{"id":7722,"date":"2014-06-24T05:32:38","date_gmt":"2014-06-24T04:32:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/?p=7722"},"modified":"2014-06-24T06:47:01","modified_gmt":"2014-06-24T05:47:01","slug":"baroness-hale-backtracks-on-bull-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/baroness-hale-backtracks-on-bull-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Baroness Hale Backtracks on Bull v. Hall Ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Baroness<\/a>
Baroness Hale, pictured, has called into question whether or not the law makes accommodation for Christians beliefs.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In an unexpected turn of events, Supreme Court Deputy Baroness Hale has said that she \u201cmay have been wrong<\/strong><\/a>\u201d in her earlier ruling against Christian bed and breakfast owners who refused a double bed to a homosexual couple.<\/p>\n

The UK\u2019s senior female judge called<\/strong><\/a> for a re-think concerning her decision to condemn Peter and Hazelmary Bull of discrimination against homosexuals. In addition, she said<\/strong><\/a> that the law has done little to protect Christian beliefs.<\/p>\n

Baroness Hale’s remarks,which have come more than six months after the Bulls\u2019 final appeal was refused, call into question the relationship between gay rights and religious rights<\/p>\n

In 2008, the Bulls refused to rent a double bed to a homosexual couple in their Marazion Bed and Breakfast called Chymorvah House. The same-sex couple, Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall, took the Bulls to court, where Lady Hale and four other judges eventually ruled that the rights of the gay couple trumped the religious freedom of the Bulls.<\/p>\n

Lady Hale declared that the Bulls will not have to pay<\/strong><\/a> Preddy and Hall\u2019s legal costs for the case, which was in the original sentence. In addition, she said<\/strong><\/a> that laws which ignore the consciences of Christians will not be and may need to be adjusted to include a \u201cconscience clause\u201d for Christian business owners like the Bulls.<\/p>\n

Speaking to Irish lawyers, Hale used the Bull case as one example among many recent cases that may have been unfair to Christian beliefs. In this speech she asked: \u201cShould we be developing an explicit requirement upon providers of employment, goods and services to make reasonable accommodation for the manifestation of religious beliefs?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is fascinating that a country with an established church can be less respectful of religious feelings than one without\u201d, Hale was quoted in the Telegraph<\/strong><\/a> as saying. \u201cIt is not difficult to see why the Christians feel that their religious beliefs are not being sufficiently respected.\u201d<\/p>\n

Mrs. Bull was glad to be relieved of the case costs, and hoped that her case would pave the way for other Christians in similar situations.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is too late for us, which is a shame, but at the same time I hope her comments will restore some kind of balance back to the issue,\u201d Bull said. \u201cI am glad that something positive looks as though it will come out of this although I would not call it a victory.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Bulls nearly closed their B&B because business had declined, and they could no longer keep up their advertising. However, thanks to financial support from different supporters they were able to stay in business.<\/p>\n

Mrs. Bull added that she had no hard feelings toward anyone, but thinks that the Supreme Court \u201cmissed a big opportunity to put something right.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are certainly not homophobic but hopefully the pendulum is being corrected. I have never been able to understand why two different lifestyles cannot live together harmoniously,\u201d Bull added.<\/p>\n

Mrs. Bull\u2019s comments touch on issues of concern in cases like these. Christians have been given the blanket reputation of \u201chomophobe,\u201d while gay people have refused to allow others to disagree with their lifestyle at the expense of their own convictions.<\/p>\n

Christians do not call non-Christians \u201cJesus-phobes\u201d or some other nonsensical term. Contrary to popular belief, it is indeed possible for Christians to have different views and to still treat other people as humans created in the image of God.<\/p>\n

While gay rights activists are very fond of calling Christians \u201chomophobes,\u201d in reality they are usually even more intolerant of Christians than Christians are intolerant of homosexuals.<\/p>\n

It is hoped that the courage shown by Peter and Hazelmary Bull, together with Lady Hale’s recent remarks, will pave the way for rulings in the favor of Christians to practice their beliefs.<\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In an unexpected turn of events, Supreme Court Deputy Baroness Hale has said that she \u201cmay have been wrong\u201d in her earlier ruling against Christian bed and breakfast owners who refused a double bed to a homosexual couple. The UK\u2019s senior female judge called for a re-think concerning her decision to condemn Peter and Hazelmary […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,11,83],"tags":[1287,337],"class_list":["post-7722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom-of-speech","category-homosexuality-trans","category-justice-policing-crime","tag-baroness-hale","tag-peter-and-hazelmary-bull"],"aioseo_notices":[],"rttpg_featured_image_url":null,"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"Robin","author_link":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/author\/robin\/"},"rttpg_comment":4,"rttpg_category":"Freedom of Speech<\/a> Homosexuality & Trans<\/a> Justice, Policing & Crime<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"In an unexpected turn of events, Supreme Court Deputy Baroness Hale has said that she \u201cmay have been wrong\u201d in her earlier ruling against Christian bed and breakfast owners who refused a double bed to a homosexual couple. The UK\u2019s senior female judge called for a re-think concerning her decision to condemn Peter and Hazelmary…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7722"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7722\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianvoice.org.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}