Are vaccines killing people?

ONS figures in graph form comparing deaths among unvaccinated peopole aged 10-59 vs those vaccinated

Figures released by the Office for National Statistics show that those in the 10-59 age range who have had the second dose of Covid vaccine are around twice as likely to die from all causes as those who remain unvaccinated.

It comes as the papers are reporting that excess deaths are currently running at a higher level than usual.

Only today (25/11/2021) , The Times has reported: ‘The UK is suffering a wave of excess deaths not fully explained by the coronavirus, according to official statistics.’

The paper says: ‘There were 12,050 deaths registered in England and Wales in the seven days to November 12, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows. That was 1,719 more than the five-year average for 2015-19, or a 16.6 per cent increase.’

Vaccinated vs unvaccinated

Going back to the ONS analysis of vaccinated vs unvaccinated, when we posted this information yesterday on Twitter, the platform banned our link to vaccines.news for being untrustworthy or dangerous! But you can find the links below and judge for yourself. That is what freedom of speech is all about, after all.

Here is the raw data for week ending 24th September. Remember, these are deaths from all causes among men and women aged 10-59:

* Unvaccinated: 68 deaths out of 7,167,322 people, rate = 0.9 / 100,000
* Within 21 days of first dose: 4 deaths out of 231,831 people, rate = 1.7 / 100,000
* 21 days or more after first dose: 34 deaths out of 1,655,468 people, rate = 2.1 / 100,000
* Received second dose: 400 deaths out of 17,924,346 people, rate = 2.2 / 100,000

Going back to give you data from preceding weeks, and just taking unvaccinated vs second dose, for w/e 17th September it was 1.3 vs 2.2, for w/e 10th, 1.4 vs 2.7 and for w/e 3rd, 1.4 vs 2.3.  The rates among the ‘first dose’ group are around those of the second dose, being 2.4, 2.5 and 2.4 respectively. The graph we show at the top, compiled by Mr Berenson, is faithful to the data.  We have checked and so can you.

Alex Berenson, who wrote the original article, the one that Twitter banned, says: ‘I don’t know how to explain this other than vaccine-caused mortality.‘ (See the link to his article below.)

Control group

We can regard the unvaccinated as a control cohort here. The experimental cohorts, because AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna et al are still experimental vaccines, are those who have been jabbed, once or twice. And here we have to say, along with Mr Berenson, that nothing else can be causing the increased rates of death in these cohorts other than the vaccines.

An average increase of around 1.0 / 100,000 may not seem a lot, but if half of the 400 dying every week of all causes having received their second dose are deaths attributed to the vaccines, it means, if we do the maths, that 200 x 52, or over 10,000 people are dying prematurely every year in England alone. Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland will be experiencing the same thing.  So will countries across the developed world.  Low vaccine uptakes may well save the developing world.

Not in the mainstream media

The mainstream media, even the redoubtable Julia Hartley-Brewer at TalkRadio and the increasingly authoritative GBNews, are not yet covering this story, but questions need to be asked in Parliament and we provide a link at the bottom so you can email your own MP.

Here is the link the story in vaccine.news.

Here is the link to Alex Berenson’s original.

And here is the link to the Office for National statistics.

You need to download the data in xlsx format and then open it either in Excel or in Open Office (free) or some other spreadsheet. Go to Table 4. If you know your way around these programmes you can then sort the data by age-group, date and vaccine status, to make it more accessible. That is what we did to give you the raw data above. All our links open in a new tab on a computer.

To jab or not to jab?

In the meantime, you may have had a Covid vaccine and survived. Praise God.  The overwhelming majority do so.  But for those who are unlucky or outside the Lord’s gracious protection as stated here:

Psalm 91:5 Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; 6 Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday. 7 A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee.

… (and it’s interesting that the psalmist refers to a thousand and ten thousand) could fall victim to a vaccine-induced premature death. Yes, the psalm promises the Lord’s protection. So does our gracious Lord himself, to his disciples:

Mark 16:18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.

But he does not mean we should deliberately put ourselves in harm’s way. And on this ONS data, that is exactly what having the vaccine jab does.

Compulsory vaccination

We’ll just say a word about compulsory vaccination which Austria is planning and Germany considering. You would think those two countries of all others would recognise the disturbing parallels from history.

That is not to say the Nazis brought in compulsory vaccination. The Daily Telegraph ran that red herring on 19th November in an article by Justin Huggler ‘in Berlin’. Interestingly, comments were disabled, which is what the Telegraph does when it fears a serious backlash.

No, it’s creating in the public mind by relentless propaganda, (including by ‘nudges’) an underclass of citizens, a minority of course, who can be blamed for the ills of society, turning their neighbours against them, banning them from participating in social functions, preventing them from earning a living, treating them as ‘untermenschen’, subhuman, so allowing their legitimate human rights to be stripped away.

Governments can do this without compulsory vaccination. The UK Governments are doing the same thing, relying on their propaganda arms in the MSM, particularly the BBC, ITV and Sky ‘News’, to repeat and reinforce their line.

Nuremberg Code

However, the state taking away bodily autonomy is a violation of the Nuremberg Code.  The code was set out in a judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg after the Second World War. It laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out medical experiments on human subjects.  You can read a pdf HERE.

It says, in opening: ‘The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.‘ By implication, no-one can be lawfully injected or given a medicine against their will.

The NHS website says: ‘You must give your consent (permission) before you receive any type of medical treatment, from a simple blood test to deciding to donate your organs after your death.

‘If you refuse a treatment, your decision must be respected, even if it’s thought that refusing treatment would result in your death or the death of your unborn child.’

The only exception is for anyone sectioned under the Mental Health Act, as mental health charity MIND explain HERE

Personal autonomy

In an article in the Telegraph, former Supreme Court judge Jonathan Sumption wrote of ‘Those who refuse to be vaccinated’: ‘if they are not even allowed to decide what medical procedures they will undergo and what drugs they receive into their own bodies, then there is not much left of their autonomy as human beings. The way is wide open to despotism and unending social discord.’

He goes on: ‘A minimum of respect for the personal autonomy of our fellows is essential if we are to live together in any kind of harmony. These things are what make us a community. Governments which ignore them cross an important moral line, and inevitably find themselves engaged in a sustained assault on the humanity of their people.’

Tennis player Novak Djocovic has spoken up for bodily autonomy.  As RT reports HERE, the multiple grand-slam winner said: ‘[It] doesn’t really matter whether it’s vaccination or anything else in life. You should have the freedom to choose, to decide what you want to do. In this particular case, what you want to put in your body.’

’Instruments of state policy’

Taking the vaccine as a public good, to protect others, was the reason why school children were roped into the vaccine programme against the advice of the Government’s own Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. It’s still the argument being made to persuade those unvaccinated to take the jab.

The argument was made that unvaccinated people were putting others at risk. But now we know that taking a vaccine does not stop people catching the Covid and does not prevent transmission, that argument falls. And even if they catch it, it is said those vaccinated are far less likely to experience severe symptoms, let alone death.

As Lord Sumption puts it: ‘The absence of moral scruple in pursuit of what is thought to be a public good is the first symptom of totalitarianism. The reduction of human beings to mere instruments of state policy is the next.

‘The rest of us should look on and note how easily liberal democracy can be subverted by fear.’

Fellowship and earning a living

Just to conclude, every Christian knows that our human need of fellowship derives from the divine fellowship of Father, Son and Holy Spirit and is built in to our human condition.

As Lord Sumption says: ‘Social interaction with other people is not an optional leisure activity but a basic need of humankind.’

So is earning a living. Never before in human history has any government prohibited people from earning a living or designated some economic activities as ‘non-essential’. Yes, states have enslaved people, but never stopped them from working. The Bible says:

Psalm 104:23 Man goeth forth unto his work and to his labour until the evening.

The Almighty even describes the God-given ability to earn a living as his ‘gift’ to mankind:

Eccl 3:13 And also that every man should eat and drink, and enjoy the good of all his labour, it is the gift of God.

So from the very start of the Covid crisis, governments imposing ‘lockdown’ were acting against the righteous laws of God. And as in Austria today they are still at it. Much as it has been effective at destroying people’s livelihoods and depressing our natural immunity, there is no evidence that ‘lockdown’ suppresses ‘the virus’.

It may well be an expression of the politicians’ fallacy: ‘We must be seen to do something. This is something. Therefore we must do it.’

Let us let Jonathan Sumption conclude: ‘We are witnessing the ultimate folly of frightened politicians who cannot accept that they are impotent in the face of some natural phenomena.’

Prayer and Action

Mark 4:22 For there is nothing hid, which shall not be manifested; neither was any thing kept secret, but that it should come abroad.

Thank God for bringing the statistics on excess deaths to light through the ONS and Alex Berenson. Thank God for the witness of Lord Sumption. Pray for strength of character for sportsmen like Novak Djokovic to keep standing up for the right of all of us to decide what goes in our bodies. Pray that our politicians will take note of the ONS data and take action.

Use this link to the UK Parliament website to email your MP to ask the government if it will issue new advice on Covid vaccines given the ONS stastics showing that those vaccinated in the 10-59 age group are twice as likely to die from all causes as those unvaccinated.

We appreciate your support – without it we can’t do our research and help inform your prayers.
So click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings


Click on the social media links below to share this post:

32 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. Excellent article, Stephen, as always.
    Also, if I may, I will make use of your sterling work in ploughing through the ONS data, in order to extract these depressing nuggets of information. I am currently in the midst of writing a very long article about the dangers of the vaccines and the figures you give will be very useful … credit and link to CV, obviously!

  2. This is amazing! Real time evidence of what the truth regarding the vaccine is and how it is already damaging many. Clearly government does not want us to see the real time evidence but only what they see it is right to allow us to see.
    There is a bigger issue here: it is one of personal integrity of our leaders, and the population as a whole. This is clearly sadly lacking right throughout our civilisation, and not just with respect to our political leaders. They set the tone and we follow, and, hence we are becoming victims of this almost universal integrity shortage. The Judge quoted here has, mercifully, got it right. If this continues we will have no autonomy left even regarding our bodies. Interestingly enough the NHS website and others were ‘not found’ when I tried to click on to them. I wonder why?!!

  3. With reference to the “Control Group” paragraph above…
    a community organised Vaccine Control Group does exist:

    https://vaxcontrolgroup.com

  4. Once again CV nails it. A devastating exposure which should be taken up by every true Christian and cause an outpouring of action to stop this vaccine evil and a crying out to God in prayer.
    There are far too few Church leaders awake over this and the UK Church needs to do a massive U turn over its folly of tacit or even open endorsement of the whole vax process.
    If you want to do more than just write to your MP, join your local Yellow freedom group and join in on one of the many rallies that take place to raise awareness and challenge the demonic agenda. Ultimately though, we need Almighty God to get us out of the situation we and other countries are in.

  5. “Death rates per 100,000” what? If it’s per 10,000 total population, for both curves, then you’ve misinterpreted the chart. If it’s per 100,000 vaxxed and unvaxxed respectively, all well and good, as far as it goes.

    Assuming the latter, you still need to adjust for the differences in vaccine update in different demographics, especially age and presence versus absence of conditions that might cause death with or without covid.

    1. It’s 100,000 population of the cohorts, which are in the millions, as stated in the article.
      No, we don’t need to ‘adjust’ for anything, nor can we. It’s the 10-59 age group, vaccinated and unvaccinated.
      The ONS have not broken it down further, nor can we, so the data is as it is.

  6. Thank you Stephen

    I personally know of 3 people who have died within hours of receiving the so called “vaccine” and have just heard from a friend that she has had to move in to her daughter’s house to nurse her daughter overnight after she had a jab and now she has lost the use of her hands and cannot speak. In addition I met a man who had the jab in the morning, got chest pains in the afternoon and had a heart attack 2 days later

    Also, sadly, see https://nomoresilence.world/

  7. As far as I know adverse effects of the vaccines (a generalisation as there is more than one) are seen more in young people than old. On GBRadio there was an interview with a cardiologist who is seeing a rising incidence of heart disease, both from the vaccines and from the general stresses brought about by the contagion and all the misgovernment enabled by it. He also mentioned that colleagues were suppressing similar research results for fear of losing research funding from the drug companies. So much for “The Science”. It seems to me that there needs to be a community-driven campaign to find an *effective* cure for Covid-19, or an *effective* preventive – so effective that its benefits cannot be hidden. I do not see much effort being made to achieve this.

    1. Drug Companies: major tax contributors which therefore wield much power.

  8. On a similar note; I have had a reply from the Staffordshire coroner’s office, regarding the two deaths of students who attended St John Fisher Catholic College, Newcastle under Lyme, Saffs. As CV and mainstream media reported, the two deaths occurred close to their jab. The coroner’s office has said there will be no inquest. We now need to find out what the cause of deaths was in each case.

  9. Where to begin? Biological or mathematical?
    For a start, Alex Berenson has been fact-checked multiple times and shown not to be the most reliable writer analyst when it comes to interpreting the data relating to the current pandemic and vaccines. Whilst numbers don’t lie, humans do. As a mathematician, I know you can do practically anything with numbers to make people believe what you want them to believe with fancy graphics and bold statements. Even the very source of the stats (ONS) had a disclaimer over the statistics about how to interpret them a point that Alex totally ignored anyway.
    We all know the vaccination program was a tiered rollout. So when you look at the mortality statistics, you must take this into account. Alex didn’t and the statistics don’t give that micro breakdown. For the full data set that was published around the end of July this year, Fully vaccinated had barely reached the under forties group. The comparison between the two cohorts will be disingenuous at best. ONS even made that warning clear. It is also clear from other statistics that the vaccine is preventing serious disease. A common misunderstanding on social media posts states that 6/10 covid hospitalisations are with the vaccinated so it must be bad. Not so because they didn’t do the maths right. That is 6/10 admissions from 80+ % of the population versus 4/10 admissions from <20% of the population. That would actually mean an estimate of 6/80 vs 4/20 and that obviously favors the 6/10 (7.5% vs 20%). To summarise, you are far more likely to suffer hospitalisable covid infection if you are unvaccinated.

    Personally speaking, I am disappointed that this article was not more fully fact-checked before it was published as an opinion piece centering mostly on the opinions of Alex. I have no idea why but these last few years have seen disinformation seem fashionable and the Trump era has made it more so particularly in his last two years of office with everything covid. The rise of social media has made disinformation easy to spread and hard to correct.
    That also goes with how many Christians (particularly stateside) seem to believe the ridiculous ideas surrounding the vaccine. The whole narrative is not consistent. For years we have had vaccines and occasionally controversial yet when it comes to the current covid vaccine, all our previous knowledge of vaccines simply vanished.
    The repeated claim that this is not a vaccine or that it is experimental or even DNA changing is simply against known science, biomedical science. Those who do, don't know what a vaccine is or even how it is tested or even understand what DNA/mRNA is and what it isn't. The vaccines in use have been fully tested. Some imagine it cannot possibly be because it has only been a year. They don't know that time isn't the critical factor but people. In the past, we haven't had hordes of volunteers in every corner of the globe to test for that disease. This pandemic meant we have no shortage of volunteers. So numbers-wise, they have had more than enough from all possible demographics.
    Another critical point for misunderstanding is the components, all of which have been widely publicised. There are no hidden ingredients. All of those ingredients are common (to the body) biologically active ingredients that have a clear history. It isn't anything like a drugs trial where the substance is largely new and unrecognised by the body. The components of the vaccines are engineered to have incredibly short shelf lives as opposed to pharmaceuticals. We are talking about the realm of minutes to hours where it is metabolised. If you imagine any effect a fortnight or a month later, you are not seeing an adverse effect of the vaccine. All traces of the vaccine including the mRNA will have gone before the day or two is out. It is a precursor to an immune response, no more and that is what the purpose is. It is how the immunology of your immune system works.

    1. Firstly, even if Alex Berenson has been ‘fact-checked’ by pro-vaccine and pro-lockdown people that proves nothing. Our article is not ‘centred’ on his ‘opinions’. We only quote him once, when he says: ‘I don’t know how to explain this other than vaccine-caused mortality.‘ I don’t see you expaiming it either. In any case, we ‘fact-checked’ his graph against the ONS data and found it true.
      Secondly, what ONS disclaimer? What did it say? Here’s what the heading of Table 4 actually said:
      ‘Table 4: Weekly age-specific mortality rates by vaccination status for all deaths, per 100,000 people, England, deaths occurring between 2 January 2021 and 24 September 2021 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8.’
      I’ll grant you, in a note at the bottom they say:
      ‘8. For the 10-59 age group, the vaccinated population will on average be older than the unvaccinated population due to age-based prioritisation in the vaccine roll-out. As mortality rates are higher for older people, this will increase the mortality rates for the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population.’
      But it’s just an assertion. You would need a tighter breakdown of the age-group to verify it. Oddly enough, the ONS normally divide weekly deaths into five year bands. So why not when they do vaccinated vs unvaccinated? They could be right, but no-one knows because they haven’t divided the data.
      Thirdly, wittering on about what some people believe is a good try to smudge the issue but is neither here not there.

  10. The data at the beginning is not proof of the hypothesis. This is a really common statistical mistake to think it is. You can’t even say it is highly likely. Actually I’ve seen this error made recently in something else, so I will explain how it works.

    There was a survey to see which foods you eat are healthy and which are not. Each person recorded their diet and their health problems, and once the numbers were crunched, it turned out dark chocolate was one of the healthiest foods there is, but milk chocolate is one of the unhealthiest foods there is. So scratchy head time, why does adding milk make chocolate so unhealthy. The answer is it does not. What was happening was those who were health conscious were of a social group who think dark chocolate is a healthy thing, whereas your council estate, bangers and mash types will go for milk chocolate.

    Sorry to have to point it out, but I learnt a long time ago to be very careful not to blindly echo the information gleamed from the press. Yes I have been caught out a few times in doing this, so I know how it feels. This statistical error is one of those things used to fool people in just about every line of business. It’s one reason stats got a bad reputation. Stats is not evil, but it’s when it is used in a deliberately wrong way.

    1. That’s why we fact-checked the graph against the actual ONS data. And there was no hypothesis, just a question based on it

  11. Yes, the ‘vaccines’ are definitely killing people. They have nothing whatever to do with a health crisis but are all about depopulation and control. This S.A. physician explains the depopulation plan clearly:

    https://www.facebook.com/100050783922005/posts/470619027974224/?d=n

    The current ‘vaccines’ will evolve into the Mark of the Beast foretold in Revelation 13:16,17 and Revelation 14:9-11 (likely to be an RFID chip or quantum dot tattoo, currently being developed).

    All faithful Christians living in holiness and obedience will be snatched out of harm’s way before the actual Mark is introduced – could be any day now.

    1. Really appreciate your comment Linds, but you make lots of assertions which should probably each be prefaced ‘In my opinion’.
      The SA physician also makes a number of assertions, which I should like to see debated.
      Depopulation? Who benefits and how? Do not the elite need consumers?
      On your second paragraph, for those who cannot be bothered to read it, Rev 13:16-17 has the beast mandating the mark in men’s foreheads or hands in order to buy or sell while Rev 14:9-11 speaks of God’s judgment on those who receive the mark.
      Well, we have already had governments forbidding people from earning a living entirely, mark or no mark. The take-away is: ‘Don’t accept the mark, whenever it comes about.’
      Finally, on your third paragraph, we don’t do eschatology here, because Christian people interpret the Bible in different ways and it is immaterial to being a faithful witness and prophesying the word of God to our leaders right now. If the Lord were to return tomorrow he would want to know what you were doing for his Kingdom today.
      I’m not saying Christians should not live in holiness and obedience! We should, but to lay claim to the Biblical promises of blessings here right now for those who do that, not to be raptured at some time in the future. And that is not ‘salvation by works’. We are justified by the blood.
      But we need the blessings which come from obedience. It’s a very simple spiritual principle which applies to both individuals and nations. Among too many other references to mention:
      Psalm 1:1 Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. 2 But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. 3 And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper.
      Psalm 33:12 Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD; …

      1. This is what Alex Jone had to say about depopulation 12 years ago:

        This video seems to repeat itself, but it is worth watching what Alex Jones (in 2009) and the lady doctor say in the first few minutes:

        https://banned.video/watch?id=60a802f818295441e0eb99cb

        1. Call me naive, but I just don’t understand what the elite gain out of depopulation. Furthermore, I cannot see anyone who has explained that. If I am very much mistaken on that latter point, someone please explain it to me, with links and quotes, not more assertions!

            • Linds
            • Linds on 30 November 2021 at 23:04

            Stephen, obviously it’s difficult to find quotes from the globalist elite saying why they want global depopulation – because they don’t want their plan to be out in the open! If the masses were told that the Covid ‘vaccine’ is a bio weapon because the elites need to depopulate the world, no-one would take it!

            There are two reasons why the elites want global depopulation: (i) because “useless eaters” use up valuable resources which the elite want for themselves, and (ii) a smaller population will be easier to control.

            Regarding (ii), the antichrist’s one world government (aka the New World Order) will be a totalitarian system in which each individual’s actions (and thoughts) will be strictly controlled. This will be possible because the ‘vaccines’ will install an operating system into each human body, thereby enabling the elite to control the minds of those who survive the ‘vaccine’:

            https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/072/302/357/original/3a0f16908840e538.mp4

            *****
            Here are a few quotes and links about the need for global depopulation – I hope the screenshots come out in the comment box. (They didn’t!)

            1. Boris Johnson wrote in the Daily Telegraph on 25 October 2007 about the need for global depopulation:
            “The world’s population is now 6.7 billion, roughly double what it was when I was born. If I live to be in my mid-eighties, then it will have trebled in my lifetime… I simply cannot understand why no one discusses this impending calamity, and why no world statesmen have the guts to treat the issue with the seriousness it deserves… We seem to have given up on population control.”

            2. Stanley Johnson, Boris’s father (who would have been a strong influence on Boris), wrote about the need to reduce global depopulation in his book, ‘Life Without Birth’. In the introduction he writes, “If the number of new births cannot be reduced, the number of deaths each year must increase until the net growth of the world’s population is cut down to a more manageable number”. He then goes on to list “plague” as one possible means of achieving this.

            3. Bill Gates talked about the need to reduce carbon dioxide because of climate change (a red herring) in his TED talk called “Innovating to zero”. I suggest you start around the 3.30 minute mark and note particularly what he says at the 4.12 minute mark:

            https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero?language=en#t-286520

            4. The Georgia Guide Stones list the 10 commandments of the New World Order – the first one being, “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

            5. In his COP26 speech Prince Charles, while not explicitly calling for global depopulation, voiced his concern about the “growing global population creating ever-increasing demand on the planet’s finite resources”. He also apparently called for a global leader (i.e. antichrist) at the 2.57 mark, because he said the task would be too great for any of the leaders of individual countries:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuTzaCd_Suo

            Incidentally, Prince Charles is one of the main proponents of Klaus Schwab’s ‘Great Reset’ – the blueprint for the New World Order – see his website.

            *****
            For further information about the danger of the ‘vaccines’, I recommend you research the following (on Bitchute, Rumble and Odysee): Professor Dolores Cahill, Dr Lee Merritt, Dr Sherri Tenpenny, Dr Carrie Madej, Mike Yeadon, America’s Frontline Doctors, Reiner Fulmich, and Catherine Austin Fitts – to name just a few. There are many, many more top level doctors, lawyers, etc., warning about the depopulation and other dangers of the ‘vaccines’.

            *****
            I have to say that I was extremely disappointed that you wrote, “we don’t do eschatology here”, because I think it is impossible to understand Covid unless one has a knowledge of eschatology (apart from the fact that Jesus commands us to watch for his coming – Matt 25:13, Mark 13:35-37, Luke 21:36… so anyone who isn’t watching is being disobedient).

            The Covid ‘health crisis’ was manufactured (on the basis of the fake PCR test, which cannot be used for diagnosis) in order to introduce the ‘vaccines’. The Covid ‘vaccines’ are a precursor to the Mark of the Beast… which, incidentally, means that anyone who takes a Covid vaccine (or takes a Covid test or wears a face mask) is complying with satan’s agenda for the coming antichrist’s one world government.

            *****
            Finally, and significantly, The Bible warns us about the lie of Covid-19 in at least two places:

            – Psalm 120, which represents 2020 (see the book entitled ‘Hidden Prophecies in the Psalms’ by J R Church), says “Deliver my soul, O Lord, from lying lips, and from a deceitful tongue” – where “deliver” is the Hebrew word ‘natzal’, which means the same as ‘rapture’ (I was certainly praying for the rapture last year!), and

            – Revelation 18:23 – “for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived” – where the Greek word for ‘sorceries’ is ‘pharmakeia’, from which we get the English words ‘pharmacy’ and ‘pharmaceutical’.

            *****
            I cannot condense many thousands of hours of study and research into a single comment and could write much, much more… but that is probably enough to be going on with!

            God bless you, Stephen!

            • Stephen
            • Stephen on 2 December 2021 at 10:13
              Author

            Thanks Lynds, for your kind comments.
            Interesting points, so let’s consider them.
            I don’t see how your “useless eaters” use up valuable resources which the elite want for themselves. Firstly, the expression was used by the Nazis to refer to the disabled. There is no current campaign against the disabled, except in the womb, of course. But it’s not depopulation. So the expression in this context is, as one might say, useless. Working people mine and extract resources and act as consumers for the products of the elite.
            (ii) ‘a smaller population will be easier to control’? That is disproved by the widespread public acquiesence to Covid restrictions.
            How do the vaccines ‘install an operating system’ into the human body and how will people be ‘controlled’? Dr Charles Morgan did not explain that. Again, it’s done through propaganda, using the existing human operating system which cries out for leadership and reacts to fear.
            1-3 I knew about Boris and his frightful dad. Bill Gates in the video is another such fool. Net Zero is a bonkers idea, but the costs of it will impinge on the poorest hardest. As for his ‘reduce the population by 10% to 15% through ‘new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services’, being demonic does not mean it’s not cloud cuckoo land.
            4 I read that ‘The “Georgia Guidestones” advocacy of population control, eugenics, and internationalism have made them an object of controversy and conspiracy theories.’ And ridicule. They were built in 1979 (on whose land?) during the Cold War and I should say they were commissioned by wealthy Rosicrucians. But who knows? In any case, I think I shall join in the laughter in heaven on this one.
            5 Prince Charles does seem to get on too well with Herr Schwab, but I missed any call for a global leader at 2.57 or anywhere else. A debate is already happening between the advocates of Net Zero, who include a subset of depopulation fanatics dating from eugenics, even before the Club of Rome’s 1972 preposterous book ‘Limits to Growth’, and those who advocate adaptation to possible changes in climate.
            Once again, any of the folk you mention who warn about vaccines and link them to depopulation must explain exactly the links, who was in on this depop vaccine conspiracy (as opposed to just making money out of them). Too many Christians are too ready to jump on an attractive looking bandwagon which they think accords with their favoured interpretation of Biblical prophecy but which nevetheless has no wheels.
            As it happens, Mr Gates himself has explained how he reckons vaccines help reduce population growth in Africa (It’s always Africa. There are too many Africans for the elite, you see). It’s not a poison in the vaccines. He thinks that as parents vaccinate their children against childhood diseases they will see their children are living not dying so they will have fewer children. That’s all there is to it. But Bill, it doesn’t work like that…
            Lastly, with Bible interpretation, we need to ask how the original hearers would have understood the passage. How did Hebrew readers hear the word ‘natzal’? As ‘rapture’ or simply as ‘deliver’, which is the plain meaning?
            I have read elsewhere that ‘Mesech’ or ‘Meschech’ in Ps 120 refers to the Moschi, ‘a people inhabiting the Moschian Mountains, between the Black and the Caspian Seas. This is the area we now know as Russia’. No it isn’t, it’s present-day Georgia. And that was written in 2019, so there’s no excuse. But I see Christians doing this sort of ill-informed stuff, jumping to conclusions, making the Bible fit their preconceptions, all the time. It diverts our energy away from what we should be doing.
            Yes, in Rev 18:23 the translators rendered the Greek word pharmakeia as ‘sorceries’. Yes, we derive the word ‘pharmacy’ from it. That does not mean all pharmacy is sorcery.
            The Bible warns against lies and liars and deceit and ungodly princes and false prophets all over the place. That, IMHO, is where our prayer and witness should be targeted.

            • Linds
            • Linds on 3 December 2021 at 08:42

            Don’t scoff, Stephen – you might find you are fulfilling 2 Peter 3:3,4 – “Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers….” !!

            Here is the latest evidence I have found that the vaccines are designed to kill people. Watch from the 26.10 minute mark to hear Dr Noack explaining that the vaccines contain what he describes as nano size razor blades. The faster the blood courses through the veins, the more damage the razor blades do, which explains why so many athletes are dropping dead while exercising.

            https://odysee.com/@thecrowhouse:2/The-Pandemic-Narrative-Becomes-Even-More-Ridiculous:0

            • Stephen
            • Stephen on 3 December 2021 at 10:20
              Author

            No, demanding evidence is not ‘scoffing’. Someone comes out with preposterous, unsubstantiated claims and the one who says, hang on, that’s not true, is ‘scoffing’? Seems like carte blanche for false witness, that does.
            Firstly, it appears that Dr. Andreas Noack, days after making the claims about nano graphene hydroxide razors in vaccines, may have died in mysterious circumstances allegedly while being arrested by Bavarian police. So that is an odd twist to the tale. Like the mysterious death of Dr David Kelly in 2003, it arouses suspicions of whistle-blowers being taken out.
            However, which vaccines contain nano razor blades? All of them? Including Sputnik V and the ones made in India? If this were true about the nano razor blades, surely everyone would be keeling over, not just one in a thousand.
            According to Reuters, there is no graphene oxide or hydroxide on any vaccine ingredient list. Here is a list of ingredients. To introduce an ingredient which is not listed would require a conspiracy so large as to be, let us say, highly improbable and rather difficult to conceal. The vaccines are injected into muscle, not into veins.
            Is it not bad enough that the vaccines are made using a foetal tissue culture, that they are untested and unlicensed? Please can Christians stick to the facts and stop going off in all directions?

            • Linds
            • Linds on 3 December 2021 at 14:32

            You ask which vaccines contain nano razor blades: Dr Noack mentions specifically the Pfizer vaccine in his presentation. I have seen elsewhere that some of the vials have been analysed and found to contain only saline solution (no – I can’t give you a link – it would take me far too long to find it again)…. perhaps because ‘they’ don’t want everyone keeling over at once!

            As regards fact-checking sites like Reuters – how do you know you can trust them? Have you personally fact-checked the fact-checking sites? A while ago I checked Reuters – i.e. I followed the money that was behind it. I discovered that Bill Gates (who wants the whole world vaccinated) has vested interests in it…. so there is no way I would trust what it says.

            Stephen, I think you and I must agree to disagree agreeably – about lots of things! I shall now bow out of this discussion and wish you every blessing.

            • Stephen
            • Stephen on 4 December 2021 at 19:20
              Author

            Stay blessed yourself, Linds. If you ever wish to join Christian Voice, or anyone else out there is so moved, the link is up there on the bar.

  12. I’d like to say three things:
    1) A virus mutates until it has killed/infected as many as it possibly can, then lies low. If, as many suspect, the virus was constructed in a lab, then there’s no knowing how it will mutate. But being a virus, it will now Always be around.
    1) I don’t personally know of anyone who has died yet of the Covid jab of Any type, but I do know of at least 6 people who have had an extreme and ongoing reaction to it. My own husband has been steadily losing weight since having the 1st jab in early summer. Down from 12 stone to just over 9 stone with no end in sight. A friend knows of a man in his 20’s who immediately developed ‘the shakes’ upon being injected with the vaccine and other than divine intervention (which please pray for!) he has an extreme disease of the central nervous system which affects his life completely.
    3) The disease, Coronavirus, is contracted by both humans and animals. So you or I could be fully vaccinated but (eg) walking an infected dog in the park or stroking an infected cat and thereby spreading it.
    JEG

    1. Thanks for that Jacqueline. Don’t let cats sneeze on you is my advice. Ever.

      1. Very sound advice Stephen.

        1. And I didn’t mean to be flippant. What your husband is going through sounds horrendous or demonic or both. I suppose he has tried a body-building weight-gain regime backed by much prayer?

  13. Aren’t pro-vax campaigners missing the point? We were told, implicitly, if not directly, that these ‘vaccines’ were the slam dunk, get of jail free, risk free, absolutely fabulous, nothing can wrong, trust the science, the science is settled etc, etc and what we can see from the ONS graph is that the jabbed are dying from covid flu.
    Hang on, that was not supposed to happen. That was not what we were all bullied into believing was it?
    The so called vaccines were the wonder drugs, they were – Sunday Telegraph quote – ‘world beating’. The clear message from the bullying media, which has been relentlessly pro-jab, was that this was the magic bullet, the silver bullet, the slam dunk, yet we can all see from the data – which is from the government – that even if you have the jab you can still catch and die from covid flu. The big lie of the pro-jab lobby. was that the so called vaccines made you safe.
    The truth will come out; this will eventually blow up – and when it does there is going to be a huge outcry.
    Pregnant women who took the jab have given birth to still born babies, students who took the jab are dying – see the two students from St John Fisher Catholic College, Staffs, hundreds of sports people around the world are dying – all scrubbed from the mainstream media. In the UK I am told that Ofcom enforces a form of censorship, refusing any major outlet from reporting anything against the approved narrative. Now we have the approaching evil of unlawful vax coercion through passports – which are unlawful under Human Rights legislation and the Nuremberg Code, yes the Nuremberg Code – brought in to protect us from the Nazis. We now have to use it to protect us from our own authorities. Nothing speaks more loudly about the moral, ethical and scientific bankruptcy of the so called vaccines than coercion by the infliction of unlawful vax passports.
    A voice is heard in Ramah, lamentation and bitter weeping. Rachel is weeping for her children; she refuses to be comforted because they are no more. Jer 31:15.

  14. It’s everybody’s right to refuse a vaccine but nano razor blades being in them is just rediculous, the western world doesn’t have the ability to concoct a plan to depopulate the planet they can’t even get the power back on for people affected by storm arwen.

  15. Here’s a new bit of research from Sweden on the molecular biochemistry of the action of the vaccine on the nucleus of the cell. Apparently there was a debate as to whether one should develop an mRNA vaccine that manufactures the whole of the spike protein or just the tip of it. If it manufactures the whole of the spike there is a risk that it can enter the cell and damage the human DNA. DNA is a complex machine and one of the things it does is to repair itself so that it functions a bit like a computer machine with error correction. If this mechanism should fail it can cause DNA to reproduce with errors (cancer). There are certain genes in the DNA strand that are responsible for the different functions of the DNA and the one to do with error correction is the focus of this problem where both the virus and the vaccine are suspected of interfering with it, and the vaccine has done this in order to evade detection, hence the asymptomatic period where the immune system fails to trigger. Could this explain long covid? I personally do not know, but the link is from a reputable scientist as far as i can tell. He merely raises the possibility. No doubt more work will need to be done.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Unt03UBhbU

Leave a Reply