The flag of Belize

A Constitutional challenge has been mounted in Belize to the laws which currently make unnatural acts a criminal offence.  A preliminary hearing is scheduled for early in December (2011).  We are calling for a mobilization of the church in prayer across the world for our brethren in Belize.  If Belize is rolled over by the homosexual juggernaut, the rest of the Caribbean could easily follow.

 The Constitution of Belize (formerly British Honduras) was settled in 1981.  It acknowledges the supremacy of God, stresses human rights, freedom and the family.  No-one has claimed before now that men suddenly have an inalienable right to commit acts of sodomy and gross indecency under it, especially as it says: ‘freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and upon the rule of law’.

 The law suit has been filed by an organisation called UNIBAM.  UNIBAM is short for United Belize Advocacy Movement, which hides behind concern about HIV/AIDS but is nothing more than a shameless homosexual rights group.  UNIBAM’s court case is fronted by the former UK Labour Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith QC, and has drawn condemnation from churches in Belize.

 There has been outrage in Belize at the grant of a substantial sum of money to UNIBAM by the Embassy of the United States of America.

 The US Embassy website admits that its grant to UNIBAM is for pro-gay propaganda.  In their own words, the project: ‘will increase public awareness about homophobia while creating a safe space for HIV prevention work. The organization will organize a national debate on homophobia and human rights. Other initiatives will include the distribution of wrist bands to raise awareness of the issue, prevention education sessions among LGBT population, and the airing of public service announcements.’  View HERE.

 Both UNIBAM and another pro-gay group, the Alliance Against Aids (AAA) are totally funded from abroad.  The people of Belize themselves are overwhelmingly opposed to homosexuality.  In the case of AAA, their money comes mainly from HIVOS, the wealthy Dutch Humanist body.  Caleb Orozco, the founder and head of UNICAM, claims to have “‘friends in high places’ politically and in the media.” Homosexual View HERE.

 UNIBAM has also received money from the United Nations Population Fund UNFPA (see page 7 of this link):

 The churches in Belize are mobilizing, having filed an application to join the action.  They have held a seminar, and Belize Action has been set up to oppose UNIBAM.

 Dean Barrow, the Prime Minister of Belize, has come out against the move, according to a report from the ‘gay travelers network’, who are very interested in having a new exotic location in which to corrupt local youth for a dollar or two.  The same website reveals that, astonishingly, the Commonwealth Lawyers Association is backing UNICAM:

 Here is the CLA ‘About us’ page: http://www.commonwealthlawyers.com/AboutUs.asp#Secretariat

 Even this pro-gay BMJ article reveals that homosexual practices are dangerous and unsanitary.  For a more detailed look, supported by research done by homosexual doctors, this scholarly article shows the implications for health and morals in Belize from decriminalising these acts of perversion. 

 Meanwhile, right across the Caribbean Sea in Barbados, Wikipedia is wittering on about ‘LGBT rights’ or the lack thereof,  the Attorney General is laying down the law, but Ambassador to the USA John Beale is sounding a bit wet, while some dreadful fat lesbian wants Barbados to cash in on gay sex tourism.  

 African nations have reacted with fury and defiance to pressure from David Cameron and other leaders of decadent Western nations to decriminalise sodomy. Nigeria is poised to outlaw gay marriage, according to The Guardian (UK).  A more balanced and informative article was in the Nigeria Sun newspaper.  The British High Commissioner in Lagos, Andrew Lloyd, is furious.  ‘Britain and other western countries would not tolerate any law that prescribes punishment for gays’, said Mr Lloyd.

 Despite what the Guardian says about other African countries scrapping anti-gay laws, it’s all the other way.  Zambia and Zimbabwe have said they will not enact gay rights, according to a UK homosexual paper.  (Although we cannot imagine what possessed Morgan Tsvangirai to say he now believes ‘gay rights are human rights’.)

 Ghana’s President John Atta Mills said he will never enact laws which will ‘destroy the moral fibre of society’, while John Nagenda of the Ugandan Presidential Office said “Uganda is, if you remember, a sovereign state and we are tired of being given these lectures … “If they must take their money, so be it,” he concluded.

Malawi’s governmental spokesperson Patricia Kaliati said that it was “unfortunate” that Britain was considering “pro-gay strings” to aid, adding that homosexual acts are illegal in Malawi.  She noted that such laws are a legacy of British rule, reported Nyasa Times, but the laws were and are entirely consistent with African moral values, even though Britian is now sinking into a swamp of immorality and perversion, where homosexuals are now persecuting Christians.

Tanzania’s foreign affairs minister Bernard Membe said: “Tanzania will never accept Cameron’s proposal because we have our own moral values. Homosexuality is not part of our culture and we will never legalize it.  Tanzania is ready to end diplomatic ties with Britain if it imposes conditions on the assistance it provides to pressurize for adoption of laws that recognize homosexuality.  We are guided by our tradition. We have families of a mother, a father and children. What Cameron is doing might lead to the collapse of the Commonwealth.”

The President of Zanzibar, Ali Mohamed Shein, said that Islamic and Zanzibari culture abhors gay and lesbian activities. “We cannot compromise our deeply rooted culture or [allow] something which [is] completely against our religion. Let them cut off aid,” he said.

 The fact is, the UK has to get rid of its aid budget, which is not so much about helping poorer nations as making our politicians look good.  If mothers die in childbirth in an African nation because the UK denied that country aid on a gay whim, it will not look good on David Cameron’s CV.  So their ‘lectures’, as Uganda described them, are mere posturing.

 But back to the subject.  The threat to Belize is real.  Please pray for the Church in Belize to be granted wisdom, resources and favour with the judges, pray for confusion in the homosexual camp, and please sign our Save Africa from Sodomy Petition (if you have not already done so).

 

 

23 COMMENTS

    • That’s really funny Jane, because Satan tempted the Lord Jesus to do just that, didn’t he, and received a dusty reply (Matt 4 & Luke 4)! Sodomy is an unnatural act and an act of abuse whether inflicted on a man or on a woman, IMHO. The Bible I notice keeps the marital bedroom door shut and so should we.

      • Travelling by mechanical means, hiding our bodies by wearing clothes, eating with a knife and fork, and using a computer keyboard are all also unnatural acts. There are thousands of things we humans do that could be considered ‘unnatural’, in that no other animal on Earth does them. Are you going to campaign against these, Stephen?

          • Not really, Stephen. Either you go by the Bible as a rulebook for your life or you don’t. You can’t just pick and choose the bits that support your own prejudices.

            Well, actually you *can*. It just makes you look like a fool.

          • No surprise, but I agree with Jane. Either the bible is the perfect word of a perfect god, and must be followed to the letter. If it is so, then you, as a mere fallible mortal, do not have your god’s permission to choose which bits can be ignored. If it isn’t, then it’s just another book.

            Which is to be, Stephen? Remember, the fate of your mortal soul may depend upon your answer.

  1. You’re complaining about people committing what you regard as unnatural acts, while all the time you are also committing unnatural acts. Why is it silly to question the ones that you obsessively choose to focus on?

    IMHO, people who believe that a magic sky ghost created a universe in six days, magically impregnated a virgin, and who then allowed himself to become a mortal and die despite knowing he was immortal, came back then died again even though he’s still immortal but will be mortal again one day*, are people who define the word ‘silly’.

    *That’s only for starters.

    • You haven’t established that wearing clothes, making a donkey cart or an engine, using tools etc etc are unnatural. Since God created man with the ability to invent these items, and since his holy word does not forbid them, they are perfectly natural. However, forcing the male organ into a part of the body perfectly designed by our gracious maker for the extraction of water from bodily waste, consisting of one single of columnar epithelium, (compared with the 12 or 20 layers of squamous epithelium in the vagina, which also generates an appropriate level of lubrcation, and is perfectly designed for its purpose) is unnatural on top of being condemned in Scripture. There is no ‘picking and chosing’ here. The Bible is our rulebook and it is backed up by common sense and medical knowledge. What’s your rulebook?

  2. Anything artificial is, by it’s very nature, unnatural because it does not occur in nature.

    Whatever my rulebook is, I’m not going to follow one that instructs me to eat bread made with human dung (Ezekiel 4:12), boil my son and eat him (II Kings 6:28-29), kill children by dashing them against stones (Psalm 137:9) or hate my family in order to become a disciple (Luke 14:26).

    How will you be judged by your god, Stephen, if you haven’t followed instructions like these as detailed in your lovely book?

    • Dave, you must read the BIble in context and read it using the common sense the good Lord has given you. Ezekiel was told to make a prophetic point, the folk in the siege were not instructed by God to eat children they just did it, Psalm 137 expresses the judgment coming on Babylon, and Jewish thought and expression is very black-and-white (I love this side of the synagogue, I hate that side). You tend to let your hatred of God run away with you.

  3. I have no hatred for things that don’t exist. For example, I don’t hate pixies, elves or fairies. Neither have I any love or admiration for unicorns or Hobbits. What I hate is people who use absurd beliefs to excuse hatred and bigotry.

      • I would also hate those beliefs, if they lead to people killing each other over them. I am struggling to think of examples where people have died as a result of a dispute over how to worship The Fairie King. Or have been condemned by bigots because their lifestyle contradicts what Gandalf said during ‘The Lord of the Rings’.

        • Are you struggling to think of examples of people who use the absurd beliefs of atheism to excuse hatred and bigotry, Dave? Try the French Revolution, which was explicitly atheist and because of that lost all respect for human life. Or Nazi Germany and its evolution-based concept of white supremacy. Or Stalin’s atheist Soviet Union. Or the Cambodian killing fields. Or the Chinese or North Korean persecution of Christians.
          And as you said you hate people who have beliefs at odds with yours, you could easily put that hatred into action and get rid of them if you came to power. What would stop you?