Why would the U.S. rearm the Free Syrian Army, which sold the beheaded American journalists to ISIS?
In an articlepublished in World Net Daily, Joseph Farah has shown the folly of Obama’s policy regarding ISIS.
In deciding to arm “moderate Muslims”, Obama is ignoring the reality that most of the deaths perpetrated by ISIS have been leveled against Christian populations.
Farah’s article, titled “Why arm Mideast Muslims, not Christians?“, points out that while details are hard to verify, “we do know for certain is that Mosul, Iraq’s largest Christian town of about 300,000, has been virtually emptied of its population. That alone suggests a Christian holocaust is well under way.” Farah continued:
The Christian population of Iraq had already been largely driven out by years of war, persecution and infighting as they were treated as an afterthought even by U.S. occupation forces. Most of them fled to Syria, and have since faced death, persecution and refugee status yet again at the hands of ISIS.
In Mosul, ISIS advertised its barbarity and ruthlessness by photographing their executions of Christian children. They herded the kids into parks, beheaded them and placed their heads on sticks. ISIS has made music videos of themselves murdering Christian civilians and captured Iraqi soldiers, mostly Shiites.
ISIS targets Christian children.
“They are literally enjoying the act of killing and the fear and suffering experienced by others,” reports Catholic Online. “This sadism may be the purest manifestation of evil witnessed since the Rape of Nankin during World War II.”
Yet there was no mention of Christians in Obama’s “strategy” talk last week. Instead, Obama suggested the real victims of ISIS, which he insists is not Islamic, are mostly Muslims. This is an outrageous distortion of reality as the Christian community of the Middle East continues to face genocide at the hands of ISIS and al-Qaida.
Since the 1990s in Bosnia, the U.S. has systematically interceded to stop what it characterizes as ethnic and religious cleansing – only when the victims are Muslim. Not once has the U.S. lifted a hand to protect Christians. Muslim groups have been armed to defend themselves in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, often resulting in more bloodshed, not less. Not once has the U.S. even debated the idea of arming or rescuing Christians from the onslaught of fratricidal jihadists.
Once again, no one is rushing to aid Christians caught in the crossfire.
Why not?
Why does the U.S. continue to do the same thing over and over again expecting different results?
Why does the U.S. provide military and other aid to Islamic communities and armies all over the world but never to Christians who face far more gruesome persecution?
Why is there no effort even to rescue the Christians or provide them with a homeland of their own?
Obama cannot be trusted to bomb Syrian targets, either. Just a year ago, he was demanding Congress give him authority to bomb the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad, who has been fighting ISIS and offering more protection to Christians than the U.S. has throughout its Iraq occupation. Now Obama says he wants to bomb the other side in this conflict. With such a history of poor judgment, should he really be trusted to pick the right targets?
Christians have been the forgotten victims in this war for too long.
It’s time to give peace a chance by arming them to defend themselves or evacuating them on a massive scale and providing a safe haven for them in the U.S.
“[facebook-comments-master-un]”
Find out how to join Christian Voice and stand up for the King of kings (clicking on the link below does not commit you to join)
Please note that persons wishing to comment on this story must enter a valid email address. Comments from persons leaving fictitious email addresses will be trashed.
the man is a closet Muslim why should he care about infidel Christians? He is probably taking advice from the Muslims he appointed to his security council and CAIR. Definitely the worst US president in recent times if not ever!
Before we seek a solution let us first remember that our governments caused this problem by:
1) Creating the Sunni army of ISIS (along with the USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar) for the purposes of destabilizing the Shiite crescent of Syria-Iran-Hezbollah in a classic divide and conquer strategy (Sunnis are enemies of Shiites like Catholics were enemies of Protestants in the 16th century).
2) Creating the vacuum into which ISIS has moved through our destruction of the governments of Syria, Libya and Iraq. We knew fully well that these 3 regimes were not only SECULAR BULWARKS against religious extremists but were also ruled by strongmen who alone had the qualities to stop their ARTIFICIALLY CONSTRUCTED nations flying apart into ethnic strife.
Prior to these 2 events Christians in the Middle East lived in relative peace being protected by the very men we destroyed–Assad, Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi.
All this has happened because we have a foreign policy that has nothing to do with U.K.-U.S.A. national interest but is instead driven by the A.I.P.A.C–NEOCON–Israel first ethnic matrix that controls the US government.
Our intervention since 2001 has resulted in 1-2m Arab deaths, 8m displaced people and the American taxpayer bankrupted to the tune of US$3-6T.
The answer therefore is NOT more intervention but a U-TURN in foreign policy.
The regional powers have sufficient resources to obliterate ISIS and stabilize the situation but they cannot do so until our governments finally end their Machiavellian games of arming and training ISIS behind the scenes whilst simultaneously expressing outrage at its (real or fabricated) atrocities and then using these atrocities as a pretext for further intervention-destabilization!!
Cui bono other than Israel from the endless chaos and fragmentation of these Arab nations?
The link is various policy papers written in the 1990s by Neo-Conservative think tanks–cannot give you the names now but will send you the links when I come across them.
Muslim factions like Al Quaeda and Islamic State?
Bankers?
Arms manufacturers?
Oil companies?
Western-funded ‘Opposition Groups’?
Quite a lot of people benefit, when you stop and think about it.
And it doesn’t benefit Israel to have more militant Islamic factions gaining ascendancy.
Psalm 122:6 Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.
Or this could simply be unwitting puppets carrying out Isaiah’s prophecy:
Isa 60:12 For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.
And I forgot to mention the influence on US foreign policy of an entity called A.I.P.A.C. which is considered to be the most powerful lobby group in the USA and on whom much has been written.
No matter how much you want to blame Israel, it doesn’t change the fact that God will judge the nations that turn against Israel. It was the false prophet Muhammad who beheaded 700 Jews in one day and waged war against them. For centuries the Muslim mafia has been murdering innocent people. They have done far more damage thanIsrael has done.
about Iraq…….
It was in the news that Sadam H. had started to rebuild babylon. But God said, Jeremiah 50and 51 the whole chapter s, but especially 50:39,40, and 51:26,62, THAT “babylon shall never be rebuilt”
but that ” it shall be desolate forever”. Therefore Yahweh/Jehovah was at the head of the invasion. The miracles of Yahweh or Jehovah of Daniel in the lions’den and the three hebrewyouths in the burning fiery furnace took place theere.Daniel chapter 6and 3.
Also, the prophesy in Isaiah 19: goes,” In that day shall Egypt be the third with Israel and Assyria( the area around Mosul) , even a blessing in midst of the land whom The LORD (yah or Jehovah )of hosts shall bless saying, Blessed Egypt my people,Assyra the work of my hands and Israel my heritage.”
the religious book from arabia, which name in translationmeans ‘ recital’, makes a claim to be the ‘best of scriptures’, but, does not appear to have a rule of interpretation,when the bible has two,
Isaiah 28:9,10;and 2 Peter 1:20. So,unless someone can provide a rule of interpetation in that book, I dont
see how it could claim to be bnetter than the Bible, the KJV. The essential problem about the ‘recital’, is that it is ani-Christ because it states that Christ did not die on the cross (or tree. 1 peter1:24).
[…] if they left the EU. Because Obama wants to be allied with Islamist countries instead of be allies with historically-Christian allies such as the UK. Under President Trump, the US-UK relations will remain […]
the man is a closet Muslim why should he care about infidel Christians? He is probably taking advice from the Muslims he appointed to his security council and CAIR. Definitely the worst US president in recent times if not ever!
Before we seek a solution let us first remember that our governments caused this problem by:
1) Creating the Sunni army of ISIS (along with the USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar) for the purposes of destabilizing the Shiite crescent of Syria-Iran-Hezbollah in a classic divide and conquer strategy (Sunnis are enemies of Shiites like Catholics were enemies of Protestants in the 16th century).
2) Creating the vacuum into which ISIS has moved through our destruction of the governments of Syria, Libya and Iraq. We knew fully well that these 3 regimes were not only SECULAR BULWARKS against religious extremists but were also ruled by strongmen who alone had the qualities to stop their ARTIFICIALLY CONSTRUCTED nations flying apart into ethnic strife.
Prior to these 2 events Christians in the Middle East lived in relative peace being protected by the very men we destroyed–Assad, Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi.
All this has happened because we have a foreign policy that has nothing to do with U.K.-U.S.A. national interest but is instead driven by the A.I.P.A.C–NEOCON–Israel first ethnic matrix that controls the US government.
Our intervention since 2001 has resulted in 1-2m Arab deaths, 8m displaced people and the American taxpayer bankrupted to the tune of US$3-6T.
The answer therefore is NOT more intervention but a U-TURN in foreign policy.
The regional powers have sufficient resources to obliterate ISIS and stabilize the situation but they cannot do so until our governments finally end their Machiavellian games of arming and training ISIS behind the scenes whilst simultaneously expressing outrage at its (real or fabricated) atrocities and then using these atrocities as a pretext for further intervention-destabilization!!
I don’t think it’s anything to do with Israel, Michael, but you raise some other interesting points.
Cui bono other than Israel from the endless chaos and fragmentation of these Arab nations?
The link is various policy papers written in the 1990s by Neo-Conservative think tanks–cannot give you the names now but will send you the links when I come across them.
Muslim factions like Al Quaeda and Islamic State?
Bankers?
Arms manufacturers?
Oil companies?
Western-funded ‘Opposition Groups’?
Quite a lot of people benefit, when you stop and think about it.
And it doesn’t benefit Israel to have more militant Islamic factions gaining ascendancy.
Psalm 122:6 Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.
Or this could simply be unwitting puppets carrying out Isaiah’s prophecy:
Isa 60:12 For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.
Here is your answer Stephen from a former insider –now a theologian–who has seen the light
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=967
And I forgot to mention the influence on US foreign policy of an entity called A.I.P.A.C. which is considered to be the most powerful lobby group in the USA and on whom much has been written.
Michael Isola
No matter how much you want to blame Israel, it doesn’t change the fact that God will judge the nations that turn against Israel. It was the false prophet Muhammad who beheaded 700 Jews in one day and waged war against them. For centuries the Muslim mafia has been murdering innocent people. They have done far more damage thanIsrael has done.
about Iraq…….
It was in the news that Sadam H. had started to rebuild babylon. But God said, Jeremiah 50and 51 the whole chapter s, but especially 50:39,40, and 51:26,62, THAT “babylon shall never be rebuilt”
but that ” it shall be desolate forever”. Therefore Yahweh/Jehovah was at the head of the invasion. The miracles of Yahweh or Jehovah of Daniel in the lions’den and the three hebrewyouths in the burning fiery furnace took place theere.Daniel chapter 6and 3.
Also, the prophesy in Isaiah 19: goes,” In that day shall Egypt be the third with Israel and Assyria( the area around Mosul) , even a blessing in midst of the land whom The LORD (yah or Jehovah )of hosts shall bless saying, Blessed Egypt my people,Assyra the work of my hands and Israel my heritage.”
the religious book from arabia, which name in translationmeans ‘ recital’, makes a claim to be the ‘best of scriptures’, but, does not appear to have a rule of interpretation,when the bible has two,
Isaiah 28:9,10;and 2 Peter 1:20. So,unless someone can provide a rule of interpetation in that book, I dont
see how it could claim to be bnetter than the Bible, the KJV. The essential problem about the ‘recital’, is that it is ani-Christ because it states that Christ did not die on the cross (or tree. 1 peter1:24).
[…] if they left the EU. Because Obama wants to be allied with Islamist countries instead of be allies with historically-Christian allies such as the UK. Under President Trump, the US-UK relations will remain […]