of Illuminati symbolism in the Olympics, in everything from the one-eyed mascots to the design of the stadium lighting.

    Furthermore, Spooks: Code 9, which seemingly predicts a large scale disaster during the games, is replete with similar symbolism. Quoting again from Christopher Woodward’s article:

    There are a number of scenes in [Spooks: Code 9] in which the background contains the all-seeing eye symbol, as displayed on dollar notes, and commonly placed in the background on the logos of many corporations. It is thought to signal a coded message from the Iluminati.The all-seeing eye is similarly displayed on the homepage of Kudos, the production company behind Spooks: Code 9, and also depicted on Wenlock and Mandeville, the London 2012 official mascots.

    In the first episode, a character asks to have exactly 330 minutes to find a killer. What may appear to be an unusual and illogical amount of time to request, may actually be a deliberately coded message. The number 330 may be a reference to 33, which points to the 33 degrees of Freemasonry. This could be a sign that the Freemasons are behind the programme and are conveying a secret coded message. The decision to include the phrase Code 9 in the title could be a signal towards a coded message in the programme, conveying that the events that take place in the series are planned to happen in the real world.

    FACT #4: The global elites use large-scale crises to legitimize totalitarian measures and to push us closer to a one-world government.

    The global elites know that the public is usually willing to surrender substantial liberties if they feel their security is at stake. Often a high-profile emergency will legitimise legislation that was already waiting in the wings, ready to be put forward after a disaster has ‘primed’ the public to believe it is necessary.

    This basic principle is nothing new. Classical Greece and Rome had a tradition of appointing a dictator during times of crisis. After the crisis finished, the dictator stepped down and government returned to normal, usually to some form republic or oligarchy. Following this tradition, modern leaders frequently appeal to times of real or alleged ‘crisis’ to persuade the populace to entrust them abnormal powers. The other difference is that the totalitarian provisions introduced by modern leaders do not go away after the crisis is over but remain operative.

    We see this time and again. Consider only a few examples.

    • On 13th March 1996, one Thomas Hamilton murdered 16 children and one adult at Dunblane in Scotland.  The official report expressed concerns over Hamilton’s mental state and known sexual pre-occupation with young boys, and police errors over the renewal of his gun license. Four months later on 27th February 1997 the Firearms (Amendment) Act was enacted, banning all hand-guns. (For further reading about this, see ‘Blair’s Protection of Elite Paedophile Rings Spells the End For His Career’ and ‘Police ‘lost’ key files on Dunblane killer.’)
    • When the Twin Towers were bombed on 9/11, conservatives as well as liberals in America were ready to embrace the ‘War on Terror.’ Now, eleven years later, this ‘war’ is being used to justify the introduction of wartime conditions into America. Because this conflict is against an undefined and ubiquitous foe, the conditions for surrender can never be met.
    • After the 7/7 bombings, the Government increased the amount of time people could be held for questioning.  Moreover, as action group Liberty warned on their website a year after the events, these bombings created an atmosphere favourable to “counter-productive legislation which restricts fundamental rights and freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism.”
    • After the tragic murder of ‘Baby P’ in 2009, the social services in the UK began interfering in family life to an unprecedented extent, with full support from the Government.
    • When the riots broke out in London last year, almost immediately government was ready with legislation to increase police powers and restrict internet freedom. (See ‘UK Riots: the Totalitarian Aftermath.’)
    • John Laughland has showed in his book The Tainted Source: Undemocratic Origins of the European Idea how the earliest defenders of the European Union appealed to the disaster of fascism to justify the abolition of national sovereignty.
    • George Soros and Co. have appealed to the disaster of the Rwandan genocide in order to justify a new theory of national sovereignty which creates the template for a one world government.

    The pattern holds again and again: high-scale disaster followed by either tighter governmental control, or a type of centralization which seeks to undermine the division between nations. David Rockefeller put his finger on it in 1994 when he declared, “All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the new World Order.”

    CONCLUSION

    The above facts are leading many to fear that a high-scale disaster is being planned to occur sometime during the London Olympics. However, the concern is based largely on Fact #1, which might be attributable to simple coincidence. It could be that millions of weird coincidences occur every day but we only hear about the dramatic ones or the ones that people have had an incentive to discover through hours of careful research. For this reason, Christian Voice remains sceptical. Moreover, we certainly do not believe that ‘the Jews’ are behind it all, as some of the conspiracy theorists cited above have alleged.

    No doubt many terrorist groups would like to cause trouble at the Olympics, and no doubt our government would love to curtail our liberties even more, but we remain sceptical that those in power in London would allow an atrocity to proceed which would damage the international standing of their capital city, let alone a nuclear explosion which would close it down completely.

    All the same, we have wanted to present these objective facts to our members so that they can make up their own minds and share this post with friends.

    We certainly urge prayer that the Lord will bring any plots to light and thwart all and any attempts to cause loss of life or liberty at the games.

    One last thing is certain, whether or not the conspiracy theorists are right, the Olympic enterprise is under judgment from God because of the paganism at its root and the sexual licentiousness with which it has come to be associated. (See ‘Olympic Village Sex Fest‘ for a shocking report on what has been going on during these Olympics.)

     

    Join Christian Voice today and stand up for righteousness in the land:

     

    ‘World’s first’ multi-faith centre – in Cornwall

    By
    Stephen
    -
    19

    What is claimed to be the world’s first multi-faith facility is being planned, rather appropriately, on land owned by Cornwall Council in the grounds of Penmount Crematorium in Truro, Cornwall’s county town and home to Truro Cathedral.

    The Dor Kemmyn Interfaith Centre, according to the Western Morning News, ‘is hoped to serve (sic) the needs of all faith groups, including Buddhists, Hindus, Pagans, Jews, Muslims, Bahais and Christians’.  Christians are always last on lists like that.

    All that is needed now for the construction of the elliptical facility is a cool £750,000.  In the meantime, there will be ‘a contemporary circle of timber posts that maps out the geometry of the building’, which Cornwall Faith Forum, the charity behind the project (Charty number 1147514), are calling ‘Woodhenge’.

    Despite such a nod towards paganism, real pagans appear unimpressed by Dor Kemmyn and the Cornwall Faith Forum, with one describing the latter as ‘just playing to the PC brigade.’

    Matt Robinson, of Matt Robinson Architecture, is the building designer and a spokesman for the charity.  He says ‘the build schedule (depends) on fundraising’.

    He continued: “We are trying to do it for people who are curious about faith.

    “They may want to find out about Islam or Buddhism so this will act as a library or a resource centre, which can also be used for funerals and weddings.”

    So if you want some faith, you can pop along to the Dor Kemmyn centre and choose from those on display.

    But all is not quite as Mr Robinson would make it appear.  ‘Dor Kemmyn’ is Cornish for ‘Common Ground’, so this is a syncretisitc project in which all religions are basically the same, agreeing in essentials and disagreeing merely in peripheral matters.  As they say:

    ‘The centre will take an inclusive rather than an exclusive approach and will be for the use of all those who can sign up to an agreed, shared set of common values rather than through any attempt to define or list individual “faiths or belief systems”.‘

    The Dor Kemmyn website carries many quotes, and has a page on what it calls Cornwall’s ‘Spiritual Heritage’ on which we find that Cornwall’s ancient Buddhist heritage dates back as far as the 1970s and that there are no Hindu temples in Cornwall. 

    Nowhere on the Dor Kemmyn website do we find anything pressing the crown rights or the saving grace of Jesus Christ.  And that is surprising, given that the contact for its parent charity, the Cornwall Faith Forum, according to the Charity Commission, is Rev Andrew Yates, of the Truro Diocese Board of Finance, and one of the trustees is the current Bishop of Truro, Rt Rev Tim Thornton, who is standing up for marriage.  Dor Kemmyn itself is contacted via Diocesan House, Kenwyn, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 1JQ where the contact is Rita Stephen, the Interfaith Development Worker, whose email is given as: info@dorkemmyn.org.uk

    Here is a quote, currently on the Dor Kemmyn ‘events’ page, from one Dhirasanta Das, a Hindu: ‘Interfaith centres can provide a space suitable for multi-religious education and its practices. This will help check the imbalance of values in life, achieve real unity within the community and peace throughout the world.’

    No it won’t.  The Bible says that peace is only found in the Lord Jesus, who said (John 14:27) ‘Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid’.  The same Lord Jesus told us that there will be ‘wars and rumours of wars’.

    The Dor Kemmyn website says: ‘Recent events in Cornwall including vandalism, graffiti etc have also indicated that a centre such as this is needed to help support the community in addressing potential conflict through dialogue rather than through violence’.  ‘To help support the community’?  What does that mean? 

    It might be argued that those committing acts of vandalism need to be brought before the courts, that the need for the Dor Kemmyn centre, and the interim ‘Woodhenge’, is just as alive as those going into the incinerators of the neighbouring Penmount Crematorium.

    Join Christian Voice today and stand up for righteousness in the land:

     

    How to protect your email address

    By
    Stephen
    -
    7
    Rev Claude Portelli fell for the 'update your email' scam. See below. Never click on an unexpected link, however plausible it seems. Photo from Times of Malta
    Rev Claude Portelli fell for the 'update your email' link scam.  Never click on an unexpected link, however plausible it seems.  See below. Photo from Times of Malta
    Rev Claude Portelli fell for the ‘update your email’ link scam.  Never click on an unexpected link, however plausible it seems.  See below. Photo from Times of Malta

    This is very important, so please read it carefully.  Increasingly we receive emails showing that people we know have been hacked.  Leaving aside anti-virus like AVG and programmes such as MALWAREBYTES, you must use common sense and take basic precautions!

    The hackers work in two main ways:

    1 Email links.  They try to get you to click on a bogus web-link in an email apparently from someone you know whom they have already hacked.  SO: NEVER EVER click on links in a short email about a ‘private message’ or ‘photographs’ or ‘make serious money’ or just a link on its own.  NEVER EVER click on a link which appears to be from your email provider saying it is an update or claiming you will lose your emails if you don’t respond. or from your bank.  Such emails are known as ‘phishing’.  They wait for some unsuspecting person to take a bait.   Also, it goes without saying:  NEVER OPEN an attachment you were not expecting.

    These links and attachments will all lead to ‘trojan’ websites which leave viruses or search for personal information on your computer.  They then hack into your email client programme and repeat the process to all your contacts in the twinkling of an eye.

    2 Phone calls out of the blue in which a plausible young man or woman asks you to verify your email address and password (or your bank account, or whatever).  NEVER EVER give these people any information at all.  If you are ringing your internet provider it is a different matter of course.

    If you receive a pleading email saying that a friend has been mugged in Spain or London (these are the most popular) or indeed anywhere else in the world and asking for money, they have been hacked in one of the ways above.  Don’t reply, but ring your friend immediately to let them know what has happened.  The hackers will have sent the mail to everyone on your friend’s address book and then they will have deleted the address book contents for good measure.  That is why you should not rely on web-based address books and should always back up addresses on your computer.  (If you do not know how to do that, email us)

    We hope this helps you protect your email address and personal details.  Please circulate this webpage widely, but not as an anonymous link!  Tell your friends what it is about and authenticate it with a personal message.

    Finally, to anyone who uses their work computer, particularly in the public sector, for Kingdom business, it will be wise especially in these days to let your Christian contacts know your personal email instead.  Also, obviously, you should not be doing Kingdom work in the firm’s time.

    Join Christian Voice today and stand up for righteousness in the land:

     

    Syria – Thank God for the Russians

    By
    Stephen
    -
    51
    A Syrian rebel brandishes a looted cross in stolen vestments – attribution to www.prisonplanet.com

    Only Russian and Chinese resistance to Western stupidity is standing between Israel, Syria’s Alawite minority, the Christians in Syria – and a bloodbath.

    The Christian church will go the same way as our brothers in Iraq where the American and British invasion and toppling of Saddam, despotic as he was, has led directly to systematic persecution of the Christian church.  In every country affected by the ‘Arab Spring’ the writing is on the wall for Christians.  Similarly in Syria, if the Islamic fundamentalist rebels gain power, they will be gradually exterminated.

    Stop Press: The BBC News at Ten reported on the growing persecution on the Syrian church on 31st July, just four days after this post was filed.  Hard to take what the Muslim Brotherhood man says at the end, mind!

    The same fate will befall the Alawites, of whom President Assad is the most prominent figure, if his secular regime falls.

    And if Syria’s stock of chemical and biological weapons falls into the hands of the Islamic rebels, there could be carnage both in Syria and in Israel.  Sales of gas masks are already booming in the latter.  While it is true that Syria has funded and supplied Hezbollah with weapons used against Israel, a fundamentalist regime running Syria with control of President Assad’s arsenal – which he has never used – is a dangerous prospect indeed.

    Britain is ‘fanning the flames of violence’

    Russia has said that Western and Saudi calls for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step down are blocking efforts to end 16 months of unrest in the country, reports Israel Nation News.

    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that such calls — made by the United States, Britain, several European and Arab governments and Turkey — were fanning the flames of violence.  Support for Syrian rebel groups was tantamount to backing terrorism, he said.

    “We propose things that would allow for an immediate ceasefire, but the other side says, ‘No, either the regime capitulates or we will continue to back … the opposition’s armed fight’, justifying terrorist acts,” Lavrov said.

    The Russians and Chinese are both standing against the doctrine of ‘Responsibility to Protect’, developed and funded by George Soros, by which nations who regard themselves as global policemen can enforce regime change on countries which are not democratic enough.  Christian Voice reported last August on WorldNetDaily’s exposure of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect in connection with Libya.

    (SInce then it has emerged that Soros persuaded President Obama to send troops to Uganda, ostensibly to arrest the leader of the so-called Lord’s Resistance Army, but really to safeguard the oil interests of one George Soros.)

    Israel will strike if rebels raid weapons

    Israel’s foreign minister warned on Wednesday his country will act immediately if it discovers Islamic militants are raiding Syria’s chemical or biological weapons stocks, Associated Press has reported.

    Israeli political and security leaders have been watching the intensified bloodletting in neighbouring Syria with mounting concern, afraid that Lebanon’s Hezbollah and other militant groups could raid these arsenals should the central government in Damascus collapse. In recent days, Israeli political leaders have said they would be prepared to strike weapons depots to prevent this from happening.

    Destroy all churches

    On 12th March this year, Sheik Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah, the grand mufti of Saudi Arabia, declared that it is “necessary to destroy all the churches of the region.” The mufti based his decision on a story that on his deathbed, Muhammad declared, “There are not to be two religions in the [Arabian] Peninsula.”

    Churches have always been banned in Saudi Arabia, but in the Iraq of Saddam Hussein, in Syria, and in other Muslim lands before they came under the sway of the George Soros-funded Muslim Brotherhood, Christians were allowed to practise their faith and formed a thriving minority community.

    As the Washington Times reported at the time: ‘This is not a small-time radical imam trying to stir up his followers with fiery hate speech. This was a considered, deliberate and specific ruling from one of the most important leaders in the Muslim world. It does not just create a religious obligation for those over whom the mufti has direct authority; it is also a signal to others in the Muslim world that destroying churches is not only permitted but mandatory.’

    Saudi Arabia is supporting the Syrian rebels with money and weaponry.

    Naive and simplistic

    The approach of the British Government is both naive and simplistic.  In following the slavish devotion to democracy at all costs promoted and financed by the Open Society movement of George Soros, they are encouraging the Muslim Sunni majority in Syria to destroy all others.

    It is not, as Mr Hague seems to think; ‘Assad bad, rebels good’.  Nor can the rebel reports given pride of place on the BBC be trusted as the gospel truth.  There is spin and worse on all sides of this conflict.

    In a letter to a constituent dated 24th July, Mr Hague said: ‘You have raised concerns regarding the persecution of Christians in Syria.  Since the Syria uprising more than a year ago, the Assad regime has demonstrated time and again that it is unwilling to protect the rights, freedoms and interests of all its fellow citizens.’

    Mr Hague’s statement is duplicitous.  Mr Assad is not persecuting Christians and never has.  It is the rebels who are doing that already and who will do it all the more if they gain power.   In addition, President Assad is part of a minority group himself.  He is an Alawite Shia Muslim, despised by the 74% of Syria’s population who follow the Islamic Sunni religion.

    Mr Hague goes on: ‘In our regular dialogue, we are encouraging Syrian opposition groups to reach out and engage with minority communities, including Christians, and to maintain a clear commitment to a peaceful and non-sectarian approach.’

    So Mr Hague admits he is in touch with the rebels.  Worryingly, he expects them to behave as if they were taking part in a vicarage tea party.  He speaks as if he really thinks the world is like a civilised home counties drawing room.  He may really believe that or he may be pretending to.  Either way, by backing the rebels, our Government like that of America and most of Europe is preparing the way for a middle-east bloodbath.

    Thank God for the Russians and the Chinese.

    PRAY: That Britain will pull back from its unqualified support of the Syrian rebels and realise that the Assad regime, with all its faults, remains the last protector of the Christian and Alawite minorities in Syria.  Pray for more even reporting of the conflict.  Pray that the Russians and Chinese will stand firm against Western and Saudi duplicity.

    Ask your MP – Email address HERE – to ask the Foreign Secretary what contacts Her Majesty’s Government is having with Syrian rebels and what political, financial and weaponry assistance it has given them.  You could ask your MP to ask the Foreign Secretary to support President Assad instead.  Ask your MP also to ask the Foreign Secretary to comment on the reports of Syrian rebel persecution of Christians and Alawites (he won’t say anything positive, and will not say what assistance he is giving, but he will know you are there and concerned.)

    Join Christian Voice today and stand up for righteousness in the land:

     

    Nationwide in ‘Bigot’ award challenge

    By
    Stephen
    -
    15

    Christian Voice Press Release – 10.40 hrs 14th July 2012

    The Nationwide Building Society is to be challenged over its association with the Stonewall ‘Bigot of the Year’ award at its AGM this coming Thursday.

    Stephen Green, who was shortlisted for the award last November along with Sir Brian Souter, Bishop Arthur Roche, Bill Walker MSP and the eventual ‘winner’ journalist Melanie Phillips, plans to put down a question at the AGM, to be held in Manchester at 11am at the Bridgewater Hall in Lower Mosley Street, Manchester, M2 3WS.  Doors open at 10am and any Nationwide member with at least £100 in savings or owed on a mortgage can attend.

    Mr Green, who is National Director of Christian Voice, the group best known for its successful campaign against Jerry Springer the Opera, is a Nationwide member.  He said today:

    ‘Nationwide sponsored the 2011 Stonewall awards dinner, which did not stop the greedy lobby group charging £180 a ticket (£150 plus VAT).  I intend to ask how much money Nationwide gave, whether they knew the nature of the event they were sponsoring, whether they support the redefinition of marriage, one of Stonewall’s key aims, and when they plan to apologise for bank-rolling an event which insulted and humiliated not just a humble Nationwide member like me, but respected public figures.

    ‘In particular, Sir Brian was awarded a knighthood by Her Majesty in June 2011, just months before he was vilified by Stonewall.

    ‘Nationwide have said they are “not supportive of the vilification of individuals” and that they “have made this clear to Stonewall”.  They have pulled out of sponsoring future events, while remaining ‘members’ of Stonewall.  No-one on the Nationwide Board of Directors has yet been man enough to apologise to any of the individuals concerned, and I think they should.

    ‘Of course, not one of those shortlisted was invited by Stonewall to attend, which was a grave discourtesy.  But as “Bigot of the Year” is merely an attempt by Stonewall to bully and humiliate someone in public life, Stonewall won’t ever find the courage to invite those shortlisted for fear that the winner might tell the assembled gays a few home truths.

    ‘It seems homosexuality can only advance by insulting and browbeating its opponents.  But I hope the Nationwide experience will send a message through the world of business that the Stonewall awards dinner is a toxic brand.’

    ENDS

    For further information, phone Stephen Green on 07931 490050.

    Note: You can send an email to the Nationwide Chief Executive, Graham Beale:

    gjbeale2@nationwide.co.uk

    Note: Previous article on the Stonewall ‘awards dinner’ and Nationwide’s involvement:

    Stonewall ‘cowards’ call Melanie Phillips ‘Bigot of the Year’

    Land Address for Stephen Green and the Christian Voice office:
    Wernlwyd, Pen-y-bont, CARMARTHEN, SA33 6QN
    01994 484544 / 07931 490050

    Join Christian Voice today and stand up for righteousness:

    Join Christian Voice today and stand up for righteousness in the land:

    Kings of the Earth meet this weekend

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0
    Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke MP

    News breaks that some favoured politicians and bankers from the United Kingdom are shunning our gracious Queen’s diamond jubilee celebrations this weekend to cosy up to the movers and shakers of the world’s elite.

    The ‘Bilderberg’ group is meeting in Chantilly, Virginia, USA from 31st May to 3rd June under the chairmanship of Henri de Castries, Chairman and CEO of AXA, to plan and plot world events.  Whatever these people decide, and their plans do not always work out, it is likely to be designed to benefit them first and the rest of us a long way behind.

    On the invitation list from the UK are:

    * Bankers Marcus Agius, Chairman of Barclays and Douglas J. Flint, Group Chairman of HSBC Holdings. 

    * Oilmen Robert Dudley, Group Chief Executive of BP and Peter Voser, the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell

    * Journalists John Micklethwait, the Editor-in-Chief of The Economist, Gideon Rachman, Chief Foreign Affairs Commentator of The Financial Times and the FT’s Chief Economics Commentator, Martin H. Wolf.  Vendeline von Bredow, the Business Correspondent of The Economist and the same publication’s Foreign Correspondent, Adrian D. Wooldridge are denoted ‘Rapporteurs’ for the meeting, but despite that designation, and the presence of such well-connected journo’s, don’t expect to see anything about the meeting in the papers.  It’s top secret, you see, with armed guards and a publicity ban.

    The UK’s gay mafia is well represented with Peter, Lord Mandelson, who is now Chairman of ‘Global Counsel’, whatever that is, and Nick Boles, MP, a member of David Cameron’s kitchen cabinet and a good friend of modernisers Boris Johnson and Francis Maude.  Kenneth Clarke, MP is a long-standing Bilderberg member and part of its inner circle, as are Agius and the remaining UK delegate, retired diplomat John Lord Kerr of Kinlochard.

    Only recently, the Bilderberg Group has started a website and now publishes a press release.  You can see it at http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meeting_2012.html and you can click on the other buttons on the site to see the full list of those attending together with the ‘Governance’ of the group.

    Apparently, ‘the privacy of the meetings, … has no purpose other than to allow  participants to speak their minds openly and freely’.  ‘Bilderberg is a small, flexible, informal and off-the-record international forum in which different viewpoints can be expressed and mutual understanding enhanced’.  ‘Bilderberg’s only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued’.

    So that’s alright then.  Pray that all plans for globalism and world domination are thwarted.  Pray this Psalm:

    Psalm 2:1  Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
    2  The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
    3  Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
    4  He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.
    5  Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.
    6  Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
    7  I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
    8  Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
    9  Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
    10  Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.
    11  Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
    12  Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

    David Cameron does God – up to a point

    By
    Stephen
    -
    32

    David Cameron has quoted from the Gospel of Luke and spoken of ‘we’ Christians at a pre-Easter reception at Downing Street.

    Tony Blair and Alastair Campbell famously didn’t ‘Do God’, but Mr Cameron is making rather a habit of it.  As Easter Sunday approaches, Mr Cameron has decided to “do God” in public, as Alastair Campbell might say.

    In December last year, the Prime Minster called for a return to Christian values during a service held in Westminster Abbey to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible.

    He said there were three reasons why the King James Bible was as relevant today as any point in its history.

    “First, the King James Bible has bequeathed a body of language that permeates every aspect of our culture and heritage. Second, just as our language and culture is steeped in the Bible, so too is our politics.

    “Third, we are a Christian country. And we should not be afraid to say so. Let me be clear: I am not in any way saying that to have another faith – or no faith – is somehow wrong.”

    Now Mr Cameron has held a reception in Downing Street and quoted from the Gospel of Luke as he spoke of “we”  Christians.

    “This is the time when, as Christians, we remember the life, sacrifice and living legacy of Christ. The New Testament tells us so much about the character of Jesus; a man of incomparable compassion, generosity, grace, humility and love. These are the values that Jesus embraced, and I believe these are values people of any faith, or no faith, can also share in, and admire.

    “It is values like these that make our country what it is – a place which is tolerant, generous and caring. A nation which has an established faith, that together is most content when we are defined by what we are for, rather than defined by what we are against. In the book of Luke, we are told that Jesus said, ‘Do to others as you would have them do to you’ – advice that when followed makes for a happier, and better society for everyone.”

    He told the assembled guests that he welcomed a Christian “fightback”. He said: “I think there’s something of a fightback going on, and we should welcome that. The values of the Bible, the values of Christianity, are the values that we need.”

    Interestingly, this is what Jesus said about marriage, which Mr Cameron wants to change into a ‘gay’ version:

    Mar 10:6  “But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. 7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; 8 And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. 9 What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”

    Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said:

    “The last verse, Mark 10:9, is normally taken to refer to individual marriages, which people in Britain today set aside as a routine.  I’ve been on the receiving end of divorce on demand.  Some fifty percent of marriages are now being put asunder because one party simply decides to walk out.

    “But David Cameron wants to put asunder the whole institution of marriage as ordained in the beginning by God Almighty.  In 2007 he voted for the Sexual Orientation Goods and Services Regulations which have been used against Christian hoteliers operating the values of the Bible, yet now he urges a ‘fightback’ against secularism.

    “David Cameron voted to abolish the blasphemy laws in May 2008, which provided a foundation for a culture of respect for both God and man.  In the same month he voted to allow animal/human hybrid embryos.  A day later he voted to allow abortion – or the murder of children in the womb – at 16 weeks gestation, a time when every organ and every brain function is in place and operating.  It was good that he quoted Christ’s ‘golden rule’ from Luke 6:13 (and Matthew 7:12) but he would not allow to be done to him what he allows to be done to children in the womb.

    “It is a good beginning to call for Christian values and to urge a Christian fight-back, but Mr Cameron’s thinking needs to be joined up.  He needs to be transformed by the renewing of his mind.  How can he in all seriousness urge a ‘fight-back’ against the marginalisation of Christianity and against attempts to ban the wearing of crosses and crucifixes when the Home Office is fighting in the European Court to uphold exactly such a ban?

    “David Cameron is right that the values of Christianity are the values that we need’ but he needs our prayers to realise that he cannot pick and choose from the Bible or from the teachings of the Lord.  Yes, respect for property helps stop youth looting from shops.  Yes, doing unto others as you would have them do unto you helps maintain order in society.

    “But keeping a few of Christ’s commandments while breaking a raft of others is to break them all, as the Apostle James points out.

    “A little like some of the church today, Mr Cameron overdoes the love and compassion of Christ, but shies away from his laws and judgments.  But even then he is selective.  He likes being compassionate to homosexuals to the extent of overturning God’s holy institution of marriage, but he doesn’t want a lot of compassion to be shown to last summer’s rioters, or for that matter to the disabled people being made redundant by Remploy.

    “Napoleon liked religion when it maintained peace and order, and not when it challenged his assumed right to autocratic rule.  Such a convenient approach seems to be catching to leaders.

    “I repeat, David Cameron needs our prayers; and a few letters might not go amiss either.”

    JOIN CHRISTIAN VOICE TODAY:

    Prayer will humble proud Tesco

    By
    Stephen
    -
    138
    Boycott Tesco and email their Chief Executive. Remember: Every Little Helps!

    Or to put it more accurately, God will humble proud Tesco, in answer to prayer.

    As the Daily Mail has reported, retail giant Tesco have stopped sponsoring Cancer Research UK and switched their support to that annual display of aggression and depravity, London Gay Pride.  But the Bible says: When pride cometh, then cometh shame (Prov 11:2).

     

    Tesco’s idea of family – sad body-building homosexuals obessessed by looks and the male anatomy

    Mr Richard Littlejohnsaid: ‘If gays want to dress up as Carmen Miranda or mince up and down The Mall in nothing but their knickers, that’s fine by me. But why would Britain’s biggest supermarket want to be associated with such an event, at the expense of cancer victims?’ 

    And this is on top of Tesco secretly selling halal lamb and chicken to unsuspecting shoppers.

    There are five important and effective things Christians can do:

    1 Pray that God will send repentance into the Tesco boardroom, and that they will reverse their grant to gay pride..

    2 Boycott Tesco and encourage others to do the same.

    3 Mount a witness with banners and/or give leaflets out to shoppers outside Tesco’s high street stores ‘Tesco Direct’ (they can throw you out of their car park, but you have every right to witness on the street).  Contact us for leaflets.  The text of the LEAFLET is HERE

    4 Email/write to the Tesco Group Chief Executive, Philip Clark,  philip.clarke@tesco.com and their Marketing Director, Richard Brasher:  richard.brasher@tesco.com.  You can also write to their new Chairman, Sir Richard Broadbent, at New Tesco House, Delamare Rd, Cheshunt, Herts, EN8 9SL.  His email seems to be: richard.broadbent@tesco.com   (HERE is what one ex-Tesco-customer wrote.)

    5 Sign our petition ‘Boycott Tesco’.  Make sure you right-click and then open it in a new tab or window to keep this page on-screen.

     

      There are a couple of other really effective things to do as well, but we shall let Christian Voice members exclusively know about them at the proper time through our newsletter which never goes up on the web!

    Aggressive and depraved - London Gay Pride

    Tesco’s spin centres on ‘diversity’ as an ‘inclusive store’ – they even have an ‘Out at Tesco’ webpage promoting sodomy amongst their employees and a page commending staff for taking part in the 2010 parade – and ignores the fact that Gay Pride is a provocative and aggressive display of indecency and perversion.  For all their posturing, would Tesco actually like a gay pride march through one of their stores?  And if they are really interested in diversity, will they be sponsoring the ex-gay movement?  Don’t hold your breath.

    If you can bear it, here is a video link of Soho Pride, part of the London set-up in 2008.  And it that was not enough, here is a video link showing just what the gentle, tolerant gays and their supporters think of those who disagree with them with music from someone called Lily Allen.  Thanks, Anglican Mainstream.

    Tesco have denied that sponsoring gay pride was at the expense of Cancer Research, but the facts are that Tesco’s support for the annual fundraising Race for Life, the UK’s largest women-only charity event, helped Cancer Research raise more than £400million for the fight against cancer since it began in 1994.

    Tesco announced it would be a headline sponsor of Pride London just days after ending their partnership with Cancer Research.  Tesco’s Head of Research and Development, a militant anti-Christian homosexual called Nick Lansley, lobbied hard for that decision. 

    Here at Christian Voice we have a soft spot for cancer charities ever since Maggies Centres courageously turned down tainted money from the blasphemous Jerry Springer the Opera in 2006 and were rewarded by making far more from the publicity around that decision than what they would have received from the show.  Why on earth should Tesco think that dumping a cancer charity to take up with Gay Pride is a clever (even a good commercial) decision?

    The militant atheist magazine Freethinker helpfully points out that the Co-op sponsor Manchester Gay Pride (as well as throwing Christian Voice out of their bank) and that ASDA’s parent Wal-Mart give benefits to gay partners of employees in the USA.  Unless ‘Christian fundies want to starve themselves’, they chuckle, ‘they better (sic) start thinking fast of joining the grow-your-own movement’.

    Well that’s a good idea in itself, but have they forgotten Sainsbury, not to mention your local shops?  In addition, as we pointed out in our video on the supermarkets and halal, if you want to be sure of avoiding halal-slaughtered fresh meat, just shop at M&S or Morrisons.

    Some words from Proverbs and from Mary on the subject of pride to inform your prayer.  Remind the Lord of his word as you pray:

    Prov 8:13  The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.
    Prov 11:2  When pride cometh, then cometh shame: but with the lowly is wisdom.
    Prov 13:10  Only by pride cometh contention: but with the well advised is wisdom.
    Prov 14:3  In the mouth of the foolish is a rod of pride: but the lips of the wise shall preserve them.
    Prov 16:5  Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the LORD: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished.
    Prov 16:18  Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
    Prov 29:23  A man’s pride shall bring him low: but honour shall uphold the humble in spirit.

    Luke 1:49 For he that is mighty hath done to me great things; and holy is his name. 50 And his mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation. 51 He hath shewed strength with his arm; he hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. 52 He hath put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low degree.

    James 4:6  Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.

                                                                                                Join Christian Voice:

    Commonwealth ignores gay rights

    By
    Stephen
    -
    20

    Gay rights activists were left disappointed this weekend as the Commonwealth ignored their demands to legalise homosexual acts.

    The Commonwealth: Calls for gay rights fell flat

    Calls from Australia and Canada at the 2011 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Perth, Western Australia, echoing William Hague’s earlier speech to the Commonwealth People’s Forum, were opposed by African, Asian and Caribbean nations.   Only Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom have enacted full gay rights.  India’s High Court legalised sodomy and gross indecency in 2009, and South Africa has legalised homosexual activity in line with their pro-gay constitution, but both have stopped way short of the kind of measures which have seen Christians targeted by homosexual activists in the United Kingdom.

    This positive outcome is a victory for righteousness and comes after Christian Voice organised a campaign of prayer throughout the Commonwealth.  Christian Voice also exposed Michael Kirby, the Australian delegate who put down the motion to legalise unnatural acts, as an obsessive homosexual.

    We give God the glory that David Cameron was left blustering on BBC’s Andrew Marr Show that he would use foreign aid to enforce his view, but admitting that any country’s position on gay rights was just ‘one of the things that will determine our aid policy’ and recognising that ‘they are in a different place to us on this issue’, suggested by Andrew Marr as ‘some sort of bizarre Western fetish’.  You can watch the interview until 5th November 2011.

    The reality is that Britain must get rid of its overseas aid budget somewhere.  If it refuses to give aid to those African and Caribbean nations which view sodomy with disgust, it is a bit stuck.  However, in the past it has used aid ‘creatively’ to support projects aimed at softening up populations to accept immorality and feminism.

    The Department for International Development is targeting its aid to fewer countries.  Its website says: ‘Our resources and impact will be concentrated on 27 countries which account for three quarters of global maternal mortality and nearly three quarters of global malaria deaths: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Burma, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Occupied Palestinian Territories, Pakistan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Tajikistan,Tanzania, Uganda,Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe.’

    If International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell takes out all the countries which criminalise sodomy, he will be left with Burma, the Congo, India, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, South Africa and Tajikistan.  But even then, public displays of homosexuality are a cultural taboo in pretty well all of them.  Those committing homosexual acts in Congo, for example, are prosecuted under public decency laws.  So are the children of current British aid recipients going to be denied secure schooling, vaccination,  safe drinking water and improved sanitation?  Does Cameron want women to die in pregnancy and childbirth and newborn babies to die needlessly without British aid?

    Actually, African voices are beginning to voice the idea that foreign aid does more harm than good and if it is going to be attached to pro-gay strings the argument is made all the stronger.  A good argument is made that foreign aid is there to make our politicians look caring for their own political advantage.

    By a picture of a smirking Mitchell, the DfID website also says it wants to ‘help 10 million more women get access to modern family planning’.  Mitchell is one of the House of Commons’ most pro-gay and pro-abortion MPs.  As ‘modern family planning ‘ means abortion, and as the British Government is going to use foreign aid to campaign for that as well as for gay rights, these aid recipients are better off without it.

    The tyrant is dead, long live the tyrant

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0

    Jewish commentator Daniel Greenfield has posted an article about Libya on his blog.  Here are some edited highlghts with our links:

    Despot: Colonel Gadhafi with Gordon Brown

    ‘The tyrant is dead, and the head of Libya’s Transitional National Council, Mustafa Abdul-Jalil,  (who was also Gaddafi’s former Justice Minister), has declared that Libya has been liberated.

    ‘What a glorious day it is when a country is liberated from its justice minister by its justice minister. If only Gaddafi had been quicker on the ball, he could have staged a revolution against himself and liberated the country from himself.

    ‘But don’t pop the champagne corks just yet. Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, who liberated Libya from himself, has also declared that it will be governed under Islamic law and that laws which contradict Islam will be abolished.

    ‘What can the Libyan people look forward to? In Egypt, a fellow who said something about Islam on Facebook got sentenced to three years of hard labor. Egypt, lest we forget, is a moderate Muslim state. How can you tell Egypt is a moderate Muslim state? He didn’t get the death penalty, the way he would have in Pakistan.

    ‘Westerners who are always on the prowl for moderate Muslims might take caution from his example. The difference between a moderate Muslim and an immoderate one, is the difference between three years of hard labor for saying the wrong thing on Facebook… and the death penalty. Instead of searching for moderate psychopaths, we might be better off asking whether we really need psychopaths at all.

    ‘Blasphemy laws in the Muslim world are not really about cartoons of exploding turbans and the free press, those are things that don’t exist and never really existed anyway. They’re a convenient way to keep down uppity minorities. Back when there were still Jews living in the Muslim world, charges of blasphemy were a common way of depriving them of their property or their lives. Today Christians are the main target– for as long as they’re around.

    ‘The Arab Spring which overthrew a moderate Tunisian government put an end to the last vestiges of tolerance. And Islamists have already been gathering outside the synagogue in Tunis and chanting the usual cheerfully peaceful slogans about the Battle of Khaybar. Which is the Muslim equivalent of snapping a Nazi salute and yelling, “See you in Auschwitz.”

    ‘Back in Libya there is no Jewish community, and a foolishly optimistic fellow who traveled to rebuild the synagogue there was quickly told where he could shove his liberty, fraternity and equality.

    ‘The Gaddafi regime was a money-grubbing totalitarian mafia, and it will be replaced by a totalitarian money-grubbing mafia, many of whose members will be alumni of the original mafia. Whoever runs the new mafia, whether it’s a “moderate” like Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, Gaddafi’s old justice minister, who wants to abolish all laws that contradict Sharia, or an immoderate, like Abdel Hakim Belhadj, commander of the Tripoli Military Council who’s also a veteran of the local Al-Qaeda franchise.

    Happier days: Gadhafi meets Barack Hussein Obama

    ‘The death of Gaddafi does not mean a new era of human rights, only a transition to a new tyranny. The robed maniac was not the first king, sultan, bey and tyrant to be brought down by an armed mob and some foreign backed revolutionaries. This is how it has always been. The tyrant delivers his patriotic speeches, leers into the camera, alternately panders to the mob or shoots it down, and passes down power to his son.

    ‘What brought down Gaddafi, Mubarak and the rest of them was not the mythical popular awakening, but well-funded domestic revolutions with international backing and training, and international pressure backed by bombing raids.

    ‘The tyrant is dead, long live the tyrant.’

    Debunking the Palestine Lie

    By
    Robin
    -
    0

    The video below is a useful resource for debunking some of the common myths about a Palestinian state that are currently being perpetuated by the media and by America’s President Obama.

    Beckhams ‘irresponsible’ say Greens

    By
    Robin
    -
    2

    The Beckhams were happy parents when Victoria gave birth to her fourth child this summer, but not everyone was thrilled by the birth of little Harper Seven.

    In her article, ‘Beckhams a ‘bad example’ for families‘, Guardian journalist Tracy McVeigh reported that “according to a growing group of campaigners, the birth of their fourth child make the couple bad role models and environmentally irresponsible.”

    Mc.Veigh cited the UK-based Optimum Population Trust, whose chief executive, Simon Ross, linked family size to carbon emissions, saying:

    “The Beckhams, and others like London mayor Boris Johnson, are very bad role models with their large families. There’s no point in people trying to reduce their carbon emissions and then increasing them 100% by having another child.”

    Forget that Europe is approaching a demographic crisis. Forget that the birth rates in the Western world are dipping below replacement level, while the Muslim populations continue to reproduce at unprecedented rates. For the virulent voices of the population control lobby, there is only one reality worth considering and it is this: less people = less polluters.

    At least, that is what I argued in a recent article I wrote for the Charles Colson Center titled ‘Fourth Child Furor.’ In the article I explored some of the proposals that are being put forward for reducing the ‘surplus population’, including the following:

    Dr. Barry Walters, a professor of obstetrics at the University of Western Australia, came up with an idea a few years ago. He suggested that those who refuse to use contraception should be levied with a climate-change tax. In a 2007 article in the Medical Journal of Australia,Dr. Walters proposed that such a tax be assessed on all couples having more than two children. He suggested an initial fine of $5,000 for each “extra” child when born, with another $800 assessed every year thereafter. However, parents could redeem themselves by using contraceptives or undergoing sterilization procedures, for which they would receive carbon credits.

    Simon Ross, chief executive of the UK-based Optimum Population Trust, floated a similar idea in the furore over the Beckham’s fourth child.

    Such ideas are nothing new, as Salvo Magazine has shown in their article ‘Baby Freeze: Is Population Control the New Solution to Global Warming?‘ Moreover, Salvo Magazine warned, what is at stake here is a “new religion of science” that “sees mankind as the curse, and scientists as the prophets pointing out the path of redemption. Like the prophets of old, the modern scientist-prophets know that salvation can never occur without sacrifice. The sacrifice they are calling for is simple: We must become fewer and poorer. Only then will the world will be saved from the environmental Armageddon that is fast approaching as a result of ‘reckless breeding’ (a term employed by Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger).”

    The larger issue here is that radical environmentalists will stop at nothing when following through the implications of their most cherished presuppositions. This even includes an attempt to impose guilt on those who, like the Beckhams, decide to have more children than the Western average.

    Further Reading

    Beckhams a ‘bad example’ for families

    Baby Freeze: Is Population Control the New Solution to Global Warming?‘

    Social Engineering and the Dark Secret of the American Left

    Fourth Child Furor

    Bill Gates: Vaccines Can Help Decrease Surplus Population

    Rage Against the Breeders

    Sterilize the Unfit

     

    SOROS FUNDS ‘BOMB LIBYA’ POLICY

    By
    Stephen
    -
    5
    With full attribution to World Net Daily:
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=333897
     
    In their Article: Brace for another U.S.-Mideast war.  First Libya, now sources say next country warned of NATO attack. . . George Soros-funded doctrine with White House ties
     
    The Libya bombings have been widely regarded as a test of a military doctrine called Responsibility to Protect.In his address to the nation in April explaining the NATO campaign in Libya, Obama cited the doctrine as the main justification for U.S. and international airstrikes against Libya.
     

    Responsibility to Protect, or Responsibility to Act, as cited by Obama, is a set of principles, now backed by the United Nations, based on the idea that sovereignty is not a privilege but a responsibility that can be revoked if a country is accused of “war crimes,” “genocide,” “crimes against humanity” or “ethnic cleansing.”The term “war crimes” has at times been indiscriminately used by various U.N.-backed international bodies, including the International Criminal Court, or ICC, which applied it to Israeli anti-terror operations in the Gaza Strip. There has been fear the ICC could be used to prosecute U.S. troops.The Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect is the world’s leading champion of the military doctrine.

    As WND reported, Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect.

    Several of the doctrine’s main founders sit on boards with Soros.

    WND reported the committee that devised the Responsibility to Protect doctrine included Arab League Secretary General Amre Moussa as well as Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi, a staunch denier of the Holocaust who long served as the deputy of late Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat.

    Also the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy has a seat on the advisory board of the 2001 commission that originally founded Responsibility to Protect.

    The commission is called the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. It invented the term “responsibility to protect” while defining its guidelines.

    The Carr Center is a research center concerned with human rights located at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

    Samantha Power, the National Security Council special adviser to Obama on human rights, was Carr’s founding executive director and headed the institute at the time it advised in the founding of Responsibility to Protect.

    With Power’s center on the advisory board, the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty first defined the Responsibility to Protect doctrine.

    Power reportedly heavily influenced Obama in consultations leading to the decision to bomb Libya.

    Two of the global group’s advisory board members, Ramesh Thakur and Gareth Evans, are the original founders of the doctrine, with the duo even coining the term “responsibility to protect.”

    As WND reported, Soros’ Open Society Institute is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect. Also, Thakur and Evans sit on multiple boards with Soros.

    Soros’ Open Society is one of only three nongovernmental funders of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. Government sponsors include Australia, Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway, Rwanda and the U.K.

    (Note: Ask your MP – Email address HERE – to ask the appropriate Secretary of State how much money the UK has given to the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, from which budget is has come, what the grant(s) is intended to achieve and how this will be monitored.

    There is an in-depth study on the funding of Responsibility to Protect HERE and more on how Soros switched from being pro- to anti-Gadaffi  and the implications of R2P on Israel HERE)

    Board members of the group include former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, former Ireland President Mary Robinson and South African activist Desmond Tutu. Robinson and Tutu have recently made solidarity visits to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip as members of a group called The Elders, which includes former President Jimmy Carter.

    Annan once famously stated, “State sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined – not least by the forces of globalization and international co-operation. States are … instruments at the service of their peoples and not vice versa.”

    Soros: Right to ‘penetrate nation-states’

    Soros himself outlined the fundamentals of Responsibility to Protect in a 2004 Foreign Policy magazine article entitled “The People’s Sovereignty: How a New Twist on an Old Idea Can Protect the World’s Most Vulnerable Populations.”

    In the article, Soros said “true sovereignty belongs to the people, who in turn delegate it to their governments.”

    “If governments abuse the authority entrusted to them and citizens have no opportunity to correct such abuses, outside interference is justified,” Soros wrote. “By specifying that sovereignty is based on the people, the international community can penetrate nation-states’ borders to protect the rights of citizens.

    “In particular, the principle of the people’s sovereignty can help solve two modern challenges: the obstacles to delivering aid effectively to sovereign states, and the obstacles to global collective action dealing with states experiencing internal conflict.”

    More George Soros ties

    “Responsibility” founders Evans and Thakur served as co-chairmen with Vartan Gregorian, president of Carnegie Corp. charitable foundation, on the advisory board of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, which invented the term “responsibility to protect.”

    In his capacity as co-chairman, Evans also played a pivotal role in initiating the fundamental shift from sovereignty as a right to “sovereignty as responsibility.”

    Evans presented Responsibility to Protect at the July 23, 2009, United Nations General Assembly, which was convened to consider the principle.

    Thakur is a fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, which is in partnership with an economic institute founded by Soros.

    Soros is on the executive board of the International Crisis Group, a “crisis management organization” for which Evans serves as president-emeritus.

    WND previously reported how the group has been petitioning for the U.S. to normalize ties with the Muslim Brotherhood, the main opposition in Egypt, where longtime U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak was recently toppled.

    Aside from Evans and Soros, the group includes on its board Egyptian opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei, as well as other personalities who champion dialogue with Hamas, a violent offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.

    WND also reported the crisis group has petitioned for the Algerian government to cease “excessive” military activities against al-Qaida-linked groups and to allow organizations seeking to create an Islamic state to participate in the Algerian government.

    Soros’ own Open Society Institute has funded opposition groups across the Middle East and North Africa, including organizations involved in the current chaos.

    ‘One World Order’

    WND reported that doctrine founder Thakur recently advocated for a “global rebalancing” and “international redistribution” to create a “New World Order.”

    In a piece last March in the Ottawa Citizen newspaper, “Toward a new world order,” Thakur wrote, “Westerners must change lifestyles and support international redistribution.”

    He was referring to a United Nations-brokered international climate treaty in which he argued, “Developing countries must reorient growth in cleaner and greener directions.”
    In the opinion piece, Thakur then discussed recent military engagements and how the financial crisis has impacted the U.S.

    “The West’s bullying approach to developing nations won’t work anymore – global power is shifting to Asia,” he wrote.

    “A much-needed global moral rebalancing is in train,” he added.

    Thakur continued: “Westerners have lost their previous capacity to set standards and rules of behaviour for the world. Unless they recognize this reality, there is little prospect of making significant progress in deadlocked international negotiations.”

    Thakur contended “the demonstration of the limits to U.S. and NATO power in Iraq and Afghanistan has left many less fearful of ‘superior’ western power.”

     

    Show George Soros who is boss!  Join Christian Voice right now:

    HOW TO WRITE TO YOUR MP

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0
    Houses of Parliament

    These are the rules for writing any letter or email to your MP:

    1 Ask your MP to ask a question of the minister responsible.  This ensures you will get a reply.  Never write to a minister direct.  It makes your MP look redundant.  Kill two birds with one stone.
    2 Be precise.  Do not ramble.  State the matter in the first paragraph and make each point concisely.  I always try to say everything on one well-spaced page.  If you go to three pages, you have lost the game.
    3 Be patient.  Assume your MP knows nothing about the case, so explain carefully (but precisely!)
    4 Be accurate.  Do your own research or rely on a group like Christian Voice who check everything.
    5 Be legible.  If your handwriting is not up to it, type it or email and spell-check.
    6 Be calm.  No ranting and raving, no over-the-top comments, no snide remarks.
    7 Ask your MP to agree with you if the occasion arises.  This could be your question (see 1).
    8 Keep to one subject.  If two things are on your mind, write two letters, a couple of days apart.

    Letters are always written to your MP at: House of Commons, LONDON, SW1A 0AA

    Emails can also be sent.  You need to know either your MP’s name or your Parliamentary Constituency.  Both of these, together with email addresses may be found here on the Parliament website.  If you know neither your MP nor your constituency you can simply type your postcode in a box.  In fact, that is the easiest way to get staight to his/her contact details.
     

    Britain Begins 2010 as a Vasal of the EU

    By
    Robin
    -
    1

    “To the liberalism they profess, I prefer the liberties we enjoy; to the Rights of Man, the rights of Englishmen.” — Disraeli

    As Britain begins a new decade, it does so on a radically different footing. 1010 marks the beginning of Britain being a vassal state to the powerful EU.

    It began on 1 December, 2009 when the Lisbon treaty came into force, removing the remaining vestiges of British sovereignty.

    Intended as a replacement to the rejected EU constitution, the treaty transfered vast swabs of power from Parliament to Brussels . It also stripped Britain ’s right to veto new EU laws in more than 40 different policy areas.

    The treaty also granted new powers to the European Commission, European Parliament and European Court of Justice.

    Defenders of the treaty argued that it would create a more powerful Europe . By establishing the first president of Europe and a foreign minister and a diplomatic corps, the treaty paves the way for a European empire not seen since the days of Charlemagne.

    The purpose of the treaty was to streamline EU institutions, divesting local governments of decision making ability in order to achieve a greater centralization of power. The 250-plus page treaty also allows more laws to be passed by a simple majority instead of unanimous consent.

     

    LABOUR BREAKS ITS PROMISE

    In order to pass, the Lisbon treaty had to be ratified by all 27 member states. Although the treaty was rejected by Irish voters in June 2008, it received overwhelming support in a second referendum in the Irish Republic on 2 October 2009.

    The people of Britain , on the other hand, were not given the chance to vote on the treaty, despite the Labour Government having promised a referendum. Indeed, Labour won the 2005 election largely on a manifesto pledge to give the British people a referendum on the treaty.

    Tory Euro MP Daniel Hannan said: “It is appalling, demeaning, disgraceful that such a thing should have been done without popular consent and in the absence of the referendum that all three parties had promised.”

     

    LISBON TREATY IN CONTEXT

    Reprinted with permission from Soeren Kern’s article ‘ Lisbon Treaty: Europe ’s Slow-Moving Coup d’État’)

    The EU has its origins in the Treaty of Rome (1957), which gave birth to the European Economic Community (EEC). The EEC, also known as the “Common Market,” was a customs union. EEC member countries agreed to dismantle all tariff barriers over a 12-year transitional period, and over time a common tariff was also established for all products coming in from third countries.

    The Single European Act (1987) extended the scope of the EEC to include not only the free circulation of goods, but also the free movement of persons, capital and services. The Act established a genuine common market, but it also codified European Political Cooperation, which was the forerunner of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

    The fall of the Berlin Wall (1989) and the reunification of Germany (1990) led French President François Mitterrand, who feared a return of German hegemony, to search for a way to permanently anchor Germany within European institutions. Together with German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who was keen to relieve misgivings in Paris and London about a reunified Germany , Mitterrand worked to transform the whole of Europe into an all-encompassing union.

    In 1989, an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) established monetary and economic union. In 1990, another IGC was called to study the constitution of a political union. Then, in 1992, following three years of closed-door debate which ignored public demands for more transparency, the Treaty of the European Union (also known as the Treaty of Maastricht) came into being.

    The Maastricht Treaty modified the Treaty of Rome and the Single European Act by moving far beyond the limits of a common market toward political union. The Maastricht Treaty also changed the official name of the EEC to the European Union.

    The Maastricht Treaty created three pillars, one of which enables joint actions in foreign policy and military matters, and another one which enhances co-operation in the fight against crime. The Maastricht Treaty also established a European Central Bank (ECB), fixed exchange rates and introduced a single currency called the euro.

    In 1998, the Treaty of Amsterdam modified parts of the Maastricht Treaty, again with no public participation. The main change introduced by the Amsterdam Treaty was the creation of a new position called the High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy. The treaty also provided the EU with a common security policy, including the gradual formulation of a common defence policy.

    In 2001, the Treaty of Nice was designed (once again without public input) to reform the institutional structure of the EU, with a view toward eastward expansion.

    Fast forward to 2009, and the stated aim of the Lisbon Treaty is to “complete the process started by the Treaty of Amsterdam and by the Treaty of Nice with a view to enhancing the efficiency and democratic legitimacy of the Union and to improving the coherence of its action.”…

    The Lisbon Treaty is the stunning culmination of more than 50 years of European economic and political integration, a process that has resulted in the systematic erosion of democracy and democratic accountability in Europe .”

    READ: Genesis 11; Proverbs 11:21.

    PRAY: Genesis 11:6-7 shows that the confusion of the nations (and, by implication, the existence of separate nation states) is God’s way of restraining the effects of man’s fallenness. However, the Lisbon Treaty, like the entire European project, fails to reckon with the doctrine of the fall. Like the Tower of Babel , it is based on the faulty foundation that fallen man can achieve utopia by separate peoples simply working together.

    The Utopian aspirations can be seen in the way that defenders of the EU, like apologists for ancient Rome and Nazism, point out that their empire is making one new humanity out of previously warring pluralities, ushering in a new world order of peace. Moreover, they often describe the European project as the final stage in an eschatological climax triumphing over the forces of nationalism, war, self-interest and isolation in order to usher in an age of peace and prosperity. Unhampered by the reality of man’s sin and foolishness, they present a vision of eschatological progress echoing the pretensions of the Babel architects.

    Arthur Seyss-Inquart, the Austrian Minister for Security and Interior, made these utopian aspirations explicit in 1938 when he said that, “Above and beyond the concept of the nation-state, the idea of a new community will transform the living space given us all by history into a new spiritual realm. . . . The new Europe of solidarity and co-operation among all its people…will find an assured foundation and rapidly increasing prosperity once national economic barriers are removed. . . . Nations and human beings only develop to the full when they participate actively in a great common destiny.”

    Gordon Brown echoed Seyss-Inquart’s comments this Spring when he said, “I think the new world order is emerging, and with it the foundations of a new and progressive era of international co-operation.”

    Despite these utopian hopes, God promises to judge all empires built on the sand of such arrogance (Prov. 11:21). He did not spare Babel or Rome and neither will he spare the new EU superstate. God’s answer to the world’s problems is not a resurrection of Babel but Pentecost (Acts 2), in which separate people groups became united through acknowledging the Lordship of Jesus. Empires that are built on any other foundation than an explicit recognition of Christ’s Lordship will crumble.

    WRITE: in a democracy it is crucial that constituents hold their representatives accountable, especially when those representatives have lied to them. It is therefore essential that lots of citizens write to their MPs and complain about the way Government has reneged on its promise of a referendum.  Also share with your MP the words of Immanuel Kant who warned of the consequences of European integration when he said: “The idea of the law of nations presupposes the distinction between independent states. Although this is a state of war…it is still, according to reason, better than the fusion of those states by means of a hierarchy of power culminating in a universal monarchy. Laws which are passed for a large area lose their vigour, and such a soulless despotism, after it has hollowed out the kernel of goodness, ultimately collapses into anarchy.”

     

    See how to join Christian Voice by clicking below (Link does not commit you to join):

    ‘Copenhagen Must Fail’ Says Christian Group

    By
    Stephen
    -
    1

    A leading Christian lobby group has said it is calling on fellow-believers to pray against the Copenhagen Climate Change talks.

    They are also asking Christians who have been urging others to pray for an agreement to look beyond the headlines and at the plans in the UN document to set up a world government to enforce its provisions. (Link to the Copenhagen draft treaty.)

    It is the first time in an international treaty that the word ‘government’ has been used of an globalised enforcement agency

    Page 18 of the treaty proclaims, “The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following: (a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. (b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows. (c) The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include…”

    ‘COP’ stands for Conference Of the Parties. It is the highest body of the United Nations Climate Change Convention, consisting of environment ministers of the various nations. The COP will have authority to extract and distribute the funds which the richer nations will pay to the poorer, and enforce the treaty amongst all the nations, bypassing national parliaments.

    The payments to third world nations will flow through the World Bank, which establishes interest rates on loans it will issue to underdeveloped countries. The treaty discloses the World Bank’s role on page 39 and again on pages 67 and 129. With this “front” of climate change, and saving the environment, the World Bank and the small group of the bank’s private owners, will profit.

    The President of the World Bank, Robert Zoellick, openly admitted its role in a plan to eliminate national sovereignty and impose a global government during a speech on the eve of the G20 summit at the end of March. He said, “If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernizing multilateralism to empower the WTO (World Trade Organization), the IMF (International Monetary Fund), and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.”

    Last year, Henry Kissinger, who has held numerous positions in several administrations from Richard Nixon to George H. W. Bush, told an interviewer last year, “There is a need for a new world order. I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order.”

    In April, at the G20 Summit, Prime Minster Gordon Brown said, “From today we will together manage the process of globalisation.” “Today’s decisions, of course, will not immediately solve the crisis. But we have begun the process by which it will be solved,” Mr Brown said. “I think a new world order is emerging with the foundation of a new progressive era of international co-operation,”

    Christian Voice National Director Stephen Green said today:

    ‘I am all for saving energy and for the UK to lead on environmentally-friendly policies. But at the domestic level a new breed of eco-Nazis appears to be using the issue of climate change to snoop on and manipulate the people and enlarge their own empire. And internationally it is now clear that it is providing an opportunity for a fledgling world government to be set up.

    ‘The Bible, in Psalm 2 and in Revelation, speaks of a global conspiracy to set up an Antichrist New World Order. The Council of Europe brazenly used Brueghel’s painting of the building of the tower of Babel to portray the people of Europe finishing off what Nimrod failed to do after God scattered the people and confused their language. The slogan was: ‘Many Tongues, One Voice.’ The European Parliament building in Strasbourg was deliberately modelled on the tower of Babel . There is an arrogance about our present-day leaders.’

    Psalm 2 says: ‘The kings of the earth set themselves and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord and against his anointed.’ Banker David Rockefeller, the leading light behind the Bilderberg group of secretive internationalist, said in 1994: ‘All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.’

    Stephen Green continued: ‘Climate change is the perfect ‘major crisis’ which the globalist bankers have been waiting for. For them it is a money-making opportunity and a chance to impose anti-life secularist policies on third-world nations. I am not denying climate change is a major issue, ranking alongside the destruction of the Christian foundation of the western nations in its impact, but the glee with which the One-World Government advocates have jumped on it should make Christians stop and think.

    ‘There has to be a better way, and Christians need to look further than the newspaper headlines. We need to pray against an agreement which would benefit no-one but the bankers and advance the ambitions of those who want to rebuild a modern tower of Babel .’

    Charles Speaks for the Poor on GM Crops

    By
    Robin
    -
    0

    Support for the Prince of Wales has come from a Christian prayer and lobby group over the matter of GM crops.

    Charles in GM ‘disaster’ warning http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7557644.stm

    Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today:

    ‘Prince Charles’s timely intervention should be heeded. Firstly, the development and cultivation of GM crops is not about helping food supply, it is not being done for altruistic motives, it is being carried out by multi-national companies for money, and it will lead to strangulation of the means of production, putting poorer farmers out of business.

    ‘Secondly, the environmental disaster His Royal Highness predicts is as a direct result of mankind playing God, interfering in systems about which we can never have anything more than flawed and limited knowledge.

    ‘It is not enough for the Government to say that safety is their top priority. Who can trust them, especially as the employees of Monsanto and other agrochemical companies rotate around as Government advisors?

    ‘The comment from the anti-monarchy group “Republic” is the oddest response, saying “Prince Charles is quickly making his position as heir to the throne untenable with his meddling in politics.” No he isn’t, he is speaking up for respect for the complexity of our environment, against man’s arrogance, and for the world’s poor. I guess “Republic” would not understand any of that.

    ‘In the past, Christian Voice has not been slow to criticise the Prince of Wales and his sons for activities which have brought their family into disrepute. But in this matter, the more the Prince of Wales articulates what is on the hearts of ordinary people and in the heart of God, the better.’

    Met Becomes Private Security Force for Olympic Torch

    By
    Stephen
    -
    1

    Sir Ian Blair was criticised today for allowing the Metropolitan Police to become an additional private security force for the Olympic Torch procession.

    The Commissioner of the Met said in a television interview that the Metropolitan Police would ‘do everything’ to protect the Olympic Torch procession from being disrupted by demonstrators.

    Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said this afternoon:

    ‘Sir Ian Blair should not have provided the Olympic authorities with an additional free private security firm in Metropolitan Police uniforms. The Chinese security should have been increased instead of presenting Londoners with a bill for something totally outside their control.

    ‘Instead, the police should allow protests and merely keep the way clear for the procession. It should be the responsibility of the Olympic authorities to provide protection for the misguided celebrities taking part.’

    In the past, Christian Voice has protested outside the Chinese Embassy against the Chinese policy of forced abortions and the Chinese Government’s treatment of Christians. Christians who are not members of state-registered churches are, like Falun Gong followers, subjected to summary arrest, imprisonment and torture by a regime which cannot tolerate what it cannot control.

    Stephen Green said: ‘The last time we held a witness outside the Chinese Embassy, the Met had to be forced to allow it by the threat of court action. The British police should not allow themselves to be used as a private security force to save the blushes of one of the most despotic and anti-Christian regimes on God’s earth. ‘

    Join Christian Voice

    Christian Voice is a prophetic ministry in the ‘forthtelling’ sense for those Christians who are fed up with the way things are, have had enough of secularist politicians imposing wickedness on the rest of us and who are not satisfied with trying to get ‘Christian influence in a secular world’ because they know ‘The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof; the world and they that dwell therein’ (Psalm 24:1). If you want instead to lift high the Crown Rights of the King of kings, you have found the right place!

    Membership Application

    • Yes, I/we wish to join Christian Voice. (Husband and wife may join as one)
    • I/we unreservedly support the aims of Christian Voice and agree with the Statement of Faith.
    • Please send me my free copy of Britain in Sin, which lifts the lid on the unrighteous legislation of the past fifity years and its devastating social consequences, my free copy of Understanding Islam, which will tell me all I need to know about Islam, my free copy of Labelling Halal, which exposes the secret sale of Islamic meat, and the latest Christian Voice newsletter, full of confidential prayer targets, which never goes up on the web.
    • I/we agree to computer storage of all information provided, solely for the use of Christian Voice.

    Aims of Christian Voice

    • To uphold Christianity as the Faith of the United Kingdom.
    • To be a voice for Biblical values in law and public policy.
    • To defend and support traditional family life.
    • At all times to rely humbly on the blessing of Almighty God.

    Statement of Faith

    1. We believe in one creator God, eternally existent in three persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as stated in the historic creeds of the Christian church.
    2. We acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord over all creation.
    3. We believe the Holy Bible to be the inspired, infallible, written Word of God to whose precepts, given for the good of nations and individuals, all man’s laws must submit.
    4. We believe all government to be under the authority of God and that its purpose is the maintenance of freedom and justice solely in accordance with Biblical principles.

    Cost of annual membership is £20.00

    If you agree with the Aims & Statement of Faith then click the button below.

    If you wish to renew your membership please click the button below. We will match your details to our records.

    Butler-Sloss ‘Patronising and Arrogant’

    By
    Stephen
    -
    2

    The decision of Lady Butler-Sloss to dispense with the services of a jury in the Diana inquest was tonight described as ‘patronising and arrogant’ by a Christian group.

    Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said tonight:

    ‘I heard the decision with total amazement this afternoon. I found it inexplicable, incomprehensible and irrational. Looking at the reasons she has given not to have a jury, I am still amazed, but now with her arrogance and her patronising dismissal of the cranial abilities of ordinary people.

    ‘To say that a jury cannot come to a careful and fully reasoned decision betrays the contempt for the lower orders which has sadly become a characteristic of the Establishment under the present Prime Minister.

    ”A jury cannot come to a reasoned decision, she says, but of course a judge can, in particular a judge like Lady Butler-Sloss. Don’t trust the people, trust the judges, or the minister, or the man in Whitehall. In just a few words, she has put on display all that is pompous, self-serving, proud and vain in those who purport to rule us.

    ‘The reality is, there have been so many conspiracy theories circling this matter that only by trusting a jury with the facts can those theories be laid to rest. It is easy now to say that it is just the faint risk that a jury might not agree that the death of the Princess of Wales was an accident which worries Lady Butler-Sloss. From that, it is a small step to see her as an actress in an Establishment stitch-up.

    ‘Anyone would be forgiven for observing that if there is not an establishment conspiracy, her ladyship is doing her very best to make it appear as if there is one.

    ‘She did not help confidence in her impartiality by accepting so publicly the conclusions of Lord Stevens’ report. With her latest utterance, surely no trust in her can remain. And as that trust ebbs away, the frightening thing is that confidence in the law as a whole might go out with it.

    ‘Mr Al Fayed says he will seek to overturn her decision. I wish him well in that. He should also challenge the presence in the coroner’s chair of Lady Butler-Sloss. Much is at stake, not least the integrity of the law in general and the coroners’ courts in particular.’

    Road Pricing ‘Big Brother’ says Christian Voice

    By
    Stephen
    -
    0

    Government proposals to replace the road fund license and fuel duty by road pricing dependent on satellite tracking have been described as “like Orwell’s Big Brother”  by Christian Voice,  the group behind the Jerry Springer the Opera protests, which also monitors assaults on civil liberties.

    Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today:

    “Motorists are already taxed on how much they use the roads, by fuel duty.  Fuel duty also reflects the environmental impact of vehicles, highly-polluting vehicles paying more.

    “The radical solution is to ring-fence transport income and expenditure in the Department of Transport, and plough all the money raised from motoring into road improvements, and more importantly, public transport.  It should be possible at least to halve fares on trains and buses and reach an equilibrium where fuel duty is subsidising an envirogated public transport system, based on a re-nationalised rail network.  Christian Voice have already proposed such an idea, in our alternative Queen’s Speech.

    “We have a profound civil liberties issue with the Government’s proposals.  The satellite technology they depend on will track every vehicle. fitted with the spy-in-the-car black box.  Motorists will be paying for the transmitter and for the miles they drive, but the spin-off is that the Government will know where every car is at every moment.  Many of us don’t see why the Government should know where we are, and we see a similar control-freak mind-set in the pages of Orwell’s “1984”.  The Government will have data on the whereabouts of every vehicle, and we shall be financing their intrusion into our privacy.

    “We must fight this proposal, and push for an alternative which will subsidise public transport and help the environment.  Our counter-proposal does exactly that.”

    1...678Page 8 of 8
    Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube

    EVEN MORE NEWS

    POPULAR CATEGORY

    © Newsmag WordPress Theme by TagDiv