Why is Starmer out of touch with working Britain?

Christian councillor suspended for ‘Pride is a sin’ →

‘Ealing Council strikes at freedom of assembly →

Read and pray

READ: Gen 1:27; Amos 5:14–15, Eccles 10:2, Eccles 10:16–17, Isa 3:4–5, Isa 10:1–2, Jer 5:21, Hos 8:7, Matt 23:23–24, Luke 16:10, Rom 1:22, 1 Cor 1:27, Col 2:8, James 3:15–16.

PRAY:Pray against foolish leadership.

Pray for discernment in the Church.

Pray for restoration of righteous foundations.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Killer Migrant Wins Stay in UK Over ‘Blood Feud’

Islam & Immigration

2 April 2026

Migrant who murdered wife can stay in UK over ‘blood feud’ claim

A Turkish migrant who murdered his 23-year-old wife in 2005, has been allowed to remain in the UK while an immigration tribunal considers his claim that he would face a “blood feud” if deported to Turkey.

The 54-year-old known as KD, who served 14 years for stabbing his wife multiple times in a jealous rage, initially entered the UK illegally in 2001 and claimed asylum on the basis of his Kurdish ethnicity, Alevi faith, and political affiliation.

KD’s asylum claim was repeatedly rejected. After his release from prison, the Home Office sought to deport him, but he lodged a human rights appeal citing the alleged risk to his life from his wife’s family.

The Court of Appeal acknowledged the discomfort in allowing a convicted murderer to remain in the UK on human rights grounds, describing the situation as “uncomfortable” but emphasizing the legal principles requiring them to consider his claim.

Romans 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

Legal Loopholes and Human Rights Legislation

The case highlights tensions between public safety and human rights law. Despite KD’s violent crime, courts have been compelled to consider the risk to him from a vendetta in his home country.

Court of Appeal judges Peter Jackson, Arnold, and Dove admitted that it is troubling for “a foreign criminal subject to deportation [to] claim human rights protection because of an alleged blood feud resulting from his crime.” Yet, adherence to legal principle has allowed his appeal to continue.

Romans 13:4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good… a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Criminal Background and Risk Assessment

KD murdered his wife after remaining illegally in the UK for years following failed asylum appeals. A parole board concluded that while he has a low likelihood of general reoffending, he poses a “high or medium” risk of serious harm to intimate partners. Despite this, tribunals have upheld his claim to stay on human rights grounds, exposing a gap in the system between criminal accountability and deportation enforcement.

The case has sparked outrage among politicians and the public. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp condemned the decision as a “sickening” exploitation of human rights laws, arguing that foreign criminals are using legal loopholes to avoid deportation. The case has reignited debates about the UK’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the government’s ability to remove dangerous individuals from the country.

Meanwhile, KD initially entered the UK illegally, claimed asylum, and remained in the country despite multiple rejections. His continued presence, even after committing murder, underscores systemic weaknesses in immigration enforcement, parole monitoring, and the application of human rights law in cases involving serious criminality. Critics argue that the system prioritises legal technicalities over public safety, allowing convicted murderers to exploit loopholes to remain in the UK.

Exodus 12:49 One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you.

City bans Muslim festivals →

“Risk of Abuse”

A Namibian migrant outed as “bisexual” by his male cousin lover has been allowed to remain in Britain because he would face persecution if he were sent back to his home country.

The professional footballer faced verbal and physical abuse from his family when his relationship with his cousin emerged while he was dating a woman.

An immigration tribunal found that the man, who is now in a heterosexual relationship, was a “public figure” in Namibia and might be recognised on his return.

The Namibian, whose identity was kept anonymous, might therefore be at “risk of abuse”.

The case, revealed in court papers, comes as Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, draws up new legislation to limit the use of human rights claims by migrants and foreign criminals to avoid deportation.

Related Cases and Wider Implications

This case is part of a broader pattern of foreign criminals challenging deportation on human rights grounds, often citing risks of harm in their home countries.

Similar cases have involved individuals convicted of violent offences, sexual crimes, or terrorism-related acts using appeals to remain in the UK.

In February 2025, a Jamaican drug dealer avoided deportation after promising he’ll “only smoke” cannabis and not sell it. Shawn Rickford McLeod, 40, arrived in the UK in 2000 but was jailed after supplying class A drugs.

In June 2025, an illegal migrant who used fake documents and was jailed for fraud was granted leave to remain in the UK because she has lived here so long.

Joyce Baidoo overstayed in the UK for 25 years but an asylum court ruled she has been gone from Ghana for too long to send her back.

The 57-year-old has been in the UK without permission since 2000, even avoiding being kicked out of the country when she was jailed for fraud. The Home Office issued a deportation order in 2007 following her conviction but she has remained in the UK.

Barely one month later,/b> another Jamaican murderer won a human rights appeal to stay in the country after a judge said he has an “admirable work ethic”.

The unnamed killer has avoided deportation after an immigration court in Cardiff ruled key facts in the case had not been properly considered.

The situation raises pressing questions about balancing human rights obligations with public protection and whether reforms to deportation law, asylum procedures, or ECHR commitments are needed to prevent repeat exploitation by dangerous individuals.

Paid to Leave

In a twist of events, families of failed asylum seekers will be offered up to £40,000 to leave the UK under a trial scheme announced by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood.

Ms. Mahmood said the government would seek to forcibly remove failed asylum seekers if they do not accept “incentive payments” of up to £10,000 per person, capped at four per family, within seven days.

The government claims the scheme is expected to target about 150 families living in taxpayer-funded accommodation, and the Home Office estimates it could save £20m if successful. But at the same time, using taxpayers funding to pamper illegal migrants.

However, the Conservatives and Reform UK said the payments would incentivise people to come to the UK illegally.

London Bombings: Two Decades Since 7/7 →

Immigration: Welfare without wisdom →

Oppose ‘Islamophobia’ Definition →

Southport killer WAS a terrorist →

“Immigration Increases Strain in Britain’s EU Membership →

Moscow Crocus attack demands peace with
Ukraine and action against Islamic State →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers. So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

One in eight parents claim child has ‘a disability’

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

1 April 2026

One in eight parents now reports their child is disabled

Alarming figures now suggest that as many as one in eight children in Britain are claimed to be disabled by their parents. This includes soaring diagnoses of autism, ADHD, and behavioural conditions.

According to a Government-backed review commissioned by Wes Streeting, the rise in diagnoses does not necessarily reflect a genuine increase in illness. Instead, experts warn that ordinary childhood behaviours and distress are increasingly being “medicalised” and reframed as disorders requiring intervention.

If these figures had not come from official Government data, they could easily be dismissed as an April Fool’s headline. One in eight children now classified as disabled? Millions of young people labelled with conditions that barely registered a generation ago? It sounds absurd, yet it is being presented as reality.

Beneath the statistics lies something far more serious in the spiritual realm: a negative confession both from families and from the system itself. Where someone used to be a bit down, now he is ‘suffering from depression’. Someone concerned about something is now ‘suffering from anxiety’.

Prov 18:21 Death and life are in the power of the tongue:

What was once considered part of normal development is now too often labelled as pathology. The question must be asked: are children truly becoming more unwell, or is our society redefining normality itself? If so, are welfare schemes such as ‘Personal Independence Payments’, or PIP, to blame?

2 Timothy 1:7 For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

The Human Cost of Welfare

Picture a young girl struggling, as children often do, with life, school, and emotions, a concerned mother seeking help coupled with a system ready not to strengthen, restore, or equip but rather to diagnose, label, and ultimately declare limitation. In today’s Britain, this is no longer an exception. It is becoming the norm.

Education support worker Mary Gileece wrote about 17 year-old Jane on Daily Sceptic. (Not their real names. And worth reading in full.) Mary noted that Jane has no qualifications, no work experience, no routine, no ambition and, tragically, no expectation that she ever will.

She is not physically incapacitated. She is not beyond help. Yet she is already being sustained by the state as though her future has been settled. What Mary reports is not support, it is surrender. A system designed to help the vulnerable is writing off an entire generation before they have even begun.

2 Thessalonians 3:10 That if any would not work, neither should he eat.

The Making of Inactivity

Mary writes that Jane’s decline did not happen overnight. It followed a pattern now becoming all too familiar. After lockdown, she simply stopped going to school. Days turned into weeks, weeks into years—spent largely in her bedroom, scrolling endlessly on her phone.

At age 15, the state intervened. A team of tutors, therapists and social workers was assigned to rebuild her life, five days a week, two hours a day at significant cost and with serious effort. But without a spiritual transformation it is all in vain. After all the effort, Jane still cannot tell the time. She cannot read a bus timetable. She cannot cook, write a CV, or navigate basic daily life.

None of it is because she is incapable. But somewhere along the line, both family and the state accepted that she should not even try and paid her to stay in cultivated helplessness.

At every attempt to build her up, resistance came, not just from the girl alone, but from her mother. Teaching her to tell the time was rejected. Encouraging her to walk to a bus stop was ‘too exhausting’. Cooking was deemed too dangerous: He mother said: ‘She’s no good with hot water’. A CV was ‘Setting her up to fail.’

Personal Indolence Payment

Even basic independence was treated as a threat. The message was clear: Jane must remain incapable. And why? Because the system rewards it. Jane receives £72 a week in PIP. Her mother receives a Carer’s Allowance as of April 2026 set at £86.45 per week. ‘Jane’ and her mum are together receiving over £150 per week, as long as ‘Jane’ stays doing nothing! At no point is Jane being ‘strengthened’ or helped into work:

Ezek 16:49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.

For those on PIP, financial stability now depends not on progress, but on permanent limitation. Welfare compassion has been corrupted into dependency. ‘PIP’ could actually stand for ‘Personal Indolence Payment’. Idleness is what we are teaching our children. The scripture can be positive or negative:

Proverbs 22:6 Train up a child in the way he should go.

Scripture is clear. The genuine poor are to receive support, and to be strengthened to work. We can confess ‘death and life’ and either bless or curse ourselves and our children. We are not to accept a spirit of fear, but to live in power and love with a sound mind. Working for a living is the gift of God. We are to work quietly, and earn enough to eat our own bread. And if we refuse to work, we don’t eat.

ADHD, Autism and Mental Health Review

In December 2025, the Government launched a review into ADHD, autism and mental health services to examine rising demand for services. Experts have now reported on their initial findings.

The authors of the review said: “Historical analyses show that behaviours in children once regarded as within the range of normal variation, or even as something to be welcomed in some contexts, are now more often interpreted as requiring intervention or treatment.”

Adding that there is a “risk that a wide range of difficulties – particularly those arising from social, educational or environmental pressures – may increasingly be interpreted primarily through a medical lens”. Rising rates of diagnosis for ADHD and autism “does not necessarily mean rising prevalence” of the conditions, they added.

“Across both ADHD and autism, best currently available population-based estimates remain relatively stable, while administrative diagnoses, self-identification and recorded service demand have increased substantially. In autism, the evidence also points to particularly rapid growth in identified need within educational systems, including increasing identification among girls and among young people without learning disability.

The Figures

About 12% of children, or around 1.7 million young people, are now apparently living with a long-term illness, disability or impairment, according to fresh figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).

This has almost doubled since 2015, when roughly 7% of parents said their child had a disability, according to the department’s closely-watched Family Resources Survey (FRS).

It also comes amid a sharp increase in young people being diagnosed with behavioural issues as well as autism and ADHD. Almost two-thirds of children with a disability had a “social” or “behavioural” impairment – by far the most common issue cited by parents, the FRS found.

The figures involved ought to terrify everyone for they either reveal a population riven with ill-health and impairment or one playing the system. Perhaps a National Commission into ‘Physical Deterioration’ similar to the one conducted by Sir Almeric FitzRoy in 1904 into the poor health of Boer War recruits could find out what is causing the professed ill-health of young people. With such staggering levels of illness, there is no hope at all that our country will ever return to growth. But it could all be a complete fiction, financially, emotionally, economically, even spiritually unsustainable as well.

Brits living with a disability

As of February 2026, there are 34.33 million people aged 16+ in employment in the UK, with an employment rate of 75.0% for those aged 16 to 64. While the job market has shown resilience, unemployment has risen slightly over the past year, with 5.1% unemployment recorded in late 2025.

Those working are now supporting approximately 13.2 million state pensioners. Yet they are funding another 16.7 million people, representing a quarter of Britons, who now claim to live with a disability. More women than men claim they have an impairment, though ‘disability’ is more prevalent among boys than girls. Scottish people are more likely to say they are disabled than people living in England or Wales.

The figures show roughly 700,000 of children considered disabled are under 10. More people under 20 are also now in this category than Britons aged over 80. So we ask, who are the working class adults funding this? Should these ‘dreadful illnesses’ destroying Britons not be treated as a national crisis deserving of an immediate inquiry?

’Distress is Real’ Or is it?

Clinical psychologist at University College London and Chair of the Review Professor Peter Fonagy wrote in The Times: “Distress is real. But how we interpret and respond to it is shaped by the systems we have built.

“We need a system that is more proportionate, more responsive and less dependent on diagnosis alone. One that can offer support earlier, in a wider range of settings, and in ways that are aligned to need rather than determined by labels.

“That does not mean abandoning diagnosis. For many people, it remains essential, for understanding, for treatment, for access to support. But it does mean being more precise about what diagnosis is for, and what it is not.”

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “The Secretary of State commissioned this independent review precisely because we know too many people are not getting the support they need, and we are committed to building a system that is fair and works for everyone, with a focus on early intervention.

Yet this raises more questions. What if the ‘early intervention’ is itself to blame? What if the crisis is not rooted in widespread illness at all? What if the system is funnelling large numbers of (to be honest) perfectly healthy children who in a bygone age were simply told to pull themselves together into diagnostic categories, enriching a network of private providers, casting a generation on to the scrap heap and impoverishing those whose taxes are demanded to pay for it all?

Only national repentance proclaimed by God-fearing leaders will save our United Kingdom. This welfare scandal is not all that is wrong with Britain. But it is stark enough to make us and those who lead us ‘consider your ways’ and return to the Lord.

Social Media, the Weapon Fashioned Against Children →

Mother banned from seeing sex-ed materials →

Council cuts funding for ‘pride’ event →

Read and pray

READ: Exod 18:21; Lev 19:35-37; Deut 30:19; Psa 104:23; Prov 6:9-11, 18:21a, 22:6, 26:13; Eccl 3:13, 5:18; Ezek 16:49; Haggai 1:5-7; Matt 4:17; John 9:4; Thess 3:10; 1 Tim 2:1-6; 2Tim 1:7.

PRAY:Pray that God will restore truth in public leadership, and turn their hearts. Pray for Repentance and Godly conviction.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

After Years of Chaos, Common Sense Returns to Women’s Sport

1 April 2026

Common sense has finally returned to women’s sport.

For years, the world has been asked to celebrate what should never have been lost. Now, as the International Olympic Committee begins to restore fairness to women’s sport, many are expressing relief, but also deep frustration.

Why should anyone be grateful simply for the return of what was always right?

The idea that men and women are interchangeable in physical competition was never grounded in science, but in ideology. The suggestion that biological reality could be ignored in favour of self-identification led to a dangerous erosion of fairness, one that placed female athletes at a clear disadvantage.

If there is no difference between men and women, then the very existence of separate sporting categories becomes meaningless. Yet everyone knows that such differences are real, observable, and significant.

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image… male and female created he them.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

When Truth Is Replaced by Ideology

For decades, governing bodies abandoned clarity for confusion. Since the removal of sex-based safeguards in the 1990s, women’s sport has endured more than 25 years of uncertainty, compromise, and, ultimately, injustice.

During that time, decisions affecting men’s sport were handled swiftly and decisively. Yet when it came to protecting women, delays stretched into decades. The contrast is striking—and revealing.

Instead of evidence-based policy, rules were increasingly shaped by feelings, identity claims, and social pressure. The result was a system that prioritised inclusion at the expense of truth.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.

For years, we have seen female athletes having to push through sports with men who now claim to be women. Some have walked away right in the middle of a game. Others not willing to compete against men. Can you blame them?

In August 2024, Italian Angela Carini took only a couple of hits from Algeria’s Imane Khelif before withdrawing from the match and falling to her knees in tears- an extremely unusual occurrence in Olympic boxing.

Mr. Khelif was previously banned from competing in the world championships by the International Boxing association because he failed testosterone and gender eligibility tests.

In April 2025, the UK’s Ultimate Pool Women’s Pro Series Event 2 concluded with a final match that had no women.

The all-male final between Harriet Haynes and Lucy Smith, both “transgender-identified male”s, marked yet another grim milestone in the unravelling of women’s sports under the weight of trans ideology.

The Cost of Silence and Compromise

The consequences of these decisions have not been theoretical—they have been deeply personal and, at times, dangerous.

Allowing male-born athletes to compete in female categories has raised serious concerns about safety, fairness, and integrity. In some cases, governing bodies have been accused of acting with negligence, ignoring clear risks in pursuit of ideological alignment.

For those who spoke out, the cost has often been severe—careers damaged, reputations attacked, and voices silenced for defending what was once considered common sense.

Proverbs 31:8-9 Open thy mouth for the dumb in the cause of all such as are appointed to destruction… judge righteously, and plead the cause of the poor and needy.

Justice Delayed, Justice Denied

While recent policy shifts signal a return to biological reality at the elite level, concerns remain that fairness is not being applied consistently.

If it is acknowledged that mixed-sex competition is unsafe or unfair at the highest level, then the same principle must apply across all levels of sport—from grassroots to professional.

Anything less risks creating a system where fairness is reserved only for a select few, while others are left exposed.

Deuteronomy 16:20 That which is altogether just shalt thou follow.

A Failure of Leadership

The crisis in women’s sport did not emerge overnight, but was the result of years of poor leadership and ideological compromise.

Scientific truth was sidelined, while decision-makers chose to listen to activists rather than evidence. Only when the consequences became visible to the public—through widely broadcast competitions—did meaningful change begin.

The damage, however, has already been done, and in many cases, cannot be undone.

Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

Nanosermon: A command for diligence!

Nanosermons & Teachings

More nanosermons and teachings →

1 April 2026

Listen to our nanosermons on:
Soul Food Gospel Radio every Monday, repeated every Wednesday, at 10.00am UK time.
Heartsong Live Radio Scotland (DAB) Mondays – Sundays 8.30am & 2.30pm UK time.
So Arise Radio Antigua & Barbuda Mondays and Fridays at 7:30 AM AST (11.30 am GMT).
FitFM Jamaica every Sunday at 10am EST (3pm GMT).
(Atlantic Standard Time is always 4 hours behind GMT. Eastern Standard Time is always 5 hours behind GMT).

Know the mind of God. Read the whole Bible in one year:

Watch this nanosermon here:

Nanosermon Script:

Come with me to Psalm one hundred and nineteen, and verse four:

Psa 119:4 Thou hast commanded us to keep thy precepts diligently.

So far in this mighty psalm we have seen what the famous nineteenth-century preacher Charles Spurgeon described as a ‘double blessing’ in the first two verses:

Psa 119:1 ALEPH. Blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the LORD.
And
Psa 119:2 Blessed are they that keep his testimonies, and that seek him with the whole heart.

When you are determined to be undefiled by sin, walking day by day in his law, when God is a living reality to you and you seek him wholeheartedly, you are blessed and blessed again. Then something dramatic happens in your heart:

Psa 119:3 They also do no iniquity: they walk in his ways.

Walk in God’s ways

Not only are you blessed by God, it becomes instinctive in you to turn from sin and walk in God’s ways, not those of the world. Now, in verse four, as if to emphasise the point, the psalmist reminds us that God has commanded us to keep his precepts, or commandments, diligently, that is both carefully and enthusiastically.

Of course, you may say, ‘I can’t do that without Christ’ or ‘without the Holy Spirit.’ Then pray to be so in Christ and so filled with the Holy Spirit that you do it. Be sure the devil is diligent at trying to drive a wedge between you and the Lord, to steal your blessing. So when temptation comes, just as diligently refuse it. Simply walk in his ways and keep his precepts.

This verse, like all the first eight verses in psalm one hundred and nineteen, begins with the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, the letter ‘aleph’, which here begins the word attaw, the second person singular pronoun, translated in the King James Version as ‘thou’. ‘Thou’ is not a respectful address, it is one of familiarity, but my, what a respectful sentiment it leads into!

’Careful obedience’

Spurgeon said, about this verse: ‘God’s precepts require careful obedience: there is no keeping them by accident. Some give to God a careless service, a sort of hit or miss obedience, but the Lord has not commanded such service, nor will he accept it.

‘His law demands the love of all our heart, soul, mind, and strength; and a careless religion has none of these. We are also called to zealous obedience. We are to keep the precepts abundantly.’

He draws this parallel: ‘As a man diligent in business arouses himself to do as much trade as he can, so must we be eager to serve the Lord as much as possible. Those who are diligent in business rise up early and sit up late, and deny themselves much of comfort and repose.

‘They are not soon tired, or if they are they persevere even with aching brow and weary eye. So should we serve the Lord. Such service he demands, and will be content with nothing less.’

Obedience vs ‘legalism’

And Spurgeon goes on: ‘God has not commanded us to be diligent in making precepts, but in keeping them. Some bind yokes upon their own necks, and make bonds and rules for others: but the wise course is to be satisfied with the rules of holy Scripture, and to strive to keep them all, in all places, towards all men, and in all respects.’

Now, you might be concerned to avoid what you may think of as ‘legalism’. As Spurgeon just pointed out, if by that you mean following man-made regulations, you could be right, but if you mean a close adherence to the moral laws which God has laid down in scripture, that isn’t legalism, that’s just obedience.

I want to reassure you that no-one will ever be barred from heaven because he kept the laws of God too diligently. It’s God’s command to keep his precepts diligently, and your responsibility to obey and make your double blessing secure.

SCRIPT ENDS

Bible Reading Plan

In the link below you’ll find a Bible reading plan to help you read through the Bible in one year in a smart and structured way. It’s only a pound or two and worth every penny. It’s helped me, and it’ll help you.

If you only start half-way through a year, it’s no matter. You’re going to want to read it again and again anyway, aren’t you? So don’t lose any time, start reading your Bible now and holding those in office to account before King Jesus.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Council submits ‘unlawful’ plans to fly ‘trans Pride flag’

Homosexuality & Trans

31 March 2026

A Labour-run council is facing mounting criticism over plans to fly the “Progress Pride flag” outside the city’s Guildhall, with campaigners warning the move may be unlawful.

Christians and women’s rights groups argue the Plymouth council’s decision breaches the requirement for political neutrality under the Local Government Act 1986, raising serious questions about whether public institutions are overstepping their legal boundaries.

What is presented as a gesture of inclusion is a clear departure from neutrality into ideological endorsement.

This flag is far from neutral. Instead, it is a loaded political symbol, one tied to contested ideologies and ongoing legal debates surrounding gender, identity, and the protection of women’s spaces.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.

1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace.

Support NCCSS / Christian Voice →

Legal Warnings and Growing Opposition

For Women Scotland warned the decision is “reckless” and legally questionable, particularly in light of recent rulings affirming the biological definition of sex under equality law.

Public bodies should not be used to advance contested ideologies at the expense of legal clarity and public trust.

The Progress Pride flag is an amended version of the 1978 rainbow-coloured Pride flag and includes black, brown, pink, pale blue and white stripes, which represent people of colour in the LGBTQ+ community, the trans community, and those living with HIV/Aids.

Under the plans submitted by the council, the flag will be flown during LGBT+ History Month in February, the International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia in May and Pride in June.

Proverbs 17:15 He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord.

A Pattern Emerging Across the UK

Similar disputes have emerged across the country, including challenges to councils displaying transgender symbols and markings in public spaces.

A Labour-controlled council faced mounting criticism after announcing plans to fly a ‘trans-inclusive Pride flag’ outside its town hall for 30 days every year until 2030.

Ipswich Borough Council said it intends to raise the ‘Progress Pride flag’ annually, despite objections from women’s rights organisations who argue the gesture violates the Local Government Act 1986, which requires local authorities to avoid political campaigning.

This reflects a broader trend of institutions aligning themselves with ideological movements, rather than maintaining impartiality. Concerns have also been raised that such actions risk marginalising those who hold differing views, particularly women who argue their rights and spaces are being eroded.

Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind.

Reform UK councillor under fire for defending Britain’s Christian identity →

Council Defends ‘Inclusivity’

In response, Plymouth City Council defended its plans, insisting the flag is not political but a representation of people and diversity within the city.

Officials stated the move reflects a commitment to inclusion and ensuring all residents feel “valued, respected and represented.” However, we maintain that neutrality is being sacrificed in favour of ideological signalling, raising concerns about the role of public institutions in shaping cultural narratives.

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

A Call to Discernment

At the heart of the controversy lies a deeper question: should public authorities act as neutral bodies serving all citizens equally, or as platforms for advancing contested social ideologies?

For many, this is not merely a policy dispute but a moral and spiritual issue—one that calls for discernment, courage, and a return to truth.

As debates intensify, the need for clarity, conviction, and righteousness in public life has never been greater.

Micah 6:8 He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?

‘Women’ are ‘people with ovaries’ in city council →

Council cuts funding for ‘pride’ event →

Christian councillor suspended for ‘Pride is a sin’ →

‘Ealing Council strikes at freedom of assembly →

Read and pray

READ: Gen 1:27; Gen 1:27; Exod 18:21; Lev 19:35-37; Isa 5:20, 45:9-10; 2 Chron 7:14; Psalm 9:17; 144:15; Prov 14:34; Matt 9:12; John 17:17; Rom 3:13; 1 Tim 3:2-4; Heb 5:14

PRAY:Pray that people will recognise truth and not be led by confusion or deception.

Pray that what is right will not be redefined or distorted in public life.

Pray that Christians will stand firm in faith, speak truth with boldness, and not be silent.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

King Charles Becomes Patron of Jewish Charity

29 March 2026

King Charles delivers his woke Christmas Message 2025

King Charles III has taken on a significant new role, becoming patron of the Community Security Trust, the organisation responsible for monitoring antisemitism and protecting Jewish communities across Britain.

The announcement, made during the charity’s annual fundraising dinner, marks a clear and public stance from the monarch in support of a community facing increasing hostility. It also signals a broader commitment to confronting antisemitism at a national level.

The decision reflects the King’s longstanding support for interfaith engagement and social cohesion. His record has consistently emphasised dialogue between different faiths and the promotion of mutual respect.

According to the Community Security Trust , the monarch’s decision to accept the patronage reflects “His Majesty’s long-standing support for the UK’s Jewish community and the wider fight against antisemitism”.

This development, while part of a broader review of royal patronages, reinforces the importance of unity in a time of growing division. How it sits with His Majesty’s promotion of Islam, whose scriptures command the murder of Jews, is a question only he can answer. (See previous articles below)

Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

Ephesians 4:3 Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.

A Timely Intervention Amid Rising Threats

The announcement comes during a particularly difficult period for Britain’s Jewish population, with concerns over antisemitic incidents continuing to rise.

It follows a serious arson attack in Golders Green, where vehicles belonging to a Jewish volunteer ambulance service were set on fire in the early hours. The incident, now being treated as a hate crime, caused significant damage and heightened fears within the community.

In this context, the King’s support carries added significance, offering reassurance at a time of increased vulnerability.

The role represents more than ceremonial backing—it underscores the importance of standing against hatred and ensuring that all communities are protected.

At a time when tensions are rising, such leadership highlights the enduring need for justice, accountability, and the protection of human dignity.

Psalm 9:9 The Lord also will be a refuge for the oppressed, a refuge in times of trouble.

Isaiah 1:17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.

Why King’s 2025 Christmas Message was ‘on-message’ →

The Quiet Revival

Bible Society retracts false Quiet Revival claims

The Bible Society has retracted its claims that there is a quiet revival of Christianity in Britain based on a faulty and unreliable YouGov survey.

What was described as a “quiet revival” of Christianity led by Gen Z and younger adults offered a glimpse of renewed spiritual hunger in Britain.

For years, church decline had dominated the narrative. Yet emerging data suggested something different: a generation beginning to rediscover faith, community, and purpose.

Even as questions have been raised about the accuracy of the figures, the wider message endures,there are signs that people, particularly the young, are turning back to the Church in search of something deeper.

The polling, carried out by YouGov, had found churchgoing rose by 50 per cent between 2018 and 2024, led by Gen Z and younger adults. This equated to an estimated two million more people attending church.

The Church of England championed the report with much fanfare, repeatedly citing it in its research, publications and sermons.

Even Dame Sarah Mullally, the newly enthroned Archbishop of Canterbury, alluded to it in her first presidential address to the General Synod, the Church of England’s lawmaking body, in February.

She said: “There are early indications of a rise in attendance and participation having continued over the last year. Of course, we must be cautious. These are early figures, but the trend is clear.

“People are returning to the Church. They are finding a welcome, friendship, community, meaning and purpose. And we rejoice with God in these green shoots of hope.”

Representing The Cross

Paul Robinson, who leads the Christian charity Release International, will carry the cross up the peak | FACEBOOK

Meanwhile, the leader of a Christian charity is preparing for an extraordinary act of faith where he will carry the cross to the top of England’s tallest mountain.

Paul Robinson, who leads the Christian charity Release International, has been undertaking rigorous training ahead of the Light Walk, during which he intends to haul a wooden cross to the peak of Scafell Pike.

Mr Robinson says his endeavour aims to demonstrate unity with Christians facing persecution across the globe.

The event will see him trek through darkness with the timber structure, reaching the 978-metre summit as the sun rises.

He added his journey represents a physical expression of support for believers who cannot worship freely.

A team of volunteers will accompany Mr Robinson on the demanding nocturnal ascent, which typically requires between three and four hours to complete.

Read and pray

READ: Isa 26:2; 1Sam 13:14; Judges 10:13; Psa 9:17; Numb 32:23; Jer 26:13; 2Chr 7:14.

PRAY: Thank God for the King and for the grace to stand for the right cause.
Pray for revival in our country.
Pray that God will protect vulnerable communities from hatred, falsehood, and harm, and that justice will not be compromised by cultural or political pressure.
Pray for wisdom and discernment for leaders, authorities, and institutions, that they will uphold justice without bias and stand firmly against all forms of injustice.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Previous Articles about King Charles

King’s & William’s most important project! →

Charles: Was Synagogue Attack ‘Out of the Blue’? →

King Charles Endorses Sodomy →

King Charles preaches Net Zero at COP28 →

King Charles’s cult of Climate Change hits the buffers of Uxbridge… →

A king for the people? →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

How Is ‘Jews Eating Babies’ Not Considered Offensive?

28 March 2026

The artwork was met with backlash from Jewish community groups | X: ZOE STRIMPEL

An art exhibition has sparked outrage after featuring grotesque imagery depicting jews eating babies, yet authorities have declined to investigate, ruling the work neither abusive nor criminal.

The exhibition, titled “Drawings Against Genocide,” which took place at an art gallery in Margate, Kent has been defended as political commentary. But to many, it represents something far more troubling: the normalisation of deeply offensive and dehumanising imagery under the banner of “art.”

Jewish community groups have condemned the display as not only “sickening” but dangerous, warning that such portrayals echo some of history’s darkest propaganda.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.

A Dangerous Double Standard

Kent Police concluded that the artwork did not meet the threshold for a hate crime or even a non-crime hate incident. Their reasoning: the images targeted the Israeli state, not Jewish people directly.

This distinction has raised serious concerns. Because when imagery historically used to demonise Jews, such as blood libel tropes, reappears in modern form, that intent becomes secondary to impact. The question is no longer what is said explicitly, but what is unmistakably implied.

Exodus 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness

Among the pieces displayed were drawings of figures consuming babies and depictions of Israelis as horned devils proclaiming “we love death.” Another portrayed a soldier standing on a skull under the slogan “New Order Forever Now.”

The artist, Matthew Collings, denied that the images represented Jews, insisting they were critiques of Zionism and the Israeli state.

Such imagery cannot be separated from centuries-old antisemitic narratives. The visual language used is not neutral, it is historically loaded, inflammatory, and deeply provocative.

1 Thessalonians 5:22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.

Community Fears Ignored

Labour Against Antisemitism has called for the case to be reopened, warning that the decision reflects a failure to grasp the realities of modern antisemitism.

In a letter to Kent’s chief constable Tim Smith, the group highlighted rising threats against Jewish communities, arguing that such exhibitions contribute to a climate of hostility.

The letter said: “It lacks any real understanding of contemporary antisemitism and empathy for a community experiencing record levels of anti-Jewish racism that include a deadly attack at a Manchester synagogue, and now the burning of Jewish ambulances.

“A number of terror plots aimed at the Jewish community have been uncovered only recently. These do not happen in a vacuum.

“Exhibitions such as Matthew Collings’ incite hatred towards our community. They increase community tensions and create a hostile environment for Jewish people.”

They warned that incidents of violence and intimidation do not occur in isolation—but are fuelled by narratives that dehumanise and vilify.

Psalm 82:3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy.

Yom Kippur Attack exposes elite’s antisemitism →< Judicial corruption: Two-Tier Justice →

Political Leaders Speak Out

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp criticised the decision by Kent Police

Criticism has also come from political figures, including Chris Philp, Shadow Home Secretary who questioned Kent Police’s decision, saying: “Freedom of expression should of course be protected, but these pictures are clearly full of sickening antisemitic tropes.

“It is exactly this kind of appalling imagery that leads to attacks on our Jewish communities like the events in Golders Green.

“Our forces must step up efforts to protect the Jewish community from vile hate crimes. Kent should reopen this investigation immediately.”

He argued that while freedom of expression must be protected, it should not become a shield for what he described as vile and dangerous content.

The tension between free speech and public harm now sits at the centre of the debate.

Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

Freedom Without Responsibility?

In defending its position, Kent Police maintained that the artwork falls under protected political expression, with no evidence of intent to incite hatred.

But this raises a deeper question: when does expression cross into provocation? And who decides when a line has been crossed?

As society wrestles with these questions, one reality remains clear—when deeply offensive imagery is dismissed as acceptable, the consequences may extend far beyond the gallery walls.

What is tolerated today shapes what is normalised tomorrow.

Hosea 8:7 For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.</b

Southport killer WAS a terrorist →

City bans Muslim festivals →

Oppose ‘Islamophobia’ Definition →

Read and pray

READ: Isa 26:2; 1Sam 13:14; Judges 10:13; Psa 9:17; Numb 32:23; Jer 26:13; 2Chr 7:14.

PRAY: Pray that truth and righteousness will prevail in society, and that what is evil will no longer be disguised, justified, or celebrated as acceptable.

Pray that God will protect vulnerable communities from hatred, falsehood, and harm, and that justice will not be compromised by cultural or political pressure.

Pray for wisdom and discernment for leaders, authorities, and institutions, that they will uphold justice without bias and stand firmly against all forms of injustice.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Send for your Free Christian Voice Newsletter (Easter 2026)

UK Christian Constitution

27 March 2026

Our flagship newsletter, published by God’s grace ten times a year, with fifteen pages of Bible-based contemporary content, only goes out by post. It contains a round-up of our social media activity, including articles on this website. There is some confidential prayer and action information for Christians which does not appear online.

Fill in the form below for a free copy. UK ONLY.

Our Easter 2026 newsletter leads on a call for our elites to proclaim the King of kings in the face of what can only be seen as a judgment falling upon this United Kingdom. Muslims held an open-air Iftar in Trafalgar Square complete with an ‘Adhan’, a proclamation of Islamic supremacy. It was an act of domination, in the same week that our House of Lords voted in favour of abortion up to birth.

We also report that the heir to the throne, Prince William, scarcely has any faith in the King of kings. We analyse King Charles’s Christmas message, asking why it was so ‘on message’, with constant references to ‘communities’ and diversity’. Add in the result of the Gorton and Denton by-election, won in February 2026 by the antichrist Green Party, and we have an emergency. The need for the Church in our land to emerge as a prophetic voice could not be clearer. You can be part of the solution!

So fill in the form below for your free copy (UK only):

Support us as well!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Will Hungary Stand, or Fall to the Globalists?

25 March 2026

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Fidesz scored 44.2 percent, significantly lower than polls had predicted. | Attila Kisbenedek/AFP via Getty Images

Prime Minister Viktor Orban with President Donald Trump.

This is a call to prayer! Hungary stands on the brink of decisive national elections that will determine the future direction of its government and parliament.

On Sunday 12th April 2026, voters will elect representatives to the National Assembly, deciding whether Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his ruling party will continue to shape the country’s political and moral landscape for righteousness and their Christian heritage.

These elections are not merely administrative; they represent a deeper ideological contest between national sovereignty and external influence, between traditional values and progressive liberalism.

At stake is not only Hungary’s domestic policy but its place within Europe and the wider global order. Tibor Fischer explains it all here.

Proverbs 29:2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.

Foreign Money and Influence: Attempts to Unseat Orbán

Reports have emerged alleging that significant foreign funding is being channelled into Hungary to bolster opposition forces seeking to unseat Viktor Orbán.

According to investigations, networks linked to George Soros and elements within the U.S. Democratic political sphere are accused of funnelling millions into opposition campaigns.

Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, addressing the nation on state media, spotlighted a classified national security report slated for declassification that proves Ukrainian involvement in funnelling cash to Tisza.

“This is not speculation or a suspicion; it’s documented in a written report submitted to the national security committee,” Mr. Orbán declared.

He revealed that Hungarian authorities seized tens of millions in cash connected to Ukraine’s bank right on Hungarian territory.

This represents a coordinated effort to reshape Hungary’s political landscape from outside its borders, raising serious concerns about sovereignty, electoral integrity, and the role of global actors in domestic affairs.

Psalm 12:8 The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.

Why Orbán Faces Opposition

Prime minister Viktor Orbán has drawn sustained criticism from international actors for his firm stance against what he describes as globalist overreach.

His government has resisted European Union expansionism, asserting Hungary’s right to determine its own policies without external imposition.

Central to this resistance is his opposition to figures like George Soros, whose advocacy for open societies and migration policies has clashed sharply with Mr. Orbán’s vision of national identity and border control.

This ideological divide has made Hungary a focal point in a broader geopolitical struggle.

Amos 5:10 They hate him that rebuketh in the gate, and they abhor him that speaketh uprightly.

linked Funding Streams

For years, a network of foreign-backed funding channels, linked to political actors in the United States, has been accused of directing substantial financial support toward opposition movements in Hungary.

Particular attention has been drawn to the role of agencies such as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), both of which operate with public funding while supporting civil society initiatives abroad.

Since 2008, USAID has reportedly funded a range of Hungarian NGOs, with figures suggesting that more than $20 million was distributed between 2021 and 2025, including support for media outlets such as 444.hu and Átlátszó.

Programmes like USAID’s Central Europe initiative, launched in 2022, have been presented as efforts to strengthen democratic institutions. However, such initiatives risk influencing domestic politics by bolstering organisations aligned with opposition causes.

Reports indicate that outlets like Átlátszó have received a notable portion of their funding through these channels, while Hungary’s Sovereignty Protection Office has identified USAID-linked funding streams supporting activist networks, including organisations such as the Autonomy Foundation.

National Endowment for Democracy’s Role

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has also been criticised for having granted funds to anti-government media and civil groups since 2008. According to its own annual reporting, the organisation supports thousands of projects globally each year, including initiatives within Hungary.

In 2018, organisations associated with NED funding such as the Hungarian Helsinki Committee came under political attack and were labelled “Soros Mecenaries”, accused of contributing to domestic political tensions.

Between 2008 and 2016, total grants to Hungarian-related initiatives are reported to have exceeded $5 million, often described as supporting goals like “media pluralism” during periods of economic and political instability.

Supporters argue these programmes are intended to strengthen democratic institutions and civil society, while critics contend they amount to undue external influence in Hungary’s internal affairs.

Electoral Humiliation

Reeling from the aftermath of the 2016 election, some Democratic-aligned figures and networks framed their subsequent efforts as part of a broader mission to “protect” or “save” democratic processes. Within that context, Higher Ground Laboratories (HGL) was established in 2017 by former Obama-Biden campaign affiliates, including Betsy Hoover, Shomik Dutta, and Elizabeth MacLaughlin, positioning itself as a Chicago-based venture fund focused on progressive political technology.

By 2021, HGL had reportedly invested fifty million dollars across a portfolio of startups, reflecting a growing ecosystem of digital tools aimed at political organising and campaigning. Among its notable transactions was a majority investment in DatAdat, a political technology firm later rebranded as Estratos Digital and operating across both the United States and Europe. Supporters of such investments describe them as part of a globalisation of campaign infrastructure and data-driven political engagement. However, the export of advanced campaign technologies into foreign political environments raises questions about influence, transparency, and the role of external actors in domestic electoral processes.

Attention has also been drawn to the use of platforms such as Lunda, associated with Estratos Digital and reportedly utilised in fundraising and campaign activities by political actors including Hungary’s Tisza Party.

Reports of a data breach in 2026, which allegedly exposed personal and transactional information belonging to thousands of individuals, further intensified scrutiny.

The Transparency Law: A Flashpoint with Globalists

Opposition lawmakers lit flares in protest during the voting session. — Opposition lawmakers lit flares in protest during the voting session

One of the most contentious measures introduced under Viktor Orbán’s leadership is Hungary’s Transparency Act, adopted on 13th June 2017. The law requires organisations receiving more than $1,300 annually from foreign sources to register as entities “receiving support from abroad.”

The legislation simply deals with registration and does not ban such organisations or restrict their operations. It seeks to ensure transparency in foreign funding. Notably, it exempts religious groups, sports associations, and national minority organisations.

Despite its limited scope, the law has provoked strong backlash from international critics, who argue it targets civil society. The globalist-funded Hungary opposition, fearing exposure, lit flares in the voting session. Supporters, however, view it as a necessary safeguard against undisclosed foreign influence in national affairs.

John 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light.

Migration Policy: Defiance of EU Pressure

Hungary has consistently refused to participate in the European Union’s migration redistribution schemes, maintaining strict border controls and rejecting quotas for migrant resettlement. The government argues that such policies are essential for preserving national security and cultural identity.

This stance has placed Hungary at odds with EU authorities, who advocate for shared responsibility among member states.

For Mr. Orbán’s administration, however, migration is not merely a logistical issue but a defining question of sovereignty and national preservation.

Proverbs 22:3 A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself.

“LGBT” Laws and Political Divide

Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party has taken a firm stance on cultural issues, particularly regarding “LGBT” policies.

The government has enacted laws restricting the promotion of homosexuality to minors and recently banned Pride marches, citing concerns about child welfare.

Prime Minister Viktor Orbán defended the measures, stating that “woke ideology” would not be allowed to influence children. These policies stand in stark contrast to those of opposition groups, who advocate for expanded LGBT rights and alignment with broader European liberal standards.

“Pride” marches had been held for the past 30 years in Hungary. Opposition lawmakers lit flares during the voting session on Tuesday, while demonstrators blocked a bridge in central Budapest. Human rights groups have also condemned the move.

On the other side of the coin, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has brought in a raft of tax breaks to encourage couples to have children. Already, reports Population Research Institute, and the Hungarian Center for Fundamental Rights, these have raised the birth rate from 1.4 to 1.6. But Mr Orbán is seeking to raise it closer to replacement level of 2.1, at least. Abortion has also fallen, reports US-based Students for Life.

This cultural divide has become a central battleground in Hungarian politics, reflecting deeper disagreements about identity, family, and societal values.

Romans 12:2 Be not conformed to this world.

Georgia’s ‘foreign agents’ bill signed into law →

Foreign Policy and a Call to Prayer

Hungary’s foreign policy, particularly its more measured stance toward Russia, has further isolated it from some Western allies. While critics accuse Viktor Orbán of being too accommodating, supporters argue that his approach prioritises national interest over geopolitical pressure.

As Hungary approaches these pivotal elections, the outcome carries implications far beyond its borders. For many, it represents a test case in the struggle between national sovereignty and global ideological movements.

Christian Voice calls for prayer that righteousness, truth, and justice will prevail. The direction Hungary takes will not only shape its own future but may influence the moral and political trajectory of Europe. Should it fall to policies that reject biblical truth, the consequences will be felt far wider.

Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

Sri Lanka pro-gay NGO is foreign agent →

Forming a Christian Voice National Affiliate →

Ghana: Beyond foreign aid →

Read and pray

READ: Gen 1:27; Gen 1:27; Prov 14:34; Isa 5:20; Psalm 33:12; 2 Chron7:14; Mic 6:8; Rom 13:3; Amos 5:24.

PRAY: Pray that righteousness will prevail in Hungary’s elections, and that leaders who uphold truth, justice, and moral order will be established.

Pray that every ungodly influence, deception, and external manipulation seeking to undermine the nation will be exposed and brought to nothing.

Pray that Hungary will stand firm in its sovereignty and values, resisting pressure to conform to policies that contradict truth.

Pray that the nation will not fall into godless leadership, but remain a light that upholds what is right—for if Hungary falls, the consequences will echo far beyond its borders.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Nanosermon: Judging Angels

Nanosermons & Teachings

More nanosermons and teachings →

25 March 2026

Know the mind of God. Read the whole Bible in one year:

Watch this nanosermon here:

Nanosermon Script:

Are you going to be judging angels? Sounds scary, doesn’t it? The Apostle Paul told the church in Corinth, in chapter six of his first letter to them:

1Corinthians 6:2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

In my NanoSermons ‘Minsters of God’ and ‘A Prophetic church’ I show that the church and those in it, that’s you and me, have a prophetic duty to preach the word of God and call earthly rulers to account. But now the blessed Apostle goes further. He looks ahead to the millennial Kingdom of Christ and says ‘the saints shall judge the world.’

’Angels of light’ are demons

Then he steps it up: ‘we shall judge angels.’ Wow. I’m taking it that these are the bad guys. These are the angels who joined in Lucifer’s rebellion and were cast down from heaven to earth, to wreak havoc until the day of judgment, which is what Paul is referring to. Another word for them might be demons.

These angels are really popular in New Age thought. They can appear beautiful, clothed in light. People think they have ‘ageless wisdom’. One New Age website owner describes her ‘guardian angel’ as ‘a luminous giving soul’. She says this angel ‘generously offered to share her Angel Oracle passages. Beautifully crafted she weaves her words together to form crystalline stories that hold you spellbound’.

I’m sure she does. And I’m confident there are thousands more like her, or him, or whatever it is. But it’s still a demon. Even Satan can appear as an angel of light. Yes, just because you think you are hearing from an angel, doesn’t mean he’s one of the good guys.

Revelation and Daniel

Now then, is Paul out on a limb saying the saints shall judge the world and these fallen angels? No, here is what the Apostle John saw in Revelation chapter 20 (It’s not ‘Revelations’ in the plural, by the way):

Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

You know, you always need the Old Testament to understand the New Testament, and nowhere is that more true than in the Revelation to John. That idea, of the saints sitting in judgment, is straight from Daniel chapter seven:

Daniel 7:27 And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.

We’ll bind kings with chains

In its turn, Daniel’s vision is true to Psalm 149:

Psalm 149:5 Let the saints be joyful in glory: let them sing aloud upon their beds. 6 Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a twoedged sword in their hand; 7 To execute vengeance upon the heathen, and punishments upon the people; 8 To bind their kings with chains, and their nobles with fetters of iron; 9 To execute upon them the judgment written: this honour have all his saints. Praise ye the LORD.

Now then. Before you get too excited after all that scripture, swinging your two-edged sword, whose authority will you be under when judging the world, the heathen, the people, the kings and nobles and of course the angels?

The Torah IS the ‘Law of Love’

You will be under the authority of the most High God. So whose laws will you be applying? That’s right. Those of the most High. And where do you find them? In Holy Scripture, in the law-word of God. And don’t tell me we shall be judging by the ‘law of love’ as if that is different from what you see in Exodus or Deuteronomy. God’s Torah, his law, including his moral and judicial law, IS the ‘law of love.’

So you had better start getting familiar with the word of God, hadn’t you? If you have not yet read the Bible through, get the Christian Voice Lamplight Bible Reading plan and start today.

Well, you won’t be much good judging angels if you don’t, will you?

SCRIPT ENDS

Bible Reading Plan

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Olympics see sense but “TransWoman” Represents UK Endometriosis Charity

Homosexuality & Trans

23 March 2026

Steph Richards has been appointed to a parliamentary engagement role at an endometriosis charity | LINKEDIN: STEPH RICHARDS

The International Olympic Committee has said only real women may now compete in women’s events, but here in the UK, Outrage has erupted following the appointment of a “transgender woman” to a parliamentary engagement role at an endometriosis charity. (All our links open in a new tab – no need to ‘right-click’.)

Steph Richards, 73, who the media say ‘was born male’, is a bloke. To clarify, he wasn’t ‘born male’ or ‘assigned male at birth’, he IS a man. And he has been tasked with liaising with MPs on behalf of Endometriosis South Coast. Here is its ‘team’. Despite last April’s Supreme Court ruling the sex is biological, whole swathes of the Establishment persist in spitting in the face of God. His word says:

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Indeed, the Lord Jesus himself asked the Pharisees:

Matt 19:4 … Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female?

Trustees ‘have not read’

No, the trustees of Endometriosis South Coast (who include Michaela Saunders-Hall, who works, almost inevitably, at the woke National Trust), ‘have not read’, and are now at war with reality.

The charity is financially supported by public money through Portsmouth City Council and by insurance giant Aviva. And it is a great shame that what could be a good work is undermined by the pro-trans fanaticism of its leadership.

The appointment has reignited fierce debate over representation in issues uniquely affecting women, particularly as endometriosis is a condition rooted entirely in female biology.

How do they think it is remotely possible for a man to represent a cause he has absolutely no idea about? Placing a fellow who thinks growing his hair, dabbing on some lipstick and pitching up in dress makes him a woman in such a role undermines the lived realities of women suffering from the condition.

Endometriosis is a chronic, often painful condition where tissue similar to the lining of the uterus (endometrium) grows outside the uterus—commonly on ovaries, fallopian tubes, and pelvic tissues.

‘Steph’ Richards previously served as chief executive of the organisation, seriously, but stepped down in 2024 following a backlash from women’s rights campaigners, who described the leadership as “insulting.” The return in a parliamentary-facing role has intensified concerns, particularly given Mr Richards’ founding of TransLucent, an organisation campaigning for the “gender-diverse community.” How can a ship of fools who just cannot learn basic biology possibly run a serious health charity?

Galatians 6:7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

“An Absolutely Ridiculous Appointment”

Novelist Amanda Craig, who personally suffered from endometriosis, described the appointment as “absolutely ridiculous,” adding that it was “fundamentally discordant and wrong.”

She emphasised the deeply personal nature of the condition, stating that such roles “absolutely need to be represented by someone with lived experience.” Her criticism reflects wider concerns that ideological considerations are being placed above biological reality.

Similarly, Rosie Duffield branded the appointment “inappropriate,” echoing the growing unease among those who argue that women’s issues are increasingly being redefined through the lens of gender ideology.

The controversy comes against a backdrop of frustration among women who have long struggled to have conditions like endometriosis taken seriously. The suggestion that representation can now be detached from biological experience has only deepened that frustration.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.

Our previous article, exposes men with fetishes attempting to hijack womanhood lays bare the full extent of this madness.

Judges Trained by Activist Groups

Scottish employment judges given given a training session by one group to ‘raise awareness’ of ‘protected characteristics’ Credit: Andrew Aitchison/Getty

Alongside these developments, concerns have also emerged over the influence of gender ideology within the judicial system.

Employment judges across the UK have received “trans awareness” training delivered by activist organisations, including Scottish Trans and Gendered Intelligence.

In two sessions, they were told how to refer to trans people during proceedings and what issues they faced in the workplace.

These sessions instructed judges on how to approach cases involving trans-identifying individuals, including guidance on terminology, workplace issues, and what were described as their “responsibilities” regarding “trans identities.” One such session, delivered by Gendered Intelligence, lasted 90 minutes and challenged the idea that biological sex is a fixed category.

Gendered Intelligence, an English charity that claims that biological sex is not a “settled scientific category”, delivered a session in 2018 to employment judges in England and Wales.

Such training risks embedding ideological assumptions into legal processes, potentially compromising the impartiality expected of the judiciary.

Deuteronomy 16:19 Thou shalt not wrest judgment.

Stop transgenderism now! →

Concerns Over Legal Outcomes and Institutional Influence

A group of nurses from County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust (CDDFT) have lodged an employment tribunal case for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment.

In 2019, a representative from Scottish Trans gave a presentation to Scottish employment judges to “raise awareness” of “protected characteristics”. The group is part of the Equality Network – an LGBT charity funded by the SNP that supported former Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon’s controversial self-ID reforms.

According to the Telegraph, it is possible that Sandy Kemp, the judge who presided over the Sandie Peggie tribunal, could have attended the Scottish Trans session in 2019, as he had been appointed the previous year. However, a spokesman for the judiciary would not confirm which specific employment judges took part in the sessions.

Fears over the influence of pro-trans groups have been raised after a string of gender-critical claimants saw their claims dismissed by Scottish judges in recent months – including Ms Peggie, who had most of her claims against NHS Fife dismissed last December.

Maya Forstater, the chief executive of sex-based rights charity Sex Matters, said: “Training by Scottish Trans, as well as other engagement with transactivists, raises questions about the influence of gender ideology on the Scottish judiciary.

Scottish Tory MSP Pam Gosal said that the trans groups’ involvement confirms “how deeply embedded the SNP’s dangerous trans ideology is across our public institutions.”

Beyond the courts, Scottish Trans has also advised prosecutors and contributed to prison policies allowing men to be housed in female prisons under certain conditions—policies now facing legal challenge.

Proverbs 17:15 He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just… are abomination.

Dismissed Cases

In February 2026, an Edinburgh judge dismissed the claims of a prison custody officer who had been dismissed for refusing to refer to male inmates as “she”.

In the same month, an engineer at a defence firm lost her case after challenging a policy that allowed trans-identifying men access to female bathrooms, while, by contrast, a group of NHS nurses in Darlington successfully brought a similar claim in January.

This growing disparity has fuelled concerns that the Scottish judiciary is diverging from its English counterparts, which can be attributed to the influence of activist groups such as Scottish Trans.

The organisation’s reach extends beyond judicial training; it has advised legal authorities across Scotland, including the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), where in 2021 it contributed guidance on the use of preferred names and pronouns in criminal cases.

While officials insist such guidance remains under review, Scottish Trans has also played a role in shaping controversial 2023 prison policies permitting male-born individuals to be housed in female prisons if deemed not an “unacceptable risk”—policies now subject to legal challenge by For Women Scotland.

Former prison governor Rhona Hotchkiss further revealed that the group’s influence was significant during the drafting process, describing them as effectively “friends” of those shaping the guidelines due to their alignment with the policies of Nicola Sturgeon’s government.

Trans Ideology in Public Institutions

The developments in both the charity sector and the judiciary point to a broader trend: the growing influence of gender ideology across public institutions. From healthcare representation to legal training, critics argue that biological truth is increasingly being sidelined in favour of ideological conformity.

The political backdrop is also significant. Policies and advisory roles linked to organisations such as Equality Network have been supported by the government of Nicola Sturgeon, raising concerns about how deeply embedded such views have become.

For us at Christian Voice, these developments reflect a deeper moral and spiritual issue. Scripture affirms the created order of male and female, and warns against the confusion of truth. As these debates intensify, the call remains clear: to uphold truth, defend what is right, and resist the erosion of God-given distinctions in both law and society.

Isaiah 9:16 For the leaders of this people cause them to err.

IWD: “Reject Hijacking by Men With Fetishes” →

Who is defying the Supreme Court’s biological realities ? →

NHS Nurses ‘Trans’ Dispute Cost Taxpayers £600k →

The promiscuous, predatory world of male homosexuality →

“Police should not march with pride” →

Christian councillor suspended for ‘Pride is a sin’ →

‘Ealing Council strikes at freedom of assembly →

Read and pray

READ: Gen 1:27; Gen 1:27; Exod 18:21; Lev 19:35-37; Isa 45:9-10; 2 Chron 7:14; Psalm 33:12; Psa 50:16-17; Prov 14:34; Prov 29:26; Zech 7:9; Matt 5:9; Luke 12:2; John 17:17; Rom 13:1–4; 1Cor 16:13; 1 Tim 2:1–2.

PRAY: Pray that truth will prevail in the UK’s courts and institutions, and that judges will uphold righteousness without fear or favour.

Pray for the protection of women’s spaces, dignity, and rights, and that God’s created order of male and female will not be distorted.

Pray that every form of confusion, deception, and ideological influence contrary to truth will be exposed and brought into the light.

Pray for courage among Christians and leaders to stand firm, speak truth, and not be silenced by pressure or fear.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Why there is a ‘Problem with Muslims’

Islam & Immigration

Or watch this video on YouTube

20 March 2026

CW2603MuslimDomination Why there is a ‘Problem with Muslims’

Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister's Questions on 17th March 2026 — Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister’s Questions on 18th March 2026

The Guardian reports that Sir Keir Starmer has claimed the Tory party has a ‘Problem with Muslims’ after their justice spokesman called an Islamic public prayer event an ‘act of domination’.

Take a look at Prime Minister’s Questions (18/03/2026) on the Parliament Channel:
1 Keir denouncing Nick Timothy at 6:57-7:24.
2 Kemi responding that Nick Timothy is standing for ‘British Values’ at 7:37-7:45.
3 Keir: ‘Tories have a Muslim problem’ at 10:30-10:35.

I wonder if Sir Keir has made a mistake in demonstrating his tin ear to growing public disquiet over Muslims and Islamic ambition in this United Kingdom.

But of course Labour has its own ‘Muslim Problem’, which is that they are deserting in droves to the Antichrist Green Party. Watch our video on Rumble:

The truth and the Christian response

London Mayor 'Sir' Sadiq Khan at the Trafalgar Square Iftar. — London Mayor ‘Sir’ Sadiq Khan at the Trafalgar Square Iftar.

Nick Timothy MP was objecting not just to Muslim prayers but to the ‘ADHAN’, the call to prayer, at an open IFTAR, or fast-breaking, event supported and attended by London’s Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan in Trafalgar Square on Monday 19th March 2025. (0:13-0:38)

That Monday was also Ramadan’s Night of Power, Laylat al-Qadr, in which Muslims use verses from the Koran to curse Jews and Christians. We have already reported on that HERE

The ‘ADHAN’ is not a prayer, it’s a declaration. It claims there is no god except ‘Allah’ and that a certain 7th-century Arab trader was his prophet. Bear in mind Allah is NOT Almighty God, the foundation of our Christian heritage and constitution:

Jesus Christ is Lord!

In the Koran, Allah goes out of his way to deny he has ever had a son. We should take Allah at his word when he says it would be beneath his dignity to humble himself and become one of us.

But that is what God did in the Lord Jesus Christ, the King of kings. As it is written in the Bible, Christ Jesus:

Phil 2:7 … made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: (KJV)
Phil 2:8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
Phil 2:9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
Phil 2:10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;
Phil 2:11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Muslims deny Christ’s divinity

Nick Timothy MP (second from right) at PMQ's on 18/03/2026 — Nick Timothy MP (second from right) at PMQ’s on 18/03/2026

All that is what Muslims deny, and their denial is written around the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. It is indeed the Bible’s ‘Abomination of Desolation’. It is clear that Nick Timothy understands this.

His full post on X read: “Too many are too polite to say this. But mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination.
“The Adhan – which declares there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger – is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination.
“Perform these rituals in mosques if you wish. But they are not welcome in our public places and shared institutions.
“And given their explicit repudiation of Christianity they certainly do not belong in our churches and cathedrals.
“I am not suggesting everybody at Trafalgar Square last night is an Islamist. But the domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook.
“Trafalgar Square belongs to all of us. It is a national memorial to our independence and our salvation.
“Last night was not like a televised football match or a St Patrick’s Day celebration. It was an act of domination and therefore division.
“It shouldn’t happen again.”

’Useful idiots’ call division ‘Diversity’

The Iftar in Trafalgar Square on Monday 16th March 2026, Ramadan's 'Night of Power' — The Iftar in Trafalgar Square on Monday 16th March 2026, Ramadan’s ‘Night of Power’

It seems Islam, like Communism, has its ‘useful idiots’, and our Establishment is full of them. In the Commons, Sir Keir went on to wheel out ‘Diversity’ Prime Minister’s Questions 10:04-10:23:

“When I see religious events in Trafalgar Square, when I see Hindus celebrating Diwali, when I see Jews celebrating Chanukah live, when I see Christians performing the Passion of the Christ, or Muslims praying, that shows the great strength of our diverse city and country.”

Well, the last time Jews celebrated Chanukah in public, on Bondi beach in Australia, they were massacred by two Muslim gunmen. Murderous antisemitism is written into the Muslim scriptures. Clearly, Muslims cannot co-exist with Jews. See our report HERE.

Kemi stands by Nick Timothy

Muslim Women ion Islamic dress praying separately from the men in Trafalgar Square. — Muslim Women in Islamic dress praying separately from the men in Trafalgar Square.

The BBC reports a spokesman for Kemi Badenoch saying she stood by Nick Timothy, adding this:
“People are free to practise their faith but that practice does not require exclusionary use of our shared civic spaces. That is not about worship. It becomes something else which undermines social cohesion. So that is where we draw the line. And that is what Nick Timothy was talking about.”

And as usual, Muslim women prayed separately from the men, in Muslim dress. And their dress code itself makes a visible spiritual and political point.

The spokesman denied the Conservatives were singling out one religion, saying: “The Conservatives had the first Muslim chancellor and had the first Muslim home secretary.”

Singling out Islam

Be that as it may, but you may be drawn to conclude that it is about time our leaders DID single out the religion of Islam before it is too late to stop its programme of domination in our land. I’m all for freedom of religion, until the followers of one particular religion, which denies the true faith on which our nation was built, starts to mount a takeover.

Our leaders will first need the spiritual discernment to recognise that threat. In response, as an essential first step, they will need to proclaim the King of kings and to state that our Christian foundation is non-negotiable.

That is essential because this is a spiritual, or if you like, a religious challenge, which they will not be able to rise to in their own strength. They will need the wisdom and the power of the Holy Spirit.

Replace the secularists and multiculturalists!

So pray for the Lord to replace the secularists and multiculturalists in the corridors of power with able, honest, humble, God-fearing men of truth.

And join this spiritual battle yourself. Leave your contact details by filling in our website popup or by signing our petition below to return to our Christian constitution:

Gorton & Denton by-election is judgment →

Previous Videos and Articles

Jews or Muslims? Why Bondi Beach shows we cannot have both →

City bans Muslim festivals →

Oppose ‘Islamophobia’ Definition →

Why is the Green Party so antisemitic →

Islamism, not ‘Islamophobia’, is the threat →

The Green Party’s Muslim Menace →

Islamic Human Rights Commission →

Is ‘Allah’ Almighty God? →

Mosques Mean Criminality →

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

House of Lords Crosses Line on Abortion Law

Abortion & Euthanasia

19 March 2026

Protesters demonstrate against the decriminalisation of abortion outside the House of Lords-BBC

The House of Lords has voted to allow abortion up to birth. How do you square that with their dogged resistance to euthanasia? For us, both are life issues. But (1) parliamentarians have told themselves abortion is ‘a women’s issue’ and (2) they refuse to consider a child in the womb as a human being. That’s how.

Supporting those peers who have obstructed the assisted suicide bill with thousands of amendments, the Scottish Parliament this week voted against it. Give God the glory for that at least. But a significant number of our leaders are imposing a death-wish on our land.

Last June, MPs backed moves to decriminalise the practice through an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, paving the way for further expansion. The provision would remove criminal penalties for abortion, allowing it for any reason, at any stage of pregnancy, including up to and during birth.

Peers rejected Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest’s amendment to remove the clause, voting 185 to 148, and also dismissed Baroness Stroud’s proposal to restore in-person medical consultations, voting 191 to 119. The decisions effectively clear the path for the measure to proceed with minimal procedural restraint.

What is presented under the bureaucratic designation of “Clause 208 of the Crime and Policing Bill” is therefore not a minor legislative adjustment, but a far-reaching redefinition of legal and moral boundaries surrounding the protection of unborn life.

Exodus 20:13 Thou shalt not kill.

The Quiet Advance of a Deadly Change

Supporters of the law insist it reflects medical advice from organisations such as the British Pregnancy Advisory Service and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, framing the change as a compassionate response to vulnerable women.

Yet such arguments obscure the scale of what is being enacted. The language is clinical, procedural, and deliberately restrained, masking the moral gravity beneath. The steady progression of such measures reveals how profound ethical changes are often introduced not through dramatic declarations, but through incremental legal adjustments presented as administrative necessity.

Jeremiah 6:14 For they have healed the hurt… slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

Support the Buffer Zone Challenge →

A Culture That Has Grown Comfortable

This outcome cannot be laid solely at the feet of legislators. It reflects a broader cultural shift in which public opinion has moved decisively towards normalising abortion.

According to British Social Attitudes data, 76% now support abortion on request, a dramatic rise from previous decades. In England and Wales, there were 277,970 abortions in 2023, the highest number on record—amounting to roughly one in three pregnancies.

What was once regarded as a grave moral question has, for many, become a settled social norm. The shift is not only legislative but cultural, reflected in everyday reactions where opposition to abortion is increasingly viewed as extreme or even offensive.

Matthew 24:12 Because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.

Watch our buffer zone video:

The Sanitisation of Ending Life

The transformation is perhaps most visible in how abortion is now carried out. The widespread adoption of abortion pills by post, introduced during the pandemic, means that around 72% of abortions now take place at home, with medical procedures replaced by remote processes.

Since 2013, the proportion of abortions carried out using medication has risen from 49% to 87%, effectively removing the clinical and psychological gravity once associated with the act.

What was once a serious medical intervention has been reframed as a routine, private decision. This sanitisation does not lessen the reality of what occurs, but it does distance society from confronting it.

At a time when the country is increasingly grappling with low birth rate, it is worth remembering that there are approximately 250,000 abortions a year, meaning there would be around 50% more live births if all were allowed continue.

Latest figures report 277,970 abortions for residents of England and Wales in 2023, the highest number since the Abortion Act was introduced and an increase of 11% compared with 2022.

Isaiah 5:23 They that justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him.

A Debate That Avoided the Truth

At the heart of this debate lies a truth that was once widely understood, even by those who disagreed with it: that from the moment a woman becomes pregnant, a life has begun. Whether at one day, three months, or six months, the developing child is not a vague concept or a shifting idea, it is a human being in its earliest form. That was the original point of moral tension in the abortion debate. When does life begin? And if it has begun, what are we permitting?

For many, the answer was clear, even if uncomfortable: a child is a child. Yet rather than resolving that tension with caution, the law has steadily moved in the opposite direction, away from restraint and towards expansion. What was once debated in hushed, careful terms has now been reframed in language that strips away its moral weight.

Now, with provisions that effectively allow abortion up to birth, the question becomes unavoidable. If the life of the unborn child is recognised at earlier stages, on what basis is it denied at the final stage? If ending that life at one point is morally serious, how does it become acceptable at another? These are not abstract questions, they go to the very core of justice and accountability.

It is here that the deepest unease lies. Actions that would once have been considered unthinkable are not only permitted, but increasingly normalised, regulated, and even defended within the framework of law and medicine. This raises a difficult but necessary question: when the law redefines the boundaries of life and death, does it remove moral responsibility, or merely obscure it?

John 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light.

Sign our Petition against Buffer Zones →

A Nation Responsible for Its Direction

Ultimately, this moment reflects not only political decisions but national condition. Laws do not emerge in isolation; they follow the trajectory of public belief and moral sentiment. As public opinion has shifted, so too has the law, with each reinforcing the other. The warnings of history remain relevant: when a society ceases to value life at its most vulnerable, the consequences extend far beyond any single issue.

The question now is not simply what Parliament has done, but what the nation has become. If laws reflect collective values, then this decision stands as a mirror, revealing a society that has grown accustomed to redefining its most fundamental moral boundaries.

Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

Assisted Suicide Bill introduced in Scotland →

Abortionists plotting decriminalisation →

Could Britain be heading back to backstreet abortions? →

Confronting LGBT spiritual strongholds in Scotland →

Vultures descend on abortion case →

‘Legalise abortion on demand up to birth’ says World Health Organisation →

UK-wide abortion ‘buffer zones’ →

MPS vote to decriminalise abortion →

Read and pray

READ: 2Chr 34:21b; Job 1:2; Psa 26:9-10; Psalm 106:37-38; Prov 25:5; Eccl 11:5; Luke 1:44..

PRAY: Pray that God would restore a deep reverence for life from conception, convict hearts across the nation, and raise up voices who will boldly defend the unborn without compromise.

Pray that truth would prevail over deception, that laws which permit the destruction of life would be challenged, and that those in positions of authority would be held to righteous standards.

Pray that the nation would turn back to God in humility, acknowledging moral failure, and that there would be a genuine awakening leading to the restoration of truth, righteousness, and the fear of the Lord.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Read and pray

READ: Isaiah 1:23; Micah 6:8; Matt 23:23; Eph 5:11; Mark 12:30-31; John 14:15; Col 3:2.
PRAY: Pray for the UK. Pray for our leaders to lead in wisdom and the fear of God.
Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Assisted Suicide Bill: Scotland Decides Life Still Matters

18 March 2026

Scotland's assisted dying bill fails to pass in final vote - BBC

In a rare and striking development, Members of the Scottish Parliament have rejected a proposal to legalise assisted suicide, halting what many regarded as a significant moral and legislative shift. In the final vote, the proposal was voted down by 69 votes to 57 with 1 abstention.

The measure, which sought to permit terminally ill adults to seek assistance in ending their lives, was defeated after sustained debate that exposed deep unease across party lines.

This decision stands out precisely because it runs against a broader cultural current in which such measures have steadily gained ground in other jurisdictions.

At a time when the language of “choice” and “dignity” increasingly dominates public discourse, the refusal of MSPs to endorse assisted suicide represents not merely a legislative outcome, but a moment of moral hesitation, a recognition that once the boundary is crossed, it may prove impossible to restore.

Read full report on Scotland vote.

Exodus 20:13 Thou shalt not kill.

Who Is Protected?

Central to the debate were concerns that legalising assisted suicide would not remain confined to tightly controlled circumstances, but would instead create subtle and often unspoken pressures upon the most vulnerable.

The elderly, the disabled, and those suffering from loneliness or depression may come to feel that their continued existence imposes a burden on families or society, particularly in a culture already strained by economic pressures and stretched healthcare systems.

What begins as a “choice” can, over time, become an expectation. Experience in other countries has shown that eligibility criteria tend to expand, safeguards are gradually relaxed, and the moral clarity that once protected life becomes blurred.

The debate, therefore, is not simply about individual autonomy, but about the kind of society being shaped—one that affirms the inherent value of life, or one that begins to measure it according to utility, independence, or perceived worth.

Further reporting on safeguarding concerns

Proverbs 31:8 Open thy mouth for the dumb in the cause of all such as are appointed to destruction

Westminster: A Slower but Significant Resistance

While Scotland has delivered a clear rejection, the issue remains under active consideration in Westminster, where peers in the House of Lords continue to scrutinise the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.

This sustained examination has slowed the Bill’s progress, with members raising detailed concerns about coercion, the adequacy of safeguards, and the long-term ethical consequences of altering the law in such a fundamental area.

The role of the Lords in this context has been particularly significant. Less subject to immediate political pressure, peers have been able to probe the assumptions underlying the legislation, asking not only whether it can be implemented safely, but whether it should be implemented at all. Their resistance, though quieter than parliamentary votes, represents an important check on rapid legal change, and suggests that, even within governing institutions, there remains a recognition of the gravity of redefining the boundaries of life and death.

Read the Background on the Bill Here.

Proverbs 22:28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.

Assisted Suicide Bill introduced in Scotland →

Another Front Opens: The Abortion Debate

This baby at six weeks already has a beating heart. Abortion involves two human beings, one of whom is dependent on the other.

Even as assisted suicide faces resistance, another deeply contentious issue is advancing through Parliament.

Peers are preparing to vote on abortion-related amendments within the Crime and Policing Bill, a development that has drawn concern from across the spectrum due to its potential implications for the legal limits surrounding abortion.

Taken together, these developments point to something deeper than a series of isolated legislative debates. They reveal a nation increasingly uncertain of its moral foundations, where questions once settled are now reopened, and where the value of human life is being weighed, debated, and, in some cases, quietly diminished. From assisted suicide to abortion, the direction of travel suggests not merely legal change, but a gradual reshaping of conscience itself.

The rejection of assisted suicide in Scotland and the resistance in the House of Lords may be welcomed as moments of restraint, yet they also highlight how far the conversation has already shifted. That such measures are seriously considered and repeatedly brought forward, indicates that the underlying assumptions about life, dignity, and suffering are being redefined. What was once unthinkable is now debated; what was once defended as absolute is now treated as conditional.

Isaiah 10:1 Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees.

A Nation at the Crossroads

At the heart of this lies a deeper cultural transformation. A society that loses sight of the inherent value of life will inevitably begin to draw distinctions between lives deemed worth preserving and those quietly regarded as expendable. The vulnerable, the elderly, the unborn, the sick, are always the first to be affected when such lines are redrawn. History has shown that once these moral boundaries are weakened, they are rarely restored without cost.

Yet these moments of resistance also serve as a warning and an opportunity. They expose the consequences of moral drift, but they also remind the nation that another path remains open. Whether Britain continues down a trajectory of gradual erosion, or rediscovers the principles that once underpinned its laws and institutions, will depend not only on Parliament, but on the convictions of its people.

Abortionists plotting decriminalisation →

Confronting LGBT spiritual strongholds in Scotland →

Government putting assisted dying ahead of social care →

Read and pray

READ: 2Chr 34:21b; Job 1:2; Psa 26:9-10; Prov 3:6, 31:8; Eccl 3:2, 8:8; Isa 1:15; Luke 18:20; John 10:17-18; Rom 13:4; Rev 21:4.

PRAY: Pray that God would uphold the sanctity of life in law and in practice, restraining efforts to normalise the ending of life, and strengthening those who stand to defend the vulnerable.

Pray for MPs, MSPs, and peers to have conviction and moral clarity, that they would resist pressure, act with integrity, and uphold righteous principles even when unpopular.

Pray that the nation would turn back to God, rejecting moral compromise, and that truth, justice, and reverence for life would once again shape its laws and culture.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Read and pray

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Nanosermon: A Prophetic Church

Nanosermons & Teachings

More nanosermons and teachings →

18 March 2026

Know the mind of God. Read the whole Bible in one year:

Watch this nanosermon here:

Nanosermon Script:

Should you be prophetic? And what does ‘prophetic’ mean? Here’s a scripture from the book of James, chapter five:

James 5:10 Take, my brethren, the prophets, who have spoken in the name of the Lord, for an example of suffering affliction, and of patience.

Now you might be tempted to think that as the church is one sphere of God’s government, and the state is another, that the church should not interfere, as you might put it, in the affairs of state. Just ‘let them get on with it and we’ll concentrate on saving souls’, could be your reaction.

But in the NanoSermon ‘Pray for our Rulers’ I showed from first Timothy chapter 2 that God desires godly rule in a realm precisely because he wants men to be saved.

And in the NanoSermon ‘Minsters of God’ we saw in Romans chapter 13 that God expects rulers and judges to enact Godly laws, uphold those who do what is righteous in the eyes of God and punish those who do evil.

Keep out of politics?

If the church ‘kept out of politics’ as some want us to do, then the only people IN politics, influencing policy, will be the ungodly.

Banish Christians and the word of God from the public square and you leave it wide open for every God-hating, God-denying secularist, polytheist, pantheist, satanist, agnostic, every proud, wicked, self-serving charlatan and elitist to have a field day. And the only people who will benefit from the laws they will pass will be, no, not the poor, not the righteous, but them and their friends.

For YOUR society to work it needs a prophetic church, and I mean that less in the ‘foretelling’ sense than in the ‘forthtelling’ sense. Less predicting what will happen and more proclaiming the righteous precepts of God.

Prophets are one-fifth of the Bible!

Look, the books of the prophets form one-fifth of the Bible. That’s even without all the prophets in the history books, all the admonitions in the Psalms and all the exhortation in the New Testament.

Are you investing twenty percent of your time calling national leaders to account in the name of the Lord, urging national repentance, setting up a plumbline with the righteous laws of God as did the prophets of old? (Is the Church as a whole? Is YOUR church?)

And what does the Apostle Paul say in first Corinthians 14?

1Cor 14:1 Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy. … 3 … he that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort. 5 I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, …

Bring the word of God to bear

Not just greater, but according to our Lord, who expects us to prophesy, and to receive opposition for so doing, – blessed in the courts of heaven. Here’s Matthew chapter five:

Matt 5:11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

So get going with emails to MP’s and captains of industry, letters in the local press, bringing the word of God to bear on the issues of our day. (Join an emerging political party!)

You will always receive opposition for holding up the Lord’s standard in public, for encouraging and exhorting those in power to follow the ways of God, but there’s a great reward coming your way for being prophetic and a blessing for following in the uncompromising ways of the prophets of old.

SCRIPT ENDS

Bible Reading Plan

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Paedophile Exposed: Are Nurseries Safe?

Education & Children

17 March 2026

Nursery worker who raped toddlers jailed for 24 years

A former paedophile nursery worker has been jailed for 24 years after raping and abusing toddlers in his care at a Bristol childcare facility.

The case raises the question of whether men should be allowed to work in childcare at all. For that matter, why are young women being employed as prison officers in men’s prisons? Is this the same unscriptural woke mindset that forces girls into science and engineering, ‘STEM’ subjects? Is fashionable ‘gender equality’ now putting children’s lives and public safety at risk?

Prov 14:12 (cf 16:25) There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. (KJV)

The offender, Nathan Bennett, 30, targeted children aged just two and three at the Partou King Street Nursery, and was found guilty of eight charges including rape, sexual assault, and assault by penetration relating to five victims.

He had previously admitted a further 13 offences, bringing the total scope of his crimes into stark relief, with the court imposing a 24-year sentence alongside an extended licence period of six years.

The offences were described in court as deeply depraved and calculated.

Numbers 32:23 Be sure your sin will find you out.

“Evil Thoughts Towards Children”

Sentencing at Bristol Crown Court, Judge William Hart delivered a stark moral assessment, describing Bennett as an “incorrigible and dangerous paedophile” with an “uncontrollable and ungovernable” sexual interest in young boys, concluding that his actions were driven by “grossly distorted thinking” and, in his words, “evil.”

Such language is notable in a judicial setting often characterised by restraint, and reflects both the severity of the offences and the deliberate prioritisation of personal gratification over the welfare of defenceless children entrusted to his care.

Paedophile changes gender before court case →

Warning Signs That Went Unheeded

At the centre of this case lies a difficult reality: the care of very young children is now routinely transferred from the home to institutions.

In these settings, strangers are given prolonged and intimate responsibility over children during their most vulnerable years. For many parents, this is not a choice but a necessity, driven by economic pressure and the demands of modern working life. Yet the system that replaces parental oversight relies heavily on procedures and assumptions of professionalism. As this case shows, those safeguards can fail, and when they do, the consequences are severe.

Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man.

Meanwhile, evidence presented in court showed that concerns had been raised about the offender’s behaviour months before his arrest. Both staff and parents reportedly expressed unease. However, these warnings were not escalated or acted upon with sufficient urgency.

This points to a wider failure in safeguarding culture. Systems exist, but they depend on people acting decisively. When hesitation, complacency, or fear of getting it wrong takes hold, risk is allowed to grow.

Sentence Does Not Begin to Repair the Harm

In a statement issued by Leigh Day, the law firm representing several of the families involved, they said the sentence “does not begin to repair the harm caused to so many children”.

“We entrusted our children to Partou King Street nursery believing they would be safe, cared for and nurtured,” they said.

“Instead, that trust was catastrophically broken by someone who abused his position in the most unimaginable way.

“Over the months before Bennett’s arrest, a number of parents raised concerns about his behaviour.

“We know concerns were raised to members of staff, we believe those warnings and complaints were not properly followed up or escalated. Had appropriate action been taken sooner, we fear some of the abuse children suffered may have been prevented.”

Public Reaction and Reader Commentary

Reader responses to the case highlight both unease and frustration over how children’s safety is managed. Ryan Brighton wrote on the Telegraph’s comment session:

“In a way I find it sad that any man wanting to work with children is automatically assumed to have malign motives, but I suppose it is much the same with transgender people in women’s bathrooms; not worth the risk.”

Another reader, James James, expressed more pointed criticism of both the nursery and the parents involved:

“What sort of Nursery Manager would hire a 30-year-old male odd-ball to look after young children? … The hiring manager must have something wrong with her? … Maybe she was a woke liberal nutter, and wanted to tick the diversity box? She should never be allowed to work with children again. Secondly, what sort of parent sends their child to a nursery that a 30-year-old MALE odd-ball is working? What were the parents thinking?
“I think any grown man who wants to be a nursery teacher, dealing with other people’s small children, often intimately in very personal ways — i.e., toileting them, cleaning them up, changing nappies, etc. — has got something wrong with them. Clearly he was an oddball and should never have been hired. Alarm bells should have been ringing when he applied for the job! Shame on the woke diversity box-ticking oddball hiring manager.”

These comments illustrate a widespread public concern: that hiring practices, oversight failures, and ideological considerations may sometimes compromise the safety of children, underscoring the need for vigilance, discernment, and accountability in all institutions caring for the very young.

Proverbs 14:15 The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going.

Deuteronomy 6:6-9 And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart..And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up…And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.

Isaiah 49:15 Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee.

Naive Prison Officer Girl 20 Jailed Sex with Inmate

Alicia Novas (left) began an illicit relationship with prisoner Declan Winkless (right) at HMP Five Wells | NORTHAMPTONSHIRE POLICE

In January 2026, a former prison officer was jailed for engaging in a sexual relationship with an inmate, smuggling drugs and mobile phones into custody, and exposing the identity of an informant.

The offender, Alicia Novas, 20, from Raunds in Northamptonshire, was employed at HMP Five Wells in Wellingborough when the misconduct began. The inmate, Declan Winkless, 31, who was serving an 11-year sentence for conspiracy to commit burglary, also received a sentence of three years and four months, to run consecutively with his existing term.

Ms. Novas had only joined the prison in July 2024, aged 18, following training that emphasised the integrity and professionalism expected of staff. The court heard that she provided her personal telephone number to Mr. Winkless and exchanged almost 3,000 messages with him. The inmate reportedly used four illicit devices during this period and actively pursued the relationship, offering expensive gifts and demonstrating romantic interest.

The case has raised serious concerns about staff oversight and recruitment in custodial environments. It highlights how inexperience, insufficient supervision, and poor safeguards can allow positions of trust to be exploited, putting both the integrity of the prison system and the safety of its staff and inmates at risk.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.

Women Should Not Be in Men’s Prison

Cherri-Ann Austin-Saddington, a former prison officer who had sex with a convicted rapist up to 40 times while on duty. Telegraph.

Isabelle Dale joined the prison service as a teenager, but within months, she abused her authority in shocking ways. At HMP Coldingley, she swore “undying love” to two inmates and had sex with one in the prison chapel. She later became engaged to him, conspired to smuggle drugs into HMP Swaleside, and even tattooed a prisoner’s street name on her own body.

The judge called Ms. Dale “thoroughly devious, untruthful and manipulative,” concluding she had joined the service intending to commit crimes with inmates. Her actions reveal not only personal immorality but a systemic failure in recruitment, supervision, and staff accountability.

Ms. Dale’s case is far from isolated. In the past year, prison staff including Megann Gibson, Morgan Farr Varney, Katie Evans, and even a prison governor, Kerri Pegg, have been convicted for sexual relationships with inmates. In a notorious incident, officer Linda De Sousa Abreu was filmed having sex with a prisoner in his cell while another inmate watched.

The problem is escalating. From 2017 to 2020, nine women were caught in inappropriate relationships with prisoners. Since 2021, at least 45 cases have been recorded, and investigations into staff misconduct have nearly tripled. These relationships compromise safety, encourage contraband smuggling, and fuel violence.

The recurring pattern exposes deep flaws in the prison system. High-risk positions are entrusted to individuals without sufficient oversight, while the mechanisms designed to prevent abuse are repeatedly bypassed. Until these failures.

What Shall We Then Say?

The cases of Nathan Bennett, Alicia Novas, Isabelle Dale, and other prison staff reveal a troubling pattern of not just systemic failure but abuse of power and trust. Children abused in trusted nurseries, prison officers exploiting inmates, and repeated misconduct in positions of authority expose deep rot in the institutions meant to protect the vulnerable.

These are not isolated lapses; they are symptoms of a society where moral vigilance is weak, oversight is ineffective, and the pursuit of personal gratification often outweighs duty and conscience.

When trust is routinely violated and safeguards fail, the very fabric of our communities is undermined. Innocent lives are harmed, families broken, and public confidence eroded. Such stories compel a sobering reflection: without accountability, discipline, and moral courage, our society is left vulnerable to corruption, abuse, and decay.

The Bible reminds us:
Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

Read our related articles here:

Aldi goes woke, puts children at risk →

Patron of gender identity group charged with child sex abuse →

UK Govt faces legal action over RSE→

Sign our petition for freedom and against woke laws →

Read and Pray

Deuteronomy 6:7; Isaiah 49:15; Proverbs 1:8-9; 18:9; Mark 7:20-23; Luke 11:11-13; Rom 12:16; 1 Corinth 1:28-29; 2 Tim 1:5; Eph 6:4; 1 John 2:16; Titus 2:4.
Pray for justice and protection for the innocent, especially children and the vulnerable, that they may be shielded from those who would exploit them.

Pray for wisdom, integrity, and discernment for those in positions of authority, that they may act with courage and righteousness.

Pray for national repentance and revival, that society may restore moral values, accountability, and respect for life and the vulnerable.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Or fill in the form below to keep in touch:

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Al-Quds Day Exposes Britain’s Multicultural Failure

Israel & antisemitism

16 March 2026

The planned Al‑Quds Day march in London on March 15 once again exposed a disturbing reality: Britain’s experiment with multiculturalism has created a public square where hostility toward the nation and its allies can flourish openly.

The event, organised by the Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC), was eventually cancelled after Mark Rowley, Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, requested a ban which was approved by Shabana Mahmood.

Yet the very fact that such a march had been planned at all is an indictment of the political culture that has allowed extremist-adjacent activism to masquerade as legitimate protest.

For years the march has been associated with sectarian agitation and provocative symbolism on the streets of Britain’s capital. A nation that once prided itself on civic cohesion now appears paralysed when confronted with movements that openly import the conflicts of the Middle East into British life.

Al-Quds is the Arabic name for Jerusalem. The Day was created by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini after Iran’s 1979 revolution.

Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.

Government Warnings Ignored

Thousands of pro-Iran demonstrators ignored the government’s directives and went ahead with the cancelled hate rally.

Demonstrators congregated on the South Bank of the Thames for “prayers” and brandished placards declaring ‘boom boom Tel Aviv’.

Chants of ‘from the river to the sea’ and ‘Israel is a terror state’ could be heard as people held pictures of the assassinated Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and his successor, Mojtada Khamenei.

According to the Met Police, three people have been arrested so far. One for showing support for a proscribed organisation, one for dangerous driving and a third for threatening and abusive behaviour.

Pascal Robinson-Foster – one half of the punk rap duo Bob Vylan – repeated his disgraceful Glastonbury chant of ‘death to the IDF’ following a ranting speech at the rally.

Bob Vylan’s performance in June last year sparked widespread backlash and led to the Robinson-Foster having his US visa revoked and gigs cancelled.

Around a hundred counter-protesters were seen on the opposite side of the Thames ahead of a demonstration organised by Stop The Hate.

“This isn’t the Islamic Republic, you can’t silence journalists!”

Writing in Spiked commentator Brendan O’Neill said the scenes he witnessed at the South Bank gathering were deeply disturbing.

According to Mr. O’Neill, many demonstrators appeared to be mourning Ali Khamenei, whom he referred to as “the butcher of Tehran,” after reports he had been killed in an Israeli airstrike on 28 February. Images of the Iranian leader, he said, were displayed prominently throughout the event. Children carried placards bearing his face, while a large banner featuring his image urged passers-by to stand with him on what it called “the right side of history.”

Mr. O’Neill argued that the adulation was deeply troubling given the Iranian regime’s role in violent conflicts across the Middle East. He said the atmosphere treated Khamenei as a heroic figure rather than a leader whose forces and allied militias have been accused of causing widespread suffering.

For him, however, the larger issue extended beyond the demonstration itself. He claimed the scenes reflected a deeper problem within Britain’s political culture. Multiculturalism, he argued, is often criticised merely for dividing communities, but its more dangerous effect, he said, is that it can foster hostility toward the nation’s own institutions and identity.

“Greater Potential for Conflict”

Shabana Mahmood MP protesting against Israel in 2014 in Birmingham

Shabana Mahmood said in a statement to those in the Commons, that there was a “greater potential for conflict” at marches for Al Quds Day in London as a result of the war in Iran and “heightened tensions between protesters and counter-protesters”.

“Al Quds Day is an event held on the last Friday of Ramadan. The day is marked worldwide by rallies and demonstrations in support of Palestine, including here in Britain.

“Plans for a procession this Sunday in London have been led by the Islamic Human Rights Commission, an organisation that has been closely associated with the Iranian regime.

“Of course, this year’s event interacts with the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. It comes at a time when the Iranian regime is attacking British forces and bases, as well as those of our allies.

“It also comes just days after the arrest of four individuals as part of an investigation led by counter terror police. They were arrested under the National Security Act for allegedly spying on Jewish communities on behalf of the Iranian regime.

“This context creates clear challenges for the police – heightened attention, and therefore larger expected attendance, heightened tensions between protesters and counter-protesters, and therefore greater potential for conflict.”

She also told MPs that a ban on processions related to Al Quds Day will be in place until April 11.

The Troubling Organisation Behind the Demonstration

Concerns surrounding the IHRC are not speculative; they have been formally recorded in official government analysis.

In the 2023 independent review of the Prevent programme, reviewer William Shawcross described the organisation as “an Islamist group ideologically aligned with the Iranian regime, that has a history of extremist links and terrorist sympathies.”

Such a characterisation from a government-commissioned review is extraordinary. Yet despite this warning, the organisation has continued to operate within Britain’s civic sphere, organising demonstrations that bring ideological battles from Tehran and the wider Middle East into the heart of London.

Matthew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

When Extremism Walks London’s Streets

Previous Al-Quds marches have repeatedly been marked by the display of symbols linked to Hezbollah, a group banned under UK terrorism legislation.

Arrests for racial hatred and inflammatory chanting have also accompanied the demonstrations. For Britain’s Jewish community, the images of militant flags waving through central London have become a grim annual ritual.

When the streets of a Western capital echo with the imagery of groups tied to terrorism, the question is unavoidable: how did such scenes become tolerated in the first place?

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.

Honouring a Terror Architect

The ideological sympathies surrounding the organisation have also surfaced in other disturbing ways.

Representatives connected to the IHR previously attended a vigil honouring Qasem Soleimani, the commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps who orchestrated military campaigns across the Middle East.

Soleimani’s operations fuelled wars in Syria and elsewhere that resulted in enormous civilian suffering. To see a figure associated with such devastation commemorated in London is a stark demonstration of how radically different moral frameworks are now competing within Britain’s public life.

Proverbs 28:4 They that forsake the law praise the wicked.

Watch our video: Is Allah Almighty God:

The Failure of the Multicultural Dream

Britain’s leaders have spent decades promoting multiculturalism as a social ideal. The result has been a fractured national identity where imported grievances and ideological loyalties increasingly take precedence over shared civic values.

The annual controversy surrounding the Al-Quds march is not an isolated incident but a symptom of that deeper failure. Instead of fostering harmony, the policy has too often allowed hostile political movements to take root within British society.

When demonstrations tied to foreign conflicts regularly inflame tensions between communities in London, the conclusion becomes difficult to avoid: a nation that refuses to defend its cultural foundations will inevitably struggle to preserve its unity.

Mark 3:25 A house divided against itself cannot stand.

Ramadan’s Night of Power – Laylat al-Qadr →

https://www.christianvoice.org.uk/index.php/islamaphobia-definition-islamism-the-real-threat/ →

Jews or Muslims? Why Bondi Beach shows we cannot have both. →

Muslim student loses prayer case →

“Police should not march with pride” →

Tommy Robinson ‘contempt’ in Muslim grooming case →

Read and pray

READ: Gen 1:27; Gen 1:27; Exod 18:21; Lev 19:35-37; Isa 58:1; 2 Chron 7:14; Psalm 33:12; Matth 5:9; John 8:32; Rom 13:1–4; 2 Tim 1:7; Eph 4:15;Col 4:6; James 1:5

PRAY: Pray that Britain’s leaders will seek God’s wisdom and courage to uphold justice, truth, and the protection of all communities.

Pray for peace between communities in Britain, that hatred and division will be replaced with respect, truth, and genuine reconciliation.

Pray that the nation will turn back to God’s ways and rediscover the biblical values that once shaped its public life.

Let us know what YOU think in the comments below.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

It ain’t half woke, Mum. Soldiers wearing make-up?

13 March 2026

Army chiefs have asked male soldiers if they want to wear cosmetics and do their hair like women.

In a move almost designed to give idiotic antichrist diversity policy in His Majesty’s Armed Forces a bad name, they are asking troops: ‘Guys, do you want to wear make-up and nail polish?’

There’s both Bible and a good laugh in our video here on Rumble:

Or on YouTube if you prefer. (Opens in a new tab.)

Non-binary service personnel?

A newspaper explains: “The consultation from Army HQ in Andover asked soldiers if they agreed ‘rules on make-up should be gender-free’, explaining, ‘this means that men, women and non-binary service personnel can all wear make-up in the same way’.”

At a time when the Ministry of Defence could not be bothered to send a functioning warship to defend our base in Cyprus on time ahead of the US war with Iran, I’m sure you are encouraged to know the defence of the realm depends on ‘non-binary service personnel’, whatever they are.

I wonder if our troops are going to turn out like the entertainment battery in ‘It ain’t half hot Mum’, with whom Battery Sergeant-Major Williams, played by the late Windsor Davies, was not impressed: Watch from 30seconds or click instead on our video above for the clip.

Quit you like men, be strong

Make-up right now is banned for men in His Majesty’s Armed Forces and they must have short hair ‘which does not reach to the collar or on to the ears’.

Which sounds much like the Bible’s rule for the priests in the prophet Ezekiel’s word, chapter forty-four: Ezek 44:20 Neither shall they shave their heads, nor suffer their locks to grow long; they shall only poll their heads.

Even Israel’s enemies the Philistines, terrified of Israel, said to each other: 1Sam 4:9 Be strong, and quit yourselves like men, O ye Philistines, … quit yourselves like men, and fight.

The Apostle Paul uses the same phrase to tell the church in Corinth: 1Cor 16:13 Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.

Which is a word to you and me in our day, as it happens. But I doubt either the Philistines or the Corinthian Christians were asking to take the afternoon off to have their hair done. There’s no gender equality in the mind of God. The prophets expect men to fight and women not to.

The Day of the Lord is on its way

In a judgment on Egypt concerning the Day of the Lord, the prophet Isaiah says: Isa 19:16 In that day shall Egypt be like unto women: and it shall be afraid and fear because of the shaking of the hand of the LORD of hosts, which he shaketh over it.

You know, with an establishment like ours, in the United Kingdom, we the people should have every right to be afraid and in fear of the judgment to come.

So join me in praying for the Lord to raise up able God-fearing honest men of truth who will proclaim the Lord Jesus and send the wokerati out of the corridors of power and, obviously, out of the armed forces.

The diversity battalion can have their nails done in their own time.

Support us!

We appreciate your support; it enables our research and helps us inform your prayers.
So click below to support Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings

Click on the social media links below to share this post:

Ramadan’s Night of Power – Laylat al-Qadr

Islam & Immigration

11 March 2026

It will be common for Muslims to place Islamic scriptures or the whole quran on their heads during the Laylatul Qadr night of prayer, which is on Monday 18th May 2020

It will be common for Muslims to place Islamic scriptures or the whole quran on their heads during the Laylat al-Qadr night of prayer, which is on Monday 16th March 2026 — It will be common for Muslims to place Islamic scriptures or the whole Quran on their heads during the Laylat al-Qadr night of prayer, which is on Monday 16th March 2026

Christians will be aware of the Islamic month of Ramadan, but what is its ‘Night of Power’ all about? Ramadan began on the evening of Tuesday 17th Feb 2026 and will finish on Thursday 19th March. Laylat al-Qadr is expected on Monday 16th March 2026.

The word ‘Ramadan’ is derived from a root meaning ‘heat’. The original month of Ramadan was during the hottest part of the Arab year.