The leader of the Green Party has said she would be open to discussing the possibility of legalising three-way ‘marriages’.
Natalie Bennett made her comments at the launch of her Party’s ‘LGBTIQ’ manifesto (That’s ‘lesbian, gay, bisexual, transggender, intersex and queer’ apparently) in Soho, London.
Ms Bennett said she was “open to further discussion and consultation” on the issue after being asked whether the Greens would support group civil partnerships and marriages by a Pink News reader who said he was living with two boyfriends in a stable long-term relationship.
She said: “At present, we do not have a policy on civil partnerships involving more than two people.” But since Green Party policy is made up by its members, all that could change overnight.
The Green Party is easily at the libertarian end of the spectrum on social issues, but fanatically authoritarian on anything the affects climate change, the environment, or animals. One of its policies is to ban rabbit hutches.
Ms Bennett was accompanied in Soho by fellow Australian and homosexual activist Peter Tatchell, a Green Party supporter.
Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)
Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.
Well, what can one say? Is anyone here really surprised?
On a tangential note, has anyone noticed the pictures of Peter Tatchell with his poster “Gays And Muslims Unite Against Hate!!”. As with so much of our so-called, much vaunted “progressive”, modern, “advanced” society, one doesn’t know whether to laugh or cry.
As for the latest demigogue, Russell Brand, ditto.
“Onwards to victory!! We have nothing to lose but our chains!!”
Have Bennett & Tatchell & co seen what thier ISIS Muslim allies do to gays?
I really don’t understand how sodomites and muzzies can unite together. After all, in muzzie countries queers are executed.
” Green Party policy is made up by its members ” .
And how do other parties produce theirs ?
I can’t imagine why they are embracing this policy. The number of votes in it must be tiny. If there is a partnership (or marriage) between a bisexual man and a woman in which a third man in the house is allowed to participate in some role, I would have thought it would be most convenient for all concerned to simply describe him as “the lodger”. Or it may be the sort of relationship where two sisters continue to live together, and the husband of one of them serves both to a certain extent, but why should they want the whole world to know exactly how much ?
What this has to do with saving the planet by not using too many plastic shopping bags isn’t clear at all . Do you keep the green belt looking nice, or do you build wind farms on it ? The Green Party is all things to all people, a most unstable coalition even before it gets tangled up with anybody else to wield more influence in Parliament .