Theresa May to meet Donald Trump

Theresa May addresses the Republican Party
Theresa May addresses the Republican Party

Today the Rt Hon Theresa May MP becomes the first world leader to meet President Donald Trump. The media is obsessed with their probable discussions on trade. The UK exports more to the US than we buy from them, so it could get tricky.

But trade deals often focus on tariffs or the lifting of them and movement of people. Let us say again, nations do not need ‘trade deals’ to trade. The UK and US are already trading. And there are such things as strategic industries. This Bible article shows they need protecting!

Yesterday, Theresa May thrilled the Republican Convention with her vision of a trading and military UK-US partnership. Commentators say Mrs May’s speech to the Republicans generally went down well with them.  (We have excepts from it here together with a link to the full text on the Downing Street website.)  But will her views go down well with the new President?

Putin still the bogey-man

Despite Mr Trump’s favourable noises towards President Putin, Mrs May cast the Russian Federation leader as a bogey-man, speaking of the anxieties of Baltic states and describing the return of Crimea to Russia as ‘illegal’. Reunification with Russia was backed by 95% of Crimea’s population. But she also talked about engaging and building relationships with Russia, ‘from a position of strength’.

 HMS St Albans (foreground), escorting Russian Warships Petr Velikiy (centre) and the Admiral Kuznetsov (background), as they pass through the English Channel on their way back to Russia

HMS St Albans (foreground), escorting Russian Warships Petr Velikiy (centre) and the Admiral Kuznetsov (background), as they pass through the English Channel on their way back to Russia

On Wednesday UK Defence Secretary Michael Fallon went out of his way to insult Russia. He described their aircraft carrier as a ‘ship of shame’ as it sailed through the English Channel. The UK does not have an operational aircraft carrier. Mr Fallon said the British navy was keeping a ‘close eye on the Admiral Kuznetsov as it skulks back to Russia.’ He described the vessel a ‘ship of shame whose mission has only extended the suffering of the Syrian people.’

Actually, the carrier helped liberate eastern Aleppo from jihadists. Russian planes supporting the Syrian army allowed Christians there to celebrate Christmas for the first time in five years. Peace talks have been taking place between the Syrian government and the armed opposition. That has only happened because of Russian involvement.

The UK is nowhere in Syria any more, thank God.  Mr Fallon could not exude any ‘position of strength’. He came across as weak, petulant, rude and divorced from reality. Can he long survive in Mrs May’s relationship-building world?

Or were hers just words? For how much longer will the generals and arms manufacturers continue NATO’s sabre-rattling on Russia’s borders? In her speech, Mrs May actually boasted that 800 British soldiers were taking part in that latest exercise.

Upholding our values?

Moving on, what did Theresa May mean when she said the US and UK must ‘project our values around the world’?
‘Responsibility to Protect’, invented by George Soros, was used in the past by the UK and US to destabilise leaders the globalist elite do not like. Its outcome in Egypt was to sweep Islamist parties into power. Libya has become a lawless staging post for people smuggling into Europe. Syria has been ruined. And in every case, thriving Christian families have been all but driven from their ancient ancestral bases.

Tam Dalyell, who died yesterday, opposed the war in Iraq
Tam Dalyell, who died yesterday, opposed the war in Iraq

In 2003 Theresa May voted for Tony Blair’s stampede into war in Iraq. The result of that is 268,000 violent deaths to date, according to Iraq body count.  It led to a complete breakdown of Saddam’s institutions of civil society, and Islamic State terrorism.

Thank God President Trump has put ‘America first’. The days of ‘fantasist Americans who want to control the world,’ appear to be over. Those words were spoken by the late ex-MP and ‘Father of the House’ Tam Dalyell, who died yesterday. His obituary is worth reading.

Christian Voice is calling on the UK Government to help rebuild Syria after the chaos they caused supporting the armed opposition.   Please sign our petition to that effect.

Mrs May said: ‘The days of Britain and America intervening in sovereign countries in an attempt to remake the world in our own image are over’. Let us pray ‘Responsibility to Protect’ is dead.

How Theresa May changed on gay rights

Or did Theresa May mean exporting the ‘British values’ of feminism, abortion and sodomy?  Here it gets interesting. Theresa May used to be adamantly opposed to gay rights.

Orwellian: Dame Louise Casey was appointed by Theresa May
Orwellian: Dame Louise Casey was appointed by Theresa May

She voted against homosexual men having access to 16-year-old boys in 1999. In 2002 she voted against gays and lesbians adopting. In 2008 she voted for an IVF baby to have a father and a mother. The next year she voted in the Equality Bill debates for churches to be free to hire and fire who they wanted.

But in 2010 Mrs May was appointed Home Secretary and Minister for Women and Equality by Prime Minister David Cameron. From that date it all changed. In 2013 she turned out to vote for gay marriage in the Marriage Same-Sex Couples Bill. She voted for Cameron’s flagship bill at both second and third reading.

Even today, her Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson is a well-known gay rights advocate. She appointed the ‘out’ lesbian Justine Greening to be in charge of Education. Mrs May gave Louise Casey an equalities watch and bestowed on her a Damehood. This month ‘Dame Louise’ invoked an Orwellian vision of using thought police against Christians in public life.

Can Trump – May project righteousness?

Donald Trump; can the US ‘project' righteousness?
Donald Trump; can the US ‘project’ righteousness?

Donald Trump has already defunded Planned Parenthood and other ‘reproductive rights’ advocates. The LGBT page has disappeared from the White House website.  Read about the feminist reaction to that here.

But Theresa May will need to drain her own gay-friendly establishment swamp before she can be a true partner to President Trump. Can she change?

Cameron & Obama exported evil around the world. This video shows how they attempted to brow-beat African nations into legalising sodomy.

Let us pray that May & Trump will have an opposite agenda and promote or ‘project’ righteousness. But as Mrs May did not mention God, let alone ‘the Lord’, or Jesus, once in her speech, this will need particularly fervent prayer.

European Union Integration

On the European Union, there were signs that Mrs May still does not understand that a wind of change, perhaps even a Holy-Spirit-driven wind of change, is blowing across the world.

She said ‘the most important institution is – and should always be – the nation state’. That’s a God-given. But then she said:

Europa on the Bull outside the Council of Ministers building in Brussels; the peoples of Europe are being taken for a ride.
Europa on the Bull outside the Council of Ministers building in Brussels; the peoples of Europe are being taken for a ride.

‘Which is why if the countries of the European Union wish to integrate further, my view is that they should be free to do so. Because that is what they choose.’

What? The EU was from its inception a bureaucrat-inspired super-national monstrosity. It was never ‘putting power in the hands of the people’ as Mrs May said was the example to the world of America. The EU was designed in secret by politicians as a revived Roman Empire.

It is always elites who want to come together like that. And when they do, people will feel ‘left behind by the forces of globalisation’ as Mrs May rightly said. The ordinary people of Europe will never choose further integration.  Even as it is the European Union is going to fall. that is what happens to ‘earth’s proud empires.’

Mrs May must grasp that the UK does not need European countries to be in an EU for the UK to trade with them.

Torture

President Trump has spoken approvingly of the use of the practice of ‘waterboarding’ to gain intelligence.  It was banned by President Obama.  On its own this shows the folly of putting trust in princes rather than God.

Christ's crucifixion brought mankind redemption. But it is not a good example for Christian states to follow.
Christ’s crucifixion brought mankind redemption. But it is not a good example for Christian states to follow.

There is no example in the Bible of the apparatus of the state using torture or ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ to extract information from prisoners. In 1st Samuel chapter 30 a captive Egyptian is brought before David. The king interrogates him, first having fed him. The captive divulges the information with no threat being used, only a promise of safety. (The UK could learn from that in the matter of interpreters.)

The most graphic Biblical example of torture is actually that employed by the Romans to execute our Lord. It is not a good example to follow. The Roman Empire was pagan. It acknowledged neither the Almighty nor his authority as King of kings. It was ignorant of his creation ordinance that mankind is made in the image of God.  Other human beings, in Christian theology, are worthy of respect.

Mrs May said ‘As Churchill put it, we “speak the same language, kneel at the same altars and, to a very large extent, pursue the same ideals”.’ Do we indeed worship the same God? Sadly, Mrs May failed to mention the Most High in her speech, not even asking the Almighty to bless America. But if we do, he requires a higher standard of us than our Islamic enemies.

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION

Please click here and sign our petition to Boris Johnson to help rebuild Syria – after the destruction we have caused it’s the least the UK can do.

Proverbs 25:5 Take away the wicked from before the king, and his throne shall be established in righteousness. 

Isaiah 2:4 And he (the LORD) shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. 

Christians threatened by Casey’s British values

Dame Louise Casey is determined to use British values against Christians
Dame Louise Casey is determined to use British values against Christians

A senior Government advisor, Dame Louise Casey, has said Christians in public life should not be allowed to hold traditional Christian views on marriage.

Speaking to MPs on the Communities and Local Government Select Committee, Dame Louise said: ‘it is not okay for Catholic schools to be homophobic and anti-gay marriage. … it is not how we bring children up in this country. It is often veiled as religious conservatism, and I have a problem with the expression “religious conservatism”, because often it can be anti-equalities. We have got to be careful that people can choose, obviously, to live the lives that they want to live, but that they cannot condemn others for living differently.’

‘like arguing with an alcoholic’

Philip Egan
Philip Egan

Catholic Bishop Philip Egan (Portsmouth) said any restrictions on Catholic schools passing on the Church’s moral teachings would be worthy of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. The bishop said it was increasingly difficult to engage in reasonable discussion and argument over anything to do with sexuality.

Trying to preach sexual morality in Britain has become ‘like arguing with an alcoholic‘, he said. ‘After a while, they won’t argue with you on grounds of reason, they just become furious and respond that way. There is something in our culture increasingly like that.’

Although Dame Lousie singled out Catholic schools, there are many Christians and other religious groups to whom her sentiments would apply.

Oath of ‘British values’

‘The Casey Review: a review into opportunity and integration’ was set up by Theresa May in July 2015.  It was ‘a review into opportunity and integration in some of our most isolated communities’.

Theresa May appointed Louise Casey
Theresa May appointed Louise Casey

Dame Louise was formerly at Shelter, the Home Office Anti-social Behaviour Unit and the ‘Respect Task Force’ according to a Government webpage.

She was made a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (DBE) in the Queen’s Birthday Honours 2016 for ‘services to families and vulnerable people’.

In her review she calls for immigrants and public servants to take an ‘oath of British values’.

Her report proposed that migrants should swear an “oath of integration with British values and society” before they become British citizens.

‘Tolerance, democracy and respect’

Communities Secretary Sajid Javid MP
Communities Secretary Sajid Javid MP

Similarly, both Dame Louise and Sajid Javid MP, the Communities Secretary, are calling for civil servants and all in public office to swear an ‘oath enshrining British values.’ These are specified as ‘tolerance, democracy and respect’.

If a public official were to violate such an oath, they could be excluded from public office. A teacher would have to stop teaching. Even a nurse might have to quit.

Ofsted would be sure to police such a regime meticulously. Schools in the public system already have a statutory duty to promote homosexuality and transgenderism under the Equalities Act. Having an oath of office would intensify the pressure on every individual teacher.

Intolerant mindset

But looking deeper into the attitudes of Dame Louise reveals an intolerant mindset.  It is one probably owned by many people in government, officialdom and the media.

Firstly, she says one ‘cannot condemn others for living differently’. Well, we can. We call it ‘preaching conviction of sin.’ In Human Rights language it’s called ‘freedom of expression.’ And funnily enough, the Government does it, in campaigns against smoking and obesity. Ordinary people do it whenever they warn a friend about taking drugs.

Homosexual men take a cocktail of HIV medications
Homosexual men take a cocktail of expensive HIV medications on the NHS

But those have an impact on public health and the costs of the NHS! So does homosexuality. Currently, 50% of sexually transmitted diseases in the UK arise as a consequence of men having sex with men.

Even the BBC says rates among gay man are ‘soaring.’

Homosexual men are the main reservoir of rectal gonorrhea (no surprises there). There also lead the field in syphilis. The anti-retrovirals gay men take to stop HIV developing into full-blown AIDS (HAART) cost £320,000 per patient over a twenty-year period.

The only way homosexual men benefit the public purse, apart from taxes, which we all pay, is by dying younger than the average.  By doing so they reduce the demand on pensions. Sorry, but public health economics is not a pretty subject.

Whose children are they?

Secondly, ‘to be homophobic and anti-gay marriage … is not how we bring children up in this country’. Well, excuse me, but whose children are they? Dame Louise has the statist idea that the nation’s children belong to the Government.

They don’t. They belong to the nation’s families. And some of those families are liberal in their views while some are conservative. Some families are lazy.  Others are industrious. Some are rough and some cultured. Some wouldn’t know a spiritual aspect of life if it bit them. Others are deeply religious. It’s called ‘diversity’ in its truest sense. And when a nation’s government pontificates that it is ‘not okay’ for parents and teachers to convey to children that marriage is an ordinance of God between one man and one woman for life, you are living in a society with a death-wish.

Not to accept ‘British values’ becomes a thought crime

Thirdly, government appears to be moving towards a position where what people do in their destructive lifestyles is not just tolerated but celebrated and encouraged.  Meanwhile, what people think is condemned. Well did the bishop remind us of George Orwell and his prophetic book ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’.  In it, the state takes reprisals against society’s dissidents who commit ‘thought crimes’.

We are not allowed to ‘condemn others for living differently’, but the Government will condemn us for thinking differently. You do not secure ‘societal cohesion and unity’ by forcing law-abiding people to act against their conscience. Instead, you store up resentment and anger. Tolerance has to tolerate intolerance. Homosexuality is on such shaky intellectual ground it cannot allow freedom of religion and freedom of conscience.

A “British values” oath will sever our nation from its Christian roots. In doing so, politicians will saw off the very branch of our heritage they are sitting on.

Job 42:2 I know that thou canst do every thing, and that no thought can be withholden from thee.

2Cor 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

Who’s on the UK women’s march?

Anti-Trump women on the UK 'women's march' outside the US Embassy in London. But where are the placards from?
Anti-Trump women on the UK ‘women’s march’ outside the US Embassy in London. But where are the placards from?

Who is behind the anti-Trump women’s march going on in London today?

The placards in the picture from the BBC’s report give the game away.

Two groups have organised the affair.

Firstly, the ‘No to Racism’ placards are from ‘Stand up to Racism’.  That is a Socialist Workers’ Party offshoot.

It was formed when the SWP brand went toxic in 2013 after two women accused a senior member of rape.

As the Guardian reports, ‘Weyman Bennett, one of two co-conveners of Stand Up to Racism, … is a longstanding member of the SWP’.  For the record, the other, Sabby Dhalu, apparently comes from the National Assembly Against Racism, an organisation associated with the Trotskyist Social Action.

Well, you might expect those two to be opposed to the policies of Donald Trump.  And anyone vaguely to the right of Leon Trotsky, to be frank.

Why have Stop the War joined?

Stop the War cannot see that Trump is a man of peace. It's Hillary they should have worried about.
Stop the War cannot see that Trump is a man of peace. It’s Hillary they should have worried about.

But what of the black placards which say, ‘No to Trump, No to War’?  Those are captioned www.stopwar.org.uk which is the Stop the War Coalition.  Yes, do click on it, or click here for a list of articles.

Stop the War’s articles are highly critical of President Obama’s pro-war policies, US and UK destabilisation of Iraq, Libya and Syria and NATO sabre-rattling in Europe.  Look at this article on the Christian Voice website in which we deplored the NATO build-up and celebrated the 2013 vote in the UK Parliament which stopped airstrikes against President Assad’s forces.  Now look at this one on the same subject on Stop the War. You will not find a hair’s breadth of difference between them.

So why are we in this ministry praising God for President Trump’s election and his ‘America-first’ inauguration speech?  Because he says he is going to seek peace with Russia and stop interfering (let alone starting wars) in other sovereign states.

If Hillary Clinton had been elected, she would have given the green light to every war-mongering hawk, neo-con and interventionist in both the Pentagon and the US State Department.  She was the WW3 candidiate, Trump is the man of peace.  Why do Stop the War not get that?  Stay with us!  All will be revealed.

Militant 'wimmin' on the women's march
Militant ‘wimmin’ on the women’s march

Feminists on the ‘women’s march”

OK, others on the ‘women’s march’ are just die-hard feminists, and they do have a point.  You would expect Donald Trump not to subscribe to the feminist dogma that men and women are from competing tribes, continually squabbling over the division of a cake of a given size.

And within minutes of President Trump’s inauguration, the White House LGBT page had vanished, along with its climate change page.  De-funding Planned Parenthood is imminent.

'Stop the War' is pro-Islam
‘Stop the War’ is pro-Islam

And, horror of horrors, Trump quoted the Bible in his speech!  So expect a few lesbians, abortionists, atheists and earth-worshiping witches to trot along as well.  (The US version of the march actually banned anyone pro-life.)

But Stop the War marching against someone patently anti-war?  Why?  Because they are ‘for Palestine’ and ‘against Islamophobia’, that’s why.  Stop the War is hopelessly pro-Muslim.  They have a disgraceful article on their website claiming the inhabitants of Mosul actually welcomed the Islamic State takeover in 2014.  They do not even agree with fighting Islamic State or Muslim terrorists.

So that is why they hate an American President whose only pledge on military action is to destroy Islamic State. And on that note, Stop the War, we’ll have to differ.

Micah 4:3 And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

NATO rattles its sabre in Europe

US tanks being offloaded at Bermerhaven
US tanks being offloaded at Brermerhaven

According to reports in the Daily Express, the Independent and RT among others, the US has just landed the biggest shipment of military equipment since the Cold War at Bremerhaven in Germany as part of a NATO build-up.

The Express said hundreds of tanks had been off-loaded at the port and are now trundling across Europe to Poland.

The Indy ventured: ‘Some 3,500 troops from the 4th Infantry Division in Fort Carson, Colorado, will join up with the equipment, which includes 87 tanks and 144 Bradley fighting vehicles, over the next two weeks.’

NATO exercise on Russian border

The military build-up is part of a NATO sabre-rattling exercise to be held later this month on the Russian border.

The MainStreamMedia line is typified by what has been written in the Daily Express: The exercise ‘comes amid growing fears that war-hungry Russian president Vladimir Putin could trigger an all-out global conflict’.

In reality, the President of the Russian Federation is far too pragmatic to fall into the trap.  Witness his refusal to respond when President Obama expelled 35 Russian diplomats in the row over ‘the hack that never was‘.  Western diplomats are well aware that Russia is only interested in defending its own people, spheres of influence, bases and allies.  They must know Mr Putin has little ambition to recover old Soviet Union assets.

in his book '1984' George Orwell, written in 1948, predicted that empire-building governments would engineer a continual state of war.
in his book ‘1984’ (written in 1948) George Orwell predicted that empire-building governments would engineer a continual state of war.

What is the real reason?

So what might be the real reason for the military build-up?  These ideas may not be mutually-exclusive:

1 President Obama, in the short time he has left,  is trying to ‘poison the well’ of relations between President Putin and President-elect Trump.  He gambles that Trump will not wish to appear ‘weak’ by bringing all the kit back home and that therefore Putin will remain in a cross mood.

2 The myth of a ‘war-hungry’ President Putin is useful for NATO chiefs and their pals in the armaments industry in order to keep up defence spending.

3 Some military people have not yet adjusted to the end of the Cold War.

4 George Orwell’s prediction that governments would use wars and rumours of wars in order to distract the population from focusing on domestic problems is coming true in our lifetime.

5 President Obama is incandescent at the Syrian Government’s recovery of eastern Aleppo, the strengthening of President Assad’s position and the vanishing likelihood of ‘regime change’ in Syria.

Still annoyed: John Kerry
John Kerry, still annoyed by the House of Commons

John Kerry still irritated by UK vote

To bolster the last idea, outgoing US Secretary of State John Kerry last week expressed irritation at the vote in the House of Commons in 2013 against military action in Syria.  He blamed it for President Obama’s lack of action against President Assad and the latter’s subsequent military successes.

Mr Kerry said: “Now, we were marching towards that time when, lo and behold… Prime Minister David Cameron went to the parliament… and he sought a vote for approval for him to join in the action that we were going to engage in. And guess what, the parliament voted no, they shot him down.”

Mr Kerry described how MPs’ 285 to 272 vote against joining American-led airstrikes led to the demands from the US Congress for its own vote on action.  It is good to be reminded of how great an answer to prayer was that historic vote in August 2013.  The link above shows how your MP voted.

Please sign our petition

Please sign our PETITION calling on the UK Government to help rebuild Syria.  It’s the least they can do after the destruction they help unleash.

 

Can you offer another reason for the NATO exercise?  Please leave a comment below!

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Gender Neutral Pronouns at Oxford

_87038297_prounous_practice976A Student body is urging the use of ‘gender neutral pronouns’ at Oxford University, reports the Oxford Mail.

The National Union of Students is apparently behind the move, which will see ‘he’ and ‘she’ replaced with the silly gender-neutral ‘ze’.

But the ‘ze’ pronoun will only be used if the person requests it.  It is unlikely to be preferred by ‘transgender’ students, if there are any, since these are determined to use the sex-specific pronoun of their gender of choice.

_87038301_yellowcard624
Pronoun card from the University of Milwaukee. You are meant to put the appropriate pronouns in from the respective columns.

Indeed, deliberately using the wrong pronoun for a transgender person is an offence under Oxford’s behaviour code, the newspaper has said.

Instead, ‘ze’ will be used by those who decide they are neither male nor female.  Those who are genuinely neither male nor female, or possess conflicting sexual organs, are know as ‘intersex’.

This condition is rare, but it afflicts the South African runner Caster Semenya, who has decided to identify, and run, as a woman despite having internal testes.  There is at present no ‘ze’ gender classification at the Olympics.  Athletes are male, or female.

Christian Voice was first with ‘Gender Neutral Pronouns’

Christian Voice first reported on this matter two months ago, so Oxford University and the Oxford Mail are somewhat behind the times.  In an article in our October Newsletter, ‘Brighton Bell’ wrote:

‘At the University of Sussex in Brighton, students from the school of History, Art History, and Philosophy were sent an email with regards to pronouns. More precisely, the use of ‘gender neutral’ and ‘gender non-binary’ pronouns.

‘The email states that it has come to the attention of the university that a number of students don’t wish to be referred to by ‘traditional’ pronouns such as he or she, but instead prefer gender neutral pronouns such as they and their.

‘It goes on to say that students should notify the university if they wish to be addressed by such pronouns by their lecturers or fellow students. It may be tempting to put this down to an isolated incident at a radical university, but as we shall see in this article, this issue has become increasingly widespread.

‘Before looking at how widespread the debate over the use of pronouns is, let us first consider how the issue came to be in the first place.

MASCULINITY IS ‘TOXIC’

‘The ‘traditional’ view that there are two genders is going out of fashion among today’s young people. Especially in academic circles, people are taught to accept that gender is not a binary.  Instead of there being two genders, an endless number of genders exist. Many students today are taught that gender is not an immutable characteristic, but instead merely a social construct. The term for this is the ‘gender non-binary’.  People identify as new ‘non-binary genders’ which most outside the hallowed halls have never heard of before.

‘Feminists have for a long time been seeking to blur the lines between male and female, especially with reference to attacking masculinity. Masculinity is denounced as ‘toxic’, and feminists argue that men who act like men are expected to act are wrong to do so. Changing gender from a binary of male and female to a spectrum in which one can choose from a menu of options is one way in which to attack maleness. If you can convince people, and especially men, not to identify with the gender they were born with, it will lead to a decline in masculinity.

‘Effectively, feminists seek to make the heterosexual male a dying breed, as it were.

400 GENDER OPTIONS

‘So, just how many new genders are there? According to a recent count on the website Tumblr, which is the home of the online feminist, there are over 400 gender options now to choose from. From the more popular ‘genderqueer’ and ‘genderfluid’, to far more obscure options, all are to be accepted without question, unless one wishes to be called ‘transphobic’ or ‘transmisogynist’.

From someone called 'sykochica' on a website entitled 'steemit.com'. The comments show how seriously the contributors take this issue. The leading comment says: ’The perfectly binary gender is a social construct, not a biological construct ’ to which 'sykochica' replies: ‘I completely agree.’
From someone called ‘sykochica’ on a website entitled ‘steemit.com’. The comments show how seriously the contributors take this issue. The leading comment says: ’The perfectly binary gender is a social construct, not a biological construct ’ to which ‘sykochica’ replies: ‘I completely agree.’

‘These options aren’t mutually exclusive either, so one can choose to identify with more than one of these new ‘genders’. Let’s take a look at a couple of these new ‘genders’ to see just how ridiculous they are (the definitions are from ‘Tumblr’):

‘Abimegender: “A gender which is profound, deep, and infinite”.

‘Genderflora: “A gender that blooms and evolves depending on the weather and atmosphere; similar to genderfluid but more plant-like”.

‘Polygender: “Identifying as multiple genders; may be static or fluid”.

‘In addition to the above terms, a word has even been invented for normal people who identify with the gender they were born with – cisgender. Society is said to be ‘cisnormative’, meaning that those who identify with trans and non-binary genders are an oppressed group.

‘It’s interesting to note how proponents of the gender non-binary see gender as a fluid, social construct one can choose whilst simultaneously seeing sexuality as immutable and unchangeable; something one is born with and cannot choose.

BLURRING LINE BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE

‘Universities across the UK and America are now accepting the new gender theory as if it were proven fact. This has resulted in an increasing number of students identifying with a gender other than male or female.  It has also raised the issue of by which pronouns they would like to be addressed. In addition to gender neutral pronouns such as ‘they, them, and their’, completely new pronouns are now also being made up to protect these poor students’ feelings. For example, the pronouns ‘ze, zie, and xe’ are just three of the many sets of pronouns one can now choose as an identity. The more that the gender binary can be deconstructed in these ways, the more the lines will blur between male and female.

‘How widespread is the issue of pronouns? It’s difficult to know just how many universities are implementing new policies on them, but there are certainly a number of examples of universities doing just that. This certainly isn’t an issue confined to the University of Sussex.

CHOOSE YOUR OWN PRONOUNS

‘For example, the University of Michigan in the USA have recently implemented a new policy to allow students to choose their own preferred pronouns. These pronouns must be respected by professors and fellow students on threat of disciplinary action. In a rather amusing twist, one student who found the policy to be ridiculous decided to change his pronoun to ‘his majesty’ in an effort to highlight just how insane the policy is.

‘At American University in Washington DC, students in an induction session were asked to introduce themselves by their name and preferred pronouns.

‘Meanwhile, at the University of Vermont, students are allowed to change their pronouns on the university’s computer system, having the choice between ‘he’, ‘she’, ‘they’, and ‘ze’, along with ‘name only’ if they wish to have no pronoun at all.

‘PUTTING PRONOUNS ON THE CARDS’

‘Back home here in the UK, our very own National Union of Students seems to have a serious problem with the use of pronouns. Last year, the NUS LGBT committee submitted a motion to the NUS women’s conference called ‘putting pronouns on the cards’. The motion complained that as current name badges used at conferences only state the person’s name and educational institute they attend.  That was discriminatory as non-binary students then have to also write their pronouns on these badges so they are addressed correctly. Apparently, having to write a pronoun on a name badge can make one feel ‘uncomfortable, othered, or outed as trans’. The solution the NUS women’s conference came to is that all students will now be asked their preferred pronouns when registering for conference.  These pronouns will then be printed on all name badges.

‘Interestingly, the NUS women’s conference also declares that it is open to “all who self-define as women, including those with complex gender identities which include ‘woman’, and those who experience oppression as women.”

‘BORN IN THE WRONG SPECIES’ IS NEXT

‘As you can see, the issue of gender is now at the forefront of what is going on in the academic world, and is a new battleground which must be fought. We cannot allow for traditional genders and gender roles to be eroded further in the name of ‘progress’ or political correctness. First it was sexuality, now it’s gender. What next? A ‘trans-species’ movement? Sadly, that is an idea also starting to gain some momentum.  A number of people now not only believe they were born with the wrong gender, but they were also born in the wrong species.

‘Of course, all this ignores the clear words of scripture:

‘Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

‘1Corinthians 14:33a: God is not the author of confusion.

‘Indeed, God is not the author of confusion, and he created a binary of genders which are not social constructs.  They are ordained by God himself. So the confusion of genders and blurring of gender lines has not come from God but from the world. It is a corrupting influence on today’s youth and society as a whole. Along with the blurring of gender lines comes an increase in experimenting with different sexuality, and the ever growing embrace of homosexuality as an acceptable, alternative lifestyle.

‘PRAY for Christian young people at university. It takes courage to oppose the militants and faith to persevere. Pastors and parents should be aware of this issue in order to be able to pray with and support our young people.’

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Irresponsible BBC promoting transgenderism

Victoria Derbyshire interviewing 'Jason' and her mother Leanne
Victoria Derbyshire interviewing ‘Jason’ and her mother Leanne

Hard on the heels of ‘I am Leo‘ and its ‘Just a Girl‘ series, the BBC’s ‘Victoria Derbyshire Programme’ has joined its irresponsible campaign to promote transgenderism among primary school children.

The morning TV show is today telling the story of ‘Jason’, a girl who wants to be a boy.

VIDEO CLIP

In a video clip on a BBC webpage the child says: ‘I felt like a boy trapped in a girl’s body and it just really didn’t feel right, it was horrible.’

Miss Derbyshire asks: ‘What do you remember about when you were treated as a girl and had a girl’s name?’

The child answers: ‘Well I was treated like any other, anyone else was but I just didn’t feel like the same as everyone else so I felt different and I felt that I was a boy and I am a boy. I came home, I think as, pretty much every day I came home sort of crying because I didn’t know how to explain it. If I was to carry on living as a girl I don’t think I could do it I just I probably wouldn’t, I wouldn’t let anyone see me, I probably wouldn’t come out of my room.’

‘Jason’s’ mother Leanne tells Victoria Derbyshire she and her husband fully support Jason’s wish to be a boy. She says: ‘I think it’s really hard for a parent or anybody on the outside looking in to understand that they are trapped in the wrong body and that is how they feel and it’s like torture for them every day.’

‘WRONG BODY’ MANTRA WITH NHS TREATMENT

Leuprorelin is marketed under the brand name Lupron
Leuprorelin costs £1000 per monthly injection and is available on the NHS

What we see is the popular ‘trapped in the wrong body’ mantra coupled with emotional blackmail.

Disturbingly, we learn that 120 children who identify as being transgender have had NHS treatment to pause their puberty over the last five years and that ‘Jason’ ‘is one of the youngest.

She is now having monthly injections of hormone blockers, which effectively and temporarily halt the progress of puberty.

In ‘Just a Girl’, aimed at children 6-12, the fictional ‘Amy’ wears girl’s clothes and explains to viewers that he was born as a boy, Ben. He too is already in the process of halting puberty by drugs.

The treatment costs the taxpayer something like £1000 per month and the NHS even produced a ‘Guide to Hormone Therapy for Trans People’. The Guide makes clear that in addition to the hormone blockers, a child will need to take regular injections of the hormone appropriate to their ‘chosen’ gender.

This will obviously lower fertility, and if the patient embarks on surgery to have either testicles or ovaries removed, infertility will be permanent. ‘Jason’ and ‘Amy’ will not have children, and ‘Jason’s’ mother Leane will not have the joy of grandchildren from her.

Frank Godwin's representation of Treasure Island's Long John Silver
Frank Godwin’s representation of Treasure Island’s Long John Silver

PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENT

If someone really and truly believed he was Long John Silver, would the NHS chop off his leg and buy him a parrot? No, his doctor would refer him to a psychiatrist.

Medicine is there to cure, not to harm. Hormones, let alone surgery, are undertaken with the intent of impairing or destroying a natural bodily function. That is contrary to medicine.

A more mature society would deal with the underlying psychological and emotional problem, with the aim of making the child feel at home in the body the good Lord gave him or her. Indeed, the problem could even be spiritual.

The extent to which transgenderism is now becoming fashionable, aided in the UK by our state broadcaster, promoted by materials on the NHS website, means many more small children will fall for it year by year, trotting out the ‘trapped in the wrong body’ line.

Bob McCoskie of New Zealand’s ‘Family First’ reports that ‘the overwhelming majority of such children – from 75 to 98 percent – who experience gender dysphoria grow out of it by the time they reach puberty. … The leading clinics seeing such children – such as those in Canada and the Netherlands – do not recommend parents and schools facilitate gender changes in such children for various reasons. The push in culture today to embrace and affirm such children’s wishes is founded more upon a political ideology than it is in careful science and experience.’

It may be argued that political ideology is bent on societal and individual self-destruction.

Leading clinicians working in the Netherlands report ‘the results unequivocally showed that gender dysphoria remitted after puberty in the vast majority of children.’ They refer to this switch back to the child’s natal gender as “desisting”. Thus, most such children are indeed not ‘transgender’. The Amsterdam Gender Identity Clinic, one of the largest clinics in Europe treating gender dysphoric children, does not recommend that parents, teachers, or clinicians facilitate pre-adolescent sex transitioning, cross-dressing or name-changing.

Children find it hard to reverse the momentum that was created for them by well-intentioned but enabling adults.

Rupert Everett. 'After I was 15, I never wanted to be a woman again'.
Rupert Everett. ‘After I was 15, I never wanted to be a woman again’.

STATE-SPONSORED CHILD ABUSE

Going along with such a child’s apparent wishes to adopt the opposite gender could mar them for life and could be seen as state-sponsored child abuse.

British actor Rupert Everett has also warned parents and clinicians against encouraging children who believe they should be the opposite sex. Speaking from his own experience as a boy, Everett, who is homosexual, said, ‘I really wanted to be a girl. Thank God the world of now wasn’t then, because I’d be on hormones and I’d be a woman. After I was 15, I never wanted to be a woman again.’

Schools going along with transgenderism in the liberal West really ought to carry out a full risk-assessment if they are encouraging immature children into life-changing decisions they will regret later.

Schools and parents should ask themselves:

How will any amount of ‘transitioning’ change the child’s chromosonal and genetic structure?
How will a male to female child produce eggs or a female to male child sperm?
How do they know the child wil not afterwards regret the ‘transition’ and sue?

WE ARE MARRING GOD’S IMAGE OF MALE AND FEMALE

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Psalm 100:3 Know ye that the LORD he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.

Proverbs 14:12 (&16:25) There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

Matthew 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Pray for Donald Trump

Donald Trump
Donald Trump

The Bible tells us to pray for our leaders, but there is an urgent need to pray for Donald Trump, especially as he embarks on his ‘Thank You’ tour with all the security challenges that presents.

TRUMP IS NOT YET ‘PRESIDENT-ELECT’

Despite the generous words of President Obama, Donald Trump is not yet, at this time of writing, the ‘President-Elect’ of the United States.

He will only become President-Elect when the fifty US electoral colleges have met, in their own states, on 19th December 2016 and that when the President of the US Senate counts up the votes, 270 or more state electors have voted for him.

Each elector has two votes, one for President, one for Vice-President.  Remember, ‘faithless’ electors (those who do not ‘keep faith’ with the state’s electorate) could change the outcome.

What would happen were Donald Trump to become President-Elect but be assassinated after 19th December and before his swearing in?  His running mate, Mike Pence, having been elected Vice-President-Elect, would become President on 20th January.

Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton

But what would happen were Donald Trump to be assassinated before 19th December?  Then, as I understand it, the electors would be free to vote for whomsoever they wished.  Mike Pence might be elected.  But so might the runner-up, Hillary Clinton.

CHANCES OF ASSASSINATION

A Mrs Clinton Presidency would be a green light to the Neo-Conservatives, hawks and interventionists in the State Department and the Pentagon to bomb far-away places and increase NATO aggression against the Russian Federation.  It would also be bad news for Israel, and great news for abortionists, gay rights groups and those who paint transsexual signs on toilets.  Her judicial appointments to the Supreme Court would entrench the antichrist agenda, and the effects of all that would undoubtedly be felt this side of the Atlantic and across the world.

Ronald Reagan survived an assassination attempt in 1981
Ronald Reagan survived an assassination attempt in 1981

There is a lot of money and ideology at stake and we should be under no illusion about that.  There are dark forces already at work trying to undermine Mr Trump.  An assassination attempt on him is not beyond the bounds of reason.  Joe Tex says the chances are:

‘about 1 in 4 that he will be killed, injured or narrowly escape an assassination attempt. There is a 90% chance that at least one attempt will be made, since one attempt has been made on 9 of the last 10 Presidents.’

Before the election, we prayed for a Trump rather than a Clinton victory on grounds of world peace. There is far less chance of tensions building up between the US and Russia, although we must still pray hard.against the warmongers.

HOPE FOR WORLD PEACE

By working with Russia, President Trump will also be the best hope for peace and for Christians and Christianity in the Middle East.  It was President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair who were responsible for the ‘war on terror’ in Afghanistan, which began in 2001. The same two took their countries into war on false pretences against Saddam Hussain in Iraq in 2003, causing hundreds of thousands of deaths and sowing the seeds of Islamic State.

Even on President Obama’s watch, the US, the UK, under David Cameron, and France threw Libya into chaos in 2011 and the same year, with the help of funding from financier and agitator George Soros, destabilised Syria, bringing about today’s refugee crisis across Europe.  The civil war in Syria saw jihadists Al Nusra Front and Islamic State finally become established.  This BBC timeline video is helpful.

Mike Pence
Mike Pence

Depending on who Mr Trump appoints as Secretary of State, there is hope we shall hear far less of the Soros-inspired ‘Responsibility to Protect’, which in practice means organised destablisation and fake news from establishment media followed by regime change, followed by anarchy.

We must pray especially against the appointment to that office of the war-monger John Bolton.  Having said that, Rudy Guiliani and Mitt Romney are each of them anti-Russia insiders.  The delay in the appointment must mean the Trump team are still looking for someone who shares his views.

(03/12/2016 Update: On his ‘Thank You’ tour, Mr Trump has said “We will destroy ISIS. At the same time, we will pursue a new foreign policy that finally learns from the mistakes of the past. We will stop looking to topple regimes and overthrow governments, folks.”)

IT ALL HINGES ON THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

Clearly Mr Trump, his advisers and his running mate Mr Pence, who gives his testimony in this video, need wisdom from on high in their appointments.

But of course, much hinges on the electoral college on 19th December.  If Donald Trump makes it that far, and if the electors stay faithful to their state vote, he will at that point become President Elect and the elite will have been denied the Clinton presidency they were counting on.

So we must pray urgently for safety and protection for Donald Trump and also of course for Mike Pence.  In particular, may the Lord frustrate all attempts to assassinate Mr Trump.

Pray also that his appointments will be marked by wisdom and a desire for peace.

Psalm 140:4 Keep me, O LORD, from the hands of the wicked; preserve me from the violent man; who have purposed to overthrow my goings.

1Timothy 2:1 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; 2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Peter Tatchell: Gays and Muslims Unite!

Peter Tatchell addressing LGBT Humanists at the Conway Hall
Peter Tatchell addressing LGBT Humanists at the Conway Hall

Homosexuals and Muslims must unite in solidarity against ‘oppression’, Peter Tatchell has urged.

The veteran gay activist issued his clarion call at a meeting of LGBT Humanists at London’s Conway Hall on Friday night (11th November 2016).

Ethics and Tango

Over fifty attended the meeting deep in the bowels of the bastion of anti-Christian thinking.  Conway Hall is the headquarters of what was the South Place Ethical Society.  Incongruously, a tango-dancing club was meeting in the main hall.

Only about a quarter of those attending were women.  Around half of those were clad in Islamic dress.

Peter Tatchell firstly tried to draw an artificial distinction between Muslims, Islam and Islamism.  Islam is a religion and Islamism a political system, he suggested. Muslims, he appeared to say, were innocent, powerless bystanders to the excesses of the one and the atrocities of the other.

The Conway Hall, bastion of 'humanist ethics,' if there is such a thing.
The Conway Hall, bastion of ‘humanist ethics,’ if there is such a thing.

The Quran, he declared, said nothing derogatory against sodomy.  It was only in the Hadith where homosexuality was outlawed and penalties prescribed.  The Hadith were the sayings of Mohammed, ‘a mortal man’, whereas the Quran was divinely-inspired.  One presumes he meant ‘divinely-inspired according to Muslims’.  The thought of something being inspired by someone or something supernatural does not immediately appear to be a secularist concept.

Peter Tatchell does not get Islam

Therefore, what Mr Tatchell tries to tell those Muslims he comes across, and it seems he comes across many, is that homosexuality is just fine if you will only go to the roots of Islamic faith.

This is wrong for two reasons.  Firstly, the Hadith are not the ‘sayings’ of Mohammed, they are accounts of Mohammed’s life.  The word ‘hadith’ is Arabic for ‘story’.  Secondly, the Hadith carry equal authority with the Quran.  Mr Tatchell was thinking along Christian indeed along Protestant lines, where the Bible is the sole authority in matters of doctrine.  It isn’t like that in Islam.  You cannot appeal to the silence of the Quran in matters where the Hadith wax eloquent.

As to his central premise that both homosexuality and being a Muslim are oppressed in Britain today, Mr Tatchell offered no evidence.  But he wanted to give his audience hope that gays and Muslims could indeed unite against the imaginary oppression.  Therefore he told us that 17% of Iranian students claim to be homosexual.  The figure is of course ludicrous and has been rubbished online.

Seven of the Muslim family of twelve wore burkas, then complained people 'lloked at them'.
Seven of the Muslim family of twelve wore burkas on their trip to Skegness, then complained when people were negative about them.

Love in the Quran!

However, his relentless lobbying of the Muslim Council of Britain bore fruit in 2007 when they did not oppose the Sexual Orientation Regulations. Inevitably the change of heart was fleeting.  MCB reverted to type in 2012, when they opposed same-sex marriage.

Although some homosexuals had experienced hatred from Muslims, Muslim hearts and minds were changing, Peter Tatchell claimed.  Young Muslims in schools had been positive about gays, citing some imaginary ‘love and compassion in the Quran’.  He was working with ‘British Muslims for Secular Democracy’, a fringe group if ever there was one, founded by the notorious ex-Muslim secularist and talking head Yasmin Alibhai-Brown.  He was also proud to be a patron of ‘Tell Mama’.  This grievance group never stops looking around for real – or imaginary – discrimination against Muslims.  A recent ludicrous non-example was that experienced by the Skegness twelve.

Asia Bibi: still facing execution on a trumped-up charge of blasphemy
Asia Bibi: still facing execution on a trumped-up charge of blasphemy in Pakistan

So last year his Peter Tatchell Foundation launched ‘LGBT-Muslim Solidarity – Fight All Hate’.  You really would need a heart of stone not to laugh at the infantile way ‘progressive’ people cast their political opponents as motivated by ‘hate’ – as if they themselves aren’t. On the other hand, Peter Tatchell is an intelligent guy. Maybe he is sending them up.

Demographic reality

Now to demographic reality.  Atheists and Christians alike in the United Kingdom are barely replacing their population.  Homosexuals, without outside intervention, do not have children.  Because they cannot procreate they have to recruit or adopt, but that is another story.  The only group in the British population who are growing is Muslims, whose women are simply doing what their bodies were created to do.  It may be only a matter of some thirty years before Muslims, and that means Islam and Islamists, gain political control in this country.  The best advice for Christians and homosexuals alike is: ‘keep your passports up to date.’

On a positive note, those assembled did allow me to ask a question.  In response Peter Tatchell was gracious enough to concede, to the dismay of sections of his audience, that Christians rather than homosexuals or Muslims are indeed the most persecuted group around the globe.  He spoke in particular of Pakistan and the ordeal of Asai Bibi, who cannot find a judge with the courage simply to release her.  Judges in Pakistan are all in fear of their lives.  From Islamists, not Muslims, no doubt.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

USA – don’t vote for war

hillaryPresident Obama has warned the fate of the world is at stake in the USA presidential election tomorrow.

He is surely right.  Wherever we are in the world, we need to pray that Americans make the right choice.

Firstly, there has probably never been an American election where the choice was between two more unlikeable characters.

But looking beyond that, which candidate will be better for peace in the world?

If we ignore internal US matters and just look at US foreign policy, the way in which we need to pray becomes very clear.

Madeleine Albright wearing her 'war' badge
Madeleine Albright wearing her ‘war’ badge

Hillary Clinton is solidly in the Neo-Con camp that gave us the War on Terror, incursions into Afghanistan, hundreds of thousands of deaths in Iraq, the ruin of Libya, the destabilisation of Syria and the rise of first Al-Qaeda then ISIS.  Her old friend Madeleine Albright continues to urge a ‘fight’ with President Putin.  She is totally sold out to the George Soros doctrine of ‘Responsibility to Protect’ – or ‘Excuse to Interfere’, as it should properly be called.

In her determination to squeeze Russia out of Syria and the Mediterranean and her endorsement of Pentagon and NATO sabre-rattling in Europe, she could quite easily start world war three.  Remember, had it not been for Oleg Gordievsky’s intelligence on the USSR, a provocative NATO exercise in 1983 could have provoked a Russian nuclear strike.

donaldtrumpThere are many in the US Pentagon who stand to benefit from increased spending on armaments and they are dreading the election of Donald Trump.

Why?  Because, as Sean O’Grady put it the Independent, Donald Trump ‘get’s it’.  He does ‘realpolitik’.  He understands that Russia offers no threat to the United States (or its allies, for that matter).  So if the Russians want a naval and an air base in the Med, or a presence on the Black Sea, they can have it.

Donald Trump, despite his aggressive persona and his bullish comments about walls and suchlike, is the candidate for peace.

That is why I shall be praying for a Trump victory to tomorrow, and why I invite you to join me.

Psalm 140:1 Deliver me, O LORD, from the evil man: preserve me from the violent man; 2 Which imagine mischiefs in their heart; continually are they gathered together for war. 

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Limited consultation on sharia courts

Kadhis (judges) of the Sharia Council delve into Islamic law
Kadhis (judges) of the Islamic Sharia Council delve into Islamic law

The Governments’ consultation into sharia courts opened in July and closed in August. It was said to be ‘part of an independent review into its use in England and Wales’.

Professor Mona Siddiqui, a Muslim herself, was appointed to lead it, ‘investigating the treatment of women in cases involving divorce, domestic violence and child custody’.

NO INFIDELS NEED RESPOND

It was not, as so many thought it should be, a consultation into the principle of whether a rival law system should operate under the established legal system in England and Wales. The Home Office only wanted to hear from ‘people with experience of sharia law.’

Muslim women are not all opposed to Sharia
Muslim women are not all opposed to Sharia

That meant ‘Kadhis’, sharia judges, and those on the receiving end of Islamic justice.

The consultation page said:

‘We would like to hear from you if you have knowledge, expertise or experience on the use of sharia law, especially if you:

‘work or have worked as part of a sharia council in the last 5 years

‘have used a sharia council in any capacity in the last 5 years,’

It meant only Muslims could respond and no-one, including a Muslim with misgivings about sharia councils, who had not paritcipated in such a court would be admitted to the consultation.

ARBITRATION SYSTEM

Sharia courts operate within the arbitration system which was set up in the nineteenth century by the Arbitration Act 1889. Arbitration is especially useful in commercial disputes and cases involving land or construction. Costs for parties are lower and by agreeing to arbitration, parties relieve time pressure on the overburdened courts. The outcome on parties who agree to arbitration is binding and enforceable.

Arbitration panels operating specifically for Muslims fall within this system.

The problem is that no-one is really sure what system of law is being applied by the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT), the main Islamic arbitration council which has sprung up.

KADHI COURTS

Is it true that Islamic arbitration, as Government ministers stoutly maintain, and Wikipedia announces: ‘operates within the framework of English law and does not constitute a separate Islamic legal system’?

Or is the Kadhi (the Arabic word for ‘judge’) secretly handing down Fatwa (Arabic for ‘judgment’) using Sharia (the Arabic word for ‘law’)?

Kahdi Courts using the Arbitration framework are said on the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal website (above) to be ‘a viable alternative for the Muslim community seeking to resolve disputes in accordance with Islamic Sacred Law’.

How can they be in accordance with Sharia and also with the law of England and Wales, or that of Scotland?  The Scottish Government said in a response to a consultation that parties could explicitly agree to ‘apply Sharia law’ to their dispute.  They also said: ‘Any final award must comply with Scots or UK law otherwise it would be unenforceable in the Scottish courts.’  What does that mean if a party has already agreed to Sharia?

SHARIA DIVORCE COURTS

In addition to Kadhi Courts operating within the arbitration system, there are others, including the Islamic Sharia Council (ISC), set up to apply Islamic law outside it.  95% or the work of the ISC is to do with divorce, enabling Muslim parties (mainly, it appears, women) to gain an Islamic divorce in addition to a UK civil divorce.

Although they say they do not settle matters of residence of children, Machteld Zee, a Dutch author, looking at the way these courts operate, concluded they do indeed decide those matters.  In practice, a party would probably then concede the Sharia position decided by the Kadhis on his or her next appearance in the civil court.

She revealed there are around 85 such councils in England and Wales.  She also said they invariably give custody or ‘residence’ of children to fathers.  Some might add ‘it’s about time’ in view of the opposite tendency in civil divorce courts, but that is exactly the point.  There appear to be competing parallel systems operating.

MUSLIMS ‘BENEFIT’ FROM SHARIA

Setting up the enquiry, Theresa May, as Home Secretary, claimed that many British Muslims “benefit a great deal” from the existence of Kadhi Courts.  Nile Gardiner, a foreign policy analyst and former aide to Margaret Thatcher, was unimpressed by her comments, describing them as “unbelievable”.

Mrs May said: “Many British people of different faiths follow religious codes and practices, and benefit a great deal from the guidance they offer.

“A number of women have reportedly been victims of what appear to be discriminatory decisions taken by Sharia councils, and that is a significant concern.

“There is only one rule of law in our country, which provides rights and security for every citizen.”

The testimony of the MAP and the findings of Machfeld Zee indicate that rule of law is set aside the moment a Muslim agrees to be bound by a Sharia Kadhi Court.

EXPERTISE

Mrs May said, “Professor Siddiqui, supported by a panel with a strong balance of academic, religious and legal expertise, will help us better understand whether and the extent to which Sharia law is being misused or exploited and make recommendations to the Government on how to address this.”

According to the Home Office, the panel includes ‘family law barrister Sam Momtaz, retired high court judge Sir Mark Hedley and specialist family law lawyer Anne Marie Hutchinson OBE QC’.  Crucially, it will also be ‘advised’ by two ‘religious and theological experts’ who are Islamic preachers: Imam Sayed Ali Abbas Razawi and Imam Qari Asim.

Comments made by Imam Razawi reported in the Independent suggest he supports the death penalty in Islamic states, promotes negative views about homosexuality and believes Western clothing is a sign of corruption.

Imam Asim is attached to Leeds Makkah Masjid, one of the UK’s largest mosques.  Secularist Muslim-origin signatories to a letter seen by The Independent pronounced the consultation a whitewash before it even began.

We await the consultation’s findings with interest to see if they will be proved right.

 

Jo Cox, and why Brendan Cox is wrong

The Late Jo Cox MP Photo Credit: Yui Mok/PA Wire
The Late Jo Cox MP Photo Credit: Yui Mok/PA Wire
The Late Jo Cox MP
Photo Credit: Yui Mok/PA Wire

The appalling and senseless murder of Jo Cox MP on Thursday 16th June 2016 by the deranged psychotic Thomas Mair shocked us all and resulted in a very public outpouring of grief from her politician colleagues.

Disgracefully, some of them made shameless political capital out of it for the #Remain campaign in the European Referendum. One leaflet, distributed in Kate Hoey’s constituency, directly blamed the murder on the veteran #Leave Labour MP. ‘Jo Cox’s tragic murder is possibly only the start’, it raved.

Support Christian Voice →

USING AN OPPORTUNITY

Jo Cox’s widower, Brendan, also a campaigner for left-wing causes, chimed in, quick to blame ‘hate’ rather than shortcomings in our mental health service for his wife’s death. We should have sympathy for him in his loss, but to claim ‘Politics’ (rather than lunacy) was behind her death went beyond normal grieving. It was political point-scoring.

Brendan Cox talking to the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg
Brendan Cox talking to the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg

Brendan Cox has now tweeted a link to a fund-raising page for his late wife on the ‘gofundme’ website. Frankly, he is using the opportunity to raise funds initially for two causes which might not ordinarily draw any support or credence from anyone outside his circle, in addition to the worthy Royal Voluntary Service.

HOPE NOT HATE

The second of his three causes is ‘Hope not Hate’ which ‘seeks to challenge and defeat the politics of hate and extremism within local communities, building resilience against the politics of hate and fear’. ‘Hate’ is a buzzword used by those on the godless left to demonise anyone who disagrees with them.

In practice, ‘Hope not Hate’ are pro-Islam and pro-sodomy. Anyone who opposes those causes is not someone with whom they respectfully disagree, but one motivated by ‘hate’. Indeed, that is how Brendan Cox used ‘hate’, trying to use his wife’s tragic death as a campaign tool. In his eyes, anyone wanting the leave the EU, especially over concerns about immigration, is driven by ‘hate’.

So- called 'White Helmets celebrating with Al Nusra jihadists
So- called ‘White Helmets celebrating with Al Nusra jihadists

WHITE HELMETS

The third of Brendan’s three causes is the Syrian ‘White Helmets’, also known as ‘Syrian National Defence’. It was not formed by Syrians, but by the UK Foreign Office. Its operatives pose as humanitarians in Syria. In practice, they are anti-Assad extremist Sunni Muslims allied with Al Nusra front, the Al Qaeda offshoot.

And in truth, they don’t need a single penny of our money. Despite claiming on its website not to take any money from governments, ‘White Helmets’ has received $23m from the US Government and $40m from organisations funded by George Soros. The US and Soros only give to organisations which advance their interests; in this case, the destructive one of regime change in Syria.

AID WORKER

Before being elected to Parliament in 2015, Mrs Cox had many years of experience as an aid worker and advisor for global charities. According to her LinkedIn profile, she spent five years working for Oxfam in Belgium, the U.S., and the U.K. She was a Strategy Consultant for Save the Children and NSPCC, as well as a Strategic Adviser for both The Freedom Fund and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Jo and Brendan Cox joined Bob Geldof's tirade against fishermen on the Thames the day before her tragic murder.
Jo and Brendan Cox joined Bob Geldof’s foul-mouthed tirade against fishermen on the Thames the day before her tragic murder.

Additionally, she served as a Patron, Trustee, and Board member for various other campaigns and causes. She also received the Young Global Leader award in 2009 at the Davos World Economic Forum, and was a winner of the DEVEX 40 under 40 International Development Leaders Award in 2012.

INAPPROPRIATE

In September last year, Brendan Cox left Save the Children amid complaints about ‘inappropriate behaviour’ towards women. He quit after four years as its director of policy and advocacy. He denied the claims made against him and the charity declined to comment.

The day before her murder, Jo and Brendan Cox and their two children joined Sir Bob Geldof’s well-oiled, foul-mouthed flotilla by manning an inflatable against Brexit-leaning fishermen on the Thames. The pop millionaire’s obscene gestures in the direction of the fishermen revealed the contempt of the well-heeled #Remain camp against ordinary people.

Jo Cox, fifth from left, with other pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel Labour MPs at the House of Commons.
Jo Cox, fifth from left, with other pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel Labour MPs at the House of Commons.

ANTI-ISRAEL

Despite a eulogy from the Chief Rabbi, Jo Cox was no parliamentary friend of Israel. She included goods from ‘Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank‘ among ‘unsavoury activities’ which should be boycotted.

Two days after her death, the Palestinian Hamas terrorist group (also Sunni Muslim) were on the bandwagon:  ‘The Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas has expressed its sincere condolences to the family, friends and admirers of slain UK MP Jo Cox.

‘The Palestinian people have lost a friend and a defender of their rights,’ Hamas said in a press release on Saturday. ‘Cox was … a passionate advocate for the Palestinian cause.’

The Hamas Charter states its Islamic determination to ‘eliminate’ the state of Israel, helpfully explaining, in Article 28, that this is because Israel is ‘Jewish’.  In Article seven it urges Muslims to ‘fight the Jews and kill them’.  Hamas is the Palestinian governing authority of the Gaza Strip.

Also in the House of Commons, Jo Cox voted for Doctor Assisted Dying in September last year and abstained on the crucial vote in November over whether the Royal Air Force should bomb Islamic State in Syria.

LACK OF DECENCY

Douglas Murray, writing in the Spectator on Saturday, complained about the lack of ‘decency’ around Jo Cox’s death.

“‘Remainers’, he said, may try to say that a vote to stay in the EU is a vote against ‘hatred’ and for ‘hope’ or the politics of ‘unity’ over those of ‘division’. Such a move would bring about the triumph of the assassin’s veto in our society – something which could not only have appalling short-term consequences, but bloody long-term ones as well. I trust that those campaigning for ‘Remain’ recognise that a victory achieved on those terms would be the sourest and most divisive victory of all.”

Sadly, Brendan Cox has lacked that decency at this solemn time.

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

British Muslims becoming more radical

Trevor Phillips
Trevor Phillips is ready to say ‘I was wrong.’

Trevor Phillips is presenting a programme on social attitudes among British Muslims on Channel 4 tomorrow.

It is called ‘What British Muslims Really Think’ and will air at 10pm on Wednesday 13th April 2016.

Some uncomfortable statistics will be revealed which should send shivers down liberal elite spines.  The pain will be made worse for them by the fact that Trevor Phillips was head of the Commission for Racial Equality.  He promoted many of the views he now dismisses, particularly about the speed with which Muslims would integrate and adopt British customs and attitudes.

When asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed that homosexuality should be legal in Britain, 18% said they agreed and 52% said they disagreed, compared with 5% among the public at large who disagreed. Almost half (47%) said they did not agree that it was acceptable for a gay person to become a teacher, compared with 14% of the general population.

Nearly a quarter (23%) supported the introduction of sharia law in some areas of Britain.  As many as 31% said Muslim men could have more than one wife – with many Muslim women agreeing – while 39% agreed that “wives should always obey their husbands”.  The mainstream culture would probably find a majority saying husbands should obey their wives, so the chasm between Muslims and secular Britain could hardly be more stark.

The Guardian found at least one Muslim leader of a women’s group who took issue with the findings.

Huffington Post quoted moans about the survey methods from the Muslim Council of Britain and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).  Apparently, ICM went to areas with at least 20% Muslims to conduct their interviews, simply because it costs less to find people willing to take part in a survey where there are many of the target group.

Elshad Iskandarov of the OIC, told HuffPost UK: “If a particular study focusses on areas with at least 20% muslim populations these areas are likely to be more deprived than most, making extremism more attractive.”  That is a telling comment.  Actually, there is no evidence that Muslims in more middle-class areas, particularly young Muslims, are any more liberal that their peers in Oldham, for example.

In an article in the Sunday Times, Trevor Phillips says, inter alia:

‘The problem with Britain’s liberal white elite is twofold. First, they find it hard to grasp that people of colour may not want to reveal their true selves to people who do not share their backgrounds. The fact is that most people of colour are raised to expect that white folks will let them down. And to be frank, most black and Asian Britons will tell you that their expectations are seldom confounded.

‘Second, Britain’s increasingly deracinated opinion-forming classes are puzzled by the fierce attachment to religion among ethnic minorities. The number of places of worship attended mostly by Muslims and black evangelicals is rising. The fact that Britain’s ethnic minorities are intensely committed to their religious beliefs and practices seems baffling to secular liberals — indeed, somewhat threatening. Some of my journalist friends imagine that, with time, the Muslims will grow out of it. They won’t.

‘It should come as no surprise that Muslim liberals are in despair. They knew all of this long ago. And unlike the political elite and the liberal media, they recognise that British Muslim opinion is hardening against them. The journalist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, who has had to seek police protection because of her liberal views, argues that the optimistic belief that time and social contact will naturally lead to the integration of Muslims is mistaken: “You know, we [liberal Muslims] are a dying breed — in 10 years there will be very few of us left unless something really important is done.”

‘Britain’s Muslims are a diverse group; but, rich or poor, British-born or not, most have a deep commitment to their faith. Many are distressed by what they see as white Britain’s increasing secularism, low morals and loss of confidence in many of its own values. Those who told ICM’s researchers that they would prefer to live a more separate life in Britain are sending a clear signal: they really don’t want to adopt much of our decadent way of life.

‘Oddly, the biggest obstacles we now face in addressing the growth of this nation-within-a-nation are not created by British Muslims themselves. Many of our (distinctly un-diverse) elite political and media classes simply refuse to acknowledge the truth. Any undesirable behaviours are attributed to poverty and alienation. Backing for violent extremism must be the fault of the Americans. Oppression of women is a cultural trait that will fade with time, nothing to do with the true face of Islam.

‘Even when confronted with the growing pile of evidence to the contrary, and the angst of the liberal minority of British Muslims, clever, important people still cling to the patronising certainty that British Muslims will, over time, come to see that “our” ways are better. And since there are so few Muslims in the corridors of power, they seldom run into anyone who can show them the reality. Those who do want to make a difference are often consumed by fear that they will be seen as prejudiced. So while our liberal elite wrings its hands in anguish and makes school children celebrate Eid, Diwali, Hanukkah — and Easter — hundreds of young people are being seduced to join Islamist fanatics abroad, thousands of young girls are shipped off to have their genitals mutilated, and many more are pressured into marriages they do not want.’

If you cannot access the Sunday Times article, Bill Muehlenberg carries a lot of what Trevor Phillips wrote here.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Schools gay propaganda in RE

Councillor Tony Orgee
Councillor Tony Orgee

Children in Cambridgeshire are to indoctrinated with pro-sodomy propaganda following a decision by the local Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education (SACRE), chaired by Cllr Tony Orgee (left).

The leaflet will promote the teaching of ‘gender identity’ and ‘sexuality’ in religious education in the County.

Both are ‘protected’ characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 and public authorities in England and Wales, which includes county councils responsible for education, have a duty under Section 149 of the Act to promote them.

The Committee, which includes a Mormon and a Muslim, approved the leaflet at its meeting on 4th February but has not yet openly published it.  It was due to be discussed at pro-sodomy charity Stonewall’s first inter-faith seminar on 25th February and the news report said it ‘contains advice about handling issues around
gender identity and sexuality in RE, together with a range of resources for teachers’.

SACRE chairman and Cambridgeshire County Councillor Tony Orgee (Conservative) said: “Religion is about how people live their lives and raises questions about what it is to be human. It encompasses a diversity of views about the ethical ideals that guide human behaviour and why these are followed.

“All religions therefore present a range of beliefs and practices relevant to issues relating to human sexuality
and gender identity. This new leaflet crystallizes the importance of adhering to these values – it will be an invaluable teaching aid.”

What Cllr Orgee did not say is that religion is first and foremost about how people search for whatever they see as divine and that not one world religion endorses sodomy as a legitimate behaviour.

Homosexual Councillor Ed Cearns
Homosexual Councillor Ed Cearns

Tory-run Cambridgeshire County Councillor Ed Cearns, Liberal Democrat, a fellow member of SACRE, added: “I am delighted this leaflet has been produced to coincide with LGBT history month.

“As a former RE teacher, I understand … the vital work of fostering an understanding of the harm caused by homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying.”

One would have thought that any bullying was harmful, but propaganda such as the SACRE leaflet is not about stopping bullying – it may even add to it – but about promoting perversion.

Cllr Cearns is himself homosexual.  He was on the Rainbow Radio show on http://cambridge105.fm/ on the 20th of this month talking about ‘being gay in the council and LGBT History Month’ (which is February, of course – you knew that).

Interestingly, Cllr Cearns said publishing the leaflet was part of something called “the Stonewall Education Index”.  He meant its ‘Education Equality Index‘ which is a league table of education authorities which are doing the most to promote perversion.  Cambridgeshire County Council is third, after Bath & North East Somerset Council and Hertfordshire County Council.  All three are Conservative-controlled.

Cllr Cearns is a very committed gay activist.  He popped up when the LGBT ‘history month’ bandwagon rolled into Cambridge at the end of last year, complete with ‘lessons for local primary school children and workshops for youth workers, faith workers and librarians.’

And when Cambridgeshire County Council failed to fly the homosexual ‘rainbow’ flag from Shire Hall in February 2014, it was Cllr Cearns who led the complaints.  He was rewarded when the flag was flown for the first time this year.  No doubt an OBE will follow in due course, for ‘services to diversity’.

Councillor Robin Page
Councillor Robin Page

One person who will receive no such honour, nor would he welcome it, is farmer, journalist and political activist Robin Page.  The former ‘one man and his dog’ television presenter is also a fiercely independent councillor for South Cambridgeshire District Council.  When that outfit flew the rainbow flag in February 2013, he blogged:

“The event is pathetic and makes the council a PC laughing stock. In fact it shows a lack of respect to the rest of society.  What about those who are celibate – who have achieved much throughout history – is a flag being raised for them?

“Then of course we could have a flag celebrating vegans? And what about a flag celebrating the achievements of all those with irritable bowel syndrome?  I want to be part of a community – not a division in a conglomerate of divisions.”

Conservative Tony Orgee, who as well as being on the Cambridgeshire SACRE as a County Councillor is also chair of South Cambs, described Mr Page’s comments as “very disappointing”.  There’s a surprise.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Death Cafe

This is the transcript of the video above – check against delivery.

What are these ‘death cafe’s’ all about, are they good or bad? And what do we make of the Church of England’s ‘grave talk’ project?

One paper said that over five hundred death cafe events have taken place to date across the UK and further afield, including the US, Australia and New Zealand.

The objective of a death cafe, so its people say, is ‘to increase awareness of death with a view to helping people make the most of their (finite) lives.’

According to the death cafe website, ‘At a Death Cafe people, often strangers, gather to eat cake, drink tea and discuss death.’

Cakes with black icing and skulls form a big part of Death Cafe, apparently.
Cakes with black icing and skulls form a big part of Death Cafe, apparently.

Yes, Cake seems to play a big part, especially cakes with black icing and skulls on them served on plates with skull motifs.

In Manchester, funeral director Hugh O’Brien hosted a death cafe event in Heaton Moor.  He said there was “a British reticence about death”.  “Everyone seems to be afraid of it,” he went on.

With a finite, in this case a truly finite – market to work in, I’m surprised funeral directors aren’t falling over each other to host these obvious marketing opportunities.

Anyway, the death cafe originator, one Jonathan Underwood from Hackney, is right now, in November 2015, selling shares for a permanent Death Cafe in London.

He thinks his project is the best thing he can do to make a better planet.

Mr Underwood has said there should be no fear about discussing death, and this is his reason: “you don’t get pregnant by talking about sex,” he says, “so why would talking about death make you die?”

I’m sorry old boy, but that is a non-sequitor. You can quite easily feel sexy by talking about sex, and talking about getting pregnant, especially talking positively about it, CAN help a couple have the child they so earnestly want.

In the same way, talking about death, especially talking enthusiatically about it, can hasten it. That’s a basic spiritual principle.

The Church of England’s ‘Grave Talk’ is different, because, as its website says, the Christian faith ‘holds the hope that death is not the end’.

A parish can put on a ‘grave talk’ evening to help people planning or going to a funeral, to have a conversation about death and dying, or to help with grief and loss of a loved one.

For me, that’s a good work, with an emphasis quite different from death cafe.

Let’s face it, we’ve just had an MP trying – and failing, thank God – to bring in an Assisted Dying Bill in this country, there are people going to some ghastly overseas clinic to commit suicide, and a growing suicide cult among young people led to seventy-nine deaths in Bridgend in Wales over just a five-year period.

Teenagers are taking their lives because of bullying, and suicide is the most common cause of death for men under thirty-five in Britain.

Death Cafe protagonists will deny their project has anything to do with promoting suicide. But even if it is just a sales pitch for undertakers, popularising the idea of death, glamorising it with skulls and black icing, won’t exactly help vulnerable teenagers.

Our lives are more than the matter of our death, or anyone else’s. Being obsessed about death, at any level, is simply not healthy for individuals, or society.

In the Bible, Jacob says he is about to be gathered to his fathers. He blesses his children and gives directions for his place of burial. And that’s it.

You see, the overwhelming principle in the Bible is that of life. God told the people of Israel:

Deut 30:19 I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live.

People need life cafes, not death cafes, to be honest. And, thank God, we have quite a few of those. They are often held in a building with a spire on the top, or just in a hall, on a Sunday morning, and quite often they have a cross outside. There’s probably one near you. It’s called a church. Chances are, you’ll find someone inside who knows the author of life, one Jesus Christ. And if you get to know him too, death won’t hold any fear for you at all.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

Evangelist in Court

Northampton Magistrates Court where Bill edwards is on trial on 19th and 20th November 2015
Northampton Magistrates Court where evangelist Bill Edwards is on trial twice this month: on 19th and 20th November 2015

STOP PRESS 20/11/2015:

CASE ON THURSDAY 19th DROPPED!

CASE ON FRIDAY 20th DROPPED IN RETURN FOR BIND-OVER ORDER!

PRAISE THE LORD!

BUT WHY WERE THESE CASES EVER BROUGHT?

Article continues:

Another Christian evangelist is in court on alleged public order offences.

Bill Edwards, well-known to this ministry for his tireless efforts for the Gospel, is to face magistrates in Northampton twice this month, on 19th November and then again the following day, 20th November.  The cases will both be heard at 10.00am at Northampton Magistrates Court, Campbell Square, Northampton, NN1 3EB.  Both charges have been laid under the Public Order Act 1986.

PRAYER IMPORTANT

Mr Edwards has told Christian Voice he values prayer more than actual physical presence.  He said: ‘Obviously I will be glad of support by Christians at either of the court cases but it is a very long way for folk like you to come and prayer for the Lord’s help is, of course, more important.’

Despite that, members local to Northampton will surely want to support him, and those who can reach the court will wish to demonstrate how serious their prayers are by being there in person.

LOCAL MP COMPLAINED

The first charge relates to a peaceful protest Bill Edwards carried out outside the house of local MP Andrea Leadsom (Conservative) in the village of Slapton on 18th July.

Mr Edwards said: ‘I did not expect to be arrested and planned after an hour to move to another village for door to door evangelism. I did try to inform Northamptonshire Police beforehand about the protest but was unable to get through in time before I left home.  I told Mrs. Leadsom why I was there and spoke to her husband and children and their friends.’  He is charged under Sections 4A and 5 of the Public Order Act.

ARRESTED AT SCHOOL

The following day the evangelist is charged under Sections 5 and 6 of the Act. Mr Edwards told us: ‘The second arrest and charge occurred after I carried a banner against homosexuals outside a primary school in Brackley on July 21st. There was a great deal of anger and physical opposition from certain people and again I was surprised with the outcome.  Both of my banners employed words of Scripture.’

A personal note:

Evangelists like Bill Edwards are rare.  They often do things others of us wouldn’t.  I should probably content myself with writing to my MP or asking to lobby him at the House of Commons.  I am not sure, even if he refused to meet me, that I should protest outside his home.  If I did, of course, I should expect him to have a thicker and more avuncular skin than the average person and should be extremely surprised if he were to call the police.

As for the school, I know how liberal many parents are these days and have myself been shouted at when trying to encourage parents to protect their children from homosexual propaganda.  In that situation, one really would expect the school’s head teacher to call the police, but would expect the police to defuse the situation on their arrival rather than start arresting people.

On the other hand, for some years now the police have been arresting evangelists for so-called ‘homophobic’ language, to the extent that even the National Secular Society became embarrassed by the negative publicity around assaults on our freedom of speech and joined the Christian Institute to call for a change in the law.

But despite that high-profile joint campaign by the National Secular Society and the Christian Institute to draw the teeth of the Public Order Act by removing the word ‘insulting’ from the list of behaviours it made illegal, nothing has actually changed.  The police appear to carrying on with ‘business as usual’.

That is why, although Bill Edwards’ approach might differ from my own (although I too was arrested under the same Act of Parliament for witnessing outside Cardiff ‘Mardi Gras’ in 2006), I am honoured to stand with him and to show the magistrates that at least one of his brothers in Christ supports him enough to turn up on the day.

READ: Deut 31:6; Psalm 103:6; Jer 1:17, 5:14; Luke 12:11-12; Acts 4:18-20; Rom 10:8; 3John 1:17.

PRAY: Thank the Lord for evangelists who are prepared to risk arrest for preaching the Gospel. Pray that Bill Edwards finds favour with the magistrates.  Pray for his solicitor, Michael Phillips, to be a good and effective advocate.  Pray for much support from local Christians.  Pray for Bill Edwards, as he says, ‘that the Lord will be glorified whatever the outcomes … and that I may witness a good confession against the homofascism and antichrist attitude of the authorities of our country.’

SUPPPORT: Come to Northampton Magistrates Court, Campbell Square, Northampton, NN1 3EB at 10.00am on Thursday 19th and Friday 20th November.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

 

What is the Gender Pay Gap?

David Cameron working out the gender pay gap.
David Cameron working out the gender pay gap.

The UK Government is going to force firms to reveal the bonuses they pay to men and to women.

Apparently, in the UK, a woman on average earns around 80p for every £1 earned by a man. The Government will also make it a legal requirement for every company with more than 250 employees to publish the difference between the average pay of their male and female employees.

Earlier this year, business hit a target for the percentage of women on company boards. That was set at twenty-five percent by government adviser Lord Davies. Be in no doubt he will want that to go to fifty percent.

Our Prime Minister, Mr Cameron, has said: “You can’t have true opportunity without equality. There is no place for a pay gap in today’s society and we are delivering on our promises to address it.”

Maria Miller MP, who chairs the Commons Women and Equalities Committee chimed in, launching an inquiry by her committee into government strategy on reducing the difference between what women and men are paid.

Mrs Miller said unequal pay was predominantly a problem that affected women over forty and that measures already announced by the government did not account for this group.

I saw a video recently in which one Mike Buchanan was pointing to research indicating that having loads of women on company boards impacted negatively on their profitability.

GOD CREATED THE MAN TO WORK AND THE WOMAN TO HELP HIM

But I think my disquiet is more with the principle that gender pay equality is either achievable or desirable.

You see, in the beginning, God created the man, gave him some work, and then created the woman to be a helper for him. The pattern of a man as the head of the household, providing outside the home and women caring within it is still one which chimes with people and to which they aspire.

Even in what we regard as the most primitive societies, women stay near the camp, keeping their home smart, gathering stuff, looking after the children, while the men go out and hunt.  The women usually cook what the men bring back.

Most women, in all the surveys I have seen, would rather be at home looking after their children than out at work. But sadly we have too many single-parent families today, and most of those are headed by a mother, and in two-parent households, governments have organised things so that today so many families need two incomes to survive.

GENDER PAY GAP IS A MYTH

I also want to suggest that this ‘gender pay gap’ might actually be a myth. After all, it’s illegal to pay a man more than a woman for doing an equivalent job.

So how do the Government come up with their 80% figure? Well, they just take a average of what every man earns and compare it with the average of what every woman earns, then round it up to the nearest 10%.

But men do more dirty and dangerous jobs, that pay more – and kill many of them. Many women – probably too many for the government’s liking – actually want to bring up their own children. Taking time out of a career inevitably impacts on earning ability.

And when you read about the real differences between men and women, you find that men are more driven and focused on achievements, while women are more concerned with relationships.

Lastly, if more men than women prioritise work, as the figures seem to show, won’t that, coupled with natural testosterone-fueled ambition, impact on relative earnings?

NEGATIVE PAY-GAPS

According to the Office for National Statistics, the gender pay gap is actually 9.4% for full-time employees. It only rises to 19.1% (not 20%) when part-time employees are included. And for part-time employees, they say, ‘the higher rate of pay for women than men results in a ‘negative’ gender pay gap’. The Government are not campaigning to address that problem, or seeking to raise the pay of young men to equal that of young women.

According to the Guardian newspaper, there is a negative gender pay gap among the young. ‘The pay gap is low or slightly reversed among 18 to 39-year-olds, but the gap for hourly earnings grows from the age of 40 onwards, reaching its highest point for women in their 50s’, said the paper. This is precisely the point where women are taking time out of their career for family reasons and men are nearing the peak of theirs.

The Government protest that after decades of equal pay acts, Britain still has the sixth-highest pay gap between men and women in the EU. But even this claim is highly simplistic.

The European Commission say: ‘A high pay gap is usually characteristic of a labour market which is highly segregated, meaning that women are more concentrated in a restricted number of sectors and/or professions (e.g. Czech Republic, Estonia and Finland), or in which a significant proportion of women work part-time (e.g. Germany and Austria)’. Both of those, to a certain extent, would apply to the United Kingdom.

The BBC’s Mark Easton asked ‘which jobs have more women than men‘, and he linked to a 2012 report from the House of Commons Library. (Click on the PDF to see the full report).

Another pay gap is never talked about.  It is the gap between what people earn in the private sector and in the public sector.  According to ONS: ‘Private sector earnings have remained consistently at around 85% of public sector earnings since 2009.’

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.

‘Putin’ makes Elton John’s Day

Elton John promoting sodomy.
Elton John promoting sodomy through his ‘Aids Foundation’.

Sir Elton John was on the receiving end of a prank this week after expressing a desire last Sunday to lobby Russia’s President Vladimir Putin over Russia’s antipathy to advancing the cause of sodomy.

The singer had already been promoting gay rights in Ukraine, where he was on tour.

Two days later, Sir Elton had switched from saying the president’s stance was ‘ridiculous’, ‘isolating and prejudiced’ to praising him for ‘reaching out’ by apparently phoning the ageing pop star out of the blue.

The only problem was, the president’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov told reporters that reports of a conversation were “not true”.

“I don’t know who spoke to Elton John but President Putin did not speak to him,” he said.  “… most importantly we didn’t receive any proposals to meet.”

He added: “If the president does get such a signal from Elton John, the president has always been open to discuss any… human rights problems, any issues. He is always ready to clarify the real situation.”

The ‘real situation’ is that Russia has passed a law outlawing homosexual propaganda to protect its young people.

‘Wonderful moment’ in Elton’s life

'Vovan' (right) and 'Lexus'
‘Vovan’ (right) and ‘Lexus’

The next day, one Vladimir Krasnov, known as “Vovan”, admitted that he made the call with his sidekick Alexei Stolyarov, known as “Lexus”.

Vovan told the BBC and Russian newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda, “Alexei has excellent English so he played Dmitry Peskov and translated our conversation. And I was Vladimir Putin.”

“It turned out that Elton John was really expecting that call, so he really believed he was talking to the people we said we were,” he said, adding that the singer had been in a London recording studio at the time of the call.

The recording and a transcript were gleefully added to the Russia Today website.

Sir Elton told the pranksters that he was ‘extremely honored’ to be called.  ‘It is a great privilege to be able to speak to one of the most influential people in the world. It’s amazing,’ he continued.

The singer concluded the call by saying to Lexus, “Please thank him for his time and tell him he’s made my day. It’s a very wonderful moment in my life.”

“He really believed he was talking to the people we said we were,” said Vladimir Krasnov, known as “Vovan”.

Propaganda point

Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin

By Thursday, the musician was putting a brave face on his discomfort, saying he still wanted to speak to President Putin and then deciding to make a propaganda point out of it.

On his Instagram account, John posted a picture of a man with a bloodied face, whom we were to assume had acquired the injury from someone opposed to sodomy. John said: “Pranks are funny. Homophobia, however, is never funny.”

What is even less funny is authority figures like teachers telling children there is nothing wrong with being homosexual and encouraging them to turn a transient phase which they would otherwise grow out of into an ‘orientation’ which they will never shake off.

It also isn’t funny when entertainers use their considerable following to promote a pro-sodomy agenda.

We can but pray that Vladimir Putin will continue to keep Russian young people safe from the machinations of campaigning homosexuals like Elton John.

Assisted Dying – how your MP voted

Rob Marris MP. Introduced the Assisted Dying Bill
Rob Marris MP Introduced the Assisted Dying Bill

The unholy cause of euthanasia was dealt a blow yesterday as MPs voted three to one against the Assisted Dying Bill in the House of Commons.  Here is the Hansard record of the debate.

The text of the Bill is here on the Parliament website.  It is – or was  – a Private Member’s Bill, introduced by Rob Marris MP (Labour – Wolverhampton South West).

Much has been written and circulated about this clear attempt to introduce euthanasia into the United Kingdom, or at any rate to England and Wales.  The arguments were well rehearsed in the debate.

The leaders of all the major faith groups in Britain, except the Hindus, opposed it, according to the Guardian, as did disability organisations and the British Medical Association.

Archbishop  of Canterbury Rt Rev Justin Welby took the lead as Jewish, Muslim and Sikh leaders opposed the Assisted Dying Bill.
Archbishop of Canterbury Rt Rev Justin Welby took the lead as Jewish, Muslim and Sikh leaders opposed the Assisted Dying Bill.

For me, any measure which has to use weasel words to achieve its objective is suspect.

Here is clause 4 (1), headed ‘Assistance in dying’:

(1) The attending doctor of a person who has made a valid declaration under section 3 may prescribe medicines for that person to enable that person to end their own life.

‘Medicines’?  Here is a dictionary definition of ‘medicine’:

‘A drug or other preparation for the treatment or prevention of disease.’

Something which kills is not a medicine, it is a poison.  Why not be honest enough to use that word?  Dishonesty always means something underhand is going on.

Fiona Bruce MP observed that something given to kill someone is not a medicine but a poison.
Fiona Bruce MP observed that something given to kill someone is not a medicine but a poison.

Fiona Bruce MP, who spoke at 10:44am in the debate, picked up on exactly that point, the only MP to do so, although many excellent and passionate speeches were made opposing the measure.

The issue of euthanasia, or assisted dying, will not come back in this parliament, and may not resurface for more than a decade. It is eighteen years since it was last debated in the House of Commons.

We give God all the thanks and the glory. If you wrote to your MP, or prayed into this matter, then thank the Lord that you were part of his victory.

 

Here is the record of the vote (note that ‘Tellers’ support the lobby they were counting in.

The House having divided: Ayes 118, Noes 330.

Division No. 69 2.7 pm

AYES

Tellers for the Ayes:

NOES

Tellers for the Noes:

Question accordingly negatived.

 

Submission to NICE on ‘dying’

Fiona Bruce MP saved her own father from death on the Liverpool Care Pathway.
Fiona Bruce MP saved her own father from death on the Liverpool Care Pathway.

We have sent our submission to NICE on their ‘Care of the dying adult: draft guideline consultation’ which closed today (9th September 2015).

We were highly critical of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), and remain critical of any ‘pathway’ to death.

We are disappointed that on page 150 of the NICE draft guideline, it says: “Death is unlikely to be hastened by not having clinically assisted hydration”.

This is palpably untrue. If someone is unable to drink, not giving hydration will kill them.

We are also astonished that there is no mention of nutrition that we can see in the draft guideline.

We wish to remind NICE of the independent review on the LCP carried out by Baroness Neuberger and her highly critical report in 2012. It was particularly critical of the withdrawal of nutrition and hydration. Lady Neuberger said “the default course of action should be that patients be supported with hydration and nutrition unless there is a strong reason not to do so”.

That must be reflected in the NICE guidance if the public are to have any confidence in it.

In too many reported cases, elderly patients were sedated, starved and dehydrated to death under the LCP. Relatives reported being told in a matter-of-fact way that their relative was dying when they weren’t at all. You will be aware, or should be, of the personal testimony of Fiona Bruce MP about how her own father was treated. She was told he was dying, she moved him to a nursing home, and he recovered.

So we are also concerned that there is still a ‘pathway’ element to the NICE draft guidance. The whole idea of a ‘pathway’ leads one to question its destination.

The object of the exercise must not be to ‘free up beds’. Hospitals should be obliged under any NICE guidelines to give nutrition and hydration adequate for patients’ physiological needs at all times and regardless of prognosis.

There appears to be no structure in the draft guidance for a clinical decision on whether or not a patient is actually dying. Such a decision should be led by evidence, if there is no evidence, then the patient should be cared for as if recovery were expected.

We also believe the guidance should specify that a consultant doctor, not a nurse, should make every decision, in consultation with relatives, about treatment for vulnerable or elderly patients.

So finally, we question the very title of the draft guidance: ‘Care of the Dying Adult’. Is this a ‘dying adult’ or simply a ‘very ill adult’? Unless there is clear clinical evidence that someone is actually dying, such an expression should never be used. It risks making the outcome follow a hospital manager’s desire and is quite out of place in modern care.

We repeat that the public must have confidence in the medical profession. The LCP did much to destroy such trust. NICE has an opportunity to put matters right. It is an opportunity which we hope and pray is seized with enthusiasm.

 

Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)

Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.