The ‘climate change’ industry, while posing with virtuous concern, is actually being used to undermine our rights to a free, prosperous and healthy family life. There are certainly reasons to be suspicious of the motives behind this all pervasive movement.
Psalm 127:3 Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward. (KJV)
Climate changes!
The climate has always changed as deep ice and tree ring records show and as abundant evidence from art and literature attest. During the Roman occupation of the first century grapes were grown in the north of England. By contrast, as reported by the BBC, on the Thames in the early nineteenth century revelers enjoyed a ‘frost fair’ for several days and the ice was so thick an elephant could be witnessed marching, “across the river alongside Blackfriars Bridge”.
Clearly, changes in extreme weather are a regular fact of history. We are, again, in the midst of a warm period similar to that enjoyed by the invading Romans and our native wine industry is reported to be making good business. That is as may be, but ordinary explanations for historic environmental change such as this offer no opportunity for exploitation. The morbid fear of imminent disaster generated by the ‘climate change’ cult and the freedom culling proposals offered to offset that fear are, on the other hand, an opportunist’s dream.
Imagine the means for control this movement, if conceded willingly, will afford the unscrupulous. Our freedoms will be all but abolished and draconian laws drafted and restrictions placed in terms of excessive taxation, freedom of movement, a carnivorous diet, market choice, energy consumption and of course the reduction or total denial of the right to reproduce. Such freedoms are already being eroded.
1 Timothy 4:3: Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. (KJV)
Children: blight or blessing?
In a sane society that affirms life and understands its immeasurable value, children are understood, without question, to be a wonderful gift of God. But in the climate change cult, children are a blight and not a blessing. As a result social media is seeing a steady rise in ‘anti-natalist’ groups who favor gradual decline and eventual extinction over the hopeful prospect of building a family. In another ‘trending’ BBC article we read how people like Nancy, a vegan and animal rights enthusiast, are adopting this nihilistic and morbid view. She groans:
“I feel that it is selfish to have children at this time …the reality is that the children being born into the world are creating more destruction for the environment.”
This antichrist spirit would abolish the blessing of children on an altar of false virtue. There are many defenders of this unseemly view and fewer more influential than the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. In the latest edition of British Vogue magazine (in which Meghan is guest editor) Harry rather emphatically endorses this spirit on his exclamation, “two maximum!” when asked if there might be more children on the way after little Archibald. As quoted from British Vogue, Harry went on:
“But I’ve always thought: this place is borrowed …and, surely, being as intelligent as we all are, or as evolved as we all are supposed to be, we should be able to leave something better behind for the next generation.”
Private jets for Sussex royals.
Well perhaps we should, but will there be much of a ‘next generation’ to leave something better for if this insanity continues unabated? According to unverified ‘palace sources’ the Duke and Duchess are speculating adoption instead of a second child, perhaps to ‘save the planet’ and offset the production of carbon-heavy human beings. Meanwhile, as reported in the Daily Mail, the Royals appear undeterred by similar qualms over private jets while taking back-to-back holidays in Ibiza and Nice.
Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. (KJV)
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! (KJV)
We’ll always appreciate your support
Click below to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings
Click on the social media links below to share this post:
Well said! Ecofascism gives the rich the opportunity to teach the poor how to be mean.
There really are none so blind as the Spiritually blind, which, of course, means that such people have absolutely no idea what is coming! Maranatha! Come, Lord Jesus!
GOD hates child sacrifice and terrible judgement is coming for this vile practice.
The replacement reproduction rate is about 2.1 children per couple (or woman).
The birth rate in Britain is about 1.9 (so the duke and duchess can afford to have a 3rd child.
The birth rate in the Czech Republic, where I live, is only 1.6 (we have 4 children).
The birth rate in Germany is a catastrophic 1.3! Mrs Merkel is importing Muslim immigrants with the naive expectation that they will work for the Germans! I can imagine that Germany will be a Muslim country by about 2050. The same might apply to France or even to Britain.
Apparently the world population is expected to reach a peak of about 7 thousand million at the end of the century.
There are vast areas of the world, e.g. the Sahara desert, Siberia or large areas of Canada, which are very sparsely populated. It is not beyond human effort and intelligence to make these areas habitable.
David Prentis
Here’s my take on all of this. No one is forcing you to read or listen to the BBC. Isn’t there a bit in the bible which recommends one should stay away from evil and general unclean influence, and instead to mix with what is good and holy? So the thing is that where I read long commentaries on a subject and keep getting told what the BBC reckon, i actually skip that text. I really do not want or need to know what the BBC reckon. I can go through life without it, and yet as i do, all around me are those with the bug.
One must fix oneself first before trying to fix other people. Actually, at the moment I’m benefiting from using channels of communication which extend beyond the narrow focus of this country and its beloved BBC. Youtube is my favourite because you get real experts on it who are independent. They do not have a BBC script to follow. So if you want to learn about the problems of climate modelling you can find mathematical experts to guide you without the spin. As Kippling said, “If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you”