Swiss researchers have found that a dose of Moderna’s Covid jab injured the hearts of about three percent of people who received it.
There were no apparent indications of heart damage among the vaccinated individuals. However, after conducting blood tests three days following the vaccinations, researchers identified elevated levels of troponin in numerous recipients.
Troponin is a protein that the heart releases in response to injury.
‘Subclinical mRNA vaccine-associated myocardial injury is much more common than estimated based on passive surveillance,’ the researchers concluded. The paper was published in the peer-reviewed European Journal of Heart Failure.
Over 1 billion people have received mRNA jabs. The study suggests tens of millions of them may have suffered heart damage, and don’t even know they have been hurt.
The researchers conducted the tests on 777 employees at University Hospital Basel, one of Switzerland’s top medical centers, from December 2021 through February 2022.
The employees had already been scheduled to receive mRNA boosters and were asked if they would undergo a blood test for troponin levels three days later.
In other words, the researchers conducted “active surveillance” on them to trace potential side effects, as opposed to “passive surveillance” vaccine safety systems like the federal government’s VAERS, which depend on patients or doctors to report problems.
More Women at risk
The Moderna vaccinees had an average age of 37 and few preexisting heart problems. About 70 percent were women.
The researchers reported that 20 of the injured recipients were women, while only two were men. Even adjusting because more women were tested, women were almost five times as likely to have elevated troponin.
Many studies have shown that young men are at the highest risk from mRNA-caused myocarditis and pericarditis, or acute heart inflammation, following the jabs. But this study suggests women may be suffering more subtle damage. Read our related stories;
‘Vaccine widower sues AstraZeneca’ →
Covid-19 Lockdown not science-based →
Other cases
In January 2023, Christian Voice reported on COVID-19 vaccination risks, including cardiac damage, fatalities, fertility issues, and immune system impact.
Covid vaccines ‘impair immune system’ →
Our article also highlighted the effects on various antibody classes (IgG1 to IgG4).
Recently, a man took legal actions against AstraZeneca over vaccine complications that led to his wife’s death. The lawsuit alleges that the vaccine is a ‘defective product’ and ‘unsafe.’
Meanwhile, in December 2022, Andrew Bridgen (MP) called for the immediate cessation of all Covid vaccines, describing it as ‘clear and robust data of significant harms and little ongoing benefit’. He said a conspiracy of silence was preventing a wider discussion about the issue.
Covid: Scandal or Fiasco?
In November 2020, the National Audit Office compiled a report on the procurement of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The report was called ‘Investigation into government procurement during the COVID-19 pandemic’.
According to the NAO’s report, the government awarded 8,600 contracts worth £18 billion between January and July. £17.3 billion of the money went on brand new contracts. £12.3 billion of it went on PPE. Much of it went to companies owned by friends of ministers and advisors. Members of UK regulatory authorities owned shares in pharmaceutical companies. Directors of vaccine companies and the academic departments they financed rubbed shoulders with those in power. The corruption was blatant.
Isa 1:23 Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither doth the cause of the widow come unto them.
Christian Voice has consistently asserted that the practice of injecting healthy individuals with the blood of aborted fetuses remains an inappropriate response to whatever agenda the government may be promoting.
The Bible says:
Luke 5:31-32 Jesus answered and said to them, Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.
Moreover, it is even more grievous to utilise the blood of innocent children under the guise of a scientific experiment, and to make vaccines using cell lines from aborted babies, as was done.
The Bible also says,
Exodus 23:7 Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked.
Even at this time of writing (August 2023), University College London, where lockdown enthusiast (and lockdown hypocrite) Professor Neil Ferguson works on research for vaccine companies, is lying to students that Covid-19 is among ‘certain illnesses’ that ‘Students are more at risk of … than the general population.’ See UCL Vaccination page HERE. Of course the opposite is true, as even the World health Organisation admits (in an article trying hard not also to acknowledge the adverse effects of lockdowns and restrictions).
Read related stories;
Vaccine Evidence Suppressed says MP →
Neil Ferguson needs no vaccine →
Read and Pray
Thank God for more revelations about the vaccination programme
Pray for more revelations and for the whole truth to come out.
Pray for the families of those affected by these injections.
Isaiah 45:6; Psalm 14:1; Matt 10:26; Luke 16:1.
We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to support or join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
There is a lot of misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines. I apologize in advance as this is going to sound a little ranty. A lot of people do not understand what vaccines actually do to them or how their immune systems work. A lot of the accusations from the anti-vax narratives are based either on misunderstandings or lies. Why do I say that? Because in the last 3 years, I have studied the narratives and fact-checked the claims. Mostly they contain some truth that you can google for yourself and find to be true but a lot of nuance and interpretation put into the narrative is simply untrue and does not represent the source material. It is political spin. Whilst raw data might be correct, the interpretation is not. This is not surprising as most people wouldn’t have a clue about some of the basic biochemistry nor understand what data VAERS actually records. Either way, it isn’t a good thing.
Specifically, this particular study does not completely show what this article infers. Should we be worried? I would say not but I have the benefit of some medical knowledge, specifically biochemistry and also in mathematics. Sure the Swiss researchers did find elevated troponins (markers for cardiac cellular damage) for some of those staff after 3 days. That would be something to be worried about on its own. However, the conclusion of the authors is that this myocarditis is mild and transient. In medical terms, it is not permanent. After 30 days, nothing. It is also what you would expect to find from an actual infection of COVID-19 if not worse but the damage there is potentially much longer lasting. Covid also affects other organs as it is also a systemic infection. It is also far less significant than doing a long-distance run in normal circumstances such as training for a 5K run. The elevations of troponins are worse.
Here is a link to that academic paper in full
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.2978
The bottom line for me though is what this means from a public health perspective. From my reading, it was already established from the early days that Moderna seemed to be the one vaccine with the most issues. This finding would be unsurprising. We had this with Astra-Zeneca and with Pfizer. The real issue then is what health authorities do or communicate the issues. For me, that is the real tragedy. Early on, our own health minister and the corresponding health authorities were not doing enough public messaging and that is the real concern. Sure we had plenty of data and briefings but I think the majority of people engaged in self-sabotage by default. In other words, what was not in the nation’s consciousness was how to gain the most out of vaccination. The vaccine is not a magic bullet. No vaccine ever was, and no vaccine rollout like this was done during a worldwide pandemic. The conditions here would be different to every other vaccine rollout. Yet people’s understanding of this is solely from historical experience and their expectations would be misplaced. This is why COVID-19 is still knocking around and the fact that vaccinated people still get COVID-19. That makes people think that the vaccine did not do its job. They also buy into the lie that this has not been tested enough. No amount of vaccine will replace your immune system. That is still the key working component that matters. Any vaccine, including the mRNA ones, is only as effective as what your own immune system is able to do from it. If you do not try to work with it, then it is self-sabotage, especially during a pandemic. That part of the health messaging was absent. People got vaccinated and then went back to normal life as they thought they could. There was never any major advice imploring lifestyle changes. Nobody said you should eat healthier foods to fully nourish your immune system, sleep more to give your body less stress, and actively try to de-stress because most of us are in that routine. Or to specifically mitigate to avoid exposure. Each one of these impacts our immune system’s ability to fire on all cylinders. There is no nefarious issue with the vaccines. They do what they were supposed to do not what most people thought it would do. With respect to testing, each of them has been fully tested to the same degree as previous vaccines within a year but you would need to understand some pharmacology and the biochemistry of vaccines to fully appreciate how that is possible as opposed to several years. That is why this negative narrative exists and I think it is wrong.
I frequently read and write on Quora (social media). One of the people I follow and vice versa is David Moore. He is an Australian doctor who wrote a much longer but clear explanation laden with more medical jargon. He refers to the same Swiss study I did.
https://qr.ae/py67Nb
In it, he includes a YouTube video of Dr. John Campbell, an academic nurse who teaches anatomy. He has been quite influential in COVID-related studies online. David explains the detail of why there is no alarm from this Swiss study. From John, the takeaway is that for those who get vaccinated, it is imperative advice to people to take it easy for the next 7 days. Again, it is this kind of messaging that is important but lacking.
That is all well and good, but how do you explain the sheer numbers or young people dying from myocarditis or being seriously injured from the mRNA vaccines? The ‘vaccines’ might have had their field testing now, but there was none when they were first rolled out was there? And was that not why they were not licensed as normal medicines are?
What were the health benefits to young people at little risk from Covid from being administered, dragooned into, having a vaccine that did them no earthly good? Why was there so much public propaganda to pushing vaccines onto these age-groups? What were the financial benefits to vaccine manufacturers from that policy? Why were people with shares in pharma companies sitting on the regulatory authorities?
Burundi had next to no Covid vaccination. What have been the health outcomes there?
I replied to your response last week. Did you get it?
It went into the spam folder. Just taken a look. It seems very long. Perhaps shorten it and stay on topic?
Sorry, but my original reply was to the point and on topic. I responded to your questions thoroughly citing where the evidence can be found and that is one reason why it was long. It was a reasoned argument. There is no way to shorten this without reducing the issue to being a frivolous one because the issue demands it. I am deeply convinced that the amount of misinformation implied is deep and wide. Thus I was compelled to write a full answer. A lot of people have asked these exact same questions and when they are not answered fully, they get spun into some form of grand global conspiracy. Trying to respond to any one or more elements in this fabricated ecosystem is pointless when the whole worldview is fundamentally wrong. I get the impression that you have already predetermined that my response is erroneous because it does not conform to your chosen existing narratives that you have been pushing for a while. I know my thoughts were not exactly welcome. I am not surprised given the amount of misinformation that exists today in society in general that has fed into this narrative. If you want a rewrite a short answer then it would be disingenuous of me to even try.