Farage exposes Soros plotters

Financier George Soros has one third of MEPs in his pocket, according to a book exposed by Nigel Farage.

Financier George Soros has one third of MEPs in his pocket, according to a book exposed by Nigel Farage.

Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Prominent UK Brexiteer Nigel Farage has condemned financier George Soros using MEPs to advance his own agenda during a speech in the EU Parliament, according to RT.

Hungarian leader Viktor Orban previously bore the anti-Soros torch.  Soros himself is Hungarian and Jewish.  But the wealthy financier fiercly opposes the State of Israel.  Mr Farage is going one step further than Mr Orban.  He seeks to investigate fellow EU MEPs who support the globalist anti-Christian vision of Soros.

MP’s in league with Soros’s Open Society

Nigel Farage speaking in the European Parliament

Nigel Farage speaking in the European Parliament

In a speech in Strasbourg last week, Mr Farage took aim at UK MP Ben Bradshaw (Labour).  The latter was indecently quick to pick up on allegations of collusion between the Brexit Leave campaign and Russia.

‘Just last week, the electoral commission, in the UK, launched an investigation to find out whether the “Leave” campaign took offshore money or Russian money,’ Farage said.

‘This came about as a result of questions asked in the House of Commons by one Ben Bradshaw, somebody linked to an organization called Open Society.’

Mr Bradshaw’s entry in the register of parliamentary interests reveals a reference to the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung organisation.  This is linked to Open Society.  Mr Bradshaw also mentions Humboldt University, also receiving Soros money.  Mr Bradshaw is not the only one.  Open Society paid for a £2,713 trip to Washington USA for his colleague David Lammy in September this year. Liberal Democrat Nick Clegg secured a £21,000 grant for a favourite charity from Open Society Institute. This article carries more on on ‘the Soros web’.

Verhofstadt working against Hungary PM

Pro-Soros: Guy Verhofstadt MEP

Pro-Soros: Guy Verhofstadt MEP

Mr Farage went on to provide an example of an EU parliamentarian working on behalf of George Soros.  This time it was against Hungarian PM Viktor Orban.  Mr Orban has accused the financier of seeking to create ‘a Europe of mixed population.’  And Mr Farage had the chief anti-Brexit coordinator for the European Parliament in his sights:

‘We even had last week Mr. [Guy] Verhofstadt lobbying on behalf of Mr. Soros at the Conference of Presidents in a battle that is going on with Viktor Orban, the prime minister of Hungary,’ Mr Farage said, pointing directly at Verhofstadt as he spoke.

‘I wonder, Mr Farage continued, ‘when we are talking about “political collusion,” I wonder if we are looking in the wrong place.’

Nigel Farage described Soros’s influence in Strasbourg and Brussels as ‘truly extraordinary.’  And his influence will only increase.  Soros has donated the bulk of his wealth – $18 billion – into his pet Open Society project.

Mr Farage concluded his short, fiery monologue with a weighty statement: ‘I fear we could be looking at the biggest level of international, political collusion in history.’

Soros helped destablise Syria and Ukraine

Soros agents flooded syrian refugee camps with leaflets urging them to seek asylum in the EU

Soros agents flooded syrian refugee camps with leaflets urging them to seek asylum in the EU

The Apostle Paul confirms Satan is working in men like Soros when he writes:

Eph 2:2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

Open Society Institute and Open Society Foundation campaigns for open borders and supranational structures.  It is all for the Revived Roman Empire of the European Union. Working with local agitators, its activists destablised both Syria and Ukraine.

This led directly to civil war, loss of life and destruction of property and livelihoods in both. The Syria crisis led to a flood of refugees across Europe.  This was in part because Soros agents were flooding the country and local refugee camps with leaflets explaining how to be granted asylum in EU countries.

Soros behind Merkel ‘Wilkommen’ policy

RT observes: ‘Thanks to the advocacy work of the Migration Policy Institute and the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), both Soros-sponsored organizations, the mass resettlement of Muslims from the Middle East and North Africa into Europe became the norm.’

Prov 16:12 It is an abomination to kings to commit wickedness: for the throne is established by righteousness.

And then Soros had his tame parliamentarians agitating for the fullest possible welcome to migrants.  He knows the bulk of them are Muslim.  In addition, he knows their attitudes are inimical to Western Christian culture and democracy.  Moreover, he is aware that some were sleeper terrorists. Soros organisations are said to have encouraged Angela Merkel’s ‘Willkommen’ plan.  The financier subsequently blamed her for implementing it too quickly.  But elsewhere, Soros argued for 500,000 migrants to come to the EU a year.

In this report of his speech, Mr Farage said: ‘Open Society boast that they had 42 meetings last year with the European Commission.’

Moreover, Soros organizations published a 177-page booklet providing details of 226 reliable ‘friends’ who serve in the European Parliament.   soroskooptbrussel   Mr Farage said he would call on the parliament to set up a special committee to investigate the issue. The booklet is called ‘Mapping: Reliable Allies in the European Parliament (2014-2019).’ It is an extraordinary display of arrogance which has revealed the entire Soros EU Parliament network:

Mark 4:22 For there is nothing hid, which shall not be manifested; neither was any thing kept secret, but that it should come abroad.

Soros has one third of all MEPs

George Soros getting on well with Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission

George Soros getting on well with Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission

According to the booklet, ‘The presence of an MEP in this mapping indicates that they are likely to support Open Society’s work.’ There are 751 members of the European Parliament. ‘Reliable allies’ of George Soros hold at least one-third of seats.

Firstly, the book details which supportive MEPs serve on which EU committee.  Secondly, it lists each of the 226 MEP’s according to country.  Thirdly, it labels and analyses them according to their political orientation and views. For example, the booklet describes Conservative MEP Charles Tannock both as ‘moderately Eurosceptic, but a potentially strong Open Society ally.’ His colleagues Timothy Kirkhope, Karim Sajjad, Kay Swinburne and Anthea McIntyre are all ‘moderately Eurosceptic, but a potential Open Society ally.’

Labour’s Claude Moraes ‘may appear easy to win over, but will require extensive engagement to ensure commitments are followed up effectively.’   His colleague Linda McAvan is apparently interested in ‘climate and the environment; public health; pharmaceuticals; gender equality; international trade; international development; and relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific countries.’

Agitating in Africa

Ms McAvan serves on the EU Delegation to African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (ACP).  She sits alongside fellow UK MEP’s Seb Dance (Labour) and Catherine Bearder.  Ms Bearder is the only remaining Liberal Democrat in the European Parliament.. All are strongly pro-sodomy, indeed Seb Dance, like Ben Bradshaw, is openly homosexual.

Their presence on the ACP committee will suit Open Society very well. In addition to campaigning for unrestricted migration and world empires Soros organisations also promote gay rights around the globe. They have a particular emphasis on overturning anti-sodomy laws in African countries. Very few African nations do not unwittingly have a subversive Open Society office in their capital city.

Anti-Russian

Yana Toom MEP. The Russian-speaking Estonian 'may be pro-Russian'. And for George Soros, that would never do.

Yana Toom MEP. The Russian-speaking Estonian ‘may be pro-Russian’. And for George Soros, that would never do.

But then, most of the 226 Soros MEP puppets will support LGBTI, the EU project and open borders. However, an anti-Russia stance also helps inclusion in the list.  One MEP, Estonia’s Yana Toom, is strangely included despite this damning verdict: ‘Refused supporting the European Parliament’s first resolution on the Ukraine-Russia conflict in July 2014, and may be pro-Russia to an unknown extent (and, in that case, not necessarily an Open Society ally).’.

RT says: ‘For anyone who questions whether Open Society works directly against Russian interests, that single line should dispel all doubts. Moreover, it provides some background as to why Russia in 2015 banned Open Society from operating on its territory due to the threat it posed to the country’s “constitutional order.”‘ African and Caribbean countries would do well to follow Russia’s lead.

Prov 25:5 Take away the wicked from before the king, and his throne shall be established in righteousness.

The Lord will have the last laugh

Eighteen billion dollars is a lot of money with which to promote the destruction of borders and Christian morality. And all we have is prayer, the word of God and the Holy Spirit. But on reflection, that should be enough:

Psalm 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision

Share

21 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. When we are wrestling against principalities. this sounds as though it could be Liechtenstein, Monaco, and Wales, but by extension other bigger modern countries too. It is probably less confusing to use the Revised English Bible translation: “cosmic powers”, unlikely although that somehow seems.

    When Christian Voice gets its information from “RT”, it may not be irrelevant to point out that in this case that is Russia Today, not the Radio Times.

    Syria and North Africa were in the Roman Empire. Why are they not to be included in the Revised Roman Empire ? I don’t think there is any parallel in antiquity of Syrians and Mauretanians being encouraged to emigrate to Germania, most of which was only fleetingly controlled by Rome if at all. It’s true that suitable men from such provinces joined the very mobile army and served on the frontiers, their main function often being to keep the Germanic tribes out of the Roman Empire, actually.

    You could argue (without knowing the exact numbers) that the Roman Catholic Church has control of a majority of European MPs, a line which Ian Paisley tended to take. The European Parliament has tended to take neither him nor Nigel Farage very seriously. Perhaps it should. But in any assembly, even the General Synod of the Church of England, there are always going to be factions leaning one way or another. It is to be expected, for example, that like almost all European countries, the European Parliament will work out with a majority on the “left” or a majority on the “right”, yet these are not the only ways of dividing people’s attitudes to policies (for example, you could be very concerned about the environment or not; very anxious to avoid wars, or not; very inclined to give aid to developing countries, or not: of course, you could be very pro EU or not too).

    “Between 2004 and 2014, McAvan served on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. In 2009, she drafted the European Parliament’s report on monitoring medicine safety.[7] She also sat on the Temporary Committee on Climate Change between 2007 and 2009; in this capacity, she was part of the Parliament’s delegations to the 2008 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Poznań[8]and to the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.” Wikipedia.

    In fact most of the information in this sinister booklet doesn’t seem to be secret at all.

    1. 1 Principalties is essentially spiritual rulers.
      2 You have a problem with Russia Today as a bona fide source of real news?!
      3 Revived Roman Empire. Don’t think the EU do not harbour such ambitions.
      4 No, RC church has little or no control over MEPs. Otherwise, neat point.
      5 Well, it sure is no secret who is in it now!

      1. 1). In that case, “principalities” was a really bad word for the translators of the Authorised Version to use. There were lots of principalities in Europe in the early 17th century, and even in the 19th century many more than now. Most confusing !

        2) I think we all have. Some are more trusting than others, cf “I just know that Mr Poon was telling me the truth.”

        3) In that case, they will have to include Turkey, especially Constantinople, but they don’t seem very enthusiastic about doing that. Boris Johnson thought it was a good idea, before he became a Brexiteer and the Foreign Secretary.

        4) Thank you.
        But I don’t suppose RC MEPs would vote for abortion. (Nor would Ian Paisley, of course).

        5) It’s easier to find out about them in Wikipedia or on their own websites than to get hold of the secret booklet with similar information .

        1. 2 Some of us don’t trust the mainstream media, actually.
          4 Not a given. Plenty of RC MPs have voted for abortion in the past. More than have voted against.
          5 Ah, but the booklet tells you which of them Mr Soros believes he has in his pocket.

  2. The Christian West is crumbling, under attack from our two Ancient Enemies – Permissive Sodom and the aggressive brother Cain/Ishmael/Islam. Terror stalks our towns and cities like never before because of Quisling traitors who practice craven appeasement to aggressive Islam. The traitors are the MEP’s, MPs’ and BBC staff bought with Soros’ filthy lucre. They conceal the truth that the flood of opportunistic migrants from the middle-east is refueling Muslim Fundamentalism and fanning it to flames within the Islamic populations of Europe. Meanwhile the young and Left-Wing are misguidedly drawn into the Soros vanguard to hysterically protest against ‘BTR’ or Brexit, Trump and Russia. Yet ironically it is Liberal Women, young people and children – especially girls, who will pay the highest price in the coming Islamic Apocalypse.

    1. absolutely correct Steve xx

    2. Have you any evidence of Soros paying BBC staff to distort the news, or is it just something that you’ve made up ?

  3. It’s a good use of Scripture to expose the truth about George Soros thanks to Nigel Farage not being afraid to say it as it is.

    There is so much corruption and evil plotting going on with so many of corrupt minds who want to have power and control over the majority.

    I’m totally opposed to Islam and believe our government should stand firm against this evil cult which is not a religion by any stretch of the imagination. There is ONLY ONE TRUE FAITH, ONE GOD, ONE LORD, ONE BAPTISM and it’s the true religion we read and learn about in the BIBLE. It is ONLY FAITHFUL CHRISTIANS that will contend earnestly for the faith. GOD has chosen the foolish to confound those who think they are wise in their own eyes but in fact, GOD calls the so-called wise of this world fools for not believing in His Son whom He sent to die for all those who believe and put their trust in Him.

    1. Why is Islam not a religion ?
      What about Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, and the Graeco-Roman classical belief in the Olympian gods ? Would you deny that these are religions too ?

      What would you say to a Muslim who denies that Christianity is a true religion because God is one God and alone, he has no partner and he has no son ? He would tell you that this is written in the Koran. He would insist that God is a spiritual entity not interested in begetting children with the help of mortal women, like Jupiter used to do.

      1. اتَّخَذُواْ أَحْبَارَهُمْ وَرُهْبَانَهُمْ أَرْبَابًا مِّن دُونِ اللّهِ وَالْمَسِيحَ ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ وَمَا أُمِرُواْ إِلاَّ لِيَعْبُدُواْ إِلَـهًا وَاحِدًا لاَّ إِلَـهَ إِلاَّ
        هُوَ سُبْحَانَهُ عَمَّا يُشْرِكُونَ

        They have taken their rabbis and their monks-as well as the Christ, son of Mary-for their lords beside God, although they had been bidden to worship none but the One God, save whom there is no deity: the One who is utterly remote, in His limitless glory, from anything to which they may ascribe a share in His divinity!
        Koran, At-Tauba. 9:31

        Isn’t there something convincing about this, or at least sincere ? It seems very much like a religious statement to me.

        1. Well of course it is a religious statement, and it has sadly convinced millions.
          It shows Islam is completely opposed to Christianity.
          Allah denies the divinity of Jesus Christ in the Quran whereas Almighty God affirms and celebrates it in the Bible.
          This does not deny that Islam is a political system as well as being a religion, or even while masquerading as a religion.

            • Rocks
            • Rox G on 27 November 2017 at 17:23

            Islam completely opposed to Christianity just as Christianity is completely opposed to everybody else !
            “There is ONLY ONE TRUE FAITH, ONE GOD, ONE LORD, ONE BAPTISM and it’s the true religion we read and learn about in the BIBLE.”

            I don’t think it’s surprising if 9:31 has appealed to millions of people. It is essentially a criticism of the excesses of Orthodox or Catholic Christianity. Some of these people do appear to be worshipping Mary, to the extent that very many Muslims believe that Father, Mother, and Son are the three persons of the Holy Trinity.

            There is something quite protestant about 9.31, and insofar as it makes clear that God is not an old man sitting on a cloud (hence no pictures of him allowed) but something totally different and remote, it is Bishop of Woolwichy.
            I reckon that if there had been plenty of evangelising Muslims around in England in the 1960s, they would have made a lot of white converts with this approach.

            • Stephen
            • Stephen on 28 November 2017 at 16:58
              Author

            Muslims are making converts today because they appeal to our desire for order and rules and modesty and a rhythm of prayer and a faith which impacts the whole of life. These are all present in Christianity but not always to the fore.
            But no, it is not remotely Protestant to deny the Son! Mohammed was exposed to heretical Christians apparently or he somehow came away with the idea that Mary was part of the Trinity. But in any case, his family’s business was looking after the shrine of the Arabian Moon-god, Allah, who would definitely not have anything or anyone else worshiped alongside him. Well, apart from his daughters, the three high-flying cranes, Illat, Manat and Uzzah (See: the Satanic Verses). But to admit Jesus Christ was divine and the Son of God, Allah is not going there for sure.

            • Rocks
            • Rox G on 1 December 2017 at 02:56

            I haven’t noticed any widespread desire for modesty in society today, and we seem notably relaxed about keeping to rules compared to how it used to be in the not so distant past. If you want to rebel about that , and wear more formal clothes and keep to some rules, there are more obvious ways of doing it than becoming a Muslim (you could join the Army, for example, or even become a monk).

            I wrote nothing about Protestants denying the Son ! It is very Protestant not to worship (or specially revere) the Virgin Mary, however, in fact it is one of the most obvious differences between Protestantism and Roman Catholicism, now that Latin has been dropped. A distaste for Mary is crucial to Muslims, so it is no coincidence that a rather comic video retweeted by Trump shows very serious bearded Muslims lecturing about it and then dropping a big china statue of that Lady, which duly breaks. One wouldn’t have thought that American WASPs would be particularly offended by that, actually, but Trump is not well known for rationally thinking things out.

            It is often related that the original Kaaba (it has been rebuilt) was a shared place of worship like the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, a safe place for keeping the separate idols of the various nomadic tribes which could visit it in Mecca only when in the area, each for its own quite different worship. The care of the place was entrusted to particular Meccans, just as the care of the Holy Sepulchre is entrusted to particular (Muslim) Palestinians. In the end, one form of worship of a uniform God was achieved in Mecca (but not yet in Jerusalem).

            It’s worth visiting St-Dunstans-in-the-West (near St Paul’s) to experience a whiff of the same thing — an Anglican church which makes room for the distinctive trappings of a Romanian Orthodox congregation as well as for its own people.

            • Stephen
            • Stephen on 1 December 2017 at 07:32
              Author

            OK, for those who desire modesty & discipline it appeals. And that annoys me, because all that is in the Christianity of the Celtic Saints, in fact in the Church down to our own age until very recently when the world has been forcing its way in.
            Good point about the Kaaba. It was apparently Mohammed’s family who looked after the idols of Allah. His father was Abdullah (servant of Allah), so it was a family business. You can understand the other families in Mecca being grossed off by being told Allah would be the only one from now on. So obviously there had to be a bit of a skirmish about it. But business is business…

  4. I certainly don’t believe mainstream media (fake news) the Illuminati. one world order people control it I think. We are in the days of Noah & Lot. Evil men & impostors will grow worse & worse deceiving & being deceived in the end times. Jesus could come for His Bride any time. He told us to watch & pray! Our only sure guide is the Word of God. Ezekiel 38 could come to pass very soon. Apparently Israel bombed some armament place in Syria a couple of days ago. Iran, Russia & Turkey are on the Lebanese borders. Israel are on high alert & are expecting some backlash from Iran

  5. Isaiah 8:11- 14 (NET Bible. I’m not that keen on the version but in this case it seems to make the meaning plainer than some others) says:

    11 Indeed this is what the Lord told me. He took hold of me firmly and warned me not to act like these people:
    12 
    “Do not say, ‘Conspiracy,’ every time these people say the word.
    Don’t be afraid of what scares them; don’t be terrified.
    13 
    You must recognize the authority of the Lord who commands armies.
    He is the one you must respect;
    he is the one you must fear.
    14 
    He will become a sanctuary,
    but a stone that makes a person trip,
    and a rock that makes one stumble—…

    I take it to mean that although we may be aware (and may need to be) of conspiracies, we are to keep our eyes on the Lord.

    1. Verse 14 is very different in the Revised English Bible.
      ” He will become a snare, an obstacle, and a rock against which the two houses of Israel will strike and stumble, a trap and a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.”

      This seems to be quite specific to the near future as anticipated at the time it was written. If you are going to apply it to the present time, you need to interpret what is meant by “the two houses of Israel”. It could make sense if it were to mean the Jews and the Palestinians, but honestly, “the two houses of Israel” is an odd way to describe them at the time of Isaiah, which would necessarily have been misunderstood for many centuries.

      It goes on, at 9.1 :
      “… Formerly the lands of Zebuhun and Naphtali were lightly regarded, but afterwards honour was bestowed on Galilee of the Nations on the road between Jordan to the sea”,
      So what do we make of that ?

      1. The two houses of Israel in the context are the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah. Zebuhun and Naphtali are Galilee.

        1. Yes, I agree completely with you, Stephen. So what is the relevance of this now ?

          Also, “conspiracy” is a very subjective or even pejorative word, with “conspiracy theories” fashionable at the moment. The Revised English Bible, no doubt after much consideration and debate, has “alliance”. In English usage, the “Allies” are always the goodies !

          Eurosceptics, now called Brexiteers, might like to point to the Authorised Version, which uses the word “confederacy”. This sounds like a convincing warning (depending exactly how you read it), bult really, you might as well have insisted that it was referring to the Confederates in the American Civil War.

            • Stephen
            • Stephen on 25 November 2017 at 16:22
              Author

            All Jeannette P said was we need to be aware of conspiracies.

Leave a Reply