
British girls are having their genitals mutilated in barbaric Islamic practices while the UK media and public remain in a state of denial.
Denial of the truth about Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) can be seen in the failure to prosecute the perpetrators of these atrocities and in the media’s reluctance to acknowledge the Islamic basis behind these crimes.
A typical example of this type of denial was the report last month in the Guardian about FGM parties being held in the UK. The article did not even mention Islam, even though it is clear that the practice of FGM is religiously motivated. By failing to recognize the religious context of FGM, the British authorities fighting the problem are doing so with one hand tied behind their back.
Although the full extent of the problem is unknown due to the hidden nature of the crime, the NHS has estimated that “over 20,000 girls under the age of 15 are at risk of female genital mutilation (FGM) in the UK each year, and that 66,000 women in the UK are living with the consequences of FGM.” It has also been reported that the UK has the highest rates of FGM for all of Europe, even though the hideous practice was outlawed in 1985.
In an effort to halt the problem, the Department of Education mailed information to every school in the country giving guidance on how to spot and respond to potential FGM. It was revealed on 22 May that nearly half of the head teachers in London schools have failed to read official guidelines on how to prevent the practice.
Data obtained by the Evening Standard in a Freedom of Information request show that only 56 percent of head teachers even opened the email after it was sent by Education Secretary Michael Gove in April. These new guidelines help teachers identify which girls in their schools are at risk of mutilation or have already suffered from it.
The same data shows that only 45 percent “clicked through” to actually read the guidelines. This means that 1,724 London schools essentially ignored the effort to prevent abuse. 1,534 head teachers opened the email, but only 1,198 actually read it by “clicking through.”
These reports sparked further concern from campaigners and MPs that schools are not taking proper measures to protect vulnerable girls from mutilation.
It is uncertain why the UK has such a high FGM rate. One factor is that the young girls who are FGM victims are unable to protect themselves. FGM is rarely reported because family members are often the ones ordering it. A 4-year-old girl cannot or will not call the authorities and testify against her family. In addition, girls do not know how to bring up the issue even if they wanted to. Female sexuality is something not often spoken about in communities that practice FGM.
But probably the primary reason FGM is so prevalent in Britain is because of mass immigration of Muslims in the last several years. Most of the countries from which these people immigrate are African countries where FGM is a cultural and religious practice. According to a UNICEF report, Muslims are the primary religious group that practices FGM, and many women believe that it is a religious requirement to have FGM performed on them.
Another key factor may have to do with the way multiculturalism has caused British leaders to ignore crimes perpetrated by British Muslims. In many new reports addressing FGM in Britain, any reference to Islam is carefully avoided, even though the practice was unheard of in Britain until the immigration of Muslims to the country.
Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)
Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.








Ah, the religion of peace again.
Still, they make such a wonderful contribution to this country, don’t they?
If this is your stance on female circumcision, I would be interested to hear your views on male circumcision – especially given that too is religiously based.
These are completely different. What you call ‘female circumcision’ is not circumcision at all (the word means ‘cut around’) but excision of those parts of the intimate female anatomy which assist female sexual pleasure.
But male circumcision is still done on grounds of religion and still involves the mutilation of the male genitals. It seems inconsistent to decry one, but not the other.
Jane, most people can tell the difference.
There are significant health benefits including reduced risk of penis cancer from male circumcision especially in hot countries where water for personal hygeine is scarce.
There are zero health benefits and serious dangers from FGM.
These medical facts can be readily checked.
IIt is unreasonable to seek to make the 2 procedures equivalent.
But both involve cutting off bits of the genitals, for reasons of religious belief. I don’t see how it is possible to decry one, whilst supporting the other.
FGM is done to limit or eliminate conjugal pleasure. Circumcision of the foreskin has no such effect or intention and has health benefits. This discussion has gone as far as it can.
The apostle Paul, inspired by The Holy Spirit, wrote lots of good stuff which has always applied. In Romans, chapter 1 verse 28: “Since they thought it foolish to acknowledge God, he abandoned them to their foolish thinking and let them do things that should never be done”. This verse applies to the UK, Australia, the US, Canada and the European Union countries. Some of these countries, notably Holland & France are just starting to wake up to the insidious onslaught of Islamification by stealth. Islamists have long noted our turning away from our Creator and are gleefully filling the void with their minority racket counterfeit religion. God has abandoned us to our foolish thinking of ignoring the truth. We have for exchanged the truth for a lie by embracing the self destructive values of appeasement through political correctness. We foolishly think that this is the essence of democracy. Islamists see it as an open, unguarded door.
Not sure what is worse – this FGM performed by others or the self-mutilation or ‘self-harm’ that is reaching dreadful levels in our atheistical schools.
“FGM is a social/cultural custom, not a religious practice. It is common in Egypt and in other countries of Northern Africa. It is usually performed on pre-pubescent girls, often without anesthetic or precaution against infection. In those countries where the mutilation is common, it is generally practiced by persons of all religions: Muslims, Christians, followers of Native religions, etc.”
http://www.religioustolerance.org/fem_cirm3.htm
Of course it is not “so prevalent” in Britain, but some Muslim girls are sent abroad for it, which is difficult to control. This is something which in fact the Guardian has vigorously campaigned against !
The practice is not ubiquitous amongst Muslims, but is almost unknown even in Algeria and Morocco. It is illegal in most European countries and in 20 of the 50 American states.
In Eritrea, more than 80% of Christian women have it done, according to UNICEF.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_female_genital_mutilation_by_country
Rox@
It is agreed FGM is generally held to be a cultural practice, but only in the Islamic faith, taken to be a bone fide religion, is it deemed eternally “religiously “acceptable, as the “prophet” of Islam, the role model for mankind, condoned its practice.
Muslim women therefore are forever to be violated, unlike Christian women who do not.
I think FGM is pretty prevalent in Kenya – a nominally Christian country.
Well, it isn’t.
What, nominally Christian ? Tell that to the people I met there!
Don’t try to be smart. You had a sentence with a verb in it. The verb was ‘is’. I replied that it isn’t.
The amended sentence will read ‘FGM isn’t pretty prevalent in Kenya – a nominally Christian country’.
And Kenya is a lot more than ‘nominally’ Christian.
Only 30% of Christian women in Kenya, 50% of Muslim women, so I suppose not really too prevalent by East African standards. Most of them have almost everything cut off, though, and some tribal peoples do over 90% of their females.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_female_genital_mutilation_by_country
FGM exists in Kenya, a Christian country. I don’t know why you have a problem with either of these facts. Or is it simply that it doesn’t fit in with your anti Muslim view of the world, which is why you won’t publish my comment?
FGM resides in Kenya mainly in Muslim and Animist peoples. All the surveys show it is declining, thank God.
Stephen knows his stuff!!