Homosexuality & Trans

Home Homosexuality & Trans Page 20

Shares dive as Tesco sales slump

Tesco has recorded a disastrous Christmas after announcing in early November a £30,000 donation to next year’s divisive, depraved London ‘Gay Pride’.

Sales in the UK were down 2.3 per cent on last year at Tesco’s busiest time of the year.  The figures stunned investors and Tesco shares slumped 53.5p, or almost 14 per cent, to 331.6p, wiping more than £3 billion off its value.  (Those in the know did OK.  Tesco’s Chief Operating Officer was able to offload 50,000 of his Tesco shares a week before the announcement avoiding a £35,000 loss if he had waited.  Tesco say he holds 20 times that number of shares, but every little helps.)

By contrast, Sainsbury overtook Asda with like-for-like sales in the Christmas period up 2.1%.   Morrisons were up 0.7%.  Tesco was the only one of the ‘big four’ to see sales and profits drop.

The news follows a Christian Voice campaign of prayer, backed up by emails to directors complaining at the ‘Gay Pride’ decision and leafleting at Tesco stores.  Just before Christmas a panic-stricken Tesco announced that the 2012 ‘Gay Pride’ donation would be its last.  Hours later, in the face of a homosexual backlash, it had to clarify that gays and lesbians were really important and promise that it would support its homosexual contact group ‘Out at Tesco’ in other ways in 2013, which only made matters worse.

Stung by revelations that it dumped Cancer Research Race for Life days before its Gay Pride announcement, Tesco has now made Cancer Research its 2012 ‘Charity of the Year’, although it seems to expect its staff, customers and suppliers to do all the work.

Analysts are blaming Tesco’s ‘Big Price Drop’ idea for the store’s failure, which has led to them issuing a profit’s warning.   Natalie Berg, of consultant Planet Retail, said: “Tesco has taken its eye off the ball.  It has focused too much just on the price of food.  We now all expect high-quality food and everyone is claiming to be the cheapest – consumers are much more wary.”

However, it could fairly be said that Tesco took its eye off the ball even more when it bowed to pressure from its homosexual staff and associated itself with the ‘Gay Pride’ brand, with all its anti-Christian aggression, indecency, immorality and separatism.

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today:

‘Tesco’s announcement that it was giving £30,000 to Gay Pride came in early November and Christian Voice quickly mobilised prayer and action.  The action included emails to directors and leafleting at stores, making ordinary shoppers aware of the store’s support for depravity.  We were already disappointed with Tesco’s secret sale of fresh halal lamb and chicken, and their arrogant refusal to label it ‘ritually slaughtered’.  But the ‘Gay Pride’ decision was even more serious.

‘Our prayer – which we said ‘will humble proud Tesco’ – centred on a desire that the Tesco board would rescind the decision, which has not happened yet.  Indeed their announcement on 23rd December made matters worse.

‘However, bad, confused, initiatives have beset the Tesco boardroom.  Tesco’s ‘Big Price Drop’, launched in September, was destined to fail.  I believe God was anticipating our prayers, knowing from the action we were to take that our prayers would be serious, and that the Almighty was behind that disastrous decision.

‘On top of that, Tesco’s ‘Gay Pride’ announcement, made six weeks before Christmas, could not have come at a worse time for them.  It was madness to think that such brazen support for the tiny 1% of the population who are homosexual could have a positive effect.  As a result, thousands of Christians and other decent people boycotted the store at what should have been its busiest time of the year.

‘I now call on Tesco to repent of their arrogance before matters get worse and people lose their jobs.  Withdraw the grant to Gay Pride.  Apologise to the decent families upon whose patronage their business depends.  Deal better with your suppliers.  And label halal ritually-slaughtered meat so people can see what they are buying.’

Exod 10:7  And Pharaoh’s servants said unto him, How long shall this man be a snare unto us? let the men go, that they may serve the LORD their God: knowest thou not yet that Egypt is destroyed?

WHAT YOU CAN DO:

1 Pray that God will send repentance into the Tesco boardroom, and that they will reverse their grant to gay pride.

2 Boycott Tesco and encourage others to do the same (see (3) below.

3 Mount a witness with banners and/or give leaflets out to shoppers outside Tesco’s high street stores ‘Tesco Direct’ (they can throw you out of their car park, but you have every right to witness on the street).  Contact us for leaflets.  The text of the LEAFLET is HERE

4 Email/write to the Tesco Group Chief Executive, Philip Clark,  philip.clarke@tesco.com and their Marketing Director, Richard Brasher:  richard.brasher@tesco.com.  You can also write to their new Chairman, Sir Richard Broadbent, at New Tesco House, Delamare Rd, Cheshunt, Herts, EN8 9SL.  His email seems to be: richard.broadbent@tesco.com   (HERE is what one ex-Tesco-customer wrote.)

5 Sign our petition ‘Boycott Tesco’ and by so doing, record your decision to shop elsewhere.

6 There are a couple of other really effective things to do as well, but we shall let Christian Voice members exclusively know about them at the proper time through our newsletter which never goes up on the web!  For that – and/or to support us in this spiritual battle – you will need to Join Christian Voice:

You can send a donation if you do not wish to join:

TESCO – from the horse’s mouth

Now that the story about Tesco giving £30,000 to the debauched and aggressive 2012 London Gay Pride Parade (called ‘World Pride’ this year) is almost two months old, some of us have forgotten that (or even whether) they stopped supporting the ‘Race for Life’ organised by Cancer Research just days before announcing their cash for the gays.

Here is a bit of the confusion reaching us: Fred says: ‘Tesco has not stopped supporting Cancer Research UK, indeed 2012 is likely to produce the biggest sponsorship ever after £7 million in 2011’.  Another correspondent takes a sideways line: ‘£30,000 is not much out of Tesco’s total charitable giving budget.’

Last point first.  It does not matter how much Tesco are giving to ‘Gay Pride’.  If they made a charitable donation of £500 to the National Secular Society or gave £750 to the Euthanasia fanatics, or £1,000 to the abortionists at Marie Stopes, Christians and other decent people would be outraged, even if Tesco said ‘But we are giving £64million to other good causes’ (which is what they do say).

So what is the truth about ‘Race for Life’?  The Daily Mail stated on 11th November: ‘Tesco has triggered outrage by ending its support for the Cancer Research ‘Race for Life’ while deciding to sponsor Britain’s largest gay festival.
‘Tesco has worked with Cancer Research for more than ten years, raising hundreds of millions of pounds to help combat an illness that will affect one in three of the population.

‘The chain’s main contribution was support for the annual fundraising Race for Life, the UK’s largest women-only charity event, which has raised more than £400million for the fight against cancer since it began in 1994.

‘But shortly after Tesco announced the partnership would end, the firm said it would be a headline sponsor of Pride London.’

The Mail continued by quoting both Cancer Research and Tesco to back up their story:  ‘Cancer Research UK, which gave no sign of disappointment about losing Tesco’s support, is looking for a new partner for the Race for Life.

‘Emma Gilbert, who organises the event, said the partnership ‘came to a natural end’ for both parties.

‘But she added: ‘Tesco employees have taken part in events across the UK, raising over £7million for our life-saving research, and we hope they will continue to take part in the events.’

‘Tesco said it was in talks with the charity to support its work in other ways and would encourage staff to continue taking part in the Race for Life.

‘A spokesman said the decision to drop its support ‘is not connected to our £30,000 sponsorship for Pride, which is one of hundreds of community and charitable events that we will be supporting next year’.

So Tesco could not and did not deny that they had ended their support for Race for Life and days later announced the sponsorship for ‘Gay Pride’ (note how their spokesman leaves out the ‘gay’ bit).

We understand very well that one cannot take what this newspaper says at face value, and we uncovered some Daily Mail spin in their story about atheism at the BBC.  But letters and emails from Tesco have confirmed the Daily Mail’s take on the giant superstore.  An email dated 22nd November 2011 from Matthew Maycock, Customer Service Executive on behalf of the Chief Executive, Philip Clarke, said:

‘We remain very proud of the work we have done with Cancer Research UK and Race for Life. Since 2002 nearly two-thirds of our staff have taken part in or supported races, raising over £7 million. Though the nature of our relationship has changed, we will continue to support Race for Life in the years to come through the thousands of our staff that enter the event each year – paid for by Tesco.

‘We took a decision to support Pride London with a donation of £30,000 because our Out at Tesco network asked us to help.’

So there we have it.  The Mail’s story, and our story is true.  Tesco themselves have confirmed that they have indeed ended their formal support for Race for Life (‘nature of our relationship has changed’) and are now relying on their staff to take up the slack.  As to the London (Gay) Pride donation, they admit this was lobbied for by the demanding, anti-Christian Tesco homosexual contact group ‘Out at Tesco’.  It was rolling over when ‘Out at Tesco’ asked for a few pounds for their gay jamboree that has landed Tesco in this mess.  Tesco should have been strong enough and smart enough to have said, ‘Sorry, guys, we just don’t sponsor divisive political statements’.

We are distributing these LEAFLETS at Tesco stores and you can click HERE for other prayer and action, including the email addresses of Tesco executives.

 

Let’s do exploits!  Join Christian Voice today:

Tesco rattled by Christian Voice campaign

 

Outside Baker Street Tesco Express

Christian Voice has dismissed an announcement from Tesco that they will stop funding London Gay Pride after 2012 as ‘insignificant’. 

As the Guardian faithfully reports, Tesco have not backed down on their decision to fund the display of depravity.

Tesco dropped their support for Cancer Research ‘Race for Life’ in November 2011 only to promise £30,000 to the contentious July 2012 homosexual event days after. The Tesco decision not to fund Gay Pride thereafter comes after a month-long campaign of protest and boycott led by pressure group Christian Voice.

The Tesco announcement, which merely says they are not going to do something they never said they would do, has been met with fury from secularists, with gay activists spitting rivets on the homosexual online rag ‘Pink News’. Some have injected a note of realism, recognising that Tesco are still sponsoring London ‘World Pride’ 2012, but others are calling for a Tesco boycott of their own.  The anger from homosexuals even forced Tesco into yet another announcement, that they remain ‘fully committed’ to ‘gay staff’ and ‘practical benefits’ for them.

Christian Voice National Director Stephen Green said today,

‘Tesco haven’t actually budged an inch.  They are still determined to give £30,000 to London Gay Pride 2012 as they said originally.  And by announcing that they will continue to support their in-store homosexual contact group ‘Out at Tesco’ in new ways after 2012 they have made matters worse not better.

‘But Tesco are clearly worried.   Christian Voice led the campaign against Tesco on 18th November by providing our members and friends with target addresses and emails for Tesco executives, including CEO Philip Clarke and Chairman Sir Richard Broadbent.

‘We have printed thousands of leaflets pointing out the evils of homosexual practice and calling for shoppers to boycott the supermarket giant. Dozens of our members have been handing these out in the last couple of weeks.

‘I was pleased to see the Christian Institute pick up on our boycott idea a week before Christmas, but what is really important is spreading the message among those who do not visit Christian campaign websites.

‘That is why I and other Christian Voice members spent some time on the day before Christmas Eve leafleting shoppers outside the Tesco Express stores in Baker Street and Melcombe Street. 

‘In 2012 we need to step up our campaign.  Firms sponsor events, individuals or sporting teams to associate themselves with that product’s ‘brand’.  Stars lose sponsorship if their behaviour drops below a certain standard.  The ‘gay pride’ brand suggests not wholesomeness but depravity, immorality, drug use, aggression, division and religious hatred.  If the Lord blesses our campaign with more prayer and more willing hands, Tesco will be increasingly identified with the negative ‘gay pride brand’ throughout 2012.

‘We have also launched a petition and above all, last month we called for prayer for confusion in the Tesco Boardroom, for sales and profits to fall and for God to have the victory.

‘Confusion is now certainly reigning in the Tesco HQ in Cheshunt, with one inept decision after another, firstly dithering while Tesco’s Head of Research and Development, Nick Lansley, calls Christians ‘evil’ then annoying the gays with an unnecessary announcement while failing to placate decent people, and then trying to pacify the gays hours later. Christmas sales must have taken a knock to cause such panic.’

Tesco’s initial decision to give £30,000 toLondon’s aggressive, divisive display of political muscle and depravity was the result of intense lobbying inside Tesco from Lansley, a militant anti-Christian homosexual who filmed himself reciting the blasphemous Gay News poem and used his blog, on which he gave his full Tesco job description, to describe Christians opposing gay marriage as ‘evil.’

Stephen Green continued: ‘What made Tesco’s decision to bankroll Gay Pride all the worse was that they ended support for Cancer Research days before. They stopped saving precious lives in favour of propping up a deviant lifestyle.

‘It was good to find out last night that Tesco are rattled by our protest and were wobbling even as we were leafleting their stores.

‘It isn’t a victory in any sense yet, but it is an encouragement to press in harder with getting the leaflets into the hands of more shoppers in the New Year. Above all it just shows what power Christians can harness when they pray and act wholeheartedly in unity in a righteous cause.

‘The Governments’ decision to press ahead with so-called ‘gay marriage’ is suddenly looking rather vulnerable.

PLEASE CONTINUE TO PRAY that Tesco will back down, and that many more Christians will join our campaign to leaflet Tesco customers and spread word of the boycott and the reasons behind it.

 

                                                                               JOIN CHRISTIAN VOICE:

Tesco Head is Anti-Christian Bigot

12
Nick Lansley is the one on the left
Nick Lansley (left) in Tesco – photo on his google blog

LATEST: Tesco rattled by Christian Voice campaign

Nick Lansley, Head of Research and Development at Tesco.com, videoed himself reading James Kirkup’s blasphemous poem ‘The Love That Dares to Speak its Name’ and posted it on Youtube earlier this year.  He has also described Christians opposed to ‘gay marriage’ as ‘evil’.

The poem is a sickening account of a Roman soldier taking a prurient interest in the crucified body of Christ before gratifying himself in His wounds.

Nick Lansley is part of ‘Out at Tesco’, the homosexual contact group of the retail giant.  He successfully lobbied for Tesco to give £30,000 to London Gay Pride days after the firm dropped support for Cancer Research.  Out at Tesco were honoured by the previous Tesco boss Terry Leahy.

Tesco said:  ‘Mr Lansley’s comments and postings, made in a personal capacity, in no way reflect the views of Tesco.  Our values as a company are such that we abhor criticism of any religion, and we knew nothing about Mr Lansley’s comments and postings until they were brought to our attention.  It is not for us to dictate or limit those private views but we do not tolerate statements that insult others or their beliefs.  For that reason, when Mr Lansley was found to have posted material on his blog which insulted the religious beliefs of others, he was reminded of Tesco’s policy and the material was removed forthwith.’

Lansley exploits his Tesco connections in all he does (see the above photo and comments on his blog), forcing Tesco to say to another correspondent: ‘We are very sorry that anyone might have thought that there was any blurring of the boundary between his personal comments and his work for Tesco. We have therefore asked him to remove the comments, and he has done so.’

Lansley also recorded an event in June 2008 when the National Secular Society huddled in a London restaurant to celebrate the repeal of the Blasphemy Laws. During the secretive event Sir Ian McKellen read Kirkup’s blasphemous poem and boasted about ripping pages which speak against sodomy out of the Bible whenever he finds one in a hotel room.  (We aren’t linking to the McKellen video recorded by Lansley because we will not republish a blasphemy.)

Lansley’s own video was mysteriously pulled after it was linked with Tesco’s decision to splash £30,000 on the London Gay Pride next year.  If the Head of Research and Development at Tesco.com videoed himself or Sir Ian McKellen reading a poem about desecrating the dead body of Mohammed, would Tesco still say that was a ‘private matter’?

Lansley also embarrassed bosses at Tesco by an anti-Christian outburst on his profile page on the photo-sharing website, Flickr.com, where he lists his employment as “Head of R&D at Tesco.com”.  He wrote: “I’m also campaigning against evil Christians (that’s not all Christians, just bad ones) who think that gay people should not lead happy lives and get married to their same-sex partners.”  Following complaints to Tesco the remarks were removed.

Thousands of Christians have joined a Christian Voice campaign to boycott Tesco following the firm’s dropping of Cancer Research in favour of London Gay Pride.  The retailer’s Christmas howler comes after it was revealed they were secretly selling halal-slaughtered meat.

Tesco employees, especially Christians, cannot make a critical remark of the LGBT for fear of being sacked.  One of our members recently received this from a Tesco employee:

“Let me open by apologizing for my going through the absurd necessity of using a fake email address – my employer (Tesco) has been known to take action against members of staff who are identified as making any remarks online which could be considered derogatory. (This is advice handed out by our union, USDAW – never, ever mention Tesco on Facebook, Twitter, etc). I simply cannot run the risk that my real name would be associated with the comments I am about to make. (which is not meant to question your personal integrity, it is simply a risk I cannot take).”

Post Script: The Lansley left Tesco and is now an ‘Independent consultant’

 READ: Prov 8:13; 11:2; 13:10; 14:3; 16:5; 16:18; 29:23; Luke 1:49; James 4:6.

ACTION: including where to write and how to get hold of our anti-Tesco leaflet click HERE for our previous post on Tesco.

What Tesco is actually supporting, in all its anti-Christian amoral depravity (don’t view these videos if you do not have a strong stomach and pray for spiritual protection (get your Ephesians 6 Gospel armour on):

London Gay Pride March 2011: Public services, all three Armed Services, police, trades unions, American Airlines, prostitutes, Amnesty International join the aggressive gay lobby in this year’s show of strength:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5aohq3jms8
 
Soho Pride (Part of the London Gay Pride setup):  http://vimeo.com/25960835
   
 
Participants, including para-medics, in Manchester Gay Pride 2009, miming to singer Lily Allen’s song displaying contempt for anyone who holds a Christian view of marriage:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sWaTGLmppg 
Homosexuality continues to impact on public health.  Since Highly-Active Anti-Retroviral Treatment (HAART) became available for those with HIV in the UK, ‘gay’ men have thrown responsible behaviour, caution (and their condoms) to the wind and the number of people living with HIV will top 100,000 by the time you read this.  Each one costs the Health Service £18,000 per year, according to AVERT.  The total cost of HAART treatment is therefore £1,800,000,000 (£1.8 billion) per year and rising.
 Sign our Petition:

Join Christian Voice:

The “Gay” Culture War: It’s Nearly Lost

By Dr. Scott Lively

Many Christians are only now awakening to the seriousness of the threat to our society posed by the homosexual movement. But, unfortunately for us all, it is only the sounding of the victory trumpets by “gay” activists that has stirred Christians from their slumber. The watchman’s walls have been broken and breached, the village is in flames, and triumphal “gay” culture warriors are leading a long string of young prisoners by their necks into the woods. Most disturbingly, many of the captives, including some of the children of these still sleepy-eyed Christian parents, seem happy to go.

I have long warned that the homosexuals agenda is not about tolerance but control. It started, of course, with a plea for tolerance, but then immediately shifted to a demand for acceptance and in due time to celebration of all things “gay.”

It wasn’t enough, however, for prominent public officials in every major city to lead the “Gay Pride” parades. No, the agenda continued to unfold to another level, requiring forced participation in “gay” culture. Much of the country is on that cusp of celebration/coercion today, led by California with it’s new aggressive K-12 homosexual advocacy curriculum, mandated by law.

Even conservative Texas is not immune. Just this week Fox News covered the story of a ninth grader suspended from school for telling a classmate he believes homosexuality is wrong. The outraged teacher who demanded punishment for the boy reportedly keeps a picture on the classroom wall of two men kissing and frequently steers classroom discussions to the homosexual issue.

It took the intervention of a Christian public-interest law firm to get the school to rescind the suspension. But how many students of this same teacher have over the years simply assimilated his values as normal, their parents none the wiser?

Were the Nazis anti-homosexual? Far from it! Find out the truth in Scott Lively’s jaw-dropping book “The Pink Swastika”

More importantly, how many other classrooms across America are headed by such men and women? Their activist network, the Gay Lesbian Straight Teachers Network (GLSTN – later changed to “education network” GLSEN to hide the teacher/activist association) was powerful enough to launch its founder Kevin Jennings to the position of Obama White House “safe schools” czar for a time. I’d guess their agenda is an influence in just about every classroom by now.

I’m old enough to remember the debate about whether homosexuals should be allowed to be teachers at all, let alone allowed to punish students for disagreeing with the class-time advocacy of their sexual lifestyle. I remember the protestations from the pro-homosexual side, that “gays and lesbians just want the right to be left alone. They would NEVER interject their private lives into the classroom.” They all lied, and we believed them, and now our children and grandchildren are being forced to celebrate “gay” culture under penalty of law.

That is the end game for the “gays.” The final stage of their agenda, which has always been about taking control of things, is the power to punish dissent: to silence or crush their detractors. They only have this level of control in a few places yet, but they are moving fast to achieve it everywhere, and the momentum is on their side. And wherever they have it, they use it.

This brings me, in conclusion, to the subject of “gay marriage.” Huh? How does “gay marriage” in any way relate to homosexual propaganda in schools? Or to Christian parents awakening late to the indoctrination of their children?

It is the same issue, my friends. “Gay marriage,” “gay” curriculum, “gay” parades, “gay” TV shows, “gay” soldiers, “gay” adoption, “gay” diseases, “gay” recruitment and on and on. So many seemingly separate issues that are really just one issue: the unnatural, dysfunctional, personally and socially destructive phenomenon of homosexual sin. We are warned clearly and emphatically about it in the Bible. We have seen its corrupting effect in history. And we are literally watching its ethic of sexual anarchy supplant the biblical model of family as the guiding value system of our society.

I’m not going to add here how much I really love homosexuals and just hate their sin. As a question of public policy it really shouldn’t matter what I think about the perpetrators, just whether I am telling the truth about their agenda. I don’t want to reinforce the ridiculous assumption that Christians need to offer a disclaimer to prove they aren’t haters. It wouldn’t mitigate their hostility toward me for saying it anyhow. Trust me.

I’m not saying here that Christians are without hope of overcoming the challenge before us. Nothing, after all, is impossible with God. What I am saying is that we cannot possibly win, especially at this late stage of the game, if our “heroes” continue to fiddle about with the “definition of marriage” and fall all over themselves trying to prove they’re not haters by endorsing other, non-marriage-related bits of the “gay” agenda.

We need to stand firmly and unapologetically on the hard truth that homosexuality is not a benign, morally neutral social phenomenon. It is an insidious and contagious form of sexual perversion condemned by God as an abomination. I cringe even writing these words because I know the wrath I am inviting on myself. Still, someone needs to say this boldly and publicly because it is the truth, and only the truth can set us free of the political correctness that has imprisoned us until now.

The homosexual agenda represents an existential threat to Christian civilization and we’re in the final phase of the war, losing badly. It all hinges upon you, Christian reader. Either get into the “game” in earnest, immediately, or wave goodbye to everything good and holy in public life.

Dr. Scott Lively is an attorney, pastor and author of several books on the homosexual agenda, including “The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party” (co-authored by Jewish researcher Kevin E. Abrams).

BBC will need a miracle to change

BBC Broadcasting House

The Daily Mail has run a story about the BBC employing more atheists and non-believers than Christians after submitting a Freedom of Information request.

An internal BBC survey indeed found that just 22.5 per cent of all staff professed to be Christians, but 43% of staff did not respond to the survey.  The Daily Mail said the Christians were outnumbered by atheists and those of no faith, at 23.5 per cent, but that figure was arrived at by adding the professing atheists (8.9%) to those of no faith (14.6%).  Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Muslims and Sikhs totalled 3.2% while ‘others’ were 2.6%, and 5.2% preferred not to say.

The Daily Mail’s Jonathan Petrie said ‘the new research has been seized on by critics who accuse the Corporation of bias against Christianity and marginalising the faith in its output’.  He quoted BBC veteran Roger Bolton, who until recently presented BBC Radio 4’s religious current affairs programme, ‘Sunday’, as saying: ‘There is an inbuilt but unconscious bias against religion, fuelled by the fact staff are not representative of the public. It is not a conspiracy but it needs a correction.’

Amanda Rice, BBC Head of Diversity, protested that the figures had been ‘wilfully misunderstood by the paper’ and that ‘Of those who were asked about their religion, Christianity was by far the largest category, with 4,619 people.’

To put it all into context, the BBC employs 20,536 staff and they have so far researched 57% of them.  Sheryl Holland in the BBC’s Press Office told us: “Nearly 60% of BBC staff have been asked about their religion or belief and, of those, Christianity was by far the largest faith. That said when it comes to recruitment the BBC hires staff based on skills and experience alone. To recruit based on faith or religious belief would be unlawful.   As the majority faith of the UK, Christian programming is, and will remain, the cornerstone of the BBC’s religious output.”

The BBC is also frequently acccused of being staffed by 20-somethings but while the age-range is younger than the popualtion it may be argued not to be ridiculously so.  15% of staff are 20-29, 35.8% are 30 – 39, 31.4% are in the 40-49 bracket, 15.2% are aged 50-59 and 60+ accounts for 2.4%.

The Mail has certainly sensationalised the story, but it remains that BBC staff as a whole are unrepresentative of the population at large, where, according to the last census, around 72% claimed to be Christian, with just 15.5% saying they had no religion.  At the BBC, out of those who have volunteered information, 39.5% claim to be Christian, 15.6% atheist and 25.6% of no religion.  Other religions are similar to the proportions in the population.

Before the Conservatives won the election, their spokesman for culture said the BBC should actively seek to redress its “innate liberal bias”, quoting the phrase applied to the BBC by its former political editor Andrew Marr in 2007.

Mr Marr also described the BBC as “a publicly funded urban organisation with an abnormally large proportion of younger people, of people in ethnic minorities and almost certainly of gay people compared with the population at large”.

Now that he has been HM Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport for over a year, the Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP has done very little to sort out the ‘innate liberal bias’ at the BBC.

It is not only Andrew Marr who has raised his head above the parapet.  In October 2008, the conductor of the BBC Philharmonic Orchestra spoke of an ‘ignorant’ secular liberal minority in the media seeking to drive religion from the public sphere.

In January 2009, the Christian BBC presenter Jeremy Vine told Reform Magazine that it has become “almost socially unacceptable to say you believe in God” on the BBC.  He did not think he would be allowed to say that Christ is who he said he was on air.

In July 2006, a veteran BBC executive told a meeting called to address the problem of anti-Christian bias: ‘There was widespread acknowledgement that we may have gone too far in the direction of political correctness.  ‘Unfortunately, much of it is so deeply embedded in the BBC’s culture, that it is very hard to change it.’

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, responded:

‘It would be good to know the religious break-down of people in BBC top jobs, because it rather seems as if the Christians at the BBC have either a secularist world-view or little vision of how to turn the place upside down, as the early Apostles were accused of doing.  Putting the comments from Andrew Marr and Jeremy Vine together, it just seems far easier to be atheistic and gay than to be normal and Christian at the BBC.

‘The BBC’s atheistic staff bias becomes amplified in its programming.  For example, the Radio 4 programme ‘The Moral Maze’ regularly has atheists as 3 out of 4 of its panel. Only Melanie Phillips is allowed to articulate the views of the majority of the audience, who of course, are almost exactly as Judeo-Christian as the Moral Maze panel is atheist.

‘It is good that there is some religious programming on the BBC, and that Christianity is the cornerstone of it, but it is kept safely in its God-slot ghetto, from where a flagship religious programme like Songs of Praise is kept as bland as possible and is allowed to irritate but not seriously challenge the atheist status quo.

‘The real problem is not the lack of Christian programming, but the fact that no world-view other than a tedious atheist outlook informs normal programming content.  The BBC really should have the decency to acknowledge there are valid points of view other than the grindingly politically-correct anti-Christ atheism held by the majority of its staff.

‘Christians in soaps are always portrayed as weak, or stupid, or bigoted. Meanwhile, story-lines are concocted to introduce homosexuals whenever possible and to show favoured religious minorities in a good light.  We have had pro-lifers as terrorists.

‘While the BBC’s natural history programming is often inspiring, it is impossible for a wildlife programme to look objectively at the wonder of nature. The audience are treated like small children in a school-room, always having to be reminded that the animals ‘developed’, ‘evolved’, or ‘appeared’.

‘When the BBC decided to make a programme about language, they had to get the anti-Christian atheist homosexual Stephen Fry to present it.

‘When they wanted to look at anthropology, it was only natural to them to seek out the fanatical evolutionist Dr Alice Roberts. In ‘The Origins of Us‘ we had vacuous subjective claims that our ape-like ancestors apparently miraculously (something in which perhaps only a minority at the BBC would believe) decided to walk upright in search of food as they surveyed the African savannah, and that our tools moulded the shape of our hands, rather than the other way around. The lack of objectivity and the amount of unfounded speculation makes such programmes rather silly but the BBC’s atheist oligarchy press on regardless.

‘The vision of Lord Reith was of a BBC which would elevate viewers with whatever things were pure, lovely and of good report and to promote virtue. He set this vision in stone.

‘As they shuffle past the declaration in the entrance to Broadcasting House, the atheists in charge at the BBC seem intent on promoting the very opposite. An opportunity to sneer at Christianity or Christians is rarely allowed to pass.

‘Obviously the BBC will have no overt recruiting policy that puts Christians at a disadvantage.  It is more subtle than that.  The BBC simply appears to be a self-perpetuating atheist oligarchy, and it will take a miracle akin to that of those fabled ancestors walking upright before there is any change.’

PRAY: For the BBC’s Christians to be given faith in the conquering King of kings and courage to stand up for all they believe.  Pray for a miracle in the management, that God would be honoured once again so that the words inscribed in the Broadcasting House entrance hall would become an inspiration.

The Broadcasting House Inscription, set in Latin for all to see, above a statue of ‘The Sower’:

DEI OMNIPOTENTI TEMPLUM HOC ARTIUM ET MUSARUM ANNO DOMINI MCMXXXI RECTORE JOHANNI REITH PRIMI DEDICANT GUBERNATORES PRECANTES UT MESSEM BONAM BONA PROFERAT SEMENTIS UT IMMUNDA OMNIA ET INIMICA PACI EXPELLANTUR UT QUAECUNQUE PULCHRA SUNT ET SINCERA QUACUNQUE BONAE FAMAE AD HAEC AVREM INCLINANS POPULUS VIRTUTIS ET SAPIENTIAE SEMITAM INSISTAT.

Translation:

‘To Almighty God this shrine of the arts, music and literature is dedicated by the first Governors in the year of our Lord 1931, John Reith being Director General. It is their prayer that good seed sown will produce a good harvest, that everything offensive to decency and hostile to peace will be expelled, and that the nation will incline its ear to those things which are lovely, pure and of good report and thus pursue the path of wisdom and virtue’.

Photos of the entrance hall to Broadcasting House: As originally built, showing the Inscription / As it is today

Pray for Belize to stand firm

The flag of Belize

A Constitutional challenge has been mounted in Belize to the laws which currently make unnatural acts a criminal offence.  A preliminary hearing is scheduled for early in December (2011).  We are calling for a mobilization of the church in prayer across the world for our brethren in Belize.  If Belize is rolled over by the homosexual juggernaut, the rest of the Caribbean could easily follow.

 The Constitution of Belize (formerly British Honduras) was settled in 1981.  It acknowledges the supremacy of God, stresses human rights, freedom and the family.  No-one has claimed before now that men suddenly have an inalienable right to commit acts of sodomy and gross indecency under it, especially as it says: ‘freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and upon the rule of law’.

 The law suit has been filed by an organisation called UNIBAM.  UNIBAM is short for United Belize Advocacy Movement, which hides behind concern about HIV/AIDS but is nothing more than a shameless homosexual rights group.  UNIBAM’s court case is fronted by the former UK Labour Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith QC, and has drawn condemnation from churches in Belize.

 There has been outrage in Belize at the grant of a substantial sum of money to UNIBAM by the Embassy of the United States of America.

 The US Embassy website admits that its grant to UNIBAM is for pro-gay propaganda.  In their own words, the project: ‘will increase public awareness about homophobia while creating a safe space for HIV prevention work. The organization will organize a national debate on homophobia and human rights. Other initiatives will include the distribution of wrist bands to raise awareness of the issue, prevention education sessions among LGBT population, and the airing of public service announcements.’  View HERE.

 Both UNIBAM and another pro-gay group, the Alliance Against Aids (AAA) are totally funded from abroad.  The people of Belize themselves are overwhelmingly opposed to homosexuality.  In the case of AAA, their money comes mainly from HIVOS, the wealthy Dutch Humanist body.  Caleb Orozco, the founder and head of UNICAM, claims to have “‘friends in high places’ politically and in the media.” Homosexual View HERE.

 UNIBAM has also received money from the United Nations Population Fund UNFPA (see page 7 of this link):

 The churches in Belize are mobilizing, having filed an application to join the action.  They have held a seminar, and Belize Action has been set up to oppose UNIBAM.

 Dean Barrow, the Prime Minister of Belize, has come out against the move, according to a report from the ‘gay travelers network’, who are very interested in having a new exotic location in which to corrupt local youth for a dollar or two.  The same website reveals that, astonishingly, the Commonwealth Lawyers Association is backing UNICAM:

 Here is the CLA ‘About us’ page: http://www.commonwealthlawyers.com/AboutUs.asp#Secretariat

 Even this pro-gay BMJ article reveals that homosexual practices are dangerous and unsanitary.  For a more detailed look, supported by research done by homosexual doctors, this scholarly article shows the implications for health and morals in Belize from decriminalising these acts of perversion. 

 Meanwhile, right across the Caribbean Sea in Barbados, Wikipedia is wittering on about ‘LGBT rights’ or the lack thereof,  the Attorney General is laying down the law, but Ambassador to the USA John Beale is sounding a bit wet, while some dreadful fat lesbian wants Barbados to cash in on gay sex tourism.  

 African nations have reacted with fury and defiance to pressure from David Cameron and other leaders of decadent Western nations to decriminalise sodomy. Nigeria is poised to outlaw gay marriage, according to The Guardian (UK).  A more balanced and informative article was in the Nigeria Sun newspaper.  The British High Commissioner in Lagos, Andrew Lloyd, is furious.  ‘Britain and other western countries would not tolerate any law that prescribes punishment for gays’, said Mr Lloyd.

 Despite what the Guardian says about other African countries scrapping anti-gay laws, it’s all the other way.  Zambia and Zimbabwe have said they will not enact gay rights, according to a UK homosexual paper.  (Although we cannot imagine what possessed Morgan Tsvangirai to say he now believes ‘gay rights are human rights’.)

 Ghana’s President John Atta Mills said he will never enact laws which will ‘destroy the moral fibre of society’, while John Nagenda of the Ugandan Presidential Office said “Uganda is, if you remember, a sovereign state and we are tired of being given these lectures … “If they must take their money, so be it,” he concluded.

Malawi’s governmental spokesperson Patricia Kaliati said that it was “unfortunate” that Britain was considering “pro-gay strings” to aid, adding that homosexual acts are illegal in Malawi.  She noted that such laws are a legacy of British rule, reported Nyasa Times, but the laws were and are entirely consistent with African moral values, even though Britian is now sinking into a swamp of immorality and perversion, where homosexuals are now persecuting Christians.

Tanzania’s foreign affairs minister Bernard Membe said: “Tanzania will never accept Cameron’s proposal because we have our own moral values. Homosexuality is not part of our culture and we will never legalize it.  Tanzania is ready to end diplomatic ties with Britain if it imposes conditions on the assistance it provides to pressurize for adoption of laws that recognize homosexuality.  We are guided by our tradition. We have families of a mother, a father and children. What Cameron is doing might lead to the collapse of the Commonwealth.”

The President of Zanzibar, Ali Mohamed Shein, said that Islamic and Zanzibari culture abhors gay and lesbian activities. “We cannot compromise our deeply rooted culture or [allow] something which [is] completely against our religion. Let them cut off aid,” he said.

 The fact is, the UK has to get rid of its aid budget, which is not so much about helping poorer nations as making our politicians look good.  If mothers die in childbirth in an African nation because the UK denied that country aid on a gay whim, it will not look good on David Cameron’s CV.  So their ‘lectures’, as Uganda described them, are mere posturing.

 But back to the subject.  The threat to Belize is real.  Please pray for the Church in Belize to be granted wisdom, resources and favour with the judges, pray for confusion in the homosexual camp, and please sign our Save Africa from Sodomy Petition (if you have not already done so).

 

 

Prayer will humble proud Tesco

Boycott Tesco and email their Chief Executive. Remember: Every Little Helps!

Or to put it more accurately, God will humble proud Tesco, in answer to prayer.

As the Daily Mail has reported, retail giant Tesco have stopped sponsoring Cancer Research UK and switched their support to that annual display of aggression and depravity, London Gay Pride.  But the Bible says: When pride cometh, then cometh shame (Prov 11:2).

 

Tesco’s idea of family – sad body-building homosexuals obessessed by looks and the male anatomy

Mr Richard Littlejohnsaid: ‘If gays want to dress up as Carmen Miranda or mince up and down The Mall in nothing but their knickers, that’s fine by me. But why would Britain’s biggest supermarket want to be associated with such an event, at the expense of cancer victims?’ 

And this is on top of Tesco secretly selling halal lamb and chicken to unsuspecting shoppers.

There are five important and effective things Christians can do:

1 Pray that God will send repentance into the Tesco boardroom, and that they will reverse their grant to gay pride..

2 Boycott Tesco and encourage others to do the same.

3 Mount a witness with banners and/or give leaflets out to shoppers outside Tesco’s high street stores ‘Tesco Direct’ (they can throw you out of their car park, but you have every right to witness on the street).  Contact us for leaflets.  The text of the LEAFLET is HERE

4 Email/write to the Tesco Group Chief Executive, Philip Clark,  philip.clarke@tesco.com and their Marketing Director, Richard Brasher:  richard.brasher@tesco.com.  You can also write to their new Chairman, Sir Richard Broadbent, at New Tesco House, Delamare Rd, Cheshunt, Herts, EN8 9SL.  His email seems to be: richard.broadbent@tesco.com   (HERE is what one ex-Tesco-customer wrote.)

5 Sign our petition ‘Boycott Tesco’.  Make sure you right-click and then open it in a new tab or window to keep this page on-screen.

 

  There are a couple of other really effective things to do as well, but we shall let Christian Voice members exclusively know about them at the proper time through our newsletter which never goes up on the web!

Aggressive and depraved - London Gay Pride

Tesco’s spin centres on ‘diversity’ as an ‘inclusive store’ – they even have an ‘Out at Tesco’ webpage promoting sodomy amongst their employees and a page commending staff for taking part in the 2010 parade – and ignores the fact that Gay Pride is a provocative and aggressive display of indecency and perversion.  For all their posturing, would Tesco actually like a gay pride march through one of their stores?  And if they are really interested in diversity, will they be sponsoring the ex-gay movement?  Don’t hold your breath.

If you can bear it, here is a video link of Soho Pride, part of the London set-up in 2008.  And it that was not enough, here is a video link showing just what the gentle, tolerant gays and their supporters think of those who disagree with them with music from someone called Lily Allen.  Thanks, Anglican Mainstream.

Tesco have denied that sponsoring gay pride was at the expense of Cancer Research, but the facts are that Tesco’s support for the annual fundraising Race for Life, the UK’s largest women-only charity event, helped Cancer Research raise more than £400million for the fight against cancer since it began in 1994.

Tesco announced it would be a headline sponsor of Pride London just days after ending their partnership with Cancer Research.  Tesco’s Head of Research and Development, a militant anti-Christian homosexual called Nick Lansley, lobbied hard for that decision. 

Here at Christian Voice we have a soft spot for cancer charities ever since Maggies Centres courageously turned down tainted money from the blasphemous Jerry Springer the Opera in 2006 and were rewarded by making far more from the publicity around that decision than what they would have received from the show.  Why on earth should Tesco think that dumping a cancer charity to take up with Gay Pride is a clever (even a good commercial) decision?

The militant atheist magazine Freethinker helpfully points out that the Co-op sponsor Manchester Gay Pride (as well as throwing Christian Voice out of their bank) and that ASDA’s parent Wal-Mart give benefits to gay partners of employees in the USA.  Unless ‘Christian fundies want to starve themselves’, they chuckle, ‘they better (sic) start thinking fast of joining the grow-your-own movement’.

Well that’s a good idea in itself, but have they forgotten Sainsbury, not to mention your local shops?  In addition, as we pointed out in our video on the supermarkets and halal, if you want to be sure of avoiding halal-slaughtered fresh meat, just shop at M&S or Morrisons.

Some words from Proverbs and from Mary on the subject of pride to inform your prayer.  Remind the Lord of his word as you pray:

Prov 8:13  The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.
Prov 11:2  When pride cometh, then cometh shame: but with the lowly is wisdom.
Prov 13:10  Only by pride cometh contention: but with the well advised is wisdom.
Prov 14:3  In the mouth of the foolish is a rod of pride: but the lips of the wise shall preserve them.
Prov 16:5  Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the LORD: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished.
Prov 16:18  Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
Prov 29:23  A man’s pride shall bring him low: but honour shall uphold the humble in spirit.

Luke 1:49 For he that is mighty hath done to me great things; and holy is his name. 50 And his mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation. 51 He hath shewed strength with his arm; he hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. 52 He hath put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low degree.

James 4:6  Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.

                                                                                            Join Christian Voice:

Homosexuals hold sway in Ireland

 

Eamon Delaney

All the unsuspecting man did was write a column headed:

‘Loud and proud gays want to take over rest of society’

Eamon Delaney said ‘Increasingly, it seems as if the homosexual community has forgotten that it is the minority’ with its demands for gay marriage, adoption, children’s birth certificates falsified to show two ‘mothers’ or two ‘fathers’, etc, etc.

And it is as if the wrath of Juno has landed on his head.  The column, in the Irish Independent, attracted over 500 comments in a week, the vast bulk of them adverse.

Just google ‘Eamon Delany gay’ and see how viral the whole thing went.  But some are standing up for him, with the Irish Iona Institute (not to be confused with a similar sounding body this side of the Irish Sea) among the best.

This is in a country which did not even legalise sodomy until 1995.  Just sixteen years later and righteousness cannot even raise its voice, just like Lot in Sodom.  And look at what is happening in the UK.

What a lesson to African and Caribbean countries to keep their anti-sodomy laws, as Shirley Richards has pointed out in a very articulate and well-researched article in the Jamaica Gleaner.

If you let the camel get his nose inside the tent, pretty soon you have the unwelcome company of his backside.

Stonewall ‘cowards’ call Melanie Phillips ‘Bigot of the Year’

The respected journalist Melanie Phillips has been congratulated by Christian Voice on her award of ‘Bigot of the Year’ by the Stonewall homosexual lobby group.  But we have accused Stonewall of cowardice for not inviting any of those shortlisted to their awards dinner last night.

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, was also shortlisted for the award for his comments about Elton John’s designer baby and for championing the right of African nations to keep sodomy as a criminal offence.

The others shortlisted on the Stonewall website were the Rt Rev Arthur Roche, Scottish Section 28 campaigner Sir Brian Souter and Bill Walker MSP.  Not one of those shortlisted was actually invited to the awards ceremony and dinner, an omission described as a ‘grave discourtesy’ by Christian Voice.

Stephen Green said today:

‘It was a great honour to be shortlisted for Stonewall’s ‘Bigot of the Year’ award and I am disappointed not to have won.  I really must put more effort into opposing the gay rights lobby before next year’s event.  All the same, I congratulate Melanie Phillips for her winning position of standing up for the right of children not to be abused by Stonewall-devised homosexual imagery in sex education.

‘Yesterday I described Stonewall’s failure to invite those shortlisted for such an important award as a grave discourtesy.  I expressed disappointment that a group which has, as I put it, “such lofty ideals as the promotion of buggery and gross indecency” should be so lacking in the fundamentals of social intercourse.

‘When any public body holds an awards ceremony, they invite those shortlisted for each award as a courtesy.  But ‘Bigot of the Year’ is not a serious award, it is merely an attempt by the homosexuals to bully and humiliate someone in public life.  Chris Grayling MP, Jan Moir and the Earl of Devon have been on the receiving end in previous years for imagined slights against homosexuals.

‘However, the last thing a bully wants is for their victim to stand up and give them a taste of their own medicine.  Stonewall don’t actually have the courage to invite those shortlisted for fear that the winner might tell the assembled gays a few home truths.  They daren’t risk that.  Like all bullies, they are cowards.

‘The Nationwide Building Society sponsor the Stonewall annual awards dinner, which does not stop the greedy gay group from charging those attending £180.00 a ticket.

‘The ‘Bigot’ award ought to be an embarrassment to them and that may be the reason why they don’t mention it when patting themselves on the back on their company website

‘I call on Nationwide to apologise to those whom Stonewall has accused of ‘bigotry’ or state that they approve of bullying and humiliating public figures and the cowardice of not allowing them to answer back.’

Members can email the Nationwide Chief Executive, Graham Beale, on gjbeale2@nationwide.co.uk to put these points to him or phone 01793 513 513 (then say the name “Graham Beale”).

A number of our members are threatening to withdraw their funds from Nationwide.  It is a good idea to leave £100 in.  Anyone who has savings of £100 or more with Nationwide, or whose mortgage is with Nationwide, is entitled to attend their annual general meeting the next one of which will be held in July 2012.

Edmund Burke Would Not Be Pleased

Edmund Burke

On this very day (4 November) in 1789, the Frenchman Charles-Jean-François Depont wrote to Edmund Burke MP, requesting that he endorse the Revolution that had just broken out in France.

Burke’s response to Charles-Jean turned into one of the most celebrated political tracts in history, and for good reason. Not only did Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France become a pillar of conservative political thought, but it stands alongside the works of Shakespeare and the King James Bible as being the greatest literary achievement in the English language.

Christian Voice did a biography of Edmund Burke in our January 2010 newsletter as part of our ongoing series of Christian heroes. (To join Christian Voice and receive our monthly newsletter, click HERE.) We explored Burke’s idea that true freedom can only be preserved by reverencing our ancestors. This is because liberty is not, according to Burke, a natural right of man but the product of tradition, family, and faith. As such, liberty is passed on in much the same way that property is transmitted, from one generation to another through inheritance.

To support this notion of liberty as an inheritance, Burke pointed to the great freedoms of the British tradition, showing that they had accumulated over a period stretching back to the Declaration of Rights, the Magna Charta and the entire network of common law freedoms preserved by the hereditary monarchy. He warned that the legacy of these liberties would not long abide a generation that was willing to cast off the heritage of their ancestors. At the same time, however, Burke did not advocate a static traditionalism; rather, whenever he wished to reform, it was in order to conserve. He understood the wisdom of Proverbs when it says, “Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set” (Prov. 22:28) and “My son, fear thou the LORD and the king: and meddle not with them that are given to change: For their calamity shall rise suddenly; and who knoweth the ruin of them both?” (Prov. 24:21-22)

If Burke had lived long enough to see our own age, I do not think he would be pleased. We live at a time when the common law foundations that have been transmitted to us by our ancestors are under constant attack. Consider that

  • The previous Government discussed a blueprint for “sweep[ing] away centuries of tradition”  by turning the House of Lords into an elected chamber.
  • In the last part of the 20th century and early 21st century, Government pared down our Common Law freedoms at an astonishing rate, including the right not to be punished until a court has decided that the law has been broken, the right to private communication, the right to trial by jury, the right to silence, the right to demonstrate and protest, the right to travel without surveillance and the presumption of innocence. (See Robin Phillips’ article,  ‘The Orwellian Legacy of Tony Blair‘)
  • In 2008, the BBC reported that the Justice Secretary was considering replacing the British constitution with a written document like that possessed by the United States.
  • In April 2007, Parliament functionally nullified key aspects of the Magna Carta in order to meet the demands of homosexual activists. (See Scott Lively’s article ‘Requiem for the Magna Carta.‘)

Edmund Bruke would not be pleased by these developments. In fact, in his critique of the revolutionary mentality, he warned against this very thing. He cautioned against overturning years of established precedent to meet the demands of the latest fad.

Burke would also not be pleased by the way the present Government has taken it upon itself to challenge centuries of Common Law by suggesting that the rules regulating the succession of the British throne should be changed. (See our earlier article ‘Christian Voice Takes Stand For Male Primogeniture‘.) The campaign against male primogeniture is only one example of our leaders pandering to those who are “given to change” or attempting to remove “the ancient landmark” that Proverbs 22:28 enjoins us not to remove. Some translations refer to this as a ‘boundary stone’, bringing to mind the image of a person trying to increase his property through dishonest manipulation. However, more is at stake in this verse than mere property rights, a point made by Duane Garrett in his commentary on Proverbs:

“To move a boundary stone was to attempt to seize land furtively. More is involved here, however, than real property. The boundary stone represented the ancient constitution of Israel, and to violate that heritage was to undermine the distinctive character of the land in Israelite society.

In our day, no less than in ancient Israel, there are those who are attempting attempted to tamper with our Christian Constitution, and undermining the distinctive character of our land in the process. Let us join our voices with those of Burke in opposing such innovations.

Join Christian Voice

Christian Voice is a prophetic ministry in the ‘forthtelling’ sense for those Christians who are fed up with the way things are, have had enough of secularist politicians imposing wickedness on the rest of us and who are not satisfied with trying to get ‘Christian influence in a secular world’ because they know ‘The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof; the world and they that dwell therein’ (Psalm 24:1). If you want instead to lift high the Crown Rights of the King of kings, you have found the right place!

Membership Application

  • Yes, I/we wish to join Christian Voice. (Husband and wife may join as one)
  • I/we unreservedly support the aims of Christian Voice and agree with the Statement of Faith.
  • Please send me my free copy of Britain in Sin, which lifts the lid on the unrighteous legislation of the past fifity years and its devastating social consequences, my free copy of Understanding Islam, which will tell me all I need to know about Islam, my free copy of Labelling Halal, which exposes the secret sale of Islamic meat, and the latest Christian Voice newsletter, full of confidential prayer targets, which never goes up on the web.
  • I/we agree to computer storage of all information provided, solely for the use of Christian Voice.

Aims of Christian Voice

  • To uphold Christianity as the Faith of the United Kingdom.
  • To be a voice for Biblical values in law and public policy.
  • To defend and support traditional family life.
  • At all times to rely humbly on the blessing of Almighty God.

Statement of Faith

  1. We believe in one creator God, eternally existent in three persons, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as stated in the historic creeds of the Christian church.
  2. We acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord over all creation.
  3. We believe the Holy Bible to be the inspired, infallible, written Word of God to whose precepts, given for the good of nations and individuals, all man’s laws must submit.
  4. We believe all government to be under the authority of God and that its purpose is the maintenance of freedom and justice solely in accordance with Biblical principles.

Cost of annual membership is £20.00

If you agree with the Aims & Statement of Faith then click the button below.

If you wish to renew your membership please click the button below. We will match your details to our records.

Commonwealth ignores gay rights

Gay rights activists were left disappointed this weekend as the Commonwealth ignored their demands to legalise homosexual acts.

The Commonwealth: Calls for gay rights fell flat

Calls from Australia and Canada at the 2011 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Perth, Western Australia, echoing William Hague’s earlier speech to the Commonwealth People’s Forum, were opposed by African, Asian and Caribbean nations.   Only Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom have enacted full gay rights.  India’s High Court legalised sodomy and gross indecency in 2009, and South Africa has legalised homosexual activity in line with their pro-gay constitution, but both have stopped way short of the kind of measures which have seen Christians targeted by homosexual activists in the United Kingdom.

This positive outcome is a victory for righteousness and comes after Christian Voice organised a campaign of prayer throughout the Commonwealth.  Christian Voice also exposed Michael Kirby, the Australian delegate who put down the motion to legalise unnatural acts, as an obsessive homosexual.

We give God the glory that David Cameron was left blustering on BBC’s Andrew Marr Show that he would use foreign aid to enforce his view, but admitting that any country’s position on gay rights was just ‘one of the things that will determine our aid policy’ and recognising that ‘they are in a different place to us on this issue’, suggested by Andrew Marr as ‘some sort of bizarre Western fetish’.  You can watch the interview until 5th November 2011.

The reality is that Britain must get rid of its overseas aid budget somewhere.  If it refuses to give aid to those African and Caribbean nations which view sodomy with disgust, it is a bit stuck.  However, in the past it has used aid ‘creatively’ to support projects aimed at softening up populations to accept immorality and feminism.

The Department for International Development is targeting its aid to fewer countries.  Its website says: ‘Our resources and impact will be concentrated on 27 countries which account for three quarters of global maternal mortality and nearly three quarters of global malaria deaths: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Burma, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Occupied Palestinian Territories, Pakistan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Tajikistan,Tanzania, Uganda,Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe.’

If International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell takes out all the countries which criminalise sodomy, he will be left with Burma, the Congo, India, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, South Africa and Tajikistan.  But even then, public displays of homosexuality are a cultural taboo in pretty well all of them.  Those committing homosexual acts in Congo, for example, are prosecuted under public decency laws.  So are the children of current British aid recipients going to be denied secure schooling, vaccination,  safe drinking water and improved sanitation?  Does Cameron want women to die in pregnancy and childbirth and newborn babies to die needlessly without British aid?

Actually, African voices are beginning to voice the idea that foreign aid does more harm than good and if it is going to be attached to pro-gay strings the argument is made all the stronger.  A good argument is made that foreign aid is there to make our politicians look caring for their own political advantage.

By a picture of a smirking Mitchell, the DfID website also says it wants to ‘help 10 million more women get access to modern family planning’.  Mitchell is one of the House of Commons’ most pro-gay and pro-abortion MPs.  As ‘modern family planning ‘ means abortion, and as the British Government is going to use foreign aid to campaign for that as well as for gay rights, these aid recipients are better off without it.

Love and tolerance = hate and violence

Police protecting Christians from homosexuals during a 'gay pride' march in Brighton in southern England.

Legalising homosexual acts leads to a tyranny against those who disagree with gay rights, as shown in this shocking video showing violence from homosexuals against Christians on 13th Agust 2011 in Brisbane, Australia.

Australians in Brisbane should have the fear of God after the floods which devastated it earlier this year, but here are gays flaunting their sin as Sodom and assaulting Christians preaching the Gospel.  Ironically, the homosexual rally against which the Christians were witnessing called for tolerance and was promoted by ‘Equal Love’.

In the United Kingdom, we have had similar homosexual violence against Christians and we are now seeing persecution of Christians at work and in business in the name of ‘equality’ and ‘diversity’.

The latest case in Britain involves housing manager Adrian Smith, demoted for not backing gay marriage.  Smith, a practising Christian, has had his pay slashed because he said on his private Facebook page that that allowing gay weddings in churches was ‘an equality too far’.

Sodomy and gross indecency between men were only decriminalised in the United Kingdom in 2003, but already our public sector is awash with cases where Christians have been sacked for things like refusing to conduct ‘gay civil partnerships’, being unable to help gays with their sex lives or for not placing children to be adopted by homosexuals.

British Catholic adoption agencies have been closed down by our ‘sexual orientation regulations’ and Christian public sector workers are now afraid to express any view against homosexuality.  The aggressive ‘gay lobby’ rules in Parliament, the Courts and Town Halls up and down the land, imposing its immorality on the rest of society.

Two homosexual men even used Government money to sue Christian hoteliers who refused to give them a double bed – and won.

 We post this ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting this weekend (28th to 30th October 2011), and pray that African, caribbean and Asian Commonwealth nations will stand against the motion being moved by Australian homosexual activist Michael Kirby

We call for compassion for all those caught in sexual sin.  The Church should be ministering the saving and healing grace of Jesus Christ to these unfortunate individuls.  Equally, human rights include no right to commit acts against nature.  The experience of the United Kingdom and Australia, to say nothing of the USA, shows what inevitably happens to those nations which legalise unnatural acts. 

 

Commonwealth homosexual activist exposed

Obsessive: Michael Kirby admiring a picture of himself

The Australian delegate who is trying to pressurise African and Caribbean nations to decriminalise sodomy at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting is an obsessive homosexual, Christian Voice has discovered.

Michael Kirby, part of the Australian delegation and a retired Australian High Court judge, has been promoting homosexuality since he named one Johan van Vloten, a non-believer, as his ‘long-term partner’ in 1999. Despite claiming to be an Anglican, he has publicly attacked his own Archbishop of Sydney, called fellow Christians ‘God-botherers’ in a video on the TEDxSydney Youtube Channel, and denounced believers at the so-called ‘Parliament of the World’s Religions‘ in December 2009.

He is an advocate of sex education based on promiscuity with condoms, thinks prostitutes are merely ‘sex workers’ and would force the legalisation of both prostitution and homosexuality world-wide.

He has called for the State to apologise to homosexuals and for the Church to apologise for its ‘non-acceptance’ of homosexuality (but not, oddly enough, for its ‘non-acceptance’ of adultery, thieving and perjury).  For Kirby, mere tolerance for sodomy and its practitioners is not enough.  He demands acceptance, claiming, against the growing evidence of those released from homosexuality, that the science is ‘settled’ and that homosexuality is ‘genetic’, a position he must know that no geneticist actually accepts.

As a practising homosexual, Kirby has made no end of speeches promoting the homosexual cause.  Some are listed on the SaltShakers webiste HERE.  He promotes homosexuality fanatically, in the UN and other world bodies like UNAIDS.

In any other walk of life, someone who could not stop banging on about some aspect of his life would be regarded as a crushing bore.  But Kirby has been garlanded with awards and honorary degrees around the world.

Now just because you are paranoid it does not mean they are not out to get you.  But for Kirby, anyone who disagrees with him in any way – is motivated by ‘hate’.  The reality is, he has no moral high ground from which to make such a charge.

In 2006 Michael Kirby described fellow celebrity lawyer John Marsden, a drug-user and self-described promiscuous homosexual, glowingly as ‘a pioneer for openly gay people in the law’.  He went on to hail him as a ‘an example of courage … to homosexual people and other minorities in Australia’.

Alfred Kinsey - exposed as a pervert, eulogised by Kirby

Michael Kirby is astonishingly on the board of the Kinsey Institute and constantly eulogises Alfred Kinsey, a pervert who included prison inmates and paedophiles in his research, as well as sexual experiments done on children, to ‘prove’ his contention that 10% of the population were homosexual (the true figure, even in the decadent West, is around 1%) and that children could – and should – experience sexual pleasure.

Nor does the fact that Kirby has a long-term partner mean that they have necessarliy been sexually faithful to each other.  We just don’t know.  But in the majority of homosexual couples, one or the other or both have sexual contacts outside their relationship.  Fidelity is not a concept which has any relevance in homosexual life.

The founder of Liberty Chrisitian Ministries, Christopher Keane, in his testimony ‘Choices’, has said that:

in the many years that he lived the gay lifestyle, truly monogamous gay relationships are all but impossible, and that those relationships which he encountered that had a semblance of monogamy were very often a facade.  Many in those relationships were sleeping around behind their partners’ backs; or there was an arrangement where both partners agreed to stay together while ‘permitting’ the other partner to have sex on the side. 

Kirby says it is ‘ridulous and wicked’ to deny homosexuals the right to marry.  On the contrary, it is ‘ridulous and wicked’ to allow it.  Wicked because it flies in the face of the ordinance of Almighty God, endorsed by the Lord Jesus, that marriage is between one man and one woman.  Ridiculous because a marriage must be consumated in law to be valid.  How can a pair of homosexuals, lacking between them the complementary parts of the anatomy necessary for such an act of sexual intercourse, possibly do that?

Kirby pretends that African attitudes to homosexuality were introduced by colonialists.  The truth is that homosexuality and other sexual immorality has been contrary to African attitudes for generations.  The irony is, Kirby’s motion at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in October 2011 is a shameless attempt at neo-colonialism, where rich white nations use threats of withdrawal of foreign aid to browbeat those less wealthy than themselves.

Motions at the Commonwealth meetings are only passed if they are agreed by consensus.  If the African, Caribbean and Asian Commonwealth nations stand together for truth and morality, Kirby’s self-serving motion will deservedly fail.

 

JOIN Christian Voice:

Christian School Hit by Homosexual ‘Hate Crime’

0

Scott Lively is author of The Pink Swastika

American homosexual activists have taken their agenda to a new level of ‘domestic terrorism’ with acts of vandalism against Christian Liberty Academy in Arlington Heights, Illinois.

The violence, which resulted in damaged doors and windows having to be boarded up, occurred on the morning of 15 October, the day the school had scheduled a talk from Dr Scott Lively, author of The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality and the Nazi Party.

Dr Lively’s speech, sponsored by the Naperville-based organization, Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality, proceeded as planned.

One of the pieces of concrete thrown through the window had a note attached to it that read: “This is just a sample of what we will do if you don’t shut down Scott Lively and AFTAH … Quit the homophobic (expletive)!”

Other bricks had the words ‘Shut down Lively’ written on them in addition to obscene phrases.
Hours after the attack an email was sent to AFTAH President Peter LaBarbera by someone claiming responsibility for the crime and threatening more violence against the school. It read:

‘In the early morning hours of October 15th, we put two chunks of concrete through the glass windows and doors of the Christian Liberty Academy…. We did this because at 6 p.m. today they will be hosting an event organized by the homophobic hate group Americans For Truth About Homosexuality, that [sic] will be presenting an award to Scott Lively.”

‘These chunks of concrete were thrown through these windows and doors for two reasons: to show that there is a consequence for hatred and homophobia in our community and to directly cause this event to be shut down. If this event is not shut down, and the homophobic day trainings do not end, the Christian Liberty Academy will continue to be under constant attack.”

Peter LaBarbera, head of AFTAH, commented that if the vandalism had been against a pro-gay group there would have been a hate crime probe.

“We see the homosexual agenda is becoming so arrogant in its growing power,” LaBarbera commented, “but we’ve never seen this before, what we would call ‘homofascism’ being raised to the level of domestic terrorism.”

“A lot of Christians cower in fear before the power and influence of the homosexual lobby. It’s not helpful. If you demonstrate you can be intimidated, you reward the bully. The ‘gay’ bully has been rewarded enough times, so many times they think they can get their way. We hope more churches will refuse to be bullied and will stand up to tell the truth about the homosexual agenda.”

His words were echoed by Dr Lively who said, “I don’t want to be overly dramatic, but I believe this incident may represent a turning point in the culture war. The claim of responsibility and threat of future violence by the ‘gay’ militants, ala Islamist terrorists, is unprecedented.”

Dr Lively, the author of five books and president of the California-based Abiding Truth Ministries, has long been an object of hatred among militant homosexualualists.

PRAY: Thank the Lord for the courage demonstrated by Dr Lively and the AFTAH. Calvin Lindstrom, pastor of Christian Liberty, was asked how the church was responding to the attack, and he answered, “In prayer. The Lord is our ultimate defender, and we trust the Lord will give us safety and will bring whoever did this to justice.” Their example is worthy for us to follow. May we also turn immediately to God in prayer when faced with troubles.

 

Commonwealth must resist pro-sodomy call

Do African nations really need gay pride marches? This sad and depraved scene took place in London.

CANBERRA, Australia — An official says leaders of former British Empire countries will be asked next weekend to legalize homosexuality.

Australian delegate Michael Kirby told Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio yesterday that the agenda includes a recommendation to legalize homosexuality.  Kirby claims countries have a difficult time educating populations about safe sex while also banning ‘gay sex’.

Leaders of 53 Commonwealth countries will meet in the Australian city of Perth over the weekend of 28th to 30th October 2011 for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting.  As motions are determined by consensus, the Australian initiative will most likely get nowhere, but it is part of the pressure being exerted by the white donor nations on those they regard as less ‘enlightened’.

Australian activist Rob Lake says most Commonwealth countries outlaw homosexuality and the response to the recommendation would ‘test their human rights commitment’.

London Gay Pride March

The truth about HIV/AIDS

Firstly, Kirby’s claim is both self-serving and contradictory.  For years sodomy advocates have told the rest of us that HIV/AIDS is not a ‘gay disease’ and did not predominantly affect the homosexual network.  Now Kirby admits that it does.  So what is the truth?

In fact, HIV/AIDS is a bloodbourne disease which needs to get into the bloodstream direct or through an open wound.

So, firstly, the rectum is easily torn during sodomy, and the rectal wall is only one cell thick.  It is perfectly designed to extract water from bodily waste, so viruses of all sorts can be absorbed straight into the blood-stream during the unnatural act of sodomy.

Secondly, if sexually-transmitted diseases go untreated, they can leave lesions through which HIV can travel during normal sexual intercourse. Thirdly, reuse of hypodermic needles following inadequate sterilisation can transmit HIV in some countries’ medical establishments.  Chastity before marriage, faithfulness in marriage and good medical practice, which may need better funding, are much more effective than condoms in stopping HIV/AIDS.

Legalising homosexual acts will increase gay tourism

Legalising sodomy would only make matters worse, and will also lead to more of the horrors of gay tourism which already corrupt children in parts of Africa, the Caribbean and Asia.  Despite what Mr Lake and other ‘health’ and ‘human rights’ activists say, there is no human right to commit unnatural sexual acts in any human rights document.  Homosexual attraction is not inbuilt.  Both men and women have been released from it.

Lesbian aggression at Sidney Mardi Gras; one of the less indecent photos on the Mardi Gras website.

Let us look at the countries leading the pro-sodomy charge.  In Australia, the Sydney ‘Mardi Gras‘ has, according to its website, been taken up with enthusiasm by the city.  It, like every Mardi Gras and Gay Pride everywhere in the world, is an annual display of Western depravity and obscenity.

Activists promoting pro-gay teaching in schools

The UK hosts numerous homosexual events and promotes sodomy to school-children as young as five.  Every political party is now in favour of gay rights, none more so than the one headed by David Cameron, our ‘Conservative’ Prime Minister, who is so obsessed by homosexuality he wants homosexuals to be allowed to get ‘married‘ and has threatened African nations that he will withdraw foreign aid unless they legalise the Western vice of sodomy.

Cameron’s proposals have led to a Petition to Defend Marriage, and a Christian Voice campaign to Save Africa from Sodomy, which includes a seperate Petition on the subject linked to a hard-hitting video.

Call to resist Western depravity

Stephen Green, National Director of Christian Voice, said today:

‘Those Commonwealth nations who still respect morality and the sovereignty of Almighty God have to stand together against the cultural imperialism of rich white countries.   Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand still have a colonialist mindset in which the white man knows best.  Well perhaps Britain and the rest, where immorality in public policy is leading to a breakdown of society and even to violence on the streets, need to take some lessons in decency and respect from African, Caribbean and Asian nations.

‘I live in a country which has been rushing along a godless road to destruction for the past fifty years.  Britain legalised sodomy, abortion, divorce-on-demand and pornography in the 1960s.  Today Britain is described as brutal and broken even by leading politicians like David Cameron himself.

‘The nation which took the Gospel around the world is now intent on exporting our peculiar brand of wickedness.

‘Our experience in Britain shows that legalising sodomy leads to full gay rights, recognised homosexual partnerships and then ‘gay weddings’, hate crimes laws designed to prevent pastors speaking the truth about human sexuality, and an aggressive homosexual lobby which allows no dissent in political parties or in the corridors of power.

‘In Britain, it has led to hoteliers being forced to let rooms to pairs of homosexuals and forced those who oppose sodomy out of public-sector jobs.  Ours is a society going to a libertarian hell on earth where the rights of people to practice their Christian faith are openly trampled on.

‘And if activists want to talk about human rights, let them explain away the fact that in England and Wales, 189,574 children were killed by abortion in 2010 alone.  Every single day of the year, on average, over 500 unborn children are being torn out of what should be the safest place on God’s earth in the United Kingdom.  Where is their human right to life?  For some amazing pictures of life – and death – before birth, click HERE

‘Truly, David Cameron has no moral high ground at all from which to lecture non-white Commonwealth nations about ‘human rights’.

‘I hope and pray that those nations will stand together to tell Australia and Britain a few home truths about basic morality.’

 

JOIN Christian Voice Today:

Christian Voice Takes Stand For Male Primogeniture

6

News that David Cameron is supporting changes to the laws regulating the crown’s succession was met with a firestorm of protest by lobby group, Christian Voice.

The activist organization claimed that the current laws, which give preference to firstborn males, are rooted in the Bible and cannot be changed without seriously compromising the integrity of the monarchy.

In a public announcement on 18 October, Christian Voice pledged to take all possible action to block the proposed changes, which seek to amend the 1701 Act of Settlement.

The group also said that they were putting together a Parliamentary Briefing Paper outlining the legal and scriptural reasons for maintaining the current rules.

The present laws of succession, rooted in traditions going back at least to the time of the Norman invasion, were condemned by David Cameron last week as ‘an anomaly’ that allegedly helps to ‘enshrine male superiority.’

Although the previous Labour government supported a change to the rules, it was not until the lead-up to the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton that the issue was again thrust into the national limelight. Policy makers began to point out that if the royal couple’s first-born child happens to be female, it would be unfair to deprive her of the throne. Leicester East MP Keith Vaz even went so far as to argue that the present rules constitute a case of ‘sex discrimination.’

Robin Phillips, press secretary for Christian Voice, commented today, “Fairness isn’t the pertinent issue here. An hereditary monarchy is already about as unfair as you can get. If we were to alter the succession rules in order to not ‘discriminate’ against firstborn females, then it would be hard to answer those who are using similar arguments to suggest that the monarchy should be completely abandoned. A representative of the anti-monarchy group Republic recently wrote me saying, ‘once we concede the principle that the throne should be open to women, the debate will raise a lot more questions: why not a second born daughter? Why not someone else’s daughter? So, we are looking forward to this debate to enable us to highlight the unfairness of the hereditary principle in and of itself.’ If we begin pandering to the idol of equality and political correctness, we may find that we have inadvertently unlocked a Pandora’s box that can only culminate in ceding ground to those republicans who wish to dissolve the monarchy completely.”

Phillips pointed out that “Critics of male-preference primogeniture often speak about it as a simple matter of getting the Commonwealth countries to agree to amend the Act of Settlement. What they normally fail to take into account is that the Act of Settlement was only legal in the first place because it was rooted in centuries of English common law. Tampering with the common law in order to meet the demands of political correctness is something that William Blackstone warned against back in the 1760s when he wrote his Commentaries on the Laws of England.

When asked about the Queen having ‘let it be known’ that she supports such a change, Mr Phillips replied, “Her Majesty the Queen is certainly free to support the present proposals if she so desires. However, we must not forget that her fundamental obligation remains to be ‘ever mindful of the Law and the Gospel of God as the Rule for the whole life and government of Christian Princes.’ Her primary responsibility as our sovereign is to conform the monarchy to the standards of God’s laws. We will be arguing in our briefing paper that scripture supports male preference primogeniture and we trust that Her Majesty the Queen will take our arguments seriously.”

The Prime Minister will raise the issue for discussion at the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting later this month. If his proposals are eventually implemented, then a first-born daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge could become Queen.

Further Reading

Gender Equality Takes Centre Stage
 

Evangelism opportunity at Anglesey Mardi Gras

Beaumaris on a typical Welsh morning!

PLANS to stage next year’s North Wales Mardi Gras in an Anglesey town have been rightly attacked by the leader of a local church, according to the Holyhead and Anglesey Mail.

Reverend Philip Evans, of Oasis Ministries in Beaumaris, said the event should not be held in the town as it was “a promotion of gay rights”.

The organiser of the Mardi Gras, Alan Jones, responded: “The church has a right to object to the Mardi Gras and we respect their right to peaceful protest, but we will carry on regardless.  We won’t be put off and we won’t be upset by the criticism.  We will welcome them if they want to attend and will treat them civilly.”

 

Gay parades are aggressive and intimidating

That would be a first.

“The event does not promote homosexuality,” claimed Mr Jones, “It’s an event for everyone which brings the gay community and the straight community together.”

That would be another first.  Every Gay Pride and homosexual Mardi Gras is there to promote homosexuality and gay rights and to intimidate and de-sensitize ordinary people.  The pictures on this page are of other ‘Pride’ or ‘Mardi Gras’ events in England and Wales.

The event, said the paper, is planned to take place from 27th to 29th April, 2012.  For more information, they advised to visit www.northwalesmardigras.com which carries thanks to various ‘drag queens’ with indecent names and to two Anglesey hotels, Tre-Ysgawen Hall at Capel Coch, Llangefni, and the Victoria Hotel at Menai Bridge.  If the webpage is correct, these are venues to be avoided by decent people.

Parading their sin - You would need a heart of stone not to weep for the poor souls caught up in sodomy.

Mr Evans is intending to lead an evangelistic witness at the Beaumaris Mardi Gras, if it goes ahead: “We think the best thing is for it not to take place, but we want to be there if it does,” he said. “Homosexuality is a choice people make and people can change.  God would help them to be as He intended them to be.”

Christian Voice fully intends to stand with Mr Evans in a concerted evangelistic outreach and witness.  Last April 2011, tucked away in the Mona Showground, the participants were isolated from any criticism or evangelism.  Next year, the narrow streets of Beaumaris are perfect for preaching and one-to-one conversations, so we can share the good news of Jesus Christ, and let these sad and damaged people know that Jesus releases not just from the stain of sin but from the power of sin.  Make a note of the date, all you evangelists out there!

 

Defend Marriage Petition

 A petition to defend marriage is now up-and-running.

The text is simple:

‘We the undersigned believe that marriage was ordained by God to be the union of one man and one woman and that marriage between two persons of the same sex can not and should not be legalised by any earthly government.’

The UK Government has signalled its intention to legalise gay marriage so this matter is urgent and signing the petition is one vital way of standing up for Christ.

PLEASE NOTE: You can remain anonymous and you don’t have to give ANY personal information (like your phone numbers and address) to sign this petition.  However, if you provide it in the boxes provided we can keep in touch with you better. We will never under any circumstance give your personal details to any third party at all, ever!

And for that very reason we do not advocate or support signing petitions on the No10 or other Gvt websites …

P.S. Any invitation for a donation following your signature of the petition is from ipetitions and not from Christian Voice. You are free either to donate to the site or not as you wish.

Carry on Preaching, say police

 After an initial flurry in which two intellectually-challenged policemen from the Lancashire Constabulary told the owner of a Christian cafe in Blackpool that displaying this Bible texts was a breach of public order laws, the police have now apologised.

Jamie Murray, the owner of the Salt and Light coffeehouse, uses a set of DVDs that display the words of the New Testament on a screen on the cafe’s back wall.

Apparently, two officers from Lancashire Constabulary told Mr Murray that a member of the public had complained about ‘homophobic material’ and sid he was in breach of section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986.

The police, as the Christian Institute pointed out, ‘got the law wrong’. The cafe can carry on displaying the word of God. There is no need, as some are arguing, for a change in the law to remove the word ‘insulting’ from the Public Order Act.  Atheists are certainly in favour of such a change because of the embarrassment they feel in the face of each new episode of anti-Christian police persecution.

But as Ann Widdecombe has pointed out, in every case the police have had to back down and pay compensation to those falsely arrested or charged.

With all the pressures from secularists are and the government to legalise gay marriage, the demands of our time in the fields of abortion and sex education, but a continued threat of civil action against Christian hoteliers, surely we have more important things to concern us.

The police are slow learners, but there will come a time when the lowliest officer on the beat actually knows the law and the judgement of thank you Lord Justice Sedley in the case of Alison Redmond-Bate (1999).

The message is clear: ‘Carry on Preaching’!